Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Effect of biochar on Chinese kale and carbon storage in an agricultural area on a high rise building

1 Environmental Research Institute, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
2 Chula UNISEARCH, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand

Supplementation of agricultural soil with biochar can positively affect growth and yield of crop plants. In this study, a mixture of different amounts of rice husk biochar (RHB) at 1.5%, 2.0% or 2.5% by weight (wt.%) and 20 wt.% vermicompost were used to grow Chinese kale in a soil on a high rise building in Bangkok city. The effect of this mixture on yields of Chinese kale and the level of carbon storage in the soil and plants were evaluated, since this could contribute towards urban food security and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Eight treatments were evaluated as (i) the soil alone (TC), and soil supplemented with (ii) 20 wt.% vermicompost (TM20), (iii–v) RHB (TB1.5, TB2.0 and TB2.5), or (vi–viii) vermicompost with RHB (TMB1.5, TMB2.0 and TMB2.5). Treatment TMB2.0 gave the highest yield of Chinese kale shoots, followed by TMB2.5, TM20 and TMB1.5, respectively. In addition, TMB2.5 gave the highest carbon storage in the soil plus plants, followed by TMB20, TM20 and TMB1.5. Thus, adding the appropriate amount of RHB and vermicompost mixture in the soil led to a higher yield of plant products, including an increased level of soil carbon storage. Applying RHB in urbanized agricultural areas is an alternative way for metropolitan areas to boost the yields of crop plants for food sustainability and long-term urbanized environmental management.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

Keywords rice husk; biochar; food security; urban agriculture; urban food production

Citation: Saowanee Wijitkosum, Preamsuda Jiwnok. Effect of biochar on Chinese kale and carbon storage in an agricultural area on a high rise building. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(1): 177-193. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.1.177

References

  • 1. Lehmann J, Joseph S (2015) Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation. New York: Routledge.
  • 2. Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W (2002) Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal-A review. Biol Fertil Soils 35: 219–230.    
  • 3. Gul S, Whalen JK, Thomas BW, et al. (2015) Physico-chemical properties and microbial responses in biochar-amended soils: mechanisms and future directions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 206: 46–59.    
  • 4. Preston CM, Schmidt MWI (2006) Black (pyrogenic) carbon: A synthesis of current knowledge and uncertainties with special consideration of boreal regions. Biogeosciences 3: 397–420.    
  • 5. Brassard P, Godbout S, Raghavan V (2016) Soil biochar amendment as a climate change mitigation tool: Key parameters and mechanisms involved. J Environ Manage 181: 484–497.    
  • 6. Liu J, Shan J, Li Y, et al. (2014) Effect of biochar amendment on the net greenhouse gas emission and greenhouse gas intensity in a Chinese double rice cropping system. Eur J Soil Biol 65: 30–39.    
  • 7. Manyà JJ (2012) Pyrolysis for biochar purposes: A review to establish current knowledge gaps and research needs. Environ Sci Technol 46: 7939–7954.    
  • 8. Sriburi T, Wijitkosum S (2016) Chapter 18 Biochar Amendment Experiments in Thailand: Practical Examples. In: Bruckman VJ, Varol EA, Uzun BB, et al. Eds. Biochar A Regional Supply Chain Approach in View of Climate Change Mitigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 351–367.
  • 9. Cao Y, Ma Y, Guo D, et al. (2017) Chemical properties and microbial responses to biochar and compost amendments in the soil under continuous watermelon cropping. Plant Soil Environ 63: 1–7.    
  • 10. Graber ER, Frenkel O, Jaiswal AK, et al. (2014) How may biochar influence severity of diseases caused by soilborne pathogens? Carbon Manag 5: 169–183.    
  • 11. Qambrani NA, Rahman MM, Won S, et al. (2017) Biochar properties and eco-friendly applications for climate change mitigation, waste management, and wastewater treatment: A review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 79: 255–273.    
  • 12. Wijitkosum S, Kallayasiri W (2015) The Use of Biochar to Increase Productivity of Indigenous Upland Rice (Oryza sativa L.) and Improve Soil Properties. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci 6: 1326–1336.
  • 13. Yooyen J, Wijitkosum S, Sriburi T (2015) Increasing yield of soybean by adding biochar. J Environ Res Develop 9: 1066–1074.
  • 14. Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: An introduction. In: Lehman J, Joseph S Eds. Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. London: Earthscan, 1–10.
  • 15. Agegnehu G, Srivastava AK, Bird MI (2017) The role of biochar and biochar-compost in improving soil quality and crop performance: A review. Appl Soil Ecol 119: 156–170    
  • 16. Sriburi T, Wijitkosum S (2015) Using Biochar for soil Stabilization and Increasing of Yield for Food Security and Sustainable Agriculture Initiatives. Final report, National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT).
  • 17. Jha P, Biswas AK, Lakaria BL, et al. (2010) Biochar in agriculture-prospects and related implications. Curr Sci 99: 1218–1225.
  • 18. Lehmann J (2009) Biological carbon sequestration must and can be a win-win approach. Clim Change 97: 459–463.    
  • 19. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2015. FAO Statistical Pocketbook 2015. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  • 20. Mekuria W, Getnet K, Noble A, et al. (2013) Economic valuation of organic and clay-based soil amendments in small-scale agriculture in Lao PDR. Field Crops Research 149: 379–389.    
  • 21. Joseph S, Anh ML, Clare A, et al. (2015) Socio-economic feasibility, implementation and evaluation of small-scale biochar projects. Lehmann J and Joseph S 2015. Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation. New York: Routledge.
  • 22. Galinato G, Yoder J, Granatstein D (2011) The Economic Value of Biochar in Crop Production and Carbon Sequestration. Energy Policy 39: 6344–6350.    
  • 23. Mohammadi A, Cowie AL, Cacho O, et al. (2017) Biochar addition in rice farming systems: Economic and energy benefits. Energy 140: 415–425.    
  • 24. Dickinson D, Balduccio L, Buysse J, et al. (2014) Cost‐benefit analysis of using biochar to improve cereals agriculture. GCB Bioenergy 7: 850–864.
  • 25. Sriburi T, Wijitkosum S, Mattayom B (2019) Biochar and its application in agriculture. Bangkok: S. Asia Press (in Thai).
  • 26. Lovell ST (2010) Multifunctional Urban Agriculture for Sustainable Land Use Planning in the United States. Sustainability 2: 2499–2522.    
  • 27. Smit J, Nasr J, Ratta A (2001) Urban agriculture: Food, jobs and sustainable cities. New York: The Urban Agriculture Network, Inc.
  • 28. Carter T, Keeler A (2008) Life-cycle cost-benefit analysis of extensive vegetated roof systems. J Environ Manage 87: 350–363.    
  • 29. Safayet M, Arefin MF, Hasan MMU (2017) Present practice and future prospect of rooftop farming in Dhaka city: A step towards urban sustainability. J Urban Manage 6: 56–65.    
  • 30. Hui SDC (2011) Green roof urban farming for buildings in high-density urban cities. In The Hainan China World Green Roof Conference 2011. Available from: https://hub.hku.hk/bitstream/10722/140388/1/Content.pdf?accept=1.
  • 31. Dominguez J, Edwards CA, Ashby J (2001) The biology and population dynamics of Eudrilus eugeniae (Kinberg) (Oligochaeta) in cattle waste solids. Pedobiologia 45: 341–353.    
  • 32. Watcharathai S 2008. Study on carbon balance and soil carbon sequestration in planted with Jatropha curcas L. on clay and sandy loam soils. Master's Thesis, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok (Thailand).
  • 33. Petsri S, Pumijumnong N, Wachrinrat C, et al. (2007) Aboveground carbon content in mixed deciduous forest and teak plantations. Environ Nat Resour J 5: 1–10.
  • 34. Ponce-Hernandez R (2004) Assessing carbon stocks and modelling win-win scenarios of carbon sequestration through land-use changes. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  • 35. Rueangkhanab M, Chiarawipa R, Charoensang U, et al. (2014) Assessment of biomass and carbon storage in citrus orchards. Khon Kaen Agr J 2: 345–353.
  • 36. Zheng H, Ouyang Z, Xu W, et al. (2008) Variation of carbon storage by different reforestation types in the hilly red soil region of southern China. Forest Ecol Manag 255: 1113–1121.    
  • 37. Chintala R, Schumacher TE, Kumar S, et al. (2014) Molecular characterization of biochars and their influence on microbiological properties of soil. J Hazard Mater 279: 244–256.    
  • 38. Liu W, Jiang H, Yu H (2015) Development of Biochar-Based Functional Materials: Toward a Sustainable Platform Carbon Material. Chem Rev 115: 12251–12285.    
  • 39. Liang B, Lehmann J, Solomon D, et al. (2006) Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70: 1719–1730.    
  • 40. Amonette J, Joseph S (2009) Characteristics of Biochar: Micro Chemical Properties. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S, Eds., Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. London: Earthscan, 33–52.
  • 41. Mašek O, Brownsort PA (2010) Research on production of bespoke biochar. Poster presented in the 2nd UKBRC conference, Rothamsted, UK. Available from: https://www.biochar.ac.uk/abstract.php?id=32.
  • 42. Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, et al. (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota-A review. Soil Biol Biochem 43: 1812–1836.    
  • 43. Wang J, Xiong Z, Kuzyakov Y (2016) Biochar stability in soil: meta-analysis of decomposition and priming effects. GCB Bioenergy 8: 512–523.    
  • 44. Steiner C, Glaser B, Teixeira WG, et al. (2008) Nitrogen Retention and Plant Uptake on a Highly Weathered Central Amazonian Ferralsol ammended with Compost and Charcoal. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 171: 893–899.    
  • 45. Abiven S, Hund A, Martinsen V, et al. (2015) Biochar amendment increases maize root surface areas and branching: A shovelomics study in Zambia. Plant Soil 395: 45–55.    
  • 46. Agegnehu G, Bird M, Nelson P, et al. (2015) The ameliorating effects of biochar and compost on soil quality and plant growth on a Ferralsol. Soil Research 53: 1–12.    
  • 47. Dunsin O, Aboyeji CM, Adekiya AO, et al. (2016) Effect of Biochar and Npk Fertilizer on Growth, Biomass Yield and Nutritional Quality of Kale (Brassica Oleracea) in a Derived Agro-Ecological Zone of Nigeria. Prod Agri Technol J 12: 135–141.
  • 48. Bouajila A, Gallali T (2008) Soil organic carbon fractions and aggregate stability in carbonated and no carbonated soils in Tunisia. J Agron 7: 127–137.    
  • 49. Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M (2006) Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems-a review. Mitig Adapt Strat Gl 11: 403–427.    
  • 50. Schmidt MW, Torn MS, Abiven S, et al. (2011) Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature 478: 49–56.    
  • 51. Lehmann J, Czimczik C, Laird D, et al. (2009) Stability of biochar in soil. In: Lehmann J, S. Joseph S, Eds. Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. London: Earthscan, 169–182.
  • 52. Cheng CH, Lehmann J, Thies JE, et al. (2006) Oxidation of black carbon by biotic and abiotic processes. Org Geochem 37: 1477–1488.    
  • 53. Liu L, Shen G, Sun M, et al. (2014) Effect of biochar on nitrous oxide emission and its potential mechanisms. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 64: 894–902.    
  • 54. Schulz H, Dunst G, Glaser B (2013) Positive effects of composted biochar on plant growth and soil fertility. Agron Sustain Dev 33: 817–827.    
  • 55. Karhu K, Mattilab T, Bergstroma I, et al. (2011) Biochar addition to agricultural soil increased CH4 uptake and water holding capacity-Results from a short-term pilot field study. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140: 309–313.    
  • 56. Liu Y, Yang M, Wu Y, et al. (2011) Reducing CH4 and CO2 emissions from waterlogged paddy soil with biochar. J Soils Sediment 11: 930–939.    
  • 57. Wu F, Jia Z, Wang S, et al. (2013) Contrasting effects of wheat straw and its biochar on greenhouse gas emissions and enzyme activities in a Chernozemic soil. Biol Fertil Soils 49: 555–565.    
  • 58. Raya-Moreno I, Cañizares R, Domene X, et al. (2017) Comparing current chemical methods to assess biochar organic carbon in a Mediterranean agricultural soil amended with two different biochars. Sci Total Environ 598: 604–618.    
  • 59. Singh BP, Cowie AL, Smernik RJ (2012) Biochar carbon stability in a clayey soil as a function of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature. Environ Sci Technol 46: 11770–11778.    
  • 60. International Biochar Initiative (2015) Standardized Product Definition and Product Testing Guidelines for Biochar That Is Used in Soil. IBI-STD-2.1. Available form: www.biochar-international/org.characterizationstandard.
  • 61. Liang B, Lehmann J, Sohi PS, et al. (2010) Black carbon affects the cycling of non-black carbon in soil. Org Geochem 41: 206–213.    
  • 62. Timilsina S, Jibrinc MO, Potnis N, et al. (2015) Multilocus sequence analysis of xanthomonads causing bacterial spot of tomato and pepper plants reveals strains generated by recombination among species and recent global spread of Xanthomonas gardneri. Appl Environ Microbiol 81: 1520–1529.    
  • 63. Kim KH, Kim J, Cho T, et al. (2012) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on physicochemical properties of biochar obtained from the fast pyrolysis of pitch pine (Pinus rigida). Bioresour Technol 118: 158–162.    
  • 64. Lehmann J (2007) A handful of carbon. Nature 447: 143–144.    
  • 65. Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Laird DL, et al. (2009) Impact of Biochar Amendment on Fertility of a Southeastern Coastal Plain Soil. Soil Sci 174: 105–112.    

 

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved