Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Double-robot obstacle avoidance path optimization for welding process

Key Laboratory of Advanced Control and Optimization for Chemical Processes of Ministry of Education,East China University of Science and Technology,Shanghai 200237, China

Special Issues: Multi-scale modeling and simulation of different welding processes

For path planning of two welding robots, intelligent robot path optimization with obstacle avoidance is introduced first, where the optimization objective is the shortest time. In the optimization process, grid method is used for modeling. Then, ant colony algorithm is applied as search strategy to realize obstacle avoidance between welding gun and workpiece. For obstacle avoidance of robot joints, the robot is modeled using the sphere and the capsule. Besides, two-level collision detection and geometrical collision avoidance are used to obtain collision free robots’ path. At last, an improved particle swarm optimization algorithm is used to realize global path planning. Simulation results show that the proposed strategy could improve the effectiveness of the path planning. It can be used to shorten the teaching time and strengthen offline programming ability.
  Article Metrics


1. L. J. Zhang, J. Ning, X. J. Zhang, et al., Single pass hybrid laser–mig welding of 4-mm thick copper without preheating, Mater. Design, 74 (2015), 1–18.

2. X. W. Wang, Y. P. Shi, D. Y. Ding, et al., Double global optimum genetic algorithm–particle swarm optimization based welding robot path planning, Eng. Optimiz., 48 (2016), 299–316.

3. Z. T. Wang, Z. L. Feng, G. Y. Ye, et al., Path planning of double robot based on artificial bee colony algorithm, Trans. China Weld. Inst., 2 (2015), 97–100.

4. A. Kovács, Integrated task sequencing and path planning for robotic remote laser welding, Int. J. Prod. Res., 4 (2016), 1210–1224.

5. M. Givehchi, A. H. C. Ng and L. Wang, Spot-welding sequence planning and optimization using a hybrid rule-based approach and genetic algorithm, Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 4 (2011), 714–722.

6. J. Kennedy and R. C. Eberhart, Particle swarm optimization, Process of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, Australia: IEEE Service Center, (1995), 1942–1948.

7. M. J. Amoshahy, M. Shamsi and M. H. Sedaaghi, A novel flexible inertia weight particle swarm optimization algorithm, PLoS One, 38 (2016), 281–295.

8. B. Najeh, Improved accelerated PSO algorithm for mechanical engineering optimization problems, Appl. Soft. Comput., 40 (2016), 455–467.

9. Y. Ye, C. B. Yin, Y. Gong, et al., Position control of nonlinear hydraulic system using an improved PSO based PID controller, Mech. Syst. Signal Proc., 83 (2017), 241–259.

10. A. Benvidi, S. Abbasi, S. Gharaghani, et al., Spectrophotometric determination of synthetic colorants using PSO–GA-ANN, Food Chem., 220 (2017), 377–384.

11. D. Q. Wu and J. G. Zheng, Parallel particle swarm optimization algorithm based on hybrid strategy adaptive learning. J. Control Decis., 28 (2013), 1087–1093.

12. X. Y. Qu, L. Ma and C. Z. Yao, Research of collision detection algorithm based on hybrid bounding box for complex environment. IEEE ICICM, (2017), 248–252.

13. Y. F. Zhu and J. Meng, Efficient Approach Based on Hybrid Bounding Volume Hierarchy for Real-time Collision Detection, J. Syst. Simulat., 19 (2008), 5099–5104.

14. Y. J. Yan and Y. Zhang, Collision avoidance planning in multi-robot based on improved artificial potential field and rules. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE ROBIO, Bangkok, Thailand, (2009), 1026–1031.

15. X. W. Wang, Y. X. Yan and X. S. Gu, Spot welding robot path planning using intelligent algorithm. J. Manuf. Process., 42 (2019), 1–10.

16. N. Kousi, G. Michalos, S. Aivaliotis, et al., An outlook on future assembly systems introducing robotic mobile dual arm workers. Procedia CIRP, 72 (2018), 33–38.

17. S. Makris, P. Tsarouchi, A. S. Matthaiakis, et al., Dual arm robot in cooperation with humans for flexible assembly. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Tech., 66 (2017), 13–16.

© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved