Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Meso-scale computational investigation of polyurea microstructure and its role in shockwave attenuation/dispersion

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson SC 29634, USA

In a number of recently published studies, it was demonstrated that polyurea possesses a high shockwave-mitigation capacity, i.e. an ability to attenuate and disperse shocks. Polyurea is a segmented thermoplastic elastomer which possesses a meso-scale segregated microstructure consisting of (high glass-transition temperature, Tg) hydrogen-bonded discrete hard domains and a (low Tg) contiguous soft matrix. Details of the polyurea microstructure (such as the extent of meso-segregation, morphology and the degree of short-range order and crystallinity within the hard domains) are all sensitive functions of the polyurea chemistry and its synthesis route. It has been widely accepted that the shockwave-mitigation capacity of polyurea is closely related to its meso-phase microstructure. However, it is not presently clear what microstructure-dependent phenomena and processes are responsible for the superior shockwave-mitigation capacity of this material. To help identify these phenomena and processes, meso-scale coarse-grained simulations of the formation of meso-segregated microstructure and its interaction with the shockwave is analyzed in the present work. It is found that shockwave-induced hard-domain densification makes an important contribution to the superior shockwave-mitigation capacity of polyurea, and that the extent of densification is a sensitive function of the polyurea soft-segment molecular weight. Specifically, the ability of release waves to capture and neutralize shockwaves has been found to depend strongly on the extent of shockwave-induced hard-domain densification.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

References

1. Grujicic M, Snipes JS, Ramaswami S, et al. (2013) Coarse-Grained Molecular-Level Analysis of Polyurea Properties and Shockwave-Mitigation Potential. J Mater Eng Perform 22: 1964-1981.    

2. Castagna AM, Pangon A, Choi T, et al. (2012) The role of soft segment molecular weight on microphase separation and dynamics of bulk polymerized polyureas. Macromol 45: 8438-8444.    

3. Grujicic M, Bell WC, Pandurangan B, et al. (2011) Fluid/structure interaction computational investigation of the blast-wave mitigation efficacy of the advanced combat helmet. J Mater Eng Perform 20: 877-893.    

4. Grujicic A, LaBerge M, Grujicic M, et al. (2012) Potential Improvements in Shockwave-Mitigation Efficacy of A Polyurea-Augmented Advanced Combat Helmet: A Computational Investigation. J Mater Eng Perform 21: 1562-1579.    

5. Grujicic M, Bell WC, Pandurangan B, et al. (2010) Blast-wave Impact-Mitigation Capability of Polyurea When Used as Helmet Suspension Pad Material. Mater Des 31: 4050-4065.    

6. Grujicic M, Arakere A, Pandurangan B, et al. (2012) Computational Investigation of Shockwave-Mitigation Efficacy of Polyurea when used in a Combat Helmet: A Core Sample Analysis. Multidisc Model Mater Struc 8: 297-331.    

7. Bogoslovov RB, Roland CM, Gamache RM (2007) Impact-induced glass-transition in elastomeric coatings. App Phys Let 90: 221910.    

8. Grujicic M, Pandurangan B, He T, et al. (2010) Computational Investigation of Impact Energy Absorption Capability of Polyurea Coatings via Deformation-Induced Glass Transition. Mater Sci Eng A 527: 7741-7751.    

9. Grujicic M, Pandurangan B, King AE, et al. (2011) Multi-length scale modeling and analysis of microstructure evolution and mechanical properties in polyurea. J Mater Sci 46: 1767-1779.    

10. Grujicic M, He T, Pandurangan B (2011) Development and parameterization of an equilibrium material model for segmented polyurea. Multidisc Model Mater Struc 7: 96-114.    

11. Grujicic M, He T, Pandurangan B, et al. (2011) Development and Parameterization of a Time-Invariant (Equilibrium) Material Model for Segmented Elastomeric Polyureas. J Mater: Des Appl 225: 182-194.

12. Grujicic M, He T, Pandurangan B, et al. (2011) Experimental characterization and material-model development for microphase-segregated polyurea : an overview J Mater Eng Perform 21: 2-16.

13. Grujicic M, Pandurangan B, Bell WC, et al. (2011) Molecular-level simulations of shockwave generation and propagation in polyurea. Mater Sci Eng A 528: 3799-3808.    

14. Grujicic M, Yavari R, Snipes JS, et al. (2012) Molecular-Level Computational Investigation of Shockwave Mitigation Capability of Polyurea. J Mater Sci 47: 8197-8215.    

15. Grujicic M, d’Entremont BP, Pandurangan B, et al. (2012) Concept-Level Analysis and Design of Polyurea for Enhanced Blast-Mitigation Performance. J Mater Eng Perform 21: 2024-2037.    

16. Grujicic M, Pandurangan B (2012) Meso-Scale Analysis of Segmental Dynamics in Micro-phase Segregated Polyurea. J Mater Sci 47: 3876-3889.    

17. Grujicic M, Ramaswami S, Snipes JS, et al. (2014) Multi-scale computation-based design of nano-segregated polyurea for maximum shockwave-mitigation performance. AIMS Mater Sci 1: 15-27.    

18. Amorphous Cell Datasheet. Accelrys, Inc., 2014. Available from: http://accelrys.com/products/datasheets/amorphous-cell.pdf.

19. Sun H (1998) COMPASS: An ab-initio Force-Field Optimized for Condensed-Phase Applications-Overview with Details on Alkane and Benzene Compounds. J Phys Chem B 102: 7338.    

20. Sun H, Ren P, Fried JR. (1998) The Compass Force-field: Parameterization and Validation for Phosphazenes. Comput Theor Polym Sci 8: 229-246.    

21. Grujicic M, Snipes JS, Ramaswami S, et al. (2014) Meso-Scale Computational Investigation of Shock-Wave Attenuation by Trailing Release-Wave in Different Grades of Polyurea. J Mater Eng Perf 23: 49-64.    

22. Grujicic M, Yavari R, Snipes JS, et al. (2014) All-Atom Molecular-Level Computational Simulations of Planar Longitudinal Shockwave Interactions with Polyurea, Soda-Lime Glass and Polyurea/Glass Interfaces. Multidisc Model Mater Struc 10: 474-510.    

23. Grujicic M, Yavari R, Snipes JS, et al. (2014) All-Atom Molecular-Level Computational Analyses of Polyurea/Fused-Silica Interfacial Decohesion Caused by Impinging Tensile Stress-Waves. Int J Struct Integr 5: 339-367.    

24. Discover Datasheet. Accelrys, Inc. (2014) Available from: http://accelrys.com/products/datasheets/discover.pdf.

25. Amirkhizi AV, Isaacs J, McGee J, et al. (2006) An experimentally-based viscoelastic constitutive model for polyurea, including pressure and temperature effects. Phil Mag 86: 5847-5866.    

26. Arman B, Reddy AS, Arya G (2012) Viscoelastic properties and shockwave response of coarse-grained models of multi-block versus di-block co-polymers: insights into dissipative properties of polyurea. Macromol 45: 3247-3255.    

27. Davison L (2008) Fundamentals of Shockwave Wave Propagation in Solids, Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

28. Grujicic M, d’Entremont BP, Pandurangan B, et al. (2012) A Study of the Blast-induced Brain White-Matter Damage and the Associated Diffuse Axonal Injury. Multidisc Model Mater Struc 8: 213-245.    

29. Grujicic M, Pandurangan B, Bell WC, et al. (2011) Application of a Dynamic-mixture Shockwave Model to the Metal-matrix Composite Materials. Mater Sci Eng A 528: 8187-8197.    

30. Grujicic M, Bell WC, Pandurangan B, et al. (2011) Computational Investigation of Structured Shocks in Al/SiC-particulates Metal Matrix Composites. Multidisc Model Mater Struc 7: 469-497.    

31. Garrett JT, Runt J, Lin JS (2000) Microphase Separation of Segmented Poly (urethane urea) Block Copolymers. Macromol 33: 6353-6359.    

32. Garrett JT, Lin JS, Runt J (2002) Influence of Preparation Conditions on Microdomain Formation in Poly(urethane urea) Block Copolymers. Macromol 35: 161-168.    

33. Castagna AM, Pangon A, Dillon GP, et al. (2013) Effect of Thermal History on the Microstructure of a Poly(tetramethylene oxide)-Based Polyurea. Macromol 46: 6520-6527.    

34. Pangon A, Dillon GP and Runt J (2014) Influence of mixed soft segments on microphase separation of polyurea elastomers. Polymer 55: 1837-1844.    

35. He Y, Zhang X and Runt J (2014) The role of diisocyanate structure on microphase separation of solution polymerized polyureas. Polymer 55: 906-913.    

36. Choi T, Fragiadakis D, Roland C M, et al. (2012) Microstructure and Segmental Dynamics of Polyurea under Uniaxial Deformation. Macromol 45: 3581-3589.    

37. Roland CM, Fragiadakis D, Gamache RM (2010) Elastomer-steel laminate armor. Compos Struct 92: 1059-1064.    

38. Amini M R, Isaacs J, Nemat-Nasser S (2010) Investigation of effect of polyurea on response of steel plates to impulsive loads in direct pressure-pulse experiments. Mech Mater 42: 628-639.    

39. Cho H, Bartyczak S, Mock W Jr., et al. (2013) Dissipation and resilience of elastomeric segmented copolymers under extreme strain rates. Polymer 54: 5952-5964.    

40. Cho H, Rinaldi R and Boyce M C (2013) Constitutive modeling of the rate-dependent resilient and dissipative large deformation behavior of a segmented copolymer polyurea. Soft Matter 9: 6319-6330.    

41. Grujicic M, Yavari R, Snipes J S, et al. (2015) Improvements in the blast-mitigation performance of light-tactical-vehicle side-vent-channel solution using aluminum-foam core sandwich structures. J Adv Mech Eng 2: 22-55.

Copyright Info: © 2015, Mica Grujicic, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved