Effect of fruit size on fruit quality, shelf life and microbial activity in cherry tomatoes

Mohammad Zahirul Islam; Young-Tack Lee; Mahmuda Akter Mele; In-Lee Choi; Ho-Min Kang; Mohammad Zahirul Islam; Young-Tack Lee; Mahmuda Akter Mele; In-Lee Choi; Ho-Min Kang

doi:10.3934/agrfood.2019.2.340

AIMS Agriculture and Food

2019, Volume 4, Issue 2: 340-348. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.2.340

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Effect of fruit size on fruit quality, shelf life and microbial activity in cherry tomatoes

1.
Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Korea
2.
Division of Horticulture and Systems Engineering, Program of Horticulture, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea
3.
Agriculture and Life Science Research Institute, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea

Received: 25 January 2019 Accepted: 17 April 2019 Published: 24 April 2019

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of large, medium, and small fruit sizes on fruit quality, shelf life, and microbial activity in cherry tomatoes. Large (31.28 mm), medium (28.52 mm), and small (24.16 mm) tomatoes were harvested at light red maturity in Gangwon Province in the Republic of Korea. The quality of the tomatoes was measured at harvest time. Following harvest, the tomatoes were stored at 5 ℃; they were kept in boxes, acting as controls, or packed with a 20,000 cc oxygen transmission rate (OTR), acting as modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) to measure postharvest quality. The large tomatoes showed lower rates of respiration and ethylene production compared to the other sizes. The rate of fresh weight loss was the highest in the small tomatoes. A prolonged shelf life was observed in the large tomatoes. The rate of fungal incidence was lower in the large tomatoes compared with the medium and small ones. On the final day of storage, the large tomatoes retained the highest level of firmness and the concentrations of titratable acidity and vitamin C. However, the small tomatoes contained the highest level of soluble solids among the different sizes. Bacterial and fungal counts were the lowest in the large tomatoes. Based on the above results, large tomatoes may be better than smaller tomatoes for exporting over long distances.
- firmness,
- lycopene,
- Solanum lycopersicum,
- Unicorn,
- vitamin C
Citation: Mohammad Zahirul Islam, Young-Tack Lee, Mahmuda Akter Mele, In-Lee Choi, Ho-Min Kang. Effect of fruit size on fruit quality, shelf life and microbial activity in cherry tomatoes[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(2): 340-348. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.2.340

Related Papers:

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of large, medium, and small fruit sizes on fruit quality, shelf life, and microbial activity in cherry tomatoes. Large (31.28 mm), medium (28.52 mm), and small (24.16 mm) tomatoes were harvested at light red maturity in Gangwon Province in the Republic of Korea. The quality of the tomatoes was measured at harvest time. Following harvest, the tomatoes were stored at 5 ℃; they were kept in boxes, acting as controls, or packed with a 20,000 cc oxygen transmission rate (OTR), acting as modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) to measure postharvest quality. The large tomatoes showed lower rates of respiration and ethylene production compared to the other sizes. The rate of fresh weight loss was the highest in the small tomatoes. A prolonged shelf life was observed in the large tomatoes. The rate of fungal incidence was lower in the large tomatoes compared with the medium and small ones. On the final day of storage, the large tomatoes retained the highest level of firmness and the concentrations of titratable acidity and vitamin C. However, the small tomatoes contained the highest level of soluble solids among the different sizes. Bacterial and fungal counts were the lowest in the large tomatoes. Based on the above results, large tomatoes may be better than smaller tomatoes for exporting over long distances.

References

[1]	Kitinoja L, Gorny JR (1999) Postharvest technology for small-scale produce marketers: Economic opportunities, quality and food safety. UX Postharvest Technology Research and Information Center, Series, 21, April, Davis, USA.
[2]	Kitinoja L, Kader AA (2002) Small-scale postharvest handling practices: A manual for horticultural crops, In: Postharvest Horticulture Series No. 8E, 4th Eds., Postharvest Technology Research and Information Center, University of California, Davis, USA.
[3]	Gruda N (2005) Impact of environmental factors on product quality of greenhouse vegetables for fresh consumption. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24: 227–247. doi: 10.1080/07352680591008628
[4]	Kader AA, Rolle RS (2004) The role of post-harvest management in assuring the quality and safety of horticultural produce. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin 152, Publishing Management Service, Information Division, FAO, Rome, Italy.
[5]	Islam MZ, Mele MA, Choi KY, et al. (2018) Nutrient and salinity concentrations effects on quality and storability of cherry tomato fruits grown by hydroponic system. Bragantia 77: 385–393. doi: 10.1590/1678-4499.2017185
[6]	Mele MA, Islam MZ, Kang HM, et al. (2018) Pre-and post-harvest factors and their impact on oil composition and quality of olive fruit. Emir J Food Agric 30: 592–603.
[7]	Figàs MR, Prohens J, Raigón MD, et al. (2015) Characterization of composition traits related to organoleptic and functional quality for the differentiation, selection and enhancement of local varieties of tomato from different cultivar groups. Food Chem 187: 517–524. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.04.083
[8]	Grandillo S, Ku H, Tanksley S (1999) Identifying the loci responsible for natural variation in fruit size. Theor Appl Genet 99: 978–987. doi: 10.1007/s001220051405
[9]	Banerjee MK, Kalloo G (1989) The inheritance of earliness and fruit weight in crosses between cultivated tomatoes and two species of Lycopersicon. Plant Breed 102: 148–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1989.tb00328.x
[10]	Tanksley SD (2004) The genetic, developmental, and molecular bases of fruit size. Plant Cell 16: S181–S189. doi: 10.1105/tpc.018119
[11]	Islam MZ, Mele MA, Choi KY, et al. (2018) The effect of silicon and boron foliar application on the quality and shelf life of cherry tomatoes. Zemdirbyste 105: 159–164. doi: 10.13080/z-a.2018.105.020
[12]	Mele MA, Islam MZ, Baek JP, et al. (2017) Quality, storability, and essential oil content of Ligularia fischeri during modified atmosphere packaging storage. J Food Sci Technol 54: 743–750. doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-2514-y
[13]	Islam MZ, Mele MA, Kang HM (2018) Gaseous, physicochemical and microbial performances of silicon foliar spraying techniques on cherry tomatoes. J Agr Sci 40: 185–192.
[14]	Islam MZ, Mele MA, Baek JP, et al. (2016) Cherry tomato qualities affected by foliar spraying with boron and calcium. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 57: 46–52. doi: 10.1007/s13580-016-0097-6
[15]	Islam MZ, Mele MA, Baek JP, et al. (2018) Iron, iodine and selenium effects on quality, shelf life and microbial activity of cherry tomatoes. Not Bot Horti Agrobo 46: 388–392. doi: 10.15835/nbha46211012
[16]	Kays JS, Paull RE (2004) Postharvest Biology. Exon Press, Athens.
[17]	Brown BI, Wills RBH (1983) Post-harvest changes in guava fruit of different maturity. Sci Hort 19: 237–243. doi: 10.1016/0304-4238(83)90069-9
[18]	Dìaz-Pèrez JC, Muy-Rangel MD, Mascorro AG (2007) Fruit size and stage of ripeness affect postharvest water loss in bell pepper fruit (Capsicum annuum L.). J Sci Food Agric 87: 68–73. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2672
[19]	El-Ramady HR, Domokos-Szabolcsy E, Abdalla M, et al. (2015) Postharvest management of fruits and vegetables storage. Sustain Agr Rev 15: 65–152. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-09132-7_2
[20]	Dorais M, Papadopoulos AP, Gosselin A (2001) Greenhouse tomato fruit quality. Hortic Rev 26: 239–27.
[21]	Argenta LC, Krammes JG, Megguer CA, et al. (2003) Ripening and quality of 'Laetitia' plums following harvest and cold storage as affected by inhibition of ethylene action. Pesq Agropec Bras 38: 1139–1148. doi: 10.1590/S0100-204X2003001000002
[22]	Islam MZ, Lee YT, Mele MA, et al. (2018) Effect of pre-harvest potassium foliar spray and postharvest storage methods on quality and shelf life of cherry tomatoes. Res J Biotechnol 13: 49–54.
[23]	Islam MZ, Mele MA, Choi K, et al. (2018) Salicylic acid in nutrient solution influence the fruit quality and shelf life of cherry tomato grown in hydroponics. Sains Malaysiana 47: 537–542. doi: 10.17576/jsm-2018-4703-14
[24]	Brandt S, Pek Z, Barna E, et al. (2006) Lycopene content and colour of ripening tomatoes as affected by environmental conditions. J Sci Food Agr 86: 568–572. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2390
[25]	Weingart H, Ullrich H, Geider K, et al. (2001) The role of ethylene production in virulence of Pseudomonas syringae pvs. glycinea and phaseolicola. Phytopathology 91: 511–518. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2001.91.5.511

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)