Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Environment-Gene interaction in common complex diseases: New approaches

Division of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA

Special Issues: Gene x Environment Interactions and Systems Biology in Chronic Disease

Approximately 100,000 different environmental chemicals that are in use as high production volume chemicals confront us in our daily lives. Many of the chemicals we encounter are persistent and have long half-lives in the environment and our bodies. These compounds are referred to as Persistent Organic Pollutants, or POPS. The total environment however is broader than just toxic pollutants. It includes social capital, social economic status, and other factors that are not commonly considered in traditional approaches to studying environment-human interactions. The mechanism of action of environmental agents in altering the human phenotype from health to disease is more complex than once thought. The focus in public health has shifted away from the study of single-gene rare diseases and has given way to the study of multifactorial complex diseases that are common in the population. To understand common complex diseases, we need teams of scientists from different fields working together with common aims. We review some approaches for studying the action of the environment by discussing use-inspired research, and transdisciplinary research approaches. The Genomic era has yielded new tools for study of gene-environment interactions, including genomics, epigenomics, and systems biology. We use environmentally-driven diabetes mellitus type two as an example of environmental epigenomics and disease. The aim of this review is to start the conversation of how the application of advances in biomedical science can be used to advance public health.
  Article Metrics


1. Nakamura J, Mutlu E, Sharma V, et al. (2014) The Endogenous Exposome. DNA Repair (Amst) 19: 3-13.    

2. Wild CP (2012) The exposome: From concept to utility. Int J Epidemiol 41: 24-32.    

3. EPA, Persistent Organic Pollutants: A Global Issue, A Global Response. EPA, 2009. Available from: http://www2.epa.gov/international-cooperation/persistent-organic-pollutants-global-issue-global-response#pops (Accessed July 17, 2014).

4. Magliano DJ, Loh VH, Harding JL, et al. (2014) Persistent Organic Pollutants and Diabetes: A Review of the Epidemiological Evidence. Diabetes Meab 40: 1-14.    

5. Myre M, Imbeault P (2014) Persistent Organic Pllutants Meet Adipose Tissue Hypoxia: Does Cross-talk Contribute to Obesity. Obes Res 15: 19-28.    

6. Taylor KW, Novak RF, Anderson HA, et al. (2013) Evaluation of the Association Between Persistent Organic pollutants (POPs) and diabetes in Epidemiological Studies: A National Toxicology Program Workshop Review. Environ Health Perspect 121: 774-783.    

7. Gascon M, Morales E, Sunyer J, et al. (2013) Effects of Persistent Organic Pollutants on the Developing Respiratory and Immune Systems: A Systematic Review. Environ Int 52: 51-65.    

8. Li QQ, Loganath A, Chong YS, et al. (2006) Persistent Organic Pollutants and Adverse Health Effects in Humans. J Toxicol Env Health Part A 69: 1987-2005.    

9. Zielinski I, Tsui I-C (1995) Cystic Fibrosis: Genotypic and Phenotypic Variations. Ann, Rev Genet 29: 777-807.    

10. Braun A, Roth R, McGinnis MJ (2003) Technology challenges in screening single gene disorders. Eur J Pediatr 162: S 13-16.

11. WHO (2014) World Health Statistics 2014. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 180.

12. Russell JY (2010) A Philosophical Framework for an Open and Critical Transdisciplinary Inquuiry. In: Brown VA, Harris JA, Russell JY, editors. Tackling Wicked Problems Through the Transdisciplinary Imagination. NY, NY: Earthscan, 31-60.

13. Stokols D, Hall KL, Vogel AL (2013) Transdisciplinary Public Health: Definitions, Core Characteristics, and Strategies for Success. In: Haire-Joshu D, McBride TD, editors. Transdisciplinary Public Health: Research, Education, and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1-30.

14. Jacobs JA, Frickel S (2009) Interdisciplinarity: A Critical Assessment. Annu Rev Sociol 35: 43-65.    

15. Klein JT (2008) Evaluation of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research - A Literature Review. Amer J Prev Med Suppl 2 35: S-116-S-123.

16. Hays TC (2008) The Science of Team Science - Commentary on Measurements of Scientific Readiness. Amer J Prev Med Suppl 2 35: S-193-S195.

17. DE (1997) Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation: Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.

18. NRC (2014) Convergence: Facilitating Transdisciplinary Integration of Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, Engineering and Beyond. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 137.

19. Roche M, Glick TF (1944) Thomas Edison and Basic Science, Edison: Myths and Reality. Arbor: 39-50.

20. Duggan MB (2014) Prevention of childhood malnutrition: immensity of the challenge and variety of strategies. Paediatr Int Child Health 32: 190-203.

21. Blackburn GL (2001) Pasteur's Quadrant and Malnutrition. Nature 409: 397-401.    

22. Verbeke W (2005) Consumer acceptance of functional foods: Socio-demographic, cognitive and attitudinal determinants. Food Quality and Preference 16: 45-57.    

23. Bhutta ZA, Darmstadt GL (2014) A Role for Science Investments in Advancing Newborn Health. Science Translational Medicine 6: 253-258.

24. Childress DS (1999) Working in Pasteur's Quadrant. J Rehabilitation Res Dev 36: xi-xii.

25. De Luigi AJ, Cooper RA (2014) Adaptive sports technology and biomechanics: prosthetics. PM R 8 Suppl.: S40-S57.

26. Hardbower DM, Peek RM, Jr., Wilson KT (2014) At the Bench: Helicobacter pylori, dysregulated host responses, DNA damage, and gastric cancer. J Leukoc Biol 96: 201-212.    

27. Dalal RS, Moss SF (2014) At the Bedside: Helicobacter pylori, dysregulated host responses, DNA damage, and gastric cancer. J Leukoc Biol 96: 213-224.    

28. Nobel Committee, The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine Prize Announcement. The Nobel Committee for Physiology or Medicine,2005. Available from:http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/2005/announcement.html.

29. Konturek SJ, Konturek PC, Brzozowski T, et al. (2005) From nerves and hormones to bacteria in the stomach; Nobel prize for achievements in gastrology during last century. J Physiol Pharmacol 56: 507-536.

30. Marshall B (2006) Helicobacter connections. Chem Med Chem 1: 783-802.    

31. Woo KT, Lau YK, Yap HK, et al. (2006) 3rd College of Physicians' lecture--translational research: From bench to bedside and from bedside to bench; incorporating a clinical research journey in IgA nephritis (1976 to 2006). Ann Acad Med Singapore 35: 735-741.

32. Hamilton JG, Edwards HM, Khoury MJ, et al. (2014) Cancer screening and genetics: a tale of two paradigms. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 23: 909-916.    

33. Preston R (2000) The Genome Warrier. The New Yorker 76: 66-83.

34. Tchounwou PB, Toscano WA (2011) Environmental Epidemiology and Human Health-Biomarkers of Disease and Genetic Susceptibility In: Nriagu JO, editor. Encyclopedia of Environmentl Health Sciences. San Diego, CA: Elsevier, 357-366.

35. Teo S, Morgan M, Stirling D, et al. (2000) Assessment of the In Vitro and In Vivo Genotoxicity of Thalomid (Thalidomide). Teratog Carcinog Mutagen 20: 301-311.    

36. Portin P (2002) Historical Development of the Concept of the Gene. J Med Philosophy 27: 257-286.    

37. Crick FHC (1958) Central Dogma of Molecular Biology. Symp Soc Exp Biol XII 12: 139-173.

38. Crick FHC (1970) Central Dogma of Molecular Biology. Nature (London) 227: 561-563.    

39. Hahn WC, Weinberg RA (2002) Modeling the Molecular Circuitry of Cancer. Nat Rec Cancer 2: 331-341.    

40. Hocquette JF (2005) Where are we in genomics? J Physiol Pharmacol Suppl 3: 37-70.

41. Sharma S, Kelly TK, Jones PA (2010) Epigenetics in cancer. Carcinogenesis 31: 27-36.    

42. Long CR, Westhusin ME, Golding MC (2014) Reshaping the transcriptional frontier: epigenetics and somatic cell nuclear transfer. Mol Reprod Dev 81: 183-193.    

43. Nilsson E, Skinner MK (2014) Definitions and History of Generational Epigeneti Inheritance. In: Tollefsbol TO, editor. Translational Epigenetics: Evidence and Debate. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 11-24.

44. Hoile SP, Lillycrop KA, Grenfel LR, et al. (2014) Phenotypic and Epigenetic Inheritance Across Multiple Generations in Mammals through the Female Line. In: Tollefsbol TO, editor. Transgenerational Epigenetics: Evidence and Debate. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 269-278.

45. Mashoodh R, Champagne FA (2014) Paternal Epigenetic Inheritance. In: Tollefsbol TO, editor. Transgenerational Epigenetics: Evidence and Debate, 231-236.

46. Toscano WA, Oehlke KP (2011) Nutrigenomics: A New Frontier in Environmental Health Sciences. In: Nriagu JO, editor. Encyclopedia of Environmental Health Burlington, VT: Elsevier, 202-205.

47. Toscano WA, Oehlke KP, Kafouri R (2010) An Environmental Systems Biology Approach to the Study of Asthma. In: Pawnkar R, Holgate S, Rosenwasser LJ, editors. Allergy Frontiers: Future Perspectives. Springer: NY, NY, 239-252.

48. Toscano WAJ, Lee P, Oehlke KP (2008) The Role of Environmental Health Research in Understanding Chronic Conditions. Minn Physician 21: 27-28.

49. McLachlan JA (2001) Environmental Signaling: What Embryos and Evolution Teach us about Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals. Endocr Rev 22: 319-341.    

50. Vandenberg LN (2014) Non-monotonic Dose Responses in Studies of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals: Bisphenol-A as a Case Study. Dose-Response 12: 259-276.    

51. Vandenberg LN, Colborn T, Hayes TB, et al. (2012) Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses. Endocr Rev 33: 378-455.    

52. Vandenberg LN, Erlich S, Belcher SM, et al. (2013) Low-dose Effects of Bisphenol-A: An Integrated review of in vitro, Laboratory, Animal, and Epidemiology Studies. Endocrine Disruptors 1: 1-20.

53. CDC (2014) National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2014. Center for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA.

54. Misra A, Bhardwai S (2014) Obesity and the Metbolic Syndrome in Developing Countries: Focus on South Asians. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser 78: 133-140.    

55. Chase K, Sharma RP (2013) Epigenetic Developmental Programs and Adipogenesis - Implications for Psychotropic Induced Obesity. Epigenetics 8: 1133-1140.    

56. Janesick A, Blumberg B (2011) Minireview: PPARγ as the target of obesogens. J Ster Biochem & Mol Biol 127: 4-8.

57. Janesick A, Blumberg B (2011) The role of environmental obesogens in the obesity epidemic. Obesity before birth: Springer. 383-399.

58. Kishida K, Shimomura H, Nishizawa N, et al. (2001) Enhancement of the aquaporin adipose gene expression by a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. J Biol Chem 276: 48572-48579.

59. Grun F, Blumberg B (2009) Minireview: the case for obesogens. Mol Endocrinol 23: 1127-1134.    

60. Kemper MF, Stirone C, N. KD, et al. (2014) Genomic and non-genomic regulation of PGC1 isoforms by estrogen to increase cerebral vascular mitochondrial biogenesis and reactive oxygen species. Eur J Pharmacol 723: 322-329.    

61. Riu A, Grimaldi M, le Maire A, et al. (2011) Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Is a Target for Halogenated Analogs of Bisphenol A. Environ Health Perspect 119: 1227-1232.    

62. Swedenborg E, Ruegg J, Mäkelä S, et al. (2009) Endocrine disruptive chemicals: mechanisms of action and involvement in metabolic disorders. J Mol Endovrinol 43: 1-10.    

63. Willy PJ, Murray IR, Busch BB, et al. (2004) Regulation of PPARγ coactivator 1α (PGC-1α) signaling by an estrogen-related receptor α (ERRα) ligand. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 101: 8912-8917.    

64. Alaynick WA (2006) Nuclear Receptors, Mitochondria and Lipid Metabolism. Mitochondrion 8: 329-337.

65. Koo S-H, Satoh H, Herzig S, et al. (2004) PGC-1 Promotes Insulin Resistance in Liver through PPAR-alpha-dependent Induction of TRB-3. Nature Med 10: 530-534.    

66. Sargis RM, Johnson DN, Choudhury RA, et al. (2010) Environmental endocrine disruptors promote adipogenesis in the 3T3-L1 cell line through glucocorticoid receptor activation. Obesity 18: 1283-1288.    

67. Unterberger C, Stapls KJ, Smallie T, et al. (2008) Role of STAT3 in Glucocorticoid-induced Expression of the Human IL-10 Gene. Mol Immunol 45: 3230-3237.    

68. Tanaka T, Nobuiaki Y, Kishimoto T, et al. (1997) Defective Adipocyte Differentiation in Mice Lacking the C/EBP or C/EBP Gene. EMBO J 16: 7432-7443.    

69. Berger J, Tanen M, Elbrecht A, et al. (2001) Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor-γ Ligands Inhibit Adipocyte 11β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 1 Expression and Activity. J Biol Chem 276: 12629-12635.    

70. Fukazawa H, Hoshino K, Shiozawa T, et al. (2001) Identification and Quantification of Chlorinated Bisphenol A in Wastewater from Wastepaper Recycling Plants. Chemosphere 44: 973-979.    

71. Guerra P, Eljarrat E, Barcelo D (2010) Simultaneous Determination Hexabromocyclododecane, Tetrabromobisphenol A, and Related Compounds in Sewage Sludge and Sediment tsamples from the Ebro River Basin (Spain). Anal Bianal Chem 397: 2817-2824.    

72. Kolpin DW, Furlong ET, Meyer MT, et al. (2002) Pharmaceuticals, Hormones, and Other Organic Wastewater Contaminants in U.S. Streams, 1999-2000: A National Reconnaissance. Environ Sci Technol 36: 1202-1211.

73. Korshin G, Kim J, Gan L (2006) Comparative Study of Reactions of Endocrine Eisruptors, Bisphenol-A and Diethylstilbestrol in Electrochemical Treatment and Chlorination. Water Res 40: 1070-1078.    

74. Gallard H, Leclercq A, Croué J-P (2004) Chlorination of Bisphenol A: Kinetics and By-products Formation. Chemosphere 56: 465-473.    

75. Levian C, Ruiz E, Yang X (2014) The Pathogenesis of Obesity from a Genomic and Systems Biology Perspective. Yale J Biol Med 87: 113-126.

76. Zhao S, Iyengar R (2012) Systems pharmacology: Network analysis to identify multiscale mechanisms of drug action. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 52: 505-521.    

77. Toscano WA, Oehlke KP (2005) Systems Biology: New Approaches to Old Environmental Health Problems. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2: 4-9.    

78. Leischow SJ, Best A, Trochim WM, et al. (2008) Systems Thinking to Improve the Public's Health. Amer J Prev Med Suppl 2 35: S-196 - S-203.

79. Cox J, Mann M (2011) Quantitative, High-Resolution Proteomics for Data-Driven Systems Biology. Annu Rev Biochem 80: 273-299.    

80. Li H, Deng H (2010) Systems Genetics, Bioinformatics and eQTL Mapping. Genetica 138: 915-924.    

81. Majithia AR, Flannick J, Shahanian P, et al. (2014) Rare variants in PPARG with decreased activity in adipocyte differentiation are associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 111: 13127-13132.    

82. Hoffman S (2011) Computational Analysis of High Throughput Sequencing Data. Methods Mol Biol 719: 199-217.    

83. Dondorp WJ, de Wert GM (2013) The Thousand-Dollar Genome: An Ethical Exploration. Eur J Hum Genet Suppl 1: S6-S-26.

84. Zhang L, Kim S (2014) Learning Gene Networks under SNP Perturbations using eQTL Datasets. PLoS Comput Biol 10: e1003420.

85. Meaburn E, Schulz R (2012) Next generation sequencing in epigenetics: insights and challenges. Semin Cell Dev Biol 23: 192-199.    

86. Pellegrini M, Ferrri R (2012) Epigenetic analysis: ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq. Methods Mol Biol 802: 377-387.    

87. Ku CS, Naidoo N, Wu M, et al. (2011) Studying the epigenome using next generation sequencing. J Med Genet 48: 721-730.    

88. Patel CJ, Battacharya J, Butte AJ (2010) An Environment-Wide Association Study (EWAS) on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. PLoS One 5: e10746.    

89. Manolio TA, Brooks LD, Collins F (2008) A HapMap harvest of insights into the genetics of common disease. J Clin Invest 118: 1590-1605.    

90. Zeggini E, Weeden MN, Lindgren CM, et al. Replication of Genome-Wide Association Signals in UK Samples Reveals Risk Loci for Type 2 Diabetes. Science (Washington) 316: 1336-1341.

91. Ioannidis J, Loy EY, Poulton R, et al. (2009) Researching Nongenetic Determinants of Disease A Comparison and Proposed Unification. Sci Transl Med 1: 7ps8.

92. Davis AP, Rosenstein MC, Wiegers TC, et al. (2011) DiseaseComps: a metric that discovers similar diseases based upon common toxicogenomic profiles at CTD. Bioinformation 7: 154-156.    

Copyright Info: © 2014, Jr., et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved