Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Research article Topical Sections

Rhizoctonia solani AG-3PT is the major pathogen associated with potato stem canker and black scurf in Jordan

  • Rhizoctonia solani (teleomorph: Thanatephorus cucumeris) is a global soil-borne pathogen that severely harms potato crops, leading to significant product losses. Black scurf and stem canker are two manifestations caused by this pathogen, with variable intensity based on the distinctive anastomosis group endemic to the region. During the growing season of 2017 (March and April), 57 different fungus isolates were collected from potato crops farmed in the Jordan Valley. The identity of all the isolates was confirmed by sequencing the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of the ribosomal DNA gene, and the hyphal interactions were also performed with R. solani isolates. The sequences were deposited in GenBank, where accession numbers were obtained. 21 of the isolates were AG-3PT R. solani, with 98–99% identity to reference strains. Somatic compatibility was determined by hyphal interactions, which showed pairing compatibility among the isolates. Around 86.7% of the pairings were somatically incompatible, indicating a high level of genetic diversity among the isolates, while only 13.3% of the pairings were somatically compatible. Testing for pathogenicity revealed that AG-3PT affected the stems of solanaceous plants, including potatoes, and the roots of other plant species. Based on the findings of this study, R. solani AG-3PT was the primary pathogen associated with potato stem canker and black scurf diseases in Jordan. To our knowledge, this is the first report on this pathogen's isolation and identification in Jordan.

    Citation: Ziad Jaradat, Hussen Aldakil, Maher Tadros, Mohammad Alboom, Batool Khataybeh. Rhizoctonia solani AG-3PT is the major pathogen associated with potato stem canker and black scurf in Jordan[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(1): 119-136. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023006

    Related Papers:

    [1] Clarissa Trindade, Carla S.S. Gouveia, Maria Cristina O. Oliveira, Humberto Nóbrega, José G.R. de Freitas, Miguel A.A. Pinheiro de Carvalho . Inhibitory activity of the peel and seed of Annona cherimola Mill. against Fusarium and Aspergillus pathogens. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2025, 10(1): 155-176. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2025009
    [2] María Cámara-Ruiz, José María García Beltrán, Francisco Antonio Guardiola, María Ángeles Esteban . In vitro and in vivo effects of purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) on gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.). AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 799-824. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.799
    [3] Budi Suarti, Sukarno, Ardiansyah, Slamet Budijanto . Bio-active compounds, their antioxidant activities, and the physicochemical and pasting properties of both pigmented and non-pigmented fermented de-husked rice flour. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 49-64. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021004
    [4] Nelson Mpumi, Revocatus L. Machunda, Kelvin M. Mtei, Patrick A. Ndakidemi . Insecticidal Efficacy of Syzygium aromaticum, Tephrosia vogelii and Croton dichogamus Extracts against Plutella xylostella and Trichoplusia ni on Brassica oleracea crop in Northern Tanzania. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 185-202. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021012
    [5] Johan Sukweenadhi, Eloqui Viectorica Wiranata, Ida Bagus Made Artadana, Kang-Se Chang . Isolation and in vitro screening of plant growth promoting bacteria from rhizosphere and root tissues of potato tuber (Solanum tuberosum L.). AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(4): 1028-1037. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023055
    [6] Tarik Ainane, Fatouma Mohamed Abdoul-Latif, Asmae Baghouz, Zineb El Montassir, Wissal Attahar, Ayoub Ainane, Angelo Maria Giuffrè . Correction: Essential oils rich in pulegone for insecticide purpose against legume bruchus species: Case of Ziziphora hispanica L. and Mentha pulegium L.. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(1): 236-238. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023013
    [7] Nicolas Nagahama, Bruno Gastaldi, Michael N. Clifford, María M. Manifesto, Renée H. Fortunato . The influence of environmental variations on the phenolic compound profiles and antioxidant activity of two medicinal Patagonian valerians (Valeriana carnosa Sm. and V. clarionifolia Phil.). AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 106-124. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021007
    [8] Talita Loureiro, Berta Gonçalves, Luís Serra, Ângela Martins, Isabel Cortez, Patrícia Poeta . Histological analysis of Xylella fastidiosa infection in Quercus pyrenaica in Northern Portugal. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(2): 607-627. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024033
    [9] The Han Nguyen, Patrick Achiever Blamo Jr, Xiaoyong Liu, Thi Van Anh Tran, Sang Moo Kim . β-Glucuronidase inhibitory activity of bromophenol isolated from red alga Grateloupia lancifolia. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(2): 551-559. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021032
    [10] Justyna Nasiłowska, Barbara Sokołowska, Monika Fonberg-Broczek . Escherichia coli and Listeria innocua stability in carrot juice preserved by high hydrostatic pressure. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(3): 623-636. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022039
  • Rhizoctonia solani (teleomorph: Thanatephorus cucumeris) is a global soil-borne pathogen that severely harms potato crops, leading to significant product losses. Black scurf and stem canker are two manifestations caused by this pathogen, with variable intensity based on the distinctive anastomosis group endemic to the region. During the growing season of 2017 (March and April), 57 different fungus isolates were collected from potato crops farmed in the Jordan Valley. The identity of all the isolates was confirmed by sequencing the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of the ribosomal DNA gene, and the hyphal interactions were also performed with R. solani isolates. The sequences were deposited in GenBank, where accession numbers were obtained. 21 of the isolates were AG-3PT R. solani, with 98–99% identity to reference strains. Somatic compatibility was determined by hyphal interactions, which showed pairing compatibility among the isolates. Around 86.7% of the pairings were somatically incompatible, indicating a high level of genetic diversity among the isolates, while only 13.3% of the pairings were somatically compatible. Testing for pathogenicity revealed that AG-3PT affected the stems of solanaceous plants, including potatoes, and the roots of other plant species. Based on the findings of this study, R. solani AG-3PT was the primary pathogen associated with potato stem canker and black scurf diseases in Jordan. To our knowledge, this is the first report on this pathogen's isolation and identification in Jordan.



    Rhizoctonia solani is a soil-borne fungus that belongs to the phylum Basidiomycota [1,2]. This fungus severely impairs the quality and quantity of potato production, resulting in significant economic losses [3,4]. However, a variety of mild symptoms, such as misshaped tubers, growth cracks, netted scab, dry core, and tuber greening, which manifest more frequently than any other symptoms, contribute to yield losses [5,6]. Observed moderate symptoms include sunken lesions on stems (cankers), necrotic lesions on stolons and roots, as well as tuber sclerotia (irregularly shaped masses of fungal mycelium also known as black scurf), which cause seedling mortality and reduced tuber output. In severe infections, the fungus can girdle and kill the stems, damaging the entire plant [1,7]. Other fungi, such as Fusarium spp. and Alternaria spp. also cause problems in potato crops and inflict various damages but to a lesser extent than Rhizoctonia spp. which is the more prominent potato pathogen [8,9]. Tuber quality is often reduced by the development of sclerotia on progeny tubers, and thus, the product's marketability is adversely affected, particularly for pre-packaged potatoes [5]. In some cases, marketable yield losses approaching 30% have been reported [10]. The potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is one of the most important non-grain food crops in the world [11]. In Jordan, potatoes are widely grown in a wide variety of environments. The potato crop, as with many other agricultural and horticultural crops, is subjected to attacks by species of Rhizoctonia, a globally ubiquitous fungus genus [1,3]. Due to its moderate climate, the Jordan Valley is a major producer of potatoes in the autumn and winter. In contrast, the rain-fed regions (the Highlands) are mainly cultivated in the spring. To cultivate their crops, farmers use a variety of imported potato tubers most of them came from the Netherlands, France, and Germany without assurances that these tubers are free of R. solani. According to Abu El Samen and Al Bodor [12], R. solani was present in 42.5% of the tested 109 samples of imported potato tubers from Europe.

    Rhizoctonia solani is a complex species composed of 13 anastomosis groups (AG1-AG13, with AG B1 being a subset of AG-2 B1) [13]. Traditionally, the AG grouping is assigned phenotypically based on hyphal interactions, where hyphae of isolates belonging to the same AG are able to anastomose [1]. However, such a traditional method does not offer reliable results, particularly for designating group subsets [3]. Other parameters, including pathogenicity, biochemical traits, and modern genetic markers, have been used to more reliably and definitively assign the AG groupings [14]. Molecular approaches for accurately identifying Rhizoctonia subgroups have been increasingly used to assign each isolate to its AG group. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based techniques for amplifying the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) are frequently used in conjunction with phylogenetic analysis to understand the genetic relationship among isolates [3,15]. This method is thought to be superior in terms of assigning anastomosis AG grouping to hyphal interactions. There is relatively little data given about the biology of the disease and the relative importance of the various AGs in the etiology of Rhizoctonia diseases in potatoes in Jordan as well as other countries. Knowing this information is crucial for assessing the use of particular fungicides that may work effectively against specific AGs. Furthermore, collecting such information will help predict the disease's severity once it appears and the correct approach to diagnose and treat it [14]. According to studies, different AGs have different hosts. Hence, they are designated by an abbreviation. For example, the AGs for potato (AG3-TP), tobacco (AG3-TB), and tomato are (AG3-TM). Each is consequently associated with various disease symptoms.

    There are no projections of the impact of Rhizoctonia diseases on tuber quality and yield in Jordan, and farmers are frequently unaware of the underlying causes of their potato crop damage. The objective of this study therefore, was to isolate and identify all causative agents affecting the potato crops in the Jordan Valley using molecular techniques and to study the pathogenicity of specific R. solani AGs to potato and other vegetable plants.

    One hundred fifty potato plants and tubers with typical R. solani symptoms (black scurf and canker on stems, stolons, and roots) were obtained during March and April of 2017 from 15 transects within fields from three geographically different locations in the Jordan Valley. These locations represent the most important potato-growing areas in the Jordan Valley (Table 1).

    Table 1.  The location and climatic conditions of the infected potato populations analyzed in this study.
    Jordan Valley Areas Municipality Field Location and climatic conditions Potato species or cultivar
    Average temperature (℃) Average rainfall (mm) Average air humidity (%) Altitude
    (M.o.s.l.)
    Min Max
    North Krima, Shikh Hussien, Abo Habil, Abo Sido, North Shuna, Alezba 70 15.0 31.2 342.0 40.7–73.8 −100 to −200 Nicola, Kenebec, Diamant, Spunta, Draga.
    Middle Khazma, Tharar, Maadi, Alramel 50 15.8 29.0 281.0 32.2–65.3 −200 to −300 Nicola, Kenebec, Diamant, Spunta, Draga.
    South Alsafi, Almamora, Alslemani, Khanzira 30 18.2 30.8 72.6 27.5–64.0 −300 to −425 Nicola, Kenebec, Diamant, Spunta, Draga.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The collected samples were brought to the plant pathology laboratory in the faculty of agriculture at the Jordan University of Science and Technology to isolate the pathogen and examine its phenotypic and pathogenic traits. Infected plant materials with obvious disease symptoms were rinsed in running water and dried for four hours in a laminar flow cabinet in order to separate Rhizoctonia and other pathogens. Small pieces of infected tissue, 4 mm in diameter and 5 mm deep, were excised using a sterile scalpel blade and plated onto petri plates containing 1.5% water agar (WA) supplemented with streptomycin sulfate (Sigma-Aldrich) at 50 mg/liter. The plates were incubated at 25 ℃ for 48 hours. The colonies of each isolate that was determined to be a Rhizoctonia spp. were examined under a microscope, and fungal hyphal tips were collected. Following the procedures outlined by Carling and Leiner [16], tissue samples were placed onto potato dextrose agar (PDA; Biolab, Hungary), and were incubated for three days at 22 ℃.

    DNA was extracted from 57 pure fungal samples that were phenotypically identified as Rhizoctonia spp. according to the method described by Liu et al. [17]. The quantity and quality of DNA samples were detected using NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher scientific cat ID: ND-2000) and gel electrophoresis, respectively. Working DNA solutions of 20 ng/µL were prepared, and both the stock and working solution were stored at −20 ℃.

    The ITS region for each isolate was amplified using the universal primers; ITS1-F (5'-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3') [18] and ITS-4 (5'-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3') [19] that anneal to the flanking 18S and 28S rDNA genes. PCR reactions were conducted under the following conditions; 95 ℃ initial denaturation for 5 minutes, 35 cycles of 1 min 95 ℃ denaturation, 30 sec 45 ℃ annealing, 1 min 72 ℃ extension, 72 ℃ final extension, and holding at 4 ℃. Each primer (1 µL) was added to the reaction from a 10 µM working solution alongside with 2xPCR master mix solution (Ⅰ-MAX Ⅱ) (cat ID 25266), 20 ng template DNA, and an appropriate amount of nuclease free water to reach 20 µL final volume. A negative control sample was used containing all the components except the DNA template was used to check for any contamination.

    PCR amplifications were analyzed using agarose gel electrophoresis stained with ethidium bromide. Prior to sequencing, PCR products were cut from the agarose gels and purified using Zymoclean Gel DNA Recovery Kits (cat IDD4007).

    Sequencing reactions were carried out using BigDye™ Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (cat ID 4337455) and analyzed using the genetic analyzer 3100 DNA sequencer located in the Princess Haya Biotechnology Center, Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST).

    NCBI BLASTn database was used to check the identity of each sequence and to find the closest match based on maximal percentage identity. Confirmed sequences were deposited in GenBank and were assigned accession numbers.

    Two phylogenetic trees were constructed, the first of which (Figure 1) displayed the phylogenetic relatedness between all 57 isolates, while the second of which (Figure 2) displayed only the 21 Rhizoctonia isolates (Figure 2). Both trees were constructed with 5 Rhizoctonia sequences representing out groups: an out group belonging to a different AG group (AB054845.1, (AG-2-1), an AG3 group infecting tobacco (AB000004.1 AG-3-TB), an AG3 group infecting tomato (AB000023.1(AG-3-TM), and two isolates of an AG3 group infecting potatoes isolated from other parts of the world (KX631235.1) AG-3-PT, and KX631236.1 (AG-3-PT) [20].

    Figure 1.  Evolutionary relationships of taxa; the evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method [21]. The optimal tree with the sum of branch length = 2.89804503 is shown. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches [22]. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Tamura 3-parameter method [23] and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. This analysis involved 62 nucleotide sequences. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair (pair wise deletion option). There were a total of 1045 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted using MEGA X software [24].
    Figure 2.  Evolutionary relationships of taxa; the evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method [21]. The optimal tree with the sum of branch length = 0.21783581 is shown. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches [22]. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Tamura 3-parameter method [23] and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. This analysis involved 26 nucleotide sequences. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair (pair wise deletion option). There were a total of 757 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted using MEGA X software [24].

    Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method [21]. The optimal tree with a sum of branch lengths of 0.22 mm is shown. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches [22]. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Tamura 3-parameter method [23] and are in units of the number of base substitutions per site. The phylogenetic trees were constructed using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis [MEGA X] software [24].

    All the confirmed Rhizoctonia isolates as AG-3PT by the ITS rDNA sequencing were used in this study. Slides with a thin covering of water agar used to detect microscopic somatic compatibility reactions (WA Oxoid) were made for the pairings. The interaction was evaluated under a light microscope using safranin O staining [25]. According to the method of Carling [26], we determined the number of fields in each interaction category (C0, C1, C2, and C3) in 15 visual fields. The fusion frequency has been determined as %FF = (A*100)/B. According to MacNish et al. [27], the macroscopic somatic reactions were defined as merge and tuft according to predefined categories after the plates were incubated at 15 ℃ for 21 days and assayed.

    Twelve plant species were tested as potential hosts for three isolates confirmed as AG-3PT, which were selected randomly from each of the three regions to be tested for their pathogenicity. These were seedlings of carrot (Daucus carota L.), bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), pea (Pisum sativum L.), soybean (Glycine max), corn (Zea mays L.), Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), pepper (Capsicum annuum L.), okra (Abelmoschus esculentus), cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L.) and potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). The seeds were germinated in peat. The seedlings were planted in pots containing sterile sand. After five days, each plant was inoculated with a piece of a Rhizoctonia growth with a diameter of 5 mm from the fungal colonies' margins. This part of the mycelium was placed one cm deep next to the seedling's stem and covered with sterile quartz sand to prevent drying. As per Carling and Leiner [28], potato plants were used as a positive control. Plants were incubated at 20 ℃ for a 12 hour photoperiod in a growth chamber, irrigated with distilled water every 2–3 days, and fertilized with a nutrient solution weekly [29]. The symptoms on the stems and roots were evaluated after 15 days of inoculation. On the stems, the symptoms were classified as small superficial lesions (SS L = lesions size < 5 mm) or cankers (C). On the roots, disease incidence, and lesion categories were characterized as on the stems. Re-isolation was carried out on infected and healthy plant tissues to confirm the presence of fungi in the tested plants.

    The experimental design for the pathogenicity test was a complete randomized block design with three replications. The data were subjected to an analysis of variance, and the treatment means were separated by Duncan's multiple range test (α = 0.05). The data were analyzed using GENSTAT 14th Edition (VSN International).

    For primary identification, morphological characterization was performed on all 57 isolates. Phenotypically, all conformed to Rhizoctonia. However, their identity was determined by sequencing the internal transcribed spacer (ITS-rDNA). Surprisingly, only 21 isolates were confirmed as R. solani, while the rest were distributed among different fungi species described in Table 2. It was noticed that Aspergillus spp. and Fusarium spp. were the most predominant after Rhizoctonia spp.

    Table 2.  The identity of the isolated mold species from potato samples studied in this project based on the ITS-rDNA sequencing.
    Group Group of the isolated mold No of isolates % Isolates
    1 Alternaria spp. 4 7
    2 Aspergillus spp. 15 26.3
    3 Botryotrichum spp. 1 1.8
    4 Cylindrocarpon spp. 1 1.8
    5 Fusarium spp. 9 15.7
    6 Gymnosascus spp. 1 1.8
    7 Rhizoctonia spp. 21 36.8
    8 Rhizopus spp. 1 1.8
    9 Trichoderma spp. 4 7
    Total 57 100

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The obtained rDNA sequences were deposited in the GenBank, and accession numbers were assigned (Table 3). All the Rhizoctonia isolates (100%) were of anastomosis group 3 (AG-3PT). Among these, 12 isolates were isolated from stem cankers, while the other nine isolates were isolated from sclerotia on the mother tubers.

    Table 3.  The isolates with their names and ITS sequence ID and the GenBank accession numbers.
    Isolate Isolate identity Accession numbers
    1 Alternaria_chlamydosporigena_R18 MN258559
    2 Alternaria_chlamydosporigena_R21_1 MN258560
    3 Alternaria_chlamydosporigena_R30 MN258561
    4 Alternaria_chlamydosporigena_R8 MN258562
    5 Aspergillus_fumigatus_11.6-R34_06-35-29 MN258563
    6 Aspergillus_fumigatus_11.6-R48_07-36-02 MN258564
    7 Aspergillus_fumigatus_R17 MN258565
    8 Aspergillus_fumigatus_R22-- MN258566
    9 Aspergillus_fumigatus_R29 MN258567
    10 Aspergillus_fumigatus_R39 MN258568
    11 Aspergillus_fumigatus_R47 MN258569
    12 Aspergillus_niger_R1 MN258570
    13 Aspergillus_niger_R20_ MN258571
    14 Aspergillus_niger_R3 MN258572
    15 Aspergillus_niger_R8_1.phd MN258573
    16 Aspergillus_ochraceus_R29.2 MN258574
    17 Aspergillus_ruber_R9 MN258575
    18 Aspergillus_rugulosus_R53-DOWN MN258576
    19 Aspergillus_ustus_R23_1 MN258577
    20 Botryotrichum_piluliferum_R50 MN258578
    21 Cylindrocarpon_olidum_R36 MN258579
    22 Fusarium_equiseti_11.6-R7_07-36-02 MN258580
    23 Fusarium_equiseti_R11D MN258581
    24 Fusarium_equiseti_R16 MN258582
    25 Fusarium_equiseti_R17_e MN258583
    26 Fusarium_equiseti_R22 MN258584
    27 Fusarium_redolens_R10 MN258585
    28 Fusarium_solani_R37 MN258587
    29 Fusarium_solani_R45 MN258588
    30 Fusarium_solani_R49-DOWN MN258589
    31 Gymnoascus_reesii_R54 MN258590
    32 Rhizoctonia_solani_AG-3_R11 MN258591
    33 Rhizoctonia_solani_AG-3_R24 MN258592
    34 Rhizoctonia_solani_AG-3_R25 MN258593
    35 Rhizoctonia_solani_AG-3_R26 MN258594
    36 Rhizoctonia_solani_AG-3_R28-UP MN258595
    37 Rhizoctonia_solani_AG-3_R3_r MN258596
    38 Rhizoctonia_solani_AG-3_R32 MN258597
    39 Rhizoctonia_solani_AG-3_R38 MN258598
    40 Rhizoctonia_solani_AG-3_R40 MN258599
    41 Rhizoctonia_solani_AG-3_R41-UP MN258600
    42 Rhizoctonia_solani_AG-3_R43 MN258601
    43 Rhizoctonia_solani_AG-3_R44 MN258602
    44 Rhizoctonia_solani_AG-3_R46 MN258603
    45 Rhizoctonia_solani_AG-3_R49-UP MN258604
    46 Rhizoctonia_solani_AG-3_R51_1 MN258605
    47 Rhizoctonia_solani_AG-3_R53-UP MN258606
    48 Rhizoctonia_solani_AG-3_R57 MN258607
    49 Rhizoctonia_solani_AG-3_R59 MN258608
    50 Rhizoctonia_solani_AG-3_R6 MN258609
    51 Rhizoctonia_solani_AG-3_R9_r MN258610
    52 Rhizopus_oryzae_R21 MN258611
    53 Trichoderma_guizhouense_R4 MN258612
    54 Trichoderma_harzianum_R2 MN258613
    55 Trichoderma_harzianum_R21_th MN258614
    56 Trichoderma_harzianum_R52 MN258615
    57 Fusarium_solani_R35 MN258586

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The phylogenetic tree was constructed for all 57 isolates (Figure 1) to study the clonal relationship among all the fungi that grow and cause diseases in potatoes. As expected, all strains of R. solani clustered together along with the out group isolates that infect potatoes. Indeed, the phylogenetic tree separated each species into a single cluster. Except for a few isolates that appeared to cluster with isolates from different species, this was true for the majority of fungal species. The other tree was constructed for the 21 Rhizoctonia isolates (Figure 2) and five other isolates obtained from published sequences. The bootstrap values on all nodes showed no significant differences between our isolates, which reflect their common source with the two AG3 isolates from China [30] that appeared within the Jordan AG3 isolates. However, the other three outer isolates, the AG3 isolates (TB and TM) and the out group AG-2-1 isolates, appeared distant from the potato AG3 group isolated in this study.

    The hyphal fusion ratio of 15 isolates belonging to AG3 ranged from 45 to 96%. In addition, a high percentage of isolates have frequencies between 47 and 74%, which indicates a lack of harmony between individuals indicating that the anastomosis reaction was positive and the frequency of hyphal fusion exceeded 50%. About 86.7% of isolates pairs were evaluated, and the formation of tufts was common in the macroscopic somatic assay indicating a somatic incompatibility between the isolates. However, the perfect fusion occurred in only 13.3% of the pairs tested, indicating their compatibility (Figure 3). Table 4 presents the results of the hyphal interaction.

    Figure 3.  The macroscopic anastomosis reaction between Rhizoctonia solani AG-3PT isolates. (a) Strong tuft reaction between isolates collected in the same field, (b) Strong tuft reaction between isolates collected in the different fields, (c) Mild tuft reaction between isolates collected in the different fields, (d) Merge tuft reaction between isolates collected in the different fields. Numbers underneath each figure are codes for isolate pairs, depending on the geographic source of the isolates. The microscopic images below show different degrees of tuft reaction between isolates.
    Table 4.  Results of pairings in hyphal interaction assays performed on 15 isolates with tester isolates of Rhizoctonia solani (C0, no interaction; C1, hyphal contact; C2, killing reaction; C3, fusion with no cell death).
    AG/3 Isolate R 06 R 09 R 11 R 25 R 28 R 32 R 38 R 40 R 41 R 44 R 46 R 51 R 53 R 57 R 59
    R 06 C3 C1 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C3 C2 C2
    R 09 C3 C2 C2 C1 C2 C2 C2 C1 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2
    R 11 C3 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2
    R 25 C3 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C3 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2
    R 28 C3 C2 C1 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C1
    R 32 C3 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C1 C2 C2
    R 38 C3 C2 C1 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2
    R 40 C3 C3 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2
    R 41 C3 C2 C2 C2 C2 C1 C2
    R 44 C3 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2
    R 46 C3 C2 C2 C2 C1
    R 51 C3 C2 C2 C2
    R 53 C3 C2 C2
    R 57 C3 C2
    R 59 C3

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Isolates of R. solani AG3-PT caused large lesions (>10 mm) on the stems of potato, tomato, pepper, and okra, while their roots did not show any symptoms. As for the roots of pea, bean, soybean, wheat, barley, corn, and carrot plants, the AG3-PT isolates caused numerous small lesions. Furthermore, the AG3-PT isolates caused lesions on the stems of soybean, barley, corn, and carrot plants while not causing any lesions on pea, bean, or wheat. The cauliflower showed no signs of disease (Table 5 and Figure 4).

    Table 5.  Host range and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia solani AG-3 isolates obtained from commercial potato fields in the Jordan Valley.
    Host Plants Stem lesion Size(cm) Root lesion Diseased roots (%)
    Daucus carota Carrots NI* 0.0a NI/C 52.8b
    Brassica oleracea Cauliflower NI 0.0a NI 0.0a
    Pisum sativum Peas NI 0.0a SSL/C 21.4c
    Phaseolus vulgaris Bean NI 0.0a SSL 38.7d
    Glycine max Soybean SSL/C 0.32b SSL/C 62.3e
    Zea mays Corn SSL 0.48c SSL 33.9d
    Triticum aestivum Wheat NI 0.00a SSL 0.07a
    Hordeum vulgare Barely SSL 0.21d SSL 0.22c
    Solanum lycopersicum Tomato NI/C 1.04e NI 0.0a
    Capsicum annuum Pepper C 1.40f NI 0.0a
    Abelmoschus esculentus Okra C 1.02e NI 0.0a
    Solanum tuberosum Potato C 1.50f NI 0.0a
    *Stem and root lesions were categorized as follows: NI (non-infected); SS L (superficial small lesion) and C (canker). The size of the lesions is the average of 15 plants. Means followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different from each other according to Duncan's Multiple Range Test (α = 0.05).

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 4.  Symptoms of infection by Rhizoctonia solani AG-3PT isolates on different Hosts. (a) on Phaseolus vulgaris, (b) on Pisum sativum, (c) on Glycine max, (d) on Solanum lycopersicum, (e) on Capsicum annuum, (f) on Triticum aestivum, (g) on Hordeum vulgare, (h) on Zea mays, (i) on Brassica oleracea, (j) on Daucus carota, (k) on Abelmoschus esculentus, (l) on Solanum tuberosum.

    This is the first study in Jordan to describe and characterize the disease-causing pathogens of potato crops and the identification of these pathogens both at the phenotypic and genotypic levels. Despite the fact that R. solani is generally thought to be the major pathogen infecting potatoes, several other fungi species were also isolated from infected potatoes grown in the Jordan Valley. The types of these pathogenic fungi and their distribution are presented in Table 2. Many of these fungi are known plant pathogens and could inflect various degrees of damage to potato plants as well as to other crop plants [31]. The most prevalent species among these isolated pathogens was R. solani (35%). All of the isolates' species identities were determined by ITS rDNA sequencing (Table 2). As inferred from the ITS rDNA sequences, R. solani isolates found in Jordan that were recovered from various potato diseases were all AG3-PT (100%). This result confirms previous reports about the predominance of AG3-PT on potato crops [32,33,34,35,36,37]. Furthermore, the phylogenetic analysis revealed that the isolates of R. solani are associated with each other with a low degree of heterogeneity which could be due to the differences in the locations of samples collection (north, central, and south of Jordan Valley). Interestingly, AG3-PT isolates from China clustered with the AG3-PT isolates from Jordan. In contrast, the cluster analysis showed that AG3-TB and AG3-TM did not cluster with the AG3-PT isolates, indicating the low heterogeneity among the AG3-PT and the vast difference between the AG3-PT and the AG3-TB or AG3-TM as inferred from the phylogenetic analysis. In addition to its high virulence on potatoes, one of the reasons AG3-PT is so common in potatoes is its ability to form sclerotia (black scurf) on tubers, inflicting severe damage to the corp. The results are in accordance with the observations of Lehtonen et al. [38] who postulated that AG3-PT is much more efficient in producing sclerotia on tubers than other AG subgroups, reflecting the highly specialized nature of AG3-PT in infecting potatoes and thus being more aggressive. Nonetheless, other AG groups inflict severe damage to other plants, such as tomatoes and tobacco [39,40].

    The correlation between microscopic killing anastomosis (C2 reaction) and perfect fusion (C3 reaction) with the corresponding macroscopic somatic interactions "tuft" and "merge" has been reported for some R. solani groups, such as AG8 [27] and AG3-TB from tobacco [41], as well as R. solani AG3-PT from potatoes [3]. Nevertheless, the macroscopic somatic interactions were not good predictors for the microscopic anastomosis reactions between isolates of the soybean-infecting pathogen R. solani AG1-IA [42]. Similar to previous reports on the soybean-infecting pathogen, perfect fusion and killing anastomosis reactions at the microscopic level were not distinguished in this study. Thus, a correlation between macroscopic and microscopic for R solani AG3-PT was not established. The results of this study indicated incompatibility between the tested isolates, as some fusions appeared in large quantities of aerial mycelia (tuft) (Fig 3a, b) indicating a high level of genetic diversity among the isolates (Figure 3a, b). Somatic compatibility existed in only 13.3% of the pairs. Further, the obtained results indicated that R. solani AG3 is capable of infecting different plant species and inflicting severe damage, which is consistent with previous reports that even specialized mold pathogens have shown some levels of damage in hosts distinct from their own original host [3,16,39,43,44,45,46]. Indeed, these results have shown the need to adopt crop rotation strategy and the use of specific fungicides to control R. solani from accumulating in the soil and infecting other plants that showed readiness to be infected by this pathogen. In addition, even though the fungal inoculums could remain viable on plant debris and hidden roots for a long time, planting cauliflower as a non-host to interrupt the pathogen's life cycle can be a part of the fighting strategy against this mold [31].

    This work has provided knowledge about the R. solani groups in different locations in Jordan. Further, it has confirmed the predominance of AG3-PT associated with potato disease in Jordan. The significance of determining the AG group for a location could be used as a guide for selecting an effective disease management regimen. This belief stems from the idea that genetic differences exist among the different AG groups, which might be reflected in susceptibility/resistance to a certain fungicide [34,40]. Further, understanding the host range for the different AG groups is of prime importance for fighting strategies [44].

    The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing and the phylogenetic analysis of the Rhizoctonia solani isolates confirmed the identity of the isolates in which AG-PT3 was the major pathogen affecting the potato crop in Jordan.

    The obtained results for the different AG groups can be used to implement strategies for combating this fungus. Crop rotation is one of the regimens that can break the fungi's life cycle by growing non-host-specific crops and choosing the most appropriate fungicide for a particular AG group.

    The authors would like to acknowledge Jordan University of Science and Technology for providing facilities to complete this project in its laboratories.

    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.



    [1] Wibberg D, Genzel F, Verwaaijen B, et al. (2017) Draft genome sequence of the potato pathogen Rhizoctonia solani AG3-PT isolate Ben3. Arch Microbiol 199: 1065–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-017-1394-x doi: 10.1007/s00203-017-1394-x
    [2] Boruah S, Dutta P (2021) Fungus mediated biogenic synthesis and characterization of chitosan nanoparticles and its combine effect with Trichoderma asperellum against Fusarium oxysporum, Sclerotium rolfsii and Rhizoctonia solani. Indian Phytopathol 74: 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42360-020-00289-w doi: 10.1007/s42360-020-00289-w
    [3] Muzhinji N, Truter M, Woodhall JW, et al. (2015) Anastomosis groups and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia solani and binucleate Rhizoctonia from potato in South Africa. Plant Dis 99: 1790–1802. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-02-15-0236-RE doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-15-0236-RE
    [4] Rafiq M, Javaid A, Shoaib A (2021) Antifungal activity of methanolic leaf extract of Carthamus oxycantha against Rhizoctonia solani. Pak J Bot 53: 1133–1139. https://doi.org/10.30848/PJB2021-3(17) doi: 10.30848/PJB2021-3(17)
    [5] Brierley JL, Hilton AJ, Wale SJ, et al. (2016) The relative importance of seed-and soil-borne inoculum of Rhizoctonia solani AG-3 in causing black scurf on potato. Potato Res 59: 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-016-9320-1 doi: 10.1007/s11540-016-9320-1
    [6] Muzhinji N, Woodhall JW, Truter M, et al. (2014) Elephant hide and growth cracking on potato tubers caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG3-PT in South Africa. Plant Dis 98: 570–570. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-08-13-0815-PDN doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-13-0815-PDN
    [7] Larkin RP (2016) Impacts of biocontrol products on Rhizoctonia disease of potato and soil microbial communities, and their persistence in soil. Crop Prot 90: 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.08.012 doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2016.08.012
    [8] Stefańczyk E, Sobkowiak S, Brylińska M, et al. (2016) Diversity of Fusarium spp. associated with dry rot of potato tubers in Poland. Eur J Plant Pathol 145: 871–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-016-0875-0 doi: 10.1007/s10658-016-0875-0
    [9] Mengesha WK, Gill WM, Powell SM, et al. (2017) A study of selected factors affecting efficacy of compost tea against several fungal pathogens of potato. J Appl Microbiol 123: 732–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13530 doi: 10.1111/jam.13530
    [10] Banville GJ (1989) Yield losses and damage to potato plants caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. Am Potato J 66: 821–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853963 doi: 10.1007/BF02853963
    [11] Zhang J, Wang Y, Zhao Y, et al. (2020) Transcriptome analysis reveals Nitrogen deficiency induced alterations in leaf and root of three cultivars of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). PloS One 15: e0240662. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240662 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240662
    [12] Abu‐El Samen FM, Al‐Bdour NM (2011) Prevalence of fungal and fungus‐like diseases on potato seed tubers imported from Europe to Jordan. EPPO Bull 41: 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.2011.02514.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2338.2011.02514.x
    [13] Carling DE, Kuninaga S, Brainard KA (2002) Hyphal anastomosis reactions, rDNA-internal transcribed spacer sequences, and virulence levels among subsets of Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group-2 (AG-2) and AG-BI. Phytopathology 92: 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.1.43 doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.1.43
    [14] Woodhall JW, Lees AK, Edwards SG, et al. (2007) Characterization of Rhizoctonia solani from potato in Great Britain. Plant Pathol 56: 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2006.01545.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2006.01545.x
    [15] Inokuti EM, Reis A, Ceresini PC, et al. (2019) Diversity and pathogenicity of anastomosis groups of Rhizoctonia associated with potato stem canker and black scurf diseases in Brazil. Eur J Plant Pathol 153: 1333–1339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-018-01627-5 doi: 10.1007/s10658-018-01627-5
    [16] Carling DE, Leiner RH (1990) Virulence of isolates of Rhizoctonia solani AG-3 collected from potato plant organs and soil. Plant Dis 74: 901–3. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-74-0901 doi: 10.1094/PD-74-0901
    [17] Liu D, Coloe S, Baird R, et al. (2000) Rapid mini-preparation of fungal DNA for PCR. J Clin Microbiol 38: 471–471. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.38.1.471-471.2000 doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.1.471-471.2000
    [18] Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes‐application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2: 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x
    [19] WhiteTJ, Bruns T, Lee SJ, et al. (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protoc: Guide Methods Appl 18: 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
    [20] Tamura K (1992) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G+ C-content biases. Mol Biol Evol 9: 678–687.
    [21] Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4: 406–425.
    [22] Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x
    [23] Tamura K, Nei M, Kumar S (2004) Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101: 11030–11035. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404206101 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404206101
    [24] Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, et al. (2018) MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35: 1547. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096 doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096
    [25] Bandoni RJ (1979) Safranin O as a rapid nuclear stain for fungi. Mycologia 71: 873–874. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1979.12021088 doi: 10.1080/00275514.1979.12021088
    [26] Carling DE (1996) Grouping in Rhizoctonia solani by hyphal anastomosis reaction. In: Rhizoctonia species: taxonomy, molecular biology, ecology, pathology and disease control Springer, Dordrecht, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2901-7_3
    [27] MacNish GC, Carling DE, Brainard KA (1997) Relationship of microscopic and macroscopic vegetative reactions in Rhizoctonia solani and the occurrence of vegetatively compatible populations (VCPs) in AG-8. Mycol Res 101: 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756296002171 doi: 10.1017/S0953756296002171
    [28] Carling DE, Leiner RH (1986) Isolation and characterization of Rhizoctonia solani and binucleata R. solani-like fungi from aerial stems and subterranean organs of potato plants. Phytopathology 76: 725–729. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-76-725 doi: 10.1094/Phyto-76-725
    [29] Classic Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
    [30] Yang S, Min F, Wang W, et al. (2017) Anastomosis group and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia solani associated with stem canker and black scurf of potato in Heilongjiang Province of China. Am J Potato Res 94: 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-016-9535-3 doi: 10.1007/s12230-016-9535-3
    [31] Ibrahim ME (2017) In vitro antagonistic activity of Trichoderma harzianum against Rhizoctonia solani the causative agent of potato black scurf and stem canker. Egypt J Bot 57: 173–185. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejbo.2017.903.1067 doi: 10.21608/ejbo.2017.903.1067
    [32] Anguiz R, Martin C (1989) Anastomosis groups, pathogenicity and other characteristics of Rhizoctonia solani isolated from potato in Peru. Plant Dis 73: 99–201. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-73-0199 doi: 10.1094/PD-73-0199
    [33] Balali GR, Neate SM, Scott ES, et al. (1995) Anastomosis group and pathogenicity of isolates of Rhizoctonia solani from potato crops in South Australia. Plant Pathol 44: 1050–1057. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1995.tb02664.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.1995.tb02664.x
    [34] Campion C, Chatot C, Perraton B, et al (2003) Anastomosis groups, pathogenicity and sensitivity to fungicides of Rhizoctonia solani isolates collected on potato crops in France. Eur J Plant Pathol 109: 983–992. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EJPP.0000003829.83671.8f doi: 10.1023/B:EJPP.0000003829.83671.8f
    [35] Truter M, Wehner FC (2004) Anastomosis grouping of Rhizoctonia solani associated with black scurf and stem canker of potato in South Africa. Plant Dis 88: 83–83. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.1.83B doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.1.83B
    [36] Fiers M, Edel-Hermann V, Héraud C, et al. (2011) Genetic diversity of Rhizoctonia solani associated with potato tubers in France. Mycologia 103: 1230–1244. https://doi.org/10.3852/10-231 doi: 10.3852/10-231
    [37] Das S, Shah FA, Butler RC, et al. (2014) Genetic variability and pathogenicity of R hizoctonia solani associated with black scurf of potato in New Zealand. Plant Pathol 63: 651–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12139 doi: 10.1111/ppa.12139
    [38] Lehtonen MJ, Somervuo P, Valkonen JP (2008) Infection with Rhizoctonia solani induces defense genes and systemic resistance in potato sprouts grown without light. Phytopathology 98: 1190–1198. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-98-11-1190 doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-98-11-1190
    [39] Misawa T, Kuninaga S (2010) The first report of tomato foot rot caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG-3 PT and AG-2-Nt and its host range and molecular characterization. J Gen Plant Pathol 76: 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-010-0261-2 doi: 10.1007/s10327-010-0261-2
    [40] Gonzalez M, Pujol M, Metraux JP, et al. (2011) Tobacco leaf spot and root rot caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kühn. Mol Plant Pathol 12: 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00664.x doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00664.x
    [41] Ceresini PC, Shew HD, Vilgalys RJ, et al. (2002) Genetic diversity of Rhizoctonia solani AG-3 from potato and tobacco in North Carolina. Mycologia 94: 437–449. doi: 10.1080/15572536.2003.11833209
    [42] Campos APD, Ceresini PC (2006) Somatic incompatibility in Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA of soybean. Summa Phytopathol 32: 247–254. doi: 10.1590/S0100-54052006000300006
    [43] Anderson NA (1982) The genetics and pathology of Rhizoctonia solani. Annu Rev Phytopathol 20: 329–347. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.20.090182.001553
    [44] Sneh B, Jabaji-Hare S, Neate SM, et al. (2013) Rhizoctonia species: Taxonomy, molecular biology, ecology, pathology and disease control. Springer Science & Business Media.
    [45] Nelson B, Helms T, Christianson T, et al. (1996) Characterization and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia from soybean. Plant Dis 80: 74–80. doi: 10.1094/PD-80-0074
    [46] Tewoldemedhin YT, Lamprecht SC, McLeod AD, et al. (2006) Characterization of Rhizoctonia spp. recovered from crop plants used in rotational cropping systems in the Western Cape province of South Africa. Plant Dis 90: 1399–1406. doi: 10.1094/PD-90-1399
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Khotsofalang Mothibeli, Moleboheng Lekota, Mpho Liphoto, Motlatsi E. Morojele, Norman Muzhinji, First Report of Rhizoctonia solani Associated with Black Scurf of Potato Tubers in Lesotho, 2023, 12, 2312-9344, 87, 10.33687/phytopath.012.01.4377
    2. Syed Atif Hasan Naqvi, Aqleem Abbas, Muhammad Farhan, Rafia Kiran, Zeshan Hassan, Yasir Mehmood, Amjad Ali, Niaz Ahmed, Muhammad Zeeshan Hassan, Abdulwahed Fahad Alrefaei, Fatih Ölmez, Seung-Hwan Yang, Faheem Shehzad Baloch, Unveiling the Genetic Tapestry: Exploring Rhizoctonia solani AG-3 Anastomosis Groups in Potato Crops across Borders, 2024, 13, 2223-7747, 715, 10.3390/plants13050715
    3. Abdullah Y. Abdullah, Anas Al-Nabulsi, Mohammad Jamama’h, Batool Khataybeh, Mu’ath Al-Ghadi, Microbial Shelf Life and Quality Assessment of Broiler Breast Meat: The Role of Cold Storage and Carcass Weight, 2025, 14, 2304-8158, 640, 10.3390/foods14040640
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3007) PDF downloads(247) Cited by(3)

Figures and Tables

Figures(4)  /  Tables(5)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog