Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Modifying Older Adults’ Daily Sedentary Behaviour Using an Asset-based Solution: Views from Older Adults

1 Glasgow Caledonian University, School of Health and Life Sciences, Institute of Applied Health Research, Glasgow, UK
2 Umea University, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umea, Sweden
3 Glasgow School for Business and Society, Department of Social Sciences, Media and Journalism Glasgow, UK

Special Issues: Advances in sedentary behavior research and translation

Objective: There is a growing public health focus on the promotion of successful and active ageing. Interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour (SB) in older adults are feasible and are improved by tailoring to individuals’ context and circumstances. SB is ubiquitous; therefore part of the tailoring process is to ensure individuals’ daily sedentary routine can be modified. The aim of this study was to understand the views of older adults and identify important considerations when creating a solution to modify daily sedentary patterns. Method: This was a qualitative research study. Fifteen older adult volunteers (mean age = 78 years) participated in 1 of 4 focus groups to identify solutions to modify daily sedentary routine. Two researchers conducted the focus groups whilst a third took detailed fieldnotes on a flipchart to member check the findings. Data were recorded and analysed thematically. Results: Participants wanted a solution with a range of options which could be tailored to individual needs and circumstances. The strategy suggested was to use the activities of daily routine and reasons why individuals already naturally interrupting their SB, collectively framed as assets. These assets were categorised into 5 sub-themes: physical assets (eg. standing up to reduce stiffness); psychological assets (eg. standing up to reduce feelings of guilt); interpersonal assets
(eg. standing up to answer the phone); knowledge assets (eg. standing up due to knowing the benefits of breaking SB) and activities of daily living assets (eg. standing up to get a drink). Conclusion: This study provides important considerations from older adults’ perspectives to modify their daily sedentary patterns. The assets identified by participants could be used to co-create a tailored intervention with older adults to reduce SB, which may increase effectiveness and adherence.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

References

1. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, et al. (2012) Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet 380: 247-257.    

2. Yates T , Wilmot EG, Davies MJ, et al. (2011) Sedentary behavior: What’s in a definition? Am J Prev Med 40: e33-e34.    

3. Henson J, Yates T, Biddle SJH, et al. (2013) Associations of objectively measured sedentary behaviour and physical activity with markers of cardiometabolic health. Diabetologia 56: 1012-1020.

4. Teychenne M, Ball K, Salmon J (2010) Sedentary behavior and depression among adults: A review. Int J Behav Med 17: 246-254.

5. Van der Ploeg HP, Chey T, Korda RJ, et al. (2012) Sitting time and all-cause mortality risk in 222 497 Australian adults. Arch Intern Med 172: 494-500.

6. The Conference Board of Canada: The economic impact of reducing physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour. The Conference Board of Canada, 2014. Available from: http://sportmatters.ca/sites/default/files/content/moving_ahead_economic_impact_en.pdf

7. Dogra S, Stathokostas L (2012) Sedentary behavior and physical activity are independent predictors of successful aging in middle-aged and older adults. J Aging Res 2012: 1-8.

8. Department of Health. Start active, stay active: a report on physical activity from the four home countries’ Chief Medical Officers. London, Department of Health, 2011.

9. Matthews CE, Chen KY, Freedson PS, et al. (2008) Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003–2004. Am J Epidemiol 167: 875-881.

10. Harvey JA, Chastin SFM, Skelton DA (2013) Prevalence of sedentary behavior in older adults: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 10: 6645-6661.

11. Gardiner PA, Eakin EG, Healy GN, et al. (2011) Feasibility of reducing older adults’ sedentary time. Am J Prev Med 41: 174-177.

12. Fitzsimons CF, Kirk A, Baker G, et al. (2013) Using an individualised consultation and activPALTM feedback to reduce sedentary time in older Scottish adults: Results of a feasibility and pilot study. Prev Med 57, 718-720.

13. Rimer BK, Kreuter MW (2006) Advancing Tailored Health Communication: A Persuasion and Message Effects Perspective. J Commun 56: S184-S201.

14. Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS (2007) Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull 133: 673-693.

15. Krebs P, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS(2010)A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med 51: 214-221.

16. Chastin SFM, Buck C, Freiberger E, et al. (2015) Systematic literature review of determinants of sedentary behaviour in older adults: a DEDIPAC study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 12: 127-138.

17. Chastin SFM, Fitzpatrick N, Andrews M, et al. (2014) Determinants of sedentary behavior, motivation, barriers and strategies to reduce sitting time in older women: a qualitative investigation. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11: 773-791.

18. Greenwood-Hickman MA, Renz A, Rosenberg DE (2016) Motivators and Barriers to Reducing Sedentary Behavior Among Overweight and Obese Older Adults. Gerontologist 56: 660-668.

19. Sartini C, Wannamethee SG, Iliffe S, et al. (2015) Diurnal patterns of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older men. BMC Public Health 15: 609.

20. Onwuegbuzie AJ, Dickinson WB, Leech NL, et al. (2009) Toward more rigor in focus group research: A new framework for collecting and analyzing focus group data. Int J Qual Method 8: 1-21.

21. Visser M, Koster A (2013) Development of a questionnaire to assess sedentary time in older persons - a comparative study using accelerometry. BMC Geriatr 13: 80.

22. The Scottish Government. Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2012: A National Statistics Publication for Scotland 18 December 2012, Edinburgh, The Scottish Government, 2012.

23. Carlson JA (2010) Avoiding Traps in Member Checking. Qual Rep 15: 1102-1113.

24. Kitzinger J, Barbour R (1999) Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice. London: Sage Publications.

25. Holliday A (2006) Doing and writing qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.

26. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3: 77-101.

27. Kuckartz U (2014) Qualitative Text Analysis. London: Sage Publications

28. Aronson J (1994) A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. Qual Rep 2: 3.

29. Burnard P, Gill P, Stewart K, et al. (2008) Analysing and presenting qualitative data. Br Dent J 204: 429-432.

30. Antonovsky A (1996) The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promot Int 11: 11-18.

31. Richard L, Gauvin L, Raine K (2011) Ecological models revisited: their uses and evolution in health promotion over two decades. Annu Rev Public Health 32: 307-326.

32. Approach C, Stokols D, Grzywacz JG, et al. (2003) Human Environments. Am J Heal Promot 18: 4-14.

33. Michie S, Van Stralen MM, West R (2011) The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci 6: 42.

34. Leask CF, Harvey JA, Skelton DA, et al. (2015) Exploring the context of sedentary behaviour in older adults (what, where, why, when and with whom). Eur Rev Ageing Phys Act 12.

35. Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews C E, et al. (2010) Too much sitting: the population-health science of sedentary behavior. Ex Sport Sci Revires 38: 105-113.

36. Nicolai S, Benzinger P, Skelton DA, et al. (2010) Day-to-day variability of physical activity of older adults living in the community. J Aging Phys Act 18: 75-86.

37. Clemson L, Singh MAF, Bundy A, et al. (2012) Integration of balance and strength training into daily life activity to reduce rate of falls in older people (the LiFE study): randomised parallel trial. BMJ 345: e4547.

Copyright Info: © 2016, Calum F Leask, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved