Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Is Team Sport the Key to Getting Everybody Active, Every Day? A Systematic Review of Physical Activity Interventions Aimed at Increasing Girls’ Participation in Team Sport

1. Public Health England, Gloucester, GL1 3NN, UK
2. Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK

Special Issues: Sports-Based Health Interventions

Background: It is estimated that 21% of boys and 16% of girls in England meet recommended physical activity guidelines. Team sport has the potential to increase physical activity levels; however, studies show that gender-based factors can influence girls’ participation in team sport. Furthermore, evidence for the effectiveness of interventions promoting team sport among girls is limited. This systematic review aimed to assess the impact of physical activity interventions on secondary school-aged girls’ (aged 11-18 years) participation in team sport and to identify potential strategies for increasing participation. Methods: Electronic databases and grey literature were systematically searched for studies of interventions targeting team sport participation among girls in the UK. Results were exported to Refworks, duplicates removed and eligible studies identified. Extracted data included: participant details, such as sample size and age; components of the intervention; outcomes assessed; and each study was quality appraised. Due to heterogeneity across studies, results were presented narratively. Results: Four studies sourced from the grey literature met the inclusion criteria. Findings suggest that physical activity interventions can encourage girls to try new sports, but evidence is limited in relation to sustained participation. Potential strategies for promoting participation included: consultation with girls, implementation of appropriate peer-leaders and friendship group strategies, early intervention and consideration of intervention setting. Conclusions: This review highlights the limited availability of evidence on the effectiveness of physical activity interventions for promoting team sport participation among girls in the UK. Findings indicate that future research is needed to improve the methodological quality of complex intervention evaluation. Physical activity interventions may have the potential to encourage girls to try team sport, but their impact on sustained participation, and subsequent physical activity outcomes, is less apparent.
  Article Metrics

Keywords team sport; health promotion; physical activity; systematic review; adolescent girls; gender inequality

Citation: Rosalie Allison, Emma L. Bird, Stuart McClean. Is Team Sport the Key to Getting Everybody Active, Every Day? A Systematic Review of Physical Activity Interventions Aimed at Increasing Girls’ Participation in Team Sport. AIMS Public Health , 2017, 4(2): 202-220. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2017.2.202


  • 1. Kohl HW, Craig CL, Lambert EV, et al. (2012) The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. The Lancet 380: 294-305.    
  • 2. Committee PAGA (2008) Physical activity guidelines advisory committee report, 2008. Wash, DC: USDep Health and Hum Serv 2008: A1-H14.
  • 3. Zieske AW, Malcom GT, Strong JP (2002) Natural history and risk factors of atherosclerosis in children and youth: the PDAY study. PediatrPathol Mol Med 21: 213-237.
  • 4. Jamner MS, Spruijt-Metz D, Bassin S, et al. (2004) A controlled evaluation of a school-based intervention to promote physical activity among sedentary adolescent females: project FAB. J Adolesc Health 34: 279-289.    
  • 5. Webber LS, Catellier DJ, Lytle LA, et al. (2008) Promoting physical activity in middle school girls: Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls. AmJ Prev Med 34: 173-184.    
  • 6. Oja P and Titze S (2011) Physical activity recommendations for public health: development and policy context. EPMA J 2: 253.    
  • 7. Townsend N, Wickramasinghe K, Williams J, et al. (2015) Physical Activity Statistics 2015. London: British Heart Foundation.
  • 8. Currie C, Molcho M, Boyce W, et al. (2008) Researching health inequalities in adolescents: the development of the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) family affluence scale. SocSci & Med 66: 1429-1436.
  • 9. Camacho-Miñano MJ, LaVoi NM, Barr-Anderson DJ (2011) Interventions to promote physical activity among young and adolescent girls: a systematic review. HealthEduc Res 26: 1025-1049.
  • 10. Sabo D and Veliz P (2008) Go Out and Play: Youth Sports in America. Women's Sports Foundation.
  • 11. SportScotland (2008) Barriers to women and girls' participation in sport and physical activity.
  • 12. Laird Y, Fawkner S, Kelly P, et al. (2016) The role of social support on physical activity behaviour in adolescent girls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13: 79.    
  • 13. Mears R, Jago R (2016) Effectiveness of after-school interventions at increasing moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels in 5-to 18-year olds: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med: bjsports-2015-094976.
  • 14. Pate RR, Ward DS, Saunders RP, et al. (2005) Promotion of physical activity among high-school girls: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health 95: 1582-1587.    
  • 15. Schneider M, Cooper DM (2011) Enjoyment of exercise moderates the impact of a school-based physical activity intervention. Int JBehav Nutr and Phys Act 8: 1.    
  • 16. Eime R, Sawyer N, Harvey J, et al. (2015) Integrating public health and sport management: sport participation trends 2001–2010. SportManag Rev 18: 207-217.
  • 17. Fourie A, Surujlal J (2011) Developing learners' life skills through sport: Perceptions of coaches. Afr J Phys, Health Educ, Recreat and Dance 17: 314-329.
  • 18. Goudas M, Giannoudis G (2008) A team-sports-based life-skills program in a physical education context. Learn andinstr 18: 528-536.    
  • 19. Metcalf B, Henley W, Wilkin T (2012) Effectiveness of intervention on physical activity of children: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials with objectively measured outcomes (EarlyBird 54).
  • 20. Cavill N, Richardson D, Foster C (2012) Improving health through participation in sport: a review of research and practice. British Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research Group University of Oxford.
  • 21. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. AnnInternMed 151: W-65-W-94.
  • 22. Pope C, Mays N, Popay J (2007) Synthesising Qualitative and Quantitative Health Evidence: A Guide to Methods: A Guide to Methods: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
  • 23. CASP UK (2013) CASP checklists.
  • 24. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2012) Appendix F Quality appraisal checklist – quantitative intervention studies. PMG4.
  • 25. The University of Auckland (2013) 2013 Evidence based practice and critical appraisal.
  • 26. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Critical Appraisal Tools. University of Oxford.
  • 27. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, et al. (2006) Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. APro from the ESRCMethodsProgramm Vers 1: b92.
  • 28. Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J (2012) An introduction to systematic reviews: Sage.
  • 29. Petticrew M, Roberts H (2008) Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide: John Wiley & Sons.
  • 30. Inchley J, Mitchell F, Kirby J, et al. (2012) Fit for Girls evaluation Child and Adolescent Health Research Unit, University of St Andrews.
  • 31. Taylor J (2008) Evaluation of the "Girls on the Move" Programme: Summary Report. Department of Sports Studies, University of Stirling.
  • 32. Hills L, Maitland A, Croston A (2013) Us Girls: Engaging Young Women from Disadvantaged Communities in Sport. Brunel University.
  • 33. Sport Structures Ltd (2013) Sportivate Programme Evaluation.
  • 34. Weed M, Coren E, Fiore J, et al. (2012) Developing a physical activity legacy from the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games: a policy-led systematic review. PerspectPub Health 132: 75-80.
  • 35. Inchley J (2015) Correspondence from Dr. Inchley in regards to: "Fit For Girls'.
  • 36. Harrington D (2015) Email from "Getting Girls Active' correspondent.
  • 37. Godin K, Stapleton J, Kirkpatrick SI, et al. (2015) Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada. Syst Rev 4: 138.    
  • 38. Department of Health (2015) Public Health England Strategic Remit & Priorities.
  • 39. Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Boyce WF, et al. (2005) Comparison of overweight and obesity prevalence in school‐aged youth from 34 countries and their relationships with physical activity and dietary patterns. ObesRev 6: 123-132.


This article has been cited by

  • 1. Rochelle Eime, Meghan Casey, Jack Harvey, , Developing Sport for Women and Girls, 2020, 19, 10.4324/9780367854201-3
  • 2. Chelsea L Kracht, Susan B Sisson, Sibling influence on children’s objectively measured physical activity: a meta-analysis and systematic review, BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 2018, 4, 1, e000405, 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000405

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

Copyright Info: 2017, Rosalie Allison, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved