Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Building Interdisciplinary Research Capacity: a Key Challenge for Ecological Approaches in Public Health

1 Department of Health Sciences, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Rd, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
2 School of Health Sciences, University of Northern British Columbia, 3333 University Way Prince George, BC V2N 4Z9, Canada
3 Department of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6
4 Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6

Special Issues: Ecological Approaches in Public Health

The shortcomings of public health research informed by reductionist and fragmented biomedical approaches and the emergence of wicked problems are fueling a renewed interest in ecological approaches in public health. Despite the central role of interdisciplinarity in the context of ecological approaches in public health research, inadequate attention has been given to the specific challenge of doing interdisciplinary research in practice. As a result, important knowledge gaps exist with regards to the practice of interdisciplinary research. We argue that explicit attention towards the challenge of doing interdisciplinary research is critical in order to effectively apply ecological approaches to public health issues. This paper draws on our experiences developing and conducting an interdisciplinary research project exploring the links among climate change, water, and health to highlight five specific insights which we see as relevant to building capacity for interdisciplinary research specifically, and which have particular relevance to addressing the integrative challenges demanded by ecological approaches to address public health issues. These lessons include: (i) the need for frameworks that facilitate integration; (ii) emphasize learning-by-doing; (iii) the benefits of examining issues at multiple scales; (iv) make the implicit, explicit; and (v) the need for reflective practice. By synthesizing and sharing experiences gained by engaging in interdisciplinary inquiries using an ecological approach, this paper responds to a growing need to build interdisciplinary research capacity as a means for advancing the ecological public health agenda more broadly.
  Article Metrics

Keywords interdisciplinary research; interdisciplinarity; ecological; public health

Citation: Lindsay P. Galway, Margot W. Parkes, Diana Allen, Tim K. Takaro. Building Interdisciplinary Research Capacity: a Key Challenge for Ecological Approaches in Public Health. AIMS Public Health , 2016, 3(2): 389-406. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.2.389


  • 1. C. W. Churchman, Guest editorial: Wicked problems. JSTOR, 1967.
  • 2. L. K. Hallstrom, N. P. Guehlstorf, and M. W. Parkes, Ecosystems, society, and health: pathways through diversity, convergence, and integration. 2015.
  • 3. The Lancet, “A Commission on climate change,” The Lancet, vol. 373, no. 9676, p. 1659, May 2009.
  • 4. V. A. Brown, J. A. Harris, and J. Y. Russell, Tackling wicked problems through the transdisciplinary imagination. London: Earthscan, 2010.
  • 5. N. Edwards and C. Davison, “Strengthening Communities with a Socio Ecological Approach,” in Ecosystems, society, and health: pathways through diversity, convergence, and integration, L. K. Hallstrom, N. P. Guehlstorf, and M. W. Parkes, Eds. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, 2015.
  • 6. D. F. Charron, “Ecohealth: Origins and Approach,” Ecohealth Res. Pract., pp. 1–30, 2012.
  • 7. D. F. Charron, “Ecosystem Approaches to Health for a Global Sustainability Agenda,” EcoHealth, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 256–266, Sep. 2012.
  • 8. D. Waltner-Toews, J. J. Kay, and N.-M. E. Lister, The Ecosystem Approach: Complexity, Uncertainty, and Managing for Sustainability. Columbia University Press, 2013.
  • 9. J. Zinsstag, E. Schelling, D. Waltner-Toews, and M. Tanner, “From ‘one medicine’ to ‘one health’ and systemic approaches to health and well-being,” Prev. Vet. Med., vol. 101, no. 3–4, pp. 148–156, Sep. 2011.
  • 10. S. Whitmee, A. Haines, C. Beyrer, F. Boltz, A. G. Capon, B. F. de Souza Dias, A. Ezeh, H. Frumkin, P. Gong, P. Head, R. Horton, G. M. Mace, R. Marten, S. S. Myers, S. Nishtar, S. A. Osofsky, S. K. Pattanayak, M. J. Pongsiri, C. Romanelli, A. Soucat, J. Vega, and D. Yach, “Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on planetary health,” The Lancet, vol. 386, no. 10007, pp. 1973–2028, Nov. 2015.
  • 11. M. Parkes, “Diversity, emergence, resilience: guides for a new generation of ecohealth research and practice,” EcoHealth, 2012.
  • 12. T. Lang and G. Rayner, “Ecological public health: the 21st century’s big idea? An essay by Tim Lang and Geof Rayner,” BMJ, vol. 345, no. aug21 1, pp. e5466–e5466, Aug. 2012.
  • 13. M. W. Parkes and A. Sánchez, “Better together: field-building networks at the frontiers of ecohealth research,” in Ecohealth research in practice, Ottawa: International Development Research Centre ; Springer, 2012, pp. 231–253.
  • 14. V. A. Brown and J. A. Harris, The human capacity for transformational change: harnessing the collective mind, 1st ed. London ; New York: Routledge, 2014.
  • 15. R. Bhaskar, C. Frank, P. Naess, and J. Parker, Interdisciplinarity and climate change: transforming knowledge and practice for our global future. New York: Routledge, 2010.
  • 16. C. Pohl, “From science to policy through transdisciplinary research,” Environ. Sci. Policy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 46–53, Feb. 2008.
  • 17. A. Cantor, V. DeLauer, D. Martin, and J. Rogan, “Training interdisciplinary ‘wicked problem’ solvers: applying lessons from HERO in community-based research experiences for undergraduates,” J. Geogr. High. Educ., pp. 1–13, Jun. 2015.
  • 18. C. Lyall, A. Bruce, J. Tait, and L. Meagher, Interdisciplinary research journeys: Practical strategies for capturing creativity. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.
  • 19. P. Holm, M. E. Goodsite, S. Cloetingh, M. Agnoletti, B. Moldan, D. J. Lang, R. Leemans, J. O. Moeller, M. P. Buendía, W. Pohl, R. W. Scholz, A. Sors, B. Vanheusden, K. Yusoff, and R. Zondervan, “Collaboration between the natural, social and human sciences in Global Change Research,” Environ. Sci. Policy, vol. 28, pp. 25–35, Apr. 2013.
  • 20. C. Lyall, A. Bruce, J. Tait, and L. Meagher, Interdisciplinary research journeys: Practical strategies for capturing creativity. FT Press, 2011.
  • 21. Climate Change Impacts Research Consortium, “Climate Change Impacts Research Consortium.” [Online]. Available: http://www.sfu.ca/ccirc/. [Accessed: 03-May-2016].
  • 22. P. Mahboubi, M. W. Parkes, and H. M. Chan, “Challenges and Opportunities of Integrating Human Health into the Environmental Assessment Process: The Canadian Experience Contextualised to International Efforts,” J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manag., p. 1550034, 2015.
  • 23. J. Kingsley, R. Patrick, P. Horwitz, M. Parkes, A. Jenkins, C. Massy, C. Henderson-Wilson, and K. Arabena, “Exploring Ecosystems and Health by Shifting to a Regional Focus: Perspectives from the Oceania EcoHealth Chapter,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 12706–12722, 2015.
  • 24. E. Norman and K. J. Bakker, Water security: a primer. Program on Water Governance, University of British Columbia, 2010.
  • 25. E. S. Norman, G. Dunn, K. Bakker, D. M. Allen, and R. C. De Albuquerque, “Water security assessment: integrating governance and freshwater indicators,” Water Resour. Manag., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 535–551, 2013.
  • 26. M. J. Bunch, M. Parkes, K. Zubrycki, H. Venema, L. Hallstrom, C. Neudorffer, M. Berbés-Blázquez, and K. Morrison, “Watershed management and public health: An exploration of the intersection of two fields as reported in the literature from 2000 to 2010,” Environ. Manage., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 240–254, 2014.
  • 27. L. P. Galway, D. M. Allen, M. W. Parkes, and T. K. Takaro, “Seasonal variation of acute gastro-intestinal illness by hydroclimatic regime and drinking water source: a retrospective population-based study,” J. Water Health, vol. 12, no. 1, 2014.
  • 28. L. P. Galway, D. M. Allen, M. W. Parkes, L. Li, and T. K. Takaro, “Hydroclimatic variables and acute gastro-intestinal illness in British Columbia, Canada: A time series analysis,” Water Resour. Res., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 885–895, Feb. 2015.
  • 29. L. P. Galway, M. W. Parkes, K. K. Corbett, D. M. Allen, and T. K. Takaro, “Climate change frames in public health and water resource management: Towards intersectoral climate change adaptation,” in Information, Communication, Education and Training on Climate Change, Springer, in press.
  • 30. C. Lyall and L. Meagher, “A Short Guide to Troubleshooting some Common Interdisciplinary Research Management Challenges,” ISST Brief. Note, no. 5, 2008.
  • 31. B. C. Choi and A. W. Pak, “Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness.,” Clin. Investig. Med. Med. Clin. Exp., vol. 29, no. 6, p. 351, 2006.
  • 32. A. F. Repko, Interdisciplinary research: process and theory, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 33. “A taxonomy of interdisciplinary knowledge,” in The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 15–30.
  • 34. E. Merwin, “Building Interdisciplinary Mental Health Services Research Teams: A Case Example,” Issues Ment. Health Nurs., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 547–554, Jan. 1995.
  • 35. M. W. Parkes and P. Horwitz, “Ecology and Ecosystems as Foundational for Health,” in Environmental Health: From Global to Local, 3rd vols., Jossey-Bass, 2016.
  • 36. M. Parkes, “‘Just add water’: Dissolving barriers to collaboration and learning for health, ecosystems and equity,” in Ecosystems, Society and Health: Pathways through Diversity, Convergence and Integration, L. Hallstrom, N. Guelstorf, and M. Parkes, Eds. Toronto: McGill-Queens University Press, 2015, pp. 184–222.
  • 37. G. McDonell, “Disciplines as cultures: Towards reflection and understanding,” in Transdisciplinarity: Recrea ting Integrated Knowledge , M. Sommerville and Rapport, D, Eds. Oxford: EOLSS Publishing, 2000, pp. 25–37.
  • 38. M. C. Lemos and B. J. Morehouse, “The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments,” Glob. Environ. Change, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 57–68, Apr. 2005.
  • 39. R. Bullock, “A critical frame analysis of Northern Ontario’s ‘forestry crisis,’” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada, 2010.
  • 40. M. A. Max-Neef, “Foundations of transdisciplinarity,” Ecol. Econ., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 5–16, 2005.
  • 41. M. W. Parkes, L. Bienen, J. Breilh, L. N. Hsu, M. McDonald, J. A. Patz, J. P. Rosenthal, M. Sahani, A. Sleigh, D. Waltner-Toews, and others, “All hands on deck: transdisciplinary approaches to emerging infectious disease,” EcoHealth, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 258–272, 2005.
  • 42. K. Huutoniemi, J. T. Klein, H. Bruun, and J. Hukkinen, “Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators,” Res. Policy, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 79–88, Feb. 2010.
  • 43. H. Bridle, A. Vrieling, M. Cardillo, Y. Araya, and L. Hinojosa, “Preparing for an interdisciplinary future: A perspective from early-career researchers,” Futures, vol. 53, pp. 22–32, Sep. 2013.
  • 44. B. S. McIntosh, R. A. F. Seaton, and P. Jeffrey, “Tools to think with? Towards understanding the use of computer-based support tools in policy relevant research,” Environ. Model. Softw., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 640–648, 2007.
  • 45. A. Binot, R. Duboz, P. Promburom, W. Phimpraphai, J. Cappelle, C. Lajaunie, F. L. Goutard, T. Pinyopummintr, M. Figuié, and F. L. Roger, “A framework to promote collective action within the One Health community of practice: Using participatory modelling to enable interdisciplinary, cross-sectoral and multi-level integration,” One Health, vol. 1, pp. 44–48, 2015.
  • 46. [46] M. Berbes-Blazquez, M. Feagan, D. Waltner-Toews, and M. W. Parkes, “The Need for Heuristics in Ecosystem Approaches to Health,” EcoHealth, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 290–291, Sep. 2014.
  • 47. J. Habermas, Knowledge and human interests. Beacon Press, USA, 1972.
  • 48. P. Cranton, “Interpretive and critical evaluation,” New Dir. Teach. Learn., vol. 2001, no. 88, pp. 11–18, 2001.
  • 49. P. Cranton, “Rethinking evaluation of student learning,” High. Educ. Perspect., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 8, 2006.
  • 50. D. M. Allen, P. H. Whitfield, and A. Werner, “Groundwater level responses in temperate mountainous terrain: regime classification, and linkages to climate and streamflow,” Hydrol. Process., vol. 24, no. 23, pp. 3392–3412, 2010.
  • 51. M. J. Bunch, K. E. Morrison, M. W. Parkes, and H. D. Venema, “Promoting health and well-being by managing for social–ecological resilience: the potential of integrating ecohealth and water resources management approaches,” Ecol. Soc., vol. 16, no. 1, 2011.
  • 52. R. M. Entman, “Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm,” J. Commun., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 51–58, 1993.
  • 53. R. M. Entman, Projections of power: framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.
  • 54. Ecohealth, “EcoHealth2014 Call to Action on Climate Change,” EcoHealth, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 456–458, Dec. 2014.
  • 55. G. Gibbs, Great Britain, and Further Education Unit, Learning by doing: a guide to teaching and learning methods. [London]: FEU, 1988.
  • 56. D. Waltner-Toews, The origin of feces: what excrement tells us about evolution, ecology, and a sustainable society. Toronto, ON: ECW Press, 2013.
  • 57. M. Parkes and R. Panelli, “Integrating catchment ecosystems and community health: the value of participatory action research,” Ecosyst. Health, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 85–106, 2001.
  • 58. L. J. Bracken and E. A. Oughton, “‘What do you mean?’ The importance of language in developing interdisciplinary research,” Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 371–382, Sep. 2006.
  • 59. A. Dewulf, “Contrasting frames in policy debates on climate change adaptation,” WIREs Clim. Change, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 321–330, 2013.
  • 60. M. O’Rourke, S. Crowley, S. D. Eigenbrode, and J. D. Wulfhorst, Enhancing communication & collaboration in interdisciplinary research. SAGE Publications, 2013.
  • 61. D. Stokols, K. L. Hall, R. P. Moser, A. X. Feng, S. Misra, and B. K. Taylor, Cross-disciplinary team science initiatives: research, training, and translation. na, 2010.
  • 62. H. Fünfgeld and D. McEvoy, “Frame divergence in climate change adaptation policy: insights from Australian local government planning,” Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 603–622, 2014.
  • 63. M. W. Kreuter, C. De Rosa, E. H. Howze, and G. T. Baldwin, “Understanding wicked problems: a key to advancing environmental health promotion,” Health Educ. Behav. Off. Publ. Soc. Public Health Educ., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 441–454, Aug. 2004.
  • 64. J. Dupuis and P. Knoepfel, “The adaptation policy paradox: the implementation deficit of policies framed as climate change adaptation,” Ecol. Soc., vol. 18, no. 4, 2013.
  • 65. E. Oughton and L. Bracken, “Interdisciplinary research: framing and reframing,” Area, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 385–394, 2009.
  • 66. C. Pahl-Wostl, “The importance of social learning in restoring the multifunctionality of rivers and floodplains,” Ecol. Soc., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 10, 2006.
  • 67. K. E. Porter and M. Hulme, “The emergence of the geoengineering debate in the UK print media: a frame analysis,” Geogr. J., vol. 179, no. 4, pp. 342–355, Dec. 2013.
  • 68. K. O’Brien, A. St Clair, and B. Kristoffersen, “The framing of climate change: why it matters,” in Climate change, ethics and human security, K. O’Brien, A. St. Clair, and Kristoffersen, Eds. London: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 3–22.
  • 69. L. O’Brien, M. Marzano, and R. M. White, “‘Participatory interdisciplinarity’: Towards the integration of disciplinary diversity with stakeholder engagement for new models of knowledge production,” Sci. Public Policy, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 51–61, Feb. 2013.
  • 70. N. R. A. Romm, “Interdisciplinary practice as reflexivity,” Syst. Pract. Action Res., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 63–77, 1998.
  • 71. S. Cornell, “Brokering interdisciplinarity across the physical and social sciences,” in Interdisciplinarity and climate change: transforming knowledge and practice for our global future, R. Bhaskar, Ed. New York: Routledge, 2010.
  • 72. A. Blanchard and J.-P. Vanderlinden, “Dissipating the fuzziness around interdisciplinarity: the case of climate change research,” S.A.P.I.EN.S, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–6, Jul. 2010.
  • 73. J. Dewey, Experience and Education:The 60th anniversary edition. West Lafayetter, IN: Kappa Delta Pi, 1998.
  • 74. C. R. Rodgers, “Attending to student voice: The impact of descriptive feedback on learning and t teaching,” Curric. Inq., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 209–237, Jun. 2006.
  • 75. R. Phelps, “The potential of reflective journals in studying complexity’in action’,” Complicity Int. J. Complex. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, 2005.
  • 76. J. S. Bruner, The process of Education. Harvard University Press, 1960.
  • 77. R. E. Gearing and I. A. Mian, “An approach to maximizing treatment adherence of children and adolescents with psychotic disorders and major mood disorders,” Can. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry Rev., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 106–113, Nov. 2005.
  • 78. C. A. Orchard, V. Curran, and S. Kabene, “Creating a culture for interdisciplinary collaborative professional practice,” Med. Educ. Online, vol. 10, 2009.
  • 79. D. A. Schön, The reflective practitioner, vol. 1. Basic books, 1999.
  • 80. D. A. Kolb, Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. London: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
  • 81. G. Rolfe, D. Freshwater, and M. Jasper, Critical reflection for nursing and the helping professions: a user’s guide. Palgrave, 2001.
  • 82. M. Pacanowsky, “Team tools for wicked problems,” Organ. Dyn., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 36–51, 1996.
  • 83. Rockefeller Foundation, “Planetary health: Improving human health by healing the planet,” Summary of meeting, 2014.
  • 84. “Global Change and Public Health: Addressing the ecological determinants of health,” Canadian Public Health Association, Ottawa, 2015.
  • 85. D. P. MacMynowski, “Pausing at the brink of interdisciplinarity: Power and knowledge at the meeting of social and biophysical science.,” Ecol. Soc., vol. 12, no. 1, 2007.
  • 86. C. Geertz, Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1983.


This article has been cited by

  • 1. Chris G. Buse, Maxwell Smith, Diego S. Silva, Attending to scalar ethical issues in emerging approaches to environmental health research and practice, Monash Bioethics Review, 2018, 10.1007/s40592-018-0080-3
  • 2. Maya K. Gislason, Vanessa Sloan Morgan, Kendra Mitchell-Foster, Margot W. Parkes, Voices from the landscape: Storytelling as emergent counter-narratives and collective action from northern BC watersheds, Health & Place, 2018, 54, 191, 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.08.024
  • 3. Pierre Horwitz, Margot Parkes, Intertwined Strands for Ecology in Planetary Health, Challenges, 2019, 10, 1, 20, 10.3390/challe10010020
  • 4. Karen Setty, Jean-Francois Loret, Sophie Courtois, Charlotte Christiane Hammer, Philippe Hartemann, Michel Lafforgue, Xavier Litrico, Tarek Manasfi, Gertjan Medema, Mohamed Shaheen, Vincent Tesson, Jamie Bartram, Faster and safer: Research priorities in water and health, International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 2019, 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.03.003
  • 5. BinBin J. Pearce, Olivier Ejderyan, Joint problem framing as reflexive practice: honing a transdisciplinary skill, Sustainability Science, 2019, 10.1007/s11625-019-00744-2
  • 6. Evan J Andrews, Sarah Harper, Tim Cashion, Juliano Palacios-Abrantes, Jessica Blythe, Jack Daly, Sondra Eger, Carie Hoover, Nicolás Talloni-Alvarez, Louise Teh, Nathan Bennett, Graham Epstein, Christine Knott, Sarah L Newell, Charlotte K Whitney, Howard Browman, Supporting early career researchers: insights from interdisciplinary marine scientists, ICES Journal of Marine Science, 2020, 10.1093/icesjms/fsz247
  • 7. Abou Ali Vedadhir, Carla Rodrigues, Helen Lambert, Social science research contributions to antimicrobial resistance: protocol for a scoping review, Systematic Reviews, 2020, 9, 1, 10.1186/s13643-020-1279-y
  • 8. Gordon Dugle, Joseph Kwame Wulifan, John Paul Tanyeh, Wilm Quentin, A critical realist synthesis of cross-disciplinary health policy and systems research: defining characteristic features, developing an evaluation framework and identifying challenges, Health Research Policy and Systems, 2020, 18, 1, 10.1186/s12961-020-00556-2

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

Copyright Info: 2016, Lindsay P. Galway, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved