Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Research note

A TaqMan PCR assay for detection of DGAT1 K232A polymorphism in cattle

  • Received: 12 June 2018 Accepted: 28 August 2018 Published: 05 September 2018
  • Metabolic processes involved in the control of fatty acid composition and ratio can greatly influence the quality of cow milk and beef. One of the key elements in this complex pathway is the enzyme diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1). Numerous studies showed a strong correlation between DGAT1 K232A allelic variants and the content of saturated fat in cow milk and the level of beef marbling. PCR-RFLP, the widely used method for SNP detection, is laborious and time-consuming. This article describes the development of an efficient and rapid assay for detection of DGAT1 K232A polymorphism, based on real-time PCR with allele-specific TaqMan probes. The proposed method was validated by PCR-RFLP and the results fully coincided. Thus, our developed assay is efficient and reliable for rapid identification of DGAT1 K and A allelic variants in cattle that can be successfully applied in cattle breeding.

    Citation: Anna V. Babii, Anna L. Arkhipova, Irina N. Andreichenko, Artyom V. Brigida, Svetlana N. Kovalchuk. A TaqMan PCR assay for detection of DGAT1 K232A polymorphism in cattle[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2018, 3(3): 306-312. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2018.3.306

    Related Papers:

    [1] Svetlana N. Kovalchuk, Anna L. Arkhipova, Eugene A. Klimov . Development of real-time PCR assay for genotyping SNP rs41255693 in cattle SCD gene. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(1): 14-19. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.1.14
    [2] Elizabeth Ramírez-Iglesias, Rosa M. Hernández-Hernández, Carlos Bravo, José R. Ramírez-Iglesias, Pablo Herrera . Consumption, digestibility and cattle condition according to forage composition and quality in maize-cattle from conservation-based agroecosystems. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(3): 480-499. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.3.480
    [3] Svyatoslav Lebedev, Elena Sheida, Irina Vershinina, Victoria Grechkina, Ilmira Gubaidullina, Sergey Miroshnikov, Oksana Shoshina . Use of chromium nanoparticles as a protector of digestive enzymes and biochemical parameters for various sources of fat in the diet of calves. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 14-31. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021002
    [4] Hamida Mahroug, Adra Mouellef, Hayat Bourekoua, Fairouz Djeghim, Haroun Chenchouni, Abdelkader Benbelkacem, Mohamed Hadef El Okki, Awatif Fetouhi, Nedjla Silini, Ana María Calderón de la Barca . Breadmaking and protein characteristics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes tolerant against drought and heat in Algeria. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(2): 531-550. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024030
    [5] Marcelo Augusto de Carvalho, Cíntia Sorane Good Kitzberger, Altamara Viviane de Souza Sartori, Marta de Toledo Benassi, Maria Brígida dos Santos Scholz, Clandio Medeiros da Silva . Free choice profiling sensory analysis and principal component analysis as tools to support an apple breeding program. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 769-784. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.769
    [6] Nionela V. Kononenko, Aleksandra A. Sharova, Larisa I. Fedoreyeva . Tissue damage to wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum) under salt exposure. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(3): 395-407. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.3.395
    [7] Eyassu Seifu . Recent advances on camel milk: Nutritional and health benefits and processing implications—A review. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(4): 777-804. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022048
    [8] Muhammad Umer Farooq, Iqra Ishaaq, Rizwana Maqbool, Iqra Aslam, Syed Muhammad Taseer Abbas Naqvi, Sana e Mustafa . Heritability, genetic gain and detection of gene action in hexaploid wheat for yield and its related attributes. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(1): 56-72. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.1.56
    [9] Muhammad Fuad Anshori, Bambang Sapta Purwoko, Iswari Saraswati Dewi, Willy Bayuardi Suwarno, Sintho Wahyuning Ardie . Salinity tolerance selection of doubled-haploid rice lines based on selection index and factor analysis. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(3): 520-535. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022032
    [10] Samsul Ma'arif, Bambang Sapta Purwoko, Arya Widura Ritonga, Iswari Saraswati Dewi . Effects of shade on agronomic traits of doubled haploid lines of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) obtained from anther culture. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2025, 10(1): 199-217. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2025011
  • Metabolic processes involved in the control of fatty acid composition and ratio can greatly influence the quality of cow milk and beef. One of the key elements in this complex pathway is the enzyme diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1). Numerous studies showed a strong correlation between DGAT1 K232A allelic variants and the content of saturated fat in cow milk and the level of beef marbling. PCR-RFLP, the widely used method for SNP detection, is laborious and time-consuming. This article describes the development of an efficient and rapid assay for detection of DGAT1 K232A polymorphism, based on real-time PCR with allele-specific TaqMan probes. The proposed method was validated by PCR-RFLP and the results fully coincided. Thus, our developed assay is efficient and reliable for rapid identification of DGAT1 K and A allelic variants in cattle that can be successfully applied in cattle breeding.


    1. Introduction

    Diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1) (EC 2.3.1.20) is one of the key enzymes involved in triglyceride metabolism. It catalyzes the final stage of triglyceride biosynthesis, using 1, 2-diacylglycerol and acyl-CoA as substrates [1]. DGAT1 plays an important role in several physiological processes in higher eukaryotes, such as regulation of triacylgliceride concentration in blood, formation of adipose tissue, maturation of oocytes etc. [2,3]. The deficit of DGAT1 leads to breakdown of fatty acid synthesis in adipose tissue and skeletal muscles [4], as well as disruption in lactation up to its lack [5].

    In cattle (Bos taurus) genome the dgat1 gene is localized in the centromeric region of chromosome 14 together with other genes that determine milk productivity and quality and form the so-called quantitative trait loci (QTL) [6,7]. The study of allelic polymorphism in DGAT1 gene revealed about two dozen single-nucleotide substitutions, most of which were localized in non-coding regions and did not influence the structure of the enzyme [8,9,10,11]. Two of the most relevant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) that alter the amino acid sequence of the DGAT1 protein were found in the coding sequence in exon 8 (rs109234250 and rs109326954): The dinucleotide substitution GC→AA (positions 10433 and 10434 in dgat1 sequence, GenBank no. AJ318490, position 1802265 and 1802266 on chromosome 14) results in the replacement of alanine with lysine (A→K) at position 232 in the protein. The proposed ancestral K allele was shown to associate with higher activity of the enzyme [8]. The numerous studies conducted on different cattle breeds revealed a link between the presence of the 232K allele and high fat content in cow milk and the predominance of saturated C16:0 and C18:0 fatty acids over unsaturated [8,9,12,13,14]. There are also data on correlation between K allele and high percent of intramuscular lipid and beef marbling scores [10,15,16]. Thus, dgat1 is recognized as a candidate gene for the control of fat content and composition in cow milk and beef. The breeding of cattle bearing the A allele can improve the quality of milk by the content of unsaturated fats, while allele K-based selection of animals helps increase the content of saturated fats in milk and meat.

    In the current study we aimed to develop a reliable and rapid assay for detection of DGAT1 K232A polymorphism in cattle.


    2. Material and methods


    2.1. DNA isolation and primer design

    The study was conducted using 50 blood samples from cows of Black-and-White holsteinized cattle. Whole blood samples were collected from tail vein with VACUETTE tubes with К3 EDTA (Greiner Bio-One, Austria). The genomic DNA was isolated using the M-sorb kit with magnetic beads (Syntol, Russia) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer.

    The dgat1 gene sequence was retrieved from GenBank (GenBank accession AJ318490). The GeneRunner [17] and Multiple Primer Analyzer [18] software programs were applied for the design of primers and TaqMan probes.


    2.2. Real time-PCR assay conditions and validation

    The real-time PCR amplification was run in 10 µL of reaction mix, which contained 5 µL of LightCycler®480 Probes Master (Roche, Switzerland), forward primer Dgat1-F: 5'-TGCTGGCCCTGATGGTCTACAC-3' (0.4 µM), reverse primer Dgat1-R: 5'-GCGGTAGGTCAGGTTGTCGG-3' (0.4 µM), and allele-specific fluorescent probes Dgat1-А: 5'-(FAM)-TAAGGCGGCCAACGGGGGAGCTGC-(BHQ1)-3' (0.2 µM) and Dgat1-К: 5'-(Cy5)-TAAGAAGGCCAACGGGGGAGCTGC-(BHQ2)-3' (0.2 µM). The amount of DNA was 20 ng per reaction.

    The real-time PCR was run on LightCycler® 96 (Roche, Switzerland) under optimized conditions (95 ℃ for 10 min; 95 ℃ for 15 sec., 60 ℃ for 15 sec., 72 ℃ for 15 sec., 40 cycles). The probe emitted fluorescence was detected at the stage of elongation in FAM and Cy5 channels. The results of genotyping were analyzed using the LightCycler® 96 thermal cycler software (version SW1.1).

    The validation of the developed method was conducted by PCR-RFLP method, described by us earlier [19] (Table 1). Briefly, Dgat1-F: 5'-TGCTGGCCCTGATGGTCTACAC-3' and Dgat1-R2: 5'-GAAGGAAGCAAGCGGACAGT-3' primers were used to amplify 540-bp fragment of dgat1 gene. PCR was performed with use of qPCRmix-HS kit (Evrogen, Russia). PCR conditions were as follows: 95 ℃ for 10 min; 95 ℃ for 15 sec., 62 ℃ for 15 sec., 72 ℃ for 15 sec., 40 cycles. The obtained amplicons were digested with 0.2 units of AcoI (Sibenzyme, Russia) at 37 ℃ for 16 h. The restriction products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel [19].

    Table 1. Available methods of PCR-RFLP analysis.
    Primer sequences and orientation Restrictase Genotype profiles (bp) Reference
    KK AA AK
    5'-GCACCATCCTCTTCCTCAAG-3' (+) CfrI 411 203/208 411/203/208 [8]
    5'-GGAAGCGCTTTCGGATG-3' (−)
    5'-TTCCTCAAGCTGTTCTCCTA-3' (+) EaeI 558 369/189 558/369/189 [10]
    5'-CACGTACCTGCTGGATCA-3' (−)
    5'-TGCCGCTTGCTCGTAGCTTTGGCC-3' (+) BglI 282/96 254/96/28 282/254/96/28 [20]
    5'-ACCTGGAGCTGGGTGAGGAACAGC-3' (−)
    5'-TGCTGGCCCTGATGGTCTACAC-3' (+) AcoI 540 220/320 540/220/320 [19]
    5'-GAAGGAAGCAAGCGGACAGT-3' (−)
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    3. Results and discussion

    To date, PCR-RFLP, direct sequencing, high resolution melting analysis (HRMA) and real-time PCR methods have been proposed for genotyping DGAT1 K 232A polymorphism in cattle [8,10,20,21,22,23].

    PCR-RFLP is a widely used method for identification of allelic variants of genes. Several PCR-RFLP methods for cattle genotyping for DGAT1 K 232A polymorphism have been proposed [8,10,19,20]. The differences of the available methods concerned the primers used for the specific amplification and the endonuclease applied at the stage of DNA restriction (Table 1). The main advantage of PCR-RFLP is low relative cost of the analysis, but it is a time and labour-consuming (over 12 hours), low productive method. Other important disadvantages of PCR-RFLP include the lack of possibility to automate the analysis and the probability of unreliable results due to non-optimal ratio of the amounts of DNA, restrictase and restriction time. The limiting factor for the application of this method is the absence of appropriate restriction enzymes able to cut the DNA at the desired polymorphic region of the gene [24].

    The main disadvantage of direct sequencing is high relative cost for large-scale genotyping. High resolution melting analysis (HRMA) is a simple, rapid, and relatively inexpensive method, but its accuracy depends strongly on the used dye and temperature precision of the instrument [21,25]. Besides, HRMA is sensible to ionic strength of compared samples [26] and is not suitable for genotyping GC-rich regions [27].

    The real time-PCR method with allele-specific hydrolysis probes (TaqMan) is an effective alternative to the methods mentioned above. Although real-time PCR (as well as direct sequencing) is more expensive than PCR-RFLP, it has no limitation inherent in HRMA and, in contrast to PCR-RFLP and direct sequencing, can be used for large-scale animal genotyping.

    In the current work we developed a method for identification of A and K allelic variants of Bos taurus DGAT1 based on real-time PCR technology and TaqMan probes. In the PCR assay we used a set of two primers, which were common for the both dgat1 alleles, and two allele-specific TaqMan probes. The Dgat1-F and Dgat1-R primers initiate the amplification of 279-bp fragment of the dgat1 gene. The identification of A and K alleles of DGAT1 is based on the comparison of fluorescence intensity of FAM and Cy5 dyes, respectively. The final values of FAM and Cy5 fluorescence are used to determine the tested animal's genotype. Here we analyzed the genotyping results by the LightCycler® 96 thermal cycler software (version SW1.1) that presents the results as a distribution of alleles (Figure 1).

    Figure 1. Example of a distribution diagram of DGAT1 A and K alleles.

    For samples homozygous for A allele (AA genotype) an increase in fluorescence is detected in FAM channel (Figure 2a). For samples homozygous for K allele (KK genotype) the fluorescent signal is registered in Cy5 channel (Figure 2b). In the case of heterozygous samples (AK genotype) the fluorescent signal is observed by both FAM and Cy5 channels (Figure 2c). Thus, the results of the real-timePCR assay with the allele-specific TaqMan probes allow to unambiguously determine the presence of each of the alleles of DGAT1 gene in the analyzed DNA sample and the animal's genotype, accordingly.

    Figure 2. (a) The result of the study of samples homozygous for K allele (KK genotype); (b) the result of the study of samples homozygous for A allele (AA genotype); (c) fluorescence curves for heterozygous samples (AK genotype).

    The developed by us TaqMan PCR assay was tested on 50 DNA samples from Black-and-White holsteinized cattle. The results of genotyping showed that 50% of animals carried both DGAT1 alleles (AK genotype), 29.2% were homozygous for A allele (AA genotype) and 20.8% of the tested cows were homozygous for K allele (KK genotype).

    In order to validate our method of genotyping DGAT1 K232A polymorphism we conducted PCR-RFLP analysis, described by us earlier [19] (Figure 3). The results of both methods coincided, but despite the low relative cost of PCR-RFLP analysis (the only advantage of the method in comparison with real-time PCR), it is not convenient for genotyping a large number of animals. TaqMan PCR assay is more suitable for large-scale animal genotyping as it helps considerably shorten the time of analysis (up to 1 hour) and avoid operator errors due to one-step procedure.

    Figure 3. Example of PCR-RFLP genotyping for DGAT1 K232A. The homozygous (AA or KK) and heterozygous (AK) genotypes, along with the corresponding length of the amplified DNA fragments are presented. M—DNA ladder.

    Thus, we developed an efficient and reliable method for rapid identification of K and A allelic variants of the dgat1 gene of cattle based on real-time PCR and using allele-specific fluorescently labelled probes that can be successfully applied in cattle breeding in order to predict the quality of milk and meat from offspring depending on the content of saturated and unsaturated fats.


    Conflict of interest

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.


    [1] Farese RV, Cases S, Smith SJ (2000) Triglyceride synthesis: Insights from the cloning of diacylglycerol acyltransferase. Curr Opin Lipidol 11: 229–234. doi: 10.1097/00041433-200006000-00002
    [2] Homa ST, Racowsky C, Mcgaughey RW (1986) Lipid analysis of immature pig oocytes. J Reprod Fertil 77: 425–434. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0770425
    [3] Cases S, Smith SJ, Zheng YW, et al. (1998) Identification of a gene encoding an acyl CoA: Diacylglycerol acyltransferase, a key enzyme in triacylglycerol synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95: 13018–13023. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.22.13018
    [4] Chen HC, Smith SJ, Ladha Z, et al. (2002) Increased insulin and leptin sensitivity in mice lacking acyl CoA: Diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1. J Clin Invest 109: 1049–1055. doi: 10.1172/JCI0214672
    [5] Smith SJ, Cases S, Jensen DR, et al. (2000) Obesity resistance and multiple mechanisms of triglyceride synthesis in mice lacking Dgat. Nat Genet 25: 87–90. doi: 10.1038/75651
    [6] Riquet J, Coppieters W, Cambisano N, et al. (1999) Fine-mapping of quantitative trait loci by identity by descent in outbred populations: Application to milk production in dairy cattle. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96: 9252–9257. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.16.9252
    [7] Farnir F, Grisart B, Coppieters W, et al. (2002) Simultaneous mining of linkage and linkage disequilibrium to fine map quantitative trait loci in outbred half-sib pedigrees: Revisiting the location of a quantitative trait locus with major effect on milk production on bovine chromosome 14. Genetics 161: 275–287.
    [8] Winter A, Kramer W, Werner FAO, et al. (2002) Association of a lysine-232/alanine polymorphism in a bovine gene encoding acyl-CoA: Diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT1) with variation at a quantitative trait locus for milk fat content. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99: 9300–9305. doi: 10.1073/pnas.142293799
    [9] Grisart B, Coppieters W, Farnir F, et al. (2002) Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: Identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition. Genome Res 12: 222–231. doi: 10.1101/gr.224202
    [10] Kong HS, Oh JD, Lee JH, et al. (2007) Association of sequence variations in DGAT 1 gene with economic traits in hanwoo (Korea Cattle). Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 20: 817–820. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2007.817
    [11] Rosse IDC, Steinberg RDS, Coimbra RS, et al. (2014) Novel SNPs and INDEL polymorphisms in the 3′UTR of DGAT1 gene: In silico analyses and a possible association. Mol Biol Rep 41: 4555–4563. doi: 10.1007/s11033-014-3326-z
    [12] Spelman RJ, Ford CA, Mcelhinney P, et al. (2002) Characterization of the DGAT1 Gene in the New Zealand Dairy Population. J Dairy Sci 85: 3514–3517. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74440-8
    [13] Fisher PJ, Spelman RJ (2004) Verification of selective DNA pooling methodology through identification and estimation of the DGAT1 effect. Anim Genet 35: 201–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2004.01137.x
    [14] Tăbăran A, Balteanu VA, Gal E, et al. (2015) Influence of DGAT1 K232A polymorphism on milk fat percentage and fatty acid profiles in Romanian Holstein Cattle. Anim Biotechnol 26: 105–111. doi: 10.1080/10495398.2014.933740
    [15] Thaller G, Kühn C, Winter A, et al. (2003) DGAT1, a new positional and functional candidate gene for intramuscular fat deposition in cattle. Anim Genet 34: 354–357. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2052.2003.01011.x
    [16] Avilés C, Polvillo O, Peña F, et al. (2013) Associations between DGAT1, FABP4, LEP, RORC, and SCD1 gene polymorphisms and fat deposition in Spanish commercial beef. J Anim Sci 91: 4571–4577. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6402
    [17] Gene Runner, 2017. Available from: http://www.generunner.net/.
    [18] Multiple Primer Analyzer, 2017. Available from:
    [19] https://www.thermofisher.com/in/en/home/brands/thermo-scientific/molecular-biology/molecular-biology-learning-center/molecular-biology-resource-library/thermo-scientific-web-tools/multiple-primer-analyzer.html.
    [20] 19. Glazko VI, Andreichenko IN, Kovalchuk SN, et al. (6) Candidate genes for control of cattle milk production traits. Russ Agric Sci 42: 458–464. doi: 10.3103/S1068367416060082
    [21] 20. Komisarek J, Michalak A (2008) A relationship between DGAT1 K232A polymorphism and selected reproductive traits in Polish Holstein-Friesian cattle. Anim Sci Pap Rep 26: 89–95.
    [22] 21. Abdolmohammadi A, Atashi H, Zamani P, et al. (2011) High resolution melting as an alternative method to genotype diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1) K232A polymorphism in cattle. Czech J Anim Sci 56: 370–376. doi: 10.17221/2393-CJAS
    [23] 22. Rashydov AN, Spiridonov VG, Konoval ON, et al. (2010) Identification of allele variants of cattle milk productivity genes using PCR and the anti-primer method. Cytol Genet 44: 272–275. doi: 10.3103/S0095452710050026
    [24] 23. Näslund J, Fikse WF, Pielberg GR, et al. (2008) Frequency and Effect of the Bovine Acyl-CoA: Diacylglycerol Acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1) K232A Polymorphism in Swedish Dairy Cattle. J Dairy Sci 91: 2127–2134. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0330
    [25] 24. Berg H (2012) Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis of PCR-Amplified Fragments (PCR-RFLP) and Gel Electrophoresis-Valuable Tool for Genotyping and Genetic Fingerprinting, In: Gel Electrophoresis-Principles and Basics, IntechOpen, 315–334.
    [26] 25. Herrmann MG, Durtschi JD, Bromley LK, et al. (2006) Amplicon DNA melting analysis for mutation scanning and genotyping: Cross-platform comparison of instruments and dyes. Clin Chem 52: 494–503. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.063438
    [27] 26. Seipp MT, Durtschi JD, Liew MA, et al. (2007) Unlabeled oligonucleotides as internal temperature controls for genotyping by amplicon melting. J Mol Diagn 9: 284–289. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2007.060136
    [28] 27. Krypuy M, Newnham GM, Thomas DM, et al. (2006) High resolution melting analysis for the rapid and sensitive detection of mutations in clinical samples: KRAS codon 12 and 13 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer 6: 295. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-295
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Svetlana N. Kovalchuk, Anna L. Arkhipova, Eugene A. Klimov, Development of real-time PCR assay for genotyping SNP rs41255693 in cattle SCD gene, 2020, 5, 2471-2086, 14, 10.3934/agrfood.2019.5.14
    2. Svetlana N. Kovalchuk, Anna L. Arkhipova, Eugene A. Klimov, Development of real-time PCR assay for genotyping SNP rs41255693 in cattle SCD gene, 2020, 5, 2471-2086, 14, 10.3934/agrfood.2020.1.14
    3. Artyom Lamanov, Yurij Ivanov, Rishat Iskhakov, Liliya Zubairova, Khamit Tagirov, Azat Salikhov, Beef quality indicators and their dependence on keeping technology of bull calves of different genotypes, 2020, 5, 2471-2086, 20, 10.3934/agrfood.2020.1.20
    4. Svetlana N. Kovalchuk, Anna L. Arkhipova, Development of TaqMan PCR assay for genotyping SNP rs211250281 of the bovine agpat6 gene, 2022, 1049-5398, 1, 10.1080/10495398.2022.2077742
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5032) PDF downloads(900) Cited by(4)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog