Citation: Ezekiel Mugendi Njeru. Exploiting diversity to promote arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and crop productivity in organic farming systems[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2018, 3(3): 280-294. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2018.3.280
[1] | Nicholas Mawira Gitonga, Gilbert Koskey, Ezekiel Mugendi Njeru, John M. Maingi, Richard Cheruiyot . Dual inoculation of soybean with Rhizophagus irregularis and commercial Bradyrhizobium japonicum increases nitrogen fixation and growth in organic and conventional soils. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(2): 478-495. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021028 |
[2] | Methuselah Mang’erere Nyamwange, Ezekiel Mugendi Njeru, Monicah Mucheru-Muna, Felix Ngetich . Soil management practices affect arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi propagules, root colonization and growth of rainfed maize. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2018, 3(2): 120-134. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2018.2.120 |
[3] | Boris Boincean, Amir Kassam, Gottlieb Basch, Don Reicosky, Emilio Gonzalez, Tony Reynolds, Marina Ilusca, Marin Cebotari, Grigore Rusnac, Vadim Cuzeac, Lidia Bulat, Dorian Pasat, Stanislav Stadnic, Sergiu Gavrilas, Ion Boaghii . Towards Conservation Agriculture systems in Moldova. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2016, 1(4): 369-386. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2016.4.369 |
[4] | Hans-Georg Schwarz-v. Raumer, Elisabeth Angenendt, Norbert Billen, Rüdiger Jooß . Economic and ecological impacts of bioenergy crop production—a modeling approach applied in Southwestern Germany. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2017, 2(1): 75-100. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2017.1.75 |
[5] | Robert Ugochukwu Onyeneke, Chinyere Augusta Nwajiuba, Chukwuemeka Chinonso Emenekwe, Anurika Nwajiuba, Chinenye Judith Onyeneke, Precious Ohalete, Uwazie Iyke Uwazie . Climate change adaptation in Nigerian agricultural sector: A systematic review and resilience check of adaptation measures. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(4): 967-1006. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.4.967 |
[6] | Gabriel Adewunmi Eyinade, Abbyssinia Mushunje, Shehu Folaranmi Gbolahan Yusuf . A systematic synthesis on the context reliant performance of organic farming. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 142-158. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021009 |
[7] | A. Nurbekov, A. Akramkhanov, A. Kassam, D. Sydyk, Z. Ziyadaullaev, J.P.A. Lamers . Conservation Agriculture for combating land degradation in Central Asia: a synthesis. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2016, 1(2): 144-156. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2016.2.144 |
[8] | Murimi David Njue, Mucheru-Muna Monicah Wanjiku, Mugi-Ngenga Esther, Zingore Shamie, Mutegi James Kinyua . Nutrient management options for enhancing productivity and profitability of conservation agriculture under on-farm conditions in central highlands of Kenya. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 666-680. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.666 |
[9] | Mariana Moraes Pinc, Rossely Gimenes Baisch, Regiane Urcoviche Lastra, Camila da Silva, Ezilda Jacomassi, Odair Alberton . Bioprospecting of lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) inoculated with mycorrhiza under different rates of phosphorus for sustainable essential oil production. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(4): 916-929. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022056 |
[10] | Raulston Derrick Gillette, Norio Sakai, Godfrid Erasme Ibikoule . Role and impact of contract farming under various pricing standards: A case of Guyana's rice sector. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(1): 336-355. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024020 |
Agriculture today faces an exceptional challenge of producing adequate and healthy food for the burgeoning global human population, while seeking to optimize on the available natural resources. Coupled with emerging global challenges key among them, climate change, biodiversity loss and shrinking economies, the ability of contemporary agriculture to produce enough food for over nine billion people by year 2050 is unforeseen [1]. Although over the past decades, conventional agriculture is credited for improving global agricultural production [2], this, has been realized through intense economic and environmental pressure [3]. Key elements of high input agriculture include high fossil energy consumption, liberal use of agrochemicals (e.g., fertilizers and pesticides) and commercial varieties or hybrids that are by design bred to exploit such conditions. Conversely, there is growing global demand for healthier food, besides public concern about the negative ecological consequences of modern agriculture and soaring global prices of inorganic fertilizers. Therefore, to increase agricultural sustainability and conserve agroecosystems, there is growing interest in developing alternative agricultural systems that capitalize on biological processes such as organic agriculture.
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are members of a monophyletic phylum, the Glomeromycota [4] that form a mutualistic association with plant host roots. The fungal hyphae directly penetrates into the host's cortical cells forming arbuscules where nutrition exchange takes place, with extraradical hyphae spreading from colonized roots to the surrounding soil. AMF probably form the most widespread terrestrial symbiosis with approximately 92% of plant families, which include about 80% of land plant species [5,6]. According to fossil records, AMF have been in existence for more than 400 million years morphologically unaltered [7,8], possibly qualifying as one of the most successful living fossils [9]. Often, mycorrhizal symbiosis is critical for survival, growth and development of both fungal and plant symbiont because plants depend on fungus for nutrition and protection while the fungus relies on plants for carbohydrates [10]. Moreover, AMF are crucial in ecological functioning, physiology and productivity of land plants [4]. Although AMF spores can germinate without host plants regulatory mechanisms, AMF are obligately symbiotic, and therefore, depend on photosynthates from the plant host to complete their life cycle.
Organic agriculture has dramatically dilated over the past two decades with 50.9 million hectares of agricultural land currently under organic management (including in-conversion areas) [11]. Presently, Australia, Argentina and the United States are among the leading countries in acreage under organic cultivation, although the largest increases of organic agricultural land are in Europe [12]. More increase is foreseen because of the tremendous rise of market opportunities and numerous government mandates and incentives [13]. This outstanding growth is principally driven by increasing domestic market, since organic foods are perceived to be healthier and financial backing for organic producers. Thus, the current organic production does not, nonetheless, meet the local and export demand requiring more rapid expansion and research.
Organic agriculture, also called ecological agriculture refers to a production system that sustains human and environmental health by capitalizing on ecological processes and biodiversity that are adapted to local agro-climatic conditions, rather than the use of external inputs (http://www.ifoam.org/en/organic-landmarks/definition-organic-agriculture, accessed on 14/03/2018). Organic farming systems mimic natural ecosystems and rely on measures that stimulate resilience and sustainability of the agroecosystem, e.g., by enhancing crop and management diversification, incorporation of organic matter and beneficial microorganisms, to promote soil fertility, and by maximizing on nutrient cycles [14]. Crop pests and diseases are controlled through diverse rotations, while crop nutrition is maintained through the inclusion of legumes in the rotation and recycling of nutrients via crop residues and animal manures [15,16]. These tactics aim to improve sustainability of agricultural production by minimizing external inputs with adverse environmental effects while maintaining high crop yields and conserving biodiversity in agroecosystems [17,18].
Notwithstanding the tremendous rise, organic production is still limited by several agronomic and environmental factors such as varying soil fertility due to restricted application of mineral fertilizers, and lack of crop varieties adapted to organic systems. In addition, other emerging constraints to agriculture such as global climate change and resource pressure are likely to slow down the progress already made in organic farming. Therefore, novel approaches to foster local adaptation and effective exploitation of available bio-resources by organic crops are crucial. One such approach is functional agrobiodiversity recently hypothesized as potentially capable of improving crop yield and stability, produce quality, soil fertility and suppression of biotic and abiotic stresses [19].
On the other hand, conservation of sustainable soil fertility is particularly important in organic agriculture. Soil fertility and plant nutrition are enhanced through nitrogen (N) fixation by legumes and nutrient recycling of organic materials from animals and crops with limited application of external inputs [20]. The inclusion of cover crops used as green manure, living or dead mulch is important in enhancing biological processes and soil fertility, especially when farming system does not include animal husbandry [21]. Moreover, beneficial soil biota play a fundamental role in maintaining soil health and quality by regulating biogeochemical cycling of essential plant nutrients [22]. Therefore, to enhance productivity and sustainability in organic systems a more holistic approach targeting biological interactions among the main crop, cover crop and beneficial soil biota is needed.
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, often referred to as agroecosystem engineers, represent a key functional group of soil microbiota that are fundamental for soil fertility, crop productivity, yield quality and ecosystem resilience [23]. They form a critical symbiotic relationship with most agricultural crops improving the nutritional status of their hosts, besides protecting them against several soil-borne plant pathogens and environmental stresses. AMF enhance the uptake of phosphorus and nitrogen, and absorption of other immobile ions, such as zinc and copper by the host plant in return of about 20% of photosynthetic carbohydrates [24]. Thus this may enhance growth, production and produce quality of their hosts [25]. AMF protect their hosts against aggressive weeds [26,27], fungal, bacterial pathogens and nematodes [28], drought [29,30] heavy metals [31,32], salinity [33,34] and high temperature [35,36]. In addition, they improve soil structure and quality [37,38] mainly through the external hyphal network which creates a skeletal structure that enmeshes the soil particles [39,40], and by production of glomalin related soil protein (GRSP) which binds soil particles together [41].
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are a crucial component of organic cropping systems, where they provide nutritional and protective benefits in exchange for photosynthetic carbohydrates. Compared to conventional systems, where nutritional requirements are compensated by external fertilizers, AMF provide essential agroecosystem services (AES) to their host in organic systems, which rely more on ecological cycles than external inputs [42]. The utilization of AMF in organic farming is promising since organic fields are often richer in indigenous AMF propagules density and diversity compared to intensively cultivated farms [43,44,45,46] probably due to lower levels of soluble P and limited use of biocides [47]. Moreover, AMF activity in organic agriculture may be enhanced through diverse crop rotations that include host cover crops and cash crops [48,49], and inoculation where native populations are insufficient or ineffective [50,51]. Besides this, we can hypothesize that innovative diversification of these elements at different levels will increase AMF functionality, promoting soil fertility, crop production and produce quality.
Unlike contemporary farming systems where soil nutrients are compensated by external mineral fertilizers, organic systems mainly rely on ecological cycles and limited organic inputs for maintenance of soil fertility and crop productivity. This requires more ingenious management of farm resources to facilitate nutrient cycling and sustainable use of the available soil nutrients. Thus, beneficial soil microorganisms and in particular AMF are fundamental in ecological functioning and crop production in organic systems. Despite theoretical recognition of AMF potential in organic agroecosytems, practical application of mycorrhizal technology is still limited. Nonetheless, we must emphasize that the future of AMF in organic agriculture seems promising since now there is a growing body of research demonstrating increased mycorrhizal activity and function in organic systems e.g., [42,45,52,53]. Furthermore, we know that organic practices are less detrimental to AMF communities [54] and also promote AMF abundance and diversity [44,55] compared to conventional systems.
To enhance mycorrhizal symbiosis in organic agriculture four critical elements ought to be considered holistically within the scope on increased functional agrobiodiversity: (1) use of mycorrhizal cover crops especially during seasonal fallow; (2) inclusion of mycorrhizal crops in the rotation; (3) management practices that favor AMF such as reduced tillage and agrochemicals; (4) inoculation with effective AMF isolates, especially when native AMF propagules are low or ineffective. Moreover, since mycorrhizal symbiosis is a complex biological association, increased diversity of these elements is imperative to augment AMF community structure, which directly affects the diversity and productivity of plants [56,57]. Increased fungal diversity in agroecosystems may enhance more ecological functions due to niche differentiation (complementarity effect) and facilitation as well as presence of a particular effective AMF species (sampling effect) [58,59].
Until now, most of AMF studies in organic systems are limited to greenhouse experiments or a handful of field experiments characterized by organic-input substitution approach that involves substitution of inorganic inputs by organic inputs. Although the potential of AMF to enhance soil fertility, crop productivity and quality in diversified organic systems is well recognized [60], relatively few studies have been dedicated to this subject. Moreover, only a few studies [61,62] have been conducted globally on functionality of mycorrhizal symbiosis at different levels (i.e., species, genetic and habitat) of agrobiodiversity in organic systems. Although such field experiments are generally considered challenging to initiate (e.g., in establishment on a non-mycorrhizal control), they can generate very useful information since seasonal variations, environmental factors and microbial interactions contribute to the experimental outcome. Thus, results from field studies may provide practical solutions to the existing knowledge on mycorrhizal technology application in organic farming. Additionally, crop diversity-related field experiments may contribute to development of germplasms that are more adapted to the local conditions, a key element in organic farming. By holistically promoting diversity at all levels, ecological processes will be more enhanced effectively increasing soil fertility and crop productivity without incurring extra environmental and economical costs [63].
Cover crops are globally recognized as an important agronomic management practice for organic and low-input agriculture because of their contributions to soil health, reduction of nutrient leaching, weed suppression, maintaining and restoring soil biodiversity and to crop performance [64,65,66]. They provide a wide range of AES, including availing valuable plant nutrients, control soil erosion and nutrient leaching, interrupt pest, disease and weed cycles and maintenance of soil biodiversity [67]. Cover crops are particularly important in replacing or supplementing fertilizer N with residual N through N2 fixation by leguminous cover crops or scavenging of residual available N by cereal cover crops or microbial decomposition of cover crop residues [68].
Cover crop management mainly depends on the intended use as green manure, living mulch or dead mulch. In countries that experience winter, cover crops are seeded in late summer or early fall and maintained in the field through winter and spring. Towards the end of spring, the cover crop biomass is either destroyed and incorporated into the soil by turning under or mowed and left on the soil surface as a dead surface mulch [21]. Turning under generally enhances microbial decomposition of the cover crop biomass compared to surface mulch, although it decreases the exposure of biomass to air and atmospheric agents. This may also negatively affect AMF symbiosis similar to tillage although this perspective has not been critically examined.
Cover crops may indirectly affect crop productivity by influencing rhizospheric soil microbiota, particularly AMF [48,69,70]. Since AMF are obligate mutualists, cover crops maintain or increase soil mycorrhizal propagules by providing them with photosynthates, especially during winter or fallow periods [64,71,72,73,74]. However, some cover crops e.g., Brassicas are nonmycorrhizal, and additionally produce mycotoxic glucosinolates upon tissue disruption negatively affecting AMF communities [75]. Until now, there are conflicting reports, either negative [76,77] or neutral [78,79], on the effects of Brassica crops (either as cover crop or main crop) on soil mycorrhizal potential and root colonization of the subsequent crop. Thus, to determine the effect of cover crops on soil mycorrhizal potential it would be necessary to have large scale field experiments incorporating contrasting host and not-host cover crops.
The intended benefits of cover crops depend on the cover crop species, composition, prevailing environmental conditions, and the management of field activities. Cover crops can be grown as monocultures or as diverse mixture of species, where the latter aims to optimize resource use efficiency and the associated AES (Figure 1). Although the use of single cover crop species is well documented [65,80,81], relatively little information is available globally on cover crop mixtures. Cover crop diversification may increase the aboveground biomass, the amount of N fixed, weed suppression, soil biodiversity and promote timely decomposition of the cover crop biomass depending on the crop needs by moderating C:N ratios [67]. Moreover, cover crops mixtures may be more tolerant to adverse environmental conditions than monocultures, thus promoting resilience especially in the present era of unpredictable weather patterns.
Cover crops benefits mainly depend on the crop species and agronomic management practices. While some cover crops, especially legumes, support a rich beneficial soil biota, others e.g., non-mycorrhizal hosts such as brassicas, contain allelochemicals that could be deleterious to beneficial soil biota, thus affecting delivery of essential ecological services to crops. Hitherto, it remains contentious whether non-host cover crops negatively affect soil mycorrhizal potential, root colonization and growth of the succeeding crops. To optimize the use of cover crops, cover crop mixtures (cocktails) are especially important (Figure 1) since they are viewed as more productive, resilient and adaptable to local conditions providing a wider range of ecological services [82,83].
Previous crops affect the performance of the subsequent crops through various mechanisms which include changes in water and nutrient use efficiency, pest and pathogenic microorganisms' interactions, soil quality and biodiversity. Crop rotations and sequences are aimed at obtaining stable and higher crop yields besides enhancing agroecosystem resilience. Generally, crop genotypes even within crop cultivars in a single species may have more dramatic effects on mycorrhizal symbiosis. One way of increasing AMF propagules, diversity and functioning is through diversified crop rotations and sequences. In this case, crops that are well documented for positive plant-mycorrhizal interactions should be incorporated [22]. Some of the best bet mycorrhizal crops that augment indigenous AMF propagules include certain cultivars of cereals such as wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) [76,84]. Moreover, the previous crop mycorrhizal interaction may influence the soil mycorrhizal infection potential and root colonization of the succeeding crop as recently demonstrated using sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and mustard (Brassica alba Boiss) in 17 different soils [85].
On the other hand, leguminous crops have the ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen through symbiosis with rhizobia, and can also host AMF, which in return provides the plant with mineral nutrients. The presence of each microbial symbiont has been shown to affect the activity of the other and the interaction of both microbial symbionts can be detected on the host plant [24]. This interaction among the three organisms results in a mutualistic tripartite symbiosis [86]. Studies have also shown that co-inoculation of cowpea with bradyrhizobia and AMF [87,88] has synergistic effect in alleviating nutrient deficiencies through the enhancement of plant nutrients uptake [89]. Since legumes can host AMF and N fixing bacteria at the same time, the tripartite symbiosis of AMF-rhizobia-legume assumes more significance in terms of improving soil fertility and crop productivity.
Besides, agricultural weed species can either be mycorrhizal, weakly mycorrhizal or non hosts, exhibiting varied response to AMF [90]. Therefore, allowing mycorrhizal weeds to grow alongside other crops during rotations and sequences sustain AMF propagules during growth of non host crops such as Brassica or during fallow periods. This envisages an interesting perspective in organic weed management, where some weeds may form an essential component of agrobiodiversity providing alternative hosts to AMF during growth of non host crops. Moreover, weeds growing within the main crop could be beneficial where there are mycorrhizal non hosts within the rotation [91], provided they are not too competitive against the cash crop. At the time of weed termination and seedbed preparation, practices that embrace conservation tillage and reduced pesticide and fertilizer application should be prioritized since they favor plant mycorrrhizal interactions [92].
Conventional agriculture is dependent on the utilization of specific crop varieties or hybrids that are bred specifically to exploit high-input conditions. Many crop varieties (about 95%) grown in organic agriculture today were bred under high-input agriculture systems [93]. Although modern genetically uniform cultivars bred for specific characteristics are well developed to cope with certain stress, they are unlikely to cope with the greater site-to-site and seasonal fluctuations experienced in organic agriculture fields. This is overarched by the increasing challenges in agriculture, mainly as a result of climate instability, biodiversity loss and declining resources. Thus, the interaction of climate change and resource constraint dictates the need to base future agricultural production increasingly on diverse crop cultivars and ecological cycles.
Contemporary bred hybrids are usually selected for high input conditions where soil nutrients are not limiting. Consequently, modern hybrids, especially cereals [94,95], may portray reduced mycorrhizal dependency and responsiveness. Besides this, crop species and even cultivars belonging to same species may respond differently to AMF depending on the prevailing soil conditions [88,96]. By contrast, soil nutrients are often limiting in organic agriculture, necessitating optimization of ecological cycles for crop productivity. Thus, a profitable use of AMF in organic farming will require crop breeding programs that take into account existing AMF response variations within crop genotypes.
To overcome some of the challenges caused by large-scale monocultures there is growing interest to increase within field crop diversity in organic agriculture. There are two main approaches to create diversity, which include: use of varietal mixtures or Composite Cross Populations (CCPs). The two approaches differ in the way in which the cultivars are created, i.e., by crossing for CCPs, and by physical mixing seeds of different varieties for varietal mixtures [97]. CCPs are developed through evolutionary breeding by subjecting crop populations with a high level of genetic diversity to forces of natural selection for several cropping seasons [14]. Those adapted to local growing conditions are expected to contribute more seeds to the consecutive generations eventually leading to breeding of crop populations that are fully adapted to the local conditions under which they are grow. Despite the clear value of variety mixtures and CCPs [98], their adoption by organic farmers' remains limited mainly because relatively little is yet known about them in terms of adaptation, stability and productivity.
Although AMF are ubiquitous soil microorganisms, inoculation with efficient isolates is one of the major agronomic practices that targets to improve the functionaly of indigenous AMF [99,100]. Numerous studies have reported beneficial effects of inoculation on root colonization and crop performance especially where indigenous AMF populations are infective, or low soil mycorrhizal infection potential [50,88,101,102]. However, although the introduced isolates are generally prescreened and considered more symbiotically superior to the indigenous isolates, some studies have reported minimal benefits mainly associated to less competitive AMF ecotypes compared to native species [103,104,105]. Besides, crop sequences or rotations that exclude AMF host crops, and extended fallow periods may hinder the establishment of introduced isolates [106].
One of the main obstacles of AMF inoculation in the field is the biotrophic nature of AMF which requires initial production of crude inoculum using different host plants. The resultant inocula is usually bulky and laborous to apply on large scale. This may steeply increase the production and application costs when large quantity of efficient and reliable AMF inoculum is needed [107,108]. Besides this, since many commercial AMF inoculants often contain a single fungal isolate mostly of Glomus genus, this may alter the community structure of the native AMF community through either positive or negative microbial interactions [109]. Moreover, competition or negative interactions with resident fungal endophytes, especially at juvenile plant stages, and environmental stress may consequently reduce the effectiveness of the introduced isolates.
An alternative strategy aimed at increasing AMF symbiosis in horticultural crops is where plantlets are pre-inoculated with AMF isolates at nursery. Here, the mycorrhizal inoculum is homogenously mixed with a sterile seeding substrate used for the pre-germination of the seedlings. Therefore, plant-AMF interaction is established at a juvenile stage and in the absence of other rhizospheric microorganisms that often compete for root space in the field [22]. At transplanting, the introduced AMF isolates have established intermittent symbiosis with the host crop and are well established to thrive in field conditions. Therefore, optimal AMF colonization at early crop stages is achieved which promotes uptake of essential plant nutrients when they are much needed. In such cases, the nursery AMF inoculants should be screened for functional diversity to incorporate AMF species that promote plant productivity, yield quality and tolerance to abiotic stresses. This approach is cheaper in cost and labor than direct field inoculation especially due mycotrophic nature of AMF, and has been proved effective for horticultural crops [110]. Moreover, since AMF colonization and responsiveness vary based on crop cultivars [95,111,112], the genotypes used in nursery should be ingeniously screened for AMF symbiosis.
In general, there is rising global trade of AMF commercial inocula and increased application of exotic AMF in both conventional and organic agriculture [100]. However, it is still unclear how the introduction of exotic AMF isolates affects the resident AMF diversity and community composition and structure. Ecologically, this may have serious consequences, due to introduction of new invasive isolates wipe out the indegenous populations altering the natural soil biodiversity [100,113,114]. Therefore, besides effectivess in promoting crop nutrition, isolates for commercial purposes should be by and large screened for other useful agroecologic effects such as their effect on soil biodiversity.
Organic agriculture is increasingly being recognized as a potential strategy to produce healthier food, conserve biodiversity and reduce off-farm inputs in agricultural landscapes [55]. Despite the remarkable rise in organic production over the last 20 years, organic farming is still faced with a number of agronomic and environmental challenges that could derail its future progress. Given the high variability in organic systems coupled with emerging global challenges like climate change, environmental pollution and biodiversity loss, novel cropping systems based on increased agrobiodiversity are imperative. These will provide better AES e.g., soil biodiversity, fertility and quality [115], weed and pest suppression [116], promoting sustainable crop production and quality [117]. Thus, agronomic practices such as diverse microbial inoculation, right choice of cover crops mixtures and incorporating highly mycorrhizal host crops in rotations and sequences (functional diversity, [19]), may have a great potential in promoting organic crop productivity via enhanced mycorrhizal symbiosis. Moreover, the development of complementary mixtures will further promote expression of both generic and specific agroecosystem functions in organic agriculture thus contributing to soil fertility, crop growth, yield and produce quality.
The author declares no conflict of interest.
[1] |
Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR, et al. (2010) Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327: 812–818. doi: 10.1126/science.1185383
![]() |
[2] |
Bainard L, Klironomos J, Gordon A (2011) The mycorrhizal status and colonization of 26 tree species growing in urban and rural environments. Mycorrhiza 21: 91–96. doi: 10.1007/s00572-010-0314-6
![]() |
[3] |
Tilman D (1998) The greening of the green revolution. Nature 396: 211–212. doi: 10.1038/24254
![]() |
[4] |
Schüßler A, Schwarzott D, Walker C (2001) A new fungal phylum, the Glomeromycota: Phylogeny and evolution. Mycol Res 105: 1413–1421. doi: 10.1017/S0953756201005196
![]() |
[5] |
Fitter AH (2005) Darkness visible: Reflections on underground ecology. J Ecol 93: 231–243. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-0477.2005.00990.x
![]() |
[6] |
Wang B, Qiu YL (2006) Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants. Mycorrhiza 16: 299–363. doi: 10.1007/s00572-005-0033-6
![]() |
[7] |
Redecker D, Kodner R, Graham LE (2000) Glomalean fungi from the Ordovician. Science 289: 1920–1921. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5486.1920
![]() |
[8] |
Krings M, Taylor TN, Hass H, et al. (2007) Fungal endophytes in a 400-million-yr-old land plant: Infection pathways, spatial distribution, and host responses. New Phytol 174: 648–657. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02008.x
![]() |
[9] |
Parniske M (2008) Arbuscular mycorrhiza: The mother of plant root endosymbioses. Nat Rev Micro 6: 763–775. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1987
![]() |
[10] |
Pandey M, Sharma J, Taylor DL, et al. (2013) A narrowly endemic photosynthetic orchid is non-specific in its mycorrhizal associations. Mol Ecol 22: 2341–2354. doi: 10.1111/mec.12249
![]() |
[11] | Willer H, Lernoud J (2017) The world of organic agriculture-statistics and emerging trends 2017, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL. |
[12] | Willer H, Kilcher L (2012) (Eds.) The world of organic agriculture-statistics and emerging trends 2012, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), Bonn. |
[13] |
Letourneau DK, Bothwell SG (2008) Comparison of organic and conventional farms: Challenging ecologists to make biodiversity functional. Front Ecol Environ 6: 430–438. doi: 10.1890/070081
![]() |
[14] |
Wolfe MS, Baresel JP, Desclaux D, et al. (2008) Developments in breeding cereals for organic agriculture. Euphytica 163: 323–346. doi: 10.1007/s10681-008-9690-9
![]() |
[15] |
Lotter DW (2003) Organic agriculture. J Sustain Agr 21: 59–128. doi: 10.1300/J064v21n04_06
![]() |
[16] |
Watson CA, Atkinson D, Gosling P, et al. (2002) Managing soil fertility in organic farming systems. Soil Use Manage 18: 239–247. doi: 10.1079/SUM2002131
![]() |
[17] |
Gosling P, Ozaki A, Jones J, et al. (2010) Organic management of tilled agricultural soils results in a rapid increase in colonisation potential and spore populations of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Agr Ecosyst Environ 139: 273–279. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2010.08.013
![]() |
[18] |
Bengtsson J, Ahnström J, Weibull AC (2005) The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: A meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 42: 261–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01005.x
![]() |
[19] | Costanzo A, Bàrberi P (2013) Functional agrobiodiversity and agroecosystem services in sustainable wheat production. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 34: 327–348. |
[20] |
Gosling P, Shepherd M (2005) Long-term changes in soil fertility in organic arable farming systems in England, with particular reference to phosphorus and potassium. Agr Ecosyst Environ 105: 425–432. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2004.03.007
![]() |
[21] |
Lenzi A, Antichi D, Bigongiali F, et al. (2009) Effect of different cover crops on organic tomato production. Renew Agr Food Syst 24: 92–101. doi: 10.1017/S1742170508002445
![]() |
[22] | Jeffries P, Gianinazzi S, Turnau K, et al. (2003) The contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in sustainable maintenance of plant health and soil fertility. Biol Fert Soils 37: 1–16. |
[23] |
Gianinazzi S, Gollotte A, Binet MN, et al. (2010) Agroecology: the key role of arbuscular mycorrhizas in ecosystem services. Mycorrhiza 20: 519–530. doi: 10.1007/s00572-010-0333-3
![]() |
[24] | Smith SE, Read D (2008) Mycorrhizal symbiosis (Third Edition), Academic Press, London. |
[25] | Berta G, Copetta A, Gamalero E, et al. (2013) Maize development and grain quality are differentially affected by mycorrhizal fungi and a growth-promoting pseudomonad in the field. Mycorrhiza 24: 161–170. |
[26] |
Rinaudo V, Barberi P, Giovannetti M, et al. (2010) Mycorrhizal fungi suppress aggressive agricultural weeds. Plant Soil 333: 7–20. doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-0202-z
![]() |
[27] |
Veiga RSL, Jansa J, Frossard E, et al. (2011) Can Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduce the growth of agricultural weeds? PLoS One 6: e27825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027825
![]() |
[28] |
Veresoglou SD, Rillig MC (2012) Suppression of fungal and nematode plant pathogens through arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Biol Letters 8: 214–217. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0874
![]() |
[29] |
Augé RM (2001) Water relations, drought and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Mycorrhiza 11: 3–42. doi: 10.1007/s005720100097
![]() |
[30] | Pavithra D, Yapa N (2018) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation enhances drought stress tolerance of plants. Groundwater for Sustainable Development. |
[31] | Bothe H, Regvar M, Turnau K (2010) Arbuscular mycorrhiza, heavy metal, and salt tolerance, soil heavy metals, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 87–111. |
[32] |
Forgy D (2012) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can benefit heavy metal tolerance and phytoremediation. J Nat Resour Life Sci Educ 41: 23–26. doi: 10.4195/jnrlse.2012.0001se
![]() |
[33] |
Wang Y, Wang M, Li Y, et al. (2018) Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and nitrogen uptake of Chrysanthemum morifolium under salt stress. PLoS One 13: e0196408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196408
![]() |
[34] | Miransari M (2017) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soil salinity, in: Johnson, N.C. et al. Eds., Mycorrhizal Mediation of Soil, Elsevier, 263–277. |
[35] |
Mathur S, Sharma MP, Jajoo A (2018) Improved photosynthetic efficacy of maize (Zea mays) plants with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) under high temperature stress. J Photoch Photobio B 180: 149–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.02.002
![]() |
[36] | Zhu X, Song F, Liu F (2017) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and tolerance of temperature stress in plants, in: Wu, Q.S. Eds., Arbuscular Mycorrhizas and Stress Tolerance of Plants, Springer Singapore, Singapore, 163–194. |
[37] |
Rillig MC (2004) Arbuscular mycorrhizae, glomalin, and soil aggregation. Can J Soil Sci 84: 355–363. doi: 10.4141/S04-003
![]() |
[38] |
Bedini S, Pellegrino E, Avio L, et al. (2009) Changes in soil aggregation and glomalin-related soil protein content as affected by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species Glomus mosseae and Glomus intraradices. Soil Biol Biochem 41: 1491–1496. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.04.005
![]() |
[39] |
Cardoso IM, Kuyper TW (2006) Mycorrhizas and tropical soil fertility. Agr Ecosyst Environ 116: 72–84. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.03.011
![]() |
[40] | Giovannetti M, Avio L (2002) Biotechnology of arbuscular mycorrhizas, in: GK George and KA Dilip, Eds., Applied Mycology and Biotechnology, Elsevier, 275–310. |
[41] |
Wright SF, Upadhyaya A (1996) Extraction of an abundant and unusual protein from soil and comparison with hyphal protein of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Sci 161: 575–586. doi: 10.1097/00010694-199609000-00003
![]() |
[42] | Njeru EM, Avio L, Sbrana C, et al. (2013) First evidence for a major cover crop effect on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and organic maize growth. Agron Sustain Dev 34: 841–848. |
[43] |
Avio L, Castaldini M, Fabiani A, et al. (2013) Impact of nitrogen fertilization and soil tillage on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in a Mediterranean agroecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 67: 285–294. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.09.005
![]() |
[44] |
Oehl F, Sieverding E, Mäder P, et al. (2004) Impact of long-term conventional and organic farming on the diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Oecologia 138: 574–583. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1458-2
![]() |
[45] |
Mäder P, Edenhofer S, Boller T, et al. (2000) Arbuscular mycorrhizae in a long-term field trial comparing low-input (organic, biological) and high-input (conventional) farming systems in a crop rotation. Biol Fert Soils 31: 150–156. doi: 10.1007/s003740050638
![]() |
[46] | Njeru EM, Avio L, Bocci G, et al. (2014) Contrasting effects of cover crops on 'hot spot' arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in organic tomato. Biol Fert Soils 51: 151–166. |
[47] |
Raviv M (2010) The use of mycorrhiza in organically-grown crops under semi arid conditions: A review of benefits, constraints and future challenges. Symbiosis 52: 65–74. doi: 10.1007/s13199-010-0089-8
![]() |
[48] |
Karasawa T, Takebe M (2012) Temporal or spatial arrangements of cover crops to promote arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization and P uptake of upland crops grown after nonmycorrhizal crops. Plant Soil 353: 355–366. doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-1036-z
![]() |
[49] |
Lehmann A, Barto EK, Powell J, et al. (2012) Mycorrhizal responsiveness trends in annual crop plants and their wild relatives-a meta-analysis on studies from 1981 to 2010. Plant Soil 355: 231–250. doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-1095-1
![]() |
[50] |
Conversa G, Lazzizera C, Bonasia A, et al. (2013) Yield and phosphorus uptake of a processing tomato crop grown at different phosphorus levels in a calcareous soil as affected by mycorrhizal inoculation under field conditions. Biol Fert Soils 49: 691–703. doi: 10.1007/s00374-012-0757-3
![]() |
[51] |
Douds Jr DD, Reider C (2003) Inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi increases the yield of green peppers in a high P soil. Biol Agric Hortic 21: 91–102. doi: 10.1080/01448765.2003.9755251
![]() |
[52] |
Bedini S, Avio L, Sbrana C, et al. (2013) Mycorrhizal activity and diversity in a long-term organic Mediterranean agroecosystem. Biol Fert Soils 49: 781–790. doi: 10.1007/s00374-012-0770-6
![]() |
[53] |
Harrier LA, Watson CA (2004) The potential role of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi in the bioprotection of plants against soil-borne pathogens in organic and/or other sustainable farming systems. Pest Manag Sci 60: 149–157. doi: 10.1002/ps.820
![]() |
[54] | Ryan MH, Tibbett M (2008) The role of arbuscular mycorrhizas in organic farming, in: Kirchmann, H. Bergström, L. Eds., Organic Crop Production-Ambitions and Limitations Springer Netherlands. 189–229. |
[55] |
Verbruggen E, Röling WFM, Gamper HA, et al. (2010) Positive effects of organic farming on below-ground mutualists: Large-scale comparison of mycorrhizal fungal communities in agricultural soils. New Phytol 186: 968–979. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03230.x
![]() |
[56] |
Van der Heijden MGA, Klironomos JN, Ursic M, et al. (1998) Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature 396: 69–72. doi: 10.1038/23932
![]() |
[57] |
Wang F, Hu J, Lin X, et al. (2011) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community structure and diversity in response to long-term fertilization: A field case from China. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27: 67–74. doi: 10.1007/s11274-010-0427-2
![]() |
[58] |
Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, et al. (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75: 3–35. doi: 10.1890/04-0922
![]() |
[59] |
Fargione J, Tilman D, Dybzinski R, et al. (2007) From selection to complementarity: Shifts in the causes of biodiversity–productivity relationships in a long-term biodiversity experiment. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 274: 871–876. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.0351
![]() |
[60] |
Gosling P, Hodge A, Goodlass G, et al. (2006) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and organic farming. Agr Ecosyst Environ 113: 17–35. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.09.009
![]() |
[61] |
Njeru EM, Bocci G, Avio L, et al. (2017) Functional identity has a stronger effect than diversity on mycorrhizal symbiosis and productivity of field grown organic tomato. Eur J Agron 86: 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2017.02.007
![]() |
[62] |
Costanzo A, Bàrberi P (2016) Field scale functional agrobiodiversity in organic wheat: Effects on weed reduction, disease susceptibility and yield. Eur J Agron 76: 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2016.01.012
![]() |
[63] |
Gomiero T, Pimentel D, Paoletti MG (2011) Environmental impact of different agricultural management practices: Conventional vs. organic agriculture. Crit Rev Plant Sci 30: 95–124. doi: 10.1080/07352689.2011.554355
![]() |
[64] |
Kabir Z, Koide RT (2002) Effect of autumn and winter mycorrhizal cover crops on soil properties, nutrient uptake and yield of sweet corn in Pennsylvania, USA. Plant Soil 238: 205–215. doi: 10.1023/A:1014408723664
![]() |
[65] |
Weil R, Kremen A (2007) Thinking across and beyond disciplines to make cover crops pay. J Sci Food Agric 87: 551–557. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2742
![]() |
[66] |
Bàrberi P, Mazzoncini M (2001) Changes in weed community composition as influenced by cover crop and management system in continuous corn. Weed Sci 49: 491–499. doi: 10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0491:CIWCCA]2.0.CO;2
![]() |
[67] | Creamer NG, Bennett MA, Stinner BR, et al. (1996) A comparison of four processing tomato production systems differing in cover crop and chemical inputs. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 121: 559–568. |
[68] |
Lawson A, Fortuna AM, Cogger C, et al. (2013) Nitrogen contribution of rye–hairy vetch cover crop mixtures to organically grown sweet corn. Renew Agr Food Syst 28: 59–69. doi: 10.1017/S1742170512000014
![]() |
[69] |
Carrera LM, Buyer JS, Vinyard B, et al. (2007) Effects of cover crops, compost, and manure amendments on soil microbial community structure in tomato production systems. Appl Soil Ecol 37: 247–255. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.08.003
![]() |
[70] |
Buyer JS, Teasdale JR, Roberts DP, et al. (2010) Factors affecting soil microbial community structure in tomato cropping systems. Soil Biol Biochem 42: 831–841. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.01.020
![]() |
[71] |
Boswell EP, Koide RT, Shumway DL, et al (1998) Winter wheat cover cropping, VA mycorrhizal fungi and maize growth and yield. Agr Ecosyst Environ 67: 55–65. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(97)00094-7
![]() |
[72] |
Kabir Z, Koide RT (2000) The effect of dandelion or a cover crop on mycorrhiza inoculum potential, soil aggregation and yield of maize. Agr Ecosyst Environ 78: 167–174. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00121-8
![]() |
[73] |
Lehman RM, Taheri WI, Osborne SL, et al. (2012) Fall cover cropping can increase arbuscular mycorrhizae in soils supporting intensive agricultural production. Appl Soil Ecol 61: 300–304. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.11.008
![]() |
[74] |
Galvez L, Douds DD, Wagoner P, et al. (1995) An overwintering cover crop increases inoculum of VAM fungi in agricultural soil. Am J Altern Agric 10: 152–156. doi: 10.1017/S0889189300006391
![]() |
[75] | Black R, Tinker PB (1979) The development of endomycorrhizal root systems II. Effect of agronomic factors and soil conditions on the development of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in barley and on the endophyte spore density. New Phytol 83: 401–413. |
[76] |
Monreal MA, Grant CA, Irvine RB, et al. (2011) Crop management effect on arbuscular mycorrhizae and root growth of flax. Can J Plant Sci 91: 315–324. doi: 10.4141/CJPS10136
![]() |
[77] |
Gavito ME, Miller MH (1998) Changes in mycorrhiza development in maize induced by crop management practices. Plant Soil 198: 185–192. doi: 10.1023/A:1004314406653
![]() |
[78] |
White CM, Weil RR (2010) Forage radish and cereal rye cover crop effects on mycorrhizal fungus colonization of maize roots. Plant Soil 328: 507–521. doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-0131-x
![]() |
[79] | Pellerin S, Mollier A, Morel C, et al. (2007) Effect of incorporation of Brassica napus L. residues in soils on mycorrhizal fungus colonisation of roots and phosphorus uptake by maize (Zea mays L.). Eur J Agron 26: 113–120. |
[80] |
Moonen AC, Bàrberi P (2006) An ecological approach to study the physical and chemical effects of rye cover crop residues on Amaranthus retroflexus, Echinochloa crus-galli and maize. Ann Appl Biol 148: 73–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2006.00038.x
![]() |
[81] |
Wyland LJ, Jackson LE, Chaney WE, et al. (1996) Winter cover crops in a vegetable cropping system: Impacts on nitrate leaching, soil water, crop yield, pests and management costs. Agr Ecosyst Environ 59: 1–17. doi: 10.1016/0167-8809(96)01048-1
![]() |
[82] | Creamer NG, Bennett MA, Stinner BR (1997) Evaluation of cover crop mixtures for use in vegetable production systems. Hort Sci 32: 866–870. |
[83] |
Groff S (2008) Mixtures and cocktails: Soil is meant to be covered. J Soil Water Conserv 63: 110–111. doi: 10.2489/jswc.63.4.110A
![]() |
[84] |
Koide RT, Peoples MS (2012) On the nature of temporary yield loss in maize following canola. Plant Soil 360: 259–269. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1237-0
![]() |
[85] |
Karasawa T, Kasahara Y, Takebe M (2001) Variable response of growth and arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of maize plants to preceding crops in various types of soils. Biol Fert Soils 33: 286–293. doi: 10.1007/s003740000321
![]() |
[86] | Antunes PM, Goss MJ (2005) Communication in the tripartite symbiosis formed by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, rhizobia and legume plants: A review, Agronomy Monograph No.48, Madison: American Society of Agronomy, 199–222. |
[87] |
de Varennes A, Goss MJ (2007) The tripartite symbiosis between legumes, rhizobia and indigenous mycorrhizal fungi is more efficient in undisturbed soil. Soil Biol Biochem 39: 2603–2607. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.05.007
![]() |
[88] |
Oruru MB, Njeru EM, Pasquet R, et al. (2018) Response of a wild-type and modern cowpea cultivars to arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation in sterilized and non-sterilized soil. J Plant Nutr 41: 90–101. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2017.1381728
![]() |
[89] | Verma M, Brar SK, Tyagi RD, et al. (2007) Antagonistic fungi, Trichoderma spp.: Panoply of biological control. Biochem Eng J 37: 1–20. |
[90] |
Vatovec C, Jordan N, Huerd S (2005) Responsiveness of certain agronomic weed species to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Renew Agr Food Syst 20: 181–189. doi: 10.1079/RAF2005115
![]() |
[91] | Atkinson D, Baddeley JA, Goicoechea N, et al. (2002) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in low input agriculture, ycorrhizal technology in agriculture, 211–222. |
[92] |
Nyamwange MM, Njeru EM, Mucheru-Muna M, et al. (2018) Soil management practices affect arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi propagules, root colonization and growth of rainfed maize. AIMS Agric Food 3: 120–134. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2018.2.120
![]() |
[93] |
Lammerts van Bueren ET, Jones SS, Tamm L, et al. (2011) The need to breed crop varieties suitable for organic farming, using wheat, tomato and broccoli as examples: A review. NJAS Wagen J Life Sci 58: 193–205. doi: 10.1016/j.njas.2010.04.001
![]() |
[94] |
Zhu YG, Smith SE, Barritt AR, et al. (2001) Phosphorus (P) efficiencies and mycorrhizal responsiveness of old and modern wheat cultivars. Plant Soil 237: 249–255. doi: 10.1023/A:1013343811110
![]() |
[95] |
Singh AK, Hamel C, DePauw RM, et al. (2012) Genetic variability in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi compatibility supports the selection of durum wheat genotypes for enhancing soil ecological services and cropping systems in Canada. Can J Microbiol 58: 293–302. doi: 10.1139/w11-140
![]() |
[96] |
Tawaraya K (2003) Arbuscular mycorrhizal dependency of different plant species and cultivars. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 49: 655–668. doi: 10.1080/00380768.2003.10410323
![]() |
[97] |
Döring TF, Knapp S, Kovacs G, et al. (2011) Evolutionary Plant Breeding in Cereals-Into a New Era. Sustainability 3: 1944–1971. doi: 10.3390/su3101944
![]() |
[98] |
Kiær LP, Skovgaard IM, Østergard H (2009) Grain yield increase in cereal variety mixtures: A meta-analysis of field trials. Field Crops Res 114: 361–373. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.09.006
![]() |
[99] | Oruru MB, Njeru EM (2016) Upscaling arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and related agroecosystems services in smallholder farming systems. Biomed Res Int 2016: 4376240. |
[100] |
Schwartz MW, Hoeksema JD, Gehring CA, et al. (2006) The promise and the potential consequences of the global transport of mycorrhizal fungal inoculum. Ecol Lett 9: 501–515. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00910.x
![]() |
[101] |
Wang FY, Tong RJ, Shi ZY, et al. (2011) Inoculations with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase vegetable yields and decrease phoxim concentrations in carrot and green onion and their soils. PLoS One 6: e16949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016949
![]() |
[102] |
Douds Jr DD, Nagahashi G, Reider C, et al. (2007) Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increases the yield of potatoes in a high P soil. Biol Agric Hortic 25: 67–78. doi: 10.1080/01448765.2007.10823209
![]() |
[103] | Muok BO, Matsumura A, Ishii T, et al (2009) The effect of intercropping Sclerocarya birrea (A. Rich.) Hochst, millet and corn in the presence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Afr J Biotechnol 8: 807–812. |
[104] |
White JA, Tallaksen J, Charvat I (2008) The effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation at a roadside prairie restoration site. Mycologia 100: 6–11. doi: 10.1080/15572536.2008.11832494
![]() |
[105] | Garland BC, Schroeder-Moreno MS, Fernandez GE, et al (2011) Influence of summer cover crops and mycorrhizal fungi on strawberry production in the Southeastern United States. HortSci 46: 985–991. |
[106] |
Douds Jr DD, Millner PD (1999) Biodiversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in agroecosystems. Agr Ecosyst Environ 74: 77–93. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00031-6
![]() |
[107] |
Saito M, Marumoto T (2002) Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: The status quo in Japan and the future prospects. Plant Soil 244: 273–279. doi: 10.1023/A:1020287900415
![]() |
[108] | Brito I, De Carvalho M, Goss MJ (2011) Summer survival of arbuscular mycorrhiza extraradical mycelium and the potential for its management through tillage options in Mediterranean cropping systems. Soil Use Manage 27: 350–356. |
[109] |
Antunes P, Koch A, Dunfield K, et al. (2009) Influence of commercial inoculation with Glomus intraradices on the structure and functioning of an AM fungal community from an agricultural site. Plant Soil 317: 257–266. doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9806-y
![]() |
[110] | Campanelli A, Ruta C, Tagarelli A, et al. (2011) Nursery inoculation with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus viscosum and its effect on the growth and physiology of hybrid artichoke seedlings. Ital J Agron 6: 159–164. |
[111] | An GH, Kobayashi S, Enoki H, et al. (2010) How does arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization vary with host plant genotype? An example based on maize germplasms. Plant Soil 327: 441–453. |
[112] | Turrini A, Giordani T, Avio L, et al. (2015) Large variation in mycorrhizal colonization among wild accessions, cultivars, and inbreds of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Euphytica 207: 331–342. |
[113] |
Pellegrino E, Turrini A, Gamper HA, et al. (2012) Establishment, persistence and effectiveness of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculants in the field revealed using molecular genetic tracing and measurement of yield components. New Phytol 194: 810–822. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04090.x
![]() |
[114] |
Janoušková M, Krak K, Wagg C, et al (2013) Effects of inocula additions in presence of a pre-established arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community. Appl Environ Microbiol 79: 6507– 6515. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02135-13
![]() |
[115] |
Brussaard L, de Ruiter PC, Brown GG (2007) Soil biodiversity for agricultural sustainability. Agr Ecosyst Environ 121: 233–244. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.013
![]() |
[116] |
Tooker JF, Frank SD (2012) Genotypically diverse cultivar mixtures for insect pest management and increased crop yields. J Appl Ecol 49: 974–985. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02173.x
![]() |
[117] |
Himanen SJ, Ketoja E, Hakala K, et al. (2013) Cultivar diversity has great potential to increase yield of feed barley. Agron Sustain Dev 33: 519–530. doi: 10.1007/s13593-012-0120-y
![]() |
1. | Ezekiel Mugendi Njeru, Morris Muthini, Mercy Martha Muindi, Omwoyo Ombori, Shem Bonuke Nchore, Steve Runo, John M. Maingi, 2020, Chapter 27, 978-3-030-37536-2, 471, 10.1007/978-3-030-37537-9_27 | |
2. | Turnau Katarzyna, Lingua Guido, Gianinazzi Silvio, 2021, 9780128221228, 333, 10.1016/B978-0-12-822122-8.00011-X | |
3. | Nirmal Philip George, Joseph George Ray, The inevitability of arbuscular mycorrhiza for sustainability in organic agriculture—A critical review, 2023, 7, 2571-581X, 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1124688 | |
4. | Barbara Łata, Radosław Łaźny, Sebastian Przybyłko, Dariusz Wrona, Malus Antioxidant Metabolism Following Bacterial–Fungal Inoculation in Organic Farming: From Root to Fruit, 2021, 11, 2076-3417, 9466, 10.3390/app11209466 | |
5. | Dietrich Knorr, Mary Ann Augustin, Food systems at a watershed: Unlocking the benefits of technology and ecosystem symbioses, 2022, 1040-8398, 1, 10.1080/10408398.2021.2023092 | |
6. | Devinia Princess Akinyi, Stanley Karanja Ng’ang’a, Evan Hartunian Girvetz, Trade-offs and synergies of climate change adaptation strategies among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review, 2021, 2, 2666660X, 130, 10.1016/j.regsus.2021.05.002 | |
7. | Adrien Byamungu Ndeko, Abdalah Gamby Diedhiou, Salliou Fall, Diegane Diouf, Hassna Funoune-Mboup, Gustave Nachigera Mushagalusa, Aboubacry Kane, Arbuscular mycorrhizal dependency and responsiveness of maize varieties from South-Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, 2024, 0133-3720, 10.1007/s42976-024-00508-4 | |
8. | Isabela Figueiredo de Oliveira, Mariana Lourenço Campolino, Raquel Gomes de Oliveira, Ubiraci Gomes de Paula Lana, Eliane Aparecida Gomes, Sylvia Morais de Sousa, 2024, Chapter 2, 978-981-97-0299-2, 55, 10.1007/978-981-97-0300-5_2 |