Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Financing of the global shift to renewable energy and energy efficiency

University of Twente and Sustainable Innovations Academy, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Special Issues: Energy Finance

A global shift to low-carbon economies needs five times larger annual investments in renewable energy and energy efficiency compared to the present USD2005 200 billion. The question about how to finance those large investments is discussed with particular attention to the citizens’ savings because they are hardly used so far, except a few countries. If good conditions are created, activation of these savings is sufficiently large and it is rewarding regarding the cost-reducing technological change and many civil initiatives. High international prices of fossil fuels create favorable conditions but they are unpredictable whilst the present policy support for energy business and CO2 taxes do not compensate for the low prices. High CO2 taxes could do but meet opposition. Innovations in the USA and EU add value to the energy businesses by USD2005 9.2 billion a year based on average during 2005–2015, which exceeds their R&D on renewable energy and energy efficiency. Innovations in energy business also generate spin-off that exceeds 1% of the global GDP though the spin-off strongly varies across countries. The value addition motivates the supply-oriented and demand-oriented policy support for those energy innovations, in particular subsidies and price guarantees, respectively. Experiences with the subsidies in the USA compared to the price guarantees in the EU show that the latter involved larger expenditures but generated many more new firms and jobs per USD2005. A price guarantee per CO2 would invoke distributed energy systems entailing higher more energy-efficiency and energy security. Innovations generate adaptations when applied on larger scale. Their cost-reduction is function of scale; the projectable cost-reduction reduces the financial risks. Estimates show that the global investments in wind and solar power are efficiently allocated and operations are cost-effective. In addition to the power generation, those renewable energy with storage technologies deliver co-benefits to the energy producers and consumers and business models emerge tuned to the local conditions. The citizens’ participations in energy-efficiency and renewable energy would be enhanced if policies guarantee the annual value of the participants’ savings. Such guarantee would generate tax returns due to more companies and higher value of assets. The citizens participation with policy support enables the global shift to sustainable energy.
  Article Metrics


1. Bertoldi P, Boza-Kiss B (2017) Analysis of barriers and drivers for the development of the ESCO markets in Europe. Energy Policy 107: 345–355.    

2. BNEF/Frankfurt School-UNEP Centre (2018) Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2018. Available from: http://www.fs-unep-centre.org (Frankfurt am Main), accessed 5-6-2019.

3. Coady D, Parry I, Sears I, et al. (2015) How Large are Global Subsidies, International Monetary Fund, WP15/105, New York, USA.

4. Enerdata (2019) Available from: https://www.enerdata.net/publications/executive-briefing/world-energy-expenditures.html, accessed 8-82019.

5. Ermen van R (2007) Comparison and Assessment of Funding Schemes for Development of New Activities and Investments in Environmental Technologies, (Fundetec, rapport number 044370).

6. EU (2019) Available from: https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/ise/en/documents/publications/studies/EN2018_Fraunhofer-ISE_LCOE_Renewable_Energy_Technologies.pdf (accessed 1--2019).

7. Farmer JD, Lafond F (2016) How predictable is technological progress?. Res Policy 45: 647–665.    

8. Grubler A (2012) Energy transitions research: Insights and cautionary tales. Energy Policy 50: 8–16.    

9. Grigoli F, Herman A, Schmidt-Hebbel K (2014) World Saving, IMF, WP/14/204, Washington.

10. Haas R, Panzer C, Resch G, et al. (2011) A historical review of promotion strategies for electricity from renewable energy sources in EU countries. Renew Sust Energy Rev 15: 1003–1034.    

11. Herman R, Ardekanin SA, Ausubel JH (1989) Dematerialization, in Ausubel JH, Sladovich HE (eds.), Technology and Environment, 1st Edition, National Academy Press, Washington DC, 50–69.

12. IEA (2017) Emission factors are: 3.80 ton CO2 per ton coal, 2.53 ton CO2 per ton oil and 2.16 ton CO2 per ton oil equivalent of gas based on IEA estimates. Available from: http://www.iea.org/bookshop/729-CO2_Emission_from_Fuel_Combustion, accessed 26-7-2017.

13. IEA (2019) databased, International Energy Agency. Available from: https://www.iea.org/classicstats/statisticssearch/.

14. IEA/OECD (2019) Available from: https://www.oecd.org/site/tadffss/data/; http://www.iea.org/weo2017.

15. India (2019) Available from: https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/08/f25/LCOE.pdf (accessed 1-7-.2019).

16. Interreg (2019) Renewable Energy Communities Policy brief Interreg Europe. Available from: https://www.interregeurope.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/plp_uploads/policy_briefs/2018-08-30_Policy_brief_Renewable_Energy_Communities_PB_TO4_final.pdf.

17. IRENA (2018) Global Energy Transformation: A roadmap to 2050. Int Renew Energy Agency: Abu Dhabi.

18. Jager de D, Klessmann C, Stricker E, et al. (2011) Financing Renewable Energy in the European Energy Market. Report for the European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy.

19. Keen M, Parry II, Davies M, et al. (2019) Fiscal policies for Paris Climate Change Strategies-From Principle to Practices, International Monetary Fund, Washington.

20. Krlev G, Münscher R, Mülbert K (2013) Social Return on Investment (SROI): State–of-the-art and Perspectives. Centre for Social Investment, University of Heidelberg, Available from: http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/18758.

21. Krozer Y (2008) Innovations and the Environment, Springer, London, Chapter 3.

22. Krozer Y (2012) Renewable energy in European regions. Int J Innovation Reg Dev 4: 44–59.    

23. Krozer Y (2015a) Sustainable Investors and Innovators, in Krozer Y., Theories and Practices on Innovating for Sustainable Development, Chapter 10, Springer, Dordrecht-Heidelberg.

24. Krozer Y (2015b) Renewable energy business and policy, in Krozer Y., Theories and Practices on Innovating for Sustainable Development, Chapter 12, Springer, Dordrecht-Heidelberg.

25. Krozer Y (2019) Valorisation of energy services: essay on the value addition due to renewable energy. Energy Sustainability Society 9: 1–16

26. Lagarde C, Gaspar V (2019) Getting Real on Meeting Paris Climate Change Commitments, IMF blog May 3, 2019. Available from: https://blogs.imf.org/2019/05/03/getting-real-on-meeting-paris-climate-change-commitments/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery.

27. Lazard's (2017) Available from: https://www.lazard.com/perspective/levelized-cost-of-energy-2017/ and Lazard's Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis-version 12, Available from: https://www.lazard.com/media/450784/lazards-levelized-cost-of-energy-version-120-vfinal.pdf.

28. Mazzucato M, Semaniuk G (2018) Financing renewable energy: Who is financing what and why it matters. Technol Forecasting Social Change 127: 8–22.    

29. McVeigh J, Butraw D, Darmstadter J, et al. (1999) Winner, Loser or Innocent Victim? Has Renewable Energy Performed As Expected, Resources for the Future, Washington.

30. Morriss AP, Meiners RE (2016) Competition in Global Oil Markets: A Meta-Analysis and Review. Available from: http://secureenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/SAFE_Competition-in-Global-Oil-Markets-A-Meta-Analysis-and-Review.pdf.

31. OECD (2019a) Available from: http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/topics/income/.

32. OECD (2019b) Available from: https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?DatasetCode=POP_FIVE_HIST.

33. Oji C, Soumonni O, Ojah K (2016) Financing renewable energy projects for sustainable economic development in Africa. Energy Procedia 93: 113–119.    

34. REN21 (2017) Renewables 2017 Global Status Report, Paris Ren Secretariate.

35. Rosenberg N (1973) Innovative responses to material shortages, Am Econ Rev 63: 111–118, reprint in R. Dorfman, N.S. Dorfman (1977) Economics of the Environment, W.W. Norton & Company Inc., New York, 390–399.

36. Rubin ES, Azevedo IML, Jaramillo P, et al. (2015) A Review of learning rates for electricity supply technologies. Energy Policy 86: 198–218.    

37. Schumpeter JA (1935, 1989) Business Cycles, Porcupine Press, Philadelphia, 59.

38. Schumpeter JA (1935) Business Cycles, Porcupine Press, 4th edition, 1989, Philadelphia.

39. Sovacool BK (2016) How long will it take, Conceptualizing the temporary dynamics of energy transition. Energy Res Social Sci 13: 202–215.    

40. Shafiee S, Topal E (2010) A long term view on fossil fuel prices. Appl Energy 87: 988–1000.    

41. Tyl B, Lizarralde I (2017) The Citizen Funding: an alternative to finance renewable energy projects. Procedia CIRP 64: 199–204.    

42. Yildiz Ö (2014) Financing renewable energy infrastructures via financial citizen participation-The case of Germany. Renew Energy 68: 677–685.    

43. Unit costs (2018) Available from: https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2018/Jan/IRENA_2017_Power_Costs_2018.pdf.

44. US (2019) Available from: https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/electricity_generation.pdf.

45. WEC (2019) Available from: https://wec-indicators.enerdata.net/primary-energy-intensity.html.

46. World Bank, gross savings based on. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator.

© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved