Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Creativity, Comprehension, Conversation and the Hippocampal Region: New Data and Theory

1 Psychology Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563
2 Department of Psychology, Northland College, Wisconsin

Topical Section: Advances in Memory Theories

This article examines conceptual frameworks for explaining relations between creativity and the hippocampal region (HR) and reports two new experimental studies. In both studies, seventeen people participated in extensive face-to-face interviews: sixteen normal individuals and H.M., an amnesic with cerebellar and HR damage but virtually no neocortical damage. The results indicated that HR damage impairs aspects of everyday language comprehension and production that require creativity—defined as the ability to form new internal representations that satisfy relevant constraints for being useful or valuable in the real world. Study 1 demonstrated deficits in H.M.’s comprehension of creative but not routine aspects of the interviews—extending to the real world twelve prior demonstrations that H.M. understands routine but not novel aspects of experimentally constructed sentences, deficits that reflected his HR damage, but not his cerebellar damage, his explicit or declarative memory problems, inability to comprehend or recall the instructions, forgetting, poor visual acuity, motoric slowing, time pressure, deficits in visual scanning or attentional allocation, lack of motivation, and excessive memory load in the tasks. Study 2 demonstrated similar deficits in H.M.’s ability to produce creative but not routine aspects of conversational discourse, extending findings in five prior sentence production experiments to
real-world creativity. Both types of deficits impaired communication in the interviews, results that support some theories of creativity and the HR but not others.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

References

1. MacKay DG (2014) The engine of memory: Even after his death, the famous amnesic H.M. is revolutionizing our understanding of how memory works and how we maintain it as we age. Sci Am Mind 25: 30-38. Also available at http://mackay.bol.ucla.edu/publications.html.

2. Duff MC, Brown-Schmidt S (2012) The hippocampus and the flexible use and processing of language. Front Human Neurosci 6. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00069.

3. MacKay DG, James LE (2004) Sequencing, speech production, and selective effects of aging on phonological and morphological speech errors. Psychol Aging 19: 93-110.

4. Kaufman JC, Beghetto RA (2009) Beyond big and little: The Four C model of creativity. Rev General Psychol 13: 1-12.    

5. Boden MA (1990) The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Basic Books.

6. Amabile TM (1992) Growing up creative: Nurturing a lifetime of creativity. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation, Inc.

7. Csikzenmihalyi M (2013) Creativity: The psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, Inc.

8. Fritz R (1991) Creating: A guide to the creative process. New York: Fawsett Columbine.

9. Hennessey BA, Amabile TM (2010) Creativity. Ann Rev Psychol 61: 569-598.    

10. Puccio G (2012) Creativity rising: Creative thinking and creative problem solving in the 21st century. Buffalo, NY: ICSC Press.

11. Sawyer RK (2012) Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

12. Sternberg RJ, Lubart TI, Kaufman JC, et al. (2005) Creativity. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 351–370). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

13. Sullivan DM, Ford CM (2005) The relationship between novelty and value in the assessment of organizational creativity. Korean J Probl Solv 15: 117-131.

14. Weisberg RW (2006) Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention and the arts. Hobken, NY: Wiley.

15. Beghetto RA, Kaufman JC (2007) Toward a broader conception of creativity: a case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts 1: 73-79.

16. Runco MA (1996) Personal creativity: definition and developmental issues. New Dir Child Dev 72 (Summer): 3-30.

17. Runco MA (2004) Creativity. Annu Rev Psychol 55: 657-687.

18. Cohen LM (1989) A continuum of adaptive creative behaviors. Creat Res J 2: 169-183.    

19. Liu X, Ramirez S, Pang PT, et al. (2012) Optogenetic stimulation of a hippocampal engram activates fear memory recall. Nature 484: 381-385 doi:10.1038/nature11028.

20. MacKay DG (1987) The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. Berlin: Springer-Verlag (pp. 90–110). Also available at http://mackay.bol.ucla.edu/publications.html.

21. Plucker JA, Beghetto RA (2004) Why Creativity Is Domain General, Why It Looks Domain Specific, and Why the Distinction Does Not Matter. In Sternberg, Robert J. (Ed); Grigorenko, Elena L. (Ed); Singer, Jerome L. (Ed), Creativity: From potential to realization. , (pp. 153–167). Washington.

22. Moran S, John-Steiner V (2003) Creativity in the making: Vygotsky’s contemporary contribution to the dialectic of development and creativity. In R. K. Sawyer, V. John-Steiner, S. Moran, R. J., Sternberg, D. H. Feldman, J. Nakamura, et al., Creativity and development. (pp. 61–90). New York: Oxford University Press.

23. Sawyer RK, John-Steiner V, Moran S, et al. (2003) Creativity and development. New York: Oxford University Press.

24. Kaufmann G (2003) What to measure? A new look at the concept of creativity. Scand J Educ Res 47: 235-251.

25. Sedivy J (2014) Language in mind: An introduction to psycholinguistics. Sinauer Associates, Inc.: Sunderland, MA.

26. MacKay DG (1988) Under what conditions can theoretical psychology survive and prosper?: Integrating the rational and empirical epistemologies. Psycholog Rev 95: 559-565.

27. Annese J, NM Schenker-Ahmed, H Bartsch, et al. (2014) Postmortem examination of patient H.M.’s brain based on histological sectioning and digital 3D reconstruction. Nature Commu 5: 3122. doi:10.1038/ncomms4122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4122.

28. Corkin S, Amaral DG, González RG, et al. (1997) H.M.’s medial temporal lobe lesion: findings from magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 17: 3964-3979.

29. Salat DH, van der Kouwe AJW, Tuch DS, et al. (2006) Neuroimaging H.M.: A 10-year follow-up examination. Hippocampus 16: 936-945. doi:10.1002/hipo.20222.

30. MacKay DG, James LE (2001) The binding problem for syntax, semantics, and prosody: H.M.’s selective sentence-reading deficits under the theoretical-syndrome approach. Language Cognit Processes 16: 419-460.

31. MacKay DG, James LE, Taylor JK, et al. (2007) Amnesic H.M. exhibits parallel deficits and sparing in language and memory: Systems versus binding theory accounts. Language Cognit Processes 22: 377-452.

32. MacKay DG, Johnson LW (2013) Errors, error detection, error correction and hippocampal-region damage: Data and theories. Neuropsychologia 51: 2633-2650. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.08.009. Also available at http://mackay.bol.ucla.edu/publications.html. See especially the Supplemental materials for MacKay & Johnson (2013). Theories for explaining hippocampal-region involvement in error detection. Neuropsychologia: 2633-2650. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.08.009. Also available at http://mackay.bol.ucla.edu/publications.html.

33. Gabrieli JDE, Cohen NJ, Corkin S (1988) The impaired learning of semantic knowledge following bilateral medial temporal-lobe resection. Brain Cognition 7: 157-177.    

34. MacKay DG, James LE (2002) Aging, retrograde amnesia, and the binding problem for phonology and orthography: A longitudinal study of "hippocampal amnesic" H.M. Aging Neuropsychol Cognit 9: 298-333. doi:10.1076/anec.9.4.298.8774. Also available at http://mackay.bol.ucla.edu/publications.html.    

35. MacKay DG, James LE (2009) Visual cognition in amnesic H.M.: Selective deficits on the what’s-wrong-here and hidden-figure tasks. J Exper Clini Neuropsychol 31: 769-789. doi:10.1080/13803390802502606.

36. Addis DR, Pan L, Musicaro R, et al. (2016) Divergent thinking and constructing episodic simulations. Memory 24: 89-97.    

37. Benedek M, Jauk E, Fink A, et al. (2014) To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas. NeuroImage 88: 125-133.

38. Addis DR, Schacter DL (2011) The hippocampus and imagining the future: Where do we stand? Front Human Neurosci 5: 173. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00173.

39. Buckner RL, Carroll DC (2007) Self-projection and the brain. Trends Cognit Sci 11: 49-57.

40. Duff MC, Hengst J, Tranel D, et al. (2009) Hippocampal amnesia disrupts verbal play and the creative use of language in social interaction. Aphasiology 23: 926-939.    

41. Hassabis D, Kumaran D, Vann SD, et al. (2007) Patients with hippocampal amnesia cannot imagine new experiences. Proceed Nation Aca Sci 104: 1726-1731.

42. Heyman K (2007) Hippocampal cells help rats think ahead. Sci 318: 900.

43. Johnson A, Redish AD (2007) Neural ensembles in CA3 transiently encode paths forward of the animal at a decision point. J Neurosci 27: 12176-12189.

44. Maguire EA, Hassabis D (2011) Role of the hippocampus in imagination and future thinking. Proceed National Aca Sci USA 108: E39. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018876108.

45. Miller G (2007) A surprising connection between memory and imagination. Science 315: 312.

46. Schacter DL, Addis DR, Buckner RL (2007) Remembering the past to imagine the future: The prospective brain. Nature Rev Neurosci 8: 657-661.

47. Sheldon S, McAndrews MP, Moscovitch M (2011) Episodic memory processes mediated by the medial temporal lobes contribute to open-ended problem solving. Neuropsychologia 49: 2439-2447.

48. Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

49. Shafto M, MacKay DG (2000) The Moses, Mega-Moses and Armstrong illusions: Integrating language comprehension and semantic memory. Psycholog Sci 11: 372-378.

50. Shafto MA, MacKay DG (2010) Miscomprehension, meaning and phonology: The unknown and phonological Armstrong illusions. European J Cognit Psychol 22: 529-568.

51. MacKay DG, Hadley C (2009) Supra-normal age-linked retrograde amnesia: Lessons from an older amnesic (H.M.). Hippocampus 19: 424-445. doi:10.1002/hipo.20531. Also available at http://mackay.bol.ucla.edu/publications.html.    

52. James LE, Burke DM, Austin A, et al. (1998) Production and perception of verbosity in young and older adults. Psychol Aging 13: 355-367

53. Duff MC, Hengst J, Tengshe C, et al. (2008) Hippocampal amnesia disrupts the flexible use of procedural discourse in social interaction. Aphasiology 22: 1-15.

54. Duff MC, Hengst J, Tranel D, et al. (2006) Development of shared information in communication despite hippocampal amnesia. Nature Neurosci 9: 140-146.    

55. Carmichael L, Hogan HP, Walter AA (1932) An experimental study of the effect of language on the reproduction of visually perceived form. J Exper Psychology 15: 73-86.

56. Bayley PJ, Squire LR (2002) Medial temporal lobe amnesia: Gradual acquisition of factual information by nondeclarative memory. J Neurosci 22: 5741-8574.

57. Brown GDA, Della Sala S, Foster JK, et al. (2007) Amnesia, rehearsal, and temporal distinctiveness models of recall. Psychon Bulletin Rev 14: 256-260.

58. Huppert FA, Piercy M (1978) Dissociation between learning and remembering in organic amnesia. Nature 275: 317-318.    

59. Keane MM, Gabrieli JDE, Monti LA, et al. (1997) Intact and impaired conceptual memory processes in amnesia. Neuropsychology 11: 59-69.    

60. Keane MM, Gabrieli JDE, Mapstone HC, et al. (1995) Double dissociation of memory capacities after bilateral occipital-lobe or medial temporal-lobe lesions. Brain 118: 1129-4118.    

61. MacKay DG, Johnson LW, Fazel V, et al. (2013) Compensating for language deficits in amnesia I: H.M.’s spared retrieval categories. Brain Sci 3: 262-293. doi:10.3390/brainsci 3010262. Also available at http://mackay.bol.ucla.edu/publications.html.

62. MacKay DG, Johnson LW, Hadley C (2013) Compensating for language deficits in amnesia II: H.M.’s spared versus impaired encoding categories. Brain Sci 3: 415-459. doi:10.3390/brainsci3020415. Also available at http://mackay.bol.ucla.edu/publications.html.

63. Skotko BG, Kensinger EA, Locascio JJ, et al. (2004) Puzzling thoughts for H.M.: Can new semantic information be anchored to old semantic memories? Neuropsychology 18: 756-769.

64. Spiers HJ, Maguire EA, Burgess N (2001) Hippocampal amnesia. Neurocase 7: 357-382.    

65. Strauss ME, Weingartner H, Thompson K (1985) Remembering words and how often they occurred in memory-impaired patients. Memory Cognit 13: 507-510.    

66. Verfaellie M, Rajaram S, Fossum K, et al. (2008) Not all repetition is alike: Different benefits of repetition in amnesia and normal memory. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 14: 365-372.    

67. Weingartner H, Eckardt M, Grafman J, et al. (1993) The effects of repetition on memory performance in cognitively impaired patients. Neuropsychology 7: 385-395.    

68. Duff MC, Kurczek J, Rubin R, et al. (2013) Hippocampal amnesia disrupts creative thinking. Hippocampus 23: 1143-1149.

69. Duncan K, Ketz N, Inati S, et al. (2012) Evidence for area CA1 as a match/mismatch detector: A high-resolution fMRI study of the human hippocampus. Hippocampus 22: 389-398.    

70. Halgren E, Marinkovic K (1995) Neurophysiological networks integrating human emotions. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.). The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1137–1151). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

71. Knight RT (1996) Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection. Nature 383: 256-259. doi:10.1038/383256a0.    

72. Kumaran D, Maguire EA (2007) Match-mismatch processes underlie hippocampal responses to novelty. J Neurosci 27: 8517-8524.    

73. Miller EK, Li L, Desimone R (1991) A neural mechanism for working and recognition memory in inferior temporal cortex. Science 254: 1377-1380. doi:10.1126/science.1962197.

74. Rolls ET, Cahusac PMB, Feigenbaum JD, et al. (1993) Responses of single neurons in the hippocampus of the macaque related to recognition memory. Exper Brain Res 93: 299-306. doi:10.1007/BF00228398.

75. Tulving E, Habib R, Nyberg L, et al. (1999) Positron emission tomography correlations in and beyond the medial temporal lobes. Hippocampus 9: 71-82. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1999)9:1<71::AID-HIPO8>3.0.CO;2-F.

76. Knight RT, Scabini D (1998) Anatomic bases of event-related potentials and their relationship to novelty detection in humans. J Clin Neurophysiol 15: 3-13. doi:10.1097/00004691-199801000-00003.    

77. MacKay DG, Burke DM, Stewart R (1998) H.M.’s language production deficits: Implications for relations between memory, semantic binding, and the hippocampal system. J Memory Language 38: 28-69. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2544.

78. MacKay DG (1990) Perception, action, and awareness: A three-body problem. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between Perception and Action (pp. 269-303). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

79. Maguire EA (2001) "Neuroimaging studies of autobiographical event memory". Philosophical Transact Royal Soc B: Biolog Sci 356: 1441-1451. doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0944

80. Ferreira VS, Bock K, Wilson M, et al. (2008) Memory for syntax despite amnesia. Psycholog Sci 19: 940-946.    

81. MacKay DG (1972) The search for ambiguity by an amnesic patient: Implications for the theory of comprehension, memory and attention. Unpublished manuscript, Psychology Dept., University of California Los Angeles. Also available at http://mackay.bol.ucla.edu/publications.html.

82. Sawyer K (2011) The cognitive neuroscience of creativity: A critical review. Creat Res J 23: 137-154.

83. MacKay DG, James LE, Hadley C, et al. (2011) Speech errors of amnesic H.M.: Unlike everyday slips-of-the-tongue. Cortex 47: 377-408. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.05.009. Also available at http://mackay.bol.ucla.edu/publications.html.

84. Ramachandran VS (2004) A brief tour of human consciousness: From impostor poodles to purple numbers. New York: Pearson Education.

85. Stowe LA, Paans AMJ, Wijers AA, et al. (2004) Activations of 'motor' and other non-language structures during sentence comprehension. Brain Language 89: 290-299. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00359-6.

86. MacKay DG, Stewart R, Burke DM (1998) H.M. revisited: Relations between language comprehension, memory, and the hippocampal system. J Cognit Neurosci 10: 377-394. doi:10.1162/089892998562807. Also available at http://mackay.bol.ucla.edu/publications.html.

87. Ivry RB, Keele SW (1989) Timing functions of the cerebellum. J Cognit Neurosci 1: 136-152. doi:10.1162/jocn.1989.1.2.136.    

88. Lackner JR (1974) Observations on the speech processing capabilities of an amnesic patient: Several aspects of H.M.'s language function. Neuropsychologia 12: 199-207. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(74)90005-0.

89. Zaidel DW, Zaidel E, Oxbury SM, et al. (1995) The interpretation of sentence ambiguity in patients with unilateral focal brain surgery. Brain Language 51: 458-468. doi:10.1006/brln.1995.1071.    

90. Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

91. Wiig EH, Secord W (1988) Test of language competence: Expanded edition. New York: The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, Inc.

92. Guediche S, Ben-Yehuda G, Fiez JA (2011) Cerebellum. In P. C. Hogan (Ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences (pp. 148-150). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

93. Marslen-Wilson W (1970) Biographical interviews with H.M. M.I.T., Cambridge, MA: Transcript retrieved from www.mackay.bol.ucla.edu.

94. Barense MD, Gaffan D, Graham KS (2007) The human medial temporal lobe processes online representations of complex objects. Neuropsychologia 45: 2963-2297.    

95. Hannula D, Tranel D, Cohen NJ (2006) The long and the short of it: relational memory impairments in amnesia, even at short lags. J Neurosci 26: 8352-8259.

96. Olson IR, Moore KS, Stark M, et al. (2006) Visual working memory is impaired when the medial temporal lobe is damaged. J Cognit Neurosci 18: 1087-1097. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1087.    

97. Ranganath C, D’Esposito M (2001) Medial temporal lobe activity associated with active maintenance of novel information. Neuron 31: 865-873.    

98. Warren DE, Duff MC, Tranel D, et al. (2010) Medial temporal lobe damage impairs representation of simple stimuli. Front Human Neurosci 4. Doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00035.

99. MacKay DG, James LE, Hadley CB (2008) Amnesic H.M.’s performance on the language competence test: Parallel deficits in memory and sentence production. J Clin Exper Neuropsychol 30: 280-300.

Copyright Info: © 2016, Donald G. MacKay, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved