Citation: Yanyun Zhao, Bingjie Liu. The evolution and new trends of China's tourism industry[J]. National Accounting Review, 2020, 2(4): 337-353. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2020020
[1] | Mehmet Kunt, Artion Kashuri, Tingsong Du, Abdul Wakil Baidar . Quantum Montgomery identity and quantum estimates of Ostrowski type inequalities. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 5439-5457. doi: 10.3934/math.2020349 |
[2] | Marwa M. Tharwat, Marwa M. Ahmed, Ammara Nosheen, Khuram Ali Khan, Iram Shahzadi, Dumitru Baleanu, Ahmed A. El-Deeb . Dynamic inequalities of Grüss, Ostrowski and Trapezoid type via diamond-α integrals and Montgomery identity. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 12778-12799. doi: 10.3934/math.2024624 |
[3] | Atiqe Ur Rahman, Khuram Ali Khan, Ammara Nosheen, Muhammad Saeed, Thongchai Botmart, Nehad Ali Shah . Weighted Ostrowski type inequalities via Montgomery identity involving double integrals on time scales. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 16657-16672. doi: 10.3934/math.2022913 |
[4] | Bandar Bin-Mohsin, Muhammad Uzair Awan, Muhammad Zakria Javed, Sadia Talib, Hüseyin Budak, Muhammad Aslam Noor, Khalida Inayat Noor . On some classical integral inequalities in the setting of new post quantum integrals. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1995-2017. doi: 10.3934/math.2023103 |
[5] | Humaira Kalsoom, Muhammad Amer Latif, Muhammad Idrees, Muhammad Arif, Zabidin Salleh . Quantum Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for generalized strongly preinvex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(12): 13291-13310. doi: 10.3934/math.2021769 |
[6] | Da Shi, Ghulam Farid, Abd Elmotaleb A. M. A. Elamin, Wajida Akram, Abdullah A. Alahmari, B. A. Younis . Generalizations of some q-integral inequalities of Hölder, Ostrowski and Grüss type. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 23459-23471. doi: 10.3934/math.20231192 |
[7] | Humaira Kalsoom, Muhammad Idrees, Artion Kashuri, Muhammad Uzair Awan, Yu-Ming Chu . Some New (p1p2,q1q2)-Estimates of Ostrowski-type integral inequalities via n-polynomials s-type convexity. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 7122-7144. doi: 10.3934/math.2020456 |
[8] | Muhammad Amer Latif, Mehmet Kunt, Sever Silvestru Dragomir, İmdat İşcan . Post-quantum trapezoid type inequalities. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 4011-4026. doi: 10.3934/math.2020258 |
[9] | Mustafa Gürbüz, Yakup Taşdan, Erhan Set . Ostrowski type inequalities via the Katugampola fractional integrals. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 42-53. doi: 10.3934/math.2020004 |
[10] | Miguel Vivas-Cortez, Muhammad Aamir Ali, Hüseyin Budak, Ifra Bashir Sial . Post-quantum Ostrowski type integral inequalities for functions of two variables. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8035-8063. doi: 10.3934/math.2022448 |
In [4] the authors obtained the following generalization of Montgomery identity for quantum calculus.
Lemma 1. [4] (Quantum Montgomery identity) Let f:[a,b]→R, be an arbitrary function with daqf quantum integrable on [a,b], then the following quantum identity holds:
f(x)−1b−ab∫af(t)daqt=(b−a)1∫0Kq,x(t)Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)d0qt | (1.1) |
where Kq,x(t) is defined by
Kq,x(t)={qt,0≤t≤x−ab−a,qt−1,x−ab−a<t≤1. | (1.2) |
Using this identity, the authors have obtained two Ostrowski type inequalities for quantum integrals and applied it in several special cases.
Unfortunately, in the proof of this lemma an error is made when calculating the integrals involving the kernel Kq,x(t) on the interval [x−ab−a,1]. Also, in the proofs of Theorem 3 and Theorem 4 a small mistake related to the convexity of |Daqf|r is made.
In the present paper we prove that the identity (1.1) and, thus, all of the consequent results are incorrect and provide corrections for these results.
The q-derivative of a function f:[a,b]→R for q∈⟨0,1⟩ (see [5] or [2] for a=0) is given by
Daqf(x)=f(x)−f(a+q(x−a))(1−q)(x−a),forx∈⟨a,b]Daqf(a)=limx→aDaqf(x) |
We say that f:[a,b]→R is q-differentiable if limx→aDaqf(x) exists. The q-derivative is a discretization of the ordinary derivative and if f is a differentiable function then ([1,3])
limq→1 Daqf(x)=f′(x). |
Further, the q-integral of f is defined by
x∫af(t)daqt=(1−q)(x−a)∞∑k=0qkf(a+qk(x−a)), x∈[a,b]. |
If the series on the right hand-side is convergent, then the q-integral ∫xaf(t)daqt exists and f:[a,b]→R is said to be q-integrable on [a,x]. If f is continuous on [a,b] the series (1−q)(x−a)∞∑k=0qkf(a+qk(x−a)) tends to the Riemann integral of f as q→1 ([1], [3])
limq→1x∫af(t)daqt=x∫af(t)dt. |
If c∈⟨a,x⟩ the q-integral is defined by
x∫cf(t)daqt=x∫af(t)daqt−c∫af(t)daqt. |
Obviously, the q-integral depends on the values of f at the points outside the interval of integration and an important difference between the definite q-integral and Riemann integral is that even if we are integrating a function over the interval [c,x], a<c<x<b, for q-integral we have to take into account its behavior at t=a as well as its values on [a,x]. This is the main reason for mistakes made in [4] since in the proof of Lemma 1 the following error was made:
1∫x−ab−aKq,x(t)Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)d0qt=1∫0(qt−1)Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)d0qt−x−ab−a∫0(qt−1)Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)d0qt. |
But Kq,x(t)≠(qt−1) for t∈[0,1] or for t∈[0,x−ab−a], so the equality does not hold.
Now, we give a proof that the quantum Montgomery identity (1.1) is not correct, since it does not hold for all x∈[a,b]. As we shall see, the identity (1.1) is valid only if x=a+qm+1(b−a) for some m∈N∪{0}. We have
(b−a)1∫0Kq,x(t)Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)d0qt=(b−a)(1−q)∞∑k=0qkKq,x(qk)Daqf(a+qk(b−a)). |
For q∈⟨0,1⟩ let m∈N∪{0} be such that
qm+1≤x−ab−a<qm, |
in other words
m=⌈logqx−ab−a⌉−1. |
Then
Kq,x(qk)={qk+1−1,k≤m,qk+1,k≥m+1, |
and
(b−a)(1−q)∞∑k=0qkKq,x(qk)Daqf(a+qk(b−a))=(b−a)(1−q)(m∑k=0qk(qk+1−1)f(a+qk(b−a))−f(a+qk+1(b−a))(1−q)qk(b−a)+∞∑k=m+1qk(qk+1)f(a+qk(b−a))−f(a+qk+1(b−a))(1−q)qk(b−a))=−m∑k=0(f(a+qk(b−a))−f(a+qk+1(b−a)))+∞∑k=0qk+1(f(a+qk(b−a))−f(a+qk+1(b−a)))=f(a+qm+1(b−a))−f(b)+∞∑k=0qk+1(f(a+qk(b−a))−f(a+qk+1(b−a))). |
If we put S=∞∑k=0qkf(a+qk(b−a))=1(1−q)(b−a)b∫af(t)daqt, we have
∞∑k=0(qk+1)(f(a+qk(b−a))−f(a+qk+1(b−a)))=qS−(S−f(b)) |
and
1b−ab∫af(t)daqt+(b−a)1∫0Kq,x(t)Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)d0qt=1b−ab∫af(t)daqt+(f(a+qm+1(b−a))−f(b))+qS−(S−f(b))=(1−q)S+f(a+qm+1(b−a))−f(b)+qS−S+f(b)=f(a+qm+1(b−a)) |
which is obviously not equal to f(x), unless x=a+qm+1(b−a).
This is no surprise since Jackson integral takes into account only f(a+qk(x−a)) for k∈N∪{0}. Thus, we have proved the next lemma which is a corrected version of Lemma 1 from [4].
Lemma 2. (Quantum Montgomery identity) Let f:[a,b]→R, be an arbitrary function with Daqf quantum integrable on [a,b], then for all x∈⟨a,b⟩ the following quantum identity holds:
f(a+q⌈logqx−ab−a⌉(b−a))−1b−ab∫af(t)daqt=(b−a)1∫0Kq,x(t)Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)d0qt |
where Kq,x(t) is defined by
Kq,x(t)={qt,0≤t≤x−ab−a,qt−1,x−ab−a<t≤1. |
In Theorem 3 and Theorem 4 from [4] the authors have used the identity (1.1) to derive Ostrowski type inequalities for functions f for which Daqf is quantum integrable on [a,b] and |Daqf|r, r≥1 is a convex function. Since these inequalities depends on the validity of Lemma 1, our discussion invalidates all the results from [4].
More precisely, in all the inequalities an additional assumption x=a+qm(b−a) for some m∈N∪{0} should be added. In Theorems 3 and 4 |Daqf(a)|r and |Daqf(b)|r should be swapped, since in the proofs of Theorem 3 and Theorem 4, when applying the convexity of |Daqf|r the following mistake was made
|Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)|r≤t|Daqf(a)|r+(1−t)|Daqf(b)|r. |
Lastly, the integral K4(a,b,x,q) is incorrectly computed and should read:
K4(a,b,x,q)=1−q1+q(b−xb−a)+q1+q(b−xb−a)2. |
The main goal of this paper was to point out that some results in [4] are not correct. We have concentrated on Lemma 3 (Quantum Montgomery identity). The statement of that Lemma is not correct as we have shown. We also found and analyzed the mistake in the proof of Lemma 3.
However, we went one step further and stated and proved the correct version of Lemma 3 (it is Lemma 2 in our paper). We have also explained how can all inequalities derived from Quantum Montgomery identity be corrected.
Domagoj Kovačević was supported by the QuantiXLie Centre of Excellence, a project co financed by the Croatian Government and European Union through the European Regional Development Fund-the Competitiveness and Cohesion Operational Programme (Grant KK.01.1.1.01.0004).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
After our Correction was accepted we were contacted by the first author of [4], Professor Kunt, who suggested an alternate way to correct the results of [4].
The incorrect version of Montgomery identity from [4]
f(x)−1b−ab∫af(t)daqt=(b−a)1∫0Kq,x(t)Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)d0qt |
can be fixed in two ways: either by changing the left hand side or by changing the right hand side of this equation. In Lemma 2 we showed how to fix the identity by correcting the left hand side. This makes it easier to salvage the rest of results in [4], as all the results remain valid with the added assumption that x=a+qm(b−a) for some m∈N∪{0}.
Professor Kunt suggested correcting the right hand side of this equation to obtain the identity:
f(x)−1b−a∫baf(t)daqt=(b−a)[∫x−ab−a0qtDaqf(tb+(1−t)a)d0qt+∫1x−ab−a(qt−1)Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)d0qt]. (∗) |
By doing so, the proofs of all the remaining results have to be corrected as the bound used
|∫1x−ab−a(qt−1)Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)d0qt|≤∫1x−ab−a|(qt−1)Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)|d0qt |
does not hold for q-integrals in general. This is discussed, for example, on page 12 in [1,Section 1.3.1,Remark (ii)].
When x−ab−a=qm or equivalently x=a+qm(b−a) for some m∈N∪{0} the bound above does hold, which is why there is no need to change the rest of the results in [4] if one takes our approach. Nevertheless, we list below the results that can be obtained using identity (3.1). The results below are due to Professor Kunt.
Theorem 3 in [4] should be as follows:
Theorem 3. Let f:[a,b]→R be an arbitrary function with Daqf is quantum integrable on [a,b]. If |Daqf|r, r≥1 is a convex function, then the following quantum integral inequality holds:
|f(x)−1b−a∫baf(t)daqt|≤(b−a)[(11+q)1−1r[|Daqf(b)|r1(1+q)(1+q+q2)+|Daqf(a)|rq1+q+q2]1r+(x−ab−a)[|Daqf(b)|r(x−ab−a)11+q+|Daqf(a)|r(1−(x−ab−a)11+q)]1r] | (3.1) |
for all x∈[a,b].
Proof. Using convexity of |Daqf|r, we have that
|Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)|r≤t|Daqf(b)|r+(1−t)|Daqf(a)|r. | (3.2) |
By using (∗), quantum power mean inequality and (3.2), we have that
|f(x)−1b−a∫baf(t)daqt| | (3.3) |
=(b−a)|∫x−ab−a0qtDaqf(tb+(1−t)a)d0qt+∫1x−ab−a(qt−1)Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)d0qt|=(b−a)|∫10(qt−1)Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)d0qt+∫x−ab−a0Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)d0qt|≤(b−a)|∫10(qt−1)Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)d0qt|+|∫x−ab−a0Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)d0qt| |
≤(b−a)[∫10(1−qt)|Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)|d0qt+∫x−ab−a0|Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)|d0qt] |
≤(b−a)[(∫101−qtd0qt)1−1r(∫10(1−qt)|Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)|rd0qt)1r+(∫x−ab−a0d0qt)1−1r(∫x−ab−a0|Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)|rd0qt)1r]≤(b−a)[(∫10(1−qt)d0qt)1−1r×(|Daqf(b)|r∫10(1−qt)td0q+|Daqf(a)|r∫10(1−qt)(1−t)d0qt)1r+(∫x−ab−a0d0qt)1−1r×(|Daqf(b)|r∫x−ab−a0td0qt+|Daqf(a)|r∫x−ab−a0(1−t)d0qt)1r] |
On the other hand, calculating the following quantum integrals we have
∫10(1−qt)d0qt=(1−q)∞∑n=0qn(1−qn+1)=(1−q)[11−q−q1−q2]=11+q, | (3.4) |
∫10(1−qt)td0qt=(1−q)∞∑n=0qn[(1−qn+1)qn]=(1−q)[11−q2−q1−q3]=11+q−q1+q+q2=1(1+q)(1+q+q2), | (3.5) |
∫10(1−qt)(1−t)d0qt=∫101−qtd0qt−∫10(1−qt)td0qt=11+q−1(1+q)(1+q+q2)=q1+q+q2, | (3.6) |
∫x−ab−a0d0qt=(1−q)(x−ab−a)∞∑n=0qn=x−ab−a, | (3.7) |
∫x−ab−a0td0qt=(1−q)(x−ab−a)∞∑n=0qn(qn(x−ab−a))=(x−ab−a)211+q, | (3.8) |
∫x−ab−a0(1−t)d0qt=∫x−ab−a0d0qt−∫x−ab−a0td0qt=x−ab−a−(x−ab−a)211+q=(x−ab−a)[1−(x−ab−a)11+q]. | (3.9) |
Using (3.4)–(3.9) in (3.3), we have (3.1).
Theorem 4 in [4] should be as follows:
Theorem 4. Let f:[a,b]→R be an arbitrary function with Daqf is quantum integrable on [a,b]. If |Daqf|r, r>1 and 1r+1p=1 is convex function, then the following quantum integral inequality holds:
|f(x)−1b−a∫baf(t)daqt| | (3.10) |
≤(b−a)[(∫10(1−qt)pd0qt)1p(|Daqf(b)|r11+q+|Daqf(a)|rq1+q)1r+(x−ab−a)[|Daqf(b)|r(x−ab−a)11+q+|Daqf(a)|r(1−(x−ab−a)11+q)]1r] |
for all x∈[a,b].
Proof. By using (∗) and quantum Hölder inequality, we have
|f(x)−1b−a∫baf(t)daqt|≤(b−a)|∫10(qt−1)Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)d0qt|+|∫x−ab−a0Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)d0qt|≤(b−a)[∫10(1−qt)|Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)|d0qt+∫x−ab−a0|Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)|d0qt]≤(b−a)[(∫10(1−qt)pd0qt)1p(∫10|Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)|rd0qt)1r+(∫x−ab−a0d0qt)1p(∫x−ab−a0|Daqf(tb+(1−t)a)|rd0qt)1r]≤(b−a)[(∫10(1−qt)pd0qt)1p(∫10[t|Daqf(b)|r+(1−t)|Daqf(a)|r]d0qt)1r+(∫x−ab−a0d0qt)1p(∫x−ab−a0[t|Daqf(b)|r+(1−t)|Daqf(a)|r]d0qt)1r]≤(b−a)[(∫10(1−qt)pd0qt)1p(|Daqf(b)|r∫10td0qt+|Daqf(a)|r∫10(1−t)d0qt)1r+(∫x−ab−a0d0qt)1p(|Daqf(b)|r∫x−ab−a0td0qt+|Daqf(a)|r∫x−ab−a0(1−t)d0qt)1r]=(b−a)[(∫10(1−qt)pd0qt)1p(|Daqf(b)|r11+q+|Daqf(a)|rq1+q)1r+(x−ab−a)[|Daqf(b)|r(x−ab−a)11+q+|Daqf(a)|r(1−(x−ab−a)11+q)]1r]. |
We conclude this section by noting that the bounds obtained in the original paper [4] which, as we have previously shown, do hold with the added assumption x=a+qm(b−a) for some m∈N∪{0}, are tighter than the bounds obtained above by Professor Kunt. Professor Kunt's bounds, however, hold for all x∈[a,b].
[1] | Chen XL (2011) Civilians, Smooth and Equal Development of Tourism Services Industry-Interview with Dean of China Tourism Research Academy. Economy, 18-19. |
[2] | China National Tourism Administration (2015) China Tourism Statistics Bulletin in 2015. Available from: http://www.cnta.gov.cn/zwgk/lysj/201610/t20161018_786774.shtml. |
[3] | China National Tourism Administration (2017) Ching Ming Holiday Tourism Market Information in 2017. Available from: http://www.cnta.gov.cn/xxfb/jdxwnew2/201704/t20170404_821344.shtml. |
[4] | China Tourism Academy (2016) China's Tourism performance: Review & Forecast (2015-2016), Beijing: China Travel & Tourism Press. |
[5] | China's Sports Tourism Research Center (2016) Sports Tourism is a New Fashion. Available from: http://sports.sohu.com/20161008/n469749706.shtml. |
[6] | Chinese Commerce Network (2016) In the First Half of 2016 Online Travel Market Analysis Report. Available from: http://www.askci.com/news/hlw/20160801/14095348917.shtml. |
[7] | Huang ZQ (2013) A Study on Chang Ning's Tourism Market Positioning and Marketing Strategies. University of South China. |
[8] | Liang XC, Lian YJ (2015) The Realization Path of the Integration of Cultural Tourism Industry. Available from: http://www.toptour.cn/tab1648/info200473.htm. |
[9] | Mafengwo Travel Network, China Tourism Academy (2017) Global Independent Travel Report 2016. Beijing: China Travel & Tourism Press. |
[10] | Ministry of Culture and Tourism of the PRC (2019) Increase in tourist numbers and income during the 2019 Spring Festival holiday. Available from: https://www.mct.gov.cn/whzx/whyw/201902/t20190212_837269.htm. |
[11] | Ministry of Culture and Tourism of the PRC (2019) The basic situation of the tourism market in 2019. Available from: https://www.mct.gov.cn/whzx/whyw/202003/t20200310_851786.htm. |
[12] | Ministry of Culture and Tourism of the PRC (2018) Annual inventory of Hainan tourism in 2018. Available from: https://www.mct.gov.cn/whzx/qgwhxxlb/hn_7734/201901/t20190117_836971.htm. |
[13] | National Bureau of Statistics (2019) A series of reports on the economic and social development achievements of the 70th anniversary of the founding of New China. Available from: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201908/t20190829_1694202.html. |
[14] | National Bureau of Statistics (2020) National data. Available from: https://data.stats.gov.cn/index.htm. |
[15] | National Bureau of Statistics (2020) Statistical Communiqué of the People's Republic of China on the 2019 National Economic and Social Development. Available from: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/202002/t20200228_1728913.html. |
[16] | National Bureau of Statistics (2020) National Data Center. Available from: https://data.stats.gov.cn/search.htm. |
[17] | OECD (2020) Conversion rate of PPP. Available from: https://data.oecd.org/conversion/purchasing-power-parities-ppp.htm. |
[18] | Planning and Statistics Department of National Tourism Administration (1991) Statistical Bulletin of China's Tourism Industry During the Seventh Five-Year Plan. Available from: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFD9093&filename=LYXK199104006&v=Cb929UAhjiZA76uhaGu81bo9ubif4r6AFDBrQzLtyRpo2LpzZ8eSxw2YIncB%25mmd2FaVj. |
[19] | Sichuan China Travel Service (2019) Relaxation to China's Visa Policy in Many Countries. Available from: http://www.scstour.com/articlexq/1114.html. |
[20] | The central People's government of the PRC (2019) Statistical Report on China's Internet Development. Available from: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-08/31/content_5426016.htm. |
[21] | UNWTO (2020) Tourism Statistics. Available from: https://www.e-unwto.org/toc/unwtotfb/current. |
[22] | Wang F, Wen HB (2012) Impact Analysis and the Countermeasures of the Construction of Nan-Guang High-speed Railway to the Development of Tourism in Guangxi. Orient Enterpr Culture, 222-223. |
[23] | Wang Y (2016) Tourist Destination Official Website's Influences on Tourism Decision-making. Capital University of Economics and Business. |
[24] | Xia XY (2015) The Influence Factors of Rural Residents' Tourism Consumption Will-Take the Anhui Province for Example. Anhui University of Finance and Economics. |
[25] | Zhang F (2016) Outbound Tourism Market Presents New Characteristics in 2016. Available from: http://tour.dzwww.com/shandong/mxly/201703/t20170303_15621925.htm. |
[26] | Zhen AL (2012) The Influence Factors of Our Country Rural Per Capita Tourism Consumption. J Nanyang Normal Univ 3: 73-78. |
1. | Andrea Aglić Aljinović, Lana Horvat Dmitrović , Ana Žgaljić Keko , Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for shifted quantum integral operator, 2024, 51, 12236934, 106, 10.52846/ami.v51i1.1749 |