Green Finance, 2020, 2(2): 151-172. doi: 10.3934/GF.2020009.

Research article Special Issues

Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Mapping the evolving complexity of large hydropower project finance in low and lower-middle income countries

1 University of Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership (CISL), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
2 Centre for Crisis Studies & Mitigation, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Special Issues: Finance and Sustainability

The structure and key actors in large hydropower project financing has changed considerably over the past 50 years, particularly in low and lower-middle income countries (LICs and L-MICs). Exclusively public projects, typically financed by the host country government with support from multilateral development banks (MDBs), have become less common, while public-private-partnerships (PPPs) and new forms of bilateral finance arrangements have become more prevalent. However, fully privately financed projects with no public or MDB finance remain unusual in large hydropower projects. This paper traces the evolution and complexity of hydropower financing in LICs and L-MICs from the early 1970s to the present day, showing how the types and roles of various actors have changed over time and how new types of financing packages have surfaced to meet the growing need for large energy infrastructure projects. Examples from various LICs and L-MICS are used to describe the features of three of the most commonly used models of hydropower project financing: fully public finance, PPPs, and new bilateral finance. Comparative assessment of the key characteristics of different financing models and their strengths and limitations is provided to enable LICs and L-MICs to make informed choices over the allocation of their scarce financing resources in their struggle to balance urgent development needs with long-term sustainability objectives and economic impacts.
  Article Metrics

Keywords hydropower; project finance; developing countries; sustainable development; risk; sustainability

Citation: Sanna Markkanen, Judith Plummer Braeckman, Pon Souvannaseng. Mapping the evolving complexity of large hydropower project finance in low and lower-middle income countries. Green Finance, 2020, 2(2): 151-172. doi: 10.3934/GF.2020009


  • 1. AfDB (2019) Bujagali Interconnection Project-project completion report. Available from:
  • 2. African Energy (2018) Cameroon: Africa50 and Stoa acquire stakes in Nachtigal. Available from:
  • 3. Alam F, Alam Q, Reza S, et al. (2017) A review of hydropower projects in Nepal. Energy Procedia, 581-585.
  • 4. Authority BP [BPA] (2011) Leaflet describing the Bui hydropower project, background and proposed benefits, Accra: Bui Power Authority.
  • 5. Bitexco Power (2016) Investment signing ceremony. Available from: 113.html.
  • 6. Blimpo MP, Cosgrove-Davies M (2019) Electricity Access in Sub-Saharan Africa: Uptake, Reliability, and Complementary Factors for Economic Impact, Washington DC: World Bank.
  • 7. Bottelier P (2007) China and the World Bank: how a partnership was built. J Contemp China 16: 239-258.    
  • 8. Briscoe J (1999) The financing of hydropower, irrigation and water supply infrastructure in developing countries. Int J Water Resour Dev 15: 459-491.    
  • 9. Bräutigam D (2011) Aid "with Chinese characteristics": Chinese foreign aid and development finance meet the OECD-DAC aid regime. J Int Dev 23: 752-764.    
  • 10. Centre for Public Impact (2017) The Bujagali Dam Project in Uganda. Available from:
  • 11. Chen W, Dollar D, Tang H (2016) Why is China investing in Africa? Evidence from the firm level. World Bank Econ Rev 32: 610-632.
  • 12. Cheng D, Shi X, Yu J (2020) The impact of the green energy infrastructure on firm productivity: evidence from the three gorges project in the people's republic of china. ADBI Working Paper No.1075, February 2020. Available from:
  • 13. China Exim Bank (2016) White Paper on Green Finance. Available from:
  • 14. Corfee-Morlot J, Parks P, Ogunleye J (2019) Achieving Clean Energy Access in Sub-Saharan Africa. Available from:
  • 15. Dreher A, Fuchs A, Parks BC, et al. (2017) Aid, China, and Growth: Evidence from a New Global Development Finance Dataset. AidData Working Paper #46. Williamsburg VA: AidData.
  • 16. Eberhard A, Gratwick K, Morella E, et al. (2016) Independent Power Projects in Sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons from Five Key Countries, Washington DC: World Bank.
  • 17. Equator Principles (2013) Equator Principles. Available from:
  • 18. Gallagher K (2018) China's global energy finance, Boston: Global Development Policy Center, Boston University.
  • 19. Gugler P, Shi J (2009) Corporate social responsibility for developing country multinational corporations: Lost war in pertaining global competitiveness. J Bus Ethics 87: 3-24.    
  • 20. Hausermann H (2018) "Ghana must Progress, but we are Really Suffering": Bui Dam, Antipolitics Development, and the Livelihood Implications for Rural People. Society Natural Resour 31: 633-648.    
  • 21. Heiser W, Liu I, Sachdev KBS (2018) Chinese financing options for Southeast Asian hydropower projects. Int J Hydropower Dams 25: 40-44.
  • 22. Hensengerth O (2011) Interaction of Chinese institutions with host governments in dam construction: the Bui Dam in Ghana. Available from:
  • 23. Hensengerth O (2013) Chinese hydropower companies and environmental norms in countries of the global South: the involvement of Sinohydro in Ghana's Bui Dam. Environ Dev Sustain 15: 285-300.    
  • 24. HSA (2019) Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Guidelines and Protocols. Available from:
  • 25. ICOLD (2011) Constitution status. Available from:
  • 26. IEA (2018) International Energy Agency statistics. Available from:
  • 27. IEA (2017) Southeast Asia energy outlook 2017. Available from:
  • 28. IEA-ETSAP IRENA (2015) Hydropower Technology Brief. Technology Brief E06. Available from:
  • 29. IFC (2015) Hydroelectric Power: A Guide for Developers and Investors. Available from:
  • 30. IFC (2017) Blended finance at IFC. Available from:
  • 31. IFC (2018) Pioneering responsible business standards: The Equator Principles at 15. Available from: .
  • 32. IHA (2015) Sustainable Development Goals: how does hydropower fit in? Available from:
  • 33. Ingram E (2018) EDF, IFC, Republic of Cameroon sign agreements to build 420-MW Nachtigal hydropower plant. Hydro Rev, 11.
  • 34. IRENA (2019) Renewable capacity highlights. Available from:
  • 35. Kirchherr J, Matthews N, Charles KJ, et al. (2017) "Learning it the hard way": social safeguards norms in Chinese-led dam projects in Myanmar, Laos and Cambodia. Energy Policy 102: 529-539.    
  • 36. Le L (2017) Building Hydropower Plants in Uganda: Who is the Best Partner? Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University and Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. Available from:
  • 37. Locher H, Hermansen GY, Johannesson GA, et al. (2010) Initiatives in the hydro sector post-World Commission on Dams-the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Forum. Water Altern 3: 43-57.
  • 38. Markkanen S, Plummer Braeckman J (2019) Financing Sustainable Hydropower Projects in Emerging Markets: An Introduction to Concepts and Terminology. FutureDAMS Working Paper 003. Manchester: The University of Manchester.
  • 39. Merme V, Ahlers R, Gupta J (2014) Private equity, public affair: Hydropower financing in the Mekong Basin. Global Environ Change 24: 20-29.    
  • 40. Meyer R, Eberhard A, Gratwick K (2018) Uganda's power sector reform: there and back again? Energy Sustainable Dev 43: 75-89.    
  • 41. MIGA (2018) Nachtigal Hydro IPP. Available from:
  • 42. Mott MacDonald (2009) Enhancing Development Benefits to Local Communities from Hydropower Projects: A Literature Review. Available from:
  • 43. Obour P, Owusu K, Agyeman EA, et al. (2016) The impacts of dams on local livelihoods: a study of the Bui Hydroelectric Project in Ghana. Int J Water Resour Dev 32: 286-300.    
  • 44. Overseas Development Institute (ODI) (2016) Age of Choice: Uganda in the New Development Finance Landscape. Available from:
  • 45. Oud E (2002) The evolving context for hydropower development. Energy Policy 30: 1215-1223.    
  • 46. Pepermans G, Driesen J, Haeseldonckx D, et al. (2005) Distributed generation: definition, benefits and issues. Energy Policy 33: 787-798.    
  • 47. Plummer J (2013) Assessing the effects of pre-construction delay in hydropower projects. PhD Thesis. Cambridge: Department of Engineering, Centre for Sustainable Development, University of Cambridge.
  • 48. Plummer Braeckman J, Disselhoff T, Kirchherr J (2019) Cost and schedule overruns in large hydropower dams: an assessment of projects completed since 2000. Int J Water Resour Dev, 1-16.
  • 49. Poindexter G (2017) CTGC begins construction on the 16-GW Baihetan hydropower station in Southwest China. Hydroworld 8/2017. Available from:
  • 50. Porter IC, Shivakumar J (eds) (2010) Doing a Dam Better: The Lao People's Democratic Republic and the Story of Nam Theun 2, Washington DC: World Bank.
  • 51. Tirpak D, Adams H (2008) Bilateral and multilateral financial assistance for the energy sector of developing countries. Climate Policy 8: 135-151.    
  • 52. WEF-World Economic Forum (2020) The argument for suspending debt payments for emerging economies throughout the pandemic. Available from:
  • 53. World Bank (1961) Report to the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development-Uganda Electricity Board Project. Available from:
  • 54. World Bank (1962) Report and recommendations of the President to the Executive directors on a proposed development credit to India for the second Koyna power project. Available from:
  • 55. World Bank (1973) Appraisal of Kafue Hydropower Project stage II, Zambia. World Bank staff appraisal report, 7 May 1973. Available from:
  • 56. World Bank (1977) Report and Recommendation of the President of the International Development Association and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development to the Executive Directors on a proposed credit and proposed loans to the Republic of Malawi for a Third Power Project. Available from:
  • 57. World Bank (2005) Project appraisal report for Nam Theun II, Laos PDR. Available from:
  • 58. World Bank Group (2014) Supporting Hydropower: An Overview of the World Bank Group's Engagement. Available from:
  • 59. World Bank (2017a) State of Electricity Access Report 2017. Available from:
  • 60. World Bank (2017b) Maximizing Finance for Development (MFD). Available from:
  • 61. World Bank (2018) Cameroon: World Bank Group helps boost hydropower capacity. Press release. Available from:
  • 62. World Bank and IEA (2015) Progress toward Sustainable Energy 2015. Available from:
  • 63. World Energy Council (2015) World Energy Resources: Charting the Upsurge in Hydropower Development 2015. Available from:
  • 64. Yankson P, Asiedu A, Owusu K, et al. (2018) The livelihood challenges of resettled communities of the Bui dam project in Ghana and the role of Chinese dam-builders. Dev Policy Rev 36: O476-O494.    
  • 65. Zimny J, Michalak P, Bielik S, et al. (2013) Directions in development of hydropower in the world, in Europe and Poland in the period 1995-2011. Renew Sust Energy Rev 21: 117-130.    


This article has been cited by

  • 1. Piotr F. Borowski, Nexus between water, energy, food and climate change as challenges facing the modern global, European and Polish economy, AIMS Geosciences, 2020, 6, 4, 397, 10.3934/geosci.2020022

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved