Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Youth Advocates’ Perceptions of Tobacco Industry Marketing Influences on Adolescent Smoking: Can They See the Signs?

1 Oklahoma State Department of Health, Office of the State Epidemiologist, 1000 NE 10th St, Oklahoma City, OK 73117, USA
2 Oklahoma State Department of Health, Office of the Tribal Liaison, 1000 NE 10th St, Oklahoma City, OK 73117, USA
3 University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Department of Pediatrics, 1100 N. Lindsay, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA

Special Issues: Addressing Chronic Disease Prevention and Tobacco Control in the Retail Environment

Point-of-sale (POS) advertising at retail stores is one of the key marketing avenues used by the tobacco industry. The United States Surgeon General urges actions to eliminate POS tobacco advertisements because of their influence on youth smoking. Many youth empowerment programs are implemented to address tobacco industry marketing influences, including POS tobacco advertisements. While youth are asked to take on such collective action, little is known regarding their perceptions and understanding of tobacco industry marketing influences and related advocacy activities. This mixed methods study examined Oklahoma’s tobacco control youth empowerment program members’ perceptions of tobacco industry marketing influences. Four focus groups were held with active program members from rural and urban areas. Overall, the focus group participants viewed the program as purposeful, as an avenue to help others, and as a way to make a difference. Specifically, the older participants (median age = 18 years) identified tobacco industry marketing influences such as POS, movies, and magazine advertisements and reported participating in activities that counter POS tobacco advertisements at retail stores. Likewise younger participants (median age = 16 years), identified similar tobacco industry marketing influences, but also included tobacco use by friends and family as tobacco industry marketing influences. Moreover, the younger participants did not report engaging in activities that addressed POS tobacco advertisements. The study results suggest that the empowerment program should tailor its programming, training, materials, and activities with input from youth of various ages. Thoughtfully developed messages and specific activities can truly empower youth and maximize their contribution as change agents who address POS or other initiatives at the retail environments to prevent chronic diseases.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

References

1. Federal Trade Commission (US): Cigarette report for 2012. Federal Trade Commission (US), 2015. Available from: https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/reports/federal-trade -commission -cigarette-report-2012/150327-2012cigaretterpt.pdf

2. Washington University at St. Louis, Brown School of Social Work, Center for Public Health Systems Science. Point-of-sale report to the nation: the tobacco retail and policy landscape. St. Louis: Washington University in St. Louis and Tobacco Control Legal Consortium; 2014. 48 p.

3. Feighery E, Ribisl K, Schleicher N, et al. (2001) Cigarette advertising and promotional strategies in retail outlets: results of a statewide survey in California. Tob Control 10: 184-188.    

4. Henriksen L, Feighery E, Schleicher N, et al. (2004) Reaching youth at the point of sale: cigarette marketing is more prevalent in stores where adolescents shop frequently. Tob Control 13: 315-318.    

5. Laws M, Whitman J, Bowser D, et al. (2002) Tobacco availability and point of sale marketing in demographically contrasting districts of Massachusetts. Tob Control 11: ii71-ii73.

6. Spanopoulos D, Britton J, McNeill A, et al. (2014) Tobacco display and brand communication at the point of sale: implications for adolescent smoking behavior. Tob Control 23: 64-69.    

7. Slater S, Chaloupke F, Wakefield M, et al. (2007) The impact of retail cigarette marketing on youth smoking uptake. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 161: 440-445.    

8. Donovan R, Jancey J, Jones S. (2002) Tobacco point of sale advertising increases positive brand user imagery. Tob Control 11: 191-194.    

9. Henriksen L, Feighery E, Wang Y, et al. (2004) Association of retail tobacco marketing with adolescent smoking. Am J Public Health 94: 2081-2083.    

10. Scheffels J, Lavik R. (2013) Out of sight, out of mind? Removal of point-of-sale tobacco displays in Norway. Tob Control 22: e37-e42.

11. Department of Health and Human Services (US). Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: a report of the Surgeon General [Internet]. [Atlanta]: Department of Health and Human Services (US); 2012 [cited 2015 Jul 9]. 1,395 p. Available from http://surgeongeneral.gov /library/report/preventing-youth-tobacco-use

12. Goldstein A, Peterson A, Ribisl K, et al. (2003) Passage of 100% tobacco-free school policies in North Carolina school districts. J Sch Health 73: 293-299.    

13. Douglas M, Manion C, Hall-Harper V, et al. (2015) Case Studies from community coalitions: advancing local tobacco control policy in a preemptive state. Am J Prev Med 48: S29-S35.    

14. Holden D, Crankshaw E, Nimsch C, et al. (2004) Quantifying the impact of participation in local tobacco control groups on the psychological empowerment of involved youth. Health Educ Behav 31: 615-628.    

15. Hersey J, Niederdeppe J, Ng S, et al. (2004) How state counter-industry campaigns help prime perceptions of tobacco industry practices to promote reductions in youth smoking. Tob Control 14: 377-383.

16. Hinnant L, Nimsch C, Stone-Wiggins D. (2004) Examination of the relationship between community support and tobacco control activities as a part of youth empowerment programs. Health Educ Behav 31: 629-640.    

17. Douglas M, Carter S, Wilson A, Chan A. (2015) A neo-strategic planning approach to enhance local tobacco control programs. Am J Prev Med 48: S13-S20.    

18. Krueger R, Casey M. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000. 219 p.

19. Holden D, Messeri P, Evans D, et al. (2004) Conceptualizing youth empowerment within tobacco control. Health Educ Behav 31: 548-563.    

20. Carey J, Wenzel P, Reilly C, et al. CDC EZ-TEXT: Software for collection, management, and analysis of semi-structured qualitative databases [download] Version 3.06 Atlanta: Conwal, Inc.; 1998.

21. Hinnant L. Developing a definition of youth empowerment: youths’ experiences of empowerment and the role of collective involvement [dissertation]. [North Carolina]: North Carolina State University; 2001. 234 p.

22. Moses L, Baldwin D. (2005) What can the study of cognitive development reveal about children's ability to appreciate and cope with advertising? J Public Policy Marketing 24: 186-201.    

23. Breinbauer C, Maddaleno M. Youth: choices and change. promoting healthy behaviors in adolescents. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization; 2005. 390 p.

24. Larson R, Hansen D. (2005) The development of strategic thinking: learning to impact human systems in a youth activism program. Hum Development 48: 327-349.    

25. Checkoway B, Gutierrez L. (2006) Youth participation and community change: an introduction. J Community Pract 14: 1-9.

26. Ross H, Dearing J, Rollins A. (2015) Oklahoma’s youth-driven tobacco policy campaigns: Assessment of impacts and lessons learned. Am J Prev Med 48: S36-S43.    

27. Camino L. (2005) Pitfalls and promising practices of youth-adult partnerships: an evaluator’s reflections. J Community Psychol 33: 75-85.    

28. Wilson N, Minkler M, Dasho S, et al. (2008) Getting to social action: the youth empowerment strategies (YES!) project. Health Promot Pract 9: 395-403.    

29. Douglas M. A mission-focused evaluation of Oklahoma students working against tobacco (SWAT) [dissertation]. [Oklahoma]: University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; 2008. 219 p.

30. Institute of Medicine (US). The role and potential of communities in population health improvement: workshop summary [Internet]. [Washington]: The National Academies Press (US), 2015 [cited 2015 Jul 9]. 72p. Available from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/18946/the-role-and-potential- of-communities -in-population-health-improvement

31. Wong N, Zimmerman M, Parker E. (2010) A typology of youth participation and empowerment for child and adolescent health promotion. Am J Community Psychol 46: 100-114.    

Copyright Info: © 2016, Malinda Douglas, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved