Socio-Natural Disasters and Vulnerability Reduction in the territorial ecosystems

  E-mail   Print

Guest Editors
Salvatore Cannizzaro, University of Catania, Italy;
Francesco De Pascale, Italian National Research Council, Research Institute for Geo-Hydrological Protection, Italy;
Piero Farabollini, University of Camerino, Italy;
Francesco Muto, University of Calabria Italy.

Manuscript Topics
The awareness that natural hazards exist, the study of their characteristics and the most appropriate behaviour to adopt when faced with them are a realistic way of dealing with them and reducing their negative effects on the population, cultural and artistic heritage and social and economic activity in a given area.

Human communities live in territorial ecosystems where natural extreme events such as landslides, earthquakes, tsunamis, floods, hurricanes, volcanic eruptions, droughts could occur. These events become “disasters” when they involve population causing widespread human, material, economic or environmental losses. Both population growth and unsustainable economic rise have caused population expansion in areas at high hazard, increasing vulnerability. In fact, people’s vulnerability cannot be attributed only to an increase of the occurrence of extreme physical phenomena. Vulnerabilities are shaped by social, economic and political conditions. Even if considerable progress has been made for understanding causes and processes related to the mentioned natural phenomena and their probability of occurrence, further efforts need to be made for reducing disaster risk (DRR) – i.e. to reduce the damages caused by natural hazards with the complicity of the society. In fact, despite the still very frequent diffusion of the expression “natural disaster”, disasters cannot be defined simply natural but, more correctly, “socio-natural” (Mela et al., 2017), being processes - slow or sudden - that are located in the intersection between “nature and society”, resulting from the interaction between a destructive agent (such as an earthquake, a tsunami, a hurricane, a flood) and the socio-cultural and environmental context on which it impacts (Forino and Carnelli, 2017).In this way, it is necessary to focus on the following aspects :

• raising people’s awareness of risk, change and uncertainty in their lives;
• passing on historical memory together with a knowledge of diversity in a multiscale, multidisciplinary (ecological, social, cultural and political) sense in order to increase the options available and minimize risk (De Pascale et al., 2015). Furthermore, the analysis of the population’s perception of natural phenomena and possible successive intervention with regard to behaviour that is considered improper and unsuitable in the context of risk, can provide a stimulus for the adoption of positive individual and social behaviour for risk reduction;
• cohabiting adequately with natural hazards;
• reducing vulnerability of people and property, and the exposure to hazards;
• improving preparedness and early warning for adverse events, communication and emergency planning, recovery and rehabilitation initiatives.
In practice, it is necessary to activate a series of actions and strategies (policies) that involve, at different scales, every part of the society, the government, the professional and private sectors, the members of the academic community.
This Special Issue aims to present case-study based analysis of interdisciplinary approaches, also innovative, to Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) and Disaster Risk Management (DRM). Topics of interest include, but are not limited to, the following:

• Vulnerability reduction;
• Prevention and population preparedness, community based approach;
• Risk communication and social perception;
• Historical memory and representation of disasters in popular culture;
• Adaptive capacity and resilience;
• New technologies for investigations of hazards and risk;
• Disaster governance.

Paper submission
 All manuscripts will be peer-reviewed before their acceptance for publication.
Selected manuscript submission due date : April 15, 2019
End of peer-reviewed process due date : April 30, 2019
Reviewed manuscript submission due date : June 30, 2019

Instructions for authors
Please submit your manuscript to online submission system

Simone Valitutto
AIMS Geosciences, 2020, 6(1): 31-34. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2020003
+ Abstract     + HTML     + PDF(154 KB)
Salvatore Cannizzaro, Francesco De Pascale, Piero Farabollini, Francesco Muto
AIMS Geosciences, 2020, 6(1): 1-5. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2020001
+ Abstract     + HTML     + PDF(178 KB)
Ana Hampshire, James L. Sipes
AIMS Geosciences, 2019, 5(4): 899-920. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.4.899
+ Abstract     + HTML     + PDF(1956 KB)
Maria Laura Longo
AIMS Geosciences, 2019, 5(3): 631-644. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.3.631
+ Abstract     + HTML     + PDF(190 KB)
Francesca Romana Lugeri, Piero Farabollini, Nicola Lugeri
AIMS Geosciences, 2019, 5(3): 617-630. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.3.617
+ Abstract     + HTML     + PDF(1242 KB)
Bufalini Margherita, Farabollini Piero, Fuffa Emy, Materazzi Marco, Pambianchi Gilberto, Tromboni Michele
AIMS Geosciences, 2019, 5(3): 568-590. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.3.568
+ Abstract     + HTML     + PDF(2123 KB)
Elisabetta Dall’Ò
AIMS Geosciences, 2019, 5(3): 493-508. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.3.493
+ Abstract     + HTML     + PDF(275 KB)
Giovanni Gugg
AIMS Geosciences, 2019, 5(3): 480-492. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.3.480
+ Abstract     + HTML     + PDF(175 KB)
Leonardo Mercatanti, Gaetano Sabato
AIMS Geosciences, 2019, 5(3): 448-460. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.3.448
+ Abstract     + HTML     + PDF(447 KB)
Giovanni Messina
AIMS Geosciences, 2019, 5(2): 265-272. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.2.265
+ Abstract     + HTML     + PDF(294 KB)
Open Access Journals
Open Access Journals