Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Influence of infill density on microstructure and flexural behavior of 3D printed PLA thermoplastic parts processed by fusion deposition modeling

1 Digital Manufacturing Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Department, Qassim University, Buraidah 51452, Saudi Arabia
2 Metallurgical and Materials Engineering Department, Faculty of Petroleum and Mining Engineering, Suez University, Suez, Egypt

The main goal of the present work was to investigate the influence of infill density (ID) on microstructure and flexural behavior of 3D printed parts by conducting three points bending test (3PBT). Flexural behavior of 3D printed parts is mainly dependent on ID which applied during printing. A thermoplastic of poly-lactic acid (PLA) was selected as material which can be best suitable for artificial tissue/bone engineering applications. Further, most of the artificial bones/tissues are subjected to fail due to bending load. Therefore, the effect of ID on the flexural strength of PLA (Bio-degradable) materials is important; which was addressed through this research work. Here, the PLA material was printed using fusion deposition modeling (FDM) by varying ID (40, 60, 80, and 100%). The 3D printed cylindrical specimen of 15 mm in diameter and 30 mm span was used. The bending responses in terms of bending stress-strain and bending force-deflection at each ID were investigated and reported. Furthermore, the fracture bending stress, fracture bending strain, flexural modulus, and stiffness of the printed sample were measured and correlated to the ID. The experimental result has shown that the bending characteristics influenced a strong correlation with ID percentage. The result suggested that the 80% ID was the optimum percentage which possessed considerable strength and toughness. Besides, the specimen surface morphology and the fracture topography were investigated and reported.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

Keywords poly-lactic acid; fusion deposition modeling, infill density; bending stress-strain; microstructure

Citation: Bandar Abdullah Aloyaydi, Subbarayan Sivasankaran, Hany Rizk Ammar. Influence of infill density on microstructure and flexural behavior of 3D printed PLA thermoplastic parts processed by fusion deposition modeling. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(6): 1033-1048. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.6.1033

References

  • 1. Francis V, Jain PK (2018) Investigation on the effect of surface modification of 3D printed parts by nanoclay and dimethyl ketone. Mater Manuf Process 33: 1080-1092.    
  • 2. Ahn S-H, Montero M, Odell D, et al. (2002) Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyp J 8: 248-257.    
  • 3. Lanzotti A, Grasso M, Staiano G, et al. (2015) The impact of process parameters on mechanical properties of parts fabricated in PLA with an open-source 3-D printer. Rapid Prototyp J 21: 604-617.
  • 4. Onwubolu GC, Rayegani F (2014) Characterization and optimization of mechanical properties of ABS parts manufactured by the fused deposition modelling process. Int J Manuf Eng 2014: 598531.
  • 5. Domingo-Espin M, Puigoriol-Forcada JM, Garcia-Granada AA, et al. (2015) Mechanical property characterization and simulation of fused deposition modeling polycarbonate parts. Mater Des 83: 670-677.    
  • 6. Popescu D, Zapciu A, Amza C, et al. (2018) FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: A review. Polym Test 69: 157-166.    
  • 7. Rankouhi B, Javadpour S, Delfanian F, et al. (2016) Failure analysis and mechanical characterization of 3D printed ABS with respect to layer thickness and orientation. J Fail Anal Prev 16: 467-481.
  • 8. Li H, Wang T, Sun J, et al. (2018) The effect of process parameters in fused deposition modelling on bonding degree and mechanical properties. Rapid Prototyp J 24: 80-92.    
  • 9. Liu X, Zhang M, Li S, et al. (2017) Mechanical property parametric appraisal of fused deposition modeling parts based on the gray Taguchi method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89: 2387-2397.
  • 10. Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL (2015) Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects. Adv Manuf 3: 42-53.
  • 11. Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2010) Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts. Mater Des 31: 287-295.    
  • 12. Chacón JM, Caminero MA, García-Plaza E, et al. (2017) Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection. Mater Des 124: 143-157.    
  • 13. Tymrak BM, Kreiger M, Pearce JM (2014) Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater Des 58: 242-246.
  • 14. Fernandez-vicente M, Calle W, Ferrándiz S, et al. (2016) Effect of infill parameters on tensile mechanical behavior in desktop 3D printing. 3D Print Addit Manuf 3: 183-192.    
  • 15. Ziemian C, Sharma M, Ziemian S (2012) Anisotropic mechanical properties of ABS parts fabricated by fused deposition modelling, In: Gokcek M, Mechanical Engineering, Rijeka: TechOpen, 158-150.
  • 16. Tsouknidas A, Pantazopoulos M, Katsoulis I, et al. (2016) Impact absorption capacity of 3D-printed components fabricated by fused deposition modelling. Mater Des 102: 41-44.    
  • 17. Torres J, Cotelo J, Karl J, et al. (2015) Mechanical property optimization of FDM PLA in shear with multiple objectives. Jom 67: 1183-1193.    
  • 18. Ruhatiya C, Singh S, Goyal A, et al. (2020) Electrochemical performance enhancement of sodium-ion batteries fabricated with NaNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 cathodes using support vector regression-simplex algorithm approach. J Electrochem Energy Convers Storage. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044358.
  • 19. Camargo JC, Machado ÁR, Almeida EC, et al. (2019) Mechanical properties of PLA-graphene filament for FDM 3D printing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103: 2423-2443.    
  • 20. Aw Y, Yeoh C, Idris M, et al. (2018) Effect of printing parameters on tensile, dynamic mechanical, and thermoelectric properties of FDM 3D printed CABS/ZnO composites. Materials 11: 466.    
  • 21. ASTM C (1997) Standard test method for flexural toughness and first-crack strength of fiber-reinforced concrete (using beam with third-point loading). C-1018.
  • 22. Di Landro L, Sala G, Olivieri D (2002) Deformation mechanisms and energy absorption of polystyrene foams for protective helmets. Polym Test 21: 217-228.    
  • 23. Ramnath BV, Jeykrishnan J, Elanchezhian C, et al. (2017) Investigation of flexural behaviour of polymer composite golf shaft. Mater Today Proc 4: 9341-9345.    
  • 24. Grasso M, Azzouz L, Ruiz-Hincapie P, et al. (2018) Effect of temperature on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PLA tensile specimens. Rapid Prototyp J 24: 1337-1346.    
  • 25. Alaboodi AS, Sivasankaran S (2018) Experimental design and investigation on the mechanical behavior of novel 3D printed biocompatibility polycarbonate scaffolds for medical applications. J Manuf Process 35: 479-491.    

 

This article has been cited by

  • 1. Bandar Aloyaydi, Subbarayan Sivasankaran, Ammar Mustafa, Investigation of infill-patterns on mechanical response of 3D printed poly-lactic-acid, Polymer Testing, 2020, 106557, 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106557
  • 2. Albert Forés-Garriga, Marco A. Pérez, Giovanni Gómez-Gras, Guillermo Reyes-Pozo, Role of infill parameters on the mechanical performance and weight reduction of PEI Ultem processed by FFF, Materials & Design, 2020, 108810, 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108810

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved