Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Patterns of Sedentary Behaviour in Female Office Workers

1 Physical Activity and Health group, School of Psychological Science and Health, Graham Hills Building, 40 George Street, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
2 Exercise, Nutrition and Environment Research Group, School of Science and Sport, University of the West of Scotland, Hamilton, UK
3 Department of Exercise Science, California Lutheran University, 60 W. Olsen Road, #3400, Thousand Oaks, CA 93065, USA

Special Issues: Advances in sedentary behavior research and translation

Background: Prolonged sedentary behaviour is associated with poor health outcomes. Office workers often engage in excessive sedentary behaviour, however limited research reports on how this sedentary behaviour is accumulated. This study examines objectively measured patterns of prolonged sedentary behaviour in female office workers during weekdays and weekend days and across time of day. Methods: Full time female office workers from a Scottish University participated (N = 27 mean age 43.0 ± 11.5 yrs; BMI 25.8 ± 4.1 kg/m2). Participants wore an activPAL™ for 7 days and completed a diary of waking and working hours. Average week and weekend time sitting, standing and stepping was calculated and also expressed as a proportion of waking day. Average week and weekend daily step count and sit to stand transitions were calculated. Continuous bouts of sedentary behaviour were categorised as: 20–40, 40–60 and > 60 minutes and compared between week and weekend days and across time of day. Results: Average weekday sitting time and proportion was higher (P < 0.05) than weekend days [9.1 hrs (66%) vs 8.1 hrs (56%)]. Time and proportion spent standing was higher (P < 0.01) at weekends than weekdays [4.6 hrs (32%) vs 3.8 hrs (27%)]. Time spent stepping [weekday 1.8 hrs (12%) vs weekend 1.7 hrs (12%)] and total daily step count (weekday 8903 vs weekend day 8014) were not significanlty different (P > 0.05) on weekdays vs weekend days. The pattern of sedentary behaviour bouts was different between week and weekend days. Week days were dominated by a consistent pattern of shorter (20–40 mins) sedentary behaviour bouts. The longest continuous sedentary behaviour bouts occurred in the evening, particularly at weekends. Conclusions: In office workers the most prolonged sedentary behaviour occurred in the evening, particularly at weekends. Interventions need to target these highly saturated periods of sedentary behaviour.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

Keywords sedentary behaviour; office workers; patterns; female; objective measurement

Citation: Alison Kirk, Ann-Marie Gibson, Katie Laverty, David Muggeridge, Louise Kelly, Adrienne Hughes. Patterns of Sedentary Behaviour in Female Office Workers. AIMS Public Health , 2016, 3(3): 423-431. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.3.423

References

  • 1. Sedentary Behaviour Research Network. October 2nd, 2015. Available from: http://www.sedentarybehaviour.org.
  • 2. Wilmot EG, Edwardson CL, Achana FA, et al. (2012) Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 55: 2895-905.    
  • 3. Matthews CE, Chen KY, Freedson PS, et al. (2008) Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003–2004. Am J Epidemiol 167: 875-81.
  • 4. Kazi A, Duncan M, Clemes S, et al. (2014) A survey of sitting time among UK employees. Occup Med 64(7): 497-502.
  • 5. Parry S, Straker L. (2013) The contribution of office work to sedentary behaviour associated risk. BMC Public Health 13: 296.    
  • 6. Thorp AA, Healy GN, Winkler E, et al. (2012) Prolonged sedentary time and physical activity in workplace and non-work contexts: a cross-sectional study of office, customer service and call centre employees. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 9: 128.
  • 7. Munir F, Houdmont J, Clemes S, et al. (2015) Work engagement and its association with occupational sitting time: results from the Stormont study. BMC Public Health 15: 30.    
  • 8. Department of Health. Start Active, Stay Active: a report on physical activity for health from the four home countries’ Chief Medical Officers. 2011. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/start-active-stay-active-a-report-on-physical-activity-from-the-four-home-countries-chief-medical-officers.
  • 9. Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, et al. (2008) Breaks in sedentary time beneficial associations with metabolic risk. Diabetes care 31: 661-6.    
  • 10. Dunstan DW, Kingwell BA, Larsen R, et al. (2012) Breaking up prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glucose and insulin responses. Diabetes care 35: 976-83.    
  • 11. Atkin AJ, Gorely T, Clemes SA, et al. (2012) Methods of Measurement in epidemiology: sedentary Behaviour. Int J Epidemiol 41: 1460-71.
  • 12. Grant PM, Ryan CG, Tigbe WW, et al. (2006) The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities. Br J Sports Med 40: 992-7.    
  • 13. Smith L, Hamer M, Ucci M, et al. (2015) Weekday and weekend patterns of objectively measured sitting, standing, and stepping in a sample of office-based workers: the active buildings study. BMC Public Health 15: 9.    
  • 14. Chastin SFM, Granat MH. (2010) Methods of objectve measure, quantification and analysis of sedentary behaviour and inactivity. Gait Posture 31: 82-6.    
  • 15. Clemes SA, O'Connell SE, Edwardson CL. (2014) Office workers’ objectively measured sedentary behavior and physical activity during and outside working hours. J Occup Environ Med 56: 298-303.    
  • 16. Clemes SA, Patel R, Mahon C, et al. (2014) Sitting time and step counts in office workers. Occup Med 64: 188-92.
  • 17. Chastin SFM, Egerton T, Leask C, et al. (2015) Meta-analysis of the relationship between breaks in sedentary behaviour and cardiometabolic health. Obesity 23: 1800-10.
  • 18. Gardiner PA, Eakin EG, Healy GN, et al. (2011) Feasibility of reducing older adults sedentary time. Am J Prev Med 41: 174-7.
  • 19. Shrestha N, Ijaz S, Kukkonen-Harjula KT, et al. (2015) Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 1. Art. No. CD010912.

 

This article has been cited by

  • 1. Anna Pulakka, Sari Stenholm, Hans Bosma, Nicolaas C. Schaper, Hans H.C.M. Savelberg, Coen D.A. Stehouwer, Carla J.H. van der Kallen, Pieter C. Dagnelie, Simone J.S. Sep, Annemarie Koster, Association Between Employment Status and Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior—The Maastricht Study, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2018, 60, 4, 309, 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001254
  • 2. Evelyn Parr, Brooke Devlin, Marcus Callahan, Bridget Radford, Jennifer Blankenship, David Dunstan, John Hawley, Effects of Providing High-Fat versus High-Carbohydrate Meals on Daily and Postprandial Physical Activity and Glucose Patterns: a Randomised Controlled Trial, Nutrients, 2018, 10, 5, 557, 10.3390/nu10050557

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

Copyright Info: 2016, Alison Kirk, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved