Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Research article

Consumers' stance on food waste in the Czech Republic, Poland, and Slovakia

  • This work focuses on the area of food waste from the subjective perspective of the consumers themselves. The key source of data is a questionnaire survey with a sample selection of 3,429 respondents from the Czech Republic, Poland, and Slovakia, which are countries with historical and cultural ties. This survey was orchestrated in 2019 and it aimed to uncover the consumers' stances on this area. For every country involved, the results proved that the most common reason for food waste is that the food spoils when stored. One's stance on food waste is influenced by identifiers such as age, education, economic activity, and perceived income. A significant difference between the surveyed countries can be seen in the fact that Poles have over a 10× greater chance of wasting the smallest amount of food. Descriptive statistics, contingency analysis, and logistic regression were used to analyze the data. It is evident that subsequent research is necessary in this area, ideally with a united methodology for every country in the European Union.

    Citation: Naďa Hazuchová, Jana Stávková, Agnieszka Siedlecka, Ľudmila Nagyová. Consumers' stance on food waste in the Czech Republic, Poland, and Slovakia[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(3): 637-658. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022040

    Related Papers:

    [1] Thornthan Sawangwan, Chompoonuth Porncharoennop, Harit Nimraksa . Antioxidant compounds from rice bran fermentation by lactic acid bacteria. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(2): 578-587. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021034
    [2] Ardiansyah, Fauziyyah Ariffa, Rizki Maryam Astuti, Wahyudi David, Dody Dwi Handoko, Slamet Budijanto, Hitoshi Shirakawa . Non-volatile compounds and blood pressure-lowering activity of Inpari 30 and Cempo Ireng fermented and non-fermented rice bran. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 337-359. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021021
    [3] Budi Suarti, Sukarno, Ardiansyah, Slamet Budijanto . Bio-active compounds, their antioxidant activities, and the physicochemical and pasting properties of both pigmented and non-pigmented fermented de-husked rice flour. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 49-64. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021004
    [4] Saranyu Khammuang, Kamonpan Sanachai, Methus Kittika, Kriengsak Lirdprapamongkol, Jisnuson Svasti, Rakrudee Sarnthima . Antioxidant potential of hydrolyzed proteins from Thai rice varieties and docking studies of novel peptides with free radicals. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2025, 10(2): 371-389. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2025019
    [5] Ki A. Sarwono, Rohmatussolihat Rohmatussolihat, Muh Watman, Shanti Ratnakomala, Wulansih D. Astuti, Rusli Fidriyanto, Roni Ridwan, Yantyati Widyastuti . Characteristics of fresh rice straw silage quality prepared with addition of lactic acid bacteria and crude cellulase. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(3): 481-499. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022030
    [6] Anderson de Moura Zanine, Breno de Moura Gimenez, Daniele de Jesus Ferreira, Michelle de Oliveira Maia Parente, Henrique Nunes Parente, Edson Mauro Santos, Glayciane Costa Gois, Fleming Sena Campos, Luana Milena Pinheiro Rodrigues, Jessica Maria de Sousa Oliveira, Nelquides Braz Viana, Daimy Salas Aguilar, George de Sousa Lima Paiva, Dilier Olivera Viciedo . Nutritional parameters of sheep fed diets based on grass silage with brewery residue and a concentrate with rice bran. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(4): 1049-1063. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024056
    [7] Slamet Budijanto, Yeni Kurniati, Lilis Nuraida, Fitriya Nur Annisa Dewi, Bambang Pontjo Priosoeryanto, Nancy Dewi Yuliana, Ardiansyah, Uus Saepuloh, Safrida, Hitoshi Shirakawa . The inhibition of colon cancer development by black rice bran on BALB/C Mice. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(3): 789-800. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024042
    [8] Ilaria Marotti, Francesca Truzzi, Camilla Tibaldi, Lorenzo Negri, Giovanni Dinelli . Evaluation of licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra L.) as a novel microgreen from the anti-inflammatory potential of polyphenols. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 1-13. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021001
    [9] Pattarabhorn Pakaweerachat, Worasaung Klinthong, Kazuhisa Ohtaguchi, Teerin Chysirichote . Simultaneous isoquercitin and gallic acid production of Aspergillus niger on Triphala byproduct under solid state fermentation in packed-bed bioreactor. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(2): 359-373. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023020
    [10] Heni Purwaningsih, Kristamtini, Pamudji Rahardjo, Bangun Prajanto Nusantoro, Erni Apriyati, Siti Dewi Indrasari, Rubiyo . The effect of different storage times and methods on the chemical and organoleptic properties of white cooked rice and black cooked rice. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(1): 184-196. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022012
  • This work focuses on the area of food waste from the subjective perspective of the consumers themselves. The key source of data is a questionnaire survey with a sample selection of 3,429 respondents from the Czech Republic, Poland, and Slovakia, which are countries with historical and cultural ties. This survey was orchestrated in 2019 and it aimed to uncover the consumers' stances on this area. For every country involved, the results proved that the most common reason for food waste is that the food spoils when stored. One's stance on food waste is influenced by identifiers such as age, education, economic activity, and perceived income. A significant difference between the surveyed countries can be seen in the fact that Poles have over a 10× greater chance of wasting the smallest amount of food. Descriptive statistics, contingency analysis, and logistic regression were used to analyze the data. It is evident that subsequent research is necessary in this area, ideally with a united methodology for every country in the European Union.



    Diabetes is a disease chronic caused by non-infectious metabolic disorder, characterized by hyperglycemic conditions or high blood glucose levels [1]. The most common diabetes is type 2 diabetes (T2D) which is caused by lifestyle factors and diet that causes obesity [2]. Postprandial hyperglycemia can be reduced by modulating the absorption of glucose in the body as it reduces the hydrolysis of carbohydrates. Pancreatic α-amylase is an enzyme in the initial stages of starch hydrolysis, and α-glucosidase subsequently hydrolyzes di- and oligosaccharides into glucose in the intestine [3]. Some bioactive components act as inhibitors that can inhibit the activity of the enzymes α-amylase and α-glucosidase, which can reduce the absorption rate of glucose and postprandial hyperglycemia. Digestive enzyme inhibitors are generally found in functional foods that contain many bioactive components such as polyphenols [4]. The condition of hyperglycemia will also encourage the formation of free radicals that trigger a state of oxidative stress in the body. Oxidative stress will reduce insulin secretion and inhibit glucose uptake in muscle cells and adipose [5], because oxidative stress can trigger different expressions of some genes involved [6]. Therefore the body needs antioxidant-rich foods to prevent oxidative stress. Testing the activity of antioxidants and inhibitors of α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes can be used as an approach to evaluate the antidiabetic potential of a functional food.

    Analog rice is an artificial rice which has the shape of white rice granules. It can be made from non-rice flour, cooked and consumed as white rice, and has high functional properties [7]. Therefore, analog rice can be consumed as a functional food and as an alternative staple food. Analog rice made from a mixture of corn, sago, yellow soybeans, and rice bran contains phenols, flavonoids, resistant starches, high food fiber and has a low IG value [8,9,10,11]. Analog rice from sorghum, red palm oil, yellow soybeans, and rice bran has been reported to have properties that inhibits colon cancer [12].

    In this study, analog rice was made using the raw materials of sorghum, yellow soybeans, black soybeans, and rice bran which are still underutilized. The selection of raw materials was based on the results of previous studies that show that sorghum [13], yellow soybeans [14], black soybeans [15], and rice bran [16] have antioxidant activity, are able to inhibit α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes, reduce blood glucose levels, increase insulin levels and regenerate β-pancreatic cells. Rice bran, which is a byproduct of hulling rice, still contains many bioactive components, food fiber and phytochemicals, so it can be used as a raw material for food products such as bakery products, drinks, and meatballs [17]. Adding rice bran to food products can also prevent chronic diseases such as cancer and cardiovascular disease [18]. Fermentation by the solid state fermentation (SSF) method can increase the amount of phenolic and antioxidant activity of rice bran which has been widely reported by several researchers [17,19,20]. Bran fermented for 4 days can increase phenolic compounds, flavonoids, γ-orizanol, α-tocopherol, and have antioxidant activity and inhibition of α-amylase [21]. There have been several studies on diabetes that have focused on bioactive components in functional foods. However, there have been no studies on antidiabetic activity of analog rice. Therefore this study was conducted to determine the effect of adding fermented black rice bran (FBB) and non-fermented black rice bran (NFBB) to analog rice on its potential as an antidiabetic. The results of this study are expected to provide scientific information about the potential of analog rice derived from local Indonesian raw materials as an antidiabetic.

    The materials used in this study are Numbu cultivar sorghum from a local farmer in Gadog, Indonesia, Grobogan cultivar yellow soybean from BB Biogen, Indonesia, Detam 1 cultivar black soybeans from Balitkabi in Malang, Indonesia, and Cempo Ireng cultivar black rice bran prepared from a paddy which was bought from local farmers in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. The skin of the black rice was polished by rice mill processing (Satake Grain Testing Mill, Japan). The FBB was fermented by the SSF method using Rhizopus oligosporus [21].

    Analog rice production was carried out following [7] with modifications to the temperature of extrusion. The analog rice was made in three stages: (1) mixing the raw material (flour) for 10 minutes with a dry mixer, (2) extruding process using the twin screw extruder (Berto BEX-DS-2256) at 100 ℃, (3) the final product of analog rice granules was dried at 60 ℃ for 3 hours. Four analog rice formulas were made (the formulas are subject to a patent application): AR1 analog rice from a mixture of sorghum, yellow soybean, and NFBB; AR2 analog rice from a mixture of sorghum, black soybean, and NFBB; AR3 analog rice from a mixture of sorghum, yellow soybean, and FBB; and AR4 analog rice from a mixture of sorghum, black soybean, and FBB.

    Analog rice was ground in a blender (Maspion, Indonesia), and passed through an 80 mesh sieve. A sample extraction was prepared [22] with slight modifications. Analog rice and 70% ethanol (1:10) were mixed for 24 hours, and then filtered with number 41 filter pads. The residue was re-extracted with 70% ethanol. All supernatants were collected and centrifuged at 1207 xg for 20 minutes. The ethanolic extract was evaporated using a rotary vacuum evaporator at 50 ℃ for 1 hour, and then exhaled with N2 gas until all the solvents were removed and stored at −18 ℃ until use. The extract was used for all analysis. All experiments were done in triplicate.

    The total phenolic content was determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent [19]. Absorbance was measured at 765 nm using a UV spectrophotometer. Gallic acid was used as a standard. Results were expressed as milligrams equivalent of gallic acid per 100 grams of sample (mgGAE/100g sample).

    The total flavonoid content was measured using Quercetin as a standard [23]. The absorbance was measured using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer at 432 nm. The results obtained were expressed in milligrams equivalent of quercetin per 100 grams sample (mgQE/100g sample).

    Total anthocyanin content was measured based on the pH difference method [24]. The absorbance was measured at 510 and 700 nm. The absorbance value was calculated as A = [(A510 − A700) at pH 1 − (A510 − A700) at pH 4.5]. The total anthocyanin was expressed as milligrams of cyanidin-3-glucoside (C3G) per gram of sample using a molar coefficient of 26.900 and a molecular weight of (BM) 449.

    Analysis of γ-oryzanol was performed using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, Agilent Technologies 1200 series) [25]. As much as 20 μL of the standard and extract samples were injected into a C-18 column (Zorbax Eclipse XDB C-18 column 4.6 x 150 nm) with a flow rate of 1 mL/minute. A mixture of methanol and acetonitrile (35:65) was used during the mobile phase using the HPLC UV-VIS detector at a wavelength of 325 nm. Results were expressed as milligrams per grams of dried sample (mg/g db).

    α-tocopherol was analyzed following the method 971.30 [26]. 20μL of extract was injected into HPLC (Agilent Technologies 1200 series) at 280 nm wavelength, then into a C-18 column (Zorbax Eclipse XDB C-18 column 4.6 x 150 nm), and a UV-VIS detector, methanol:isopropanol (98:2) as mobile phase, with a flow rate of 1 mL/minute. Results were expressed as milligrams per grams of dried sample (mg/g db).

    The DPPH-radical scavenging method was used to measure antioxidant activity [27]. The absorbance of the solution was measured at a wavelength of 517 nm using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer. DPPH-radical scavenging was expressed as a percentage calculated as [1-(abs of sample/blank abs)] x 100.

    Inhibition of the α-amylase was measured according to the method of Thalapaneni et al. [28]. Briefly, the extract sample was reacted with the amylase enzyme solution, then incubated at 37 ℃ for 10 minutes. 1% starch solution was added and re-incubated at 37 ℃ for 10 minutes. The 3, 5-dinitrosalicylate (DNS) reagent was added, incubated for 5 minutes in boiling water, then as much as 5 mL of distilled water was added and the absorbance was measured using a UV-VIS detector spectrophotometer at 540 nm. The α-amylase inhibition was calculated as [(abs control-abs sample)/abs control] x 100.

    The α-glucosidase assay was carried out based on the method of Sancheti et al. [29]. A phosphate buffer solution 0.1 M (pH 7), 4-nitrophenyl α-Dglucopyranoside 0.5 mM, 10 µL extract sample and 25 µL α-glucosidase enzyme solution (1 mg/mL in 0.01 M phosphate buffer, pH 7) were reacted, and then incubated at 37 ℃ for 30 minutes. The reaction was stopped by adding sodium carbonate 100 µL (0.2 M). The inhibition of α-glucosidase was measured using a microplate reader at a wavelength of 410 nm. The percent inhibition was calculated as [1-(abs sample /abs control)] x 100.

    Data were analyzed using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Duncan's multiple range test (p < 0.05). Data values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (Mean ± SD).

    Phenolic content in analog rice ranged from 429.31–758.61 mg GAE/100g (Table 1) and was significantly different (p < 0.05). Analog rice with the addition of FBB has a higher phenolic content compared to rice with the addition of NFBB in the same type of soybeans; AR4 > AR2 and AR3 > AR1. This result shows that the added FBB can increase the phenolic content of analog rice products. This is in accordance with the results of previous studies which showed that the phenolic content in FBB increased by 57.39% due to the fermentation process [21]. In this study it was found that analog rice using black soybeans with the addition of FBB and NFBB had a higher phenolic content, compared to yellow soybeans. This can be attributed to the higher phenolic content of black soybeans compared to yellow soybeans (258.02 mg GAE/100g versus 155.15 mg GAE/100g, data were not shown). This means that the phenolic content of analog rice is also strongly influenced by the raw materials used. This result was also supported by previous research [9] which stated that analog rice using raw materials of sorghum had a total phenolic content of 18 mgGAE/100g, while analog rice from composit sorghum and yellow soybeans had 24 mgGAE/100g.

    Table 1.  Chemical composition of analog rice* (db).
    Content AR1 AR2 AR3 AR4
    Total Phenol (mgAGE/100g) 429.31 ± 0.72a 636.56 ± 0.82c 513.41 ± 1.06b 758.61 ± 0.93d
    Total Flavonoid (mgQE/100g) 235.03 ± 0.96a 354.97 ± 0.0.44c 318.72 ± 1.24b 374.62 ± 0.87d
    Total Anthochyanin (mgC3G/g) 42.51 ± 0.44a 70.89 ± 0.10b 72.26 ± 0.24c 78.88 ± 0.18d
    γ-Oryzanol (mg/g) 2.84 ± 0.42a 2.77 ± 0.36a 3.37 ± 0.37a 3.36 ± 0.39a
    α-Tocopherol (µg/g) 14.11 ± 0.29a 24.75 ± 3.16b 86.18 ± 0.25c 126.16 ± 0.75d
    *AR1: sorghum, yellow soybeans, and NFBB; AR2: sorghum, black soybeans and NFBB; AR3: sorghum, yellow soybeans and FBB; AR4: sorghum, black soybeans and FBB. Means ± standard deviasi with the same letter on the same row differ no significantly at the test level of 5%.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The flavonoid content of analog rice ranged from 235.03–374.62 mgQE/100g and was significantly different (p < 0.05). The highest content was found in AR4 followed by AR2, AR3 and AR1. As with phenols, the flavonoid content of analog rice in the same type of soybeans with the addition of FBB is higher than with the addition of NFBB. Black soybeans in the AR4 and AR2 have a higher flavonoid content when compared to analog rice using yellow soybeans in AR3 and AR1. This is presumably because black soybeans have a higher flavonoid content. According to [30], the flavonoid content in black soybeans is 6 times higher (2.57 mg/g) than yellow soybeans (0.41 mg/g).

    Anthocyanin content of analog rice is found to be higher with the addition of FBB than NFBB. The highest amount of anthocyanin obtained in this study was 78.88 mg/g (AR4) followed by AR3 (72.26 mg/g), then AR2 (70.89 mg/g) and AR1 (42.51 mg/g). The addition of FBB which has an anthocyanin content of 96.38 mg/g [21] contributed to the increase in anthocyanin levels of analog rice products. Black soybeans are also reported to contain 1.044 mg/g of anthocyanis [31], so AR2 using black soybeans and NFBB has high levels of anthocyanins as well (Table 1).

    The addition of FBB to analog rice can increase total phenolic, flavonoid and anthocyanin content. The SSF technique is an alternative to increase the free phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in food products [32]. Koji prepared from raw beans uses the SSF technique with Rhizopus sp., which has high antioxidant activity and is associated with increased total phenolic and anthocyanin content [33]. During the SSF process, hydrolysis of the glycosidic bonds into free aglycones occurred, which contributed to the high value of antioxidant activity [34].

    The γ-oryzanol compound ranges from 2.84–3.36 mg/g (Table 1), not significantly different among the four analog rice formulas. The total amount of α-tocopherol obtained was significantly different for all four analog rice formulas. The highest amount of α-tocopherol was 126.16 µg/g in AR4 followed by AR3 which had 86.18 µg/g with added FBB, and the lowest content was found in AR2 (24.75 µg/g) and AR1 (14.11 µg/g) which contained added NFBB. The amount of γ-oryzanol and α-tocopherol compounds obtained in analog rice are higher when compared to the content of γ-orizanol (0.041 mg/g) and α-tocopherol (3 µg/g) in white rice [35]. This is presumably due to the addition of black rice bran which contains a lot of γ-oryzanol 1.85–4.21 mg/g [36] and α-tocopherol 43.57–150 µg/g [37]. According to [36] the addition of FBB to analog rice contributes to the increase of γ -oryzanol and α-tocopherol. Enzyme activity during the fermentation process is also capable of releasing bound forms of γ-orizanol and α-tocopherol into free forms and have high bioavailability [39].

    γ -oryzanol and α-tocopherol are antioxidant components, making up 38.7–41.1% and 1.2% of the total antioxidant components (respectively) found in bran. The γ-oryzanol is the main antioxidant, and α-tocopherol is found in smaller amounts. The α-tocopherol can prevent oxidation of the body by donating hydrogen atoms from its hydroxyl groups to free radicals that often occur in diabetics [40].

    Antioxidant activity in the analog rice was determined using the DPPH-radical scavenging method. The results showed that the scavenging ability of DPPH radicals ranged from 40.92–65.52% (Figure 1). The lowest antioxidant activity was found in AR1 and the highest was found in AR4. Antioxidants are naturally present in food, and can be increased by fermentation techniques [41]. Soy products fermented using the SSF technique have high antioxidant activity compared to non-fermented products [42]. This study also found that analog rice with the addition of FBB has high antioxidant activity. The phenolic aglycone obtained from fermentation has the highest antioxidant activity compared to the glycoside form [43]. It is also thought to be related to the number of free hydroxyl groups phenolic compounds and flavonoids obtained during SSF. The hydroxyl group can be a hydrogen donor for DPPH free radicals so antioxidant activity increases [44].

    Figure 1.  Antioxidant activity of analog rice (100 µg/mL). Different letters indicate a significantly difference by Duncan's Multiple Range Test (p < 0.05). Description of analog rice refers to Table 1.

    Paiva et al. [45] stated that antioxidant activity has a positive correlation with phenolic components. This study also found a positive correlation between phenolic components and antioxidant activity, namely r = 0.90. DPPH free radical scavenging activity is also associated with high anthocyanin content in analog rice. This is in accordance with research by Laokuldilok et al. [40] which stated that pigmented rice bran showed high free radical scavenging activity–6 times that of white rice bran. In addition, it is also supported by a positive correlation value (r = 0.92) between anthocyanins and antioxidant activity.

    α-Amylase and α-glucosidase are enzymes that catalyze the degradation of starch into glucose for absorption by the body. Inhibition of these enzymes is useful for controlling excessive blood glucose and regulating hyperglycemia that causes diabetes [46]. Previous studies have reported that inhibition of the α-glucosidase enzyme by inhibitors can be one of the most effective ways to control type 2 diabetes [47].

    The anti-amylase activity of analog rice is presented in Figure 2A. The percentage of inhibition of analog rice to α-amylase ranges from 53.03 ± 1.18 %–65.51 ± 0.51 %. Analog rice with the addition of FBB significantly (p < 0.05) had higher anti-amylase activity ranging from 63.16–65.51%, compared to analog rice with NFBB only 53.03–55.20%. The inhibitory activity of analog rice to α-glukosidase ranged from 58.29–62.09% (Figure 2B). The highest inhibitory activity was obtained in AR4, which was made from black soybeans and FBB (62.09%), and it was significantly different (p < 0.05) from other analog rice.

    Figure 2.  Inhibitory α-amylase (A) and α-glucosidase (B) in analog rice. Different letters indicate a significantly difference by Duncan's Multiple Range Test (p < 0.05). Description of analog rice refers to Table 1.

    The inhibitory activity of analog rice to α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes is thought to be related to the phenolic content in analog rice. Analog rice with the addition of FBB has higher total phenolic content due to the fermentation process being carried out. According to Sompong et al. [48] pigmented rice bran such as black rice bran is a rich source of phenolic components. The polyphenol and flavonoid content found in several foods is very effective at inhibiting α-amylase and α-glucosidase activity [49]. Phenolic compounds are able to inhibit α-amylase enzyme activity by binding to the α-amylase reactive side and changing its catalytic effect [50]. The polyhydroxyl group plays an important role in α-glukosidase inhibition [51]. In addition, polyphenols and flavonoids can mimic the pyranosil portion of α-glukosidase [52]. This study also found a positive correlation between total phenols and α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition (r = 0.60 and r = 0.87). Previous studies also reported that there was a positive correlation between total phenols and anti-amylase activity (r = 0.68) [53], and with α-glucosidase inhibitory activity [54]. The opposite has been reported by [11]; carrots, pumpkin, and radishes where phenolic content was not found, showed low inhibitory activity against α-amylase (<8.5%) and α-glucosidase (<2.5%).

    The results of this study indicate that analog rice with the raw materials sorghum, black soybeans, and fermented black rice bran (AR4) has the highest amount of total phenols, flavonoids, anthochyanins, γ -oryzanol and α-tocopherol compared to the others. The analog rice also had the highest inhibitory activity against DPPH free radicals, α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes. The findings of this study show that analog rice made from fermented rice bran has potential as an anti-diabetes functional food.

    We would like to thank to the Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education for the research grant.

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest.



    [1] FAO (2014) Save food: Global initiative on food loss and waste reduction definitional framework of food loss (Working Paper).
    [2] Borma A (2017) Food waste–A global problem. SEA-Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department 353–362.
    [3] Tukker A, Huppes G, Guinée J, et al. (2006) Environmental impact of products (EIPRO): Analysis of the life cycle environmental impacts related to the final consumption of the EU-25. EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Joint Research Centre. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ipp/pdf/eipro_report.pdf.
    [4] Quested TE, Marsh E, Stunell D, et al. (2013) Spaghetti soup: The complex world of food waste behaviours. Resour Conserv Recy 79: 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.04.011 doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.04.011
    [5] Grizzetti B, Pretato U, Lassaletta L, et al. (2013) The contribution of food waste to global and European nitrogen pollution. Environ Sci Policy 33: 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.05.013 doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.05.013
    [6] Flanagana A, Priyadarshini A (2021) A study of consumer behaviour towards food-waste in Ireland: Attitudes, quantities and global warming potentials. J Environ Manage 284: 112046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112046 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112046
    [7] Martins IBA, Oliveira D, Rosenthal A, et al. (2019) Brazilian consumer's perception of food processing technologies: A case study with fruit juice. Food Res Int 125: 108555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108555 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108555
    [8] Jeswani HK, Figueroa-Torres G, Azapagic A (2021) The extent of food waste generation in the UK and its environmental impacts. Sustain Prod Consump 26: 532–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.021 doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.021
    [9] Gustavsson J, Cederberg C, Sonesson U, et al. (2011) Global food Losses and food waste: Extension, causes and prevention. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i2697e.pdf.
    [10] Porter SD, Reay DS (2016) Addressing food supply chain and consumption inefficiencies: potential for climate change mitigation. Reg Environ Change 16: 2279–2290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0783-4 doi: 10.1007/s10113-015-0783-4
    [11] Wohner B, Pauer E, Heinrich V, et al. (2019) Packaging-related food losses and waste: An overview of drivers and issues. Sustainability 11: 264. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010264 doi: 10.3390/su11010264
    [12] Rezaei M, Liu B (2017) Food loss and waste in the food supply chain. International Nut and Dried Fruit Council 26–27.
    [13] Vilarino MV, Franco C, Quarrington C (2017) Food loss and waste reduction as an integral part of a circular economy. Front Environ Sci 5: 21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2017.00021 doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00021
    [14] FAO (2011) Global food losses and food waste: Extent, causes and preventions. Available from: https://www.fao.org/3/mb060e/mb060e00.htm.
    [15] Scherhaufer S, Moates G, Hartikainen H, et al. (2018) Environmental impacts of food waste in Europe. Waste Manage 77: 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.038 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.038
    [16] Brancoli P, Rousta K, Bolton K (2017) Life cycle assessment of supermarket food waste. Resour Conserv Recy 118: 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.024 doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.024
    [17] USDA (2022) Food waste and its links to greenhouse gases and climate change. Available from: https://www.usda.gov/media/blog/2022/01/24/food-waste-and-its-links-greenhouse-gases-and-climate-change.
    [18] San-Epifanio LE, De Renobales Scheifler M (2015) Envisioning a future without food waste and food poverty: Societal challenges. Wageningen Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-820-9
    [19] Galli A, Wiedmann T, Ercin E, et al. (2012). Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a "footprint family" of indicators: definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. Ecol Indic 16: 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.017 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.017
    [20] Hoekstra AY, Mekonnen MM (2012) The water footprint of humanity. PNAS 109: 3232–3237. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109936109 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109936109
    [21] Steen-Olsen K, Weinzettel J, Cranston G, et al. (2012) Carbon, land, and water footprint accounts for the European Union: Consumption, production, and displacements through international trade. Environ Sci Technol 46: 10883–10891. https://doi.org/10.1021/es301949t doi: 10.1021/es301949t
    [22] Jones CM, Kammen DM (2011) Quantifying carbon footprint reduction opportunities for U.S. households and communities. Environ Sci Technol 45: 4088–4095. https://doi.org/10.1021/es102221h doi: 10.1021/es102221h
    [23] Ridoutt BG, Pfister S (2010). Reducing humanity's water footprint. Environ Sci Technol 44: 6019–6021. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101907z doi: 10.1021/es101907z
    [24] Audsley E, Brander M, Chatterton JC, et al. (2010) How low can we go? An assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from the UK food system and the scope reduction by 2050. Report for the WWF and Food Climate Research Network. Available from: https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/6503.
    [25] Leip A, Billen G, Garnier J, et al. (2015). Impacts of European livestock production: Nitrogen, sulphur, phosphorus and greenhouse gas emissions, land-use, water eutrophication and biodiversity. Environ Res Let 10: 115004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/115004 doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/115004
    [26] Lesschen JP, van den Berg M, Westhoek HJ, et al. (2011) Greenhouse gas emission profiles of European livestock sectors. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166–167: 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.058 doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.058
    [27] Gaiani S, Caldeira S, Adorno V, et al. (2018). Food wasters: Profiling consumers' attitude to waste food in Italy. Waste Manage 72: 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.012 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.012
    [28] Visschers VHM, Wickli N, Siegrist M (2016) Sorting out food waste behaviour: A survey on the motivators and barriers of self-reported amounts of food waste in households. J Environ Psychol 45: 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.007 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.007
    [29] Ogunmoroti A, Liu M, Li MY, et al. (2022) Unraveling the environmental impact of current and future food waste and its management in Chinese provinces. Res Environ Sustainability 9: 100064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2022.100064 doi: 10.1016/j.resenv.2022.100064
    [30] Xue L, Liu G (2019) Introduction to global food losses and food waste, In: Saving Food: Production, supply chain, food waste, and food consumption, London: Elsevier Academic Press, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-815357-4.00001-8
    [31] United Nation, Department of economic and social affairs, sustainable development (2022) Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
    [32] Kummu M, de Moel H, Porkka M, et al. (2012) Lost food, wasted resources: Global food supply chain losses and their impacts on freshwater, cropland, and fertiliser use. Sci Total Environ 438: 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.092 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.092
    [33] FAO (2022) Sustainable development goals. Available from: https://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals/indicators/1231/en/.
    [34] Kafa N, Jaegler A (2021) Food losses and waste quantification in supply chains: A systematic literature review. British Food J 123: 3502–3521. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2020-0879 doi: 10.1108/BFJ-09-2020-0879
    [35] de Oliveira MM, Lago A, Dal' Magro GP (2021) Food loss and waste in the context of the circular economy: a systematic review. J Clean Prod 294: 126284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126284 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126284
    [36] FAO (2019) Understanding the issue before taking action—Food loss and waste: what's the difference? Available from: https://www.fao.org/state-of-food-agriculture/2019/en/.
    [37] Buzby JC, Wells FH, Hyman J (2014) The estimated amount, value, and calories of postharvest food losses at the retail and consumer levels in the United States. USDA. Available from: https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=43836https: //www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid = 43836.
    [38] Chang HH (2021) Is it unethical to waste food? Exploring consumer's ethical perspectives and waste intentions. Curr Psychol 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01257-3 doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-01257-3
    [39] Lebersorger S, Schneider F (2011) Discussion on the methodology for determining food waste in household waste composition studies. Waste Manage 31: 1924–1933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.05.023 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.05.023
    [40] Parizeau K, Von Massow M, Martin R (2015) Household-level dynamics of food waste production and related beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours in Guelph, Ontario. Waste Manage 35: 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.019 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.019
    [41] Williams H, Wikström F, Otterbring T, et al. (2012) Reasons for household food waste with special attention to packaging. J Clean Prod 24: 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.044 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.044
    [42] Graham-Rowe E, Jessop DC, Sparks P (2019) Self-affirmation theory and pro-environmental behaviour: Promoting a reduction in household food waste. J Environ Psychol 62: 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.02.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.02.003
    [43] Stefan V, van Herpen E, Tudoran AA, et al. (2013) Avoiding food waste by Romanian consumers: The importance of planning and shopping routines. Food Qual Prefer 28: 375–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.11.001 doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.11.001
    [44] Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1994) Population increase causes increased environmental damage, In: Environmental ethics: Reading in theory and application, Boston, London: Jones and Barlett Publishers.
    [45] Sanne C (2002) Willing consumers—or locked-in? Policies for sustainable consumption. Ecol Econ 42: 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00086-1 doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00086-1
    [46] Røpke I (1999) The dynamics of willingness to consume. Ecol Econ 28: 399–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00107-4 doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00107-4
    [47] Vieira VA (2008) Consumer behavior and managerial decision making. RAC 12: 253–255.
    [48] Fischer ARH (2015) Consumer behavior and food science, In: Reference module in food science, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.03335-7
    [49] Ananda J, Karunasena GG, Mitsis A, et al. (2021) Analysing behavioural and socio-demographic factors and practices influencing Australian household food waste. J Clean Prod 306: 127280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127280 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127280
    [50] Gatley A, Caraher M, Lang T (2014) A qualitative, cross cultural examination of attitudes and behaviour in relation to cooking habits in France and Britain. Appetite 75: 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.12.014 doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.12.014
    [51] Bloom J (2010) American wasteland: How America throws away nearly half of its food (and what we can do about it), Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.
    [52] Menzel P, D'aluisio F (2008) What the world eats, Berkeley, California: Tricycle Press.
    [53] Di Talia E, Simeone M, Scarpato D (2019) Consumer behaviour types in household food waste. J Clean Prod 214: 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.216 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.216
    [54] Mou J, Benyoucef M (2021) Consumer behavior in social commerce: Results from a meta-analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Change 167: 120734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120734 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120734
    [55] Yadav PG, Rai J (2017) The generation Z and their social media usage: A review and a research outline. Glob J Enterprise Inform Syst 9: 110–116. https://doi.org/10.18311/gjeis/2017/15748 doi: 10.18311/gjeis/2017/15748
    [56] Hazuchová N, Antošová I, Stávková J (2020) Food wastage as a display of consumer behaviour. J Competitiveness 12: 51–66. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2020.02.04 doi: 10.7441/joc.2020.02.04
    [57] Jungowska J, Kulczyński B, Sidor A, et al. (2021) Assessment of factors affecting the amount of food waste in households run by Polish women aware of well-being. Sustainability 13: 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020976 doi: 10.3390/su13020976
    [58] Farr-Wharton G, Foth M, Choi J (2014) Identifying factors that promote consumer behaviours causing expired domestic food waste. J Consum Behav 13: 393–402.
    [59] Eurostat (2021) EU statistics on income and living conditions microdata 2004–2019, release 1 in 2021, Available from: https://doi.org/10.2907/EUSILC2004-2019V.2.
    [60] Eurostat (2021) Mean consumption expenditure by type of household. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/hbs_exp_t134/default/table?lang=en.
    [61] Setti M, Falasconi L, Segrè A, et al. (2016) Italian consumers' income and food waste behavior. British Food J 118: 1731–1746. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-11-2015-0427 doi: 10.1108/BFJ-11-2015-0427
    [62] Ghinea C, Ghiuta OA (2019) Household food waste generation: young consumers behaviour, habits and attitudes. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16: 2185–2200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1853-1 doi: 10.1007/s13762-018-1853-1
    [63] Pellegrini G, Sillani S, Gregori M. et al. (2019) Household food waste reduction: Italian consumers' analysis for improving food management. British Food J 121: 1382–1397. https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-07-2018-0425 doi: 10.1108/bfj-07-2018-0425
    [64] Rohm H, Oostindjer M, Aschemann-Witzel J, et al. (2017) Consumers in a sustainable food supply chain (COSUS): Understanding consumer behavior to encourage food waste reduction. Foods 6: 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods6120104 doi: 10.3390/foods6120104
    [65] Bogevska Z, Berjan S, El Bilali H, et al. (2021). Exploring food shopping, consumption and waste habits in North Macedonia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 82: 101150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101150 doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101150
    [66] Tomaszewska M, Bilska B, Kołożyn-Krajewska D (2022) The influence of selected food safety practices of consumers on food waste due to its spoilage. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19: 8144. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138144 doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138144
    [67] Silvennoinen K, Katajajuuri JM, Hartikainen H, et al. (2014) Food waste volume and composition in Finnish households. British Food J 116: 1058–1068. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2012-0311 doi: 10.1108/BFJ-12-2012-0311
    [68] Aschemann-Witzel J, De Hooge I, Amani P, et al. (2015). Consumer-related food waste: Causes and potential for action. Sustainability 7: 6457–6477. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7066457 doi: 10.3390/su7066457
    [69] Samotyja U (2022) Consumer understanding of the 'best before' and 'use by' dates. SJ GMU 122: 82–92. https://doi.org/10.26408/122.07 doi: 10.26408/122.07
    [70] Van Boxstael S, Devlieghere F, Berkvens D, et al. (2014) Understanding and attitude regarding the shelf life labels and dates on pre-packed food products by Belgian consumers. Food Control 37: 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.08.043 doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.08.043
    [71] Leib EB, Rice C, Neff R, et al. (2016) Consumer perceptions of date labels: National survey. Center for Health Law & Policy Innovation. Available from: https://chlpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Consumer-Perceptions-on-Date-Labels_May-2016.pdf.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Asmaa Mahana, Hala M. Hammoda, Fathalla M. Harraz, Eman Shawky, Metabolomics combined to chemometrics reveals the putative α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitory metabolites of ground cherry (Physalis pruinosa L.), 2022, 161, 09639969, 111903, 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111903
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2657) PDF downloads(152) Cited by(2)

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(9)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog