Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

The Price Concessions of High- and Low-Priced Housing in a Period of Financial Crisis

1 National University of Kaohsiung, No. 700, Kaohsiung University Rd., Nanzih District, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
2 Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, No. 1, Nan-Tai Street, Yungkang Dist., Tainan City 710, Taiwan

Special Issues: Financial Business Cycle

This study uses the data from the Taiwan housing market and three methods to estimate the liquidity of high- and low-priced housing markets. The first method in this study used quantile regressions to estimate the relationship between time on the market and final transaction price. The second method involved adding variables representing housing price characteristics to the quantile regression model to control the influence of other housing characteristics and estimate the relationship between time on the market and transaction price. Lastly, this study estimated the price concessions that individual sellers accept to realize an asset. All empirical results showed that lower housing prices imply higher liquidity costs in the final transaction, and the average rate of price concession for low-priced housing was greatest at approximately 7%. The results of this study demonstrate that in an emerging market with a significant divide between rich and poor, when a financial crisis occurs, the most vulnerable sellers of real estate are the poor. The government should pay particular attention to the liquidity of the low-priced housing market and provide adequate avenues of funding to low-income families, to prevent them from becoming the greatest losers in a period of financial crisis.
  Article Metrics


1. Anglin PM, Rutherford RC, Springer TM (2003) The Trade-off Between the Selling Price of Residential Properties and Time-on-the-Market: The Impact of Price Setting. J Real Estate Financ and Econ 26: 95-111.    

2. Asabere PK, Huffman FE (1993) Price Concession, Time on Market, and the Actual Sale Price of Homes. J Real Estate Financ and Econ 6: 167-174.

3. Bassett G, Chen HL (2001) Quantile Style: Return-Based Attribution Using Regression Quantiles. Empir Econ 26: 293-305.

4. Belkin J, Hempel DJ, Mcleavey DW (1976) An Empirical Study of Time on Market Using Multidimensional Segmentation of Housing Market. Are J 4: 57-75.

5. Buchinsky M (2001) Quantile Regression with Sample Selection: Estimating Women's Return to Education in the U.S. Empir Econ 26: 87-113.

6. Deaton A (1997) The Analysis of Household Surveys, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

7. Cubbin J (1974) Price, Quality, and Selling Time in the Housing Market. Appl Econ 6: 171-187.    

8. Ferreira EJ, Sirmans GS (1989) Selling Price, Financing Premiums, and Days on the Market. J Real Estate Financ and Econ 2: 209-222.    

9. Glower M, Haurin DR, Hendershott PH (1998) Selling Time and Selling Price: the Influence of Seller Motivation. Real Estate Econo 26: 719-740.    

10. Jud GD, Winkler DT, Kissling GE (1995) Price Spreads and Residential Housing Market Liquidity. J Real Estate Financ and Econ 11: 251-260.    

11. Kang HB, Gardner MJ (1989) Selling Price and Marketing Time in the Residential Real Estate Market. J Real Estate Res 4: 21-35.

12. Koenker R, Bassett G (1978) Regression Quantiles. Econometrica 46: 33-50.    

13. Koenker R, d'Orey V (1987) Computing Regression Quantiles. Appl Stat 36: 383-93.    

14. Larsen JE, Park WJ (1989) Non-Uniform Percentage Brokerage Commissions and Real Estate Market Performance. Areu J 17: 423-438.

15. Miller NG (1978) Time on the Market and Selling Price. Areu J 6: 164-174.    

16. Miller NG, Sklarz MA (1987) Pricing Strategies and Residential Property Selling Prices. J Real Estate Res 2: 31-40.

17. Rosen S (1974) Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition. J Politic Econ 82: 34-55.    

18. Springer TM (1996) Single-Family Housing Transaction: Seller Motivations, Price, and Marketing Time. J Real Estate Financ and Econ 13: 237-254.

19. Trippi R (1977) Estimating the Relationship Between Price and Time of Sale for Investment Property. Manag Sci 23: 832-842.

20. Yavas A, Yang SX (1995) Bigger Is Not Better: Brokerage and Time on the Market. J Real Estate Res 10: 23-33.

Copyright Info: © 2017, I-Chun Tsai, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved