Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Potential ecological impacts of trace metals on aquatic biota within the Upper Little Tennessee River Basin, North Carolina

Department of Geosciences & Natural Resources, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC 28723, USA

Special Issues: Metal Contamination in the Environment

The Upper Little Tennessee River (ULTR) possesses one of the most diverse assemblages of aquatic biota in North America, including the endangered Appalachian elktoe mussel (Alasmidonta raveneliana). Populations of the Appalachian elktoe significantly declined along with other species following an extreme flood in 2004. This paper examines the potential role that four toxic trace metals (Cu, Cr, Ni, and Zn) played in the population declines. Dissolved and total-recoverable concentrations of Cr and Ni measured during three flood events were below USEPA and North Carolina freshwater guidelines for potential impacts on aquatic biota, respectively. In contrast, 58% of the samples exceeded NC guideline values for total-recoverable concentrations of Cu and Zn. In general, metal concentrations increased with increasing discharge and suspended sediment concentrations (SSC). These relationships, combined with sequential extraction data from sediments, suggest that most metals were transported in the particulate form and were not readily bioavailable. During individual events, metal concentrations for a given discharge were influenced by a “first flush” hysteresis effect. Rapid increases in metal concentrations during the early stages of an event appear to be related to the entrainment of fine sediment, including particulate Fe to which the metals are sorbed. Instantaneous metal loads calculated for nine tributaries to the ULTR, combined with previously collected data, suggest that the majority of the metals were derived from the erosion of sediment and particulate Fe from subsurface soil horizons developed in bedrock containing sulfidic layers. The erosion was particularly pronounced in tributary basins in poor to moderate ecological condition. While a fraction of the Cu may have been derived from Cu-based pesticides and was periodically elevated above guideline values in river waters, the data in total suggest that toxic trace metals were unlikely to play a major role in the decline of elktoe populations.
  Article Metrics

Keywords Trace metals; trace metal provenance; Appalachian elktoe; Little Tennessee River

Citation: Jerry R. Miller. Potential ecological impacts of trace metals on aquatic biota within the Upper Little Tennessee River Basin, North Carolina. AIMS Environmental Science, 2016, 3(3): 305-325. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2016.3.305


  • 1. North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, Franklin to Fontana Local Watershed Plan, Little Tennessee River Basin, Macon and Swain Counties, N.C., Preliminary Findings and Recommendations Report, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 2009. Available from: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwjxidatnJHMAhWDRyYKHY-nDHYQFggcMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2FPublicFolder%2FWork%2520With%2FWatershed%2520Planners%2FF2F_WAR%2520Combined_Phase%25202.pdf&usg=AFQjCNE3OZghlywnNV7_ENYxiczCBZjUjw.
  • 2. Miller JR, Mackin G (2013) Concentrations, sources, and potential ecological impacts of selected trace metals on aquatic biota within the Little Tennessee River Basin, North Carolina. Water Air Soil Pollut 224: 1613-1637.    
  • 3. MacDonald DD, Ingersoll CG, Berger TA (2000) Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 39: 20-31.
  • 4. Creed JT, Brockhoff CA, Martin TD, Determination of trace elements in waters and wastes by Inductively Coupled Plasma–Mass Spectrometry, Method 200.8, Revision 5.4 Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1994. Available from: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjKr_33nZHMAhVK4SYKHaY6ALQQFggcMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.epa.gov%2Fsites%2Fproduction%2Ffiles%2F2015-08%2Fdocuments%2Fmethod_200-8_rev_5-4_1994.pdf&usg=AFQjCNF3DPzgjzk14qmcJyIA-Z7TT50q3g&bvm=bv.119745492,d.eWE
  • 5. Guy HP (1977) Techniques of water-resources investigations of the United States Geological Survey. Chapter c1: Laboratory theory and methods for sediment analysis. 3rd ed, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C..
  • 6. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources—Division of Water Quality “Redbook”, Surface Waters and Wetlands Standards, NC Administrative Code 15A NCAC 02B.0100, .0200 and .0300, 2007. Available from: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiW1bGSpZHMAhWDRSYKHeB2CtUQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.piedmontnutrientsourcebook.org%2FAssetts%2FWatershed%2520Restoration%2F2007RedbookOnline.pdf&usg=AFQjCNFwVpPdiaCCIbLZ9fUSgnGq4WtOdQ.
  • 7. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (2000) Basin-wide Assessment Report-Little Tennessee River. Division of Water Quality, Raleigh, North Carolina, 83.
  • 8. Miller JR, Orbock Miller SM (2007) Contaminated Rivers: A Geomorphological-Geochemical Approach to Site Assessment and Remediation. In: Miller JR and Miller SMO Author. Springer Netherlands, 418.
  • 9. Horowitz AJ, Elrick KA, Smith JJ (2001) Annual suspended sediment and trace element fluxes in Mississippi, Columbia, Colorado, and Rio Grande drainage basins. Hydroll Proc 15: 1169-1207.    
  • 10. Nagorski SA, Moore JN, McKinnon TE (2003) Geochemical response to variable streamflow conditions in contaminated and uncontaminated streams. Water Resour Res 39: 1-13.
  • 11. Williams GP (1989) Sediment concentrations versus water discharge during single hydrologic events in rivers. J Hydrology 111: 89-106.    
  • 12. Oliver B (1973) Heavy metal levels of Ottawa and Rideau River sediment. Environ Sci Technol 7: 135-137.    
  • 13. Förstner U, Wittmann GTW (1979) Metal Pollution in the Aquatic Environment, In: Forstner U and Wittmann GTW Authors, 1st edn, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York.
  • 14. Horowitz AJ, Elrick KA (1988) Interpretation of bed sediment trace metal data: methods of dealing with the grain size effect. In: Lichtenberg JJ, Winter JA, Weber CC and Fradkin L, eds, Chemical and biological characterization of sludges, sediments, dredge spoils, and drilling muds. American Society for Testing and Materials, 114-128.
  • 15. Shaw S, Wels C, Robertso A, et al., Background characterization study of naturally occurring acid rock drainage in the Sangre De Cristo Mountains, Taos County, New Mexico. 6th ICARD, Cairns, Queensland, Australia, 605-616, 2003. Available from: https://www.rgc.ca/files/publications/icard03back.pdf.
  • 16. Kwong YTJ, Whitley G, Roach P (2009) Natural acid rock drainage associated with black shales in the Yukon Territory, Canada. Appl Geochem 24: 221-231.    
  • 17. Nordstrom KD (2009) Acid rock drainage and climate change. J Geochem Explor 100: 97-104.    
  • 18. Huckabee JW, Goodyear CP, Jones RD (1975) Acid rock in the Great Smokies: unanticipated impact on aquatic biota of road construction in regions of sulfide mineralization. T Am Fish Soc 104: 677-684.
  • 19. Tarvainen T, Lahermo P, Mannio J (1993) Sources of trace metals in streams and headwater lakes in Finland. Water Air Soil Pollut 94: 1-32.
  • 20. Kim KW, Thornton I (1993) Influence of uraniferous black shales on cadmium, molybdenum and selenium in soils and crop plants in the Deog-Pyong area of Korea. Environ Geochem Health 15: 119-133.    
  • 21. Pasava J, Graves MC, MacInnis IN, et al. (1995) Black slates—A source of acid drainage at the Halifax International Airport, Nova Scotia, Canada. In: Mineral Deposits: From their Origin to their Environmental Impacts. Proceedings of the Third Biennial SGA Meeting, Prague, Czech Republic, 785-788.
  • 22. Peng B, Wu FC, Xiao ML, et al. (2005) Resource function and environment effects of black shales. Bull Mineral Geochem 24: 3-158.
  • 23. Zantilli M, Fox D (1997) Geology and mineralogy of the Meguma Group and their importance to environmental problems in Nova Scotia. Atlantic Geology 33: 81-85.
  • 24. Guilcher M (1987) Acid mine drainage in reactive slates “the Halifax Airport case”. Proceedings, Acid Mine Drainage Seminar/Workshop, Halifax, Nova Scotia, March 23-26, 1987. Environment Canada, 165-187.
  • 25. King M, Hart W (1987) Contribution of acidity and heavy metals to surface and groundwater by pyritiferous slates in the vicinity of the Halifax Airport. Report prepared for Environment Canada, Department of Supply and Services Contract: KE201-6-0103/01-SC, 98.
  • 26. Wargon J (1987) Acid mine drainage in reactive slates, “The Halifax International Airport Case”. Transport Canada Perspective. In: Proceedings, Acid Mine Drainage Seminar/Workshop, March 23-26, 1987, Halifax Nova Scotia, Environment Canada, 127-135.
  • 27. North Carolina Geological Survey (1985) Acidic Rocks in the Little Tennessee River Basin. Available from: http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/Sulfide%20rocks/acidicrocks.htm.
  • 28. Neff KJ, Schwartz JS, Moore SE, et al. (2013) Influence of basin characteristics on baseflow and stormflow chemistry in the Great Smoky Mountains National Parks, USA. Hydrol Process 27: 2061-2074.    
  • 29. Neff KJ, Schwartz JS, Moore SE, et al. (2012) Influence of basin characteristics on baseflow and stormflow chemistry in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA, Hydrological Processes, wileyonlinelibrary.com, DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9366.
  • 30. Schwartz JS, Cai M, Kulp MA, et al., Local effects of stream water quality on aquatic macroinvertebrates and fish communities within Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Natural Resources Report NPS/GRSM/NRR-2014/778. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado, 2014. Available from: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwip3Z_MppHMAhXB8CYKHcSUBHgQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Firmafiles.nps.gov%2Freference%2Fholding%2F490489&usg=AFQjCNE4Kkt_NfCJKLRXejCzr1wNOrKG4Q
  • 31. Cai M, Johnson AM, Schwartz JS, et al. (2012) Soil acid-base chemistry of a high-elevation forest watershed in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park: influence of acidic deposition. Water Air Soil Pollut 223: 289-303.    
  • 32. Kwong YTJ, Whitley WG (1993) Heavy metal attenuation in northern drainage systems. In: Prowse TD, Ommanney CSI, Ulmer KE, eds, Proceedings of the 9th International Northern Research Basin Symposium/Workshop, Canada 1992. National Hydrology Research Institute Symposium No. 10, Environment Canada, Saskatoon, 305-322.
  • 33. Kimball BA, Bianchi F, Walton-Day K, et al. (2007) Quantification of changes in metal loading from storm runoff, Merse River (Tuscany, Italy). Mine Water Environ 26: 209-216.    
  • 34. Hamilton DA, Mafic and Felsic Derived Soils in the Georgia Piedmont: Parent Material Uniformity, Reconstruction, and Trace Metal Contents. Master’s Thesis, University of Georgia, 57, 2002. Available from: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwj20_icqZHMAhUG5iYKHQ4LD8IQFggcMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fgetd.libs.uga.edu%2Fpdfs%2Fhamilton_dixie_a_200212_ms.pdf&usg=AFQjCNH_0_FKkbHbkSCxKqpCSjA0yo1Z2Q
  • 35. North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, Franklin to Fontana Local Watershed Plan, Little Tennessee River Basin, Macon and Swain Counties, N.C., Phase II. Watershed Assessment Report, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina, 2010. Available from: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwjxidatnJHMAhWDRyYKHY-nDHYQFggcMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2FPublicFolder%2FWork%2520With%2FWatershed%2520Planners%2FF2F_WAR%2520Combined_Phase%25202.pdf&usg=AFQjCNE3OZghlywnNV7_ENYxiczCBZjUjw.
  • 36. Leigh DS, Webb PA (2006) Holocene erosion, sedimentation, and stratigraphy at Raven Fork, Southern Blue Ridge Mountains, USA. Geomorphology 78: 161-177.    
  • 37. Leigh DS (2010) Morphology and channel evolution of small streams in the southern Blue Ridge Mountains of western North Carolina. Southeastern Geographer 50: 397-421.


This article has been cited by

  • 1. M.L. Rodríguez-Blanco, F. Soto-Varela, M.M. Taboada-Castro, M.T. Taboada-Castro, Using hysteresis analysis to infer controls on sediment-associated and dissolved metals transport in a small humid temperate catchment, Journal of Hydrology, 2018, 565, 49, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.030

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

Copyright Info: 2016, Jerry R. Miller, licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved