Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Product longevity and shared ownership: Sustainable routes to satisfying the world’s growing demand for goods 

1 University of Bath, Bath, UK;
2 University of Cambridge, Cambridge UK;
3 Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK

Special Issues: Advances in Energy and Sustainable Development

It has been estimated that by 2030 the number of people who are wealthy enough to be significant consumers will have tripled. This will have a dramatic impact on the demands for primary materials and energy. It has been estimated that with improvements in design and manufacturing it is possible to maintain the current level of production using 70% of the current primary material consumed. Even with these improvements on the production side, there will still be a doubling of primary material requirements by the end of the century, with accompanying rises in industrial energy demand, if the rise in demand for goods and services is to be met. It is therefore clear that the consumption of products must also be explored. Product longevity and using goods more intensively are two strategies which could reduce the demand for new goods. If products last longer, then manufacturing output can concentrate on emerging markets rather than the market for replacement goods. There are many goods which are infrequently used, these seldom wear out. The total demand for such could be drastically reduced if they were shared with other people. Sharing of goods has traditionally been conducted between friends or by hiring equipment, but modern communication systems and social media could increase the opportunities to share goods. Sharing goods also increases access to a range of goods for those on low incomes. From a series of workshops it has been found that the principal challenges are sociological rather than technological. This paper contains a discussion of these challenges and explores possible futures where these two strategies have been adopted. In addition, the barriers and opportunities that these strategies offer for consumers and businesses are identified, and areas where government policy could be instigated to bring about change are highlighted.
  Article Metrics

Keywords industrial emissions limits; satisfying global demand for goods; product longevity; improved utilisation; barriers benefits & drivers

Citation: John G. Rogers, Samuel J.G. Cooper, Simone Cooper, Danielle Densley Tingley, Naomi Braithwaite, Mariale Moreno, Alex Rodrigues, and Giuseppe Salvia. Product longevity and shared ownership: Sustainable routes to satisfying the world’s growing demand for goods . AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(4): 547-561. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.4.547


  • 1. Kharas H (2010) The Emerging Middle Class In Developing Countries, OECD Global Development Outlook, Working Paper No. 285.
  • 2. UN, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its eighteenth session, held in Doha from 26 November to 8 December 2012, FCCC/CP/2012/8, 2012. Available from: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2012/cop18/eng/08.pdf Aug 2013
  • 3. International Energy Agency, Energy Technology Transitions for Industry—Strategies for the next industrial revolution , IEC/OECD 2009
  • 4. Dyer CH, Hammond GP, Jones CI, et al. (2008) Enabling technologies for industrial energy demand management. Energy Policy 36: 4434-4443.    
  • 5. Allwood JM, Ashby MF, Gutowski TG, et al. (2013) Material efficiency: providing material services with less material production, rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil Trans R Soc A 371: 20120496.    
  • 6. McKinsey & Company (2012) Resource Revolution: Meeting the worlds energy, material, food and water need. Available from: http:/www.mckinsey.com/insights/energy_resource_material/resource_revolution.
  • 7. Allwood JM, Cullen JM, Carruth MA, et al. (2014) Sustainable Materials with both Eyes Open, UTI Cambridge England.
  • 8. International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook 2013. Available from: www.worldenergyoutlook.org
  • 9. Leibling D (2008) Car ownership in Great Britain, Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring. Available from: http://www.racfoundation.org/assets/rac_foundation/content/downloadables/car%20ownership%20in%20great%20britain%20-%20leibling%20-%20171008%20-%20report.pdf (accessed Sept 2014).
  • 10. Nieuwenhuis P (2008) From banger to classic—a model for sustainable car consumption? Int J Consum Stud 32: 648-655.    
  • 11. Nieuwenhuis P (1994) The long life car: investigation a motor industry heresy, in Motor vehicles in the environment: principle and practice ed Nieuwenhuis P & Wells P, John Wiley and sons, Chichester.
  • 12. Smart Moves Ltd, London City Car Club Surveys Summary of Key Points, Report for The London City Car Club Consortium, 2004.
  • 13. Cooper T (2005) Slower consumption; reflections on product life spans and the ‘Throwaway Society'. J Ind Ecol 9: 51-67.    
  • 14. Goodall P, Rosamond E, Harding J (2014) A review of the state of the art in tools and techniques used to evaluate remanufacturing feasibility. J Clean Prod 81: 1-15    
  • 15. Ijomah W L,McMahon CA (2007) Hammond G P,Newman S T, Development of design for remanufacturing guidelines to support sustainable manufacturing Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 23: 712-719.
  • 16. Centre for remanufacturing and reuse web site. Available from: http://www.remanufacturing.org.uk/policy-sector.lasso (accessed Sept 2014).
  • 17. S Allen (2010) Drivers and barriers for remanufacturing of small- and medium-scale wind turbines, Centre for Remanufacturing and Reuse Product Group Study. Available from: http://www.remanufacturing.org.uk/pdf/story/.
  • 18. Rolls Royce web site. Available from: http://www.rolls-royce.com/sustainability/better_power/products/index.jsp (accessed Sept 2014).
  • 19. Densley Tingley D, Allwood JM (2014) Reuse of structural steel: the opportunities and challenges, presented at European steel environment & energycongress 2014, Teesside University, UK.
  • 20. Densley Tingley D Reducing Material Demand in Construction Indemand U A Prospectus, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.ukindemand.ac.uk/sector/construction Sept 2014.
  • 21. Hart GH (2007) A Good Business Move: Recycling Insulation Materials, Insulation Outlook.
  • 22. Foresight (2013) The Future of Manufacturing: A new era of opportunity and challenge for the UK Summary Report, The Government Office for Science, London.
  • 23. Deloitte Research (2006) The Service Revolution in Global Manufacturing Industries, A Deloitte Research Global Manufacturing Study. Available from: http://www.apec.org.au/docs/2011-11_training/deloitte2006.pdf (Accessed on Sept 2014).
  • 24. Visnjic I, Van Looy B (2011) Can a Product Manufacturer Become a Successful Service Provide r? In Pursuit of a Business Model that Fosters Complementarity between Product and Service Activities Perspectives, paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, San Antonio, USA. Available from: http://www.cambridgeservicealliance.org/uploads/downloadfiles/Can%20a%20Product%20Manufacturer%20be%20a%20Successful%20Service%20Provider.pdf (Accessed on Sept 2014).
  • 25. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Towards the circular economy vol.3: Accelerating the scale-up across global supply chains. Available from: http:// www.thecirculareconomy.org (Accessed on July 4, 2014).
  • 26. Benton D, Hazell J (2014) Wasted opportunities: Smarter systems for resource recovery. A report from the Circular Economy Task Force, Green Alliance, London. Available from: http://www.greenalliance.org.uk/wasted_opportunities:smarter_systems_for_resource_recovery.
  • 27. European Commission, COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. ‘Advancing Manufacturin—Advancing Europe’—Report of the Task Force on Advanced Manufacturing for Clean Production, Brussels, 19.3.2014, SWD Final 2014
  • 28. Wells P (2013) Sustainable business models and the automotive industry: A commentary. IIMB Manage Rev 25: 228-239    
  • 29. Williams A (2006) Product-service systems in the automotive industry: the case of micro-factory retailing. J Clean Prod 14: 172-184    
  • 30. UKINDEMAND report on event page web site, Industry seminar on optimizing product lifetimes. Available from: http://www.ukindemand.ac.uk/events/industry-seminar-optimising-product-lifetimes (accessed Sept 2014).
  • 31. Bjoern R, Nidhi A (2008) Qualitative research skills workshop—a facilitators reference manual, Produced by the Recoup consortium. Available from: htt\\ceid.educ.cam.ac.uk/Publications/RECOUP_Manual.pdf.
  • 32. ING Economics Department (2015) Rethinking finance in a circular economy. Available from: http://www.ing.com/About-us/Our-stories/Features/Circular-economy-challenges-financial-business-models.htm.
  • 33. McKinsey Center for Business and Environment (2015) Growth Within: A Circular Economy Vision For A Competitive Europe - a report produced for The Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Available from: http://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/dotcom/client_service/sustainability/2015%20circular%20growth%20report/growth_within-a_circular_economy_vision_for_a_competitive_europe%20(1).ashx.
  • 34. Cooper T, Braithwaite N, Moreno M, et al. (2015) Product Lifetimes And The Environment Conference Proceedings 17-19 June, 2015 - Nottingham, UK, ISBN 978-0-9576009-9-7 (ebk.)34.Available from: http://www.ntu.ac.uk/plate_conference/PLATE_2015_proceedings.pdf.
  • 35. OECD (2008) Measuring material flows and resource productivity Volume I. The OECD Guide. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/environment/indicators-modelling-outlooks/MFA-Guide.pdf.
  • 36. anon (2008) Material Intensity Of The Economy methodology sheet. Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/indicators/methodology_sheets/consumption_production/material_intensity.pdf.


This article has been cited by

  • 1. Samuel J.G. Cooper, Jannik Giesekam, Geoffrey P. Hammond, Jonathan B. Norman, Anne Owen, John G. Rogers, Kate Scott, Thermodynamic insights and assessment of the ‘circular economy’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 162, 1356, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.169
  • 2. Anders Haug, Defining ‘Resilient Design’ in the Context of Consumer Products, The Design Journal, 2017, 1, 10.1080/14606925.2018.1395265
  • 3. Ben Bridgens, Mark Powell, Graham Farmer, Claire Walsh, Eleanor Reed, Mohammed Royapoor, Peter Gosling, Jean Hall, Oliver Heidrich, Creative upcycling: reconnecting people, materials and place through making, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.317
  • 4. D. Lilley, B. Bridgens, A. Davies, A. Holstov, Ageing (dis)gracefully: Enabling designers to understand material change, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.304
  • 5. María Fernanda Godoy León, Jo Dewulf, Data quality assessment framework for critical raw materials. The case of cobalt, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020, 157, 104564, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104564

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

Copyright Info: 2015, John G. Rogers, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved