Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Assessing the Construct Validity and Reliability of School Health Records Using the ‘Health Dialogue Questionnaire’ in the Eleventh Grade

1 Department of Nursing Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden
2 Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden

The aim for this study was to assess the construct validity and reliability of the Health Dialogue Questionnaire (HDQ©) for eleventh grade in school through comparison of the HDQ© with Paediatric Quality Of Life Inventory (PedsQLTM), Local monitoring of youth policy questionnaire (LUPP®), Health behaviour in Swedish school-aged children (HBSC©), Equal health (EH©) and The Swedish Survey Youth on Alcohol Consumption (SSYAC©). Methods: Cross-sectional samples of eleventh graders from the academic year 2009/2010 was used from the HDQ© (n = 2752), the HBSC© (n = 2090), the PedsQLTM (n = 666), the “LUPP®” questionnaires (n = 2400), EH© (n = 258), and SSYAC© (n = 1748) in the academic year 2009/2010. A comparison between HDQ© and the different proxies was done. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed as well as a Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix (MTMM), in order to evaluate the construct validity and reliability of HDQ©. Results: An average disagreement between HDQ© and proxies with 10 percentages was found. Exploratory factor analysis of HDQ© on the 2009/2010 sample suggested a four factor solution (girls factor solution 65% of total variance explained, and in the boys’ solution 59% of total variance explained). A second sample 2010/2011 of eleventh graders were used for the confirmatory solution. Almost perfectly similar four factor solutions with were found (girls 58% of total variance explained and boys 56% of the total variance explained). Using MTMM the reliability was generally high and HDQ© and showed agreeable validity. Discussion and conclusions: The HDQ© questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring eleventh graders self-reported-health in school.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

References

1. Ikuenobe P. (2006, 2015) African Communalism, A Moral View of Selfhood, and Relational Autonomy. Philosophical Perspectives on Communalism and Morality i african Traditions: Lexington Books.

2. Holmström MR, Olofsson N, Kristiansen L. (2013) Assessing the validity and reliability of the 'Health Dialogue' in 10-year-olds. Br J Sch Nurs 8: 9.    

3. Berg-Kelly K. (2010) Transition: bridge over troubled water? Acta Paediatr 99: 1782-1784.    

4. Berg-Kelly K. (2003) Adolescent health, school health activities, community contexts, and health surveys in Sweden. J Adolesc Health 33: 226-230.    

5. Olofsson N, Holmstrom MR, Kristiansen L. (2015) Assessing the Construct Validity and Reliability of School Health records of the Health Dialogue Questionnaire in 7th grade in Compulsory School. MOJ Public Health 2.

6. Petersen S. (2010) Child and Adolescent Mental health in Sweden. A systematic Review of Literature with emphasis on Change over time. Stockholm.

7. Landstedt E, Gillander GK. (2011) Deliberate self-harm and associated factors in 17-year-old Swedish students. Scand J Public Health 39: 17-25.

8. Acts SAo (2010) The Education Act. In: Acts SAo, editor. 1985:1100. Stockholm.

9. Holmstrom MR, Olofsson N, Asplund K, et al. (2014) Transitions in the Swedish school system and the impact on student's positive self-reported-health. BMC Public Health 14: 1045.    

10. Holmström MR, Olofsson N, Kristiansen L, et al. (2012) Health among 6-year-old children in a Swedish county: based on the Health dialogue. Vulnerable Groups & Inclusion.

11. Holmström MR, Olofsson N, Asplund K, et al. (2012) Exploring the development of school children's health. Br J Sch Nurs 7: 183-190.

12. StatisticsSweden (2014) Statistical Database. Statistics Sweden.

13. Jonsson M, Wickberg C, Björ O. (2001) The Health Dialogue-an opportunity to gain knowledge of children and young peoples' health. A pilot project in Härnösand. Härnösand.

14. King A, Wold B, Tudor-Smith C, et al. (1996) The health of youth. A cross-national survey. WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser 69: 1-222.

15. Varni JW, Seid M, Rode CA. (1999) The PedsQL: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. Med Care 37: 126-139.    

16. Varni JW, Burwinkle TM, Seid M, et al. (2003) The PedsQL 4.0 as a pediatric population health measure: feasibility, reliability, and validity. Ambul Pediatr 3: 329-341.

17. LUPP (2015) The Swedish Agency for Youth and Civil Society's LUPP® survey.

18. StatisticsSweden (2010) Technical Report; Health on Equal terms. Stockholm.

19. Raninen J, Livingston M, Leifman H. (2014) Declining trends in alcohol consumption among Swedish youth-does the theory of collectivity of drinking cultures apply? Alcohol Alcohol 49: 681-686.

20. Fayers PM, Machin D. (2000) Quality of Life: Assessment, analysis and Interpretation. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. 404 p.

21. Osgood CE, Suci GJ, Tannenbaum PH. (1957) The measurement of meaning. Champaign, IL, US: Univerity of Illinois Press.

22. Costello AB, Osborne JW. (2005) Best Practises in exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations fr Getting the Most From Your Analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 10.

23. Tavakol M, Dennick R. (2011) Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ 53-55.

24. Campbell DT, Fiske DW. (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bullitin 56: 81-105.    

25. Langer DA, Wood JJ, Bergman RL, et al. (2010) A multitrait-multimethod analysis of the construct validity of child anxiety disorders in a clinical sample. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 41: 549-561.    

26. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. (1987) Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 40: 171-178.    

27. Guyatt GH, Kirshner B, Jaeschke R. (1992) Measuring health status: what are the necessary measurement properties? J Clin Epidemiol 45: 1341-1345.    

28. Kirshner B, Guyatt G. (1985) A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis 38: 27-36.    

29. Pierannunzi C, Hu SS, Balluz L. (2013) A systematic review of publications assessing reliability and validity of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2004-2011. BMC Med Res Methodol 13: 49.    

Copyright Info: © 2016, Niclas Olofsson, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved