Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Crime and Violence among MDMA Users in the United States

1 School of Social Work, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO 63103, United States;
2 School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, United States;
3 Criminology and Criminal Justice Studies, Department of Sociology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50013, United States;
4 School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States

The question of whether MDMA use is associated with increased crime and violence has not been adequately explored especially in nationally representative samples. This study used data from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) to assess the association between MDMA use and violent and non-violent antisocial behavior while controlling for sociodemographic variables, lifetime psychiatric, alcohol and drug use disorders, and family history of antisocial behavior. MDMA users, both male and female, were involved in a number of crimes in acts of violence including drunk driving, shoplifting, theft, intimate partner violence, and fighting. Notably, female MDMA users were more antisocial than male non-MDMA users. Although adjusting the results for numerous confounds attenuated the relationships, MDMA users were still at significantly greater odds of engaging in violent and nonviolent crime than non-MDMA users. Although MDMA has been considered a facilitator of empathy and closeness, the current study suggests a dark side as MDMA is associated with a broad array of crimes and transgressions. Additional tests of the MDMA-crime link are needed to properly inform policy.
  Article Metrics

Keywords ecstasy; MDMA; crime; violence; drug use; gender

Citation: Michael G. Vaughn, Christopher P. Salas-Wright, Matt DeLisi, Brian E. Perron, David Cordova. Crime and Violence among MDMA Users in the United States. AIMS Public Health , 2015, 2(1): 64-73. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.1.64


  • 1. Morgan MJ (1998) Recreational use of “ecstasy” (MDMA) is associated with elevated impulsivity. Neuropsychopharmacol 19: 252-264.    
  • 2. Parrott AC (2013) Human psychobiology of MDMA or ‘Ecstasy': an overview of 25 years of empirical research. Hum Psychopharmacol 28: 289-307.    
  • 3. Harvard Mental Health Letter (2001) MDMA. Harv Ment Health Lett: 5-6.
  • 4. Hegadoren K, Baker G, Bourin M (1999) 3, 4-Methylenedioxy analogues of amphetamine: defining the risks to humans. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 23: 539-553.    
  • 5. Nichols DE (1986) Differences between the mechanism of action of MDMA, MBDB, and the classic hallucinogens. Identification of a new therapeutic class: entactogens. J Psychoactive Drugs 18:305-313.
  • 6. Nichols DE, Oberiender R (1990) Structure-activity relationships of MDMA and related compounds: A new class of psychoactive agents? In: Peroutka SJ, editor. Ecstasy: The clinical, pharmacological and neurotoxicological effects of the drug MDMA. Boston, MA: Kluwer, Academic. pp. 53-620.
  • 7. Curran HV, Rees H, Hoare T, et al. (2004) Empathy and aggression: two faces of ecstasy? A study of interpretative cognitive bias and mood change in ecstasy users. Psychopharmacol 173: 425-433.
  • 8. Jackson B, Reed A (1970) Another abusable amphetamine. JAMA 211: 830-830.    
  • 9. Peroutka SJ (1987) Incidence of recreational use of 3, 4-methylenedimethoxymethamphetamine (MDMA," ecstasy") on an undergraduate campus. New Engl J Med 317: 1542-1543.
  • 10. Mithoefer MC, Wagner MT, Mithoefer AT, et al. (2011) The safety and efficacy of ±3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-assisted psychotherapy in subjects with chronic, treatment-resistant posttraumatic stress disorder: the first randomized controlled pilot study. J Psychopharmacol 25: 439-452.    
  • 11. Reid LW, Elifson KW, Sterk CE (2007) Hug drug or thug drug? Ecstasy use and aggressive behavior. Violence Vict 22: 104-119.
  • 12. Hammersley R, Ditton J, Smith I, et al. (1999) Patterns of ecstasy use by drug users. Br J Criminol39: 625-647.
  • 13. Yacoubian GS, Arria AM, Fost E, et al. (2002) Estimating the prevalence of ecstasy use among juvenile offenders. J Psychoactive Drugs 34: 209-213.    
  • 14. Lieb R, Schuetz CG, Pfister H, et al. (2002) Mental disorders in ecstasy users: a prospective-longitudinal investigation. Drug Alcohol Depend 68: 195-207.    
  • 15. Grant BF, Dawson DA, Stinson FS, et al. (2003) The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-IV (AUDADIS-IV): reliability of alcohol consumption, tobacco use, family history of depression and psychiatric diagnostic modules in a general population sample. Drug Alcohol Depend 71: 7-16.    
  • 16. StataCorp (2013) Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
  • 17. Grant BF, Dawson DA (2006) Introduction to the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Alcohol Health Res World 29: 74.
  • 18. Molliver ME, Berger UV, Mamounas LA, et al. (1990) Neurotoxicity of MDMA and Related Compounds: Anatomic Studiesa. Ann N Y Acad Sci 600: 640-661.    
  • 19. Ricaurte GA, Yuan J, McCann UD (1999) (+/-) 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (‘Ecstasy')-induced serotonin neurotoxicity: studies in animals. Neuropsychobiology 42: 5-10.
  • 20. McCann UD, Ricaurte GA, Ciraulo DA (1991) Lasting Neuropsychiatric Sequelae of (+/-) Methylenedioxymethamphetamine ('Ecstasy') in Recreational Users. J Clin Psychopharmacol 11:302-305.
  • 21. Pallanti S, Mazzi D (1992) MDMA (Ecstasy) precipitation of panic disorder. Biol Psychiatry 32:91-95.    
  • 22. Parrott A, Sisk E, Turner J (2000) Psychobiological problems in heavy ‘ecstasy'(MDMA) polydrug users. Drug Alcohol Depend 60: 105-110.
  • 23. Retz W, Retz-Junginger P, Supprian T, et al. (2004) Association of serotonin transporter promoter gene polymorphism with violence: relation with personality disorders, impulsivity, and childhood ADHD psychopathology. Behav Sci Law 22: 415-425.    
  • 24. DeLisi M, Vaughn M (2014) Foundation for a temperament-based theory of antisocial behavior and criminal justice system involvement. J Crim Justice 42: 10-25.    


This article has been cited by

  • 1. Ángel Romero-Martínez, Marisol Lila, Luis Moya-Albiol, Long-Term Drug Misuse Increases the Risk of Cognitive Dysfunctions in Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators: Key Intervention Targets for Reducing Dropout and Reoffending, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16, 20, 3792, 10.3390/ijerph16203792
  • 2. Fabrizio Schifano, Caroline Zangani, Stefania Chiappini, Amira Guirguis, Stefania Bonaccorso, John M. Corkery, , Violence and Mental Disorders, 2020, Chapter 6, 95, 10.1007/978-3-030-33188-7_6
  • 3. Jan van Amsterdam, Johannes G. Ramaekers, Ton Nabben, Wim van den Brink, Use characteristics and harm potential of ecstasy in The Netherlands, Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 2020, 1, 10.1080/09687637.2020.1818692

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

Copyright Info: 2015, Michael G. Vaughn, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved