Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Performance analysis of a smart meter node for congestion avoidance and LoS coverage

Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, National Institute of Technology Karnataka(NITK)-Surathkal Mangalore-575025

Topical Section: Smart Grids and Networks

Smart meters are intelligent next-generation energy meters which are used for measuring energy consumption and transmitting information over a network. In a real-time environment, a smart meter network faces congestion and coverage issues. To connect to the network, a network interface card (NIC) is installed for each smart meter. NICs are hardware components that link a host to a network and acts as both the physical and data link layer. Generally, a single node is connected to a NIC. We found that the use of multiple NICs in a node shows significant improvement over the use of a single NIC to overcome network congestion in a real-time environment. The line of sight (LoS) between the transmitter and the receiver is a coverage issue in a smart meter network, which leads to an increase in the packet loss ratio (PLR). In this work, we address network congestion and the coverage issue through multi-channel capability and maximum LoS with single-and multi-hop nodes respectively. The proposed multi-channel network shows two times improvement in the throughput over the regular system; with additional hardware and approximately 1.5 times lower PLR for Node. The experimental results suggest that for a single-hop node, approximately 30 m is the average distance over which LoS communication is possible, and for multi-hop nodes, the distance is 24 m.
  Article Metrics


1. Royer EM, Toh CK (1999) A review of current routing protocols for ad hoc mobile wireless networks. IEEE Pers Commun 6: 46–55.    

2. Taneja S, Kush A (2010) A survey of routing protocols in mobile ad hoc networks. Int J Innov Manag Technol 1: 279–85.

3. Kaabi F, Ghannay S, Filali F (2010) Channel allocation and routing in wireless mesh networks: A survey and qualitative comparison between schemes. Int J Wirel Mob Netw 2: 132–151.

4. Ghannay S, Gammar SM, Filali F, et al. (2012) Multi-radio multi-channel routing metrics in IEEE 802.11s based wireless mesh networks. Ann Telecommun 67: 215–226.

5. Khalifa T, Naik K, Nayak A (2011) A survey of communication protocols for automatic meter reading applications. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 13: 168–182.    

6. Selvam C, Srinivas K. Ayyappan GS, et al. (2012) Advanced metering infrastructure for smart grid applications. 2012 International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Technology 145–150.

7. Bouhafs F, Mackay M, & Merabti M (2014) Communication Challanges and Solutions in the Smart Grid.Springer.

8. Jain K, Padhye J, Padmanabhan VN, et al. (2005) Impact of interference on multi-hop wireless network performance. Wireless Networks 11: 471–487.    

9. Kulkarni P, Gormus S, Fan Z, et al. (2012) AMI Mesh Networks-A practical solution and its performance evaluation. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 3: 1469–1481.    

10. Tang J, Xue G, Zhang W (2006) Maximum throughput and fair bandwidth allocation in multi-channel wireless mesh networks. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications 2006.

11. Fuada S, Putra AP, Adiono T (2017) Analysis of Received Power Characteristics of Commercial Photodiodes in Indoor Los Channel Visible Light Communication. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 8: 164–172.

12. Sachdeva N, Sharma D (2012) Diversity : A Fading Reduction Technique. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci Software Eng 2: 58–61.

13. Srirangarajan S, Tewfik AH (2005) Localization in wireless sensor networks under non line-of-sight propagation. GLOBECOM - IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference 6: 3477–3481.

14. Ramkumar D, Annadurai C, Nirmaladevi K (2017) Continuous authentication consoles in mobile ad hoc network (MANET). Cluster Comput 1–10.

15. Borkar GM, Mahajan AR (2017) A secure and trust based on-demand multipath routing scheme for self-organized mobile ad-hoc networks. Wireless Networks 23: 2455–2472.    

16. Tsado Y, Gamage K, Lund D (2015) Performance Evaluation of Wireless Mesh Network Routing Protocols for Smart Grid AMI Networks. Proceedings of IEICE Information and Communication Technology Forum 2015.

17. Anand M, Sasikala T (2018) Efficient energy optimization in mobile ad hoc network (MANET) using better-quality AODV protocol. Cluster Comput 1–7.

18. Reineri M, Casetti C, Chiasserini CF (2009) Routing protocols for mesh networks with mobility support. 2009 6th International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems 71–75.

19. Sanchez-Iborra R, Cano MD, Garcia-Haro J (2014) Performance evaluation of BATMAN routing protocol for VoIP services: A QoE perspective. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun 13: 4947–4958.    

20. Zhan H, Zhou Y (2008) Comparison and analysis AODV and OLSR routing protocols in ad hoc network. 2008 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing 1–4.

21. Hanzo L, Tafazolli R (2007) A survey of QoS routing solutions for mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 9: 50–70.

22. So, J., & Vaidya, N. H. (2005, August). Routing and channel assignment in multi-channel multi-hop wireless networks with single network interface. In The second international conference on quality of service in heterogeneous wired/wireless networks (QShine).

© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved