Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Dry sorbent injection of trona to control acid gases from a pilot-scale coal-fired combustion facility

1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
2 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
3 Jacobs Technology, Inc., 600 William Northern Blvd., Tullahoma, TN 37388, USA

Special Issues: Advanced Technologies for Air Pollution Control

 Gaseous and particulate emissions from the combustion of coal have been associated with adverse effects on human and environmental health, and have for that reason been subject to regulation by federal and state governments. Recent regulations by the United States Environmental Protection Agency have further restricted the emissions of acid gases from electricity generating facilities and other industrial facilities, and upcoming deadlines are forcing industry to consider both pre- and post-combustion controls to maintain compliance. As a result of these recent regulations, dry sorbent injection of trona to remove acid gas emissions (e.g. HCl, SO2, and NOx) from coal combustion, specifically 90% removal of HCl, was the focus of the current investigation. Along with the measurement of HCl, SO2, and NOx, measurements of particulate matter (PM), elemental (EC), and organic carbon (OC) were also accomplished on a pilot-scale coal-fired combustion facility.
Gaseous and particulate emissions from a coal-fired combustor burning bituminous coal and using dry sorbent injection were the focus of the current study. From this investigation it was shown that high levels of trona were needed to achieve the goal of 90% HCl removal, but with this increased level of trona injection the ESP and BH were still able to achieve greater than 95% fine PM control. In addition to emissions reported, measurement of acid gases by standard EPA methods were compared to those of an infrared multi-component gas analyzer. This comparison revealed good correlation for emissions of HCl and SO2, but poor correlation in the measurement of NOx emissions.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

References

1. Martinelli R, Doyle JB, Redinger KE (1995) SOx-NOx-Rox-Box Technology Review & Global Commercial Opportunities. Fourth Annual Clean Coal Technology Conference, Denver, CO.

2. Shemwell B, Ajay A, Levendis YA, et al. (2000). A Laboratory Investigation on Combined In-Furnace Sorbent Injection and Hot Flue-Gas Filtration to Simultaneously Capture SO2, NOx, HCl, and Particulate Emissions. Environ Sci Tech 34: 4855-4866.    

3. Chisholm PN, Rochelle GT (2000) Absorption of HCl and SO2 from Humidified Flue Gas with Calcium Silicate Solids. Ind Eng Chem Res 39: 1048-1060.    

4. 40 CFR Part 60 and 63. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Coal- and Oil-fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired Electric Utility, Industrial-Commercial-Institutional, and Small Industrial Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units.

5. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Electric Power Annual 2013, 1–218. 2015. Available from: http://www.eia.gov/electricity/annual/pdf/epa.pdf

6. Srivastava RK, Josewicz W, Singer C (2001) SO2 Scrubbing Technologies: A Review. Environ Prog 20: 219-228.    

7. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA CICA Fact Sheet: Air Pollution Control Technology - EPA-452/F-03-034. Available from: http://www3.epa.gov/ttncatc1/dir1/ffdg.pdf

8. Schnelle KB, Brown CA (2002) Air Pollution Control Technology Handbook. CRC Press LLC. Boca Raton, FL.

9. Kong Y, Wood MD (2010) Dry Injection of Trona for SO3 Control. Power 2: 1-3.    

10. Rostam-Abadi MR, Moran D L, Roman VP, et al. (1990) High-surface-area hydrated lime for sulfur dioxide control. Preprint Paper Am Chem Soc Div Fuel Chem 35: 1418-1426.

11. Maziuk J (2010) Patent No. US7854911 B2. Washington, DC: US Patent and Trademark Office.

12. Kong Y, Wood MD (2011) Dry Injection of Sodium Sorbents for Air Pollution Control. Period Am Acad Environ Eng 47: 20-23.

13. Su T, Shi H, Wang J (2011) Impact of Trona-Based SO2 Control on the Elemental Leaching Behavior of Fly Ash. Energy Fuels 25: 3514-3521.    

14. Often GR, McElroy MW, Muzio LJ (1987) Assessment of Dry Sorbenf Emission Control Technologies Part II. Applications. JAPCA 37: 968-980.    

15. Ritzenthaler DP (2005) Patent No. US 0201914 A1. Washington, DC: US Patent and Trademark Office.

16. Chin M, Kahn R, Schwartz S (2009) Atmospheric Aerosol Properties and Climate Impacts: A Report by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research. Washington, DC: NASA.

17. Pope CA, Dockery DW (2006) Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air Pollution: Lines that Connect. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 56: 709-742.    

18. Heal MR, Kumar P, Harrison RM (2012) Particles, Air Quality, Policy and Health. Chem Soc Rev 41: 6606-6630.    

Copyright Info: © 2016, Tiffany L. B. Yelverton, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved