Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Thermoplastic magnetic elastomer for fused filament fabrication

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, MN 55105, USA

Special Issues: Magnetic Responsive Soft Materials

Magnetorheological elastomers (MREs) are unique smart materials of high elasticity and magnetic susceptibility. MREs are prominent for the high degree of mechanical deformation or changes in stiffness that can be induced by applying magnetic fields. While most MREs are made with thermoset elastomers, this research focuses on the development and testing of a thermoplastic magnetic elastomer for potential use as fused filament fabrication (FFF) filament. FFF, also known as 3D printing, is an additive manufacturing technique that consists of 1D viscous thermoplastic extrusions that create 2D layers that build up to a 3D part. This method of creating parts produces underlying anisotropies which can be tuned to control the properties of the final part. Our thermoplastic magnetic elastomer was created utilizing solvent casting techniques to disperse isotropic magnetic particulate within a thermoplastic polyurethane matrix. Samples were created spanning two different magnetic particulate types (<150 µm iron (Fe) & 2–4 µm magnetite (Fe3O4)) and each with three different particulate loadings (20, 30, 40 wt%). The material was then extruded into FFF filaments with a Filastruder. Mechanical stress vs. strain curves of the extruded filaments were obtained using an MTS tensile tester. Magnetic hysteresis loops were acquired with a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). The analogous pure polyurethane filaments were also extruded and tested as a control. Our testing indeed shows that altering the magnetic particulate type and weight percentage impacts both the magnetic and mechanical properties of the overall material. In general, the filament samples with iron particulate had higher diametric consistency and were more compliant than those with magnetite particulate. Additionally, samples with magnetite had higher magnetic susceptibility and coercivity but lower saturation magnetization than those with iron. Lastly, increasing particulate percentage increases both the mechanical stiffness and saturation magnetization of the samples, as expected.
  Article Metrics

Keywords thermoplastic elastomer; magnetic elastomer; filament extrusion; mechanical properties; magnetic properties

Citation: Andrew H. Morgenstern, Thomas M. Calascione, Nathan A. Fischer, Thomas J. Lee, John E. Wentz, Brittany B. Nelson-Cheeseman. Thermoplastic magnetic elastomer for fused filament fabrication. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(3): 363-376. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.3.363


  • 1. Rafique M, Kandare E, Sprenger S (2017) Fiber-reinforced magneto-polymer matrix composites (FR–MPMCs)-A review. J Mater Res 32: 1020–1046.    
  • 2. Yang L, Martin L, Staiculescu D, et al. (2008) A novel flexible magnetic composite material for RFID, wearable RF and bio-monitoring applications. 2008 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest 2008: 963–966.
  • 3. Thévenot J, Oliveira H, Sandre O, et al. (2013) Magnetic responsive polymer composite materials. Chem Soc Rev 42: 7099–7116.    
  • 4. Evans B, Fiser B, Prins W, et al. (2012) A highly tunable silicone-based magnetic elastomer with nanoscale homogeneity. J Magn Magn Mater 324: 501–507.    
  • 5. Carlson J, Jolly M (2000) MR fluid, foam and elastomer devices. Mechatronics 10: 555–569.    
  • 6. Schmauch M, Mishra S, Evans B, et al. (2017) Chained iron microparticles for directionally controlled actuation of soft robots. ACS Appl Mater Inter 9: 11895–11901.    
  • 7. Ubaidillah, Sutrisno J, Purwanto A, et al. (2015) Recent progress on magnetorheological solids: materials, fabrication, testing, and applications. Adv Eng Mater 17: 563–597.    
  • 8. Shamonin M, Kramarenko E (2018) Highly Responsive Magnetoactive Elastomers, In: Domracheva N, Caporali M, Rentschler E, Novel Magnetic Nanostructures: Unique Properties and Applications, Elsevier, 221–245.
  • 9. Karsli N, Aytac A (2013) Tensile and thermomechanical properties of short carbon fiber reinforced polyamide 6 composites. Compos Part B-Eng 51: 270–275.    
  • 10. Ning F, Cong W, Qiu J, et al. (2015) Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling. Compos Part B-Eng 80: 369–378.    
  • 11. Gu H, Tadakamalla S, Huang Y, et al. (2012) Polyaniline stabilized magnetite nanoparticle reinforced epoxy nanocomposites. ACS Appl Mater Inter 4: 5613–5624.    
  • 12. Abramchuk S, Kramarenko E, Grishin D, et al. (2007) Novel highly elastic magnetic materials for dampers and seals: Part II. Material behavior in a magnetic field. Polym Advan Technol 18: 513–518.
  • 13. Stolbov O, Raikher Y, Balasoiu M (2011) Modelling of magnetodipolar striction in soft magnetic elastomers. Soft Matter 7: 8484–8487.    
  • 14. Guo N, Leu M (2013) Additive manufacturing: Technology, applications and research needs. Front Mech Eng 8: 215–243.    
  • 15. Drummer D, Cifuentes-Cuéllar S, Rietzel D (2012) Suitability of PLA/TCP for fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyping J 18: 500–507.    
  • 16. Ge C, Priyadarshini L, Cormier D, et al. (2018) A preliminary study of cushion properties of a 3D printed thermoplastic polyurethane Kelvin foam. Packag Technol Sci 31: 361–368.    
  • 17. Carneiro O, Silva A, Gomes R (2015) Fused deposition modeling with polypropylene. Mater Design 83: 768–776.    
  • 18. Ahn S, Montero M, Odell D, et al. (2002) Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyping J 8: 248–257.    
  • 19. Tanikella N, Wittbrodt B, Pearce J (2017) Tensile strength of commercial polymer materials for fused filament fabrication 3D printing. Addit Manuf 15: 40–47.    
  • 20. Tibbits S (2015) Challenges and Opportunities. 3D Print Addit Manuf 2: 151.    
  • 21. Zhong W, Li F, Zhang Z, et al. (2001) Short fiber reinforced composites for fused deposition modeling. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 301: 125–130.    
  • 22. Tekinalp H, Kunc V, Velez-Garcia G, et al. (2014) Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive manufacturing. Compos Sci Technol 105: 144–150.    
  • 23. Sharma U, Concagh D, Core L, et al. (2018) The development of bioresorbable composite polymeric implants with high mechanical strength. Nat Mater 17: 96–102.    
  • 24. Libanori R, Erb R, Reiser A, et al. (2012) Stretchable heterogeneous composites with extreme mechanical gradients. Nat Commun 3: 1265.    
  • 25. Kim Y, Ribeiro L, Maillot F, et al. (2010) Bio-inspired synthesis and mechanical properties of calcite-polymer particle composites. Adv Mater 22: 2082–2086.    
  • 26. Nikzad M (2011) New metal/polymer composites for fused deposition modelling applications [PhD thesis]. Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
  • 27. Kim Y, Yuk H, Zhao R, et al. (2018) Printing ferromagnetic domains for untethered fast- transforming soft materials. Nature 558: 274–279.    
  • 28. Technical Specifications: NinjaFlex® 3D Printing Filament. Available from: https://ninjatek.fppsites.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/NinjaFlex-TDS.pdf.
  • 29. Lee T, Morgenstern A, Höft T, et al. (2019) Dispersion of particulate in solvent cast magnetic thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer composites. AIMS Mater Sci 6: 354–362.    
  • 30. Callister W, Rethwisch D (2015) Characteristics, Applications, and Processing of Polymers, In: Fundamentals of Materials Science and Engineering: An Integrated Approach, 8 Eds., Wiley, 575–576.
  • 31. Fu S, Feng X, Lauke B, et al. (2008) Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites. Compos Part B-Eng 39: 933–961.    
  • 32. Ahmed S, Jones F (1990) A review of particulate reinforcement theories for polymer composites. J Mater Sci 25: 4933–4942.    
  • 33. Pu Z, Mark J, Jethmalani J, et al. (1997) Effects of dispersion and aggregation of silica in the reinforcement of poly(methyl acrylate) elastomers. Chem Mater 9: 2442–2447.    
  • 34. Drozdov A, Dorfmann A (2001) The stress–strain response and ultimate strength of filled elastomers. Comp Mater Sci 21: 395–417.    
  • 35. Abramchuk S, Kramarenko E, Stepanov G, et al. (2007) Novel highly elastic magnetic materials for dampers and seals : Part I. Preparation and characterization of the elastic materials. Polym Advan Technol 18: 883–890.
  • 36. Boczkowska A, Awietjan SF, Wejrzanowski T, et al. (2009) Image analysis of the microstructure of magnetorheological elastomers. J Mater Sci 44: 3135–3140.    
  • 37. Li J, Zhang M, Wang L, et al. (2011) Design and fabrication of microfluidic mixer from carbonyl iron–PDMS composite membrane. Microfluid Nanofluid 10: 919–925.    
  • 38. Masłowski M, Strąkowska A, Strzelec K (2017) Magnetic (ethylene–octene) elastomer composites obtained by extrusion. Polym Eng Sci 57: 520–527.    
  • 39. Cullity B (1972) Ferrimagnetism, In: Introduction to Magnetic Materials, Menio Park: Addison- Wesley Publishing Company, 190.


This article has been cited by

  • 1. E.A. Périgo, J. Jacimovic, F. García Ferré, L.M. Scherf, Additive Manufacturing of Magnetic Materials, Additive Manufacturing, 2019, 100870, 10.1016/j.addma.2019.100870

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved