Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Fully Bayesian analysis of allele-specific RNA-seq data

1 Instituto de Estadística, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
2 Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Iowa, IA 50010, USA

Special Issues: Recent Advancements on Quantitative Methods for Genomics and Genetics

Diploid organisms have two copies of each gene, called alleles, that can be separately transcribed. The RNA abundance associated to any particular allele is known as allele-specific expression (ASE). When two alleles have polymorphisms in transcribed regions, ASE can be studied using RNA-seq read count data. ASE has characteristics different from the regular RNA-seq expression: ASE cannot be assessed for every gene, measures of ASE can be biased towards one of the alleles (reference allele), and ASE provides two measures of expression for a single gene for each biological samples with leads to additional complications for single-gene models. We present statistical methods for modeling ASE and detecting genes with differential allelic expression. We propose a hierarchical, overdispersed, count regression model to deal with ASE counts. The model accommodates gene-specific overdispersion, has an internal measure of the reference allele bias, and uses random effects to model the gene-specific regression parameters. Fully Bayesian inference is obtained using the fbseq package that implements a parallel strategy to make the computational times reasonable. Simulation and real data analysis suggest the proposed model is a practical and powerful tool for the study of differential ASE.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

References

1. S. Datta and D. Nettleton, Statistical Analysis of Next Generation Sequencing Data, Springer, 2014. Available from: http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-07212-8.pdf.

2. W. Sun and Y. Hu, Mapping of expression quantitative trait loci using RNA-seq data, in Statistical Analysis of Next Generation Sequencing Data (eds. D. Nettleton and S. Datta), 2014, 25–50.

3. P. S. Schnable and N. M. Springer, Progress toward understanding heterosis in crop plants, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 64 (2013), 71–88.

4. A. Paschold, Y. Jia, C. Marcon, et al., Complementation contributes to transcriptome complexity in maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids relative to their inbred parents., Genome Res., 22 (2012), 2445–2454.

5. G. D. M. Bell, N. C. Kane, L. H. Rieseberg, et al., RNA-Seq analysis of allele-specific expression, hybrid effects, and regulatory divergence in hybrids compared with their parents from natural populations, Genome Biol. Evol., 5 (2013), 1309–1323.

6. J. K. Pickrell, J. C. Marioni, A. A. Pai, et al., Understanding mechanisms underlying human gene expression variation with rna sequencing, Nature, 464 (2010), 768–772.

7. W. Sun and Y. Hu, eQTL Mapping Using RNA-seq Data, Stat. Biosci., 5 (2013), 198–219.

8. C. T. Harvey, G. A. Moyerbrailean, G. O. Davis, et al., Quasar: quantitative allele-specific analysis of reads, Bioinformatics, 31 (2014), 1235–1242.

9. N. Raghupathy, K. Choi, M. J. Vincent, et al., Hierarchical analysis of RNA-seq reads improves the accuracy of allele-specific expression, Bioinformatics, 34 (2018), 2177–2184.

10. S. Srivastava and L. Chen, A two-parameter generalized Poisson model to improve the analysis of RNA-seq data., Nucleic Acids Res., 38 (2010), e170.

11. X. Wei and X. Wang, A computational workflow to identify allele-specific expression and epigenetic modification in maize., Genom. Proteom. Bioinf., 11 (2013), 247–252.

12. M. D. Robinson, D. J. McCarthy and G. K. Smyth, edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data., Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 26 (2010), 139–140.

13. D. J. Lorenz, R. S. Gill, R. Mitra, et al., Using RNA-seq Data to Detect Differentially Expressed Genes, in Statistical Analysis of Next Generation Sequencing Data (eds. S. Datta and D. Nettleton), 2014, chapter 2, 25–49.

14. Y.-J. Hu, W. Sun, J.-Y. Tzeng, et al., Proper use of allele-specific expression improves statistical power for cis -eQTL mapping with RNA-seq data, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 110 (2015), 962–974.

15. W. Landau, J. Niemi and D. Nettleton, Fully bayesian analysis of rna-seq counts for the detection of gene expression heterosis, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 114 (2019), 601–612.

16. N. I. Panousis, M. Gutierrez-Arcelus, E. T. Dermitzakis, et al., Allelic mapping bias in RNA-sequencing is not a major confounder in eQTL studies, Genome. Biol., 15 (2014), 467.

17. J. F. Degner, J. C. Marioni, A. A. Pai, et al., Effect of read-mapping biases on detecting allele-specific expression from RNA-sequencing data, Bioinformatics, 25 (2009), 3207–3212.

18. R. Vijaya Satya, N. Zavaljevski and J. Reifman, A new strategy to reduce allelic bias in RNA-Seq readmapping, Nucleic Acids Res., 40 (2012), 1–9.

19. K. R. Stevenson, J. D. Coolon and P. J. Wittkopp, Sources of bias in measures of allele-specific expression derived from RNA-sequence data aligned to a single reference genome., BMC Genom., 14 (2013), 536.

20. Y. Chen, A. T. L. Lun and G. K. Smyth, Differential expression analysis of complex RNA-seq experiments using edgeR, in Statistical Analysis of Next Generation Sequencing Data, Springer, Cham, 2014, 51–74.

21. T. Park and G. Casella, The Bayesian lasso, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 103 (2008), 681–686.

22. C. M. Carvalho, N. G. Polson and J. G. Scott, Handling Sparsity via the Horseshoe, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 5 (2009), 73–80.

23. A. Gelman, Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models, Bayesian Analysis, 1 (2006), 515–533.

24. A. Gelman, J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern,et al., Bayesian Data Analysis, CRC press, 2013.

25. J. K. Ghosh, M. Delampady and T. Samanta, An Introduction to Bayesian Analysis, Springer, 2006. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118684818.ch16/summary.

26. L. G. León-Novelo, L. M. McIntyre, J. M. Fear, et al., A flexible Bayesian method for detecting allelic imbalance in RNA-seq data, BMC Genom., 15 (2014), 920.

27. J. Niemi, E. Mittman, W. Landau, et al., Empirical Bayes analysis of RNA-seq data for detection of gene expression heterosis, J. Agr. Biol. Envir. St., 20 (2015), 614–628.

28. M. A. Van De Wiel, G. G. R. Leday, L. Pardo, et al., Bayesian analysis of RNA sequencing data by estimating multiple shrinkage priors, Biostatistics, 14 (2013), 113–128.

29. W. Landau and J. Niemi, A fully Bayesian strategy for high-dimensional hierarchical modeling using massively parallel computing, 2016. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06659.

30. A. Lithio and D. Nettleton, Hierarchical modeling and differential expression analysis for RNA-seq experiments with inbred and hybrid genotypes, J. Agr. Biol. Envir. St., 20 (2015), 598–613.

31. M. Ventrucci, E. M. Scott and D. Cocchi, Multiple testing on standardized mortality ratios: a Bayesian hierarchical model for FDR estimation, Biostatistics, 12 (2011), 51–67.

32. P. Muller, G. Parmigiani and K. Rice, FDR and Bayesian multiple comparisons ules, 2006. Available from: http://biostats.bepress.com/jhubiostat/paper115.

33. H. Y. Bar, J. G. Booth and M. T. Wells, A bivariate model for simultaneous testing in bioinformatics data, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 109 (2014), 537–547.

34. P. Müller, G. Parmigiani, C. Robert, et al., Optimal sample size for multiple testing: the case of gene expression microarrays, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 99 (2004), 990–1001.

35. S. Anders and W. Huber, Differential expression analysis for sequence count data, Genome Biol., 11 (2010), R106.

36. P. R. Hahn and J. He, Elliptical slice sampling for Bayesian shrinkage regression with applications to causal inference, 2016. Available from: http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/richard. hahn/JCGS_submit.pdf.

37. M. C. Sachs, plotROC: A tool for plotting roc curves, J. Stat. Software, 79 (2017), 1–19.

38. Y. Benjamini and Y. Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, J. R. Stat. Soc-B, 57 (1995), 289–300.

39. P. S. Schnable, D. Ware, R. S. Fulton, et al., The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics, Science, 326 (2009), 1112–1115.

© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved