AIMS Bioengineering, 2016, 3(4): 515-527. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2016.4.515

Research article

Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Growth on elastic silicone substrate elicits a partial myogenic response in periodontal ligament derived stem cells

1 Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Miami Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, FL, USA
2 Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA

The processes of cellular differentiation and phenotypic maintenance can be influenced by stimuli from a variety of different factors. One commonly overlooked factor is the mechanical properties of the growth substrate in which stem cells are maintained or differentiated down various lineages. Here we explored the effect that growth on an elastic silicone substrate had on the myogenic expression and cytoskeletal morphology of periodontal ligament derived stem cells. Cells were grown on either collagen I coated tissue culture polystyrene plates or collagen I coated elastic silicone membranes for a period of 4 days without further induction from soluble factors in the culture media. Following the 4-day growth, gene expression and immunohistochemical analysis for key cardiomyogenic markers was performed along with a morphological assessment of cytoskeletal organization. Results show that cells grown on the elastic substrate significantly upregulate key markers associated with contractile activity in muscle tissues. Namely, the myosin light chain polypeptides 2 and 7, as well as the myosin heavy chain polypeptide 7 genes underwent a statistically significant upregulation in the cells grown on elastic silicone membranes. Similarly, the cells on the softer elastic substrate stained positive for both sarcomeric actin and cardiac troponin t proteins following just 4 days of growth on the softer material. Cytoskeletal analysis showed that substrate stiffness had a marked effect on the organization and distribution of filamentous actin fibers within the cell body. Growth on silicone membranes produced flatter and shorter cellular morphologies with filamentous actin fibers projecting anisotropically throughout the cell body. These results demonstrate how crucial the mechanical properties of the growth substrate of cells can be on the ultimate cellular phenotype. These observations highlight the need to further optimize differentiation protocols to enhance the application of cellular products in the fields of regenerative medicine and stem cell therapies.
  Article Metrics


1. Shimizu N, Yamamoto K, Obi S, et al. (2008) Cyclic strain induces mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation into vascular smooth muscle cells by activating PDGF receptor beta. J Appl Physio 104: 766–772.    

2. Gwak SJ, Bhang SH, Kim IK, et al. (2008) The effect of cyclic strain on embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Biomaterials 29: 844–856.    

3. Hwang YS, Cho J, Tay F, et al. (2009) The use of murine embryonic stem cells, alginate encapsulation, and rotary microgravity bioreactor in bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 30: 499–507.    

4. Pelaez D, Huang CYC, Cheung HS (2009) Cyclic compression maintains viability and induces chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells in fibrin gel scaffolds. Stem Cells Dev 18: 93–102.    

5. Park JS, Huang NF, Kurpinski KT, et al. (2007) Mechanobiology of mesenchymal stem cells and their use in cardiovascular repair. Front Biosci 12: 5098–5116.    

6. Kurpinski K, Chu J, Hashi C, et al. (2006) Anisotropic mechanosensing by mesenchymal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 16095–16100.    

7. Schmelter M, Ateghang B, Helmig S, et al. (2006) Embryonic stem cells utilize reactive oxygen species as transducers of mechanical strain-induced cardiovascular differentiation. FASEB J 20: 1182–1184.    

8. Evans ND, Minelli C, Gentleman E, et al. (2009) Substrate stiffness affects early differentiation events in embryonic stem cells. Eur Cell Mater 18: 1–14.

9. Colley H, McArthur SL, Stolzing A, et al. (2012) Culture on fibrin matrices maintains the colony-forming capacity and osteoblastic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Biomed Mater 7: 45015.    

10. Li S, Huang NF, Hsu S (2005) Mechanotransduction in endothelial cell migration. J Cell Biochem 96: 1110–1126.    

11. Rosenbluth MJ, Crow A, Shaevitz JW, et al. (2008) Slow stress propagation in adherent cells. Biophys J 95: 6052–6059.    

12. Follonier L, Schaub S, Meister JJ, et al. (2008) Myofibroblast communication is controlled by intercellular mechanical coupling. J Cell Sci 121: 3305–3316.    

13. Invernici G, Cristini S, Madeddu P, et al. (2008) Human adult skeletal muscle stem cells differentiate into cardiomyocyte phenotype in vitro. Exp Cell Res 314: 366–376.    

14. Jacot JG, McCulloch AD, Omens JH (2008) Substrate stiffness affects the functional maturation of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. Biophys J 95: 3479–3487.    

15. Engler AJ, Carag-Krieger C, Johnson CP, et al. (2008) Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a matrix with heart-like elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating. J Cell Sci 121: 3794–3802.    

16. Ren K, Crouzier T, Roy C, et al. (2008) Polyelectrolyte multilayer films of controlled stiffness modulate myoblast cells differentiation. Adv Funct Mater 18: 1378–1389.    

17. Winer JP, Janmey PA, McCormick ME, et al. (2009) Bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells become quiescent on soft substrates but remain responsive to chemical or mechanical stimuli. Tissue Eng Part A 15: 147–154.

18. Solon J, Levental I, Sengupta K, et al. (2007) Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. Biophys J 93: 4453–4461.    

19. Paszek MJ, Boettiger D, Weaver VM, et al. (2009) Integrin Clustering Is Driven by Mechanical Resistance from the Glycocalyx and the Substrate PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000604.

20. Pelham RJ, Wang YL (1998) Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by the mechanical properties of the substrate. Biol Bull 194: 348–350.    

21. Huang CYC, Pelaez D, Dominguez-Bendala J, et al. (2009) Plasticity of stem cells derived from adult periodontal ligament. Regen Med 4: 809–821.    

22. Hiesinger W, Brukman MJ, McCormick RC, et al. (2012) Myocardial tissue elastic properties determined by atomic force microscopy after stromal cell-derived factor 1α angiogenic therapy for acute myocardial infarction in a murine model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143: 962–966.    

23. Gilbert PM, Havenstrite KL, Magnusson KEG, et al. (2010) Substrate elasticity regulates skeletal muscle stem cell self-renewal in culture. Science 329: 1078–1081.    

24. Avallone E, Baumeister III T, Sadegh A, (2007) N.A., In: N.A., Marks’ Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers, 11 Eds., McGraw-Hill Education.

25. Material properties specification sheet: Bioflex membrane, 2006.

26. Katzengold R, Shoham N, Benayahu D, et al. (2015) Simulating single cell experiments in mechanical testing of adipocytes. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 14: 537–547.    

27. Rowlands AS, George PA, Cooper-White JJ (2008) Directing osteogenic and myogenic differentiation of MSCs: interplay of stiffness and adhesive ligand presentation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 295: C1037–C1044.    

28. Georges PC, Janmey PA (2005) Cell type-specific response to growth on soft materials. J Appl Physiol 98: 1547–1553.    

Copyright Info: © 2016, Herman S. Cheung, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved