Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Zein nanocapsules as a tool for surface passivation, drug delivery and biofilm prevention

1 Colleges of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, SUNY Polytechnic Institute, Albany, New York, USA
2 Department of Chemistry, University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, New York, USA

Topical Section: Microbial biofilms

Current oral hygiene treatments focus on managing oral biofilms (i.e. dental plaque) by broad antimicrobial strategies, indiscriminately killing both pathogenic and commensal microorganisms present in the oral cavity. In an effort to identify alternative approaches to antimicrobials, several research groups, including our own, have identified small molecule inhibitors that interrupt cell-cell signaling and biofilm formation, with potential to be selective against pathogens while leaving commensal flora unperturbed. A drawback to such inhibitors is their limited efficacy when used in acute exposures (e.g. mouthwash or brushing). In order to enhance bioavailability and maximize efficacy of these agents in a complex and dynamic environment such as the oral cavity, it is necessary to maintain a constant reservoir of the agents in situ. Therefore, we formulated a biofilm inhibitor delivery system by encapsulating an inhibitor of Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation, S-phenyl-L-cysteine sulfoxide, into zein nanocapsules. Nanocapsules formed 110–235 nm particles in a liquid-liquid dispersion synthesis procedure with S-phenyl-L-cysteine sulfoxide, as determined by dynamic light scattering. The inhibitor-loaded nanocapsules were then used to cast a film and subsequent S. mutans biofilm formation at this surface was studied. Nanocapsule films loaded with biofilm inhibitors were shown to deter early S. mutans biofilm development at 24 h, as well as reduce total viable biofilm-recovered cells at 48 h. This demonstrates proof-of-concept that biofilm inhibitor-loaded zein nanocapsules can reduce S. mutans biofilm growth, and demonstrates a new approach to extend the time that dental plaque inhibitors are present at the tooth surface. This approach has the potential to delay recolonization of the tooth and reduce oral infection/disease.
  Article Metrics

Keywords biofilms; nanocapsules; biofilm inhibitors; oral biofilms; surface modification; drug delivery

Citation: Stephen H. Kasper, Ryan Hart, Magnus Bergkvist, Rabi A. Musah, Nathaniel C. Cady. Zein nanocapsules as a tool for surface passivation, drug delivery and biofilm prevention. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(4): 422-433. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.4.422


  • 1. Kolenbrander PE, Palmer RJ, Rickard AH, et al. (2006) Bacterial interactions and successions during plaque development. Periodontol 2000 42: 47–79.    
  • 2. Marsh PD, Moter A, Devine DA (2011) Dental plaque biofilms: communities, conflict and control. Periodontol 2000 55: 16–35.    
  • 3. Costerton JW (1999) Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284: 1318–1322.    
  • 4. Costalonga M, Herzberg MC (2014) The oral microbiome and the immunobiology of periodontal disease and caries. Immunol Lett 162: 22–38.    
  • 5. Kumar PS (2013) Oral microbiota and systemic disease. Anaerobe 24: 90–93.    
  • 6. Han YW, Wang X (2013) Mobile microbiome: oral bacteria in extra-oral infections and inflammation. J Dent Res 92: 485–91.    
  • 7. Scannapieco FA, Cantos A (2016) Oral inflammation and infection, and chronic medical diseases: implications for the elderly. Periodontol 2000 72: 153–175.    
  • 8. Marsh PD (2010) Controlling the oral biofilm with antimicrobials. J Dent 38: S11–S15.    
  • 9. Huang R, Li M, Gregory RL (2011) Bacterial interactions in dental biofilm. Virulence 2: 435–444.    
  • 10. Kasper SH, Samarian D, Jadhav AP, et al. (2014) S-aryl-L-cysteine sulphoxides and related organosulphur compounds alter oral biofilm development and AI-2-based cell-cell communication. J Appl Microbiol 117: 1472–1486.    
  • 11. Liu C, Worthington RJ, Melander C, et al. (2011) A new small molecule specifically inhibits the cariogenic bacterium Streptococcus mutans in multispecies biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55: 2679–2687.    
  • 12. He Z, Wang Q, Hu Y, et al. (2012) Use of the quorum sensing inhibitor furanone C-30 to interfere with biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans and its luxS mutant strain. Int J Antimicrob Agents 40: 30–35.    
  • 13. Kunze B, Reck M, Dötsch A, et al. (2010) Damage of Streptococcus mutans biofilms by carolacton, a secondary metabolite from the myxobacterium Sorangium cellulosum. BMC Microbiol 10: 199.    
  • 14. Eguchi Y, Kubo N, Matsunaga H, et al. (2011) Development of an antivirulence drug against Streptococcus mutans: repression of biofilm formation, acid tolerance, and competence by a histidine kinase inhibitor, walkmycin C. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55: 1475–1484.    
  • 15. Jones MN, Francis SE, Hutchinson FJ, et al. (1993) Targeting and delivery of bactericide to adsorbed oral bacteria by use of proteoliposomes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1147: 251–261.    
  • 16. Robinson AM, Creeth JE, Jones MN (2000) The use of immunoliposomes for specific delivery of antimicrobial agents to oral bacteria immobilized on polystyrene. J Biomater Sci 11: 1381–1393.    
  • 17. Jones MN (2005) Use of liposomes to deliver bactericides to bacterial biofilms. Methods Enzymol 391: 211–228.    
  • 18. Chen F, Liu XM, Rice KC, et al. (2009) Tooth-binding micelles for dental caries prevention. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53: 4898–4902.    
  • 19. Chen F, Jia Z, Rice KC, et al. (2013) The development of dentotropic micelles with biodegradable tooth-binding moieties. Pharm Res 30: 2808–2817.    
  • 20. Chen F, Rice KC, Liu XM, et al. (2010) Triclosan-loaded tooth-binding micelles for prevention and treatment of dental biofilm, Pharm Res 27: 2356–2364.
  • 21. Horev B, Klein MI, Hwang G, et al. (2015) pH-activated nanoparticles for controlled topical delivery of farnesol to disrupt oral biofilm virulence. ACS Nano 9: 2390–2404.    
  • 22. Radovic-Moreno AF, Lu TK, Puscasu VA, et al. (2012) Surface charge-switching polymeric nanoparticles for bacterial cell wall-targeted delivery of antibiotics. ACS Nano 6: 4279–4287.    
  • 23. Hannig M, Hannig C (2010) Nanomaterials in preventive dentistry. Nat Nanotechnol 5: 565–569.    
  • 24. Nie B, Chen T, Liang M, et al. (2010) The use of nanoparticles to control oral biofilm formation. J Dent Res 89: 1175–1186.    
  • 25. Murdan S (2005) Formulation and characterisation of zein microspheres as delivery vehicles. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 15: 267–272.
  • 26. Shukla R, Cheryan M (2001) Zein: the industrial protein from corn. Ind Crops Prod 13: 171–192.    
  • 27. Elzoghby AO, Samy WM, Elgindy NA (2012) Protein-based nanocarriers as promising drug and gene delivery systems. J Control Release 161: 38–49.    
  • 28. Regier MC, Taylor JD, Borcyk T, et al. (2012) Fabrication and characterization of DNA-loaded zein nanospheres. J Nanobiotechnology 10: 44.    
  • 29. Wang HJ, Lin ZX, Liu XM, et al. (2005) Heparin-loaded zein microsphere film and hemocompatibility. J Control Release 105: 120–131.    
  • 30. Torres-Giner S, Martinez-Abad A, Ocio MJ, et al. (2010) Stabilization of a nutraceutical omega-3 fatty acid by encapsulation in ultrathin electrosprayed zein prolamine. J Food Sci 75: N69–N79.    
  • 31. Luo Y, Teng Z, Wang Q (2012) Development of zein nanoparticles coated with carboxymethyl chitosan for encapsulation and controlled release of vitamin D3. J Agric Food Chem 60: 836–843.    
  • 32. Fu JX, Wang HJ, Zhou YQ, et al. (2009) Antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin-loaded zein microsphere films. Mater Sci Eng C 29: 1161–1166.    
  • 33. Panchapakesan C, Sozer N, Dogan H, et al. (2012) Effect of different fractions of zein on the mechanical and phase properties of zein films at nano-scale. J Cereal Sci 55: 174–182.    
  • 34. Cady NC, McKean KA, Behnke J, et al. (2012) Inhibition of biofilm formation, quorum sensing and infection in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by natural products-inspired organosulfur compounds. PLoS One 7: e38492.    
  • 35. Welin J, Wilkins JC, Beighton D, et al. (2004) Protein expression by Streptococcus mutans during initial stage of biofilm formation. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 3736–3741.    
  • 36. Koo H, Hayacibara MF, Schobel BD, et al. (2003) Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans biofilm accumulation and polysaccharide production by apigenin and tt-farnesol, J Antimicrob Chemother 52: 782–789.
  • 37. Merritt J, Qi F, Goodman SD, et al. (2003) Mutation of luxS affects biofilm formation in Streptococcus mutans. Infect Immun 71: 1972–1979.    
  • 38. Landini P, Antoniani D, Burgess JG, et al. (2010) Molecular mechanisms of compounds affecting bacterial biofilm formation and dispersal. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86: 813–823.    
  • 39. Whitchurch CB, Tolker-Nielsen T, Ragas PC, et al. (2002) Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation. Science 295: 1487–1487.    
  • 40. Perry JA, Cvitkovitch DG, Levesque CM (2009) Cell death in Streptococcus mutans biofilms: a link between CSP and extracellular DNA. FEMS Microbiol Lett 299: 261–266.    
  • 41. Allaker RP, Memarzadeh K (2014) Nanoparticles and the control of oral infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 43: 95–104.
  • 42. Melo MAS, Guedes SFF, Xu HHK, et al. (2013) Nanotechnology-based restorative materials for dental caries management. Trends Biotechnol 31: 459–467.    
  • 43. Benoit DSW, Koo H (2016) Targeted, triggered drug delivery to tumor and biofilm microenvironments. Nanomedicine 11: 873–879.    
  • 44. Forier K, Raemdonck K, De Smedt SC, et al. (2014) Lipid and polymer nanoparticles for drug delivery to bacterial biofilms. J Control Release 190: 607–623.    
  • 45. Torres-Giner S, Ocio MJ, Lagaron JM (2009) Novel antimicrobial ultrathin structures of zein/chitosan blends obtained by electrospinning. Carbohydr Polym 77: 261–266.    
  • 46. Del Nobile MA, Conte A, Incoronato AL, et al. (2008) Antimicrobial efficacy and release kinetics of thymol from zein films. J Food Eng 89: 57–63.    
  • 47. Dawson PL, Hirt DE, Rieck JR, et al. (2003) Nisin release from films is affected by both protein type and film-forming method. Food Res Int 36: 959–968.    
  • 48. Sousa FFO, Luzardo-Alvarez A, Pérez-Estévéz A, et al. (2010) Development of a novel AMX-loaded PLGA/zein microsphere for root canal disinfection. Biomed Mater 5: 055008.    
  • 49. de Sousa FO, Blanco-Méndez J, Pérez-Estévez A, et al. (2012) Effect of zein on biodegradable inserts for the delivery of tetracycline within periodontal pockets. J Biomater Appl 27: 187–200.    
  • 50. Yun J, Fan X, Li X, et al. (2015) Natural surface coating to inactivate Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and maintain quality of cherry tomatoes. Int J Food Microbiol 193: 59–67.    
  • 51. Lai LF, Guo HX (2011) Preparation of new 5-fluorouracil-loaded zein nanoparticles for liver targeting. Int J Pharm 404: 317–323.    
  • 52. Muthuselvi L, Dhathathreyan A (2006) Simple coacervates of zein to encapsulate Gitoxin. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 51: 39–43.    
  • 53. Chen L, Subirade M (2009) Elaboration and characterization of soy/zein protein microspheres for controlled nutraceutical delivery. Biomacromolecules 10: 3327–3334.    


This article has been cited by

  • 1. Aleksandra Ivanova, Kristina Ivanova, Tzanko Tzanov, , Biotechnological Applications of Quorum Sensing Inhibitors, 2018, Chapter 1, 3, 10.1007/978-981-10-9026-4_1
  • 2. Arnau Bassegoda, Kristina Ivanova, Eva Ramon, Tzanko Tzanov, Strategies to prevent the occurrence of resistance against antibiotics by using advanced materials, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2018, 102, 5, 2075, 10.1007/s00253-018-8776-0

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

Copyright Info: 2016, Nathaniel C. Cady, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved