Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Stormwater management the American way: why no policy transfer?

Dept. of Politics, University of Liverpool, Roxby Building, Liverpool, UK

Special Issues: Urban Greening for Low Carbon Cities

From the 1940s until the 1980s the federal government gradually extended its authority over the structure of the American stormwater management system. The goal was to improve the water quality of the nation’s waterways by regulating the pollution loads entering the system, primarily through the use of gray infrastructure. However during the1980s the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) began to explore new approaches toward the regulation of stormwater pollution. Instead of focusing only on gray mechanisms, the EPA began developing and promoting the use of low impact development (LID) techniques as an element municipal governments could use to achieve their total maxim daily load of pollutants allowable under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit system. In light of the incentive offered by the EPA for the use of LID in the management of stormwater, it should be expected to provide a perfect area to observe policy transfer between federal, state and local governments; but it does not. This article will establish why the EPA began promoting a green approach to stormwater management and why this has not led to a widespread transfer of best management practices in the ways the literatures associated with federalism and policy transfer would suggest.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

Keywords policy transfer; public policy; stormwater; federalism

Citation: David P. Dolowitz. Stormwater management the American way: why no policy transfer?. AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 2(3): 868-883. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.3.868

References

  • 1.Copeland C (2010) Clean Water Act. Washington DC: Congressional Research Service; ii.
  • 2.National Pollution Discharge Permit System. Washington DC: EPA, 2015. Available from:http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/npdes/stormwater/index.cfm
  • 3.Federal Water Pollution Control Act,Washington DC:US Senate. 2015. Available from:http://www.epw.senate.gov/water.pdf
  • 4.Department of Transportation, Washington DC. 2015. Available from:http://environment.fhwa.dot.gov/ecosystems/ultraurb/index.asp;http://water.epa.gov
  • 5.Fischman R (2005) Cooperative Federalism and Natural Resources Law. New York Univ Environ Law J 14: 182-188.
  • 6.US v. DARBY, 312 US 100 (1941). Available from: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/312/100
  • 7.Daniel v. Paul. 395 US 298 (1969); Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. US. 379 US 241 (1964); Perez v. US. 420 US 146 (1971); Wickard v. Filburn. 317 US 111 (1942). All available from: https://www.law.cornell.edu
  • 8.Welborn D (1988) Conjoint Federalism and Environmental Regulations in the US. Publius 18: 27-43.
  • 9.Xian G, Crane M, Su J (2007) An analysis of urban development and its environmental impact on the Tampa Bay watershed. J Environ Manage 85: 965-967.
  • 10.Gaffield S, Goo R, Richards L, et al. (2003) Public Health Effects of Inadequately Managed Stormwater Runoff: Am J Public Health 93: 1527-1533;
  • 11.Gilbert J, Clausen J (2006) Stormwater runoff quality and the quantity form asphalt, paver, and stone driveways in Connecticut. Water Res 40: 826-832.
  • 12.Dargie C (2004) Finding the Ways Through the Phase II Maze: Coastal Cold Weather MS4s and the EPA's New Stormwater Regulatory Program. Oceans Coastal Law J 10: 81-116.
  • 13.Alimo Water Softeners, Why is Water Quality Important?2012. Available from:http://alamowatersofteners.com/water-quality-important.
  • 14.Saegrov S, Saegrov J, Thorolfsson M. Urban Drainage in Cold Climates, UNESCO: Paris. 2000. Available from:http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001225/122599eo.pdf
  • 15.Hueiwang A, Englande A, Bakeer R, et al. (2005) Impact of urban stormwater runoff on estuarine environmental quality.Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 63: 513-526.
  • 16.Ostrander M, Loving the Puget Sound to death; The Nation. 2015. Available from:http://www.thenation.com/article/loving-puget-sound-death.
  • 17.Digest of Federal Resource Laws of Interest to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act), Federal Register: Washington DC. 2012. Available from:http://www.fws.gov/laws/lawsdigest/FWATRPO.HTML
  • 18.White S, Boswell M (2006) Planning for Water Quality. J Environ Plann Man 49: 141-160.
  • 19.EPA: Washington DC. 2015. Available from:http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/nps/whatis.cfm
  • 20.EPA (2000) National Water Quality Inventory Report (EPA-841-R-02-001), Washington, DC: USEPA Office of Water; EPA (2002), Water Quality Conditions in the United States (EPA-841-F-02-003), Washington, DC: USEPA Office of Water.
  • 21.EPA. MPDES Home. Washington DC: EPA. 2014. Available from:http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/index.cfm.
  • 22.USEPA. Combined Sewer Overflows, EPA 832-B-95-003. 1995. Available from: http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyNET.exe/200041XP.TXT?ZyActionD=ZyDocument&Client=EPA&Index=1995+Thru+1999&Docs=&Query=&Time=&EndTime=&SearchMethod=1&TocRestrict=n&Toc=&TocEntry=&QField=&QFieldYear=&QFieldMonth=&QFieldDay=&IntQFieldOp=0&ExtQFieldOp=0&XmlQuery=&File=D%3A%5Czyfiles%5CIndex%20Data%5C95thru99%5CTxt%5C00000002%5C200041XP.txt&User=ANONYMOUS&Password=anonymous&SortMethod=h%7C-&MaximumDocuments=1&FuzzyDegree=0&ImageQuality=r75g8/r75g8/x150y150g16/i425&Display=p%7Cf&DefSeekPage=x&SearchBack=ZyActionL&Back=ZyActionS&BackDesc=Results%20page&MaximumPages=1&ZyEntry=1&SeekPage=x&ZyPURL
  • 23.Lower Towamensing, Stormwater Management MS4 Permit. Carbon County Pennsylvania: Township Supervisors. 2015. Available from:http://www.lowertowtwp.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=78&Itemid=56
  • 24.Denzin B, Local Water Policy Innovation. Madison, Wisconsin: American Rivers & Midwest Environmental Advocates. 2008. Available from:http://water.epa.gov/infrastructure/greeninfrastructure/upload/gi_localwaterinnovation.pdf
  • 25.Kloss C, Calarusse C (2008) Rooftops to Rivers. New York: National Resource Defense Council; 8.
  • 26.EPA, Smart Growth. Washington DC: EPA. 2012. Available from:http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth
  • 27.Tufte E, The cognitive style of PowerPoint. 2011. Available from:http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/powerpoint
  • 28.Norvig P (2004) PowerPoint: shot with its own bullets. Lancet 362: 343-344;
  • 29.Pidwirny M, Jones Scott. The Natural Spheres: The Hydrologic Cycle. British Columbia: PhysicalGeograpyh.Net. 2012. Available fromhttp://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/5c_1.html
  • 30.McKendrick J, Is PowerPoint dumbing down our decisions? 2010. Available fromhttp://www.smartplanet.com/business/blog/business-brains/is-powerpoint-dumbing-downour-decisions/1709
  • 31.Sears DO, Freedman JL (1967) Selective exposure to information: A critical review. Public Opin Q 31: 194-213.
  • 32.Rogers E (2003) Diffusion of Innovations. 5th rev. ed. New York: Free Press.

 

This article has been cited by

  • 1. Mary Thornbush, Urban greening for low carbon cities—introduction to the special issue, AIMS Environmental Science, 2016, 3, 1, 133, 10.3934/environsci.2016.1.133
  • 2. Grace Tjandraatmadja, , Approaches to Water Sensitive Urban Design, 2019, 87, 10.1016/B978-0-12-812843-5.00005-8
  • 3. Barbara Beckingham, Timothy Callahan, Vijay Vulava, Stormwater Ponds in the Southeastern U.S. Coastal Plain: Hydrogeology, Contaminant Fate, and the Need for a Social-Ecological Framework, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2019, 7, 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00117

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

Copyright Info: 2015, David P. Dolowitz, licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved