Tea Party Health Narratives and Belief Polarization: the Journey to Killing Grandma

Kristin Haltinner; Dilshani Sarathchandra

doi:10.3934/publichealth.2017.6.557

AIMS Public Health , 2017, 4(6): 557-578. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2017.6.557. Research article Special Issues

Export file:

Format

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
BibTex
Text

Content

Citation Only
Citation and Abstract

Tea Party Health Narratives and Belief Polarization: the Journey to Killing Grandma

Kristin Haltinner, Dilshani Sarathchandra

Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA

Received: , Accepted: , Published:

Special Issues: Cultural Narratives in Health

Abstract Full Text(HTML) Figure/Table Related pages

In the past decade the U.S. public has expressed varying degrees of skepticism about certain factual claims, and of “expertise” more broadly. Ideological and partisan belief polarization seems to have elevated public anxiety about topics ranging from climate change and vaccines to immigration and healthcare policy. Furthermore, polarized narratives about scientific, medical, and political topics have encouraged “directionally motivated cognition”, leading to a decline in institutional trust among some fractions of the U.S. political spectrum. Our case study of the Tea Party Patriots (TPP) (i.e. a political organization that promotes the Tea Party goals) uses data from 45 interviews, 80 hours of participant observation, and content analysis of movement literature, to examine the nature and nuance of health narratives employed by the Tea Party. Specifically, we explain a central narrative in TPP organizing that features “a villainous Left covertly seeking to harm U.S. citizens” as the root of three key TPP health care narratives: (1) Democratic health initiatives enslaving youth; (2) the political left profiting from covertly making Americans dependent on state’s health care programs; and (3) the left clandestinely seeking to violate the constitution as represented by their efforts to “kill grandma”. These narratives reflect the increased polarization of attitudes towards healthcare, as well as a broader distrust of the political left who, activists believe, are advancing a political agenda of social control. Ultimately, we argue that culturally driven healthcare narratives of the Tea Party have had a significant impact on right-wing public opinion and Republican politics regarding U.S. healthcare policy. Many Tea Party concerns are reflected in the Republican policy positions, including those related to the Affordable Care Act of 2010.

Figure/Table

Supplementary

Article Metrics

Keywords: political polarization; right-wing populism; Affordable Care Act; Obamacare

Citation: Kristin Haltinner, Dilshani Sarathchandra. Tea Party Health Narratives and Belief Polarization: the Journey to Killing Grandma. AIMS Public Health , 2017, 4(6): 557-578. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2017.6.557

References:

1. Rick Santelli's shout heard 'round the world'. CNBC [Internet]. 2009 Feb 22 [cited 2010 Jan 15] Available from: https://www.cnbc.com/id/29283701.
2. Burghart D (2012) View from the top. In: Rosenthal L, Trost C, Steep: The Precipitous Rise of the Tea Party. Berkeley: The University of California Press, 67-97.
3. Disch L (2012) The Tea Party: a 'White Citizenship' movement? In Rosenthal L, Trost C, Steep: The Precipitous Rise of the Tea Party. Berkeley: The University of California Press, 133-151.
4. Skocpol T, Williams V (2012) The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Babington C. Tea Party shaping Republican Party, fall faceoffs. U.S. News and World Report [Internet]. 2010 June 11 [cited 2017 June 4]. Available from: https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2010/06/11/tea-party-shaping-republican-party-fall-faceoffs.
6. Woodward C. Tea Party-backed platform sails through Maine GOP convention. Christian Science Monitor [Internet]. 2010 May 10 [cited 2017 June 4]. Available from: http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2010/0510/Tea-party-backed-platform-sails-through-Maine-GOP-convention.
7. Jonsson P. Amid harsh criticisms, 'Tea Party' slips into mainstream. The Christian Science Monitor [Internet]. 2010 April 3 [cited 2017 June 4]. Available from: http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2010/0403/Amid-harsh-criticisms-tea-party-slips-into-the-mainstream.
8. Saad L. Tea Partiers are fairly mainstream in their demographics [Internet]. Gallup. 2010 April 5 [cited 2017 June 4]. Available from: http://www.gallup.com/poll/127181/tea-partiers-fairly-mainstream-demographics.aspx.
9. Williams J. Tea Party anger reflects mainstream concerns. The Wall Street Journal [Internet]. 2010 April 2 [cited 2017 June 4]. Available from: https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304252704575155942054483252.
10. Bischoff L. GOP convention to show tea party influence. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution [Internet]. 2012 August 26 [cited 2017 November 22]. Available from: http://www.ajc.com/news/local/gop-convention-show-tea-party-influence/5zBd435C1tVh0DOIaWFETL/.
11. Greenhouse S. Strained states turning to laws to curb labor unions. New York Times [Internet]. 2011 Jan 3 [cited 2013 March 11] Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/04/business/04labor.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.
12. Haltinner K (2017) Trump's Tea Party. International Affairs Forum. 8: 44-47.
13. Szalay L, Kelly R (1982) Political ideology and subjective culture. Am Political Sci Rev 76: 585-602.
14. Feldman S, Zaller J (1992) The political culture of ambivalence. Am J Political Sci 36: 268-307.
15. Merelman R (1969) The development of political ideology. Am Political Sci Rev 63: 750-767.
16. Anson J, Pyszczynski T, Solomon S, et al. (2009) Political Ideology in the 21st Century. In: Jost J, Ray A, Thorisdottir H, Social and psychological basis of ideology and system justification. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
17. Kahan DM, Braman D (2003) More Statistics, Less Persuasion: A Cultural Theory of Gun-Risk Perceptions. Univ Pa Law Rev 151:1291-327.
18. Lord CG, Ross L, Lepper M (1979) Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: the effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. J Personal Soc Psychol 37: 2098-2109.
19. Brewer M (2005) The rise of partisanship and the expansion of partisan conflict within the American electorate. Political Res Q 58: 219-230.
20. Abramowitz A, Saunders K (2008) Is Polarization a Myth? J Politics 70: 542-555.
21. Evans JH (2002) Polarization in abortion attitudes in U.S. religious traditions, 1972–1998. Sociol Forum 17: 397-422.
22. McCright A, Dunlap R (2011) The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public's Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010. Sociol Q 52: 155-194.
23. Hamilton L, Hartter J, Saito K (2015) Trust in scientists on climate change and vaccines. SAGE Open 5.
24. Layman G, Carsey T, Horowitz J (2006) Party polarization in American politics. Annu Rev Political Sci 9: 83-110.
25. Fiorina M, Abrams S (2008) Political polarization in the American public. Annu Rev Political Sci 11: 563-88.
26. Gauchat G (2012) Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. Am Sociol Rev 77: 167-187.
27. Nyhan B (2010) Why the "death panel" myth wouldn't die: misinformation in the health care reform debate. Forum 8.
28. Taber C, Lodge M (2006) Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. Am J Political Sci 50: 755-769.
29. Flynn DJ, Nyhan B, Reifler J (2017) The nature and origins of misperceptions: understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Political Psychol 38: 127-150.
30. Cook J, Lewandowky S, Ecker UKH (2017) Neutralizing Misinformation Through Inoculation: Exposing Misleading Argumentation Techniques Reduces Their Influence. Plos One 12: e0175799.
31. Lewandowsky S, Ecker UKH, Seifert CM, et al. (2012) Misinformation and its correction: continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychol Sci Public Interest 13: 106-131.
32. Nyhan B, Reifler J (2010) When corrections fail: the persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behav 32: 303-330.
33. Lundskow G (2012) Authoritarianism and destructiveness in the tea party movement. Crit Sociol 38: 529-547.
34. United States Department of Commerce. Per capita personal income by state. Albuquerque, NM: Bureau of Economic Analysis and The University of New Mexico. 2013 [cited 2014 May 30. Available from: http://bber.unm.edu/econ/us-pci.htm.
35. Zeskind L (2012) A nation dispossessed: the Tea Party Movement and race. Crit Sociol 38: 495-509.
36. Parker C, Barreto M (2013) Change they can't believe in: the Tea Party and reactionary politics in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37. Berlet C (2012) Reframing populist resentments in the Tea Party Movement. In: Rosenthal L, Trost C, Steep: The Precipitous Rise of the Tea Party. Berkeley: The University of California Press, 47-66.
38. Silverman D (1985) Qualitative methodology and sociology: describing the social world. Aldershot, UK: Gower Publishing.
39. Garfinkel H (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
40. Holstein J, Gubrium J (2005) Interpretive practice. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, The sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 483-506.
41. Francis D, Hester S (2004) An invitation to ethnomethodology: language, society and interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Mills S (2003) Foucault. New York: Routledge.
43. Hall S (1997) Representation: cultural representation and signifying practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Kendall G, Wickham G (2003) Using Foucault's methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Silverman D (2004) Qualitative research: theory, method and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Pitcavage M (2001) Camouflage and conspiracy: the Militia Movement from Ruby Ridge to Y2K. Am Behav Sci 44: 957-981.
47. Blee K (2008) Women of the Klan. 2^nd Edition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
48. Aho J (1990) The Politics of righteousness. Seattle, WA: The University of Washington Press.
49. Ezekiel R (1995) The racist mind: portraits of American Neo-Nazis and Klansmen. New York: Penguin Books.
50. Haltinner K (2013) Enhancing activist commitment through frame alignment and the amplification of collective identity: how the Tea Party unites its divergent membership [dissertation]. [Minneapolis]: University of Minnesota.
51. Diamond S (1995) Roads to dominion. New York: Guilford Press.
52. Hardisty J (1999) Mobilizing resentment: conservative resurgence from the John Birch Society to the Promise Keepers. Boston: Beacon Press.
53. Iyer R, Koleva S, Graham J, et al. (2012) Understanding Libertarian morality: the psychological dispositions of self-identified Libertarians. PLoS One. 7: e42366.
54. Swindler A (1995) Cultural power and social movements. In: Johnson H, Klandermans B, Social movements and culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
55. Lofland J (1995) A methodology for frame analysis: from discourse to cognitive schematic. In: Johnson H, Klandermans B, Social movements and culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
56. Rochon TR (2000) Culture Moves. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
57. Gallup. Healthcare System [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 June 16]. Available from: http://www.gallup.com/poll/4708/healthcare-system.aspx.
58. Quigley W (1996) Work or starve: regulation of the poor in colonial America. Univ San Francisco Law Rev 31: 35-83.
59. Heller J (2008) The vaccine narrative. Nashville, T.N.: Vanderbilt University Press.
60. Jones G, Kantarjian H (2015) Health care in the United States-basic human right or entitlement? Ann Oncol 26: 2193-2195.
61. Katz M (1989) The undeserving poor. New York: Pantheon Books.
62. Manacorda M, Moretti E (2006) Why do most Italian youths live with their parents? J Eur Econ Assoc 4: 800-829.
63. Becker S, Bentolila S, Fernandes A, et al. (2010) Youth emancipation and perceived job insecurity of parents and children. J Popul Econ 3: 1047-1071.
64. Harris E, Mok S. How CBO Estimates the Effects of the Affordable Care Act on the Labor Market. 2015 [cited 2017 June 16]. Available from: https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/114th-congress-2015-2016/workingpaper/51065-acalabormarketeffectswp.pdf.
65. Poletta F (1998) Contending stories. Qual Sociol 21: 419-446.
66. Hofstadter R (1965) The paranoid style in American politics, and other essays. New York: Knopf.
67. Rosenthal L, Trost C (2012) Steep: the precipitous rise of the Tea Party. Berkeley: University of California Press.
68. U.S. Const. amend. I.
69. Jefferson T. Letter to the Danbury Baptists. Library of Congress [Internet]. 1802 [cited 2017 June 15] Available from: https://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/9806/danpre.html.
70. Everson v. Board of Education. 330 U.S. 1 (1947). Available from: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/330/1/case.html.
71. Reynolds v. United States. 98 U.S. 145 (1879). Available from: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1104642225155375579&hl=en&as_sdt=6&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr.
72. Roy A. The Tea Party's plan for replacing Obamacare. Forbes [Internet]. 2012 April 7 [cited 2017 June 15] Available from: https://www.forbes.com/forbes/welcome/?toURL=https://www.forbes.com/sites/aroy/2012/04/07/the-tea-partys-plan-for-replacing-obamacare/&refURL=https://www.google.com/&referrer=https://www.google.com/.
73. Linker D. The GOP's healthcare fantasy is a libertarian delusion [Internet]. The Week [Internet]. 2017 May 9 [cited 2017 July 6] Available from: http://theweek.com/articles/697336/gops-healthcare-fantasy-libertarian-delusion.
74. Pear R. What's in the AHCA: the major provisions of the Republican health bill. New York Times [Internet]. 2017 May 4 [cited 2017 June 15] Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/04/us/politics/major-provisions-republican-health-care-bill.html?_r=0.
75. Kaiser Family Foundation. Summary of the Better Care Reconciliation Act of [Internet]. 2017 July 13 [cited 2017 September 11] Available from: KFF 2017: http://files.kff.org/attachment/Summary-of-the-Better-Care-Reconciliation-Act.
76. Tea Party Patriots. Healthcare [Internet]. 2017 June 6 [cited 2017 June 6] Available from: https://www.teapartypatriots.org/ourvision/healthcare/.
77. Gallup. Government, Healthcare Most Important Problems in U.S. [Internet]. 2017 August 10 [cited 2017 September 11] Available from: http://www.gallup.com/poll/215645/government-healthcare-important-problems.aspx?g_source=ACA&g_medium=search&g_campaign=tiles.
78. Gallup. The Art of the Deal on Healthcare: Repeal vs. Repair [Internet]. 2017 April 11 [cited 2017 September 11] Available from: http://www.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/208421/art-deal-healthcare-repeal-repair.aspx?g_source=ACA&g_medium=search&g_campaign=tiles.
79. Gallup. Public Gives Congress No Clear Guidance on ACA Reform [Internet]. 2017 July 11 [cited 2017 September 11] Available from: http://www.gallup.com/poll/213890/public-gives-congress-no-clear-guidance-aca-reform.aspx?g_source=ACA&g_medium=search&g_campaign=tiles.
80. Norman J. In U.S., Support for Tea Party Drops to New Low. Gallup News. 2015 October 26 [cited 2017 September 16]. Available from: http://news.gallup.com/poll/186338/support-tea-party-drops-new-low.aspx.
81. Green M (2006) Narratives and Cancer Communication. J Commun 56: 163-183.
82. Shen F, Sheer V, Li R (2015) Impact of Narratives on Persuasion in Health Communication: A Meta-Analysis. J Advert 44: 105-113.

show all references

This article has been cited by:

1. Kristin Haltinner, Dilshani Sarathchandra, Climate change skepticism as a psychological coping strategy, Sociology Compass, 2018, e12586, 10.1111/soc4.12586

Reader Comments

your name: * your email: *

Copyright Info: 2017, Kristin Haltinner, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Associated material

Metrics