We analyzed the dynamics of the relatively elusive concept of economic resilience. Resilience and its two distinctive components, adaptability and resistance to shocks, are concepts that conveniently characterize the structure of economies in the long-run. In studying resilience, we established a relationship between the short-run and long-run dynamics, or from a macroeconomic perspective, between transitional dynamics and long-run growth. The loss or gain of systemic resilience is usually gradual and, to a large extent, reversible: over time, resilience may fluctuate. We extended previous analyses by studying the resilience of an economic system over several short-run periods corresponding to the distinct phases of the business cycle. We articulated these periods in a backward sequence of overlapping long-run periods that allowed us to compute the adaptability and resistance indexes, even if they were originally designed to measure resilience in the long-term. Unlike other studies that measured it using flow variables such as (un)employment or income, we used capital stock to measure the attributes of adaptability and resistance. The dynamics of aggregate capital reflect much better the evolution of the size and complexity of the economy and also allowed us to subdivide adaptability into its depreciation and investment components. Our case study was the Spanish economy during the period 1964–2016, encompassing different subperiods of expansion, slowdown, and crisis. We identified a reference point of perfect resilience, and found that the most resilient subperiod corresponds to the years of expansion 1994–2007. The least resistent subperiod is 1974–1985, showing strong slowdown and crisis. The least adaptable subperiod is 1986–1991. Adaptability was mostly stable during expansions and recessions, and was perfect during the most resilient subperiod. The depreciation effect mimicked the adaptability pattern better than investment. Resistance did not show a clear pro- or counter-cyclical pattern.
Citation: María-José Murgui-García, Jose-Ramon Ruiz-Tamarit. Economic resilience in the short-run: A dynamic macroeconomic approach[J]. National Accounting Review, 2025, 7(3): 290-308. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2025013
We analyzed the dynamics of the relatively elusive concept of economic resilience. Resilience and its two distinctive components, adaptability and resistance to shocks, are concepts that conveniently characterize the structure of economies in the long-run. In studying resilience, we established a relationship between the short-run and long-run dynamics, or from a macroeconomic perspective, between transitional dynamics and long-run growth. The loss or gain of systemic resilience is usually gradual and, to a large extent, reversible: over time, resilience may fluctuate. We extended previous analyses by studying the resilience of an economic system over several short-run periods corresponding to the distinct phases of the business cycle. We articulated these periods in a backward sequence of overlapping long-run periods that allowed us to compute the adaptability and resistance indexes, even if they were originally designed to measure resilience in the long-term. Unlike other studies that measured it using flow variables such as (un)employment or income, we used capital stock to measure the attributes of adaptability and resistance. The dynamics of aggregate capital reflect much better the evolution of the size and complexity of the economy and also allowed us to subdivide adaptability into its depreciation and investment components. Our case study was the Spanish economy during the period 1964–2016, encompassing different subperiods of expansion, slowdown, and crisis. We identified a reference point of perfect resilience, and found that the most resilient subperiod corresponds to the years of expansion 1994–2007. The least resistent subperiod is 1974–1985, showing strong slowdown and crisis. The least adaptable subperiod is 1986–1991. Adaptability was mostly stable during expansions and recessions, and was perfect during the most resilient subperiod. The depreciation effect mimicked the adaptability pattern better than investment. Resistance did not show a clear pro- or counter-cyclical pattern.
| [1] | Batabyal AA (1998) The concept of resilience: Retrospect and prospect. Environ Dev Econ 3: 235–239. |
| [2] | Becker P (2014) Sustainability science. Managing risk and resilience for sustainable development. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. |
| [3] |
Briguglio L, Cordina G, Farrugia N, et al. (2008) Economic vulnerability and resilience: Concepts and measurements. Oxf Dev Stud 37: 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810903089893 doi: 10.1080/13600810903089893
|
| [4] | Caldera-Sánchez A, de Serres A, Gori F, et al. (2016) Strengthening economic resilience: Insights from the post-1970 record of severe recessions and financial crises. OECD Economic Policy Paper No. 20, OECD Publishing, Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.1787/6b748a4b-en |
| [5] | Dasgupta P (1995) The population problem: Theory and evidence. J Econ Lit 33: 1879–1902. |
| [6] |
Ehrlich PR, Kareiva PM, Daily GC (2012) Securing natural capital and expanding equity to rescale civilization. Nature 486: 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11157 doi: 10.1038/nature11157
|
| [7] |
Escribá-Pérez FJ, Murgui-García MJ, Ruiz-Tamarit JR (2018) Economic and statistical measurement of physical capital: from theory to practice. Econ Model 75: 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.06.023 doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2018.06.023
|
| [8] |
Escribá-Pérez FJ, Murgui-García MJ, Ruiz-Tamarit JR (2022) The devil is in the details: Capital stock estimation and aggregate productivity growth—An application to the Spanish economy. Port Econ J 21: 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-020-00187-z doi: 10.1007/s10258-020-00187-z
|
| [9] |
Escribá-Pérez FJ, Murgui-García MJ, Ruiz-Tamarit JR (2023) Endogenous capital stock and depreciation in the United States. J Public Econ Theory 25: 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12582 doi: 10.1111/jpet.12582
|
| [10] |
Escribá-Pérez FJ, Murgui-García MJ, Ruiz-Tamarit JR (2024) Economic resilience and the dynamics of capital stock. Macroecon Dyn 29: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100524000208 doi: 10.1017/S1365100524000208
|
| [11] |
Fingleton B, Garretsen H, Martin R (2012) Recessionary shocks and regional employment: evidence on the resilience of U.K. regions. J Reg Sci 52: 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00755.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00755.x
|
| [12] | Hallegate S (2014) Economic resilience: definition and measurement. Policy Research working paper; no. WPS 6852 Washington, DC: World Bank Group. |
| [13] | Hanley N (1998) Resilience in social and economic systems: a concept that fails the cost-benefit test? Environ Dev Econ 3: 244–249. |
| [14] | Hill EW, Wial H, Wolman H (2008) Exploring regional economic resilience. Working Paper No. 2008–04, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.5099.4000 |
| [15] |
Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability in ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
|
| [16] | Levin SA, Barrett S, Aniyar S, et al. (1998) Resilience in natural and socioeconomic systems. Environ Dev Econ 3: 222–235. |
| [17] |
Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, et al. (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317: 1513–1516. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.114400 doi: 10.1126/science.114400
|
| [18] | Martin R (2012) Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks. J Econ Geogr 12: 1–32. |
| [19] |
Martin R, Sunley P (2015) On the notion of regional economic resilience: conceptualization and explanation. J Econ Geogr 15: 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu015. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbu015
|
| [20] |
Pimm SL (1984) The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature 307: 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1038/307321a0 doi: 10.1038/307321a0
|
| [21] |
Simmie J, Martin R (2010) The economic resilience of regions: towards an evolutionary approach. Camb J Regions Econ Soc 3: 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsp029 doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
|