
This study examined how the focus of environmental and sustainability bonds (ESBs) influences investor preferences, particularly in relation to return rates and risk perceptions. A labeled discrete choice experiment was conducted on Japanese retail investors to examine their preference among the ESBs: green, sustainability, and blue bonds. The present study found that with low return rates, investors were indifferent among the three ESBs. However, higher return rates led investors to favor sustainability bonds. Furthermore, ESBs were less preferable to government bonds when the benchmark return rate was high, underscoring the need to set a relatively low benchmark return rate to attract investors to ESBs. Risk-averse investors were hesitant to choose ESBs when the return rates were low, emphasizing the importance of accurate risk information. The study highlighted the critical role of credit ratings, third-party certification, and transparent reporting for ESBs, suggesting that providing clear risk information is vital for expanding the ESB market.
Citation: Kentaka Aruga, Md. Monirul Islam. Assessing investor preferences for environmental and sustainability bonds in Japan: A discrete choice experiment approach[J]. Green Finance, 2025, 7(2): 200-222. doi: 10.3934/GF.2025008
[1] | Dong-feng Li, Aisikeer Tulahong, Md. Nazim Uddin, Huan Zhao, Hua Zhang . Meta-analysis identifying epithelial-derived transcriptomes predicts poor clinical outcome and immune infiltrations in ovarian cancer. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(5): 6527-6551. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021324 |
[2] | Huiqing Wang, Xiao Han, Jianxue Ren, Hao Cheng, Haolin Li, Ying Li, Xue Li . A prognostic prediction model for ovarian cancer using a cross-modal view correlation discovery network. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(1): 736-764. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024031 |
[3] | Ziyu Wu, Sugui Wang, Qiang Li, Qingsong Zhao, Mingming Shao . Identification of 10 differently expressed lncRNAs as prognostic biomarkers for prostate adenocarcinoma. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(3): 2037-2047. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020108 |
[4] | Hao Zhu, Nan Wang, Jonathan Z. Sun, Ras B. Pandey, Zheng Wang . Inferring the three-dimensional structures of the X-chromosome during X-inactivation. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(6): 7384-7404. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019369 |
[5] | Yong Ding, Jian-Hong Liu . The signature lncRNAs associated with the lung adenocarcinoma patients prognosis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(2): 1593-1603. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020083 |
[6] | Li Peng, Yujie Yang, Cheng Yang, Zejun Li, Ngai Cheong . HRGCNLDA: Forecasting of lncRNA-disease association based on hierarchical refinement graph convolutional neural network. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(4): 4814-4834. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024212 |
[7] | Yun-xiang Li, Shi-ming Wang, Chen-quan Li . Four-lncRNA immune prognostic signature for triple-negative breast cancer. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(4): 3939-3956. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021197 |
[8] | Hao Shen, Xiao-Dong Weng, Du Yang, Lei Wang, Xiu-Heng Liu . Long noncoding RNA MIR22HG is down-regulated in prostate cancer. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(2): 1776-1786. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020093 |
[9] | Xu Guo, Yuanming Jing, Haizhou Lou, Qiaonv Lou . Effect and mechanism of long non-coding RNA ZEB2-AS1 in the occurrence and development of colon cancer. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(6): 8109-8120. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019408 |
[10] | Jie Wang, Md. Nazim Uddin, Rehana Akter, Yun Wu . Contribution of endothelial cell-derived transcriptomes to the colon cancer based on bioinformatics analysis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 7280-7300. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021360 |
This study examined how the focus of environmental and sustainability bonds (ESBs) influences investor preferences, particularly in relation to return rates and risk perceptions. A labeled discrete choice experiment was conducted on Japanese retail investors to examine their preference among the ESBs: green, sustainability, and blue bonds. The present study found that with low return rates, investors were indifferent among the three ESBs. However, higher return rates led investors to favor sustainability bonds. Furthermore, ESBs were less preferable to government bonds when the benchmark return rate was high, underscoring the need to set a relatively low benchmark return rate to attract investors to ESBs. Risk-averse investors were hesitant to choose ESBs when the return rates were low, emphasizing the importance of accurate risk information. The study highlighted the critical role of credit ratings, third-party certification, and transparent reporting for ESBs, suggesting that providing clear risk information is vital for expanding the ESB market.
Abbreviations: OC: Ovarian cancer; ncRNA: Non-coding RNA; lncRNAs: Long non-coding RNAs; GC: Gastric cancer; GO: Gene ontology; KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the most common gynecological malignant tumors and has been one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in western countries [1,2,3,4,5]. Of note, the incidence of OC is also increasing in China. Despite surgery and chemotherapy have been widely used in the treatment of OC, the prognosis of OC remained to be unsatisfied. Therefore, further understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the development of OC is still an urgent need for the diagnosis and treatment of this disease.
Non-coding RNA (ncRNA) is a class of RNA modules which have no protein-coding function. Recently, ncRNAs had been revealed to play a crucial role in human diseases. Emerging evidence has shown that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) played important roles in both physiological and pathological processes of cancers [6,7,8]. LncRNA could affect a variety of biological processes, such as autophagy, proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, and cell cycle, in cells. For example, lncRNA Fendrr played an important role in the development of heart and body wall in the mouse, and the lack of Fendrr lead to abnormal mouse embryonic development [9]. Thomas et al. found hundreds of TNFα-induced inflammation-related lncRNAs in mice, in which Lethe was involved in the negative feedback of inflammatory signals [10]. H19 is overexpressed in gastric cancer (GC) tissues and promotes GC proliferation, migration, invasion, and metastasis [11]. Recent studies also demonstrated that lncRNA HOST2 [12], LSINCT5 [13], HOTAIR [14], NEAT1 [15] were dysregulated in OC and associated with the occurrence and progression of OC.
LncRNA XIST is the first lncRNA reported to be involved in the regulation of X chromosome inactivation. Recent studies have shown that XIST is dysregulated in multiple cancer types, including gastric, liver, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, cervical, non-small cell lung, glioma, pancreatic, osteosarcoma, colorectal, and breast cancer. In cervical cancer, XIST competitively binds to miR-200a to promote tumor progression [16]. In non-small cell lung cancer, XIST inhibits tumor cell proliferation and EMT progression by modulating miR-137 to regulateNotch-1 signaling pathway [17]. However, the functional roles and expression pattern of XIST in OC remain unclear. The present study aimed to explore whether XIST could serve as a new diagnostic target in OC.
The present study used TCGA (The cancer genome atlas) to analysis the XIST expression levels. The TCGA database, including a total of 305 OC samples (23 Stage Ⅱ OC samples, 244 Stage Ⅲ OC samples, and 38 Stage Ⅳ OC samples). The Kaplan-Meier plotter database was used to analyze the correlation between XIST and survival time in patients.
The TCGA database was used to analyze XIST co-expressed genes. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Pathway analysis were performed on the top 1000 co-expressed genes by using the DAVID database [18,19] (https://David.ncifcrf.gov/). The interaction network between proteins was performed using the STRING (https://string-db.org/) database. The Starbase database was used to predict the regulatory cascade of XIST-miRNAs. Pearson’s correlation coefficient ≥ 0.4 is selected as a candidate, and the network was presented by Cytoscape.
The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 17.0 software. T-test and Mann-Whitney U-test statistics were used to perform the statistical significance of differences between two groups; One-way ANOVA was used to perform the statistical significance of differences between multiple groups. The survival curve was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method. P < 0.05 was selected as significant.
To explore the expression levels of XIST in OC, we first used the GTEx database to determine the expression of XIST in multiple human tissues, including ovary, cervix, uterus, testes, brains, and kidney. The results showed that the expression level of XIST in the human ovary, cervix, uterus was significantly higher than that in other tissues (Figure 1A).
Next, we analyzed the expression of XIST in OC tissues and normal ovarian tissues by using the GEPIA database, which contained RNA sequencing data of 88 normal ovarian tissues and 426 OC samples by integrating TCGA and GTEx databases. As shown in Figure 1B, our results showed that the XIST was significantly downregulated in OC compared to normal tissues (Figure 1B, p < 0.05).
Furthermore, we analyze the correlation between its expression and stage. Totally, there are 305 OC samples that were with well-defined pathological stages in the TCGA dataset was used to conduct the analysis. The results showed that XIST was significantly downregulated in Stage Ⅲ OC compared that in Stage Ⅱ OC (Figure 1C, p < 0.05) and significantly downregulated in Stage Ⅳ OC compared that in Stage Ⅱ OC (Figure 1C, p < 0.05). However, no significant difference of XIST levels was observed between Stage Ⅲ OC and Stage Ⅳ OC samples.
To further explore the role of XIST in OC, the present study first analyzed the relationship between XIST and survival time in OC by using the TCGA database. The results showed that higher XIST expression levels were associated with longer overall survival time (Figure 1D, p < 0.05).
The present study also used the Kaplan-Meier plotter datasets to further explore the relationship between XIST and survival time in different types of OC. The present study found that upregulated XIST was positively correlated with longer survival time in OC (Figure 2A, p < 0.001), Serous OC (Figure 2C, p < 0.001), Grade 1 + 2 OC (Figure 2D, p < 0.01), Grade 3 OC (Figure 2E, p < 0.001), Stage Ⅲ + Ⅳ OC (Figure 2G, p < 0.001). However, the present study did not find the correlation between XIST and survival time in endometrial OC (Figure 2B) and Stage Ⅰ + Ⅱ OC (Figure 2F).
The present study first analyzed the co-expressed gene of XIST by using TCGA database, and the most significant 1000 co-expressed genes were selected. Gene Ontology analysis (GO analysis) was further used to predict the potential roles of XIST in OC. The results revealed that XIST is involved in a series of biological processes including transcription, protein phosphorylation, transport, protein ubiquitination, DNA repair, ciliary morphogenesis, RNA splicing, cilia assembly, mRNA processing, and cell cycle regulation (Figure 3A). Molecular Function analysis showed that XIST could participate in many functions, including DNA binding, ATP binding, nucleic acid binding, poly (A) RNA binding, transcription factor activity, RNA binding, protein serine/threonine kinase activity, nucleoside Acid binding, protein kinase activity (Figure 3B). KEGG analysis showed that XIST affected many signaling pathways, including taste, mRNA monitoring, Fanconi anemia, small cell lung cancer, ECM-receptor interaction, NF-κB, protein digestion and absorption, transcriptional dysregulation in cancer, lysine degradation, amebic disease (Figure 3C).
The present study constructed XIST‑mediated PPI networks by using the top 1000 co-expressing genes of XIST via the STRING database. The results identified three core networks. Among them, Module 1 included 12 core proteins (P2RY4, DRD2, TAS2R4, TAS2R5, TAS2R10, AS2R3, NPBWR2, GRM6, TAS2R39, OXER1, GABBR1, TAS2R50, Figure 4A), Module 2 included 11 core proteins (KBTBD10, KLHL3, HERC2, WSB1, ASB14, FBXL8, ANAPC4, ASB16, RLIM, ASB6, HERC1, Figure 4B) and Module 3 included 9 core proteins (CCDC41, CEP152, CEP164, FBF1, OFD1, CEP290, AHI1) TTBK2, AKAP9, Figure 4C).
Recent studies have found that XIST could participate in the regulation of tumor progression as a natural miRNA sponge. However, the mechanisms of XIST in OC remained unclear. Therefore, the present study systematically and comprehensively constructed an XIST-mediated endogenous competitive RNA interaction network. This study predicted the XIST-miRNAs regulatory cascade by using the Starbase database and then used the same method to predict the XIST-miRNAs-mRNAs regulatory cascade. Only XIST-mRNAs with positive correlation expression were selected for the construction of ceRNAs networks based on co-expression analysis results.
The network included 202 miRNAs and 462 mRNAs as shown in Figure 5. Ten of these miRNAs were identified as the core regulator of the network, including hsa-miR-590-3p, hsa-miR-340-5p, hsa-miR-181b-5p, hsa-miR-424-5p, hsa-miR-15b-5p, hsa-miR-495-3p, hsa-miR-15a-5p, hsa-miR-181a-5p, hsa-miR-181d-5p, hsa-miR-30c-5p, hsa-miR-497-5p, hsa-miR-16- 5p, hsa-miR-30e-5p, hsa-miR-181c-5p, involved in the regulation of up to 100 different mRNAs. The present study also found that DDX3X, CHD9, POU2F1, YOD1, MAT2A, BRWD1, INO80D, GPCPD1, and MDM4 were regulated by more than 100 different miRNAs, suggesting that they acted as key XIST regulatory genes.
Emerging studies demonstrated lncRNAs play important roles in regulating cell proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation. For example, lncRNA loc285194 played as a tumor suppressor function by competitively binding to miR-211 in colorectal cancer [20]. UCA1 is overexpressed in liver cancer and sponged miR-216b to inhibit tumor growth [21]. MALAT1 could cause microvascular dysfunction in diabetic patients [22]. Exploring the roles of lncRNAs in human diseases could provide novel biomarkers for prognosis and treatment.
OC is one of the most common gynecological malignant tumors. Previous studies had reported that lncRNA played an important role in the development and progression of OC. A series of lncRNAs are abnormally expressed in OC, such as GAS5 [23], TP73-AS1 [24], CCAT1, and MALAT1 [25]. LncRNA could regulate a series of OC related biological processes such as proliferation, cycle, and apoptosis. For instance, Lnc-OC1 promotes proliferation and migration of OC cells by competitively binding to miR-34a and miR-34c [26]. LncRNA CTD-2020K17.1 has been reported as an oncogene to promote OC metastasis, invasion, and proliferation [27]. However, it should be noted that the functions of most lncRNAs in OC are still unclear. Several previous studies indicated XIST might be associated with the development of OC. However, there is still a lack of systematic analysis to support XIST as a target for clinical diagnosis in OC. Then in the silico analysis based on multiple platforms in this study showed that the expression level of XIST was significantly increased in normal ovary, uterus, and cervix tissues, while the expression level was significantly decreased in OC tissues.
Further analysis showed that XIST expression levels in advanced-grade OC were significantly lower than in low-grade OC. Moreover, the overexpression of XIST was positively correlated with the longer survival time of patients with OC, Serous OC, Grade 1 + 2 OC, Grade 3 OC, and Stage Ⅲ + Ⅳ OC. These analyses showed that XIST could serve as a potential diagnostic marker for OC.
Emerging studies have shown that in addition to routine functional assays in vitro and in vivo, the widespread use of bioinformatics tools such as protein-protein interaction networks and endogenous competitive RNA networks plays an important role in uncovering the underlying pathogenesis of the human disease. To explore the potential functions and mechanisms of XIST in OC, the present study first performed co-expression analysis and bioinformatic analysis and identified three core interaction networks included 12 core proteins, 11 core proteins, and 9 core proteins respectively. The results revealed that XIST was involved in the biological processes of transcription, protein phosphorylation, transport, protein ubiquitination, DNA repair, ciliary morphogenesis, RNA splicing, DNA binding, ATP binding. KEGG signaling pathway analysis showed that XIST affected many signaling pathways, including taste, mRNA monitoring, Fanconi anemia, small cell lung cancer, ECM-receptor interaction, NF-κB, protein digestion and absorption, transcriptional dysregulation in cancer, lysine degradation, and amebic disease.
Previous studies show XIST plays an important regulatory role in the development of multiple tumors, including gastric cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and breast cancer. XIST, as one of the longest lncRNAs in mammals, previous reports have shown that XIST plays a wide range of endogenous competitive RNA in cells, affecting multiple miRNA activity included miR-137, miR-200c, miR-155, miR-320 and miR-34a [28,29,30]. For example, XIST can inhibit the proliferation and metastasis of breast cancer cells by affecting the miR-155/CDX1 cascade control axis. The present study first systematically constructed OC-specific XIST-mediated endogenous competitive RNA network. Several studies in OC also demonstrated that XIST had a regulatory role in cancer progression. However, these reports are often contradictory. For example, Zuo et al. found XIST promoted malignant behavior of epithelial OC, while Wang et al. demonstrated that XIST has anticancer effects on epithelial OC cells through inverse downregulation of hsa-miR-214-3p. Of note, with the development of bioinformatics analysis, emerging studies revealed that bioinformatics analysis could provide more clues to understand the potential roles of genes in human diseases. The network included 202 miRNAs and 462 mRNAs, of which 10 miRNAs were identified as the core regulatory factors of this network, including hsa-miR-590-3p, hsa-miR-340-5p, hsa-miR-181b-5p, which regulated more than 100 different mRNAs in the network. These miRNAs played an important regulatory role in OC. For example, miR-590-3p could promote the proliferation and metastasis of OC by regulating FOXA2. miR-424 could inhibit the metastasis, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of OC.
In this study, there also exist some limitations. Firstly, the expression levels of XIST in OC and normal tissues should be detected to validate the bioinformatics analysis in future study. Secondly, the specific functions of XIST had not been further excavated in this study. Further experimental validation would be required for future verification.
In summary, the present study showed lncRNA XIST was significantly down-regulated in OC and was associated with the development of OC. Overexpression of XIST was significantly associated with longer survival time in patients with OC. Also, our analysis also showed that lncRNA XIST was closely related to biological processes such as transcription, protein phosphorylation, transport, protein ubiquitination, and DNA repair, which provided a theoretical basis for the diagnosis and treatment of OC.
All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper
[1] |
Ahmad H, Yaqub M, Lee SH (2023) Environmental-, social-, and governance-related factors for business investment and sustainability: a scientometric review of global trends. Environ Dev Sustain 26: 2965–2987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02921-x doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-02921-x
![]() |
[2] |
Agliardi E, Agliardi R (2021) Corporate green bonds: Understanding the greenium in a two-factor structural model. Environ Resour Econ 80: 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-021-00585-7 doi: 10.1007/s10640-021-00585-7
![]() |
[3] |
Akomea-Frimpong I, Adeabah D, Ofosu D, et al. (2022) A review of studies on green finance of banks, research gaps and future directions. J Sustain Finance Invest 12: 1241–1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1870202 doi: 10.1080/20430795.2020.1870202
![]() |
[4] |
Apergis N, Poufinas T, Antonopoulos A (2022) ESG scores and cost of debt. Energy Econ 112: 106186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106186 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106186
![]() |
[5] |
Arat E, Hachenberg B, Kiesel F, et al. (2023) Greenium, credit rating, and the COVID-19 pandemic. J Asset Manag 24: 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-023-00320-5 doi: 10.1057/s41260-023-00320-5
![]() |
[6] |
Aruga K, Bolt T (2023) Identifying factors affecting the preference for green bonds: A Japanese case study. J Clim Financ 5: 100021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclimf.2023.100021 doi: 10.1016/j.jclimf.2023.100021
![]() |
[7] |
Aruga K (2020) Is environmental awareness a good predictor of an individual's altruism level? Sustainability 12: 7929. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197929 doi: 10.3390/su12197929
![]() |
[8] |
Aruga K (2024a) Comparing the willingness to invest returns among green, sustainability, and blue bonds. J Environ Manag 364: 121458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121458 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121458
![]() |
[9] |
Aruga K (2024b) Are retail investors willing to buy green bonds? A case for Japan. J Sustain Financ Invest (Forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2024.2349723 doi: 10.1080/20430795.2024.2349723
![]() |
[10] |
Baldi F, Pandimiglio A (2022) The role of ESG scoring and greenwashing risk in explaining the yields of green bonds: A conceptual framework and an econometric analysis. Glob Financ J 52: 100711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2022.100711 doi: 10.1016/j.gfj.2022.100711
![]() |
[11] |
Brach S, Walsh G, Shaw D (2018) Sustainable consumption and third-party certification labels: Consumers' perceptions and reactions. Eur Manag J 36: 254–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.03.005 doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2017.03.005
![]() |
[12] | Climate Bonds Initiative (CBI) (2019) Climate bonds standard version 3.0. Accessed on: 13 July 2024. Available from: https://www.climatebonds.net/files/files/climate-bonds-standard-v3-20191210.pdf. |
[13] |
Contini C, Boncinelli F, Romano C, et al. (2019) Discrete choice experiments with multiple price vectors for products sold in a wide price range. Methods X 6: 1774–1778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.07.026 doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.07.026
![]() |
[14] |
Cortellini G, Panetta IC (2021) Green bond: a systematic literature review for future research agendas. J Risk Financ Manag 14: 589. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14120589 doi: 10.3390/jrfm14120589
![]() |
[15] | Development Bank of Japan. (n.d.) Sustainability bonds. Accessed on: 2 November 2024. Available from: https://www.dbj.jp/en/ir/credit/sri/#:~:text=Sustainability%20bonds%20are%20bonds%20where,Bonds%20each%20year%20since%202015. |
[16] | Environmental Finance (2024) Japan leads the way as investors turn their sights to transition impact. Accessed on: 2 November 2024. Available from: https://www.environmental-finance.com/content/the-green-bond-hub/japan-leads-the-way-as-investors-turn-their-sights-to-transition impact.html. |
[17] |
Esther HL, Donkers B, Leonie D, et al. (2010) Labeled versus unlabeled discrete choice experiments in health economics: an application to colorectal cancer screening. Value Health 13: 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00670.x doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00670.x
![]() |
[18] | European Investment Bank (2021) Evaluation of the EIB's climate awareness bonds. Accessed on: 2 November 2024. Available from: https://www.eib.org/attachments/ev/ev_report_evaluation_eib_climate_awareness_bonds_en.pdf. |
[19] |
Fatica S, Panzica R (2021) Green bonds as a tool against climate change? Bus Strategy Environ 30: 2688–2701. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2771 doi: 10.1002/bse.2771
![]() |
[20] |
Fiebig DG, Keane MP, Louviere J, et al. (2009) The generalized multinomial logit model: accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. Mark Sci 29: 393–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1090.0508 doi: 10.1287/mksc.1090.0508
![]() |
[21] |
Flammer C (2021) Corporate green bonds. J Financ Econ 142: 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010
![]() |
[22] |
Gebhardt M, Thun TW, Seefloth M, et al. (2023) Managing sustainability—Does the integration of environmental, social and governance key performance indicators in the internal management systems contribute to companies' environmental, social and governance performance? Bus Strategy Environ 32: 2175–2192. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3242 doi: 10.1002/bse.3242
![]() |
[23] |
Glenk K, Meyerhoff J, Akaichi F, et al. (2019) Revisiting cost vector effects in discrete choice experiments. Resour Energy Econ 57: 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2019.05.001 doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2019.05.001
![]() |
[24] | Hussain F, Dill H (2022) Sovereign green, social and sustainability bonds: Unlocking the potential for emerging markets and developing economies. Available from: https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/4de3839b85c57eb958dd207fad132f8e-0340012022/original/WB-GSS-Bonds-Survey-Report.pdf. |
[25] |
Khaled R, Ali H, Mohamed EKA (2021) The sustainable development goals and corporate sustainability performance: Mapping, extent and determinants. J Clean Prod 311: 127599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127599 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127599
![]() |
[26] | Kumar S (2022) A quest for sustainium (sustainability premium): review of sustainable bonds. Acad Account Financ Stud J 26: 1–18. |
[27] |
Larcker DF, Watts EM (2020) Where's the greenium? J Account Econ 69: 101312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101312 doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101312
![]() |
[28] |
Lee M, Singh J (2020) How to overcome 'warm glow' and other barriers to effective impact investment decisions. Stanf Soc Innov Rev. https://doi.org/10.48558/TNQ1-9M32 doi: 10.48558/TNQ1-9M32
![]() |
[29] |
Lemos S, Halstead JM, Huang JC (2022) The effects of information about price anchoring: Evidence from a choice experiment. Agric Resour Econ Rev 51: 240–265. https://doi.org/10.1017/age.2022.10 doi: 10.1017/age.2022.10
![]() |
[30] |
Li Z, Tang Y, Wu J, et al. (2020) The interest costs of green bonds: credit ratings, corporate social responsibility, and certification. Emerging Mark Financ Trade 56: 2679–2692. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496x.2018.1548350 doi: 10.1080/1540496x.2018.1548350
![]() |
[31] |
Löffler KU, Petreski A, Stephan A (2021) Drivers of green bond issuance and new evidence on the "greenium". Eurasian Eco Rev 11: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-020-00165-y doi: 10.1007/s40822-020-00165-y
![]() |
[32] |
MacAskill S, Roca E, Liu B, et al. (2021) Is there a green premium in the Green Bond market? Systematic literature review revealing premium determinants. J Clean Prod 280: 124491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124491 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124491
![]() |
[33] |
March A, Evans T, Laing S, et al. (2024) Evaluating the world's first sovereign blue bond: lessons for operationalising blue finance. Commodities 3: 151–167. https://doi.org/10.3390/commodities3020010 doi: 10.3390/commodities3020010
![]() |
[34] |
March A, Failler P, Bennett M (2023) Challenges when designing blue bond financing for Small Island Developing States. ICES J Mari Sci 80: 2244–2251. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsac238 doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsac238
![]() |
[35] |
Maltais A, Nykvist B (2021) Understanding the role of green bonds in advancing sustainability. J Sustain Financ Invest 11:233–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1724864 doi: 10.1080/20430795.2020.1724864
![]() |
[36] | McFadden D (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior P Zarembka (Eds.), Frontiers in econometrics, 105–142. New York: Academic Press. |
[37] | Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan (MOE) (2021) Green bond ni kansuru kankyoushyo no torikumi ni tuite (Initiatives taken by the MOE on green bond) (in Japanese). Available from: https://www.fsa.go.jp/singi/social_bond/siryou/20210310/03.pdf. |
[38] |
Nanayakkara M, Colombage S (2019) Do investors in green bond market pay a premium? Global evidence. Appl Econ 51: 4425–4437. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1591611 doi: 10.1080/00036846.2019.1591611
![]() |
[39] | Offshore Energy (2023) MOL to issue world's first blue bonds in shipping. Accessed on: 2 November 2024. Available from: https://www.offshore-energy.biz/mol-to-issue-worlds-first-blue-bonds-in-shipping. |
[40] |
Raharjanti NW, Wiguna T, Purwadianto A, et al. (2022) Translation, validity and reliability of decision style scale in forensic psychiatric setting in Indonesia. Heliyon 8: e09810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09810 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09810
![]() |
[41] |
Rajesh R (2020) Exploring the sustainability performances of firms using environmental, social, and governance scores. J Clean Prod 247: 119600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119600 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119600
![]() |
[42] |
Rushton JP, Chrisjohn RD, Fekken GC (1981) The altruistic personality and the self-report altruism scale. Pers Individ Differ 2: 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(81)90084-2 doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(81)90084-2
![]() |
[43] |
Sangiorgi I, Schopohl L (2021) Why do institutional investors buy green bonds: Evidence from a survey of European asset managers. Int Rev Financ Anal 75: 101738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101738 doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101738
![]() |
[44] |
Schumacher K, Chenet H, Volz U (2020) Sustainable finance in Japan. J Sustain Financ Invest 10: 213–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1735219 doi: 10.1080/20430795.2020.1735219
![]() |
[45] |
Thompson BS (2022) Blue bonds for marine conservation and a sustainable ocean economy: Status, trends, and insights from green bonds. Mar Policy 144: 105219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105219 doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105219
![]() |
[46] |
Tolliver C, Fujii H, Keeley AR, et al. (2021) Green innovation and finance in Asia. Asian Econ Policy Rev 16: 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12320 doi: 10.1111/aepr.12320
![]() |
[47] | Train K, Weeks M (2005) Discrete Choice Models in Preference Space and Willingness-to-Pay Space. In: Scarpa R, Alberini A. (Eds.), Applications of simulation methods in environmental and resource economics. The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources, 6. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3684-1_1 |
[48] |
Zerbib OD (2019) The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds. J Bank Financ 98: 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.10.012 doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.10.012
![]() |
[49] |
Zhao Z, Gong Y, Li Y, et al. (2021) Gender-related beliefs, norms, and the link with green consumption. Fron Psychol 12: 710239. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.710239 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.710239
![]() |
[50] |
Zhu Q, Zhao XF, Wu M (2024) Third-party certification: how to effectively prevent greenwash in green bond market? –analysis based on signalling game. Environ Dev Sustain 26: 16173–16199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03292-z doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-03292-z
![]() |
[51] |
Zirek D, Unsal O (2023) Green bonds: Do investors benefit from third-party certification? Glob Fin J 58: 100872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2023.100872 doi: 10.1016/j.gfj.2023.100872
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1. | Ting Guo, Donglan Yuan, Wei Zhang, Dandan Zhu, Aifang Xiao, Guangyao Mao, Wenjuan Jiang, Mei Lin, Jun Wang, Upregulation of long noncoding RNA XIST has anticancer effects on ovarian cancer through sponging miR-106a, 2021, 34, 1749-0774, 579, 10.1007/s13577-020-00469-w | |
2. | Huiying Xu, Lingyan Wang, Xiuli Jiang, Silencing of lncRNA DLEU1 inhibits tumorigenesis of ovarian cancer via regulating miR-429/TFAP2A axis, 2021, 476, 0300-8177, 1051, 10.1007/s11010-020-03971-9 | |
3. | Tao Cai, Yan He, Binyu Peng, IncRNA XIST Stimulates Papillary Thyroid Cancer Development through the miR-330-3p/PDE5A Axis , 2023, 33, 1045-4403, 13, 10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.2022043844 | |
4. | Jianjian Li, Zhe Ming, Liuyi Yang, Tingxuan Wang, Gaowen Liu, Qing Ma, Long noncoding RNA XIST: Mechanisms for X chromosome inactivation, roles in sex-biased diseases, and therapeutic opportunities, 2022, 9, 23523042, 1478, 10.1016/j.gendis.2022.04.007 | |
5. | Alexey V. Zamaraev, Pavel I. Volik, Gennady T. Sukhikh, Gelina S. Kopeina, Boris Zhivotovsky, Long non-coding RNAs: A view to kill ovarian cancer, 2021, 1876, 0304419X, 188584, 10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188584 | |
6. | Maja Sabol, Jean Calleja-Agius, Riccardo Di Fiore, Sherif Suleiman, Sureyya Ozcan, Mark P. Ward, Petar Ozretić, (In)Distinctive Role of Long Non-Coding RNAs in Common and Rare Ovarian Cancers, 2021, 13, 2072-6694, 5040, 10.3390/cancers13205040 | |
7. | Razieh Mohammad Jafari, Ali Tahan, Mohammad Amin Askari, Hasti Roshandel, Seyed Mohammad Ali Gharizadeh, Maryam Farzaneh, The Role of LncRNA XIST in Gynecologic Cancers, 2023, 19, 15733947, 172, 10.2174/1573394719666230102124549 | |
8. | Inês Soares Marques, Valéria Tavares, Joana Savva-Bordalo, Mariana Rei, Joana Liz-Pimenta, Inês Guerra de Melo, Joana Assis, Deolinda Pereira, Rui Medeiros, Long Non-Coding RNAs: Bridging Cancer-Associated Thrombosis and Clinical Outcome of Ovarian Cancer Patients, 2023, 25, 1422-0067, 140, 10.3390/ijms25010140 | |
9. | Nazia Afroze, Madhumitha K. Sundaram, Shafiul Haque, Arif Hussain, Long non-coding RNA involved in the carcinogenesis of human female cancer - a comprehensive review, 2025, 16, 2730-6011, 10.1007/s12672-025-01848-1 |