Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Investor reaction to economic sanctions: the case of Russian Global Depositary Receipts

Department of Accounting and Business Law, College of Business MH 150, Minnesota State University, Mankato, USA

Special Issues: Profiling asset holders

We examine the impact that the economic sanctions imposed by the Western community on the Russian economy in March 2014 have had on the pricing of Global Depositary Receipts (GDRs) traded in London. We document that following the first announcement of the imposition of sanctions, the returns of Russian GDRs increased in the case of both the Moscow Exchange and London listings, indicating an enhanced risk of trading with Russian securities. This effect was more pronounced in the case of London listings compared to local listings, which resulted in an overall decrease in the returns spread between the GDR and underlying home market shares. In contrast, we do not find evidence that imposition of sanctions affected turnover by volume of home or London-based GDR trades around the sanctions announcement, suggesting that investors did not pull out of Russian GDRs, but instead, reassessed investment risks associated with Russian securities. Last, our findings provide no evidence of a moderating impact on pricing of Russian GDRs by the two mechanisms that are expected to be indicative of enhanced (decreased) risks for GDRs, namely, state ownership (presence of foreign nationals on boards of directors). Our study contributes to the debate on the importance of complex assessment of outcomes of international sanctions on individual economies and firms.
  Article Metrics

Keywords asset pricing; economic sanctions; Global Depositary Receipts; London; Moscow Exchange

Citation: Oksana Kim. Investor reaction to economic sanctions: the case of Russian Global Depositary Receipts. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2019, 3(3): 425-439. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2019.3.425


  • 1.Alsayed H, McGroarty F (2012) Arbitrage and the law of one price in the market for American Depository Receipts. J Int Finan Markets Inst Money 22: 1258-1276.    
  • 2.Association of Independent Directors (2014) Available from: www.nand.ru/professional-information/news4656.
  • 3.Biglaiser G, Lektzian D (2011) The effects of sanctions of US foreign direct investment. Int Org 65: 531-551.    
  • 4.Blouin J, Hail L, Yetman M (2009) Capital gains taxes, pricing spreads, and arbitrage: Evidence from cross-listed firms in the U.S. Account Rev 84: 1321-1361.
  • 5.Brooking Institutions (2018) Available from: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/03/20/new-sanctions-on-russia-are-not-enough/.
  • 6.Crawford N, Klotz A (1999) How sanctions work: a framework for analysis, In How Sanctions Work: Lessons from South Africa, edited by Neta C. Crawford and Audie Klotz, New York: St. Martin's Press, 25-42.
  • 7.Doxey M (1983) International sanctions in theory and practice. Case West Reserve J Int Law 15: 273-288.
  • 8.Early B (2015) Busted sanctions: Explaining why economic sanctions fail, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • 9.Gagnon L, Karolyi G (2010) Multi-market trading and arbitrage. J Financ Econ 97: 53-80.    
  • 10.Hahn P, Lasfer M (2016) Impact of foreign directors on board meeting frequency. Int Rev Financ Anal 46: 295-308.    
  • 11.Harvard Business Review (2017) Available from: https://hbr.org/2017/05/navigating-the-complexities-of-doing-business-in-russia.
  • 12.Hufbauer G, Schott J, Elliott K (1985) Economic sanctions reconsidered: History and current policy, Washington: Institute for International Economics.
  • 13.Hufbauer G, Elliott K, Cyrus T, et al. (2019) US economic sanctions: Their impact on trade, jobs, and wages. Working paper.
  • 14.Kaempfer W, Lowenberg A (1988) The theory of international economic sanctions: A public choice approach. Am Econ Rev 78: 786-793.
  • 15.Kim O (2013) The global recognition strategy of blue chips of the Russian and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) markets. J Contemp Account Econ 9: 151-169.    
  • 16.Kim O (2016a) Market efficiency and arbitrage opportunities for Russian depositary receipts cross-listed on the London Stock Exchange. Rev Pac Basin Financ Mark Policies 19: 1-36.
  • 17.Kim O (2016b) The IFRS adoption reform through the lens of neoinstitutionalism: The case of the Russian Federation. Int J Account 51: 345-362.
  • 18.Kim O (2019a) The development and challenges of Russian corporate governance I, The roles and functions of boards of directors, Stuttgart: Ibidem Press.
  • 19.Kim O (2019b) Auditors' response to economic sanctions: The case of Russia. Working paper.
  • 20.Kim O, Pinnuck M (2014) Competition among exchanges through simplified disclosure requirements: Evidence from the American and Global Depositary Receipts. Account Bus Res 44: 1-40.    
  • 21.La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, et al. (2000) Investor protection and corporate governance. J Financ Econ 58: 3-27.    
  • 22.Li Q, Resnick A (2003) Reversal of fortunes: Democratic institutions and foreign direct investment inflows to developing countries. Int Org 57: 175-211.    
  • 23.London Stock Exchange (LSE) (2019) International Order Book trading statistics. Available from: https://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/statistics/daily-trading/daily-trading.html.
  • 24.Masulis R, Wang C, Xie F (2012) Globalization in the boardroom-the effects of foreign directors on corporate governance and firm performance. J Account Econ 53: 527-554.    
  • 25.McCarthy D, Puffer S, Satinsky D (2019) Will Russia have a role in the changing global economy? Contrasting Western and Russian cultural lenses. Cross Cult Strateg Manage.
  • 26.Moscow Exchange (2019) Trading platforms and listing requirements. Available from: https://www.moex.com/s1091.
  • 27.O'Donnell G (1978) Reflections on the patterns of change in the bureaucratic authoritarian state. Lat Am Res Rev 13: 3-38.
  • 28.Olson M (1993) Dictatorship, democracy, and development. Am Political Sci Rev 87: 567-576.    
  • 29.Patro D (2000) Return behavior and pricing of American Depositary Receipts. J Int Financ Markets Inst Money 9: 43-67.
  • 30.Ros Business Consulting (RBC) (2014) London is concerned: financial sanctions against Russian will not harm the city. Available from: https://www.rbc.ru/economics/24/03/2014/570419f99a794761c0ce8484.
  • 31.Ros Business Consulting (RBC) (2019) The archive of sanctions imposed on Russia. Available from: https://www.rbc.ru/story/5ac7778a9a79472666f0c00c.
  • 32.TASS (2018) Available from: https://tass.ru/ekonomika/5123157.
  • 33.Vedomosti (2016) Available from: https://www.vedomosti.ru/finance/articles/2016/03/22/634550-inostrannih-investorov.
  • 34.Washington Post (2014) There will be costs. Available from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2014/02/28/there-will-be-costs-text-of-obamas-statement-on-ukraine/?utm_term=.c564070b6a7f.


Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved