Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Sport for Development and Global Public Health Issues: A Case Study of National Sports Associations

University of Edinburgh, Moray House School of Education, Institute of Sport, PE and Health Science, St Leonard’s Place, Edinburgh, EH8 8AQ, United Kingdom

Special Issues: Sports-Based Health Interventions

Sport is widely recognised for the contribution it can make to international development goals. More specifically, the value of sport as a tool for development gained its impetus through the HIV/AIDS pandemic in sub-Saharan Africa. The institutionalized relationship between sport and development has mainly focussed on sport-for-development (SfD) non-governmental organisations (NGOs). This study proposed to examine the response of National Sports Associations (NSAs) towards the multisectoral approach for HIV/AIDS prevention in Zambia. The study draws on lessons learnt from how NSAs within a resource-scarce or low-income country responded to a health pandemic. While public health was previously a state and health sector preserve, the impact of HIV/AIDS pandemic influenced not only the way that a pandemic is managed but also other public health issues. A case study approach was adopted comprising of three National Sports Associations (NSAs) as units of analysis. The study utilised semi-structured interviews, documentary analysis and field observations to gain perspectives on how each NSA mainstreamed and implemented work-based health programmes. Using governance and policy network theories, the paper discusses each NSAs’ role in the governance and implementation of a multisectoral approach to a health pandemic. The findings identified lack of engagement of sports agencies at strategic decision-making level, marginalisation of sport by other sectors, and variations in implementation patterns among sports agencies. Further findings indicate that lack of resources among government sport agencies or departments limited their involvement with other state or non-state actors in strategic level meetings or health policy networks. Resource-scarce conditions placed limitations on the political steer of state actors while non-state actors with foreign resources attracted collaboration from other public health policy networks.
  Article Metrics

Keywords HIV/AIDS; multisectoral approach; sport-for-development; governance; HIV/AIDS mainstreaming; Top-down; Bottom-up; nongovernmental organisation; policy network theory

Citation: Davies Banda. Sport for Development and Global Public Health Issues: A Case Study of National Sports Associations. AIMS Public Health , 2017, 4(3): 240-257. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2017.3.240


  • 1. Green BC (2008). Sport as an agent for social and personal change. In V. Girginov (Ed.), Management of sport development (129-146). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
  • 2. Levermore R (2008) Sport: A New Engine of Development, Prog Dev Stud 8: 193-190
  • 3. Black DR (2010) The Ambiguities of Development: Implications for Development through Sport. Sport in Soc 13: 121-129.
  • 4. Darnell SC and Black DR (2011) Mainstreaming Sport into International Development Studies. Third World Quart 32: 367-378.    
  • 5. Lindsey I, Kay T, Jeanes R, et al. (2017) Localizing Global Sport for Development. Manchester University Press.
  • 6. Kidd B (2008) A New Social Movement: Sport for Development and Peace. Sport in Soc 11: 370-380.    
  • 7. United Nations Inter-Agency Task Force on Sport for Development and Peace (2003), Sport for Development and Peace: Towards Achieving the Millennium Development Goals, Geneva: United Nations.
  • 8. Commonwealth Secretariat (2014), Strengthening Sport for Development and Peace: National Policies and Strategies, London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
  • 9. Levermore R and Beacom A (2009) Sport and Development: Mapping the Field, in R. Levermore and A. Beacom (eds.), Sport and International Development, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • 10. Coalter F (2006). Sport-in-Development: A monitoring and evaluation manual. Available from: http://www.sportanddev.org/en/toolkit/?uNewsID=17.
  • 11. Zakus D, Njelesani D, Darnell SC (2007) The use of sport and physical activity to achieve health objectives in Sport for Development and Peace International Working Group (ed.) Literature Reviews on Sport for Development and Peace. Toronto: University of Toronto , 7-47.
  • 12. National AIDS Council & Ministry of Health (NAC/MoH) (2008). Zambia Country Report: Multisectoral AIDS Response Monitoring and Evaluation Biennial Report 2006-2007. Declaration Of Commitment Submitted To The United Nations General Assembly Special Session On AIDS. Lusaka: National AIDS Council/Ministry of Health.
  • 13. Spaaij R (2012) Building Social and Cultural Capital among Young People in Disadvantaged Communities: Lessons from a Brazilian Sport-based Intervention Program. Sport, Educ and Soc 17: 77-95.    
  • 14. Cornelissen S (2011) More than a Sporting Chance? Appraising the Sport for Development Legacy of the 2010 FIFA World Cup. Third World Quart, 32: 503-529.
  • 15. Coalter F (2010) The politics of sport-for-development: Limited focus programmes and broad gauge problems? Int Rev Soc Sport 45: 295–314.    
  • 16. Lindsey I and Banda D (2011) Sport and the Fight against HIV/AIDS in Zambia: A Partnership Approach? Int Rev Sociol Sport 46: 90-107.    
  • 17. Jeanes R (2013) Educating through Sport? Examining HIV/AIDS Education and Sport-for-Development through the Perspectives of Zambian Young People. Sport, Educ and Soc 18: 388-406.
  • 18. Mwaanga O (2003) HIV/AIDS At-risk Adolescent Girls' Empowerment through Participation in Top Level Football and Edusport in Zambia, MSc Thesis, Institute of Social Science at the Norwegian University of Sport and PE, Oslo.
  • 19. Dixey R (2014) After Nairobi: can the international community help to develop health promotion in Africa? Health Promotion Int 29: 185-194.    
  • 20. Coalter F (2007) A Wider Role for Sport: Who's Keeping the Score? London: Routledge.
  • 21. McCormack JB and Chalip L (1988). Sport as socialization: A critique of methodological premises. Soc Sci J 25: 83–92.
  • 22. Collins M (2010) "Sport for good" to "sport for sport's sake"–not a good move for sports. Int J Sport Pol 2: 367-379.
  • 23. Jeanes R and Magee J (2014) Promoting Gender Empowerment through Sport? Exploring the Experiences of Zambian Female Footballers, In N. Schulenkorf and D. Adair (eds), Global Sport for Developmen: Critical Perspectives, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 134-154.
  • 24. Banda D (2010) Zambia: Government's Role in Colonial and Modern Times, Int J Sport Pol 2: 237-252.
  • 25. Kelly K and Birdsall K (2010) The effects of national and international HIV/AIDS funding and governance mechanisms on the development of civil society responses to HIV/AIDS in East and Southern Africa. AIDS Care 22: 1580-1587.    
  • 26. Gilson L, Sen PD, Mohammed S, et al. (1994) The potential of health sector non-governmental organizations: policy options. Health Policy Plan 9: 14-24.    
  • 27. Laird SE (2007) Rolling Back the African State: Implications for Social Development in Ghana. Sol Policy & Adm 41: 465-486.
  • 28. Bebbington A and Riddell R (1997) Heavy Hands, Hidden Hands, Holding Hands? Donors, Intermediary NGOs and Civil Society Organisations, In D. Hulme and M. Edwards (eds) NGOs, States and Donors: Too Close for Comfort? Basingstoke: MacMillan, 107-127.
  • 29. Zaidi SA (1999) NGO Failure and the Need to Bring Back the State, J Int Dev 11: 259-271.
  • 30. Hulme D and Edwards M (1997) NGOs, States and Donors: An Overview, in D. Hulme and M. Edwards (eds.), NGOs, States and Donors: Too Close for Comfort? Basingstoke: MacMillan.
  • 31. Hershey M (2013) Explaining the Non-governmental Organization (NGO) Boom: the Case of HIV/AIDS NGOs in Kenya. J Eastern African Stu 7: 671-690,    
  • 32. Wilson B and Hayhurst L (2009) Digital Activism: Neoliberalism, the Internet, and Sport for Youth Development. Soc Sport J 26: 155-181.    
  • 33. Kidd B (2008) A new social movement: sport for development and peace. Sport in Soc 11: 370-380.    
  • 34. UNAIDS (2005) Three Ones' in Action: where are we and where we go from here. Geneva, Switzerland.
  • 35. Morah E and Ihalainen M (2009) National AIDS Commissions in Africa: performance and emerging challenges. Dev Pol Rev 27: 185-214.    
  • 36. Houlihan B (2005) Public Sector Sport Policy: Developing a Framework for Analysis. Int Rev Sociol Sport 40: 163-185.    
  • 37. Lindsey I, Jeanes R, Lihaya H (2016) Sport development policy In Managing sport development: an international approach. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge 45-60.
  • 38. Hein W, Bartsch S, Kohlmorgen L (Eds) (2007) Global health governance and the fight against HIV/AIDS. London, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • 39. Buse K and Walt G (2000) Global public private partnerships: Part I - a new development in health? Bull W H O 7: 549-561.
  • 40. Kooiman J (1993) Modern Governance. London, Sage Publications.
  • 41. Rose, N. Government (2005) In: T. Bennett., L. Grossberg and M. Morris (Eds) New Keywords: a revised vocabulary of culture and society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 151-153.
  • 42. Rhodes RAW (1994) The hollowing-out of the state, Polit Q 65: 138-51.
  • 43. Bevir M and Rhodes RAW (2001) Decentring British Governance: From Bureaucracy To Networks, UC Berkeley, Institute of Governmental Studies.
  • 44. Rhodes RAW (2007) Understanding Governance: Ten Years On. Organ Stud 2: 1243-1264.
  • 45. Klijn EH and Koppenjan JFM (2000) Public Management and Policy Networks: Foundations of a network approach to governance. Pub Manag 2: 135-158.    
  • 46. Bell S and Hindmoor A (2009) The governance of public affairs. J Pub Aff 9: 149-159.    
  • 47. Poku N (2001) Africa's AIDS Crisis in Context: How the Poor are dying. Third World Q 22: 191-204.    
  • 48. Howlett M, Rayner J, Tollefson C (2009) From government to governance in forest planning? Lessons from the case of the British Columbia Great Bear Rainforest initiative. For Policy and Econ 11: 383-391.
  • 49. Adam S and Kriesi H (2007) The Network Approach in P.A. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process, Boulder, 143–146.
  • 50. Marsh D and Rhodes RAW (1992) Policy Communities and Issue Networks: Beyond Typology: In Marsh D, Rhodes RAW Policy Networks in British Government Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 51. Yin RK (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London, Sage.
  • 52. Fielding N and Thomas H (2001) Qualitative Interviewing, In: N. Gilbert, (Ed) Researching Social Life. London, Sage.
  • 53. National AIDS Council (2006) National HIV and AIDS Strategic Framework 2006-2010, Lusaka, NAC.
  • 54. National AIDS Council (2010) National HIV and AIDS Strategic Framework 2011-2015. Lusaka, NAC.
  • 55. Jupp V (2006) The SAGE dictionary of social research methods. London, Sage, 76-77.
  • 56. Patton MQ (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res 34: 1189-1208
  • 57. Glaser BG, Strauss, AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago: Aldine De Gruyter.
  • 58. UNAIDS (2001) Together we can: Leadership in a world of AIDS. UNAIDS. June 2001.
  • 59. Ministry of Sport, Youth and Child Development (MSYCD) (2009), National Sports Policy, Lusaka: Department of Sport.
  • 60. Heclo H (1978) Issue networks and the executive establishment. In A King The New American Political System Washington: American Enterprise Institute 87–124.
  • 61. FIFA Medical Assessment and Research Centre (F-MARC). (2012) FIFA 11 for Health Coach's Manual. Zurich, Switzerland.
  • 62. Forde SD (2013) Fear and Loathing in Lesotho: An Autoethnographic analysis of Sport for Development and Peace. Int Rev Sociol Sport 50: 958-973.


This article has been cited by

  • 1. L. Keane, J. Negin, N. Latu, L. Reece, A. Bauman, J. Richards, ‘Governance’, ‘communication’, ‘capacity’, ‘champions’ and ‘alignment’: factors underpinning the integration of sport-for-development within national development priorities in Tonga, Sport in Society, 2019, 1, 10.1080/17430437.2019.1678590
  • 2. Iain Lindsey, Tony Chapman, Oliver Dudfield, Configuring relationships between state and non-state actors: a new conceptual approach for sport and development, International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 2019, 1, 10.1080/19406940.2019.1676812

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

Copyright Info: 2017, Davies Banda, licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved