Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Debating New Theory in Neuroscience

1 Department of Psychology at Bon Secours St. Francis Hospital, Greenville, SC.USA;
2 Rutgers State University, Center for Computational & Integrative Biology, 315 Penn St, Camden, NJ 08102 USA

  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

Citation: Robert A Moss, Joseph V Martin. Debating New Theory in Neuroscience. AIMS Neuroscience, 2014, 1(1): 1-3. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2014.1.1

References

  • 1. Rabesandratana T. (2013). The seer of science publishing. Science 342: 66-67.    
  • 2. Miller G. A. (2010). Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain. Perspect Psychol Sci 5:716–743. DOI: 10. 1177/1745691610388774.
  • 3. Wang D, Song C, & Barabasi AL. (2013). Quantifying long-term scientific impact. Science 342:127-132. DOI: 10. 1126/science. 1237825.    
  • 4. Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer S, & Jones J. (2013). Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science, 342: 468-472. DOI: 10. 1126/science. 1240474.    

 

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

Copyright Info: 2014, Robert A Moss, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved