Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

The import tariff changes and sectoral production in Turkey: a computable general equilibrium (CGE) modeling approach

Department of Public Finance, Hacettepe University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 06800 Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey

From the point of increasing trade liberalization policies worldwide, this study aims to test the effects of the changes in import tariffs in Turkey. For that purpose, we benefit from simultaneous equations based on a computable general equilibrium framework. We construct an updated social accounting matrix for Turkey which is compatible with our model by using different data sources. Our findings obtained from the model suggest that import tariff increase will provide increases in domestic production after each subsequent tariff rate reductions. Furthermore, increasing domestic production associates with improvements in trade deficits and employment. So, tariff-distorted effects of trade policy as such are said to be small in Turkey.
  Article Metrics

Keywords import tariffs; production; CGE; Turkey

Citation: Hüseyin T. Eğen, Hale Akbulut. The import tariff changes and sectoral production in Turkey: a computable general equilibrium (CGE) modeling approach. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2019, 3(3): 456-472. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2019.3.456


  • 1.Aghion P, Howitt P (2009) The Economics of Growth, London: The MIT Press.
  • 2.Araujo S, Flaig D (2016) Quantifying the effects of trade liberalization in Brazil: a CGE model Simulation. OECD Econ Dep Working Paper No. 1295.
  • 3.Armington PS (1969) A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. IMF Staff Pap 16: 159–178.    
  • 4.Caughlin CC, Chrystal KA, Wood GE (1988) Protectionist Trade Policies: A survey of Theory, Evidence and Rationale. Can Parliamentary Rev 70: 12–29.
  • 5.Chitiga M, Mabugu R (2005) The impact of tariff reduction on poverty in Zimbabwe: a CGE top-down approach. S Afr J Econ Manag Sci 8: 102–116.
  • 6.Cororation CB (2013) Economic impact analysis of the reduction in sugar tariffs under the ASEAN trade in goods agreement: The case of the Philippine sugar sector. GII Working Paper No. 2013–1.
  • 7.Dervis K, Robinson S (1978) The foreign exchange gap, growth and industrial strategy in Turkey: 1973–1983. World Bank Working Paper No. 306.
  • 8.Dervis K, De Melo J, Robinson S (1989) General equilibrium models for development policy, A World Bank research publication, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  • 9.Devarajan S, Robinson S (2002) The impact of computable general equilibrium models on policy, Presented at the Frontiers in Applied General Equilibrium Modeling, Yale University, New Haven.
  • 10.Diao X, Yeldan AE, Roe TL (1998) A simple dynamic applied general equilibrium model of a small open economy: transitional dynamics and trade policy. J Econ Dev 23: 77–101.
  • 11.Elsheikh OE, Elbushra AA, Salih AAA (2015) Economic impacts of changes in wheat's import tariff on the Sudanese economy. J Saudi Soc Agr Sci 14: 68–75.
  • 12.Erero JL, Pambudi DD, Bonga-Bonga L (2014) Effects of reducing tariffs in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC): a cge analysis. ERSA Working Paper No. 467.
  • 13.Erten H (2009) Türkiye için Sosyal Hesaplar Matrisi Üretme Yöntemi ve Istihdam Uzerine bir Hesaplanabilir Genel Denge Modeli Uygulaması, Ankara: Dissertation of Turkish Republic DPT, Ankara.
  • 14.Grossman G, Helpman E (1995) Technology and Trade. Handbook of International Economics 3: 1279–1337.    
  • 15.Harrison GW, Rutherford TF, Tarr DG (1997) Economic implications for Turkey of a customs union with the European Union. Eur Econ Rev 41: 861–870.    
  • 16.Hosoe N, Gasawa K, Hashimoto H (2010) Textbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modelling, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • 17.Khan HA (2005) Assessing poverty impact of trade liberalization policies: a generic macroeconomic computable general equilibrium model for South Asia. ADB Institute Discussion Paper, No. 22.
  • 18.List F (1841) The National System of Political Economy, Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincortt & Co.
  • 19.Lofgren H (2000) Exercises in General Equilibrium Modeling Using GAMS, Washington, D.C.: IFPRI.
  • 20.Lofgren H, Harris RL, Robinson S (2002) A Standard Computable General Equilibrum (CGE) Model in Gams, Washington, DC: IFPRI.
  • 21.Miller RE, Blair PD (2009). Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • 22.Mohammed T (2016) A CGE analysis of the economic impact of trade liberalization on the Algerian economy. Eur J Sustain Dev 5: 397–408.
  • 23.Pudjiastuti AQ, Anindita R, Hanani N, et al. (2013) Changes effect of sugar import tariff in Indonesia. Russ J Agr Soc Econ Sci 3: 31–38.
  • 24.Raihan S (2010) Welfare and poverty impacts of trade liberalization: a dynamic CGE microsimulation analysis. Int J Microsim 3: 123–126.
  • 25.Ricardo D (1951) The works and correspondence of David Ricardo, In: Sraffa P (Ed.): On the Principals of Political Economy and Taxation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 26.Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long run growth. J Polit Econ 94: 1002–1037.    
  • 27.Siddiqui R, Siddiqui R, Iqbal Z, et al. (1999) The impact of tariff reforms on income distribution in Pakistan: a CGE-based analysis. Pak Dev Rev 38: 789–804.    
  • 28.Siddiqui R, Iqbal Z (2001) Tariff reduction and functional income distribution in Pakistan: a CGE model. MIMAP Technical Paper Series, No. 10.
  • 29.Solow R (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70: 65–94.    
  • 30.Swan TW (1956) Economicgrowth and capital accumulation. Econ Rec 32: 334–361.    
  • 31.Telli Ç (2004) Sosyal hesaplar matrisi üretme yöntemi ve Türkiye uygulaması. Manuscr State Plann Organization Ankara.
  • 32.Yeldan AE (1987) Structural adjustment and trade in Turkey: a general equilibrium analysis of the export-led versus domestic demand-led strategies of development. Economic Development Center Bulletin, No. 87–7, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN.
  • 33.Young A (1991) Learning by doing and the dynamic effects of international trade. Q J Econ 106: 369–405.    


Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved