Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Single-particle based helical reconstruction—how to make the most of real and Fourier space

EMBL—European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Unit, Meyerhofstr. 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany

Special Issues: Structural analysis of macromolecules using Cryo electron microscopy

The helical assembly is a fundamental organization principle of biomacromolecules. To determine the structures of helical filaments or tubes has been helped by the fact that many different views of the helical unit are present to reconstruct a three-dimensional image from a single helix. In this review, I present the current state of helical image reconstruction from electron cryo-micrographs by introducing Fourier-based processing alongside real-space approaches. Based on this foundation, I describe how they can be applied to determine the symmetry and high-resolution structure of helical assemblies. In the past, the main structure determination approach of helical assemblies from electron micrographs was the Fourier-Bessel method, which is based on a comprehensive theory and has generated many successful applications in the last 40 years. The emergence of the single-particle technique allowed segmented helical specimens to be treated as single particles, thus rendering new specimens amenable to 3D helical reconstruction and facilitating high-resolution structure analysis. However, helical symmetry determination remains the crucial step for a successful 3D reconstruction. Depending on the helical specimen, Fourier and real-space approaches or a combination of both provide important clues to establish the correct helical symmetry. I discuss recent developments in combining traditional Fourier-Bessel procedures with single-particle algorithms to provide a versatile and comprehensive approach to structure determination of helical specimens. Upon introduction of direct electron detectors, a series of near-atomic resolution structures from helical assemblies have become available. As helical organization is fundamental to many structural assemblies of the cell, these approaches to structure elucidation open up promising capabilities to study the underlying structures at atomistic resolution.
  Article Metrics

Keywords Helical assemblies; Fourier Bessel reconstruction; layer lines; single-particle helical reconstruction; high-resolution electron cryo-microscopy; direct electron detectors

Citation: Carsten Sachse. Single-particle based helical reconstruction—how to make the most of real and Fourier space. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(2): 219-244. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.2.219


  • 1. De Rosier D, Klug A (1968) Reconstruction of Three Dimensional Structures from Electron Micrographs. Nature 217: 130-134.    
  • 2. Cochran W, Crick FHC, Vand V (1952) The Structure of Synthetic Polypeptides. I. The Transform of Atoms on a Helix. Acta Crystallographica 5: 581-586.
  • 3. Franklin RE, Klug A (1955) The splitting of layer lines in X-ray fibre diagrams of helical structures: application to tobacco mosaic virus. Acta Crystallographica 8: 777-780.    
  • 4. Franklin R, Holmes K (1958) Tobacco mosaic virus: application of the method of isomorphous replacement to the determination of the helical parameters and radial density distribution. Acta Crystallographica 11: 213-220.    
  • 5. Crowther RA, Amos LA, Finch JT, et al. (1970) Three dimensional reconstructions of spherical viruses by fourier synthesis from electron micrographs. Nature 226: 421-425.    
  • 6. Adrian M, Dubochet J, Lepault J, et al. (1984) Cryo-electron microscopy of viruses. Nature 308: 32-36.    
  • 7. Henderson R, Baldwin JM, Ceska TA, et al. (1990) Model for the structure of bacteriorhodopsin based on high-resolution electron cryo-microscopy. J Mol Biol 213: 899-929.    
  • 8. Miyazawa A, Fujiyoshi Y, Unwin N. (2003) Structure and gating mechanism of the acetylcholine receptor pore. Nature 423: 949-955.    
  • 9. Yonekura K, Maki-Yonekura S, Namba K (2003) Complete atomic model of the bacterial flagellar filament by electron cryomicroscopy. Nature 424: 643-650.    
  • 10. van Heel M, Frank J (1981) Use of multivariate statistics in analysing the images of biological macromolecules. Ultramicroscopy 6: 187-194.
  • 11. Penczek PA, Grassucci RA, Frank J (1994) The ribosome at improved resolution: new techniques for merging and orientation refinement in 3D cryo-electron microscopy of biological particles. Ultramicroscopy 53: 251-270.    
  • 12. Lawson CL, Baker ML, Best C, et al. (2011) EMDataBank.org: unified data resource for CryoEM. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D456-64.
  • 13. Sachse C, Chen JZ, Coureux P-D, et al. (2007) High-resolution electron microscopy of helical specimens: a fresh look at tobacco mosaic virus. J Mol Biol 371: 812-835.    
  • 14. Yu X, Jin L, Zhou ZH (2008) 3.88 A structure of cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus by cryo-electron microscopy. Nature 453: 415-419.
  • 15. Zhang X, Settembre E, Xu C, et al. (2008) Near-atomic resolution using electron cryomicroscopy and single-particle reconstruction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 1867-1872.    
  • 16. Cong Y, Baker ML, Jakana J, et al. (2010) 4.0-A resolution cryo-EM structure of the mammalian chaperonin TRiC/CCT reveals its unique subunit arrangement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 4967-4972.
  • 17. Bai X-C, Fernandez IS, McMullan G, et al. (2013) Ribosome structures to near-atomic resolution from thirty thousand cryo-EM particles. eLife 2: e00461.
  • 18. Voorhees RM, Fernandez IS, Scheres SHW, et al. (2014) Structure of the Mammalian ribosome-sec61 complex to 3.4Å resolution. Cell 157: 1632-1643.
  • 19. Li X, Mooney P, Zheng S, et al. (2013) Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable near-atomic-resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nat Methods 10: 584-590.    
  • 20. Lu P, Bai X-C, Ma D, et al. (2014) Three-dimensional structure of human γ-secretase. Nature 512: 166-170.    
  • 21. Wu B, Peisley A, Tetrault D, et al. (2014) Molecular imprinting as a signal-activation mechanism of the viral RNA sensor RIG-I. Mol Cell 55: 511-523.    
  • 22. Bharat TAM, Murshudov GN, Sachse C, et al. (2015) Structures of actin-like ParM filaments show architecture of plasmid-segregating spindles. Nature: 1-5.
  • 23. Ecken von der J, Müller M, Lehman W, et al. (2015) Structure of the F-actin-tropomyosin complex. Nature 519: 114-117.
  • 24. Fromm SA, Bharat TAM, Jakobi AJ, et al. (2015) Seeing tobacco mosaic virus through direct electron detectors. J Struct Biol 189: 87-97.    
  • 25. Behrmann E, Tao G, Stokes DL, et al. (2012) Real-space processing of helical filaments in SPARX. J Struct Biol: 1-12.
  • 26. Egelman EH (2000) A robust algorithm for the reconstruction of helical filaments using single-particle methods. Ultramicroscopy 85: 225-234.    
  • 27. Desfosses A, Ciuffa R, Gutsche I, et al. (2014) SPRING—an image processing package for single-particle based helical reconstruction from electron cryomicrographs. J Struct Biol 185: 15-26.    
  • 28. Rohou A, Grigorieff N (2014) Frealix: model-based refinement of helical filament structures from electron micrographs. J Struct Biol 186: 234-244.    
  • 29. Sindelar CV, Downing KH (2007) The beginning of kinesin's force-generating cycle visualized at 9-A resolution. J Cell Biol 177: 377-385.    
  • 30. Klug A, Crick FHC, Wyckhoff HW (1958) Diffraction by Helical Structures. Acta Crystallographica 11: 199-213.    
  • 31. Caspar DL, Klug A (1962) Physical principles in the construction of regular viruses. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 27: 1-24.    
  • 32. Moore PB, Huxley HE, DeRosier DJ (1970) Three-dimensional reconstruction of F-actin, thin filaments and decorated thin filaments. J Mol Biol 50: 279-295.    
  • 33. Mandelkow EM, Mandelkow E (1985) Unstained microtubules studied by cryo-electron microscopy. Substructure, supertwist and disassembly. J Mol Biol 181: 123-135.
  • 34. Finch JT (1964) Resolution of the substructure of tobacco mosaic virus in the electron microscope. J Mol Biol 8: 872-874.    
  • 35. Sachse C, Fändrich M, Grigorieff N (2008) Paired beta-sheet structure of an Abeta(1-40) amyloid fibril revealed by electron microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 7462-7466.    
  • 36. Carragher B, Bluemke DA, Gabriel B, et al. (1988) Structural analysis of polymers of sickle cell hemoglobin. I. Sickle hemoglobin fibers. J Mol Biol 199: 315-331.
  • 37. Xu C, Rice WJ, He W, et al. (2002) A structural model for the catalytic cycle of Ca(2+)-ATPase. J Mol Biol 316: 201-211.    
  • 38. Korkhov VM, Sachse C, Short JM, et al. (2010) Three-dimensional structure of TspO by electron cryomicroscopy of helical crystals. Structure 18: 677-687.    
  • 39. Hou F, Sun L, Zheng H, et al. (2011) MAVS forms functional prion-like aggregates to activate and propagate antiviral innate immune response. Cell 146: 448-461.    
  • 40. Alushin GM, Lander GC, Kellogg EH, et al. (2014) High-Resolution Microtubule Structures Reveal the Structural Transitionsin ab-Tubulin upon GTP Hydrolysis. Cell 157: 1117-1129.    
  • 41. Galkin VE, Orlova A, Vos MR, et al. (2015) Near-atomic resolution for one state of f-actin. Structure 23: 173-182.    
  • 42. Stewart M (1988) Computer image processing of electron micrographs of biological structures with helical symmetry. J Electron Microsc Tech 9: 325-358.    
  • 43. DeRosier DJ, Moore PB (1970) Reconstruction of three-dimensional images from electron micrographs of structures with helical symmetry. J Mol Biol 52: 355-369.    
  • 44. Moody MF (1990) Biophysical electron microscopy: basic concepts and modern techniques—image analysis of electron micrographs‎. 517.
  • 45. Carragher B, Whittaker M, Milligan RA (1996) Helical processing using PHOELIX. J Struct Biol 116: 107-112.    
  • 46. Owen CH, Morgan DG, DeRosier DJ (1996) Image analysis of helical objects: the Brandeis Helical Package. J Struct Biol 116: 167-175.    
  • 47. Beroukhim R, Unwin N (1997) Distortion correction of tubular crystals: improvements in the acetylcholine receptor structure. Ultramicroscopy 70: 57-81.    
  • 48. Pomfret AJ, Rice WJ, Stokes DL (2007) Application of the iterative helical real-space reconstruction method to large membranous tubular crystals of P-type ATPases. J Struct Biol 157: 106-116.    
  • 49. Ramey VH, Wang H-W, Nogales E (2009) Ab initio reconstruction of helical samples with heterogeneity, disorder and coexisting symmetries. J Struct Biol 167: 97-105.    
  • 50. Diaz R, Rice WJ, Stokes DL. (2010) Fourier-Bessel reconstruction of helical assemblies. Meth Enzymol 482: 131-165.    
  • 51. Erickson HP, Klug A (1971) Measurement and Compensation of Defocusing and Aberrations by Fourier Processing of Electron Micrographs. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci 261: 105-118.    
  • 52. Henderson R (1992) Image contrast in high-resolution electron microscopy of biological macromolecules: TMV in ice. Ultramicroscopy 46: 1-18.    
  • 53. Glaeser RM (2007) Electron Crystallography of Helical Structures in Electron Crystallography of Biological Macromolecules. Oxford University Press, USA; 2007: 304-342.
  • 54. Egelman EH (2010) Reconstruction of helical filaments and tubes. Meth Enzymol 482: 167-183.    
  • 55. Heymann JB, Chagoyen M, Belnap DM (2005) Common conventions for interchange and archiving of three-dimensional electron microscopy information in structural biology. J Struct Biol 151:196-207.    
  • 56. Egelman EH (2014) Ambiguities in helical reconstruction. eLife 3.
  • 57. Vonck J (2000) Parameters affecting specimen flatness of two-dimensional crystals for electron crystallography. Ultramicroscopy 85: 123-129.    
  • 58. Moody MF (2011) Structural Biology Using Electrons and X-Rays. Academic Press; 2011.
  • 59. Sachse C, Xu C, Wieligmann K, et al. (2006) Quaternary structure of a mature amyloid fibril from Alzheimer's Abeta(1-40) peptide. J Mol Biol 362: 347-354.    
  • 60. Lučić V, Förster F, Baumeister W (2005) STRUCTURAL STUDIES BY ELECTRON TOMOGRAPHY: From Cells to Molecules. Annu Rev Biochem 74: 833-865.    
  • 61. Briggs JA (2013) Structural biology in situ—the potential of subtomogram averaging. Curr Opin Struct Biol 23: 261-267.    
  • 62. Skruzny M, Desfosses A, Prinz S, et al. (2015) An Organized Co-assembly of Clathrin Adaptors Is Essential for Endocytosis. Dev Cell 33: 150-162.    
  • 63. Bharat TAM, Davey NE, Ulbrich P, et al. (2012) Structure of the immature retroviral capsid at 8Å resolution by cryo-electron microscopy. Nature 487: 385-389.    
  • 64. Wall JS, Hainfeld JF (1986) Mass mapping with the scanning transmission electron microscope. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 15: 355-376.    
  • 65. Wall JS, Simon MN (2001) Scanning transmission electron microscopy of DNA-protein complexes. Methods Mol Biol 148: 589-601.
  • 66. Scheele RB, Borisy GG (1978) Electron microscopy of metal-shadowed and negatively stained microtubule protein. Structure of the 30 S oligomer. J Biol Chem 253: 2846-2851.
  • 67. Hoenger A, Doerhoefer M, Woehlke G, et al. (2000) Surface topography of microtubule walls decorated with monomeric and dimeric kinesin constructs. Biol Chem 381: 1001-1011.
  • 68. Schmitz S, Schaap IAT, Kleinjung J, et al. (2010) Malaria Parasite Actin Polymerization and Filament Structure. J Biol Chem 285: 36577-36585.    
  • 69. Finch JT (1972) The hand of the helix of tobacco virus. J Mol Biol 66: 291-294.    
  • 70. Low HH, Sachse C, Amos LA, et al. (2009) Structure of a bacterial dynamin-like protein lipid tube provides a mechanism for assembly and membrane curving. Cell 139: 1342-1352.    
  • 71. Stewart A, Grigorieff N (2004) Noise bias in the refinement of structures derived from single particles. Ultramicroscopy 102: 67-84.    
  • 72. Mindell JA, Grigorieff N (2003) Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy. J Struct Biol 142: 334-347.    
  • 73. Grigorieff N (1998) Three-dimensional structure of bovine NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex I) at 22 A in ice. J Mol Biol 277: 1033-1046.    
  • 74. Fujii T, Iwane AH, Yanagida T, et al. (2010) Direct visualization of secondary structures of F-actin by electron cryomicroscopy. Nature 467: 724-728.    
  • 75. Grigorieff N (2007) FREALIGN: high-resolution refinement of single particle structures. J Struct Biol 157: 117-125.    
  • 76. Heymann JB, Belnap DM (2007) Bsoft: image processing and molecular modeling for electron microscopy. J Struct Biol 157: 3-18.    
  • 77. Scheres SHW (2012) RELION: Implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J Struct Biol 180: 519-530.    
  • 78. Clemens DL, Ge P, Lee B-Y, et al. (2015) Atomic Structure of T6SS Reveals Interlaced Array Essential to Function. Cell 160: 940-951.    
  • 79. Gutsche I, Desfosses A, Effantin G, et al. (2015) Structural virology. Near-atomic cryo-EM structure of the helical measles virus nucleocapsid. Science 348: 704-707.
  • 80. Ciuffa R, Lamark T, Tarafder AK, et al. (2015) The Selective Autophagy Receptor p62 Forms a Flexible Filamentous Helical Scaffold. Cell Rep 11: 748-758.    
  • 81. Kühlbrandt W (2014) The Resolution Revolution. Science 343: 1443-1444.    
  • 82. Faruqi AR, Henderson R (2007) Electronic detectors for electron microscopy. Curr Opin Struct Biol 17: 549-555.    
  • 83. Wang Z, Hryc CF, Bammes B, et al. (2014) An atomic model of brome mosaic virus using direct electron detection and real-space optimization. Nat Commun 5: 4808.    
  • 84. Campbell MG, Cheng A, Brilot AF, et al. (2012) Movies of ice-embedded particles enhance resolution in electron cryo-microscopy. Structure 20: 1823-1828.    
  • 85. Bartesaghi A, Matthies D, Banerjee S, et al. (2014) Structure of β-galactosidase at 3.2-Å resolution obtained by cryo-electron microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: 11709-11714.
  • 86. Allegretti M, Mills DJ, McMullan G, et al. (2014) Atomic model of the F420-reducing [NiFe] hydrogenase by electron cryo-microscopy using a direct electron detector. eLife 3: e01963-e01963.
  • 87. Brilot AF, Chen JZ, Cheng A, et al. (2012) Beam-induced motion of vitrified specimen on holey carbon film. J Struct Biol 177: 630-637.    
  • 88. Scheres SH (2014) Beam-induced motion correction for sub-megadalton cryo-EM particles. eLife 3: e03665.
  • 89. Holmes K, Franklin R (1958) The radial density distribution in some strains of tobacco mosaic virus. Virology 6: 328-336.    
  • 90. Cyrklaff M, Kühlbrandt W (1994) High-resolution electron microscopy of biological specimens in cubic ice. Ultramicroscopy 55: 141-153.    
  • 91. Grant T, Grigorieff N (2015) Measuring the optimal exposure for single particle cryo-EM using a 2.6Å reconstruction of rotavirus VP6. eLife 4.
  • 92. Bartesaghi A, Merk A, Banerjee S, et al. (2015) Electron microscopy. 2.2Å resolution cryo-EM structure of β-galactosidase in complex with a cell-permeant inhibitor. Science 348: 1147-1151.
  • 93. McMullan G, Faruqi AR, Henderson R, et al. (2009) Experimental observation of the improvement in MTF from backthinning a CMOS direct electron detector. Ultramicroscopy 109: 1144-1147.    


This article has been cited by

  • 1. , , , ,
  • 2. Soumeya A. Jaballah, Graham D. Bailey, Ambroise Desfosses, Jaekyung Hyun, Alok K. Mitra, Richard L. Kingston,  In vitro assembly of the Rous Sarcoma Virus capsid protein into hexamer tubes at physiological temperature, Scientific Reports, 2017, 7, 1, 10.1038/s41598-017-02060-0
  • 3. S.A. Fromm, C. Sachse, , The Resolution Revolution: Recent Advances In cryoEM, 2016, 307, 10.1016/bs.mie.2016.05.034
  • 4. Denis Ptchelkine, Ashley Gillum, Tomohiro Mochizuki, Soizick Lucas-Staat, Ying Liu, Mart Krupovic, Simon E. V. Phillips, David Prangishvili, Juha T. Huiskonen, Unique architecture of thermophilic archaeal virus APBV1 and its genome packaging, Nature Communications, 2017, 8, 1, 10.1038/s41467-017-01668-0
  • 5. Stefan T. Huber, Tanja Kuhm, Carsten Sachse, Automated tracing of helical assemblies from electron cryo-micrographs, Journal of Structural Biology, 2017, 10.1016/j.jsb.2017.11.013
  • 6. Ingemar André, , Protein Complex Assembly, 2018, Chapter 30, 475, 10.1007/978-1-4939-7759-8_30
  • 7. Xinmeng Li, Francesco Buda, Huub J.M. de Groot, G. J. Agur Sevink, Contrasting Modes of Self-Assembly and Hydrogen-Bonding Heterogeneity in Chlorosomes of Chlorobaculum tepidum, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2018, 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01790
  • 8. Xinmeng Li, Francesco Buda, Huub J. M. de Groot, G. J. Agur. Sevink, Molecular Insight in the Optical Response of Tubular Chlorosomal Assemblies, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2019, 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b03913
  • 9. Spencer A. Hughes, Fengbin Wang, Shengyuan Wang, Mark A. B. Kreutzberger, Tomasz Osinski, Albina Orlova, Joseph S. Wall, Xiaobing Zuo, Edward H. Egelman, Vincent P. Conticello, Ambidextrous helical nanotubes from self-assembly of designed helical hairpin motifs, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2019, 201903910, 10.1073/pnas.1903910116
  • 10. Guilherme A.P. de Oliveira, Yraima Cordeiro, Jerson L. Silva, Tuane C.R.G. Vieira, , Protein Misfolding, 2019, 289, 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2019.08.002
  • 11. Liisa Lutter, Christopher J. Serpell, Mick F. Tuite, Louise C. Serpell, Wei-Feng Xue, Three-dimensional reconstruction of individual helical nano-filament structures from atomic force microscopy topographs, Biomolecular Concepts, 2020, 11, 1, 102, 10.1515/bmc-2020-0009

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

Copyright Info: 2015, Carsten Sachse, licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved