Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Numerical simulation of submerged flow bridge scour under dam-break flow using multi-phase SPH method

1 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Transport and Communications, 3 Cau Giay, Lang Thuong, Dong Da, Hanoi, Vietnam
2 Mines Douai, Department of Polymers and Composites Technology & Mechanical Engineering, 941 rue Charles Bourseul, CS 10838, F-59508 Douai Cedex France

Special Issues: Mathematical Methods in Civil Engineering

This paper presents a coupled two-phase flow model for simulation of submerged flow bridge scour under dam-break flows considering the sediment-fluid interaction. The Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) method is employed to simulate the sediment and fluid movements based on the Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids, respectively, in the framework of two-phase flow modeling. The SPH simulation based on the treatment of Bingham-type Herschel-Bulkley-Papanastasiou constitutive model and the Drucker-Prager yield criterion is used to predict the sediment transport and the scour depth time histories under a submerged bridge deck. The influence of parameters such as geometry of the bridge deck and flow conditions on the scour depth is also investigated.
  Article Metrics


1. L. M. Abed, Local scour around bridge piers in pressure flow, Ph.D dissertation, Colorado State Univ. Fort Collins, Colo, (1991).

2. J. S. Jones, D. A. Bertoldi and E. R. Umbrell, Preliminary studies of pressure-flow scour, ASCE Conf. Hydr. Engrg., (1993).

3. L. A. Arneson, The effect of pressure-flow on local scour in bridge openings, Ph.D thesis, Dept. Civil Eng., Colorado State Univ. Fort Collins, Colo, (1997).

4. E. R. Umbrell, G. K. Young, S. M. Stein, et al., Clear-water contraction scour under bridges in pressure flow, J. Hydraul. Eng., 124 (1998), 236–240.

5. D. A. Lyn, Pressure-flow scour: A reexamination of the HEC-18 equation, J. Hydraul. Eng. ASCE, 137 (2008), 1015–1020.

6. J. Guo, K. Kerenyi and J. E. Pagan-Ortiz, Bridge pressure flow scour for clear water conditions, FHWA-HRT09-041, United States Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, (2009).

7. E. M. Hahn and D. A. Lyn, Anomalous contraction scour? Vertical-contraction case, J. Hydraul. Eng. ASCE, 136 (2010), 137–141.

8. Y. Zhai, Time-dependent scour depth under bridge-submerged flow, Civil Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, (2010).

9. S. Y. Kumcu, Steady and unsteady pressure scour under bridges at clear-water conditions, Can. J. Civil Eng., 43 (2016), 334–342.

10. O. E. A. Agertz, Fundamental differences between SPH and grid methods, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 380 (2007), 963–978.

11. J. J. Monaghan, Smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Rep. Prog. Phys., 68 (2005), 1703–1759.

12. R. A. Gingold and J. J. Monaghan, Smoothed particle hydrodynamics theory and application to no spherical stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 181 (1997), 375–389.

13. L. B. Lucy, A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis, Astron. J., 82 (1997), 1013–1024.

14. N. Q. Bao, Fiabilité des installations industrielles sous impact de fragment de structures –Effet Domino, Ph.D thesis, Paris–Est, France, (2009).

15. F. Xu, Y. Zhao, R. Yan, et al., Multidimensional discontinuous SPH method and its application to metal penetration analysis, J. Numer. Meth. Engng., 93 (2013), 1125–1146.

16. K. Shintatea and H. Sekine, Numerical simulation of hypervelocity impacts of a projectile on laminated composite plate targets by means of improved SPH method., Compos. Part A-Appl. S., 35 (2004), 683–691.

17. H. T. Nguyen, Contribution on modeling of the rotational molding process, Ph.D thesis, Lille University of Science and Technology., France, (2014).

18. H. T. Nguyen, C. Benoît, L. Marie-France, et al., Numerical simulation of reactive polymer flow during rotational molding using smoothed particle hydrodynamics method and experimental verification, Int. J. Mater. Form., 11 (2017), 583–592.

19. S. Shao and E. Y. M. Lo, Incompressible SPH method for simulating Newtonian and non-Newtonian flows with a free surface, Adv. Water Resour., 26 (2003), 787–800.

20. H. Gotoh and A. Khayyer, On the state-of-the-art of particle methods for coastal and ocean engineering, Coast. Eng. J., 60 (2018), 79–103.

21. H. Ha, K. Sakoand R. Fukagawa, Numerical simulation of soil–water interaction using smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method, J. Terramechanics, 44 (2007), 339–346.

22. G. Fourtakas, B. D. Rogers and D. Laurence, 3-D SPH Modelling of Sediment Scouring Induced by Rapid Flows, 9th International SPHERIC SPH Workshop, Paris, France, (2014).

23. H. Z. Elizabeth, G. Fourtakas, B. D. Rogers, et al., Multi-phase SPH model for simulation of erosion and scouring by means of the Shields and Drucker-Prager criteria, Adv. Water Resour., 117 (2018), 98–114.

24. G. Fourtakas and B. D. Rogers, Modelling multi-phase liquid-sediment scour and resuspension induced by rapid flows using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) accelerated with a Graphics Processing Unit (GPU), Multi-phase SPH model for simulation of erosion and scouring by means of the Shields and Drucker-Prager criteria, Adv. Water Resour., 92 (2016), 186–199.

25. G. Fourtakas, Modelling multi-phase flows in Nuclear Decommissioning using SPH, Ph.D thesis, University of Manchester, United Kingdom, (2016).

26. Y. Zech, S. Soares-Frazão, B. Spinewine, et al., Dam-break induced sediment movement: Experimental approaches and numerical modelling, J. Hydraul. Res., 46 (2008), 176–190.

27. S. Ovaysi and M. Piri, Multi-GPU Acceleration of Direct Pore-Scale Modeling of Fluid Flow in Natural Porous Media, Comput. Phys. Commun., 183 (2012), 1890–1898.

28. A. Khayyer, H. Gotoh, Y. Shimizu, et al., An Enhanced Particle Method for Simulation of Fluid Flow Interactions with Saturated Porous Media, J. Japan Soc. Civil Eng. Ser. B2, 73 (2017), 841–846.

29. A. Khayyer, H. Gotoh, Y. Shimizu, et al., Development of a projection-based SPH method for numerical wave flume with porous media of variable porosity, Coast. Eng., 140 (2018), 1–22.

30. S. Manenti, S. Sibilla, M. Gallati, et al., SPH Simulation of Sediment Flushing Induced by a Rapid Water Flow, J. Hydraul. Eng. ASCE, 138 (2012), 272–284.

31. S. Marrone, A. Colagrossi, J. S. Park, et al., Challenges on the Numerical Prediction of Slamming Loads on LNG Tank Insulation Panels, Ocean Eng., 141 (2017), 512–530.

32. B. Bouscasse, B. Bouscasse, A. Colagrossi, et al., SPH Modelling of Viscous Flow past a Circular Cylinder Interacting with a Free Surface, Comput. Fluids, 146 (2017), 190–212.

33. H. Bui and G. D. Nguyen, A Coupled Fluid-Solid SPH Approach to Modelling Flow through Deformable Porous Media, Int. J. Solids Struct., 125 (2017), 244–264.

34. S. Zou, Coastal Sediment Transport Simulation by Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics, Ph.D thesis, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, (2007).

35. M. X. Rodriguez-Paz and J. Bonet, A corrected smooth particle hydrodynamics method for the simulation of debris flows, Numer. Meth. Part. D. E., 20 (2004), 140–163.

36. C. Ulrich, M. Leonardiand T. Rung, Multi-physics SPH simulation of complex marine-engineering hydrodynamic problems, Ocean Eng., 64 (2013), 109–121.

37. Y. Shi, S. Li, H. Chen, et al., Improved SPH Simulation of Spilled Oil Contained by Flexible Floating Boom under Wave–Current Coupling Condition, J. Fluid. Struct., 76 (2018), 272–300.

38. C. Altomare, J. M. Domínguez, A. J. C. Crespo, et al., Hybridization of the Wave Propagation Model SWASH and the Meshfree Particle Method SPH for Real Coastal Applications, Coast. Eng. J., 57 (2015), 1-34.

39. A. Ghaïtanellis, V. Damien, F. Martin, et al., A SPH Elastic-Viscoplastic Model for Granular flows and Bed-Load Transport, Adv. Water Resour., 111 (2018), 156–173.

40. E. Harada, H. Ikari, Y. Shimizu, et al., Numerical Investigation of the Morphological Dynamics of a Step and Pool Riverbed Using DEM-MPS, J. Hydraul. Eng., 144 (2018), 04017058.

41. L. Wang, A. Khayyer, H. Gotoh, et al., Enhancement of pressure calculation in projection-based particle methods by incorporation of background mesh scheme, Appl. Ocean Res., 86 (2019), 320–339.

42. S. Koshizuka and Y. Oka, Moving-particle semi-implicit method for fragmentation of incompressible fluid, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 123 (1996), 421–434.

43. Y. Shimizu, H. Gotoh and A. Khayyer, An MPS-based particle method for simulation of multiphase flows characterized by high density ratios by incorporation of space potential particle concept, Comput. Math. Appl., 76 (2018), 1108–1129.

44. E. Harada, H. Gotoh, H. Ikari, et al., Numerical Simulation for Sediment Transport Using MPS-DEM Coupling Model, Adv. Water Resour., (2017).

45. E. Harada, H. Ikari, A. Khayyer, et al., Numerical simulation for swash morphodynamics by DEM–MPS coupling model, Coast. Eng. J., 61 (2019), 2–14.

46. Y. He, E. A. Bayly, A. Hassanpour, et al., A GPU-based coupled SPH-DEM method for particle-fluid flow with free surfaces, Powder Technol., 338 (2018), 548–562.

47. H. Gotoh, S. Shao and T. Memita, SPH-LES model for numerical investigation of wave interaction with partially immersed breakwater, Coast. Eng., 46 (2004), 39–63.

48. S. Shao and H. Gotoh, Simulating Coupled Motion of Progressive Wave and Floating Curtain Wall by SPH-LES Model, Coast. Eng. J., 46 (2004), 171–202.

49. P. W. Cleary, Modelling confined multi-material heat and mass flows using SPH, Appl. Math. Model., 22 (1998), 981–993.

© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved