Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

On the Defence: UK cultural narratives of mistrust between energy users and providers

Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7XA, UK

Special Issues: Cultural Narratives in Health

In general, households rely on energy providers to supply essential energy services such as gas and electricity. It seems reasonable to assume that it is mutually beneficial to have a customer and supplier relationship invested in trust. Key findings from the qualitative evaluation findings of a UK Comic Relief-funded energy services and managing money better programme, suggest that the programme’s effectiveness was strongly affected by negative narratives about energy suppliers. Such narratives, rooted in feelings of being labelled a ‘cheat’ or incapable of sorting their own affairs on one side and views of energy providers being exploitative and profit-hungry on the other, engendered a common, oppositional ‘united against them’ culture, built on reciprocal mistrust and disrespect. This analysis is not unique to our research, as nationally, at least and within the last decade, there has been a decline in public trust of energy providers, with a suggestion that profit has come before people. The 3-year evaluation carried out by Northumbria University, UK with the research led by a North East England registered credit union and social landlord, assessed the quality of life impacts of a face-to-face energy advice service. Expert Energy Advisors offered free home visits and gave people aged 50 and over the tools to reduce and manage energy usage, question energy companies about tariff terms and conditions and ensure maximum take up of benefit entitlements. Whilst findings point to positive health and social benefits, including reducing high anxiety about unmanageable bills, being able to question and challenge energy providers ‘high’ bills and tariffs and passing on such skills to others, there remained a ‘taken-for-granted’ mistrust of energy providers. We argue that for public good to come from public health research, we need to understand and appropriately address the roots of such cultural narratives.
  Article Metrics

Keywords energy services; older people; cultural narratives

Citation: Cathy Bailey, Philip Hodgson. On the Defence: UK cultural narratives of mistrust between energy users and providers. AIMS Public Health , 2018, 5(1): 31-48. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2018.1.31


  • 1. Hinyard LJ, Kreuter MW (2007) Using Narrative Communication as a Tool for Health Behavior Change: A Conceptual, Theoretical, and Empirical Overview. Health Educ Behav 34: 777.    
  • 2. Bruner JS (1985) Narrative and Paradigmatic Models of Thought. In Eisner (ed.), Learning and Teaching the Ways of Knowing, NSSE, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
  • 3. Campbell D (2011) Anthropology's Contribution to Public Health Policy Development. Mcgill J Med 13: 76.
  • 4. Jones MD, McBeth MK (2010) A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong? Policy Stud J 38: 329–353.    
  • 5. Davidson B (2016) Narrative Change and the Open Society Health Program. Available from: https://onthinktanks.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/20160711_Narrative-change-paper-1.pdf.
  • 6. Haidt J (2012) The Righteous Mind. Pantheon, New York.
  • 7. Kahneman D (2011) Thinking Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • 8. Fisher WR (1984) Narration and a human communication paradigm: the case of public moral argument. Commun Monogr 51: 1–22.    
  • 9. Polletta F (2006) It Was Like A Fever: Storytelling in Protest and Politics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • 10. Hargreaves T (2005) Practice-ing Behaviour Change: applying social practice theory to pro-environmental change. J Consum Cult 11: 79–99.
  • 11. Airhihenbuwa CO, Webster JD (2004) Culture and African Context of HIV/AIDS prevention, Care and Support. SAHARA J 1: 4–13.    
  • 12. Lepselter S (2011) The Disorder of Things: Hoarding Narratives in Popular Media. Anthropol Q 84: 919–947.    
  • 13. Ernst, Young (2013) In Utilities we Trust: How can energy providers win back the trust of their customers?
  • 14. Public Opinion (2014) Trust in energy companies has fallen to near-rock bottom. Why? Carbon Brief Ltd. Available from: https://www.carbonbrief.org/trust-in-energy-companies-has-fallen-to-near-rock-bottom-why.
  • 15. Ingrams S (2017) Best and worst energy companies. Which? Available from: https://www.which.co.uk/reviews/energy-companies/article/best-and-worst-energy-companies.
  • 16. Layburn-Langton L (2016) Community and Local Energy Challenges and Opportunities. Institute for Public Policy Research.
  • 17. Edelman Trust Barometer (2014) Trust in Energy. Edelman. Available from: https://www.edelman.com/insights/intellectual-property/2014-edelman-trust-barometer/trust-in-business/trust-energy/.
  • 18. Baron S (2015) Best energy suppliers 2015. Which? Customer service satisfaction survey 2015. Available from: https://www.which.co.uk/news/2015/01/best-energy-suppliers-2015-revealed-391795.
  • 19. Public Health England (2014) Local Action on Health Inequalities: Fuel Poverty and Cold Home Related Health Problems, Health Equity Briefing 7, September 2014.
  • 20. Department of Energy and Climate Change (2015) Cutting the cost of keeping warm: a fuel poverty strategy for England. Separtment of Enery & Climate Change. 3rd March 2015.
  • 21. WHO Regional Office for Europe (2004) Housing and Health, Health and environment briefing pamphlet series 41, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen.
  • 22. Marmot Review Team (2010) The Health Impacts of Cold Homes and Fuel Poverty. Friends of the Earth and the Marmot Review Team. University College London.
  • 23. Office for National Statistics (2014) Excess Winter Mortality in England and Wales 2014/15 (Provisional) and 2013/14 (Final). Available from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160105160709/http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_425192.pdf.
  • 24. Department of Health (2007) Health and winter warmth: reducing health inequalities.
  • 25. Collins K (2000) Cold, cold housing and respiratory illnesses. In: Rudge J, Nicol F, editors. Cutting the Cost of Cold: Affordable Warmth for Healthier Homes. Abingdon: E & FN Spon.
  • 26. Rudge J, Gilchrist R (2005) Excess winter morbidity among older people at risk of cold homes: a population-based study in a London borough. J Public Health 27: 353–358.    
  • 27. Williamson IJ, Martin CJ, McGill G, et al. (1997) Damp housing and asthma: a case-control study. Thorax 52: 229–234.    
  • 28. Green G, Gilbertson J (2008) Warm Front, Better Health: Health Impact Evaluation of the Warm Front Scheme. Sheffield, UK: Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University.
  • 29. NICE Guidelines (2015) EWDs and illness and health risks associated with cold homes. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng6.
  • 30. Age UK (2015) Still Cold: What next for older people in cold homes? Age UK. London.
  • 31. Energy Companies Obligation (2017) Energy Companies Oblilgation. Energy UK. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/energy-company-obligation-eco-help-to-heat.
  • 32. Independent Age (2017) Winter. Available from: https://www.independentage.org/information/health/healthy-living/winter.
  • 33. Salisbury C, Johnson L, Purdy S, et al. (2011) Epidemiology and impact of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract 61: e12–e21.    
  • 34. Wolfe JL, Starfield B, Anderson G (2002) Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 162: 2269–2276.    
  • 35. Durham County Council (2014) Joint Strategic Needs Assessment 2014: Summary Document. NHS North Durham CCG, NHS Durham Dales, Easington & Sedgefield CCG, County Durham Health and Wellbeing Board.
  • 36. Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E (2006) Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods 5: 1–11.
  • 37. Tobin GA, Begley CM (2004) Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. J Adv Nurs 48: 388–396.    


Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved