Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of minicono abutment on implant surrounding tissue healing and bone resorption on implants placed in healed bone. An experimental study in dogs

  • Received: 03 June 2023 Revised: 28 July 2023 Accepted: 28 July 2023 Published: 14 August 2023
  • The objective of this evaluation was to measure the width and length of connective tissue (CT) and crestal bone resorption (CBR) related to minicono® abutment inserted in conical connection dental implants, which were placed crestal and subcrestally in a dog's mandible.

    Materials and Methods 

    Forty-eight Top DM implants with the same coronal diameter were placed at the crestal level, 1 mm (test 1 group) and 2 mm (test 2 group) positions underneath buccal-lingual bone crests. Dental implants used in the study were separated into three groups of 16 implants each. The implants were randomly inserted into healed bone after two months post-extraction sockets of three lower premolars, and first molar, bilaterally in six male fox hound dogs. One 3 mm minicono height abutment was connected to conical connection implants placed at the crestal level (control), 1 mm (test 1) and 2 mm (test 2) positions under buccal-lingual crests.

    Results 

    All abutments and implants used were clinically and histologically integrated into the bone-soft tissue. Soft tissue behavior was observed at eight and 12 weeks in all test groups, displaying similar quantitative findings with significant differences (p > 0.05). However, crestal bone loss was significantly greater at the buccal side around that control group compared to the test 1 and 2 groups. The difference values between groups at the implant shoulder to the top of the lingual bone crest (IS-LBC) and the implant shoulder to the top of the buccal bone crest (IS-BBC) were significantly greater for the test 2 group in comparison with the other two groups (p < 0.05) at eight weeks. In addition, crestal bone resorption (CBR) increased in the crestal group at twelve weeks, but it was reduced for the test 1 and test 2 groups in implants placed sub-crestally (p < 0.05).

    Conclusions 

    Crestal bone loss could be reduced using a 3 mm high abutment on implants submerged below the bone crest from 1 to 2 mm positions.

    Citation: José Luis Calvo-Guirado, Marta Belén Cabo-Pastor, Francisco Martínez-Martínez, Miguel Ángel Garcés-Villalá, Félix de Carlos-Villafranca, Nuria García-Carrillo, Manuel Fernández-Domínguez. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of minicono abutment on implant surrounding tissue healing and bone resorption on implants placed in healed bone. An experimental study in dogs[J]. AIMS Bioengineering, 2023, 10(3): 183-201. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2023013

    Related Papers:

    [1] Yixian Wen, Yanting Xu . Statistical monitoring of economic growth momentum transformation: empirical study of Chinese provinces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 24825-24847. doi: 10.3934/math.20231266
    [2] Qingsheng Zhu, Changwen Xie, Jia-Bao Liu . On the impact of the digital economy on urban resilience based on a spatial Durbin model. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 12239-12256. doi: 10.3934/math.2023617
    [3] Yanting Xu, Tinghui Li . Measurement and spatiotemporal patterns of China's digital economy efficiency. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 29307-29331. doi: 10.3934/math.20231500
    [4] Jia-Bao Liu, Xi-Yu Yuan . Prediction of the air quality index of Hefei based on an improved ARIMA model. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18717-18733. doi: 10.3934/math.2023953
    [5] Yue Liu, Liming Chen, Liangting Lv, Pierre Failler . The impact of population aging on economic growth: a case study on China. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 10468-10485. doi: 10.3934/math.2023531
    [6] Jun Wang, Dan Wang, Yuan Yuan . Research on low-carbon closed-loop supply chain strategy based on differential games-dynamic optimization analysis of new and remanufactured products. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32076-32101. doi: 10.3934/math.20241540
    [7] Muhamad Deni Johansyah, Asep K. Supriatna, Endang Rusyaman, Jumadil Saputra . Application of fractional differential equation in economic growth model: A systematic review approach. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 10266-10280. doi: 10.3934/math.2021594
    [8] Wanchun Fan, Yan Jiang, Songyang Huang, Weiguo Liu . Research and prediction of opioid crisis based on BP neural network and Markov chain. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(5): 1357-1368. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.5.1357
    [9] Hui Han, Chaoyu Yang, Xianya Geng . Research on the impact of green finance on the high quality development of the sports industry based on statistical models. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27589-27604. doi: 10.3934/math.20231411
    [10] Bo Zhang, Yuelin Gao, Ying Qiao, Ying Sun . A nonlinear relaxation-strategy-based algorithm for solving sum-of-linear-ratios problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25396-25412. doi: 10.3934/math.20241240
  • The objective of this evaluation was to measure the width and length of connective tissue (CT) and crestal bone resorption (CBR) related to minicono® abutment inserted in conical connection dental implants, which were placed crestal and subcrestally in a dog's mandible.

    Materials and Methods 

    Forty-eight Top DM implants with the same coronal diameter were placed at the crestal level, 1 mm (test 1 group) and 2 mm (test 2 group) positions underneath buccal-lingual bone crests. Dental implants used in the study were separated into three groups of 16 implants each. The implants were randomly inserted into healed bone after two months post-extraction sockets of three lower premolars, and first molar, bilaterally in six male fox hound dogs. One 3 mm minicono height abutment was connected to conical connection implants placed at the crestal level (control), 1 mm (test 1) and 2 mm (test 2) positions under buccal-lingual crests.

    Results 

    All abutments and implants used were clinically and histologically integrated into the bone-soft tissue. Soft tissue behavior was observed at eight and 12 weeks in all test groups, displaying similar quantitative findings with significant differences (p > 0.05). However, crestal bone loss was significantly greater at the buccal side around that control group compared to the test 1 and 2 groups. The difference values between groups at the implant shoulder to the top of the lingual bone crest (IS-LBC) and the implant shoulder to the top of the buccal bone crest (IS-BBC) were significantly greater for the test 2 group in comparison with the other two groups (p < 0.05) at eight weeks. In addition, crestal bone resorption (CBR) increased in the crestal group at twelve weeks, but it was reduced for the test 1 and test 2 groups in implants placed sub-crestally (p < 0.05).

    Conclusions 

    Crestal bone loss could be reduced using a 3 mm high abutment on implants submerged below the bone crest from 1 to 2 mm positions.



    As environment issues have been increasingly prominent, low carbon development has gradually been a needed option for the economic development of all countries. China is striving to foster its ecological progress, seeking high-quality development, and it has been stated that China's economy has been transitioning from a phase of high-speed growth to a stage of high-quality development. Economic growth has gone from emphasizing quantity to stressing quality, which shows the intrinsic requirements of keeping a sustainable and healthy economic growth in China. Since China is at the pivotal moment of promoting ecological progress and achieving high-quality development, the exploration and grasp of the changing regularities of low carbon economy and quality of economic growth is an important guarantee for successfully achieving high-quality development. The construction of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area is a key strategic plan of China. The goal is to build it into a first-class bay area and a world-class urban agglomeration and thus set it as an example of high-quality development. As a vital part of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, Guangdong Province is one of the most economically and socially developed provinces in China; therefore, it must be at the forefront of the provinces in China in exploring and achieving high-quality economic development.

    There is limited research on measuring low-carbon economy and quality of economic growth from the perspective of new development concepts, and further research is needed on the regional imbalance and its changing patterns of low-carbon economy and quality of economic growth. The convergence of low-carbon economy and quality of economic growth has been a new exploration direction in recent years, with a very broad space for expansion. The major innovations of this paper include: On the one hand, we construct low-carbon economy and quality of economic growth measurement indicators from the perspective of new development concepts, and adopt the entropy method for measurement; on the other hand, we use the coefficient of variation and convergent model with fixed effects to analyze the convergences of low carbon economy and quality of economic growth.

    This paper is conducive to better grasping the changing regularities of low carbon economy, quality of economic growth and their convergences, enriching related research on low carbon economy and quality of economic growth, and providing a reference for the formulation of urban and regional economic policies. This provides the realization of high-quality economic development and "double carbon goal" of China.

    The Kyoto Protocol, aiming to address climate changes, promoted the formation of the concept of low carbon economy, which was first proposed in the UK's Energy White Paper in 2003 [15]. Chinese scholars have also begun to discuss low carbon economy in the context of China's economic development model [6,16,19], and since then, most studies have discussed low carbon and high-quality development at the macro level [23,44,47,50]. Some research has studied how firms can achieve low carbon development at the micro level [38].

    Quality of economic growth has a definition in both narrow and broad sense. In a narrow sense, it can be analyzed from perspectives of total factor productivity [30,49], economic structure [26,45], and environment [17]. In a broad sense, which is widely recognized, scholars have begun to comprehensively analyze it from the aspects of the environment, income, welfare, education, law, and order [5,37]. The evaluation of quality of economic growth is developing in a multi-dimensional way. Also, different research needs to make the evaluation dimension subjective [27].

    Some scholars put quality of economic growth into the theoretical framework of economic growth for analysis, and believed that it was an extension of the theoretical framework of economic growth and that quantitative growth and qualitative growth were two aspects of the same question in economic growth theory [33]. Ren's research team conducted in-depth discussions from this perspective [9,10,40], which had a broad impact on subsequent research. Therefore, most scholars regard in their research the quality of economic growth as a concept that is closely related to economic growth amount but has a broader connotation. In terms of measurement methods, by constructing a multi-dimensional indicator system, principal component analysis [10,21,40,48], and entropy method [41,42] are adopted to measure the quality of economic growth. The low carbon economy in economic growth quality has been a hot topic of concern in the academic community in recent years [20], with more and more related research focusing on different countries [2,12,22,28], a series of related studies have been conducted from different perspectives [51,52,53,54,55,56,57].

    Early discussions on the phenomenon of economic growth convergence include the analysis of changes in per capita income within a neoclassical framework [32], and the "Yerkes-Dodson Law" in regional income convergence [43]. Since then, scholars have begun to carry out corresponding empirical research in line with local conditions [1,7]. Although some studies have also been questioned [14], they have played a great role in promoting relevant research. In the 1990s, scholars questioned the traditional empirical process and began to try new methods to empirically analyze the phenomenon of economic growth convergence [8,29,31]. Furthermore, scholars have also begun to explore the phenomenon of economic growth convergence in China [11,18,34], and influential representative results have emerged one after another, such as economic growth convergence mechanism based on the neoclassical analysis framework [3,4] and its empirical analysis [24,39], "club convergence" of China's economic growth [35]. In contrast, there are relatively few studies on the convergence of low carbon economy and quality of economic growth. In recent years, scholars have begun to try to analyze the convergence of quality of economic growth from different perspectives and with various methods [13,25,36,46], but it is at the early stage of exploration.

    Most literatures have focused on the convergence of economic growth and income. Recently, scholars have begun to pay attention to the convergence of low-carbon economy and quality of economic growth, yet it is at the early stage of exploration, and there is a very broad space for expansion. As cities pay more and more attention to the quality of economic growth, how does their convergences of low carbon economy and quality of economic growth change? Based on the research status quo and the reality of urban economic development, we construct measurement indicators of low carbon economy and quality of economic growth in combination with the new development philosophy, and analyze the convergences in multiple dimensions.

    The essence of low carbon economy is to realize the green development of economy. Thus, green development indicators of quality of economic growth can be adopted to construct measurement indicators of low carbon economy (see Table 1). Therefore, the green dimension of quality of economic growth has reflected the low carbon development of economy. The secondary indicators are composed of coordination of energy efficiency and environmental pollution. Energy efficiency is shown by growth of energy consumption per unit of GRP, which is a negative indicator. Environmental pollution consists of four basic indicators, namely waste water discharge, industrial waste gas emission, industrial fume (dust) emission, and industrial solid waste production. In order to eliminate the biased error in the measurement of indicators, the indicators used here are relative indicators, which are all negative indicators. These indicators all have made energy efficiency and environmental pollution highly relative to GRP, which better shows the low carbon development of economy.

    Table 1.  Indicator system of low carbon economy.
    Primary indicators Secondary indicators Basic indicators Calculation methods Unit Indicator attribute
    Green development dimension (Low carbon development) energy efficiency energy efficiency (x11) growth of energy consumption per unit of GRP % negative
    environmental pollution waste water discharge (x12) total amount of waste water discharge/GRP ton/ten thousand yuan negative
    industrial waste gas emission (x13) total amount of industrial waste gas emission/GRP M3/yuan negative
    industrial fume (dust) emission (x14) total amount of industrial smoke (dust) emission/GRP ton/one hundred million yuan negative
    industrial solid waste production (x15) industrial solid waste production amount/GRP ton/ten thousand yuan negative

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Many Chinese representative studies [10,33,40] have constructed indicator measurement systems of quality of economic growth, which involve some dimensions related to the new development philosophy, but few have constructed such system from the very five dimensions of the new development philosophy. Based on existing studies, we measured the quality of economic growth from the five dimensions of the new development philosophy, namely innovative, coordinated, green, open, and shared development dimensions. Quality of economic growth is first manifested in the transformation from traditional-factor-driven economic growth to innovation-driven economic growth and in the coordination within the economic system and among economic systems of different regions. Then, the external manifestation of the economic system is the coordinated development between humans and nature, as well as the linkage between domestic and international economies, whose ultimate goal is to widely share the final results. Table 2 is the indicator system of quality of economic growth with a total of 19 basic indicators.

    Table 2.  Indicator system of quality of economic growth.
    Primary indicators Secondary indicators Basic indicators Calculation methods Unit Indicator attribute
    Innovative development dimension R&D input R&D intensity (x1) total R&D spending/GRP % positive
    public budget on science and technology expenditure (x2) public budget on science and technology expenditure/total public budget expenditure % positive
    R&D result number of licensed patent (x3) piece positive
    Education input public budget on education expenditure (x4) public budget on education expenditure/total public budget expenditure % positive
    Coordinated development dimension coordination of industrial structure proportion of the secondary industry (x5) % positive
    proportion of the tertiary industry (x6) % positive
    coordination of investment and consumption structure investment rate(x7) gross capital formation/expenditure-based GRP % positive
    consumption rate (x8) final consumption expenditure/expenditure-based GRP % positive
    investment-to-consumption ratio(x9) gross capital formation/final consumption expenditure moderate
    coordination of urban and rural areas urban-rural income ratio (x10) per capita disposable income of urban residents/per capita disposable income of rural residents negative
    Green development dimension energy efficiency energy efficiency (x11) growth of energy consumption per unit of GRP % negative
    environmental pollution waste water discharge (x12) total amount of waste water discharge/GRP ton/ten thousand yuan negative
    industrial waste gas emission (x13) total amount of industrial waste gas emission/GRP M3/yuan negative
    industrial fume (dust) emission (x14) total amount of industrial smoke (dust) emission/GRP ton/one hundred million yuan negative
    industrial solid waste production (x15) industrial solid waste production amount/GRP ton/ten thousand yuan negative
    Open development dimension opening structure use of foreign capital (x16) actual use of foreign capital/GRP % positive
    degree of dependence on foreign trade (x17) total import and export volume/GRP % positive
    Shared development dimension regional sharing regional income sharing level (x18) per capita GRP at prefecture level/per capita GRP at provincial level % positive
    welfare change per capita GRP (x19) yuan positive

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The first dimension is the innovative development dimension. In this dimension, the secondary indicators are composed of R&D investment, R&D result, and education input. R&D investment has two basic indicators, R&D intensity and public budget on science and technology expenditure, which refer to the investment of R&D entities and the government's investment, respectively. The R&D result adopts the number of licensed patent as the basic indicator, which shows the output of R&D. Education input takes the proportion of education expenditure in the public budget as a basic indicator, which reflects the potential of R&D.

    The second dimension is the coordinated development dimension. In this dimension, the secondary indicators are composed of coordination of industrial structure, coordination of investment and consumption structure, and coordination of urban and rural areas. Coordination of industrial structure consists of the proportion of the secondary industry and the proportion of the tertiary industry. Coordination of investment and consumption structure consists of investment rate and consumption rate. For the two rates, the higher is not the better. Xiang [45] believes that it is more appropriate that the investment rate is lower than 38% and the consumption rate is higher than or equal to 60%. Based on this standard, it can be inferred that investment-to-consumption ratio should be lower than 63.3%. Therefore, investment rate and consumption rate are regarded as positive indicators, and investment-to-consumption ratio, a moderate indicator whose standard is lower than 63.3%, is utilized for adjustment. Coordination of urban and rural areas takes urban-rural income ratio as its basic indicator, which is a negative indicator and shown as "per capita disposable income of urban residents/per capita disposable income of rural residents".

    The third dimension is the green development dimension, whose indicators are consistent with the previous ones of low carbon economy.

    The fourth dimension is the open development dimension. In this dimension, the secondary indicator is composed of an opening structure. An opening structure consists of two basic indicators, namely the use of foreign capital and the degree of dependence on foreign trade, which reflect the concept of economic openness. The use of foreign capital is shown as "actual use of foreign capital/GRP", and the degree of dependence on foreign trade is represented as "total import and export volume/GRP".

    The fifth dimension is the shared development dimension. In this dimension, the secondary indicators are composed of regional sharing and welfare change. According to Wei and Li [41,42], the regional income sharing level refers to the ratio of per capita GRP at a prefecture level to per capita GRP at a provincial level, and welfare change takes per capita GRP as its basic indicator.

    In this paper, the entropy value method and the multi-objective linear weighted function method, which are commonly used in academia, are utilized to measure the quality of economic growth of cities in the Pearl River Delta. Specific steps are as follows:

    The first step is to standardize the variables. The measurement indicator xij is standardized through the range method, which can eliminate the influence of quantity variance and dimension difference on the measurement indicator.

    Xij={xijmin(xij)max(xij)min(xij)(When xij is a positive indicator)max(xij)xijmax(xij)min(xij)(When xij is a negative indicator). (1)

    In the above formulas, i represents city, j basic indicator, and xij and Xij original basic indicator and standardized basic indicator respectively.

    If the indicator is a moderate one, it should be standardized in line with the following reference standards:

    xij={zijz0(when zij>z0, the more zij is greater than z0, the better)z0zij(when zij<z0, the more zij is less than z0, the better). (2)

    In these formulas, zij is a moderate indicator, and z0 is the reference standard of a moderate indicator. The new transformed indicator should be standardized through the method of positive indicators as is shown in formula (1).

    The second step is to calculate the information entropy Ej with standardized indicator Xij.

    Ej=kni=1(Xijni=1XijlnXijni=1Xij). (3)

    In this formula, k = 1/ln(N). The data in this paper are all panel data, so N means the total number of samples.

    The third step is to calculate the weight Wj of each basic indicator with the information entropy Ej.

    Wj=(1Ej)mj=1(1Ej). (4)

    In this formula, 1-Ej represents the information utility value of the jth indicator.

    The fourth step is to calculate the quality of economic growth indicator QEG in the multi-objective linear weighted function.

    QEG=mj=1WjXij. (5)

    The value range of the quality of economic growth indicator QEG is (0, 1), and the larger the value, the higher the quality of economic growth of the city.

    According to the research needs and data availability, we selected the data of various prefecture-level cities in Guangdong Province from 2008 to 2019, which are mainly from China City Statistical Yearbook, Guangdong Statistical Yearbook, and the Statistical Yearbook of various prefecture-level cities in Guangdong. For some missing data, they were replaced by the average value (or the mean) of calculations with the series mean method, the proximal point mean method, the proximal point median method, the linear interpolation method, and the linear trend method at certain points.

    (1) Urban-rural income ratio. As for the coordination of urban-rural areas, the secondary indicator in coordinated development dimension, when calculating the urban-rural income ratio, the per capita rural income was also the per capita net income of rural residents in some areas before 2013. Since there was no relevant statistics on rural residents in Shenzhen, the urban-rural income ratio in Shenzhen was replaced by the average value of Guangdong Province from 2003 to 2013. After 2014, the Pearl River Delta has collected relevant data, and then the urban-rural income ratio in Shenzhen is replaced by the mean of the data of the Pearl River Delta from 2014 to 2019.

    (2) Environmental pollution. Environmental pollution, the second indicator in green development dimension, consists of four basic indicators, namely waste water discharge, industrial waste gas emission, industrial fume (dust) emission, and industrial solid waste production. When it is calculated, relative indicators are used in the measurement, that is, per unit (ten thousand yuan or yuan) GRP discharge or emission (ton or M³).

    (3) The sum of actual use of foreign capital and total import and export volume. When the basic indicators in open development dimension are measured and calculated, the sum of actual use of foreign capital and total import and export volume should be converted to Chinese yuan based on the average exchange rate for that year in Guangdong Province.

    The σ convergence of quality of economic growth (low carbon economy) refers to the trend that the gap of quality of economic growth (low carbon economy) between various regions gradually narrows over time, and it is usually measured by the coefficient of variation as follows:

    σrt=[nri=1(QEGitQEGrt)2]/nrQEGrt. (6)

    The variable is QEG when measuring quality of economic growth and is LCE when measuring low carbon economy, the same below.

    r refers to the region, and nr represents the number of prefecture-level cities in r region. Coefficient of variation is the ratio of standard deviation to the mean of quality of economic growth (low carbon economy) indicator in the prefecture-level city of the region (r).

    The β convergence of quality of economic growth (low carbon economy) refers to the trend that the gap of growth rates of economic growth quality (low carbon economy) between various regions gradually narrows over time, and the β convergence model based on standard panel data model is as follows:

    ln(QEGi,t+1QEGi,t)=α+βlnQEGit+δXit+μi+γt+ϵit. (7)

    When δ = 0, it is an absolute β convergence model; when δ≠0, it is a conditional β convergence model. The government is regarded as an import factor that affects quality of economic growth (low carbon economy); therefore, it is defined as a major control variable. When β is significantly less than 0, convergence exists, and convergence rate is ln(1+β)T. On the contrary, divergence exists.

    The club convergence of quality of economic growth (low carbon economy) refers to the convergence of regions with similar characteristics. According to the division of economic regions in Guangdong Province in the Guangdong Statistical Yearbook, we divide economic regions in Guangdong Province into the Pearl River Delta, the East Wing, the West Wing and the mountain area. According to Opinions on Constructing the New Development Pattern of "One Core, One Belt, One Area" and Promoting Coordinated Regional Development of Guangdong Province (July, 2019) issued by Guangdong Provincial Party Committee and the People's Government of Guangdong Province, this paper divides economic regions in Guangdong Province into One Core (the Pearl River Delta), One Belt (the coastal economic belt), and One Area (the northern ecological development area). The convergences of these "clubs" are analyzed separately.

    It is difficult to directly observe governmental influence. However, the amount of fiscal expenditure reflects the ability of the government to regulate and intervene in the economy, so fiscal expenditure is chosen as a substitute variable for governmental influence. The relevant variable data is the data of various prefecture-level cities in Guangdong Province from 2008 to 2019, mainly collected from the China City Statistical Yearbook, Guangdong Statistical Yearbook and the statistical yearbooks of various prefecture-level cities. The descriptive statistics of the main variables of the model are shown in Table 3.

    Table 3.  Descriptive statistics of the main variables.
    Variables Meaning Measured value Mean Standard deviation Median Minimum Maximum
    LCE(D3) low carbon economy indicator (score in green development dimension) 231 0.0182 0.0029 0.0188 0.0063 0.0230
    lnLCE logarithm of low carbon economy indicator 231 -4.0229 0.1960 -3.9734 -5.0654 -3.7714
    ln(LCEi,t+1LCEi,t) growth rate of low carbon economy 231 0.0257 0.0690 0.0157 -0.1870 0.4242
    QEG growth quality indicator 231 0.2242 0.1175 0.1650 0.0893 0.6832
    lnQEG logarithm of growth quality indicator 231 -1.6132 0.4716 -1.8015 -2.4155 -0.3810
    ln(QEGi,t+1QEGi,t) growth rate of economic quality 231 0.0153 0.0564 0.0189 -0.2408 0.2447
    D1 score in innovative development dimension 231 0.0536 0.0503 0.0317 0.0122 0.3601
    D2 score in coordinated development dimension 231 0.0633 0.0125 0.0618 0.0368 0.1077
    D4 score in open development dimension 231 0.0415 0.0371 0.0294 0.0005 0.1968
    D5 score in shared development dimension 231 0.0475 0.0479 0.0225 0.0010 0.1869
    lnPFE public fiscal expenditure 231 5.4648 0.9156 5.3735 3.6225 8.4325

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The σ convergence of low carbon economy divided by economic regions of Guangdong Province is shown in Figure 1. From Figure 1, we can see that the σ convergence coefficient of the low carbon economy in the province is generally declining, indicating that σ convergence appears in the data of low carbon economy in the province, and the regional imbalance of the low carbon economy in the province tends to decrease. The σ convergence coefficients of low carbon economy in the Pearl River Delta, the East Wing and the mountain areas show an overall downward trend, and the σ convergence coefficient of the low carbon economy in the West Wing increases before the year of 2016, but also tends to decline since then, indicating that σ convergence appears in the data of the regions, and the regional imbalance of low carbon economy tends to decrease.

    Figure 1.  σ convergences of low carbon economy divided by economic regions in Guangdong Province.

    Figure 2 showed the σ convergence of quality of economic growth various economic regions of Guangdong Province. It can be seen from Figure 2 that the overall σ convergence coefficient of quality of economic growth was on the rise, indicating that there was no σ convergence in the data of the province and that its regional imbalance in quality of economic growth was obvious. The overall σ convergence coefficient of the Pearl River Delta showed an upward trend, indicating that there was no σ convergence in the data of the Pearl River Delta and that its regional imbalance in quality of economic growth was obvious. Although the σ convergence coefficients in the East Wing and the mountain area increased slightly in some years, they showed a downward trend on the whole, indicating that σ convergence occurred in the data of both the East Wing and the mountain area and that the regional imbalance of quality of economic growth in the two regions tended to be improved. The σ convergence coefficient in the data of the West Wing fluctuated greatly, and there was also a relatively large fluctuation from 2018 to 2019, indicating that there was no σ convergence in the data of the West Wing and that its regional imbalance in the quality of economic growth was obvious.

    Figure 2.  σ convergences of quality of economic growth various economic regions in Guangdong Province.

    There was no σ convergence in the data of quality of economic growth of Guangdong Province, which meant the regional imbalance in quality of economic growth in the province was obvious. With further analysis of the σ convergences of the province's five dimensions (see Figure A1), the main reason should be that the regional imbalances in innovative, open, and shared development dimensions were quite obvious. In particular, the regional imbalance in innovative development dimension had a tendency to further expand. It can be explained that the gap between the Pearl River Delta and other regions tended to widen because the Pearl River Delta had more favorable conditions of agglomerating innovative elements than other regions. Figure A2 showed the trends of the mean of innovative development dimension in the Pearl River Delta and in the non-Pearl River Delta region and the gap between them. It is clear that the gap between the two regions continued to widen.

    There was no σ convergence in the data of the Pearl River Delta, which meant the regional imbalance in quality of economic growth in the Pearl River Delta was obvious. With further analysis of the σ convergences of the five dimensions of the Pearl River Delta (see Figure A3), the main reason should be that the regional imbalances in innovative, open, and shared development dimensions were quite obvious. In particular, the regional imbalance of innovative development dimension had a trend to further expand. This may be because the gap between Guangzhou and Shenzhen and other regions in the Pearl River Delta tended to widen due to the favorable conditions of agglomerating innovative elements in Guangzhou and Shenzhen. Figure A4 showed the trends of the mean of innovative development dimension in Guangzhou and Shenzhen and in other regions in the Pearl River Delta and the gap between them. It is clear that the gap continued to widen.

    Although the regional imbalance in quality of economic growth in the East Wing got slightly worse in some certain years, its overall situation tended to improve. With further analysis of the σ convergences of the five dimensions of the East Wing (see Figure A5), it can be concluded that obvious regional imbalance in quality of economic growth appeared in the innovative, open, coordinated, and shared development dimensions in the East Wing. The regional imbalance in shared development dimension had the most obvious narrowing trend; and the regional imbalance in innovative and open development dimensions fluctuated greatly.

    The regional imbalance in quality of economic growth in the West Wing was obvious and fluctuated greatly. With further analysis of the σ convergences of the five dimensions of the West Wing (see Figure A6), the main reason can be concluded that the regional imbalance in open development dimension was obvious and had a relatively high fluctuation while the regional imbalance in other four dimensions was not obvious and had a downward trend.

    Although the regional imbalance in quality of economic growth in the mountain area got slightly worse in some certain years, its overall situation tended to improve. With further analysis of the σ convergences of the five dimensions of the West Wing (see Figure A7), it can be concluded that obvious regional imbalance in quality of economic growth appeared in innovative and open development dimensions in the West Wing. Moreover, the regional imbalance in innovative and open development dimensions had a relatively severe fluctuation; and the regional imbalance in shared development dimension had the most obvious narrowing trend.

    The σ convergences of low carbon economy of regions divided into "One Core, One Belt, One Area" are shown in Figure 3. It can be seen from Figure 3 that the σ convergence coefficient of each region shows an overall downward trend, indicating that there is a σ convergence in the data of each region, and the regional imbalance of the low-carbon economy tends to narrow.

    Figure 3.  σ convergences of low carbon economy of regions divided into "One Core, One Belt, One Area".

    The σ convergences of quality of economic growth of regions divided into "One Core, One Belt, One Area" are shown in Figure 4. It can be seen from Figure 4 that the σ convergence coefficient of the coastal economic belt generally showed an upward trend from 2008 to 2019, which meant there was no σ convergence in the data of the coastal economic belt, and its regional imbalance in the quality of economic growth was obvious.

    Figure 4.  σ convergences of quality of economic growth of regions divided into "One Core, One Belt, One Area".

    "One Core" and "One Area" correspond to the Pearl River Delta and the mountain area respectively, which have been analyzed in previous part, so they are not analyzed in this part.

    With further analysis of the σ convergences of the five dimensions of economic growth quality of the coastal economic belt (see Figure A8), the main reason for its regional imbalance in quality of economic growth should be that the regional imbalance in innovative, open, and shared development dimensions was quite obvious. In particular, the regional imbalance in innovative development dimension had a tendency to further expand. This might have the following reasons: First, the gap between the seven coastal cities in the Pearl River Delta and the East and West Wings tended to widen in innovative development dimension. Figure A9 showed the trends of the mean of innovative development dimension of the seven coastal cities in the Pearl River Delta and the East and West Wings. Second, in terms of the seven coastal cities in the Pearl River Delta, the gap between Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and the other five coastal cities in the Pearl River Delta tended to widen in innovative development dimension. Figure A10 showed the trend of the mean of innovative development dimension in Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and the other five coastal cities in the Pearl River Delta. Third, obvious imbalance also appeared in innovative development dimension in the East and West Wings. Figure A11 showed the trends of the mean of innovative development dimension in the East and West Wings, and from the figure, it can be seen that the gap between these two regions had a fluctuation and a growing trend as well.

    Tables 4 and 5 showed the Hausman test results of the absolute β convergence model of low carbon economy, and from the x2 value, it is more appropriate to choose the fixed effect model and reject the null hypothesis that there is no systematic difference in coefficients (i.e., ai is not correlated with xit, and random effects model should be chosen) at a significant level of 1%. Table 4 shows the estimated results of absolute β convergence of low carbon economy of different economic regions. According to the estimated results, the β coefficients of the absolute convergence model of the province and the subregions are all negative, which is significant at the 1% level, indicating that there is absolute β convergence in the data of the province and the subregions, and the growth rate of the low carbon economy is gradually converging. Table 4 shows the estimated absolute β convergence of the low carbon economy of regions divided into the "One Core, One Belt, One Area", and from the estimated results, the β coefficient of the absolute convergence model of the coastal economic belt is negative, which is significant at the 1% level, indicating that there is absolute β convergence in the data of the coastal economic belt, and the growth rate of the low carbon economy is gradually converging.

    Table 4.  Estimated results of absolute β convergence model of low carbon economy (of various economic regions).
    Variables Guangdong Province Pearl River Delta East Wing West Wing Mountain area
    β -0.2329*** -0.2511*** -0.2138*** -0.3382*** -0.2304***
    (-7.3841) (-5.3896) (-5.0191) (-2.8374) (-3.3772)
    Constants -0.9114*** -0.9744*** -0.8278*** -1.3220*** -0.9245***
    (-7.1782) (-5.3075) (-4.8397) (-2.8090) (-3.2038)
    Individual effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Time effect Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Hausman test 7.82***
    sigma_u 0.0195 0.0131 0.0053 0.0268 0.0207
    sigma_e 0.0622 0.0245 0.0329 0.0430 0.1157
    R2 0.2069 0.2461 0.3924 0.2173 0.1888
    N 231 99 44 33 55
    Note: Figures in parentheses are t statistics; Hausman test here refers to the χ2 value of Hausman test; *, **, and *** refer to the significant level of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 5.  Estimated results of absolute β convergence model of low carbon economy (of "One Core, One Belt, One Area").
    Variables Guangdong Province Pearl River Delta Coastal economic belt Northern ecological development area
    β -0.2329*** -0.2511*** -0.2316*** -0.2304***
    (-7.3841) (-5.3896) (-7.1835) (-3.3772)
    Constants -0.9114*** -0.9744*** -0.8991*** -0.9245***
    (-7.1782) (-5.3075) (-7.0374) (-3.2038)
    Individual effects Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Time effect Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Hausman test 7.82***
    sigma_u 0.0195 0.0131 0.0120 0.0207
    sigma_e 0.0622 0.0245 0.0307 0.1157
    R2 0.2069 0.2461 0.2707 0.1888
    N 231 99 154 55
    Note: Figures in parentheses are t statistics; Hausman test here refers to the x2 value of Hausman test; *, **, and *** refer to the significant level of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Tables 6 and 7 show the Hausman test results of the absolute β convergence model of quality of economic growth, and according to the results, it is more appropriate to choose the fixed effect model. Table 6 shows the estimated results of absolute β convergence of various economic regions in Guangdong. According to the estimated results, the β coefficient of the absolute convergence model of Guangdong Province was negative and significant at the 1% level, indicating that there was absolute β convergence in the data of the province and that the growth rates of economic quality gradually converged. The β coefficient of the absolute convergence model of the Pearl River Delta was insignificantly positive, indicating that there was no absolute β convergence in the data of the Pearl River Delta. The β coefficients of the absolute convergence models of the East Wing, the West Wing, and the mountain area were all negative and significant at the 5% level, indicating that there were absolute β convergences in the data of the East Wing, the West Wing, and the mountain area, and that the growth rates of economic quality gradually converged. Table 7 showed the estimated results of absolute β convergence of regions divided into "One Core, One Belt, One Area". The results showed that the β coefficients of the absolute convergence model of the coastal economic belt are all negative and significant at the 5% level, indicating that there is absolute β convergence in the data of the coastal economic belt and that the growth rates of economic quality gradually converged.

    Table 6.  Estimated results of absolute β convergence model of quality of economic growth (of various economic regions).
    Variables Guangdong Province Pearl River Delta East Wing West Wing Mountain area
    β -0.1745*** 0.0107 -0.3177*** -0.2269** -0.3773***
    (-4.3876) (0.2027) (-3.0155) (-2.2221) (-4.4361)
    Constants -0.2663*** 0.0307 -0.5972*** -0.4514** -0.7226***
    (-4.1426) (0.5089) (-2.9565) (-2.1130) (-4.3814)
    Individual effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Time effect Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Hausman test 20.69***
    sigma_u 0.0889 0.0189 0.0328 0.0192 0.0420
    sigma_e 0.0539 0.0459 0.0416 0.0695 0.0578
    R2 0.0843 0.0005 0.1891 0.1455 0.2865
    N 231 99 44 33 55
    Note: Figures in parentheses are t statistics; Hausman test here refers to the χ2 value of Hausman test; *, **, and *** refer to the significant level of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 7.  Estimated results of absolute β convergence model of quality of economic growth (of "One Core, One Belt, One Area").
    Variables Guangdong Province Pearl River Delta Coastal economic belt Northern ecological development area
    β -0.1745*** 0.0107 -0.1202** -0.3773***
    (-4.3876) (0.2027) (-2.5908) (-4.4361)
    Constants -0.2663*** 0.0307 -0.1647** -0.7226***
    (-4.1426) (0.5089) (-2.3176) (-4.3814)
    Individual effects Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Time effect Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Hausman test 20.69***
    sigma_u 0.0889 0.0189 0.0679 0.0420
    sigma_e 0.0539 0.0459 0.0507 0.0578
    R2 0.0843 0.0005 0.0461 0.2865
    N 231 99 154 55
    Note: Figures in parentheses are t statistics; Hausman test here refers to the χ2 value of Hausman test; *, **, and *** refer to the significant level of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    According to the estimated results of the five dimensions of quality of economic growth in Guangdong Province (see Table A1), the β coefficients of the absolute convergence model of the five dimensions were all negative and significant at the 1% level, indicating that there were absolute β convergences in the data of the five dimensions of Guangdong Province and that their growth rates of economic quality gradually converged. According to the estimated results of the five dimensions of quality of economic growth in the Pearl River Delta (see Table A2), the β coefficients of the absolute convergence model of the coordinated, green, and shared development dimensions were all negative and significant at the 1% level, and the β coefficient of the absolute convergence model of the innovative development dimension was negative and significant at the 10% level, which indicated that the growth rates of the innovative, coordinated, green, and shared development dimensions of the Pearl River Delta gradually converged. The β coefficient of the absolute convergence model of the open development dimension was insignificantly negative, indicating that there was no absolute convergence in the growth rate of the open development dimension of the Pearl River Delta.

    According to the estimated results of the five dimensions of quality of economic growth in the East Wing (see Table A3), the β coefficients of the absolute convergence model of the innovative, coordinated, green (LCE), and shared development dimensions were negative and significant at the 1% level, indicating that the growth rates of economic quality of these four dimensions gradually converged. The β coefficient of the absolute convergence model of the open development dimension was insignificantly negative, indicating that there was no absolute convergence in the growth rate of the open development dimension of the East Wing. Moreover, according to the estimated results of the five dimensions of the West Wing (see Table A4), the β coefficients of the absolute convergence model of the five development dimensions were all negative. The β coefficient of the absolute convergence model was significant at the 5% level in the coordinated development dimension and at the 1% level in the other four dimensions, which indicated that the growth rates of economic quality of the five dimensions in West Wing gradually converged.

    According to the estimated results of the five dimensions of quality of economic growth in the mountain area (see Table A5), the β coefficients of the absolute convergence model of the five development dimensions were all negative. The β coefficient of the absolute convergence model was significant at the 5% level in the open development dimension and at the 1% level in the other four dimensions, which indicated that the growth rates of economic quality of the five dimensions in West Wing gradually converged. Furthermore, according to the estimated results of the five dimensions of the coastal economic belt (see Table A6), the β coefficients of the absolute convergence model of the five development dimensions were all negative and significant at the 1% level, which indicated that the growth rates of economic quality of the five dimensions in the coastal economic belt gradually converged.

    Tables 8 and 9 show the Hausman test results of the conditional β convergence model of low carbon economy. From the value of χ2, it is more appropriate to choose a fixed-effect model to reject the null hypothesis that there is no systematic difference in coefficients at a significant level of 1%. Tables 8 and 9 show the conditional β convergence estimates categorized by economic regions and "One Core, One Belt, One Area", respectively. From the estimated results, the β coefficients of the provincial and regional conditional convergence models are negative, which is significant at the 1% level, indicating that there is a conditional β convergence in the data of Guangdong Province and the regions, and that the growth rate of the low carbon economy is gradually converging. According to the convergence rate formula, the convergence rate of Guangdong Province is 0.0364, the Pearl River Delta (One Core) 0.0703, the East Wing 0.0373, the West Wing 0.0443, the mountain area (One Area) 0.0721, and the coastal economic belt 0.0357.

    Table 8.  Estimated results of conditional β convergence model of low carbon economy (of various economic regions).
    Variables Guangdong Province Pearl River Delta East Wing West Wing Mountain area
    β -0.3302*** -0.5385*** -0.3366*** -0.3857** -0.5474***
    (-7.4553) (-6.9107) (-3.5979) (-2.6611) (-4.4519)
    lnPFE 0.0349*** 0.0383*** 0.0301 0.0104 0.1599***
    (3.0686) (4.3971) (1.4694) (0.5898) (3.0061)
    Constants -1.4937*** -2.3381*** -1.4676*** -1.5629** -3.0765***
    (-6.5815) (-6.6362) (-3.1434) (-2.4918) (-4.0257)
    Individual effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Time effect Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Hausman test 15.72***
    sigma_u 0.0303 0.0146 0.0071 0.0275 0.0848
    sigma_e 0.0609 0.0223 0.0325 0.0435 0.1073
    R2 0.2413 0.3819 0.4251 0.2269 0.3173
    N 231 99 44 33 55
    Convergence rate 0.0364 0.0703 0.0373 0.0443 0.0721
    Note: Figures in parentheses are t statistics; Hausman test here refers to the χ2 value of Hausman test; *, **, and *** refer to the significant level of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 9.  Estimated results of conditional β convergence model of low carbon economy (of "One Core, One Belt, One Area").
    Variables Guangdong Province Pearl River Delta Coastal economic belt Northern ecological development area
    β -0.3302*** -0.5385*** -0.3250*** -0.5474***
    (-7.4553) (-6.9107) (-6.6772) (-4.4519)
    lnPFE 0.0349*** 0.0383*** 0.0186** 0.1599***
    (3.0686) (4.3971) (2.5246) (3.0061)
    Constants -1.4937*** -2.3381*** -1.3724*** -3.0765***
    (-6.5815) (-6.6362) (-6.0854) (-4.0257)
    Individual effects Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Time effect Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Hausman test 15.72***
    sigma_u 0.0303 0.0146 0.0128 0.0848
    sigma_e 0.0609 0.0223 0.0301 0.1073
    R2 0.2413 0.3819 0.3029 0.3173
    N 231 99 154 55
    Convergence rate 0.0364 0.0703 0.0357 0.0721
    Note: Figures in parentheses are t statistics; Hausman test here refers to the χ2 value of Hausman test; *, **, and *** refer to the significant level of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Tables 10 and 11 show the Hausman test results of the conditional β convergence model of quality of economic growth. According to the results, it was more appropriate to choose the fixed-effect model. Table 10 showed the estimated results of conditional β convergence of regions divided into various economic regions. According to the estimated results, the β coefficient of the conditional convergence model of Guangdong Province was negative and significant at the 1% level, indicating that there was conditional β convergence in the data of the province and that the growth rates of economic quality gradually converged. The β coefficient of the conditional convergence model of the Pearl River Delta was insignificantly negative, indicating that there was no conditional β convergence in the data of the Pearl River Delta. The β coefficients of the conditional convergence models in the East Wing, West Wing, and the mountain area were all negative and significant at the 5% level, indicating that there was conditional β convergence in the East Wing, West Wing, and the mountain area and that their growth rates of economic quality gradually converged. According to the convergence rate formula, the convergence rates of Guangdong Province, the East Wing, the West Wing, and the mountain area were 0.0254, 0.0319, 0.0657, and 0.0500, respectively. Table 11 showed the estimated results of conditional β convergence of regions divided into "One Core, One Belt, One Area". According to the estimated results, the β coefficients of the conditional convergence model of the coastal economic belt were all negative and significant at the 1% level, indicating that there was conditional β convergence in data of the coastal economic belt and that the growth rates of economic quality gradually converged. According to the convergence rate formula, the convergence rate of the coastal economic belt was 0.0204.

    Table 10.  Estimated results of the conditional β convergence model of quality of economic growth (of various economic regions).
    Variables Guangdong Province Pearl River Delta East Wing West Wing Mountain area
    β -0.2436*** -0.0694 -0.2963** -0.5144** -0.4231***
    (-5.1577) (-1.0082) (-2.5859) (-2.5889) (-4.8011)
    lnPFE 0.0219*** 0.0227* -0.0065 0.0758 0.0251
    (2.6258) (1.7799) (-0.5041) (1.6693) (1.6445)
    Constants -0.4975*** -0.1975 -0.5247** -1.4451** -0.9393***
    (-4.5851) (-1.3974) (-2.1022) (-2.2926) (-4.4961)
    Individual effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Time effect Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Hausman test 30.23***
    sigma_u 0.1082 0.0250 0.0307 0.0916 0.0518
    sigma_e 0.0532 0.0453 0.0420 0.0674 0.0568
    R2 0.1137 0.0352 0.1945 0.2228 0.3246
    N 231 99 44 33 55
    Convergence rate 0.0254 0.0319 0.0657 0.0500
    Note: Figures in parentheses are t statistics; Hausman test here refers to the χ2 value of Hausman test; *, **, and *** refer to the significant level of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 11.  Estimated results of the conditional β convergence model of quality of economic growth (of "One Core, One Belt, One Area").
    Variables Guangdong Province Pearl River Delta Coastal economic belt Northern ecological development area
    β -0.2436*** -0.0694 -0.2008*** -0.4231***
    (-5.1577) (-1.0082) (-3.1038) (-4.8011)
    lnPFE 0.0219*** 0.0227* 0.0199* 0.0251
    (2.6258) (1.7799) (1.7736) (1.6445)
    Constants -0.4975*** -0.1975 -0.3989*** -0.9393***
    (-4.5851) (-1.3974) (-2.6647) (-4.4961)
    Individual effects Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Time effect Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Hausman test 30.23***
    sigma_u 0.1082 0.0250 0.0959 0.0518
    sigma_e 0.0532 0.0453 0.0503 0.0568
    R2 0.1137 0.0352 0.0673 0.3246
    N 231 99 154 55
    Convergence rate 0.0254 0.0204 0.0500
    Note: Figures in parentheses are t statistics; Hausman test here refers to the χ2 value of Hausman test; *, **, and *** refer to the significant level of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    According to the estimated results of quality of economic growth in the five dimensions of Guangdong Province (see Table A7), the β coefficients of the conditional convergence model of the five dimensions were all negative and significant at the 1% level, indicating that there was conditional β convergence in the data of the five dimensions of Guangdong Province and that their growth rates of economic quality gradually converged. The convergence rates of the five dimensions were 0.0376, 0.0584, 0.0364, 0.0634, and 0.0331, respectively. According to the estimated results of quality of economic growth in the five dimensions of the Pearl River Delta (see Table A8), the β coefficients of the conditional convergence model of the innovative, coordinated, green, and shared development dimensions were all negative and significant at the 1% level, indicating that their growth rates of economic quality gradually converged. The convergence rates of these four dimensions were 0.0320, 0.0516, 0.0703, and 0.0214, respectively. The β coefficient of the conditional convergence model of the open development dimension was insignificantly negative, indicating that there was neither absolute β convergence nor conditional β convergence in quality of economic growth of the Pearl River Delta. With further analysis, the main reason why absolute and conditional β convergences did not appear in the data of the Pearl River Delta was that there was neither absolute β convergence nor conditional β convergence in the data of the open development dimension while they both appeared in the data of the other four dimensions. The advantages and conditions of opening to the outside world were quite different among the cities in the Pearl River Delta. Guangzhou and Shenzhen continued to expand their opening-up advantages by virtue of their favorable conditions. While Zhaoqing and Jiangmen also continued to expand their opening to the outside world, the speed of opening was difficult to catch up with that of Guangzhou and Shenzhen due to the limitations of basic conditions and geographical locations and some other reasons.

    According to the estimated results of quality of economic growth in the five dimensions of the East Wing (see Table A9), the β coefficients of the conditional convergence model of the five dimensions were all negative and significant at the 1% level, indicating that there was conditional β convergence in the data of the East Wing and that the growth rates of economic quality of the five dimensions gradually converged. The convergence rates of the five dimensions were 0.1391, 0.0382, 0.0373, 0.1193, and 0.0404, respectively. Moreover, according to the estimated results of quality of economic growth in the five dimensions of the West Wing (see Table A10), the β coefficients of the conditional convergence model of the innovative, coordinated, green, and open development dimensions were negative and significant at the 1% level, indicating that the growth rates of economic quality of these four dimensions in West Wing gradually converged. The convergence rates of the four dimensions were 0.1533, 0.0533, 0.0443, and 0.1836, respectively. The β coefficient of the conditional convergence model of the shared development was insignificantly negative, indicating that there was no conditional convergence in the data of the shared development dimension in the West Wing.

    According to the estimated results of quality of economic growth in the five dimensions of the mountain area (see Table A11), the β coefficients of the conditional convergence model of the five development dimensions were all negative and significant at the 1% level, indicating that there was conditional β convergence in the data of the mountain area and that their growth rates gradually converged. The convergence rates of the five dimensions were 0.0583, 0.0759, 0.0721, 0.0575, and 0.0430, respectively. Furthermore, according to the estimated results of quality of economic growth in the five dimensions of the coastal economic belt (see Table A12), the β coefficients of the conditional convergence model of the five development dimensions were all negative and significant at the 1% level, indicating that there was conditional β convergence in the data of the coastal economic belt and that their growth rates gradually converged. The convergence rates of the five dimensions were 0.0435, 0.0340, 0.0357, 0.1058, and 0.0332, respectively.

    From the above analysis, some obvious differences between the "clubs" can be summarized as follows:

    The first difference is in σ convergence. In terms of various economic regions, σ convergence appears in the data of both the East Wing and the mountain area, and the regional imbalance in quality of economic growth tends to be improved. On the contrary, σ convergence appears neither in the data of the Pearl River Delta nor in the data of the West Wing, and the regional imbalance in quality of economic growth in these regions is obvious. In particular, the σ convergence coefficient of the West Wing fluctuates greatly. In terms of "One Core, One Belt, One Area", σ convergence appears in the data of the northern ecological development area, and the regional imbalance of quality of economic growth tends to be improved. On the contrary, σ convergence appears neither in the data of the core region nor in the data of the coastal economic belt, and the regional imbalance of quality of economic growth is obvious. In terms of the five dimensions, each dimension varies greatly in all regions.

    The second difference lies in β convergence. "Club difference" exists in convergence rates of low carbon economy of all regions mentioned. Regarding quality of economic growth, in the Pearl River Delta, there is no absolute β convergence or conditional β convergence. In the East Wing, the West Wing, and the mountain area, there are both absolute β convergence and conditional β convergence, and their growth rates of economic quality gradually converge. Their convergence rates are 0.0319, 0.0657, and 0.0500, respectively, and "club difference" shows in the convergence rates. In the coastal economic belt and the northern ecological development area, there are both absolute β convergence and conditional β convergence, and their growth rates of economic quality gradually converge. Their convergence rates are 0.0204, and 0.0500, respectively, and "club difference" shows in the convergence rates. From the perspective of the five dimensions, in the open development dimension, absolute convergence appears neither in data of the Pearl River Delta nor in the data of the East Wing, and no conditional convergence appears in the data of the Pearl River Delta; and in the shared development dimension, no conditional convergence appears in the data of the West Wing.

    Based on the samples of 21 prefecture-level cities in Guangdong Province, we adopt the entropy method to measure the quality of economic growth, and analyze the coefficient of variation and panel data convergence model with fixed effects.

    Our major findings are as follows:

    (1) Convergence of low carbon economy performs better than that of quality of economic growth.

    (2) Low carbon economy of Guangdong Province shows a σ convergence tendency, and the regional imbalance in low carbon economy tends to be alleviated. There is no σ convergence in quality of economic growth of Guangdong Province, and the regional imbalance in quality of economic growth in the province is obvious. In terms of quality of economic growth of different regions, σ convergence appears in the data of the East Wing and the mountain area (northern ecological development area), not in the data of the Pearl River Delta (core region), the West Wing, or the coastal economic belt ("One Belt"); and especially in the West Wing, the σ convergence coefficient of the West Wing fluctuates greatly. In terms of quality of economic growth in the five dimensions, each dimension varies greatly in all regions.

    (3) There are both absolute and conditional β convergences in low carbon economy and quality of economic growth of Guangdong Province. Also, the quality of economic growth in all the five dimensions appear absolute and conditional β convergences. In terms of quality of economic growth of different regions, no absolute β convergence or conditional β convergence appears in the data of the Pearl River Delta (core region), and there is no absolute or conditional β convergence in the data of the open development dimension. Absolute and conditional β convergences appear in the data of the East Wing, the West Wing, the mountain area (northern ecological development area), and the coastal economic belt. Except that there is no absolute β convergence in the data of the open development dimension of the East Wing, and no conditional β convergence in the data of the shared development dimension of the West Wing, absolute and conditional β convergences appear in the data of the other four dimensions of the East Wing, the West Wing, the mountain area (northern ecological development area), and the coastal economic belt.

    (4) "Club difference" exists in convergence rates of low carbon economy of all regions mentioned. "Club difference" shows in the σ convergence, absolute β convergence, conditional β convergence, and five-dimensional convergence of quality of economic growth in various regions in Guangdong Province. This paper helps to better grasp the changing regularities of low carbon economy, quality of economic growth and their convergences, enrich related research, and provide reference for the formulation of urban and regional economic policies and the realization of high-quality economic development and "double carbon goal" of China.

    The major implications are as follows: First, when seeking development, attention should be given to the overall and balanced improvement of the low carbon economy (green development) and for four dimensions, namely innovative, coordinated, open, and shared development, and importance should be attached to the balanced development of the five dimensions so as to achieve the comprehensive improvement of quality of economic growth. Second, the regional imbalance in quality of economic growth should be prevented, and the imbalance in quality of economic growth among regions should be gradually reduced in order to achieve coordinated development and enhance the overall quality and comprehensive competitiveness of the economy in Guangdong Province. Third, providing the actual situation in Guangdong Province, the gap between the Pearl River Delta and other regions in Guangdong Province needs to be narrowed, and so does the gap between the different areas within the Pearl River Delta, the East Wing, the West Wing, the mountain area (the northern ecological development area), and the coastal economic belt.

    The authors declare that they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.

    Figure A1.  σ convergences of the five dimensions of quality of economic growth of Guangdong Province.
    Figure A2.  Innovation gap between the Pearl River Delta and the non-Pearl River Delta region.
    Figure A3.  σ convergences of the five dimensions of quality of economic growth of the Pearl River Delta.
    Figure A4.  Innovation gap between Guangzhou and Shenzhen and other regions in the Pearl River Delta.
    Figure A5.  σ convergences of the five dimensions of quality of economic growth of the East Wing.
    Figure A6.  σ convergences of the five dimensions of quality of economic growth of the West Wing.
    Figure A7.  σ convergences of the five dimensions of quality of economic growth of the mountain area.
    Figure A8.  σ convergences of the five dimensions of quality of economic growth of the coastal economic belt.
    Figure A9.  Innovation gap between the seven coastal cities in the Pearl River Delta and the East and West Wings.
    Figure A10.  Innovation gap between Guangzhou, Shenzhen and the other five coastal cities in the Pearl River Delta.
    Figure A11.  Innovation gap between the East Wing and the West Wing.
    Table A1.  Estimated results of absolute β convergence model of quality of economic growth (of the five dimensions of Guangdong Province).
    Variables Guangdong Province Innovative development Coordinated development Green development (LCE) Open development Shared development
    β -0.1745*** -0.1539*** -0.3196*** -0.2329*** -0.2114*** -0.2170***
    (-4.3876) (-4.5696) (-8.3474) (-7.3841) (-4.6537) (-14.7338)
    Constants -0.2663*** -0.4330*** -0.8663*** -0.9114*** -0.8870*** -0.7071***
    (-4.1426) (-3.9510) (-8.1408) (-7.1782) (-5.3113) (-13.3941)
    Individual effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Time effect Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    sigma_u 0.0889 0.1399 0.0544 0.0195 0.2260 0.1868
    sigma_e 0.0539 0.1318 0.0612 0.0622 0.3260 0.0673
    R2 0.0843 0.0908 0.2500 0.2069 0.0939 0.5095
    N 231 231 231 231 231 231
    Note: Figures in parentheses are t statistics; *, **, and *** refer to the significant level of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table A2.  Estimated results of absolute β convergence model of quality of economic growth (of the five dimensions of the Pearl River Delta).
    Variables Pearl River Delta Innovative development Coordinated development Green development (LCE) Open development Shared development
    β 0.0107 -0.0598* -0.2292*** -0.2511*** -0.0089 -0.1262***
    (0.2027) (-1.7876) (-5.3152) (-5.3896) (-0.2210) (-5.0324)
    Constants 0.0307 -0.0554 -0.6278*** -0.9744*** -0.1173 -0.2938***
    (0.5089) (-0.6505) (-5.1436) (-5.3075) (-1.0428) (-4.5587)
    Individual effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Time effect Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    sigma_u 0.0189 0.0485 0.0334 0.0131 0.0526 0.0648
    sigma_e 0.0459 0.1044 0.0383 0.0245 0.1468 0.0355
    R2 0.0005 0.0347 0.2410 0.2461 0.0005 0.2215
    N 99 99 99 99 99 99
    Note: Figures in parentheses are t statistics; *, **, and *** refer to the significant level of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table A3.  Estimated results of absolute β convergence model of quality of economic growth (of the five dimensions of the East Wing).
    Variables East Wing Innovative development Coordinated development Green development (LCE) Open development Shared development
    β -0.3177*** -0.3258*** -0.3167*** -0.2138*** -0.0484 -0.2575***
    (-3.0155) (-3.1007) (-4.4393) (-5.0191) (-0.6290) (-11.2578)
    Constants -0.5972*** -1.1375*** -0.8423*** -0.8278*** -0.3302 -1.0162***
    (-2.9565) (-2.9681) (-4.3558) (-4.8397) (-1.0599) (-10.0187)
    Individual effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Time effect Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    sigma_u 0.0328 0.0842 0.0493 0.0053 0.0228 0.0429
    sigma_e 0.0416 0.1568 0.0272 0.0329 0.2637 0.0673
    R2 0.1891 0.1978 0.3357 0.3924 0.0100 0.7647
    N 44 44 44 44 44 44
    Note: Figures in parentheses are t statistics; *, **, and *** refer to the significant level of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table A4.  Estimated results of absolute β convergence model of quality of economic growth (of the five dimensions of the West Wing).
    Variables West Wing Innovative development Coordinated development Green development (LCE) Open development Shared development
    β -0.2269** -0.3010*** -0.1706** -0.3382*** -0.7793*** -0.1987***
    (-2.2221) (-2.7719) (-2.7374) (-2.8374) (-4.1944) (-4.2849)
    Constants -0.4514** -1.1439** -0.4770** -1.3220*** -4.1057*** -0.6946***
    (-2.1130) (-2.6701) (-2.5937) (-2.8090) (-4.2913) (-3.9068)
    Individual effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Time effect Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    sigma_u 0.0192 0.0238 0.0300 0.0268 0.8482 0.0425
    sigma_e 0.0695 0.1120 0.0436 0.0430 0.6164 0.0677
    R2 0.1455 0.2094 0.2053 0.2173 0.3776 0.3877
    N 33 33 33 33 33 33
    Note: Figures in parentheses are t statistics; *, **, and *** refer to the significant level of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table A5.  Estimated results of absolute β convergence model of quality of economic growth (of the five dimensions of the mountain area).
    Variables Mountain area Innovative development Coordinated development Green development (LCE) Open development Shared development
    β -0.3773*** -0.3214*** -0.4474*** -0.2304*** -0.1048** -0.2009***
    (-4.4361) (-3.2295) (-4.5658) (-3.3772) (-2.0520) (-5.7055)
    Constants -0.7226*** -1.1767*** -1.1556*** -0.9245*** -0.5669*** -0.8200***
    (-4.3814) (-3.1150) (-4.4656) (-3.2038) (-2.7146) (-5.0883)
    Individual effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Time effect Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    sigma_u 0.0420 0.0789 0.0539 0.0207 0.0396 0.0789
    sigma_e 0.0578 0.1498 0.1042 0.1157 0.2012 0.1001
    R2 0.2865 0.1755 0.2985 0.1888 0.0791 0.3992
    N 55 55 55 55 55 55
    Note: Figures in parentheses are t statistics; *, **, and *** refer to the significant level of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table A6.  Estimated results of absolute β convergence model of quality of economic growth (of the five dimensions of the coastal economic belt).
    Variables Coastal economic belt Innovative development Coordinated development Green development (LCE) Open development Shared development
    β -0.1202** -0.1447*** -0.2278*** -0.2316*** -0.3411*** -0.2286***
    (-2.5908) (-3.8652) (-6.8822) (-7.1835) (-5.0351) (-13.9911)
    Constants -0.1647** -0.3751*** -0.6193*** -0.8991*** -1.3186*** -0.6950***
    (-2.3176) (-3.2207) (-6.6534) (-7.0374) (-5.4158) (-12.8137)
    Individual effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Time effect Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    sigma_u 0.0679 0.1406 0.0370 0.0120 0.4151 0.1869
    sigma_e 0.0507 0.1293 0.0369 0.0307 0.3579 0.0565
    R2 0.0461 0.0970 0.2541 0.2707 0.1543 0.5848
    N 154 154 154 154 154 154
    Note: Figures in parentheses are t statistics; *, **, and *** refer to the significant level of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table A7.  Estimated results of conditional β convergence model of quality of economic growth (of the five dimensions of Guangdong Province).
    Variables Guangdong Province Innovative development Coordinated development Green development (LCE) Open development Shared development
    β -0.2436*** -0.3384*** -0.4740*** -0.3302*** -0.5023*** -0.3051***
    (-5.1577) (-6.1530) (-8.7327) (-7.4553) (-7.9999) (-13.3076)
    lnPFE 0.0219*** 0.1166*** 0.0440*** 0.0349*** -0.3650*** 0.0663***
    (2.6258) (4.1540) (3.8933) (3.0686) (-6.2114) (4.8526)
    Constants -0.4975*** -1.6683*** -1.5361*** -1.4937*** 0.0471 -1.3841***
    (-4.5851) (-5.2870) (-7.6615) (-6.5815) (0.2191) (-9.3360)
    Individual effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Time effect Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    sigma_u 0.1082 0.2079 0.1015 0.0303 0.6955 0.2431
    sigma_e 0.0532 0.1270 0.0592 0.0609 0.3002 0.0639
    r2_w 0.1137 0.1605 0.3010 0.2413 0.2357 0.5594
    N 231 231 231 231 231 231
    Convergence rate 0.0254 0.0376 0.0584 0.0364 0.0634 0.0331
    Note: Figures in parentheses are t statistics; *, **, and *** refer to the significant level of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table A8.  Estimated results of conditional β convergence model of quality of economic growth (of the five dimensions of the Pearl River Delta).
    Variables Pearl River Delta Innovative development Coordinated development Green development (LCE) Open development Shared development
    β -0.0694 -0.2971*** -0.4331*** -0.5385*** -0.0652 -0.2098***
    (-1.0082) (-3.5375) (-4.8539) (-6.9107) (-1.0868) (-5.2699)
    lnPFE 0.0227* 0.1706*** 0.0436** 0.0383*** -0.0588 0.0317***
    (1.7799) (3.0559) (2.5867) (4.3971) (-1.2639) (2.6485)
    Constants -0.1975 -1.6853*** -1.4677*** -2.3381*** 0.0815 -0.6996***
    (-1.3974) (-3.1236) (-4.2471) (-6.6362) (0.4221) (-4.2287)
    Individual effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Time effect Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    sigma_u 0.0250 0.0910 0.0886 0.0146 0.0955 0.0966
    sigma_e 0.0453 0.0998 0.0371 0.0223 0.1463 0.0343
    R2 0.0352 0.1273 0.2946 0.3819 0.0184 0.2790
    N 99 99 99 99 99 99
    Convergence rate 0.0320 0.0516 0.0703 0.0214
    Note: Figures in parentheses are t statistics; *, **, and *** refer to the significant level of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table A9.  Estimated results of conditional β convergence model of quality of economic growth (of the five dimensions of the East Wing).
    Variables East Wing Innovative development Coordinated development Green development (LCE) Open development Shared development
    β -0.2963** -0.7835*** -0.3432*** -0.3366*** -0.7307*** -0.3587***
    (-2.5859) (-4.5828) (-3.4461) (-3.5979) (-5.1721) (-8.7568)
    lnPFE -0.0065 0.2317*** 0.0042 0.0301 -0.7279*** 0.0980***
    (-0.5041) (3.2111) (0.3864) (1.4694) (-5.3161) (2.8763)
    Constants -0.5247** -3.9314*** -0.9345*** -1.4676*** 0.4750 -1.9395***
    (-2.1022) (-4.2013) (-3.0298) (-3.1434) (1.6791) (-5.8026)
    Individual effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Time effect Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    sigma_u 0.0307 0.1624 0.0541 0.0071 0.3033 0.0865
    sigma_e 0.0420 0.1409 0.0276 0.0325 0.2023 0.0618
    R2 0.1945 0.3690 0.3383 0.4251 0.4323 0.8068
    N 44 44 44 44 44 44
    Convergence rate 0.0319 0.1391 0.0382 0.0373 0.1193 0.0404
    Note: Figures in parentheses are t statistics; *, **, and *** refer to the significant level of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table A10.  Estimated results of conditional β convergence model of quality of economic growth (of the five dimensions of the West Wing).
    Variables West Wing Innovative development Coordinated development Green development (LCE) Open development Shared development
    β -0.5144** -0.8149*** -0.4438*** -0.3857** -0.8672*** -0.1544
    (-2.5889) (-4.8703) (-2.8907) (-2.6611) (-4.4591) (-1.4413)
    lnPFE 0.0758 0.2121*** 0.0697* 0.0104 -0.2923 -0.0242
    (1.6693) (3.6584) (1.9309) (0.5898) (-1.3485) (-0.4604)
    Constants -1.4451** -4.2697*** -1.6446** -1.5629** -3.0394** -0.3996
    (-2.2926) (-4.6078) (-2.6117) (-2.4918) (-2.4689) (-0.6006)
    Individual effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Time effect Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    sigma_u 0.0916 0.1416 0.0856 0.0275 0.8703 0.0244
    sigma_e 0.0674 0.0937 0.0417 0.0435 0.6079 0.0686
    R2 0.2228 0.4651 0.2987 0.2269 0.4155 0.3923
    N 33 33 33 33 33 33
    Convergence rate 0.0657 0.1533 0.0533 0.0443 0.1836
    Note: Figures in parentheses are t statistics; *, **, and *** refer to the significant level of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table A11.  Estimated results of conditional β convergence model of quality of economic growth (of the five dimensions of the mountain area).
    Variables Mountain area Innovative development Coordinated development Green development (LCE) Open development Shared development
    β -0.4231*** -0.4736*** -0.5659*** -0.5474*** -0.4689*** -0.3767***
    (-4.8011) (-3.8243) (-4.7944) (-4.4519) (-4.2717) (-5.8174)
    lnPFE 0.0251 0.0935* 0.0553* 0.1599*** -0.4019*** 0.1472***
    (1.6445) (1.9680) (1.7277) (3.0061) (-3.6474) (3.1364)
    Constants -0.9393*** -2.2291*** -1.7493*** -3.0765*** 0.0021 -2.3706***
    (-4.4961) (-3.4365) (-4.0955) (-4.0257) (0.0087) (-4.5926)
    Individual effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Time effect Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    sigma_u 0.0518 0.1309 0.0769 0.0848 0.2140 0.2036
    sigma_e 0.0568 0.1456 0.1022 0.1073 0.1799 0.0921
    R2 0.3246 0.2371 0.3395 0.3173 0.2790 0.5014
    N 55 55 55 55 55 55
    Convergence rate 0.0500 0.0583 0.0759 0.0721 0.0575 0.0430
    Note: Figures in parentheses are t statistics; *, **, and *** refer to the significant level of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table A12.  Estimated results of conditional β convergence model of quality of economic growth (of the five dimensions of the coastal economic belt).
    Variables Coastal economic belt Innovative development Coordinated development Green development (LCE) Open development Shared development
    β -0.2008*** -0.3802*** -0.3123*** -0.3250*** -0.6877*** -0.3056***
    (-3.1038) (-5.4462) (-5.3474) (-6.6772) (-8.0891) (-12.6408)
    lnPFE 0.0199* 0.1502*** 0.0181* 0.0186** -0.4166*** 0.0550***
    (1.7736) (3.9232) (1.7501) (2.5246) (-5.8409) (4.1457)
    Constants -0.3989*** -1.9408*** -0.9575*** -1.3724*** -0.2366 -1.2561***
    (-2.6647) (-4.6856) (-4.4699) (-6.0854) (-0.8251) (-8.6773)
    Individual effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Time effect Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    sigma_u 0.0959 0.2283 0.0596 0.0128 1.0412 0.2264
    sigma_e 0.0503 0.1231 0.0366 0.0301 0.3217 0.0534
    r2_w 0.0673 0.1877 0.2703 0.3029 0.3219 0.6308
    N 154 154 154 154 154 154
    Convergence rate 0.0204 0.0435 0.0340 0.0357 0.1058 0.0332
    Note: Figures in parentheses are t statistics; *, **, and *** refer to the significant level of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV


    Conflict of interest



    I am an editorial board and I was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article. All authors declare that there are no competing interests.

    Author contributions



    Conceptualization, J.L.C.-G. and F.M.-M.; data curation, M.B.C-P, N.G-C; formal analysis, F.d.C.-V. and M.A.G-V.; funding acquisition, J.L.C.-G., F.M.-M., and M.F.-D.; investigation, J.L.C.-G, N.G-C.; software, F.d.C.-V. and M.A.G.-V.; methodology, F.M.-M., F.d.C.-V., M.B.C-P; project administration, J.L.C.-G.; resources, F.M.-M.; supervision, J.L.C.-G. and F.M.-M.; validation, M.F.-D and M.B.C.-P.; visualization, J.L.C.-G., N.G-C and F.M.-M; writing—original draft preparation, J.L.C.-G. and F.M.-M.; writing—review and editing, J.L.C.-G., F.d.C.-V., M.B.C.-P., F.d.C.-V, M.F.-D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

    [1] Wang RE, Lang NP (2012) Ridge preservation after tooth extraction. Clin Oral Implants Res 23: 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02560.x
    [2] Araújo MG, Sukekava F, Wennström JL, et al. (2005) Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 32: 645-652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00726.x
    [3] Araújo MG, Lindhe J (2005) Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 32: 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x
    [4] Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J (2004) Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol 31: 820-828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00565.x
    [5] Welander M, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T (2009) Placement of two-part implants in sites with different buccal and lingual bone heights. J Periodontol 80: 324-329. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080375
    [6] Negri B, Calvo-Guirado JL, Pardo-Zamora G, et al. (2012) Retracted: Peri-implant bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. Part I: a pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 23: 228-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02158.x
    [7] Negri B, Calvo-Guirado JL, Ramírez-Fernández MP, et al. (2012) Retracted: Peri-implant bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. Part II: a pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 23: 236-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02290.x
    [8] Calvo-Guirado JL, Aguilar-Salvatierra A, Gomez-Moreno G, et al. (2014) Histological, radiological and histomorphometric evaluation of immediate vs. non-immediate loading of a zirconia implant with surface treatment in a dog model. Clin Oral Implants Res 25: 826-830. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12145
    [9] Degidi M, Piattelli A, Scarano A, et al. (2012) Peri-implant collagen fibers around human cone Morse connection implants under polarized light: a report of three cases. Int J Periodont Res Dent 32: 323-328.
    [10] Fickl S, Zuhr O, Stein JM, et al. (2010) Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments. Int J Oral Max Impl 25: 577-581.
    [11] Valles C, Rodríguez-Ciurana X, Nart J, et al. (2017) Influence of implant neck surface and placement depth on crestal bone changes around platform-switched implants: A clinical and radiographic study in dogs. J Periodontol 88: 1200-1210. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2017.170192
    [12] Calvo-Guirado JL, Gómez-Moreno G, López-Marí L, et al. (2011) Crestal bone loss evaluation in osseotite expanded platform implants: a 5-year study. Clin Oral Implants Res 22: 1409-1414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02130.x
    [13] Calvo-Guirado JL, Ortiz-Ruiz AJ, Negri B, et al. (2010) Histological and histomorphometric evaluation of immediate implant placement on a dog model with a new implant surface treatment. Clin Oral Implants Res 21: 308-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01841.x
    [14] Calvo-Guirado JL, Cambra J, Tarnow DP (2009) The effect of interimplant distance on the height of the interimplant bone crest when using platform-switched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 29: 141-151.
    [15] Delgado-Ruiz RA, Calvo-Guirado JL, Abboud M, et al. (2015) Connective tissue characteristics around healing abutments of different geometries: new methodological technique under circularly polarized light. Clin Implant Dent R 17: 667-680. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12161
    [16] Delgado-Ruiz RA, Calvo-Guirado JL, Abboud M, et al. (2015) Connective tissue characteristics around healing abutments of different geometries: new methodological technique under circularly polarized light. Clin Implant Dent R 17: 667-680. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12161
    [17] Negri B, Calvo Guirado JL, Maté Sánchez de Val JE, et al. (2014) Peri-implant tissue reactions to immediate nonocclusal loaded implants with different collar design: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 25: e54-e63. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12047
    [18] Froum SJ, Cho SC, Suzuki T, et al. (2018) Epicrestal and subcrestal placement of platform-switched implants: 18 month-result of a randomized, controlled, split-mouth, prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 29: 353-366. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13129
    [19] Mangano F, Mangano C, Ricci M, et al. (2012) Single-tooth Morse taper connection implants placed in fresh extraction sockets of the anterior maxilla: an aesthetic evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 23: 1302-1307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02307.x
    [20] Donovan R, Fetner A, Koutouzis T, et al. (2010) Crestal bone changes around implants with reduced abutment diameter placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions: A 1-year radiographic evaluation. J Periodontol 81: 428-434. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.090317
    [21] Rodríguez X, Vela X, Calvo-Guirado JL, et al. (2012) Effect of platform switching on collagen fiber orientation and bone resorption around dental implants: a preliminary histologic animal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27: 1116-1122.
    [22] Oskarsson M, Otsuki M, Welander M, et al. (2018) Peri-implant tissue healing at implants with different designs and placement protocols: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 29: 873-880. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13339
    [23] Francisco H, Finelle G, Bornert F, et al. (2021) Peri-implant bone preservation of a novel, self-cutting, and fully tapered implant in the healed crestal ridge of minipigs: submerged vs. transgingival healing. Clin Oral Invest 25: 6821-6832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03970-0
    [24] Nagarajan B, Murthy V, Livingstone D, et al. (2015) Evaluation of crestal bone loss around implants placed at equicrestal and subcrestal levels before loading: a prospective clinical study. J Clin Diagn Res 9: ZC47-ZC50. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/13911.7000
    [25] Calvo-Guirado JL, Boquete-Castro A, Negri B, et al. (2014) Crestal bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. A pilot study in Foxhound dogs. Clin Oral Impl Res 25: 344-351. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12110
    [26] Sotto-Maior BS, Lima CA, Senna PM, et al. (2014) Biomechanical evaluation of subcrestal dental implants with different bone anchorages. Braz Oral Res 28: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2014.vol28.0023
    [27] Cochran DL, Mau LP, Higginbottom FL, et al. (2013) Soft and hard tissue histologic dimensions around dental implants in the canine restored with smaller-diameter abutments: a paradigm shift in peri-implant biology. Int J Oral Max Impl 28: 494-502. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3081
    [28] de Val JEMS, Gómez-Moreno G, Ruiz-Linares M, et al. (2017) Effects of surface treatment modification and implant design in implants placed crestal and subcrestally applying delayed loading protocol. J Craniofac Surg 28: 552-558. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003209
    [29] Calvo-Guirado JL, López-López PJ, Mate Sanchez JE, et al. (2014) Crestal bone loss related to immediate implants in crestal and subcrestal position: a pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 25: 1286-1294. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12267
    [30] Calvo-Guirado JL, Delgado Ruiz RA, Ramírez-Fernández MP, et al. (2016) Retracted: Histological and histomorphometric analyses of narrow implants, crestal and subcrestally placed in severe alveolar atrophy: a study in foxhound dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 27: 497-504. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12569
    [31] Sánchez-Siles M, Muñoz-Cámara D, Salazar-Sánchez N, et al. (2018) Crestal bone loss around submerged and non-submerged implants during the osseointegration phase with different healing abutment designs: a randomized prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 29: 808-812. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12981
    [32] De Siqueira RAC, Savaget Goncalves Junior R, Dos Santos PGF, et al. (2020) Effect of different implant placement depths on crestal bone levels and soft tissue behavior: a 5-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 31: 282-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13569
    [33] de Siqueira RAC, Fontão FNGK, Sartori IAM, et al. (2017) Effect of different implant placement depths on crestal bone levels and soft tissue behavior: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 28: 1227-1233. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12946
    [34] Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Linkevicius R, et al. (2020) The influence of submerged healing abutment or subcrestal implant placement on soft tissue thickness and crestal bone stability. A 2-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent R 22: 497-506. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12903
    [35] Linkevicius T, Linkevicius R, Gineviciute E, et al. (2021) The influence of new immediate tissue level abutment on crestal bone stability of subcrestally placed implants: A 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent R 23: 259-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12979
    [36] Madani E, Smeets R, Freiwald E, et al. (2018) Impact of different placement depths on the crestal bone level of immediate versus delayed placed platform-switched implants. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 46: 1139-1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2018.05.001
    [37] Uraz A, Isler S C, Cula S, et al. (2019) Platform-switched implants vs platform-matched implants placed in different implant-abutment interface positions: A prospective randomized clinical and microbiological study. Clin Implant Dent R 22: 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12873
    [38] Fernández-Domínguez M, Ortega-Asensio V, Fuentes Numancia E, et al. (2019) Can the macrogeometry of dental implants influence guided bone regeneration in buccal bone defects? Histomorphometric and biomechanical analysis in beagle dogs. J Clin Med 8: 618. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8050618
    [39] Pellicer-Chover H, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, et al. (2016) Impact of crestal and subcrestal implant placement in peri-implant bone: a prospective comparative study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 21: e103-e110. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.20747
    [40] Cruz RS, Lemos CAA, de Luna Gomes JM, et al. (2022) Clinical comparison between crestal and subcrestal dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 127: 408-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.003
    [41] Palacios-Garzón N, Velasco-Ortega E, López-López J (2019) Bone loss in implants placed at subcrestal and crestal level: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials 12: 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12010154
    [42] Valles C, Rodríguez-Ciurana X, Clementini M, et al. (2018) Influence of subcrestal implant placement compared with equicrestal position on the peri-implant hard and soft tissues around platform-switched implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Invest 22: 555-570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2301-1
    [43] Tenenbaum H, Schaaf JF, Cuisinier FJ (2003) Histological analysis of the Ankylos peri-implant soft tissues in a dog model. Implant Dent 12: 259-265. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ID.0000075720.78252.54
    [44] Al Amri MD (2016) Crestal bone loss around submerged and nonsubmerged dental implants: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 115: 564-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.002
    [45] Al Amri MD, Alfadda SA, Labban NY, et al. (2018) Comparison of clinical, radiographic, and immunologic inflammatory parameters around crestally and subcrestally placed dental implants: 5-year retrospective results. J Prosthodont 27: 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12637
    [46] Koutouzis T, Adeinat B, Ali A (2019) The influence of abutment macro-design on clinical and radiographic peri-implant tissue changes for guided, placed, and restored implants: a 1-year randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 30: 882-891. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13493
    [47] Fetner M, Fetner A, Koutouzis T, et al. (2015) The effects of subcrestal implant placement on crestal bone levels and bone-to-abutment contact: A microcomputed tomographic and histologic study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 30: 1068-1075. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4043
    [48] Thoma DS, Jung UW, Gil A, et al. (2019) The effects of hard and soft tissue grafting and individualization of healing abutments at immediate implants: an experimental study in dogs. J Periodontal Implant Sci 49: 171-184. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2019.49.3.171
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1593) PDF downloads(78) Cited by(0)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog