Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Mini review: fruit residues as plant biostimulants for bio-based product recovery

1 Dipartimento di Agronomia, Animali, Alimenti, Risorse Naturali e Ambiente, Università di Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
2 Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Università di Bologna, viale Fanin 40, 40127 Bologna, Italy

Special Editions: Use of biostimulant in agriculture to improve plant performance and crop quality

The request of natural products has augmented in the last years due to the increase in intolerance and allergy reactions showed by humans versus pesticides and certain chemical compounds used in agriculture. In response to this demand, innovative methods and new natural matrices have been exploited to obtain products able to increase plant nutrients use efficiency. In this context, agro-industrial residues contain bioactive molecules, including antioxidants and phenols, which may be used by farmers to improve crop productivity. Phenols are ubiquitous in plants and are essential components of the human diet by virtue of their antioxidant properties. They may also act as positive growth regulators by modifying the root architecture and, consequently, the uptake of macronutrients, potassium especially. In order to understand their effects on the plant metabolic pathways, agro-industrial residues were supplied to maize plants and the activity of specific enzymes was evaluated. In this review, developments and improved understanding on fruit residues on primary and secondary plants metabolism are discussed.
  Article Metrics

Keywords phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL); Zea mays; elicitors; antioxidants; phenols

Citation: Andrea Ertani, Ornella Francioso, Serenella Nardi. Mini review: fruit residues as plant biostimulants for bio-based product recovery. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2017, 2(3): 251-257. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2017.3.251


  • 1. Schieber A, Ullrich W, Carle R (2000) Characterization of polyphenols in mango puree concentrate by HPLC with diode array and mass spectrometric detection. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 1: 161-166.    
  • 2. Balasundram N, Sundram K, Samman S (2006) Phenolic compounds in plant and agrindustrial byproducts: antioxidant activity, occurrence, and potential uses. Food Chem 99: 191-203.    
  • 3. Solange I, Mussatto LF, Ballesteros SM (2012) Use of agro-industrial wastes in solid-state fermentation processes, In: indus trial waste, Kuan-Yeow Show.Editor, In tech.
  • 4. da Silva MAG, Roque SAT, Muniz AS, et al. (2008) Use of agro-industrial organic compound: Yield and nutrient absorption in wheat. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 39: 1311-1320.    
  • 5. European Biostimulants Industry Council. EBIC and biostimulants in brief. 2012, Available from: http://www.biostimulants.eu/
  • 6. Nardi S, Pizzeghello D, Schiavon M, et al. (2016) Plant biostimulants: physiological responses induced by protein hydrolyzed-based products and humic substances in plant metabolism. Sci Agric 73: 18-23.    
  • 7. European Biostimulants Industry Council. Economic overview of the biostimulants sector in Europe. 2013. Available from: http://www.biostimulants.eu/2013/04/2013-overview-of-the-european-biostimulants-market/
  • 8. Calvo P, Nelson L, Kloepper JW (2014) Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil 383: 3-41.    
  • 9. European Biostimulants Industry Council. What are biostimulants? 2012, Available from: http://www.biostimulants.eu/about/what-are-biostimulants/
  • 10. Ertani A, Schiavon M, Altissimo A, et al. (2011) Phenol-containing organic substances stimulate phenylpropanoid metabolism in Zea mays. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 174: 496-503.    
  • 11. Ertani A, Pizzeghello D, Francioso O, et al. (2014) Capsicum chinensis L. growth and nutraceutical properties are enhanced by biostimulants in a long-term period: chemical and metabolomic approaches. Front Plant Sci 5: 375.
  • 12. Luque-Rodríguez J M, Luque de Castro MD, Pérez-Juan P, et al. (2007) Dynamic superheated liquid extraction of anthocyanins and other phenolics from red grape skins of winemaking residues. Bioresour Technol 98: 2705-2713.    
  • 13. Spigno G, Tramelli L, De Faveri DM (2007) Effects of extraction time, temperature and solvent on concentration and antioxidant activity of grape marc phenolics. J Food Eng 81: 200-208.    
  • 14. Vilkhu K, Mawson R, Simons L, et al. (2008) Applications and opportunities for ultrasound assisted extraction in the food industry: A review. Inn Food Sci Emerging Technol 9: 161-169.    
  • 15. Delgado de la Torre MP, Ferreiro-Vera C, Priego-Capote F, et al. (2012) Comparison of accelerated methods for the extraction of phenolic compounds from different vine-shoot cultivars. J Agric Food Chem 60: 3051-3060.    
  • 16. Mustafa A, Turner C (2011) Pressurized liquid extraction as a green approach in food and herbal plants extraction: A review. Anal Chim Acta 703: 8-18.    
  • 17. Pourmortazavi SM, Rahimi-Nasrabadi M, Hajimirsadeghi SS (2014) Supercritical fluid technology in analytical chemistry: A review. Curr Anal Chem 10: 3-28.
  • 18. Bhaskar N, Modi K, Govindaraju R, et al. (2007) Utilization of meat industry by products: protein hydrolysate from sheep visceral mass. Bioresour Technol 98: 388-394.    
  • 19. Rice EL (1995) Allelopathy, 2Eds., New York: Academic Press.
  • 20. Northup RR, Yu Z, Dahlgren RA, et al. (1998) Polyphenol control of nitrogen release from pine litter. Nature 77: 227-229.
  • 21. Inderjit (1996) Plant phenolics in allelopathy. Bot Rev 62: 182-202.
  • 22. Brebu M, Vasile C (2010) Thermal degradation of wood: A review. Cellul Chem Technol 44: 353-363.
  • 23. Hoareau W, Trindade WG, Siegmund B, et al. (2004) Sugar cane bagasse and curaua lignins oxidized by chlorine dioxide and reacted with furfuryl alcohol: Characterization and stability. Polym Degrad Stab 86: 567-576.    
  • 24. Selby C, Carmichael EHS, Sharma S (2016) Bio-refining of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne): evaluation of aqueous extracts for plant defence elicitor activity using French bean cell suspension cultures. Chem Biol Technol Agric 3: 11.    
  • 25. Sánchez-Gómez R, Zalacain A, Alonso GL, et al. (2014) Vine-shoot waste aqueous extracts for re-use in agriculture obtained by different extraction techniques: phenolic, volatile, and mineral compounds. J Agric Food Chem 62: 10861-10872.    
  • 26. Martínez-Gil AM, Angenieux M, Pardo-García AI, et al. (2013) Glycosidic aroma precursors of Syrah and Chardonnay grapes after an oak extract application to the grapevines. Food Chem 138: 956-965.    
  • 27. Martínez-Gil AM, Garde-Cerdán T, Martínez L, et al. (2011) Effect of oak extract application to Verdejo grapevines on grape and wine aroma. J Agric Food Chem 59: 3253-3263.    
  • 28. Bulgari R, Morgutti S, Cocetta G, et al. (2017) Evaluation of borage extracts as potential biostimulant using a phenomic, agronomic, physiological, and biochemical approach. Front Plant Sci 935: 1-8.


This article has been cited by

  • 1. Andrea Ertani, Serenella Nardi, Ornella Francioso, Santiago Sanchez-Cortes, Michele Di Foggia, Michela Schiavon, Effects of Two Protein Hydrolysates Obtained From Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and Spirulina platensis on Zea mays (L.) Plants, Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10, 10.3389/fpls.2019.00954

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

Copyright Info: 2017, Andrea Ertani, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved