AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(3): 414-435. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.3.414.

Research article

Export file:

Format

• RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
• BibTex
• Text

Content

• Citation Only
• Citation and Abstract

The probabilistic load flow analysis by considering uncertainty with correlated loads and photovoltaic generation using Copula theory

1 School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, P.R. China
2 Department of Electrical Engineering, The Superior University Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
3 Department of Electrical Engineering, Government College University Faisalabad Sahiwal Campus, Sahiwal 57000, Pakistan

## Abstract    Full Text(HTML)    Figure/Table    Related pages

In this paper, a probabilistic load flow analysis is proposed in order to deal with probabilistic problems related to the power system. Due to increasing trend of penetration of renewable energy sources in power system brought two factors: One is uncertainty, and another one is dependence. Uncertainty and dependence factor increase risk associated with power system operation and planning. In this proposed model these two factors is considered. Gaussian Copula theory is proposed to establish the probability distribution of correlated input random variables. Three sampling methods are used with Monte Carlo simulation as simple random sampling, Box-Muller sampling, and Latin hypercube sampling in order to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed method. The main advantages of this model are as: It can establish any type of correlation between input random variable with the help of Copula theory, it is free from the restrictions of Pearson coefficient of correlation, it is unconstrained by the marginal distribution of input random variables, and uncertainty is established with photovoltaic generation this is the main source of uncertainty. Additional, in order to evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed model a real load and photovoltaic generation data is adopted. For accuracy evaluation purpose two comparative test system is adopted as modified IEEE 14 and IEEE 118-bus test system.
Figure/Table
Supplementary
Article Metrics

Citation: Li Bin, Muhammad Shahzad, Qi Bing, Muhammad Ahsan, Muhammad U Shoukat, Hafiz MA Khan, Nabeel AM Fahal. The probabilistic load flow analysis by considering uncertainty with correlated loads and photovoltaic generation using Copula theory. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(3): 414-435. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.3.414

References

• 1. Bechrakis DA, Sparis PD (2004) Correlation of wind speed between neighboring measuring stations. IEEE T Energy Conver 19: 400–406.
• 2. Villanueva D, Feijóo A, Pazos JL (2010) Correlation between power generated by wind turbines from different locations. Available from: http://proceedings.ewea.org/ewec2010/allfiles2/20_EWEC2010presentation.pdf.
• 3. Jong MD, Papaefthymiou G, Palensky P (2017) A framework for incorporation of infeed uncertainty in power system risk-based security assessment. IEEE T Power Syst 33: 613–621.
• 4. Kirschen D, Jayaweera D (2007) Comparison of risk-based and deterministic security assessments. IET Gener Transm Dis 1: 527–533.
• 5. Zhang P, Lee ST (2004) Probabilistic load flow computation using the method of combined cumulants and Gram-Charlier expansion. IEEE T Power Syst 19: 676–682.
• 6. Nijhuis M, Gibescu M, Cobben S (2017) Gaussian mixture based probabilistic load flow for LV-network planning. IEEE T Power Syst 32: 2878–2886.
• 7. Valverde G, Saric A, Terzija V (2012) Probabilistic load flow with non-Gaussian correlated random variables using Gaussian mixture models. IET Gener Transm Dis 6: 701–709.
• 8. Prusty BR, Jena D (2016) Combined cumulant and Gaussian mixture approximation for correlated probabilistic load flow studies: A new approach. Csee J Power Energ Syst 2: 71–78.
• 9. Caramia P, Carpinelli G, Varilone P (2010) Point estimate schemes for probabilistic three-phase load flow. Electr Pow Syst Res 80: 168–175.
• 10. Morales JM, Perez-Ruiz J (2007) Point estimate schemes to solve the probabilistic power flow. IEEE T Power Syst 22: 1594–1601.
• 11. Kloubert ML, Rehtanz C (2017) Enhancement to the combination of point estimate method and Gram-Charlier Expansion method for probabilistic load flow computations. PowerTech, IEEE Manchester 2017: 1–6.
• 12. Wang Y, Zhang N, Chen Q, et al. (2016) Dependent discrete convolution based probabilistic load flow for the active distribution system. IEEE T Sustain Energ 8: 1000–1009.
• 13. Zhang N, Kang C, Singh C, et al. (2016) Copula based dependent discrete convolution for power system uncertainty analysis. IEEE T Power Syst 31: 5204–5205.
• 14. Cai D, Chen J, Shi D, et al. (2012) Enhancements to the cumulant method for probabilistic load flow studies. Pow Energ Soc Gen Meeting 59: 1–8.
• 15. Aien M, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Aminifar F (2012) Probabilistic load flow in correlated uncertain environment using unscented transformation. IEEE T Power Syst 27: 2233–2241.
• 16. Fang S, Cheng H, Xu G (2016) A modified Nataf transformation-based extended quasi-monte carlo simulation method for solving probabilistic load flow. Electr Mach Pow Syst 44: 1735–1744.
• 17. Ren Z, Koh CS (2013) A second-order design sensitivity-assisted Monte Carlo simulation method for reliability evaluation of the electromagnetic devices. J Electr Eng Technol 8: 780–786.
• 18. Tang L, Wen F, Salam MA, et al. (2015) Transmission system planning considering integration of renewable energy resources. Pow Energ Eng Conf 2015: 1–5.
• 19. Ayodele TR (2016) Analysis of monte carlo simulation sampling techniques on small signal stability of wind generator-connected power system. J Eng Sci Technol 11: 563–583.
• 20. Prusty BR, Jena D (2017) A critical review on probabilistic load flow studies in uncertainty constrained power systems with photovoltaic generation and a new approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 69: 1286–1302.
• 21. Morales JM, Baringo L, Conejo AJ, et al. (2010) Probabilistic power flow with correlated wind sources. Let Gener Transm Dis 4: 641–651.
• 22. Usaola J (2010) Probabilistic load flow with correlated wind power injections. Electr Pow Syst Res 80: 528–536.
• 23. Gupta N (2016) Probabilistic load flow with detailed wind generator models considering correlated wind generation and correlated loads. Renew Energ 94: 96–105.
• 24. Prusty BR, Jena D (2017) A sensitivity matrix-based temperature-augmented probabilistic load flow study. IEEE T Ind Appl 53: 2506–2516.
• 25. Kenari MT, Sepasian MS, Nazar MS, et al. (2017) The combined cumulants and Laplace transform method for probabilistic load flow analysis. Let Gener Transm Dis.
• 26. Wu W, Wang K, Li G, et al. (2016) Probabilistic load flow calculation using cumulants and multiple integrals. Let Gener Transm Dis 10: 1703–1709.
• 27. Nelsen RB (2007) An introduction to copulas. Springer Science & Business Media.
• 28. Market Analysis and Information System (MAISY). Utility Customer Energy Use & Hourly Load Databases. Available from: http://www.maisy.com/.
• 29. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Obtain Solar Power data: Western State California. Available from: https://www.nrel.gov/grid/solar-power-data.html.
• 30. Macdonald IA (2009) Comparison of sampling techniques on the performance of Monte-Carlo based sensitivity analysis. Eleventh International IBPSA Conference, 992–999.
• 31. Yu H, Chung CY, Wong KP, et al. (2009) Probabilistic load flow evaluation with hybrid latin hypercube sampling and cholesky decomposition. IEEE T Power Syst 24: 661–667.
• 32. University of Washington Electrical Engineering: Power System Test Case Archive (January 2018). Available from: http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/pstca.
• 33. Karaki S, Chedid R, Ramadan R (1999) Probabilistic performance assessment of autonomous solar-wind energy conversion systems. IEEE T Energy Conver 14: 766–772.
• 34. Reddy JB, Reddy DN (2004) Probabilistic performance assessment of a roof top wind, solar photo voltaic hybrid energy system. Rel Maint S-RAMS 2004: 654–658.