Editorial Special Issues

Innovation in agriculture and the agri-food chain: Some insights

  • Citation: Valentina Maria Merlino, Simone Blanc, Stefano Massaglia. Innovation in agriculture and the agri-food chain: Some insights[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(2): 550-552. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023029

    Related Papers:

    [1] Monsuru Adekunle Salisu, Che Rus Ridzwan, Yusuf Opeyemi Oyebamiji, Norhanizan Usaizan, Abiodun Emmanuel Abioye, Idris Fadheelah Biola, Nurudeen Babatunde Bamiro, Ahmed Kayode Omowunmi, Hussain Luqman . Disruption of the Covid-19 pandemic on the agri-food sector: A systematic review of its implications in post-pandemic and future of food security. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(1): 148-168. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024009
    [2] Wei Yang, Bryan Anh, Phuc Le . Do consumers care about environmentally sustainable attributes along the food supply chain? —A systematic literature review. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(2): 513-533. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023027
    [3] Yonas T. Bahta . Competitiveness of South Africa's agri-food commodities. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(4): 945-968. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021057
    [4] Giuseppe Timpanaro, Paolo Guarnaccia, Silvia Zingale, Vera Teresa Foti, Alessandro Scuderi . The sustainability role in the purchasing choice of agri-food products in the United Arab Emirates and Italy. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(2): 212-240. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022014
    [5] Emilio J. González-Sánchez, Amir Kassam, Gottlieb Basch, Bernhard Streit, Antonio Holgado-Cabrera, Paula Triviño-Tarradas . Conservation Agriculture and its contribution to the achievement of agri-environmental and economic challenges in Europe. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2016, 1(4): 387-408. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2016.4.387
    [6] Giulia Chiaraluce, Deborah Bentivoglio, Adele Finco . The circular economy model in the agri-food sector: A new strategy for the regional development. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(3): 851-872. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023045
    [7] Jahanara Akter, Sadia Islam Nilima, Rakibul Hasan, Anamika Tiwari, Md Wali Ullah, Md Kamruzzaman . Artificial intelligence on the agro-industry in the United States of America. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(4): 959-979. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024052
    [8] Monsuru Adekunle Salisu, Yusuf Opeyemi Oyebamiji, Omowunmi Kayode Ahmed, Noraziyah A Shamsudin, Yusoff Siti Fairuz, Oladosu Yusuff, Mohd Rafii Yusop, Zulkefly Sulaiman, Fatai Arolu . A systematic review of emerging trends in crop cultivation using soilless techniques for sustainable agriculture and food security in post-pandemic. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(2): 666-692. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024036
    [9] Edwin Collado, Anibal Fossatti, Yessica Saez . Smart farming: A potential solution towards a modern and sustainable agriculture in Panama. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(2): 266-284. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.2.266
    [10] Isaac Busayo Oluwatayo . Towards assuring food security in South Africa: Smallholder farmers as drivers. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(2): 485-500. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.2.485


  • Research and innovation in sustainable food systems is a focus of public policy, such as that of the European Union. It has become evident that business-as-usual market patterns are not compatible with the growing demands of environmental and social sustainability.

    Population growth, urbanization, migration, resource scarcity, climate change, and environmental degradation [1] are creating increasingly urgent and complex challenges.

    Therefore, agri-food systems, research, and innovation need to combine a new production and consumption paradigm, resulting in new sustainable, resilient, inclusive, and healthy market opportunities to achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals and to realize the policy objectives of the EU Farm-to-Fork strategy and Green Deal.

    This Editorial aims to report a critical reading of some examples of innovation in the agri-food sector, with the objective of concluding the discussion opened by the ten research articles published in the AIMS Agriculture and Food in the Special Issue: Innovation in agriculture and the agri-food chain.

    Several studies demonstrated the importance of product innovation to increase visibility, accessibility, consumers' loyalty and purchasing intention. Stakeholders in the agri-food chain can act at various levels to implement innovative solutions in the production process or during product development/renewal. Process/product improvement strategies must include market analysis considering, among other things, the study of the consumer in order to successfully define product positioning in the minds of potential buyers of the innovative product. Product innovation strategies include those that renew the image of the product itself, which can be transformed from "conventional" to "certified", "sustainable", and "safe".

    At the supply chain level, a sustainable production system, perhaps certified, represents a product enhancement factor to which consumers show increasing attention when choosing food products. However, the inclusion of this choice attribute is product/specific: as shown in Merlino et. al [2], for example, product characteristics attributable to the environmental sustainability dimension carry less weight during the assessment of product quality than convenience and safety attributes in ready-to-eat products, such as fresh-cut salads. On the contrary, product sustainability, encompassed in its social, economic and environmental dimensions, ascribable to traditional and/or extensive food production systems, becomes a discriminating factor in the choice of 'mountain' or 'local' products, as e.g. Brun et al. [3] demonstrated in the case of honey. At the same time, the assessment of the sustainability of the supply chain, supported by technological innovation and the circular economy, is considered an important factor evaluated by the various countries of the European Union both in traditional supply chains and, above all, in novel food supply chains, in order to assess their feasibility and durability in the long term [4].

    From another perspective, the transition to an innovative supply chain can be interpreted as the inclusion of advanced practices and management changes made in order to increase food security and health [5,6]. In fact, as described by [7,8] in traditional traceability management systems often involve considerable bureaucratic, economic and managerial effort on the part of companies, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, which make up most of the food sector. The same authors, moreover, starting from a thorough literature review, developed a low-cost open-source traceability system focused on food safety and quality. In order to encourage the adoption of inexpensive and management-sustainable traceability systems with ultimate benefits for producers, retailers and consumers [7,8].

    In the latter projection, the increasing of traceability efficiency systems [6], also using technological approach as the blockchain system [9] can favor the management of traceability systems also for small and medium-sized enterprises and increase the transparency of the supply chain in the eyes of consumers. In particular, Osei et al. [9] identified the novelty of the technology, supply chain characteristics, open data issues, cost-benefit analysis, and role of public stakeholders has the main factors affection the Blockchain technology adoption, in particular in fresh-food supply chain.

    Product innovation, on the other hand, besides involving intrinsic product characteristics, often includes a decision-making process about the packaging image. Packaging is the factor most involved in communication strategies as it is the part of the product that most directly interacts with the consumer during the choice process. However, some sectors are characterized by anonymous, standardized packaging that can hardly compete with nascent competitors: cow's milk vs. vegetable drinks, for example. Despite the fact that the cow's milk sector has been going through a critical moment for years, both in terms of consumption and production, packaging could nevertheless represent an appealing and differentiating tool for consumers. In fact, the study by Merlino et al. [10] showed how consumers are willing to buy and spend a premium price for innovative, more environmentally sustainable packaging, but also characterized by a more convenient and practical opening system. An innovative packaging, in the case of craft beer [11], was evaluated as a tool for product novelty by assessing the acceptability of the use of the can by a sample of consumers. In conclusion, this research shows how a target of consumers accepts the use of the can for craft beers. This work showed how the can represents a key positive element for innovation as, not only could it be accepted by consumers, but it can accommodate attractive graphics, also providing logistical advantages over the traditional glass.

    These studies thus demonstrated the impact of process and product innovation on production efficiency, safety, healthiness and product quality. Innovation, undertaken in its various perspectives, can therefore represent a tool for growth and improvement of company efficiency, thus becoming a tool for enhancing and differentiating products on the market.

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (European Commission), IPSOS, SPI, et al. (2023) Food systems: Research and innovation investment gap study: policy report, LU, Publications Office of the European Union. Available from: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/knowledge-publications-tools-and-data/publications/all-publications/food-systems-research-and-innovation-investment-gap-study_en
    [2] Merlino VM, Borra D, Bargetto A, et al. (2020) Innovation towards sustainable fresh-cut salad production: Are Italian consumers receptive? AIMS Agric Food 5: 365–386. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2020.3.365 doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.3.365
    [3] Brun F, Zanchini R, Mosso A, et al. (2020) Testing consumer propensity towards novel optional quality terms: An explorative assessment of "mountain" labelled honey. AIMS Agric Food 5: 190–203. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2020.2.190 doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.2.190
    [4] Zarbà C, La Via G, Pappalardo G, et al. (2020) The sustainability of Novel foods in the transition phase to the circular economy; the trade "Algae fit for human consumption" in European Union. AIMS Agric Food 5: 54–75. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2020.1.54 doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.1.54
    [5] Rosenberg M (2021) Thoughts about food security, food loss and waste and what has to be done. AIMS Agric Food 6: 797–798. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2021048 doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021048
    [6] Bentivoglio D, Rotordam M, Staffolani G, et al. (2021) Understanding consumption choices of innovative products: an outlook on the Italian functional food market. AIMS Agric Food 6: 818–837. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2021050 doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021050
    [7] Curto JP, Gaspar PD, Curto JP, et al. (2021) Traceability in food supply chains: Review and SME focused analysis—Part 1. AIMS Agric Food 6: 679–707. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2021041 doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021041
    [8] Curto JP, Gaspar PD, Curto JP, et al. (2021) Traceability in food supply chains: SME focused traceability framework for chain-wide quality and safety—Part 2. AIMS Agric Food 6: 708–736. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2021042 doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021042
    [9] Osei RK, Medici M, Hingley M, et al. (2021) Exploring opportunities and challenges to the adoption of blockchain technology in the fresh produce value chain. AIMS Agric Food 6: 560–577. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2021033 doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021033
    [10] Merlino VM, Brun F, Versino A, et al. (2020) Milk packaging innovation: Consumer perception and willingness to pay. AIMS Agric Food 5: 307–326. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2020.2.307 doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.2.307
    [11] Merlino VM, Blanc S, Massaglia S, et al. (2020) Innovation in craft beer packaging: Evaluation of consumer perception and acceptance. AIMS Agric Food 5: 422–433. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2020.3.422 doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.3.422
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1688) PDF downloads(184) Cited by(0)

Article outline

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog