
It is widely accepted that physical exercise can be used as a tool for the prevention and treatment of various diseases or disorders. In addition, in the recent years, exercise has also been successfully used to enhance people's cognition. There is a large amount of research that has supported the benefits of physical exercise on human cognition, both in children and adults. Among these studies, some have focused on the acute or transitory effects of exercise on cognition, while others have focused on the effects of regular physical exercise. However, the relation between exercise and cognition is complex and we still have limited knowledge about the moderators and mechanisms underlying this relation. Most of human studies have focused on the behavioral aspects of exercise-effects on cognition, while animal studies have deepened in its possible neuro-physiological mechanisms. Even so, thanks to advances in neuroimaging techniques, there is a growing body of evidence that provides valuable information regarding these mechanisms in the human population. This review aims to analyze the effects of regular and acute aerobic exercise on cognition. The exercise-cognition relationship will be reviewed both from the behavioral perspective and from the neurophysiological mechanisms. The effects of exercise on animals, adult humans, and infant humans will be analyzed separately. Finally, physical exercise intervention programs aiming to increase cognitive performance in scholar and workplace environments will be reviewed.
Citation: Blai Ferrer-Uris, Maria Angeles Ramos, Albert Busquets, Rosa Angulo-Barroso. Can exercise shape your brain? A review of aerobic exercise effects on cognitive function and neuro-physiological underpinning mechanisms[J]. AIMS Neuroscience, 2022, 9(2): 150-174. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2022009
[1] | Jia Li, Zhipeng Tong . Local Hölder continuity of inverse variation-inequality problem constructed by non-Newtonian polytropic operators in finance. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 28753-28765. doi: 10.3934/math.20231472 |
[2] | Jia Li, Changchun Bi . Existence and blowup of solutions for non-divergence polytropic variation-inequality in corn option trading. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 16748-16756. doi: 10.3934/math.2023856 |
[3] | Zongqi Sun . Regularity and higher integrability of weak solutions to a class of non-Newtonian variation-inequality problems arising from American lookback options. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 14633-14643. doi: 10.3934/math.2023749 |
[4] | Zhi Guang Li . Global regularity and blowup for a class of non-Newtonian polytropic variation-inequality problem from investment-consumption problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18174-18184. doi: 10.3934/math.2023923 |
[5] | Qingjun Zhao . The L∞ estimate of the spatial gradient of the solution to a variational inequality problem originates from the financial contract problem with advanced implementation clauses. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 35949-35963. doi: 10.3934/math.20241704 |
[6] | Tao Wu . Some results for a variation-inequality problem with fourth order p(x)-Kirchhoff operator arising from options on fresh agricultural products. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 6749-6762. doi: 10.3934/math.2023343 |
[7] | Zengtai Gong, Chengcheng Shen . Monotone set-valued measures: Choquet integral, f-divergence and Radon-Nikodym derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10892-10916. doi: 10.3934/math.2022609 |
[8] | Yuejiao Feng . Regularity of weak solutions to a class of fourth order parabolic variational inequality problems arising from swap option pricing. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 13889-13897. doi: 10.3934/math.2023710 |
[9] | Sarah Elahi, Muhammad Aslam Noor . Integral inequalities for hyperbolic type preinvex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 10313-10326. doi: 10.3934/math.2021597 |
[10] | Feliz Minhós, Nuno Oliveira . On periodic Ambrosetti-Prodi-type problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 12986-12999. doi: 10.3934/math.2023654 |
It is widely accepted that physical exercise can be used as a tool for the prevention and treatment of various diseases or disorders. In addition, in the recent years, exercise has also been successfully used to enhance people's cognition. There is a large amount of research that has supported the benefits of physical exercise on human cognition, both in children and adults. Among these studies, some have focused on the acute or transitory effects of exercise on cognition, while others have focused on the effects of regular physical exercise. However, the relation between exercise and cognition is complex and we still have limited knowledge about the moderators and mechanisms underlying this relation. Most of human studies have focused on the behavioral aspects of exercise-effects on cognition, while animal studies have deepened in its possible neuro-physiological mechanisms. Even so, thanks to advances in neuroimaging techniques, there is a growing body of evidence that provides valuable information regarding these mechanisms in the human population. This review aims to analyze the effects of regular and acute aerobic exercise on cognition. The exercise-cognition relationship will be reviewed both from the behavioral perspective and from the neurophysiological mechanisms. The effects of exercise on animals, adult humans, and infant humans will be analyzed separately. Finally, physical exercise intervention programs aiming to increase cognitive performance in scholar and workplace environments will be reviewed.
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder;
brain-derived neurotrophic factor;
insulin-like growth factor 1
HRV analysis is widely used for cardiovascular health monitoring and disease prediction [1,2]. It is also considered an important indicator to evaluate the control of cardiac autonomic nervous balance [3,4], which is related to physical activity [2], mental stress [1] and sleep health [5,6]. The crux of HRV analysis involves studying the fluctuations in time intervals between successive heartbeats, known as inter-beat intervals. Typically, the inter-beat interval is gauged as the time between two consecutive R-peak (R-R interval or RRi) ECG signals. Given that the precision of HRV analysis is contingent on accurately pinpointing R-peaks within the ECG signal, the development of a high-precision R-peak localization algorithm is of paramount significance.
For over four decades, the field of automated R-peak detection has undergone extensive exploration. Numerous algorithms targeting R-peak or QRS detection have been made available to the public [7,8], leveraging diverse principles like template matching [9,10,11], derivative analysis [12,13], digital filtering [14,15,16], wavelet transform [17,18], Hilbert transform [19,20], morphology classification [21], phase space reconstruction [22] and dynamic thresholding [23,24,25,26,27]. Despite these advancements, formulating a robust and universally accepted algorithm remains a challenge, given the diverse morphological differenes present in ECG signals [28]. The incorporation of machine learning, particularly deep neural networks [29,30,31], has significantly enhanced the sensitivity of R-peak or QRS detection, surpassing the 99.9% mark. However, the crux of the matter is that, instead of accurately pinpointing the chronological localization of R-peaks, current algorithms primarily emphasize sensitivity and overall accuracy in detecting R-peaks, accommodating a certain temporal discrepancy between actual and detected R-peaks [32].
This study centers on developing an algorithm to accurately identify the exact positions of R-peaks within ECG signals. This is achieved by enhancing an existing R-peak detection method. Among the available algorithms, we initiated our work by adapting the PT algorithm [33], which remains widely employed due to its robustness, efficiency and accuracy in R-peak detection [34]. The PT algorithm utilizes a moving-window-integration of 150 ms, a step that can occasionally lead to a random shift in the detected R-peak location. To address the lack of precision in R-peak localization, in particular from noisy or low-quality ECG data, we propose to first roughly localize the QRS complex through the computation and identification of the QRS envelope, and then refine the localization with a template matching method.
The assessment of the proposed technique was carried out using the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia database [35], available through PhysioNet [36]. The database contained 48 thirty-minute records with a sample rate of 360 Hz, which were captured from a group of patients with 22 females and 25 males aged between 23 and 89 years. Notably, some of these records exhibited noticeable morphological distortions, particularly evident in the P and T waves of the ECG signal. Expert cardiologists annotated the database as a point of reference. Each record contained 2 leads, and lead I was used to evaluate the proposed algorithm.
According to the Special Requirements for the Safety and Basic Performance of Dynamic ECG Systems from international standard IEC60601-2-47:2001, it is considered that the R-peak position is correctly detected by an algorithm if the R-peak position obtained by the algorithm is within 150 ms of the annotated position. The proposed algorithm is evaluated in terms of both the sensitivity of R-peak detection and the accuracy of the detected R-peak location. Sensitivity (Se), positive prediction value (PPV) and detection error rate (DER) are calculated by Eq (1) for the evaluation of R-peak detection [32]:
Se=TPTP+FN×100%;PPV=TPTP+FP×100%;DER=FN+FPTP+FN×100% | (1) |
where TP (true positive) refers to the number of correctly detected R-peaks, FN (false negative) refers to the number of undetected R-peaks which exist in annotation and FP (false positive) refers to the number of falsely detected R-peaks which do not exist in annotation (i.e., > 150 ms away from any annotated R-peaks).
The accuracy of the detected R-peak location is evaluated by the annotated-detected error (ADE) with unit ms calculated by Eq (2) [32]:
ADE=√1TPTP∑n=1(Kn−Dn)2∗Ts | (2) |
where Kn refers to the annotated R-peak location, Dn refers to the detected R-peak location and Ts refers to ECG signal sampling period with unit ms.
The R-peak position detected by the algorithm may have a group time delay with the annotated R-peak position. The final R-peak position group time delay needs to be compensated once for best alignment between the detected R-peaks and the annotated R-peaks with a fixed shift of several samples in each record. The group time delay is related to the filtering operation and also to the spectral characteristics of the QRS complex. Group time delay compensation is only used for fair comparison between different algorithms and has no effect on RRi calculation. Group time delay TD with unit ms can be simply calculated by Eq (3):
TD=[1TPTP∑n=1(Kn−Dn)]∗Ts | (3) |
The PT algorithm consists of 5 processes: band-pass filter (BPF), derivative, squaring, moving window integration (MWI) and R-peak detection [33], as shown in Figure 1.
The 5–15 Hz BPF was achieved by cascading a 15 Hz low-pass filter (LPF) cascaded with a 5 Hz high-pass filter (HPF). LPF was used to remove the high-frequency noise such as electromyogram (EMG) and power line interference [34]. HPF was used to remove the low-frequency interference, such as the baseline wander. Taking the derivative would enhance the slope information of the QRS complex and suppress the low-frequency P-wave and T-waves [34]. The squaring process was applied so that the positive and negative values were not canceled out in the following MWI process, and the QRS complex were further enhanced. The MWI process was performed with a 150 ms integration window to acquire the envelope of the R-wave. The 150-ms window width is used since it is slightly larger than that of a normal QRS complex for better adaptivity. We chose a third-party PT algorithm from NeuroKit [37] as a reference for performance evaluation. The source code is publicly available in Python on www.github.com.
In the PT algorithm, the MWI process may result in an R-peak location shift because the maximum slope position of the rising edge of the integration waveform was not the precise R-peak temporal location [33]. The precise R-peak is on the point of minimum slope position of the rising edge of integration waveform in theory, which will be illustrated in discussion section. In addition, the 5–15 Hz BPF may result in distortion of QRS complex which will also be illustrated in the discussion section. These processes could result in temporal shifts of R-peaks from their real positions and need to be further improved for more precise localization of R-peaks.
The proposed algorithm includes three stages (Figure 2). The first is the preprocessing stage, where the raw ECG signal is filtered by a 5–35 Hz BPF, which is achieved by a 35 Hz LPF cascaded with a 5 Hz HPF. The second stage calculates a window that marks the QRS complex, including 3 processes: squaring, 5 Hz LPF and windowing. The third stage is the template matching stage, in which a program auto-selected QRS template is taken to localize the R-peak by finding the maximum moving-window cross-correlation (CC) with the windowed pre-processed ECG signal.
The windowing stage is inspired from the PT algorithm. A 5–35 Hz pass band is used here instead of the 5–15 Hz pass band for better performance and adaptability. The derivative process can highlight the slope characteristic of the QRS complex, but can also induce a phase shift, so it is not used in our algorithm. The MWI process is replaced by a forward-backward digital 5 Hz LPF for better noise filtering and zero-time delay. After the windowing transformation of L(i), windows with 200-ms width are generated in accordance with the center of the QRS envelopes.
The template matching stage is an improvement for precise R-peak position detection. The QRS template is generated by automatic selection among the first five QRS windows from each ECG recording Y(i). Among the first five QRS complexes inside the window, the one with the median R-peak amplitude (absolute value) is selected. A 120 ms segment from the selected ECG waveform symmetrical about the R-peak position is taken as the template. One hundred twenty ms is determined because the width of 120 ms is the maximum width of normal QRS complexes [38]. The QRS template has a window width of N = 43 samples with a 360 Hz sampling rate, where N must be an odd number to ensure that the R-peak position is centered.
The proposed method was implemented on Python 3.9 software and evaluated over the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia database to compare with the state-of-the-art PT algorithm.
The filters used in the algorithm are all second-order forward-backward Butterworth infinite impulse response (IIR) filters with zero-phase delay. The forward-backward filtering processes are implemented as Eq (4) to Eq (6):
Z(i)=b0⋅X(i)+b1⋅X(i−1)+b2⋅X(i−2)−c1⋅Z(i−1)−c2⋅Z(i−2) | (4) |
Z(i)=Z(−i) | (5) |
Y(i)=b0⋅Z(i)+b1⋅Z(i−1)+b2⋅Z(i−2)−c1⋅Y(i−1)−c2⋅Y(i−2) | (6) |
where X(i) is the original ECG data, Y(i) is the filtered signal and b0, b1, b2, c1, c2 are filter parameters. Equations (4) and (6) are difference equations of the IIR filter. Equation (5) is included to reverse Z(i) and pass it through the IIR filter again for zero-phase delay.
Here, the 5–35 Hz BPF process is achieved by a 35 Hz LPF cascaded with a 5 Hz HPF. All filters are implemented with SciPy.signal.sosfiltfilt function available in Python. The first 4 s segment from record 209 was used to display the results of this stage, as shown in Figure 3.
This stage calculates a window to mark the QRS complex in each ECG beat. First, the Y(i) signal is squared to obtain S(i) according to Eq (7), which enhances the QRS complex:
S(i)=Y(i)2 | (7) |
Second, S(i) passes through a 5 Hz low-pass filter to obtain L(i) as the envelope of the QRS complex. Third, L(i) is converted into the window signal W(i) through dynamic thresholding. W(i) is composed of "0" and "1", where "1" indicates the interval of QRS window. The conversion logic is shown as Eqs (8) and (9):
D(n)=M(n)+D(n−1)∗(n−1)n | (8) |
W(i)={1,L(i)>max(0.3∗M(n)+0.1∗D(n),0.05∗A(n))0,L(i)≤max(0.3∗M(n)+0.1∗D(n),0.05∗A(n)) | (9) |
where M(n) is the maximum value of the n-th 400 ms window, D(n) is the average of all past maximum value of windows and A(n) is the maximum value of the 2 s segment of the signal (five consecutive 400 ms windows). W(i) is set to "1" or "0" according to Eq (9). The window threshold D(n) is dynamically updated every 400 ms according to Eq (8) and A(n) is updated every 400 ms with the forward-moving 2 s segment. We also verified the performance of different window widths, such as 200,300,400 and 500 ms, in which the 400 ms window had the best result.
The 400 ms window segmentation would cause some QRS complexes to be split, resulting in duplicate windows. Hence, W(i) was further processed to remove small windows resulting from window segmentation. Small-width windows, whose width were less than 1/4 of the average window width, were removed. And, the window with the smaller width was removed when there was another window within 0.4 s. Finally, the windows were symmetrically widened to 200 ms (72 samples for 360 Hz sample rate) about the center position. The windows whose width were greater than 200 ms remained unchanged. Figure 4 shows the first 4 s segment from record 209 as an example.
The QRS template is an N-sample time series T(n) extracted from Y(i). The CC is calculated by Eq (10):
C(i)=∑jn=−j(T(n)−¯T)(Y(i+n)−¯Y)√∑jn=−j(T(n)−¯T)2∑jn=−j(Y(i+n)−¯Y)2 | (10) |
where the parameter j=(N−1)/2 is half the QRS window width. C(i) is the CC result of moving window correlation between QRS template T(n) and Y(i).
The R-peak location (R(k) where k is the index of R-peaks number) is determined by finding the largest CC (Cp(k)). Figure 5 shows the first 4 s segment from record 209 as an example. R(k) and Cp(k) were further processed to reduce false detection of R-peaks. When the RRi is less than 0.4 times the average RRi, remove the corresponding R-peak with the smaller Cp value. The Cp(k) is used to select the R-peak because it shows the similarity of QRS complexes with the QRS template and may be used as an indicator for the reliability of R-peak detection. The final complete Cp(k) of record 209 was showed in Figure 6.
ECG signals are highly susceptible to external interference and noise, which often leads to distortions in the ECG waveform. This introduces significant challenges in detecting R-peaks accurately. Most QRS detection algorithms are structured around three essential steps: denoising, R-peak enhancement and R-peak detection [39]. The algorithm proposed in this paper aligns with this strategy as well. The initial preprocessing stage serves the purpose of noise reduction, followed by the application of windowing to enhance R-peaks. Ultimately, the template matching stage is used for R-peak detection. The 5–35 Hz band-pass filter effectively captures the spectrum energy of the QRS complex while preserving the essential morphology of QRS and simultaneously attenuating interference and noise. Employing the template matching technique stands out as a potent method for precisely identifying the exact positions of R-peaks.
The performances of the proposed algorithm on the Arrhythmia database are shown in Appendix Table A1. TB represents the total number of R-peaks annotated in the record. DB represents the total number of detected R-peaks. TD is the group time delay between TB and DB with an integer number of samples. DB is 109491, only 3 less than TB of 109494. Average TD is only 0.17 ms (0.0625 sample). The maximum FP value was 139 and the maximum FN value is 43. In general, the number of false detections (FP = 242) was slightly less than the number of missed detections (FN = 245).
The performances of the PT algorithm on the Arrhythmia database were shown in Appendix Table A2. The maximum FP value was 591 and the maximum FN value was 482, appearing in the same record, 108. In general, the number of false detections (FP = 934) was less than the number of missed detections (FN = 1233). The average TD of the PT algorithm was 30.49 ms (10.975 samples), much larger than that of the proposed algorithm, which was 0.17 ms on average.
Performance comparison between the two algorithms was also evaluated with different tolerance for R-peak detection, as shown in Table 1, in which: 150 ms was the time of 54 sample periods, 25 ms was the time of 9 sample periods, 2.78 ms was the time of 1 sample period. The proposed algorithm outperformed the PT algorithm on all metrics.
Pan-Tompkins Algorithm | Proposed Algorithm | |||||||
Tolerance | Se(%) | PPV(%) | DER(%) | ADE(ms) | Se(%) | PPV(%) | DER(%) | ADE(ms) |
150 ms | 98.87 | 99.14 | 1.98 | 21.65 | 99.78 | 99.78 | 0.44 | 8.35 |
25 ms | 79.41 | 79.63 | 40.90 | 13.37 | 96.82 | 96.82 | 6.36 | 3.17 |
2.78 ms | 11.85 | 11.88 | 176.03 | 2.42 | 86.18 | 86.18 | 27.64 | 1.86 |
Note: TB: total beats annotated; Se: sensitivity; PPV: positive prediction value; DER: detection error rate; ADE: annotated-detected error. |
The main purpose of this algorithm is to improve the detection accuracy of R-peak location, paying less attention to Se/PPV/DER metrics. Yet, the algorithm derives satisfying performance in the Se/PPV/DER metrics on the Arrhythmia database. Additionally, the proposed algorithm completely surpassed the comparison algorithm in the accuracy of R-peak location [32]. Refer to Table 2 for details.
Method | TB | Se(%) | PPV(%) | DER(%) | ADE(ms) |
Proposed | 109,494 | 99.78 | 99.78 | 0.44 | 8.35 |
Kai Zhao et al. [32] | 109,966 | 99.81 | 99.88 | 0.31 | 12.2 |
* Pan and Tompkins [33] | 109,966 | 99.13 | 99.63 | 1.24 | 13.4 |
* Indicates that the data is quoted from literature [32]. |
The introduced algorithm showcased superior performance over the PT algorithm across all metrics including SE, PPV, DER and ADE when tested on the Arrhythmia database. Notably, the achieved ADE of 8.35 ms surpassed the 12.2 ms reported in a comparative study [32]. To optimize the integrity of QRS morphology, a 5–35 Hz BPF was employed in the proposed algorithm. Furthermore, the template matching method was proved an effective strategy to identify the precise location of R-peaks.
The Arrhythmia database is widely used to evaluate the QRS detection algorithm, because it includes various arrhythmic QRS complexes, different types of noise and various QRS morphology with detailed annotation. However, the Arrhythmia database still has the problem of inaccurate R-peak annotation [40]. A large number of literatures with nearly perfect performance also have a problem with non-standardized R-peak numbers. There are various different values for the total number of R-peaks suggested for this database, such as 109,494 [10], 109,966 [27], 106,581 [41], 109,475 [42]. The Arrhythmia database have many categories of annotation: "*", "N", "L", "R", "a", "V", "F", "J", "A", "S", " "E", "j", "/", "Q", "e", "n", "f". This paper used 109,494 as the total R-peak number, and the categories excluded in the statistics were: "*", "n". The poor performance in ADE may result from not only the error of R-peak position detected, but also the error of R-peak position annotated. As shown in Figure 7, there are annotation errors in record 104, obviously, which results in detection error in both algorithms, although more in the PT algorithm.
We extracted record 122 and record 115 from the best ADE of the Arrhythmia database, and compared them with record 104 and record 208 from the worst ADE as shown in Table 3. Record 122 and record 115 only have normal beats. While the proportion of the number of "V" categories in TB (total number of R-peaks) is obviously larger in record 208 and record 104, which may be a reason for the poor ADE performance. "V" refers to the category of premature ventricular contract, "/" refers to the paced beat, 'f ' refers to fusion of paced and normal beat. Those kinds of QRS morphology differ from normal QRS morphology (and therefore the QRS template), which could result in degraded performance in template matching. These categories have different QRS templates which are not covered in the proposed method. But, the method still has the ability to detect R-peaks in a wrong position with a lower cross-correlation peak value, which induce detected R-peak shift from the real location and reduce the ADE performance.
File | ADE(ms) | TB | N | V | / | Q | F | f | S |
122 | 1.12 | 2476 | 2476 | ||||||
115 | 1.19 | 1953 | 1953 | ||||||
104 | 16.75 | 2229 | 163 | 2 | 1380 | 18 | 1 | 666 | |
208 | 24.96 | 2955 | 1586 | 992 | 2 | 373 | 2 | ||
Note: normal beats; V: beats of premature ventricular contract; /: paced beats; f: fusion of paced and normal beats; Q: Unclassifiable beats; F: fusion of ventricular and normal beats; S: supraventricular premature beats. |
There is another reason for false R-peak detection in the PT algorithm. The narrow-band BPF would distort the QRS morphology, causing the wrong R-peak position to be detected. Examples are shown in Figure 8. Comparing Figure 8(a), (c), 5–15 Hz BPF could shift the R-peak location forward about 22 samples while R-peak location nearly has no shift with 5–35 Hz BPF. And, the MWI process is another possible reason for R-peak location shift. In Figure 8(b), the blue line is the real R-peak location in raw ECG data, while the red line is the final detected R-peak by the PT algorithm with a shift of 26 samples. In Figure 8(d), the blue line is the real R-peak location in raw ECG data, while the red line is the final detected R-peak by the PT algorithm with a shift of 11 samples. The MWI process will result in a time delay of Trs (R-wave peak to S-wave offset) for R-peak position [33], where Trs is related with the QRS morphology and varies with noise.
This paper presents an enhanced version of the PT algorithm, wherein the inclusion of the QRS template matching substantially enhances the accuracy of R-peak position detection. This advancement is particularly effective in refining the precision of R-peak localization. Moving forward, the potential exists to expand the algorithm's versatility by incorporating various templates for atypical QRS patterns, thereby bolstering its adaptability. The contribution of this study lies in the introduction of a highly precise R-peak position detection algorithm capable of accurately pinpointing R-peak locations. This advancement holds the promise of significantly amplifying the clinical applications of HRV analysis.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
The authors wish to acknowledge the funding support from Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (No. 2019050001), Program for Chang Jiang Scholars and Innovative Research Teams in Universities (No. IRT_17R40), Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Optical Information Materials and Technology (No. 2017B030301007), Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Electronic Paper Displays Materials and Devices (201705030007), MOE International Laboratory for Optical Information Technologies, the 111 Project.
The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.
File | TD(ms) | TB | DB | TP | FP | FN | Se(%) | PPV(%) | DER(%) | ADE(ms) |
100 | 0.00 | 2273 | 2273 | 2273 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 2.21 |
101 | 0.00 | 1865 | 1865 | 1862 | 3 | 3 | 99.84 | 99.84 | 0.00 | 2.53 |
102 | 0.00 | 2187 | 2187 | 2187 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 10.80 |
103 | 0.00 | 2084 | 2083 | 2083 | 0 | 1 | 99.95 | 100 | 0.00 | 2.32 |
104 | 0.00 | 2229 | 2237 | 2228 | 9 | 1 | 99.96 | 99.60 | 0.00 | 16.75 |
105 | 0.00 | 2572 | 2590 | 2557 | 33 | 15 | 99.42 | 98.73 | 0.02 | 9.54 |
106 | 0.00 | 2027 | 2021 | 2020 | 1 | 7 | 99.65 | 99.95 | 0.00 | 5.30 |
107 | –2.78 | 2137 | 2136 | 2135 | 1 | 2 | 99.91 | 99.95 | 0.00 | 7.47 |
108 | 2.78 | 1763 | 1758 | 1754 | 4 | 9 | 99.49 | 99.77 | 0.01 | 14.95 |
109 | –2.78 | 2532 | 2530 | 2530 | 0 | 2 | 99.92 | 100 | 0.00 | 5.08 |
111 | 0.00 | 2124 | 2123 | 2123 | 0 | 1 | 99.95 | 100 | 0.00 | 5.78 |
112 | 0.00 | 2539 | 2539 | 2539 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 2.14 |
113 | 0.00 | 1795 | 1795 | 1795 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.93 |
114 | 30.56 | 1879 | 1880 | 1876 | 4 | 3 | 99.84 | 99.79 | 0.00 | 8.02 |
115 | 2.78 | 1953 | 1953 | 1953 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.12 |
116 | 0.00 | 2412 | 2390 | 2387 | 3 | 25 | 98.96 | 99.87 | 0.01 | 2.91 |
117 | –19.44 | 1535 | 1535 | 1535 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 6.97 |
118 | 0.00 | 2278 | 2278 | 2278 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 3.15 |
119 | 0.00 | 1987 | 1988 | 1987 | 1 | 0 | 100 | 99.95 | 0.00 | 6.00 |
121 | –2.78 | 1863 | 1861 | 1861 | 0 | 2 | 99.89 | 100 | 0.00 | 2.26 |
122 | 0.00 | 2476 | 2476 | 2476 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.19 |
123 | 0.00 | 1518 | 1518 | 1518 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.82 |
124 | 0.00 | 1619 | 1619 | 1619 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 6.99 |
200 | –5.56 | 2601 | 2601 | 2599 | 2 | 2 | 99.92 | 99.92 | 0.00 | 17.64 |
201 | 0.00 | 1963 | 1942 | 1942 | 0 | 21 | 98.93 | 100 | 0.01 | 4.15 |
202 | 0.00 | 2136 | 2122 | 2122 | 0 | 14 | 99.34 | 100 | 0.01 | 2.47 |
203 | –5.56 | 2980 | 2954 | 2937 | 17 | 43 | 98.56 | 99.42 | 0.02 | 15.28 |
205 | 0.00 | 2656 | 2648 | 2648 | 0 | 8 | 99.70 | 100 | 0.00 | 5.27 |
207 | 0.00 | 1860 | 1991 | 1852 | 139 | 8 | 99.57 | 93.02 | 0.08 | 12.98 |
208 | 8.33 | 2955 | 2939 | 2936 | 3 | 19 | 99.36 | 99.90 | 0.01 | 24.96 |
209 | 0.00 | 3005 | 3005 | 3005 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.54 |
210 | 0.00 | 2650 | 2623 | 2621 | 2 | 29 | 98.91 | 99.92 | 0.01 | 7.34 |
212 | 0.00 | 2748 | 2748 | 2748 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 2.24 |
213 | 0.00 | 3251 | 3248 | 3248 | 0 | 3 | 99.91 | 100 | 0.00 | 5.78 |
214 | 0.00 | 2262 | 2258 | 2258 | 0 | 4 | 99.82 | 100 | 0.00 | 4.60 |
215 | 0.00 | 3363 | 3359 | 3359 | 0 | 4 | 99.88 | 100 | 0.00 | 3.18 |
217 | –13.89 | 2208 | 2205 | 2204 | 1 | 4 | 99.82 | 99.95 | 0.00 | 8.09 |
219 | 0.00 | 2154 | 2154 | 2154 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.46 |
220 | 2.78 | 2048 | 2048 | 2048 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.82 |
221 | 0.00 | 2427 | 2425 | 2425 | 0 | 2 | 99.92 | 100 | 0.00 | 2.65 |
222 | 0.00 | 2483 | 2485 | 2483 | 2 | 0 | 100 | 99.92 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
223 | 0.00 | 2605 | 2603 | 2603 | 0 | 2 | 99.92 | 100 | 0.00 | 7.61 |
228 | 0.00 | 2053 | 2062 | 2047 | 15 | 6 | 99.71 | 99.27 | 0.01 | 5.69 |
230 | 2.78 | 2256 | 2256 | 2256 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.64 |
231 | 0.00 | 1571 | 1570 | 1570 | 0 | 1 | 99.94 | 100 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
232 | 0.00 | 1780 | 1782 | 1780 | 2 | 0 | 100 | 99.89 | 0.00 | 1.68 |
233 | –5.56 | 3079 | 3076 | 3076 | 0 | 3 | 99.90 | 100 | 0.00 | 16.33 |
234 | 0.00 | 2753 | 2752 | 2752 | 0 | 1 | 99.96 | 100 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
Total | 109,494 | 109,491 | 109,249 | 242 | 245 | 99.78 | 99.78 | 0.44 | 8.35 | |
TB: total beats annotated; DB: detected beats by algorithm; TD: Group time delay between TB and DB; TP: true positive, the number of correctly detected R-peaks; FP: false positive, the number of false detected R-peaks; FN: false negative, the number of undetected R-peaks; Se: sensitivity; PPV: positive prediction value; DER: detection error rate; ADE: annotated-detected error. |
File | TD(ms) | TB | DB | TP | FP | FN | Se(%) | PPV(%) | DER(%) | ADE(ms) |
100 | 44.44 | 2273 | 2271 | 2271 | 0 | 2 | 99.91 | 100 | 0.00 | 25.01 |
101 | 30.56 | 1865 | 1868 | 1863 | 5 | 2 | 99.89 | 99.73 | 0.00 | 13.98 |
102 | 22.22 | 2187 | 2187 | 2187 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 18.24 |
103 | 36.11 | 2084 | 2080 | 2079 | 1 | 5 | 99.76 | 99.95 | 0.00 | 16.79 |
104 | 16.67 | 2229 | 2273 | 2221 | 52 | 8 | 99.64 | 97.71 | 0.03 | 21.90 |
105 | 0.00 | 2572 | 2599 | 2561 | 38 | 11 | 99.57 | 98.54 | 0.02 | 18.40 |
106 | 25.00 | 2027 | 1996 | 1995 | 1 | 32 | 98.42 | 99.95 | 0.02 | 23.96 |
107 | 50.00 | 2137 | 2135 | 2135 | 0 | 2 | 99.91 | 100 | 0.00 | 26.49 |
108 | 19.44 | 1763 | 1872 | 1281 | 591 | 482 | 72.66 | 68.43 | 0.61 | 43.72 |
109 | 25.00 | 2532 | 2528 | 2527 | 1 | 5 | 99.80 | 99.96 | 0.00 | 24.43 |
111 | 25.00 | 2124 | 2125 | 2123 | 2 | 1 | 99.95 | 99.91 | 0.00 | 21.21 |
112 | 36.11 | 2539 | 2539 | 2539 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 32.70 |
113 | 44.44 | 1795 | 1794 | 1793 | 1 | 2 | 99.89 | 99.94 | 0.00 | 24.20 |
114 | 47.22 | 1879 | 1882 | 1876 | 6 | 3 | 99.84 | 99.68 | 0.00 | 15.68 |
115 | 38.89 | 1953 | 1953 | 1952 | 1 | 1 | 99.95 | 99.95 | 0.00 | 10.89 |
116 | 30.56 | 2412 | 2391 | 2387 | 4 | 25 | 98.96 | 99.83 | 0.01 | 16.35 |
117 | 25.00 | 1535 | 1535 | 1533 | 2 | 2 | 99.87 | 99.87 | 0.00 | 22.72 |
118 | 41.67 | 2278 | 2278 | 2274 | 4 | 4 | 99.82 | 99.82 | 0.00 | 25.16 |
119 | 30.56 | 1987 | 1988 | 1986 | 2 | 1 | 99.95 | 99.90 | 0.00 | 25.33 |
121 | 16.67 | 1863 | 1864 | 1858 | 6 | 5 | 99.73 | 99.68 | 0.01 | 23.31 |
122 | 2.78 | 2476 | 2476 | 2475 | 1 | 1 | 99.96 | 99.96 | 0.00 | 15.93 |
123 | 52.78 | 1518 | 1515 | 1513 | 2 | 5 | 99.67 | 99.87 | 0.00 | 18.09 |
124 | 8.33 | 1619 | 1620 | 1619 | 1 | 0 | 100 | 99.94 | 0.00 | 21.26 |
200 | 33.33 | 2601 | 2603 | 2596 | 7 | 5 | 99.81 | 99.73 | 0.00 | 22.39 |
201 | 33.33 | 1963 | 1912 | 1912 | 0 | 51 | 97.40 | 100 | 0.03 | 18.87 |
202 | 22.22 | 2136 | 2128 | 2127 | 1 | 9 | 99.58 | 99.95 | 0.00 | 15.54 |
203 | 19.44 | 2980 | 2957 | 2924 | 33 | 57 | 98.09 | 98.88 | 0.03 | 22.66 |
205 | 25.00 | 2656 | 2649 | 2648 | 1 | 8 | 99.70 | 99.96 | 0.00 | 14.22 |
207 | 36.11 | 1860 | 1919 | 1826 | 93 | 34 | 98.17 | 95.15 | 0.07 | 24.20 |
208 | 38.89 | 2955 | 2658 | 2654 | 4 | 301 | 89.81 | 99.85 | 0.10 | 28.16 |
209 | 41.67 | 3005 | 3005 | 3003 | 2 | 2 | 99.93 | 99.93 | 0.00 | 20.36 |
210 | 27.78 | 2650 | 2607 | 2603 | 4 | 47 | 98.23 | 99.85 | 0.02 | 15.29 |
212 | 13.89 | 2748 | 2749 | 2748 | 1 | 0 | 100 | 99.96 | 0.00 | 18.92 |
213 | 16.67 | 3251 | 3249 | 3249 | 0 | 2 | 99.94 | 100 | 0.00 | 26.62 |
214 | 22.22 | 2262 | 2255 | 2253 | 2 | 9 | 99.60 | 99.91 | 0.00 | 14.22 |
215 | 47.22 | 3363 | 3363 | 3362 | 1 | 1 | 99.97 | 99.97 | 0.00 | 19.16 |
217 | 41.67 | 2208 | 2205 | 2202 | 3 | 6 | 99.73 | 99.86 | 0.00 | 25.10 |
219 | 33.33 | 2154 | 2152 | 2150 | 2 | 4 | 99.81 | 99.91 | 0.00 | 17.94 |
220 | 38.89 | 2048 | 2048 | 2046 | 2 | 2 | 99.90 | 99.90 | 0.00 | 17.17 |
221 | 38.89 | 2427 | 2361 | 2360 | 1 | 67 | 97.24 | 99.96 | 0.03 | 21.64 |
222 | 19.44 | 2483 | 2488 | 2483 | 5 | 0 | 100 | 99.80 | 0.00 | 15.72 |
223 | 33.33 | 2605 | 2603 | 2602 | 1 | 3 | 99.88 | 99.96 | 0.00 | 29.88 |
228 | 19.44 | 2053 | 2080 | 2045 | 35 | 8 | 99.61 | 98.32 | 0.02 | 20.37 |
230 | 50.00 | 2256 | 2255 | 2255 | 0 | 1 | 99.96 | 100 | 0.00 | 15.21 |
231 | 41.67 | 1571 | 1569 | 1568 | 1 | 3 | 99.81 | 99.94 | 0.00 | 29.59 |
232 | 44.44 | 1780 | 1790 | 1776 | 14 | 4 | 99.78 | 99.22 | 0.01 | 25.12 |
233 | 22.22 | 3079 | 3072 | 3072 | 0 | 7 | 99.77 | 100 | 0.00 | 19.89 |
234 | 19.44 | 2753 | 2750 | 2750 | 0 | 3 | 99.89 | 100 | 0.00 | 11.04 |
Total | 109,494 | 109,196 | 108,262 | 934 | 1233 | 98.87 | 99.14 | 1.98 | 21.65 |
[1] | Armstrong N (2007) Paediatric exercise physiology: advances in sport and exercise science series. Churchill Livingstone. |
[2] |
Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, et al. (2012) Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: An analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet 380: 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9 ![]() |
[3] |
Ahlskog JE (2018) Aerobic exercise: evidence for a direct brain effect to slow parkinson disease progression. Mayo Clin Proc 93: 360-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.12.015 ![]() |
[4] |
Jakowec MW, Wang Z, Holschneider D, et al. (2016) Engaging cognitive circuits to promote motor recovery in degenerative disorders. exercise as a learning modality. J Hum Kinet 52: 35-51. https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0192 ![]() |
[5] |
Preston N, Magallón S, Hill LJB, et al. (2017) A systematic review of high quality randomized controlled trials investigating motor skill programmes for children with developmental coordination disorder. Clin Rehabil 31: 857-870. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215516661014 ![]() |
[6] | Smits-Engelsman BCM, Jelsma LD, Ferguson GD, et al. (2015) Motor learning: An analysis of 100 trials of a ski slalom game in children with and without developmental coordination disorder. PLoS One 10: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140470 |
[7] |
Piepmeier AT, Shih CH, Whedon M, et al. (2015) The effect of acute exercise on cognitive performance in children with and without ADHD. J Sport Heal Sci 4: 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2014.11.004 ![]() |
[8] |
Medina JA, Netto TLB, Muszkat M, et al. (2010) Exercise impact on sustained attention of ADHD children, methylphenidate effects. ADHD Atten Def Hyp Disord 2: 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12402-009-0018-y ![]() |
[9] |
Saadati H, Esmaeili-Mahani S, Esmaeilpour K, et al. (2015) Exercise improves learning and memory impairments in sleep deprived female rats. Physiol Behav 138: 285-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.10.006 ![]() |
[10] |
Stathopoulou G, Powers MB, Berry A, et al. (2006) Exercise interventions for mental health: A quantitative and qualitative review. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 13: 179-193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2006.00021.x ![]() |
[11] |
Erickson KI, Hillman C, Stillman CM, et al. (2019) Physical activity, cognition, and brain outcomes: A review of the 2018 physical activity guidelines. Med Sci Sport Exerc 51: 1242-1251. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001936 ![]() |
[12] |
Haverkamp BF, Wiersma R, Vertessen K, et al. (2020) Effects of physical activity interventions on cognitive outcomes and academic performance in adolescents and young adults: A meta-analysis. J Sports Sci 38: 2637-2660. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1794763 ![]() |
[13] |
Stillman CM, Esteban-Cornejo I, Brown B, et al. (2020) Effects of exercise on brain and cognition across age groups and health states. Trends Neurosci 43: 533-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2020.04.010 ![]() |
[14] |
Voss MW, Nagamatsu LS, Liu-Ambrose T, et al. (2011) Exercise, brain, and cognition across the life span. J Appl Physiol 111: 1505-1513. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00210.2011 ![]() |
[15] |
Best JR (2010) Effects of physical activity on children's executive function: contributions of experimental research on aerobic exercise. Dev Rev 30: 331-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2010.08.001 ![]() |
[16] |
de Greeff JW, Bosker RJ, Oosterlaan J, et al. (2018) Effects of physical activity on executive functions, attention and academic performance in preadolescent children: a meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport 21: 501-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.595 ![]() |
[17] |
Smith PJ, Blumenthal JA, Hoffman BM, et al. (2010) Aerobic exercise and neurocognitive performance: A meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials. Psychosom Med 72: 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181d14633 ![]() |
[18] |
Tsukamoto H, Suga T, Takenaka S, et al. (2016) Greater impact of acute high-intensity interval exercise on post-exercise executive function compared to moderate-intensity continuous exercise. Physiol Behav 155: 224-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.12.021 ![]() |
[19] |
Griffin ÉW, Mullally S, Foley C, et al. (2011) Aerobic exercise improves hippocampal function and increases BDNF in the serum of young adult males. Physiol Behav 104: 934-941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.06.005 ![]() |
[20] |
Tomporowski PD, Lambourne K, Okumura MS (2011) Physical activity interventions and children's mental function: an introduction and overview. Prev Med 52: S3-S9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.01.028 ![]() |
[21] |
Pereira AC, Huddleston DE, Brickman AM, et al. (2007) An in vivo correlate of exercise-induced neurogenesis in the adult dentate gyrus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 5638-5643. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611721104 ![]() |
[22] |
Yanagisawa H, Dan I, Tsuzuki D, et al. (2010) Acute moderate exercise elicits increased dorsolateral prefrontal activation and improves cognitive performance with Stroop test. Neuroimage 50: 1702-1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.023 ![]() |
[23] |
Martínez-Drudis L, Amorós-Aguilar L, Torras-Garcia M, et al. (2021) Delayed voluntary physical exercise restores “when” and “where” object recognition memory after traumatic brain injury. Behav Brain Res 400: 113048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2020.113048 ![]() |
[24] |
Skriver K, Roig M, Lundbye-Jensen J, et al. (2014) Acute exercise improves motor memory: Exploring potential biomarkers. Neurobiol Learn Mem 116: 46-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2014.08.004 ![]() |
[25] |
Vaynman S, Ying Z, Gomez-Pinilla F (2004) Hippocampal BDNF mediates the efficacy of exercise on synaptic plasticity and cognition. Eur J Neurosci 20: 2580-2590. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03720.x ![]() |
[26] | Chieffi S, Messina G, Villano I, et al. (2017) Neuroprotective effects of physical activity: Evidence from human and animal studies. Front Neurol 8: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00188 |
[27] |
Klein C, Rasińska J, Empl L, et al. (2016) Physical exercise counteracts MPTP-induced changes in neural precursor cell proliferation in the hippocampus and restores spatial learning but not memory performance in the water maze. Behav Brain Res 307: 227-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.02.040 ![]() |
[28] |
Neeper SA, Gómez-Pinilla F, Choi J, et al. (1996) Physical activity increases mRNA for brain-derived neurotrophic factor and nerve growth factor in rat brain. Brain Res 726: 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(96)00273-9 ![]() |
[29] |
Nokia MS, Lensu S, Ahtiainen JP, et al. (2016) Physical exercise increases adult hippocampal neurogenesis in male rats provided it is aerobic and sustained. J Physiol 594: 1855-1873. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP271552 ![]() |
[30] |
Shors TJ (2009) Saving new brain cells. Sci Am 300: 46-52. ![]() |
[31] |
van Praag H, Shubert T, Zhao C, et al. (2005) Exercise enhances learning and hippocampal neurogenesis in aged mice. J Neurosci 25: 8680-8685. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1731-05.2005 ![]() |
[32] |
van Praag H, Christie BR, Sejnowski TJ, et al. (1999) Running enhances neurogenesis, learning, and long-term potentiation in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 13427-13431. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.23.13427 ![]() |
[33] |
Ding Q, Vaynman S, Akhavan M, et al. (2006) Insulin-like growth factor I interfaces with brain-derived neurotrophic factor-mediated synaptic plasticity to modulate aspects of exercise-induced cognitive function. Neuroscience 140: 823-833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.02.084 ![]() |
[34] |
da Costa Daniele TM, de Bruin PFC, de Matos RS, et al. (2020) Exercise effects on brain and behavior in healthy mice, Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease model—A systematic review and meta-analysis. Behav Brain Res 383: 112488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112488 ![]() |
[35] |
Diederich K, Bastl A, Wersching H, et al. (2017) Effects of different exercise strategies and intensities on memory performance and neurogenesis. Front Behav Neurosci 11: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00047 ![]() |
[36] |
Gutierrez RMS, Ricci NA, Gomes QRS, et al. (2018) The effects of acrobatic exercise on brain plasticity: a systematic review of animal studies. Brain Struct Funct 223: 2055-2071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-018-1631-3 ![]() |
[37] |
Kim TW, Park HS (2018) Physical exercise improves cognitive function by enhancing hippocampal neurogenesis and inhibiting apoptosis in male offspring born to obese mother. Behav Brain Res 347: 360-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2018.03.018 ![]() |
[38] |
Snigdha S, de Rivera C, Milgram NW, et al. (2014) Exercise enhances memory consolidation in the aging brain. Front Aging Neurosci 6: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00003 ![]() |
[39] |
Loprinzi PD, Frith E (2019) Protective and therapeutic effects of exercise on stress-induced memory impairment. J Physiol Sci 69: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12576-018-0638-0 ![]() |
[40] |
Fuss J, Biedermann SV, Falfán-Melgoza C, et al. (2014) Exercise boosts hippocampal volume by preventing early age-related gray matter loss. Hippocampus 24: 131-134. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22227 ![]() |
[41] |
Real CC, Garcia PC, Britto LRG, et al. (2015) Different protocols of treadmill exercise induce distinct neuroplastic effects in rat brain motor areas. Brain Res 1624: 188-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.06.052 ![]() |
[42] |
Salame S, Garcia PC, Real CC, et al. (2016) Distinct neuroplasticity processes are induced by different periods of acrobatic exercise training. Behav Brain Res 308: 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.04.029 ![]() |
[43] |
Modaberi S, Shahbazi M, Dehghan M, et al. (2018) The role of mild treadmill exercise on spatial learning and memory and motor activity in animal models of ibotenic acid-induced striatum lesion. Sport Sci Health 14: 587-596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-018-0467-9 ![]() |
[44] |
Vaynman S, Gomez-pinilla F (2006) Revenge of the “sit”: How lifestyle impacts neuronal and cognitive health through molecular systems that interface energy metabolism with neuronal plasticity. J Neurosci Res 84: 699-715. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.20979 ![]() |
[45] |
Swain RA, Berggren KL, Kerr AL, et al. (2012) On aerobic exercise and behavioral and neural plasticity. Brain Sci 2: 709-744. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci2040709 ![]() |
[46] |
El-Sayes J, Harasym D, Turco CV, et al. (2019) Exercise-induced neuroplasticity: a mechanistic model and prospects for promoting plasticity. Neuroscientist 25: 65-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858418771538 ![]() |
[47] |
Feter N, Alt R, Dias MG, et al. (2019) How do different physical exercise parameters modulate brain-derived neurotrophic factor in healthy and non-healthy adults? A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Sci Sport 34: 293-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scispo.2019.02.001 ![]() |
[48] |
Cotman CW, Berchtold NC, Christie LA (2007) Exercise builds brain health: key roles of growth factor cascades and inflammation. Trends Neurosci 30: 464-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2007.06.011 ![]() |
[49] |
Voss MW, Erickson KI, Prakash RS, et al. (2013) Neurobiological markers of exercise-related brain plasticity in older adults. Brain Behav Immun 28: 90-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2012.10.021 ![]() |
[50] |
Erickson KI, Prakash RS, Voss MW, et al. (2009) Aerobic fitness is associated with hippocampal volume in elderly humans. Hippocampus 19: 1030-1039. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20547 ![]() |
[51] |
Erickson KI, Voss MW, Prakash RS, et al. (2011) Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 3017-3022. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015950108 ![]() |
[52] |
Feter N, Penny JC, Freitas MP, et al. (2018) Effect of physical exercise on hippocampal volume in adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Sport 33: 327-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scispo.2018.02.011 ![]() |
[53] | Becker L, Kutz D, Voelcker-Rehage C (2016) Exercise-induced changes in basal ganglia volume and their relation to cognitive performance. J Neurol Neuromedicine 1: 19-24. https://doi.org/10.29245/2572.942x/2016/5.1044 |
[54] |
McMorris T, Hale BJ (2012) Differential effects of differing intensities of acute exercise on speed and accuracy of cognition: A meta-analytical investigation. Brain Cogn 80: 338-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2012.09.001 ![]() |
[55] |
Roig M, Nordbrandt S, Geertsen SS, et al. (2013) The effects of cardiovascular exercise on human memory: A review with meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37: 1645-1666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.012 ![]() |
[56] |
de Sousa AFM, Medeiros AR, Del Rosso S, et al. (2019) The influence of exercise and physical fitness status on attention: a systematic review. Int Rev Sport Exercise Psychol 12: 202-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2018.1455889 ![]() |
[57] |
Cotman CW, Berchtold NC (2002) Exercise: A behavioral intervention to enhance brain health and plasticity. Trends Neurosci 25: 295-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(02)02143-4 ![]() |
[58] | Hasan SMM, Rancourt SN, Austin MW, et al. (2016) Defining optimal aerobic exercise parameters to affect complex motor and cognitive outcomes after stroke: a systematic review and synthesis. Neural Plast . https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2961573 |
[59] |
Singh AM, Neva JL, Staines WR (2016) Aerobic exercise enhances neural correlates of motor skill learning. Behav Brain Res 301: 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2015.12.020 ![]() |
[60] |
Salthouse TA, Davis HP (2006) Organization of cognitive abilities and neuropsychological variables across the lifespan. Dev Rev 26: 31-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.09.001 ![]() |
[61] |
Hillman CH, Erickson KI, Kramer AF (2008) Be smart, exercise your heart: exercise effects on brain and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci 9: 58-65. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2298 ![]() |
[62] |
Castelli DM, Hillman CH, Buck SM, et al. (2007) Physical fitness and academic achievement in third- and fifth-grade students. J Sport Exerc Psychol 29: 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.29.2.239 ![]() |
[63] |
Fedewa AL, Ahn S (2011) The effects of physical activity and physical fitness on children's achievement and cognitive outcomes:a meta-analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport 82: 521-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2011.10599785 ![]() |
[64] |
Kantomaa MT, Stamatakis E, Kankaanpää A, et al. (2013) Physical activity and obesity mediate the association between childhood motor function and adolescents' academic achievement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 1917-1922. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1214574110 ![]() |
[65] |
Lopes L, Santos R, Pereira B, et al. (2013) Associations between gross motor coordination and academic achievement in elementary school children. Hum Mov Sci 32: 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2012.05.005 ![]() |
[66] |
Sibley BA, Etnier JL (2003) The relationship between physical activity and cognition in children: A meta-analysis. Pediatr Exercise Sci 15: 243-256. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.15.3.243 ![]() |
[67] |
Tomporowski PD, McCullick B, Pendleton DM, et al. (2015) Exercise and children's cognition: The role of exercise characteristics and a place for metacognition. J Sport Health Sci 4: 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2014.09.003 ![]() |
[68] |
Trudeau F, Shephard RJ (2008) Physical education, school physical activity, school sports and academic performance. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 5: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-5-10 ![]() |
[69] |
Meijer A, Königs M, Vermeulen GT, et al. (2020) The effects of physical activity on brain structure and neurophysiological functioning in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Cogn Neurosci 45: 100828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100828 ![]() |
[70] |
Chaddock L, Erickson KI, Prakash RS, et al. (2010) Basal ganglia volume is associated with aerobic fitness in preadolescent children. Dev Neurosci 32: 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1159/000316648 ![]() |
[71] |
Chaddock L, Erickson KI, Prakash RS, et al. (2010) A neuroimaging investigation of the association between aerobic fitness, hippocampal volume, and memory performance in preadolescent children. Brain Res 1358: 172-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.049 ![]() |
[72] | Stojiljković N, Mitić P, Sporiš G (2020) Can exercise make our children smarter?. Ann Kinesiol 10: 115-127. https://doi.org/10.35469/ak.2019.211 |
[73] |
Chaddock L, Erickson KI, Prakash RS, et al. (2012) A functional MRI investigation of the association between childhood aerobic fitness and neurocognitive control. Biol Psychol 89: 260-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.10.017 ![]() |
[74] |
Pontifex MB, Raine LB, Johnson CR, et al. (2011) Cardiorespiratory fitness and the flexible modulation of cognitive control in preadolescent children. J Cogn Neurosci 23: 1332-1345. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21528 ![]() |
[75] |
Scudder MR, Federmeier KD, Raine LB, et al. (2014) The association between aerobic fitness and language processing in children: Implications for academic achievement. Brain Cogn 87: 140-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2014.03.016 ![]() |
[76] |
Xue Y, Yang Y, Huang T (2019) Effects of chronic exercise interventions on executive function among children and adolescents: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 53: 1397-1404. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-099825 ![]() |
[77] |
Aguiar AS, Castro AA, Moreira EL, et al. (2011) Short bouts of mild-intensity physical exercise improve spatial learning and memory in aging rats: Involvement of hippocampal plasticity via AKT, CREB and BDNF signaling. Mech Ageing Dev 132: 560-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2011.09.005 ![]() |
[78] |
Raine LB, Khan NA, Drollette ES, et al. (2017) Obesity, visceral adipose tissue, and cognitive function in childhood. J Pediatr 187: 134-140.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.05.023 ![]() |
[79] |
Pianta S, Lee JY, Tuazon JP, et al. (2019) A short bout of exercise prior to stroke improves functional outcomes by enhancing angiogenesis. Neuromol Med 21: 517-528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12017-019-08533-x ![]() |
[80] |
Basso JC, Suzuki WA (2017) The effects of acute exercise on mood, cognition, neurophysiology, and neurochemical pathways: a review. Brain Plast 2: 127-152. https://doi.org/10.3233/bpl-160040 ![]() |
[81] |
Naylor AS, Persson AI, Eriksson PS, et al. (2005) Extended voluntary running inhibits exercise-induced adult hippocampal progenitor proliferation in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. J Neurophysiol 93: 2406-2414. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01085.2004 ![]() |
[82] |
Stein AM, Munive V, Fernandez AM, et al. (2017) Acute exercise does not modify brain activity and memory performance in APP/PS1 mice. PLoS One 12: e0178247. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178247 ![]() |
[83] |
Fernandes J, Soares JCK, do Amaral Baliego LGZ, et al. (2016) A single bout of resistance exercise improves memory consolidation and increases the expression of synaptic proteins in the hippocampus. Hippocampus 26: 1096-1103. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22590 ![]() |
[84] |
da Silva de Vargas L, Neves BHS das, Roehrs R, et al. (2017) One-single physical exercise session after object recognition learning promotes memory persistence through hippocampal noradrenergic mechanisms. Behav Brain Res 329: 120-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.04.050 ![]() |
[85] |
Rossi Daré L, Garcia A, Neves BH, et al. (2020) One physical exercise session promotes recognition learning in rats with cognitive deficits related to amyloid beta neurotoxicity. Brain Res 1744: 146918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146918 ![]() |
[86] |
Nguemeni C, McDonald MW, Jeffers MS, et al. (2018) Short- and long-term exposure to low and high dose running produce differential effects on hippocampal neurogenesis. Neuroscience 369: 202-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.11.026 ![]() |
[87] | Statton MA, Encarnacion M, Celnik P, et al. (2015) A single bout of moderate aerobic exercise improves motor skill acquisition. PLoS One 10: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141393 |
[88] |
Smith AE, Goldsworthy MR, Garside T, et al. (2014) The influence of a single bout of aerobic exercise on short-interval intracortical excitability. Exp Brain Res 232: 1875-1882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3879-z ![]() |
[89] |
Giles GE, Brunyé TT, Eddy MD, et al. (2014) Acute exercise increases oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin in the prefrontal cortex. Neuroreport 25: 1320-1325. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000266 ![]() |
[90] |
Lulic T, El-Sayes J, Fassett HJ, et al. (2017) Physical activity levels determine exercise-induced changes in brain excitability. PLoS One 12: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173672 ![]() |
[91] |
Suwabe K, Byun K, Hyodo K, et al. (2018) Rapid stimulation of human dentate gyrus function with acute mild exercise. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115: 10487-10492. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805668115 ![]() |
[92] |
Wagner G, Herbsleb M, de la Cruz F, et al. (2017) Changes in fMRI activation in anterior hippocampus and motor cortex during memory retrieval after an intense exercise intervention. Biol Psychol 124: 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.01.003 ![]() |
[93] |
Chang YK, Labban JD, Gapin JI, et al. (2012) The effects of acute exercise on cognitive performance: A meta-analysis. Brain Res 1453: 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.068 ![]() |
[94] |
Austin M, Loprinzi PD (2019) Acute exercise and mindfulness meditation on learning and memory: Randomized controlled intervention. Heal Promot Perspect 9: 314-318. https://doi.org/10.15171/hpp.2019.43 ![]() |
[95] |
Perini R, Bortoletto M, Capogrosso M, et al. (2016) Acute effects of aerobic exercise promote learning. Sci Rep 6: 25440. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25440 ![]() |
[96] |
Chu CH, Alderman BL, Wei GX, et al. (2015) Effects of acute aerobic exercise on motor response inhibition: An ERP study using the stop-signal task. J Sport Health Sci 4: 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2014.12.002 ![]() |
[97] |
Hsieh SS, Huang CJ, Wu CT, et al. (2018) Acute exercise facilitates the N450 inhibition marker and P3 attention marker during Stroop test in young and older adults. J Clin Med 7: 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7110391 ![]() |
[98] |
Samani A, Heath M (2018) Executive-related oculomotor control is improved following a 10-min single-bout of aerobic exercise: Evidence from the antisaccade task. Neuropsychologia 108: 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.11.029 ![]() |
[99] |
Tsukamoto H, Suga T, Takenaka S, et al. (2016) Repeated high-intensity interval exercise shortens the positive effect on executive function during post-exercise recovery in healthy young males. Physiol Behav 160: 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.03.029 ![]() |
[100] |
Coles K, Tomporowski PD (2008) Effects of acute exercise on executive processing, short-term and long-term memory. J Sports Sci 26: 333-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410701591417 ![]() |
[101] |
Hsieh SS, Chang YK, Hung TM, et al. (2016) The effects of acute resistance exercise on young and older males' working memory. Psychol Sport Exerc 22: 286-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.09.004 ![]() |
[102] |
Martins AQ, Kavussanu M, Willoughby A, et al. (2013) Moderate intensity exercise facilitates working memory. Psychol Sport Exerc 14: 323-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.11.010 ![]() |
[103] |
Weinberg L, Hasni A, Shinohara M, et al. (2014) A single bout of resistance exercise can enhance episodic memory performance. Acta Psychol 153: 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.011 ![]() |
[104] |
Winter B, Breitenstein C, Mooren FC, et al. (2007) High impact running improves learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 87: 597-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2006.11.003 ![]() |
[105] |
Dinoff A, Herrmann N, Swardfager W, et al. (2017) The effect of acute exercise on blood concentrations of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in healthy adults: A meta-analysis. Eur J Neurosci 46: 1635-1646. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13603 ![]() |
[106] |
Moore D, Loprinzi PD (2020) Exercise influences episodic memory via changes in hippocampal neurocircuitry and long-term potentiation. Eur J Neurosci 54: 6960-6971. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14728 ![]() |
[107] |
Ogoh S, Tsukamoto H, Hirasawa A, et al. (2014) The effect of changes in cerebral blood flow on cognitive function during exercise. Physiol Rep 2: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12163 ![]() |
[108] |
Steinborn MB, Huestegge L (2016) A walk down the lane gives wings to your brain. Restorative benefits of rest breaks on cognition and self-control. Appl Cogn Psychol 30: 795-805. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3255 ![]() |
[109] |
Chang YK, Liu S, Yu HH, et al. (2012) Effect of acute exercise on executive function in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 27: 225-237. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acr094 ![]() |
[110] | Nofuji Y, Suwa M, Sasaki H, et al. (2012) Different circulating brain-derived neurotrophic factor responses to acute exercise between physically active and sedentary subjects. J Sport Sci Med 11: 83-88. |
[111] |
Tomporowski PD (2003) Effects of acute bouts of exercise on cognition. Acta Psychol 112: 297-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-6918(02)00134-8 ![]() |
[112] |
Pontifex MB, McGowan AL, Chandler MC, et al. (2019) A primer on investigating the after effects of acute bouts of physical activity on cognition. Psychol Sport Exerc 40: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.08.015 ![]() |
[113] |
Ferris LT, Williams JS, Shen CL (2007) The effect of acute exercise on serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels and cognitive function. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39: 728-734. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e31802f04c7 ![]() |
[114] |
Schmitt A, Upadhyay N, Martin JA, et al. (2019) Modulation of distinct intrinsic resting state brain networks by acute exercise bouts of differing intensity. Brain Plast 5: 39-55. https://doi.org/10.3233/bpl-190081 ![]() |
[115] |
Mehren A, Luque CD, Brandes M, et al. (2019) Intensity-dependent effects of acute exercise on executive function. Neural Plast 2019: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8608317 ![]() |
[116] |
Alves CRR, Tessaro VH, Teixeira LAC, et al. (2014) Influence of acute high-intensity aerobic interval exercise bout on selective attention and short-term memory tasks. Percept Mot Skills 118: 63-72. https://doi.org/10.2466/22.06.PMS.118k10w4 ![]() |
[117] |
Du Rietz E, Barker AR, Michelini G, et al. (2019) Beneficial effects of acute high-intensity exercise on electrophysiological indices of attention processes in young adult men. Behav Brain Res 359: 474-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2018.11.024 ![]() |
[118] |
Roig M, Skriver K, Lundbye-Jensen J, et al. (2012) A single bout of exercise improves motor memory. PLoS One 7: e44594. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044594 ![]() |
[119] | Thomas R, Johnsen LK, Geertsen SS, et al. (2016) Acute exercise and motor memory consolidation: The role of exercise intensity. PLoS One 11: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159589 |
[120] |
Grego F, Vallier JM, Collardeau M, et al. (2005) Influence of exercise duration and hydration status on cognitive function during prolonged cycling exercise. Int J Sports Med 26: 27-33. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-817915 ![]() |
[121] |
Ai JY, Chen FT, Hsieh SS, et al. (2021) The effect of acute high-intensity interval training on executive function: A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18: 3593. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073593 ![]() |
[122] |
Loprinzi PD, Roig M, Etnier JL, et al. (2021) Acute and chronic exercise effects on human memory: What we know and where to go from here. J Clin Med 10: 4812. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214812 ![]() |
[123] |
Benzing V, Heinks T, Eggenberger N, et al. (2016) Acute cognitively engaging exergame-based physical activity enhances executive functions in adolescents. PLoS One 11: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167501 ![]() |
[124] |
Pesce C, Crova C, Cereatti L, et al. (2009) Physical activity and mental performance in preadolescents: Effects of acute exercise on free-recall memory. Ment Health Phys Act 2: 16-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2009.02.001 ![]() |
[125] |
Berman MG, Jonides J, Kaplan S (2008) The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychol Sci 19: 1207-1212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x ![]() |
[126] |
O'Leary KC, Pontifex MB, Scudder MR, et al. (2011) The effects of single bouts of aerobic exercise, exergaming, and videogame play on cognitive control. Clin Neurophysiol 122: 1518-1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2011.01.049 ![]() |
[127] |
Thomas R, Flindtgaard M, Skriver K, et al. (2017) Acute exercise and motor memory consolidation: Does exercise type play a role?. Scand J Med Sci Sport 27: 1523-1532. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12791 ![]() |
[128] |
Labelle V, Bosquet L, Mekary S, et al. (2013) Decline in executive control during acute bouts of exercise as a function of exercise intensity and fitness level. Brain Cogn 81: 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2012.10.001 ![]() |
[129] |
Tsai CL, Chen FC, Pan CY, et al. (2014) Impact of acute aerobic exercise and cardiorespiratory fitness on visuospatial attention performance and serum BDNF levels. Psychoneuroendocrinology 41: 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.12.014 ![]() |
[130] |
Colcombe SJ, Kramer AF, Erickson KI, et al. (2004) Cardiovascular fitness, cortical plasticity, and aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 3316-3321. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400266101 ![]() |
[131] |
Holzschneider K, Wolbers T, Röder B, et al. (2012) Cardiovascular fitness modulates brain activation associated with spatial learning. Neuroimage 59: 3003-3014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.021 ![]() |
[132] |
Dupuy O, Bosquet L, Fraser SA, et al. (2018) Higher cardiovascular fitness level is associated to better cognitive dual-task performance in Master Athletes: Mediation by cardiac autonomic control. Brain Cogn 125: 127-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2018.06.003 ![]() |
[133] |
Schwarb H, Johnson CL, Daugherty AM, et al. (2017) Aerobic fitness, hippocampal viscoelasticity, and relational memory performance. Neuroimage 153: 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.061 ![]() |
[134] |
Hüttermann S, Memmert D (2014) Does the inverted-U function disappear in expert athletes? An analysis of the attentional behavior under physical exercise of athletes and non-athletes. Physiol Behav 131: 87-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.04.020 ![]() |
[135] |
Hwang J, Castelli DM, Gonzalez-Lima F (2017) The positive cognitive impact of aerobic fitness is associated with peripheral inflammatory and brain-derived neurotrophic biomarkers in young adults. Physiol Behav 179: 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.05.011 ![]() |
[136] |
Hopkins ME, Davis FC, Vantieghem MR, et al. (2012) Differential effects of acute and regular physical exercise on cognition and affect. Neuroscience 215: 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.056 ![]() |
[137] |
Hübner L, Voelcker-Rehage C (2017) Does physical activity benefit motor performance and learning of upper extremity tasks in older adults?—A systematic review. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act 14: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-017-0181-7 ![]() |
[138] |
Roig M, Thomas R, Mang CS, et al. (2016) Time-dependent effects of cardiovascular exercise on memory. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 44: 81-88. https://doi.org/10.1249/JES.0000000000000078 ![]() |
[139] |
Lind RR, Beck MM, Wikman J, et al. (2019) Acute high-intensity football games can improve children's inhibitory control and neurophysiological measures of attention. Scand J Med Sci Sport 29: 1546-1562. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13485 ![]() |
[140] |
Thomas R, Beck MM, Lind RR, et al. (2016) Acute exercise and motor memory consolidation: The role of exercise timing. Neural Plast 2016: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6205452 ![]() |
[141] |
van Dongen EV, Kersten IHP, Wagner IC, et al. (2016) Physical exercise performed four hours after learning improves memory retention and increases hippocampal pattern similarity during retrieval. Curr Biol 26: 1722-1727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.071 ![]() |
[142] |
Loprinzi PD, Blough J, Crawford L, et al. (2019) The temporal effects of acute exercise on episodic memory function: Systematic review with meta-analysis. Brain Sci 9: 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9040087 ![]() |
[143] |
Zhang B, Liu Y, Zhao M, et al. (2020) Differential effects of acute physical activity on executive function in preschoolers with high and low habitual physical activity levels. Ment Health Phys Act 18: 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2020.100326 ![]() |
[144] |
Oberste M, Javelle F, Sharma S, et al. (2019) Effects and moderators of acute aerobic exercise on subsequent interference control: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychol 10: 2616. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02616 ![]() |
[145] |
Budde H, Voelcker-Rehage C, Pietraßyk-Kendziorra S, et al. (2008) Acute coordinative exercise improves attentional performance in adolescents. Neurosci Lett 441: 219-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2008.06.024 ![]() |
[146] |
Ellemberg D, St-Louis-Deschênes M (2010) The effect of acute physical exercise on cognitive function during development. Psychol Sport Exerc 11: 122-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.09.006 ![]() |
[147] |
Chen AG, Yan J, Yin HC, et al. (2014) Effects of acute aerobic exercise on multiple aspects of executive function in preadolescent children. Psychol Sport Exerc 15: 627-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.06.004 ![]() |
[148] |
Ludyga S, Gerber M, Brand S, et al. (2016) Acute effects of moderate aerobic exercise on specific aspects of executive function in different age and fitness groups: A meta-analysis. Psychophysiology 53: 1611-1626. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12736 ![]() |
[149] |
Etnier J, Labban JD, Piepmeier A, et al. (2014) Effects of an acute bout of exercise on memory in 6th grade children. Pediatr Exerc Sci 26: 250-258. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2013-0141 ![]() |
[150] |
Pesce C, Conzelmann A, Jäger K, et al. (2017) Disentangling the relationship between children's motor ability, executive function and academic achievement. PLoS One 12: e0182845. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182845 ![]() |
[151] |
Williams RA, Hatch L, Cooper SB (2019) A review of factors affecting the acute exercise-cognition relationship in children and adolescents. OBM Integr Complement Med 4: 1. https://doi.org/10.21926/OBM.ICM.1903049 ![]() |
[152] |
Angulo-Barroso R, Ferrer-Uris B, Busquets A (2019) Enhancing children's motor memory retention through acute intense exercise: Effects of different exercise durations. Front Psychol 10: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02000 ![]() |
[153] |
Budde H, Voelcker-Rehage C, Pietraßyk-Kendziorra S, et al. (2008) Acute coordinative exercise improves attentional performance in adolescents. Neurosci Lett 441: 219-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2008.06.024 ![]() |
[154] |
Jäger K, Schmidt M, Conzelmann A, et al. (2015) The effects of qualitatively different acute physical activity interventions in real-world settings on executive functions in preadolescent children. Ment Health Phys Act 9: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2015.05.002 ![]() |
[155] |
Hillman CH, Pontifex MB, Raine LB, et al. (2009) The effect of acute treadmill walking on cognitive control and academic achievement in preadolescent children. Neuroscience 159: 1044-1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.01.057 ![]() |
[156] |
Stroth S, Kubesch S, Dieterle K, et al. (2009) Physical fitness, but not acute exercise modulates event-related potential indices for executive control in healthy adolescents. Brain Res 1269: 114-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.02.073 ![]() |
[157] |
Tomporowski PD, Davis CL, Lambourne K, et al. (2008) Task switching in overweight children: Effects of acute exercise and age. J Sport Exerc Psychol 30: 497-511. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.30.5.497 ![]() |
[158] |
Maltais DB, Gane C, Dufour SK, et al. (2016) Acute physical exercise affects cognitive functioning in children With cerebral palsy. Pediatr Exerc Sci 28: 304-311. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2015-0110 ![]() |
[159] | Villa-González R, Villalba-Heredia L, Crespo I, et al. (2020) A systematic review of acute exercise as a coadjuvant treatment of ADHD in young people. Psicothema 32: 67-74. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.211 |
[160] |
Bremer E, Graham JD, Heisz JJ, et al. (2020) Effect of acute exercise on prefrontal oxygenation and inhibitory control among male children with autism spectrum disorder: an exploratory study. Front Behav Neurosci 14: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00084 ![]() |
[161] |
Metcalfe AWS, MacIntosh BJ, Scavone A, et al. (2016) Effects of acute aerobic exercise on neural correlates of attention and inhibition in adolescents with bipolar disorder. Transl Psychiatry 6: e814. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2016.85 ![]() |
[162] |
Ng QX, Ho CYX, Chan HW, et al. (2017) Managing childhood and adolescent attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with exercise: A systematic review. Complement Ther Med 34: 123-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2017.08.018 ![]() |
[163] |
Suarez-Manzano S, Ruiz-Ariza A, De La Torre-Cruz M, et al. (2018) Acute and chronic effect of physical activity on cognition and behaviour in young people with ADHD: A systematic review of intervention studies. Res Dev Disabil 77: 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.03.015 ![]() |
[164] |
Smith AL, Hoza B, Linnea K, et al. (2013) Pilot physical activity intervention reduces severity of ADHD symptoms in young children. J Atten Disord 17: 70-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054711417395 ![]() |
[165] |
Vysniauske R, Verburgh L, Oosterlaan J, et al. (2016) The effects of physical exercise on functional outcomes in the treatment of ADHD: a meta-analysis. J Atten Disord 24: 644-654. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054715627489 ![]() |
[166] |
Chandrasekaran B, Pesola AJ, Rao CR, et al. (2021) Does breaking up prolonged sitting improve cognitive functions in sedentary adults? A mapping review and hypothesis formulation on the potential physiological mechanisms. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04136-5 ![]() |
[167] |
Edington DW, Schultz AB, Pitts JS, et al. (2015) The future of health promotion in the 21st century: a focus on the working population. Am J Lifestyle Med 10: 242-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827615605789 ![]() |
[168] |
Taylor WC (2005) Transforming work breaks to promote health. Am J Prev Med 29: 461-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.08.040 ![]() |
[169] |
Taylor WC, King KE, Shegog R, et al. (2013) Booster breaks in the workplace: participants' perspectives on health-promoting work breaks. Health Educ Res 28: 414-425. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyt001 ![]() |
[170] |
Wollseiffen P, Ghadiri A, Scholz A, et al. (2015) Short bouts of intensive exercise during the workday have a positive effect on neuro-cognitive performance. Stress Health 32: 514-523. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2654 ![]() |
[171] |
Mahar MT, Murphy SK, Rowe DA, et al. (2006) Effects of a classroom-based program on physical activity and on-task behavior. Med Sci Sports Exercise 38: 2086-2094. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000235359.16685.a3 ![]() |
[172] |
Mahar MT (2011) Impact of short bouts of physical activity on attention-to-task in elementary school children. Prev Med 52: S60-S64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.01.026 ![]() |
[173] | Schmidt M, Benzing V, Kamer M (2016) Classroom-based physical activity breaks and children's attention: Cognitive engagement works!. Front Psychol 7: 1474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01474 |
[174] |
Engelen L, Chau J, Young S, et al. (2018) Is activity-based working impacting health, work performance and perceptions? A systematic review. Build Res Inf 47: 468-479. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2018.1440958 ![]() |
[175] |
Arundell L, Sudholz B, Teychenne M, et al. (2018) The impact of activity based working (ABW) on workplace activity, eating behaviours, productivity, and satisfaction. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15: 1005. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15051005 ![]() |
[176] |
Proper KI, Staal BJ, Hildebrandt VH, et al. (2002) Effectiveness of physical activity programs at worksites with respect to work-related outcomes. Scand J Work Environ Health 28: 75-84. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.651 ![]() |
1. | Kaiyu Zhang, Sobolev estimates and inverse Hölder estimates on a class of non-divergence variation-inequality problem arising in American option pricing, 2024, 32, 2688-1594, 5975, 10.3934/era.2024277 | |
2. | Jia Li, Zhipeng Tong, Local Hölder continuity of inverse variation-inequality problem constructed by non-Newtonian polytropic operators in finance, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 28753, 10.3934/math.20231472 | |
3. | Jia Li, Zhipeng Tong, Local boundedness and Harnack inequality for an inverse variational inequality problem with double nonlinear parabolic operator in finance, 2024, 2024, 1029-242X, 10.1186/s13660-024-03230-1 | |
4. | Qingjun Zhao, The L∞ estimate of the spatial gradient of the solution to a variational inequality problem originates from the financial contract problem with advanced implementation clauses, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 35949, 10.3934/math.20241704 |
Pan-Tompkins Algorithm | Proposed Algorithm | |||||||
Tolerance | Se(%) | PPV(%) | DER(%) | ADE(ms) | Se(%) | PPV(%) | DER(%) | ADE(ms) |
150 ms | 98.87 | 99.14 | 1.98 | 21.65 | 99.78 | 99.78 | 0.44 | 8.35 |
25 ms | 79.41 | 79.63 | 40.90 | 13.37 | 96.82 | 96.82 | 6.36 | 3.17 |
2.78 ms | 11.85 | 11.88 | 176.03 | 2.42 | 86.18 | 86.18 | 27.64 | 1.86 |
Note: TB: total beats annotated; Se: sensitivity; PPV: positive prediction value; DER: detection error rate; ADE: annotated-detected error. |
File | ADE(ms) | TB | N | V | / | Q | F | f | S |
122 | 1.12 | 2476 | 2476 | ||||||
115 | 1.19 | 1953 | 1953 | ||||||
104 | 16.75 | 2229 | 163 | 2 | 1380 | 18 | 1 | 666 | |
208 | 24.96 | 2955 | 1586 | 992 | 2 | 373 | 2 | ||
Note: normal beats; V: beats of premature ventricular contract; /: paced beats; f: fusion of paced and normal beats; Q: Unclassifiable beats; F: fusion of ventricular and normal beats; S: supraventricular premature beats. |
File | TD(ms) | TB | DB | TP | FP | FN | Se(%) | PPV(%) | DER(%) | ADE(ms) |
100 | 0.00 | 2273 | 2273 | 2273 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 2.21 |
101 | 0.00 | 1865 | 1865 | 1862 | 3 | 3 | 99.84 | 99.84 | 0.00 | 2.53 |
102 | 0.00 | 2187 | 2187 | 2187 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 10.80 |
103 | 0.00 | 2084 | 2083 | 2083 | 0 | 1 | 99.95 | 100 | 0.00 | 2.32 |
104 | 0.00 | 2229 | 2237 | 2228 | 9 | 1 | 99.96 | 99.60 | 0.00 | 16.75 |
105 | 0.00 | 2572 | 2590 | 2557 | 33 | 15 | 99.42 | 98.73 | 0.02 | 9.54 |
106 | 0.00 | 2027 | 2021 | 2020 | 1 | 7 | 99.65 | 99.95 | 0.00 | 5.30 |
107 | –2.78 | 2137 | 2136 | 2135 | 1 | 2 | 99.91 | 99.95 | 0.00 | 7.47 |
108 | 2.78 | 1763 | 1758 | 1754 | 4 | 9 | 99.49 | 99.77 | 0.01 | 14.95 |
109 | –2.78 | 2532 | 2530 | 2530 | 0 | 2 | 99.92 | 100 | 0.00 | 5.08 |
111 | 0.00 | 2124 | 2123 | 2123 | 0 | 1 | 99.95 | 100 | 0.00 | 5.78 |
112 | 0.00 | 2539 | 2539 | 2539 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 2.14 |
113 | 0.00 | 1795 | 1795 | 1795 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.93 |
114 | 30.56 | 1879 | 1880 | 1876 | 4 | 3 | 99.84 | 99.79 | 0.00 | 8.02 |
115 | 2.78 | 1953 | 1953 | 1953 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.12 |
116 | 0.00 | 2412 | 2390 | 2387 | 3 | 25 | 98.96 | 99.87 | 0.01 | 2.91 |
117 | –19.44 | 1535 | 1535 | 1535 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 6.97 |
118 | 0.00 | 2278 | 2278 | 2278 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 3.15 |
119 | 0.00 | 1987 | 1988 | 1987 | 1 | 0 | 100 | 99.95 | 0.00 | 6.00 |
121 | –2.78 | 1863 | 1861 | 1861 | 0 | 2 | 99.89 | 100 | 0.00 | 2.26 |
122 | 0.00 | 2476 | 2476 | 2476 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.19 |
123 | 0.00 | 1518 | 1518 | 1518 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.82 |
124 | 0.00 | 1619 | 1619 | 1619 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 6.99 |
200 | –5.56 | 2601 | 2601 | 2599 | 2 | 2 | 99.92 | 99.92 | 0.00 | 17.64 |
201 | 0.00 | 1963 | 1942 | 1942 | 0 | 21 | 98.93 | 100 | 0.01 | 4.15 |
202 | 0.00 | 2136 | 2122 | 2122 | 0 | 14 | 99.34 | 100 | 0.01 | 2.47 |
203 | –5.56 | 2980 | 2954 | 2937 | 17 | 43 | 98.56 | 99.42 | 0.02 | 15.28 |
205 | 0.00 | 2656 | 2648 | 2648 | 0 | 8 | 99.70 | 100 | 0.00 | 5.27 |
207 | 0.00 | 1860 | 1991 | 1852 | 139 | 8 | 99.57 | 93.02 | 0.08 | 12.98 |
208 | 8.33 | 2955 | 2939 | 2936 | 3 | 19 | 99.36 | 99.90 | 0.01 | 24.96 |
209 | 0.00 | 3005 | 3005 | 3005 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.54 |
210 | 0.00 | 2650 | 2623 | 2621 | 2 | 29 | 98.91 | 99.92 | 0.01 | 7.34 |
212 | 0.00 | 2748 | 2748 | 2748 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 2.24 |
213 | 0.00 | 3251 | 3248 | 3248 | 0 | 3 | 99.91 | 100 | 0.00 | 5.78 |
214 | 0.00 | 2262 | 2258 | 2258 | 0 | 4 | 99.82 | 100 | 0.00 | 4.60 |
215 | 0.00 | 3363 | 3359 | 3359 | 0 | 4 | 99.88 | 100 | 0.00 | 3.18 |
217 | –13.89 | 2208 | 2205 | 2204 | 1 | 4 | 99.82 | 99.95 | 0.00 | 8.09 |
219 | 0.00 | 2154 | 2154 | 2154 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.46 |
220 | 2.78 | 2048 | 2048 | 2048 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.82 |
221 | 0.00 | 2427 | 2425 | 2425 | 0 | 2 | 99.92 | 100 | 0.00 | 2.65 |
222 | 0.00 | 2483 | 2485 | 2483 | 2 | 0 | 100 | 99.92 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
223 | 0.00 | 2605 | 2603 | 2603 | 0 | 2 | 99.92 | 100 | 0.00 | 7.61 |
228 | 0.00 | 2053 | 2062 | 2047 | 15 | 6 | 99.71 | 99.27 | 0.01 | 5.69 |
230 | 2.78 | 2256 | 2256 | 2256 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.64 |
231 | 0.00 | 1571 | 1570 | 1570 | 0 | 1 | 99.94 | 100 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
232 | 0.00 | 1780 | 1782 | 1780 | 2 | 0 | 100 | 99.89 | 0.00 | 1.68 |
233 | –5.56 | 3079 | 3076 | 3076 | 0 | 3 | 99.90 | 100 | 0.00 | 16.33 |
234 | 0.00 | 2753 | 2752 | 2752 | 0 | 1 | 99.96 | 100 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
Total | 109,494 | 109,491 | 109,249 | 242 | 245 | 99.78 | 99.78 | 0.44 | 8.35 | |
TB: total beats annotated; DB: detected beats by algorithm; TD: Group time delay between TB and DB; TP: true positive, the number of correctly detected R-peaks; FP: false positive, the number of false detected R-peaks; FN: false negative, the number of undetected R-peaks; Se: sensitivity; PPV: positive prediction value; DER: detection error rate; ADE: annotated-detected error. |
File | TD(ms) | TB | DB | TP | FP | FN | Se(%) | PPV(%) | DER(%) | ADE(ms) |
100 | 44.44 | 2273 | 2271 | 2271 | 0 | 2 | 99.91 | 100 | 0.00 | 25.01 |
101 | 30.56 | 1865 | 1868 | 1863 | 5 | 2 | 99.89 | 99.73 | 0.00 | 13.98 |
102 | 22.22 | 2187 | 2187 | 2187 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 18.24 |
103 | 36.11 | 2084 | 2080 | 2079 | 1 | 5 | 99.76 | 99.95 | 0.00 | 16.79 |
104 | 16.67 | 2229 | 2273 | 2221 | 52 | 8 | 99.64 | 97.71 | 0.03 | 21.90 |
105 | 0.00 | 2572 | 2599 | 2561 | 38 | 11 | 99.57 | 98.54 | 0.02 | 18.40 |
106 | 25.00 | 2027 | 1996 | 1995 | 1 | 32 | 98.42 | 99.95 | 0.02 | 23.96 |
107 | 50.00 | 2137 | 2135 | 2135 | 0 | 2 | 99.91 | 100 | 0.00 | 26.49 |
108 | 19.44 | 1763 | 1872 | 1281 | 591 | 482 | 72.66 | 68.43 | 0.61 | 43.72 |
109 | 25.00 | 2532 | 2528 | 2527 | 1 | 5 | 99.80 | 99.96 | 0.00 | 24.43 |
111 | 25.00 | 2124 | 2125 | 2123 | 2 | 1 | 99.95 | 99.91 | 0.00 | 21.21 |
112 | 36.11 | 2539 | 2539 | 2539 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 32.70 |
113 | 44.44 | 1795 | 1794 | 1793 | 1 | 2 | 99.89 | 99.94 | 0.00 | 24.20 |
114 | 47.22 | 1879 | 1882 | 1876 | 6 | 3 | 99.84 | 99.68 | 0.00 | 15.68 |
115 | 38.89 | 1953 | 1953 | 1952 | 1 | 1 | 99.95 | 99.95 | 0.00 | 10.89 |
116 | 30.56 | 2412 | 2391 | 2387 | 4 | 25 | 98.96 | 99.83 | 0.01 | 16.35 |
117 | 25.00 | 1535 | 1535 | 1533 | 2 | 2 | 99.87 | 99.87 | 0.00 | 22.72 |
118 | 41.67 | 2278 | 2278 | 2274 | 4 | 4 | 99.82 | 99.82 | 0.00 | 25.16 |
119 | 30.56 | 1987 | 1988 | 1986 | 2 | 1 | 99.95 | 99.90 | 0.00 | 25.33 |
121 | 16.67 | 1863 | 1864 | 1858 | 6 | 5 | 99.73 | 99.68 | 0.01 | 23.31 |
122 | 2.78 | 2476 | 2476 | 2475 | 1 | 1 | 99.96 | 99.96 | 0.00 | 15.93 |
123 | 52.78 | 1518 | 1515 | 1513 | 2 | 5 | 99.67 | 99.87 | 0.00 | 18.09 |
124 | 8.33 | 1619 | 1620 | 1619 | 1 | 0 | 100 | 99.94 | 0.00 | 21.26 |
200 | 33.33 | 2601 | 2603 | 2596 | 7 | 5 | 99.81 | 99.73 | 0.00 | 22.39 |
201 | 33.33 | 1963 | 1912 | 1912 | 0 | 51 | 97.40 | 100 | 0.03 | 18.87 |
202 | 22.22 | 2136 | 2128 | 2127 | 1 | 9 | 99.58 | 99.95 | 0.00 | 15.54 |
203 | 19.44 | 2980 | 2957 | 2924 | 33 | 57 | 98.09 | 98.88 | 0.03 | 22.66 |
205 | 25.00 | 2656 | 2649 | 2648 | 1 | 8 | 99.70 | 99.96 | 0.00 | 14.22 |
207 | 36.11 | 1860 | 1919 | 1826 | 93 | 34 | 98.17 | 95.15 | 0.07 | 24.20 |
208 | 38.89 | 2955 | 2658 | 2654 | 4 | 301 | 89.81 | 99.85 | 0.10 | 28.16 |
209 | 41.67 | 3005 | 3005 | 3003 | 2 | 2 | 99.93 | 99.93 | 0.00 | 20.36 |
210 | 27.78 | 2650 | 2607 | 2603 | 4 | 47 | 98.23 | 99.85 | 0.02 | 15.29 |
212 | 13.89 | 2748 | 2749 | 2748 | 1 | 0 | 100 | 99.96 | 0.00 | 18.92 |
213 | 16.67 | 3251 | 3249 | 3249 | 0 | 2 | 99.94 | 100 | 0.00 | 26.62 |
214 | 22.22 | 2262 | 2255 | 2253 | 2 | 9 | 99.60 | 99.91 | 0.00 | 14.22 |
215 | 47.22 | 3363 | 3363 | 3362 | 1 | 1 | 99.97 | 99.97 | 0.00 | 19.16 |
217 | 41.67 | 2208 | 2205 | 2202 | 3 | 6 | 99.73 | 99.86 | 0.00 | 25.10 |
219 | 33.33 | 2154 | 2152 | 2150 | 2 | 4 | 99.81 | 99.91 | 0.00 | 17.94 |
220 | 38.89 | 2048 | 2048 | 2046 | 2 | 2 | 99.90 | 99.90 | 0.00 | 17.17 |
221 | 38.89 | 2427 | 2361 | 2360 | 1 | 67 | 97.24 | 99.96 | 0.03 | 21.64 |
222 | 19.44 | 2483 | 2488 | 2483 | 5 | 0 | 100 | 99.80 | 0.00 | 15.72 |
223 | 33.33 | 2605 | 2603 | 2602 | 1 | 3 | 99.88 | 99.96 | 0.00 | 29.88 |
228 | 19.44 | 2053 | 2080 | 2045 | 35 | 8 | 99.61 | 98.32 | 0.02 | 20.37 |
230 | 50.00 | 2256 | 2255 | 2255 | 0 | 1 | 99.96 | 100 | 0.00 | 15.21 |
231 | 41.67 | 1571 | 1569 | 1568 | 1 | 3 | 99.81 | 99.94 | 0.00 | 29.59 |
232 | 44.44 | 1780 | 1790 | 1776 | 14 | 4 | 99.78 | 99.22 | 0.01 | 25.12 |
233 | 22.22 | 3079 | 3072 | 3072 | 0 | 7 | 99.77 | 100 | 0.00 | 19.89 |
234 | 19.44 | 2753 | 2750 | 2750 | 0 | 3 | 99.89 | 100 | 0.00 | 11.04 |
Total | 109,494 | 109,196 | 108,262 | 934 | 1233 | 98.87 | 99.14 | 1.98 | 21.65 |
Pan-Tompkins Algorithm | Proposed Algorithm | |||||||
Tolerance | Se(%) | PPV(%) | DER(%) | ADE(ms) | Se(%) | PPV(%) | DER(%) | ADE(ms) |
150 ms | 98.87 | 99.14 | 1.98 | 21.65 | 99.78 | 99.78 | 0.44 | 8.35 |
25 ms | 79.41 | 79.63 | 40.90 | 13.37 | 96.82 | 96.82 | 6.36 | 3.17 |
2.78 ms | 11.85 | 11.88 | 176.03 | 2.42 | 86.18 | 86.18 | 27.64 | 1.86 |
Note: TB: total beats annotated; Se: sensitivity; PPV: positive prediction value; DER: detection error rate; ADE: annotated-detected error. |
Method | TB | Se(%) | PPV(%) | DER(%) | ADE(ms) |
Proposed | 109,494 | 99.78 | 99.78 | 0.44 | 8.35 |
Kai Zhao et al. [32] | 109,966 | 99.81 | 99.88 | 0.31 | 12.2 |
* Pan and Tompkins [33] | 109,966 | 99.13 | 99.63 | 1.24 | 13.4 |
* Indicates that the data is quoted from literature [32]. |
File | ADE(ms) | TB | N | V | / | Q | F | f | S |
122 | 1.12 | 2476 | 2476 | ||||||
115 | 1.19 | 1953 | 1953 | ||||||
104 | 16.75 | 2229 | 163 | 2 | 1380 | 18 | 1 | 666 | |
208 | 24.96 | 2955 | 1586 | 992 | 2 | 373 | 2 | ||
Note: normal beats; V: beats of premature ventricular contract; /: paced beats; f: fusion of paced and normal beats; Q: Unclassifiable beats; F: fusion of ventricular and normal beats; S: supraventricular premature beats. |
File | TD(ms) | TB | DB | TP | FP | FN | Se(%) | PPV(%) | DER(%) | ADE(ms) |
100 | 0.00 | 2273 | 2273 | 2273 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 2.21 |
101 | 0.00 | 1865 | 1865 | 1862 | 3 | 3 | 99.84 | 99.84 | 0.00 | 2.53 |
102 | 0.00 | 2187 | 2187 | 2187 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 10.80 |
103 | 0.00 | 2084 | 2083 | 2083 | 0 | 1 | 99.95 | 100 | 0.00 | 2.32 |
104 | 0.00 | 2229 | 2237 | 2228 | 9 | 1 | 99.96 | 99.60 | 0.00 | 16.75 |
105 | 0.00 | 2572 | 2590 | 2557 | 33 | 15 | 99.42 | 98.73 | 0.02 | 9.54 |
106 | 0.00 | 2027 | 2021 | 2020 | 1 | 7 | 99.65 | 99.95 | 0.00 | 5.30 |
107 | –2.78 | 2137 | 2136 | 2135 | 1 | 2 | 99.91 | 99.95 | 0.00 | 7.47 |
108 | 2.78 | 1763 | 1758 | 1754 | 4 | 9 | 99.49 | 99.77 | 0.01 | 14.95 |
109 | –2.78 | 2532 | 2530 | 2530 | 0 | 2 | 99.92 | 100 | 0.00 | 5.08 |
111 | 0.00 | 2124 | 2123 | 2123 | 0 | 1 | 99.95 | 100 | 0.00 | 5.78 |
112 | 0.00 | 2539 | 2539 | 2539 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 2.14 |
113 | 0.00 | 1795 | 1795 | 1795 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.93 |
114 | 30.56 | 1879 | 1880 | 1876 | 4 | 3 | 99.84 | 99.79 | 0.00 | 8.02 |
115 | 2.78 | 1953 | 1953 | 1953 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.12 |
116 | 0.00 | 2412 | 2390 | 2387 | 3 | 25 | 98.96 | 99.87 | 0.01 | 2.91 |
117 | –19.44 | 1535 | 1535 | 1535 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 6.97 |
118 | 0.00 | 2278 | 2278 | 2278 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 3.15 |
119 | 0.00 | 1987 | 1988 | 1987 | 1 | 0 | 100 | 99.95 | 0.00 | 6.00 |
121 | –2.78 | 1863 | 1861 | 1861 | 0 | 2 | 99.89 | 100 | 0.00 | 2.26 |
122 | 0.00 | 2476 | 2476 | 2476 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.19 |
123 | 0.00 | 1518 | 1518 | 1518 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.82 |
124 | 0.00 | 1619 | 1619 | 1619 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 6.99 |
200 | –5.56 | 2601 | 2601 | 2599 | 2 | 2 | 99.92 | 99.92 | 0.00 | 17.64 |
201 | 0.00 | 1963 | 1942 | 1942 | 0 | 21 | 98.93 | 100 | 0.01 | 4.15 |
202 | 0.00 | 2136 | 2122 | 2122 | 0 | 14 | 99.34 | 100 | 0.01 | 2.47 |
203 | –5.56 | 2980 | 2954 | 2937 | 17 | 43 | 98.56 | 99.42 | 0.02 | 15.28 |
205 | 0.00 | 2656 | 2648 | 2648 | 0 | 8 | 99.70 | 100 | 0.00 | 5.27 |
207 | 0.00 | 1860 | 1991 | 1852 | 139 | 8 | 99.57 | 93.02 | 0.08 | 12.98 |
208 | 8.33 | 2955 | 2939 | 2936 | 3 | 19 | 99.36 | 99.90 | 0.01 | 24.96 |
209 | 0.00 | 3005 | 3005 | 3005 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.54 |
210 | 0.00 | 2650 | 2623 | 2621 | 2 | 29 | 98.91 | 99.92 | 0.01 | 7.34 |
212 | 0.00 | 2748 | 2748 | 2748 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 2.24 |
213 | 0.00 | 3251 | 3248 | 3248 | 0 | 3 | 99.91 | 100 | 0.00 | 5.78 |
214 | 0.00 | 2262 | 2258 | 2258 | 0 | 4 | 99.82 | 100 | 0.00 | 4.60 |
215 | 0.00 | 3363 | 3359 | 3359 | 0 | 4 | 99.88 | 100 | 0.00 | 3.18 |
217 | –13.89 | 2208 | 2205 | 2204 | 1 | 4 | 99.82 | 99.95 | 0.00 | 8.09 |
219 | 0.00 | 2154 | 2154 | 2154 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.46 |
220 | 2.78 | 2048 | 2048 | 2048 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.82 |
221 | 0.00 | 2427 | 2425 | 2425 | 0 | 2 | 99.92 | 100 | 0.00 | 2.65 |
222 | 0.00 | 2483 | 2485 | 2483 | 2 | 0 | 100 | 99.92 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
223 | 0.00 | 2605 | 2603 | 2603 | 0 | 2 | 99.92 | 100 | 0.00 | 7.61 |
228 | 0.00 | 2053 | 2062 | 2047 | 15 | 6 | 99.71 | 99.27 | 0.01 | 5.69 |
230 | 2.78 | 2256 | 2256 | 2256 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 1.64 |
231 | 0.00 | 1571 | 1570 | 1570 | 0 | 1 | 99.94 | 100 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
232 | 0.00 | 1780 | 1782 | 1780 | 2 | 0 | 100 | 99.89 | 0.00 | 1.68 |
233 | –5.56 | 3079 | 3076 | 3076 | 0 | 3 | 99.90 | 100 | 0.00 | 16.33 |
234 | 0.00 | 2753 | 2752 | 2752 | 0 | 1 | 99.96 | 100 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
Total | 109,494 | 109,491 | 109,249 | 242 | 245 | 99.78 | 99.78 | 0.44 | 8.35 | |
TB: total beats annotated; DB: detected beats by algorithm; TD: Group time delay between TB and DB; TP: true positive, the number of correctly detected R-peaks; FP: false positive, the number of false detected R-peaks; FN: false negative, the number of undetected R-peaks; Se: sensitivity; PPV: positive prediction value; DER: detection error rate; ADE: annotated-detected error. |
File | TD(ms) | TB | DB | TP | FP | FN | Se(%) | PPV(%) | DER(%) | ADE(ms) |
100 | 44.44 | 2273 | 2271 | 2271 | 0 | 2 | 99.91 | 100 | 0.00 | 25.01 |
101 | 30.56 | 1865 | 1868 | 1863 | 5 | 2 | 99.89 | 99.73 | 0.00 | 13.98 |
102 | 22.22 | 2187 | 2187 | 2187 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 18.24 |
103 | 36.11 | 2084 | 2080 | 2079 | 1 | 5 | 99.76 | 99.95 | 0.00 | 16.79 |
104 | 16.67 | 2229 | 2273 | 2221 | 52 | 8 | 99.64 | 97.71 | 0.03 | 21.90 |
105 | 0.00 | 2572 | 2599 | 2561 | 38 | 11 | 99.57 | 98.54 | 0.02 | 18.40 |
106 | 25.00 | 2027 | 1996 | 1995 | 1 | 32 | 98.42 | 99.95 | 0.02 | 23.96 |
107 | 50.00 | 2137 | 2135 | 2135 | 0 | 2 | 99.91 | 100 | 0.00 | 26.49 |
108 | 19.44 | 1763 | 1872 | 1281 | 591 | 482 | 72.66 | 68.43 | 0.61 | 43.72 |
109 | 25.00 | 2532 | 2528 | 2527 | 1 | 5 | 99.80 | 99.96 | 0.00 | 24.43 |
111 | 25.00 | 2124 | 2125 | 2123 | 2 | 1 | 99.95 | 99.91 | 0.00 | 21.21 |
112 | 36.11 | 2539 | 2539 | 2539 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 32.70 |
113 | 44.44 | 1795 | 1794 | 1793 | 1 | 2 | 99.89 | 99.94 | 0.00 | 24.20 |
114 | 47.22 | 1879 | 1882 | 1876 | 6 | 3 | 99.84 | 99.68 | 0.00 | 15.68 |
115 | 38.89 | 1953 | 1953 | 1952 | 1 | 1 | 99.95 | 99.95 | 0.00 | 10.89 |
116 | 30.56 | 2412 | 2391 | 2387 | 4 | 25 | 98.96 | 99.83 | 0.01 | 16.35 |
117 | 25.00 | 1535 | 1535 | 1533 | 2 | 2 | 99.87 | 99.87 | 0.00 | 22.72 |
118 | 41.67 | 2278 | 2278 | 2274 | 4 | 4 | 99.82 | 99.82 | 0.00 | 25.16 |
119 | 30.56 | 1987 | 1988 | 1986 | 2 | 1 | 99.95 | 99.90 | 0.00 | 25.33 |
121 | 16.67 | 1863 | 1864 | 1858 | 6 | 5 | 99.73 | 99.68 | 0.01 | 23.31 |
122 | 2.78 | 2476 | 2476 | 2475 | 1 | 1 | 99.96 | 99.96 | 0.00 | 15.93 |
123 | 52.78 | 1518 | 1515 | 1513 | 2 | 5 | 99.67 | 99.87 | 0.00 | 18.09 |
124 | 8.33 | 1619 | 1620 | 1619 | 1 | 0 | 100 | 99.94 | 0.00 | 21.26 |
200 | 33.33 | 2601 | 2603 | 2596 | 7 | 5 | 99.81 | 99.73 | 0.00 | 22.39 |
201 | 33.33 | 1963 | 1912 | 1912 | 0 | 51 | 97.40 | 100 | 0.03 | 18.87 |
202 | 22.22 | 2136 | 2128 | 2127 | 1 | 9 | 99.58 | 99.95 | 0.00 | 15.54 |
203 | 19.44 | 2980 | 2957 | 2924 | 33 | 57 | 98.09 | 98.88 | 0.03 | 22.66 |
205 | 25.00 | 2656 | 2649 | 2648 | 1 | 8 | 99.70 | 99.96 | 0.00 | 14.22 |
207 | 36.11 | 1860 | 1919 | 1826 | 93 | 34 | 98.17 | 95.15 | 0.07 | 24.20 |
208 | 38.89 | 2955 | 2658 | 2654 | 4 | 301 | 89.81 | 99.85 | 0.10 | 28.16 |
209 | 41.67 | 3005 | 3005 | 3003 | 2 | 2 | 99.93 | 99.93 | 0.00 | 20.36 |
210 | 27.78 | 2650 | 2607 | 2603 | 4 | 47 | 98.23 | 99.85 | 0.02 | 15.29 |
212 | 13.89 | 2748 | 2749 | 2748 | 1 | 0 | 100 | 99.96 | 0.00 | 18.92 |
213 | 16.67 | 3251 | 3249 | 3249 | 0 | 2 | 99.94 | 100 | 0.00 | 26.62 |
214 | 22.22 | 2262 | 2255 | 2253 | 2 | 9 | 99.60 | 99.91 | 0.00 | 14.22 |
215 | 47.22 | 3363 | 3363 | 3362 | 1 | 1 | 99.97 | 99.97 | 0.00 | 19.16 |
217 | 41.67 | 2208 | 2205 | 2202 | 3 | 6 | 99.73 | 99.86 | 0.00 | 25.10 |
219 | 33.33 | 2154 | 2152 | 2150 | 2 | 4 | 99.81 | 99.91 | 0.00 | 17.94 |
220 | 38.89 | 2048 | 2048 | 2046 | 2 | 2 | 99.90 | 99.90 | 0.00 | 17.17 |
221 | 38.89 | 2427 | 2361 | 2360 | 1 | 67 | 97.24 | 99.96 | 0.03 | 21.64 |
222 | 19.44 | 2483 | 2488 | 2483 | 5 | 0 | 100 | 99.80 | 0.00 | 15.72 |
223 | 33.33 | 2605 | 2603 | 2602 | 1 | 3 | 99.88 | 99.96 | 0.00 | 29.88 |
228 | 19.44 | 2053 | 2080 | 2045 | 35 | 8 | 99.61 | 98.32 | 0.02 | 20.37 |
230 | 50.00 | 2256 | 2255 | 2255 | 0 | 1 | 99.96 | 100 | 0.00 | 15.21 |
231 | 41.67 | 1571 | 1569 | 1568 | 1 | 3 | 99.81 | 99.94 | 0.00 | 29.59 |
232 | 44.44 | 1780 | 1790 | 1776 | 14 | 4 | 99.78 | 99.22 | 0.01 | 25.12 |
233 | 22.22 | 3079 | 3072 | 3072 | 0 | 7 | 99.77 | 100 | 0.00 | 19.89 |
234 | 19.44 | 2753 | 2750 | 2750 | 0 | 3 | 99.89 | 100 | 0.00 | 11.04 |
Total | 109,494 | 109,196 | 108,262 | 934 | 1233 | 98.87 | 99.14 | 1.98 | 21.65 |