Discussions of the use of the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) took off when a Turkish scientist claimed in the media that “the OGTT is poisoning babies” in 2014. The aim of present study investigates the effects of controversies in the media and on the Internet on the attitudes and behaviors of women in regards to the OGTT. The research was designed as a descriptive, cross-sectional study. The universe of the study was women aged 18–45 years in Turkey. Included in the study were 358 women of childbearing age who attended family health center outpatient clinics in January 2019. A questionnaire was administered during face-to-face interviews to those who provided consent for participation in the study. The data was analyzed using SPSS 22.0 software. Chi-square test was used to compare the between-group qualitative data. The results were evaluated based on an alpha value of 0.05. Results: Of the participating women, 18.99% (n = 88) were unaware of the OGTT. Of participant, 41.89 (n = 151) delivered “Iwill take OGTT in the future”. 27.09% (n = 97) delivered “I will not” and 11.73% (n = 42) were hesitant. Of the participants, 67.32% (n = 241) reported having been pregnant in the past. Of the participant, 62.24% (n = 150) delivered that they had OGTT in the past. The reasons given for not undergoing the OGTT in past pregnancies were 29.45% (n = 38) unaware during pregnancy, 28.68% (n = 37) delivered “my family physician did not recommend it”. But the ones who delivered that in the future will not take OGTT, their reasons were 56.66% (n = 34) delivered “heard from media and internet sources” that the test was harmful. The results of the study indicate that public trust of OGTT and taking OGTT rates are declining in Turkey. While women can obtain beneficial information from media and Internet sources, misinformation can easily shake their confidence in any scientific data.
Citation: Gökmen Özceylan, Dilek Toprak. Effects of controversial statements on social media regarding the oral glucose tolerance testing on pregnant women in Turkey[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2020, 7(1): 20-28. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020003
[1] | Caterina Marangio, Rosa Molfetta, Erisa Putro, Alessia Carnevale, Rossella Paolini . Exploring the dynamic of NKG2D/NKG2DL axis: A central regulator of NK cell functions. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2025, 9(2): 70-88. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2025005 |
[2] | Rosa Molfetta, Beatrice Zitti, Angela Santoni, Rossella Paolini . Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modifiers modulate NK cell-mediated recognition and killing of damaged cells. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2017, 1(4): 164-180. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2017.4.164 |
[3] | Arosh S. Perera Molligoda Arachchige . A universal CAR-NK cell approach for HIV eradication. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2021, 5(3): 192-194. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2021015 |
[4] | Masahiro Seike . Histamine suppresses T helper 17 responses mediated by transforming growth factor-β1 in murine chronic allergic contact dermatitis. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2018, 2(4): 180-189. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2018.4.180 |
[5] | Ling Wang, Shunbin Ning . “Toll-free” pathways for production of type I interferons. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2017, 1(3): 143-163. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2017.3.143 |
[6] | Omer Qibi, Severine Audusseau, Andrea Mogas, Zoulfia Allakhverdi, Abdelilah Soussi Gounni, Saba Al Heialy, Qutayba Hamid . No evidence for IgE receptor FcεRI expression on bronchial epithelial cells of asthmatic patients. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2018, 2(4): 165-179. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2018.4.165 |
[7] | Johan Garssen, Juandy Jo . Genetically-engineered T cells to treat viral hepatitis-associated liver cancer: is it possible?. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2017, 1(1): 43-49. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2017.1.43 |
[8] | Andrey Mamontov, Alexander Polevshchikov, Yulia Desheva . Mast cells in severe respiratory virus infections: insights for treatment and vaccine administration. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2023, 7(1): 1-23. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2023001 |
[9] | Mansur Aliyu, Fatema Zohora, Ali Akbar Saboor-Yaraghi . Spleen in innate and adaptive immunity regulation. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2021, 5(1): 1-17. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2021001 |
[10] | Xi Luo, Hehong Li, Rongshan Chen, Yinhui Zeng, Wenlong Liu, Qingxiang Zeng . MicroRNA-155 is a critical regulator of regulatory T cells in OM-85 Broncho-Vaxom treated experimental models of allergic rhinitis. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2024, 8(1): 8-17. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2024002 |
Discussions of the use of the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) took off when a Turkish scientist claimed in the media that “the OGTT is poisoning babies” in 2014. The aim of present study investigates the effects of controversies in the media and on the Internet on the attitudes and behaviors of women in regards to the OGTT. The research was designed as a descriptive, cross-sectional study. The universe of the study was women aged 18–45 years in Turkey. Included in the study were 358 women of childbearing age who attended family health center outpatient clinics in January 2019. A questionnaire was administered during face-to-face interviews to those who provided consent for participation in the study. The data was analyzed using SPSS 22.0 software. Chi-square test was used to compare the between-group qualitative data. The results were evaluated based on an alpha value of 0.05. Results: Of the participating women, 18.99% (n = 88) were unaware of the OGTT. Of participant, 41.89 (n = 151) delivered “Iwill take OGTT in the future”. 27.09% (n = 97) delivered “I will not” and 11.73% (n = 42) were hesitant. Of the participants, 67.32% (n = 241) reported having been pregnant in the past. Of the participant, 62.24% (n = 150) delivered that they had OGTT in the past. The reasons given for not undergoing the OGTT in past pregnancies were 29.45% (n = 38) unaware during pregnancy, 28.68% (n = 37) delivered “my family physician did not recommend it”. But the ones who delivered that in the future will not take OGTT, their reasons were 56.66% (n = 34) delivered “heard from media and internet sources” that the test was harmful. The results of the study indicate that public trust of OGTT and taking OGTT rates are declining in Turkey. While women can obtain beneficial information from media and Internet sources, misinformation can easily shake their confidence in any scientific data.
Natural Killer (NK) cells are innate lymphoid cells endowed with several effector and regulatory functions, including cytotoxic activity against virus infected and tumor-transformed cells. Although there is a growing knowledge of the phenotypic heterogeneity of the NK cell population [1], two major subsets of circulating NK cells have been described, CD56bright CD16low/neg and CD56dim CD16pos cells, which have different function and tissue distribution. CD56bright NK cells, which release large amount of soluble factors in response to pro-inflammatory cytokines, are poorly represented in peripheral blood, while largely populating secondary lymphoid organs. Conversely, CD56dim cells, which are highly cytotoxic effectors, represent the largest percentage of circulating NK cells.
The NK cell functions are finely regulated by a variety of germline-encoded inhibitory and activating receptors and by different cytokines, produced in the early or in the late phase of immune responses. All these cytokines other than potentiate NK cell responsiveness towards transformed cellular targets, stimulate the production of chemokines and cytokines (IFN-γ, TNF-α) crucial for shaping both innate and adaptive immunity [1,2].
The main inhibitory NK receptors include: Killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs), CD94/NKG2A and LILRB1, MHC class I-specific receptors that physiologically maintain self-tolerance; PD-1, TIM-3 and LAG-3 that belong to the immune checkpoint family, inhibitory pathways that are induced/up-regulated during immune responses and limit the duration and amplitude of the immune responses, thus minimizing tissue damage. Activating signals are mediated by a plethora of activating receptors and co-receptor including NKp46, NKp30 and NKp44 (collectively termed Natural Cytotoxicity Receptors, NCR), NKG2D and DNAM-1. The activating receptors recognize non-MHC ligands up-regulated or de novo expressed by cells upon cellular stress, tumor transformation or viral infection. The modality of NK cell activation, well depicted by the rheostat model [3,4], depends on the cytokine milieu as well as on the presence/absence and surface densities of the different ligands on neighboring healthy or altered cells.
Different mechanisms regulate the expression of receptors, on effector NK cells, or ligands on potential targets. Among these, microRNA-mediated mechanisms that regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. MicroRNA (miRNAs) are small RNAs, processed from stem-loop regions of longer RNA transcripts, which can interact with the 3′-Untranslated Region (3′-UTR) of target mRNAs via sequence complementarity, thus down-regulating gene expression through translation repression and/or mRNA degradation [5]. The importance of this kind of regulation is underlined by the fact that tumors and viruses evolved mechanisms to negatively affect NK activity acting through these pathways.
This review synthetically describes the current knowledge of miRNAs targeting molecules fundamental for the NK cell effector functions and trafficking.
Several miRNAs have been described that target different NK receptor pathways. These include activating receptors (NKG2D), the DAP12 signaling molecule, inhibitory receptors (KLRG1), immune checkpoint receptors (TIM-3, PD-1 and CTLA-4), chemokine and cytokine receptors (CX3CR1, IL-2Rγ). Interestingly, TGF-β1, an immune-modulatory cytokine highly produced and activated in the tumor microenvironment [6], has been shown to hamper NK cells activity down-regulating different receptors via distinct miRNA pathways (Figure 1).
NKG2D (CD314) is a C-type lectin-like receptor expressed on NK and CD8+ T cells. It is an activating receptor able to detect and promote the elimination of damaged, transformed, and pathogen-infected cells by recognizing stress-inducible ligands belonging to the MIC (MICA and MICB) and ULBP (ULBP1-6) families in humans [7]. In vitro studies showed that the surface expression of NKp30 and NKG2D is significantly down-regulated by conditioning NK cells with TGF-β1 or TGF-β2 [8,9]. Moreover, subsequent studies highlighted the presence in vivo of NKG2Dlow NK cells in cancer patients, ascribable to TGF-βactivity. One mechanism responsible for the TGF-β-mediated NKG2D down-regulation has been associated to the impairment of transcriptional and translational level of DAP10, the signaling subunit associated with human NKG2D [10]. Another mechanism has been showed by Espinoza et al. [11] who reported that TGF-β1 causes an increase of miR-1245 in NK cells. Overexpression of miR-1245 induced a down-regulation of NKG2D at the cell surface level, but had no effect on other activating receptors such as NKp30, NKp44 and NKp46. Moreover, NK cells overexpressing miR-1245 had lower cytotoxicity against target cells expressing NKG2D ligands. MiR-1245 was shown to directly target and down-regulate the NKG2D mRNA.
DAP12 (DNAX activating protein of 12 kDa) (also termed killer cell activating receptor-associated protein, KARAP) is a transmembrane protein containing an immune tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) in its cytoplasmic domain [12]. DAP12 is a fundamental signaling molecule that mediates a broad array of biological functions by associating with different activating receptors expressed in cells of lymphoid and myeloid lineage [12]. These receptors include the activating isoform of KIRs, CD94/NKG2C, and NKp44, the latter being expressed by NK cells upon activation. Donatelli et al. [13] reported that TGF-β1 down-regulates the DAP12 level in NK cells. MiR-183, which was up-regulated by TGF-β1, was shown to directly target DAP12 mRNA. NK cells overexpressing miR-183 had reduced DAP12 (both mRNA and protein) as well as decreased NKp44 surface levels. NK92 cells transduced with miR-183 were less efficient in killing Raji cells (which do not express NKG2D ligands) with respect to control lentiviral transduced cells. Interestingly, NK cells infiltrating lung cancers were shown to have a diminished DAP12 expression.
KLRG1 is a C-type lectin-like inhibitory receptor, containing an immune tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM), which binds to members of the cadherin family leading to inhibition of NK and T cell function. It is predominantly expressed by NK cells with a mature phenotype [14] and it is strongly induced by viral and other infections [15]. Cipolla et al. [16] reported that miR-584-5p targets KLRG1 and that overexpression of miR-584-5p in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) causes a decrease of KLRG1 mRNA expression. Interestingly, a 3′-UTR KLRG1 polymorphism, rs1805672, associated to the autoimmune disease Pemphigus foliaceus, abolishes the binding of the miRNA, thus causing the loss of the miRNA-mediated control of KLRG1 expression. Authors suggested a link between the loss of the miRNA-target interaction and predisposition to the autoimmune disease.
TIM-3 belongs to the T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain (TIM) family. It is expressed on the surface of several immune cells, including NK cells. Upon activation by the C-type lectin galectin-9 ligand, TIM-3 functions as an inhibitory receptor on NK cells by reducing their cytotoxicity and cytokine production [17]. Cheng et al. [18] reported that TIM-3 and T-bet expression in NK cells from chronically HCV-infected patients is up-regulated compared to NK from healthy controls, while miR-155 is down-regulated. The opposite regulation of TIM-3/T-bet and miR-155 was recapitulated in vitro by incubating primary NK cells or the NK92 cell line with Huh-7 hepatocytes expressing HCV. MiR-155 transfected in NK92 cells reduced TIM-3 and T-bet and enhanced IFN-γ expression. Authors suggest that TIM-3 expression is indirectly regulated by miR-155.
PD-1 is an immune checkpoint receptor evolutionary related to the CD28 family. It recognizes two cellular ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, and can be expressed on several cell types including T, B, NK, NKT and myeloid cells. Regarding NK cells, its expression seems to be confined to terminally differentiated NKG2Aneg KIRpos CD57pos NK cells, whose antitumor activity can be partially restored in vitro by antibodies disrupting the PD-1/PD-Ls interactions [19]. Timing in the expression of PD-1 is in line with the PD-1-dependent regulatory activity, which occurs in the later phases of the immune response [20]. To date, no miRNAs modulating PD-1 have been described in NK cells. Nevertheless, miR-4717, regulating only PD-1 variants containing a specific polymorphism in the 3′-UTR, has been described in total lymphocytes [21]. Moreover, miR-138 has been reported to modulate CTLA-4 and PD-1 expression in mouse and human CD4+ T cells [22], and miR-28 has been described to regulate PD-1 in mouse CD4+ T cells [23].
CTLA-4 (CD152) is an immune checkpoint receptor binding the CD80 and CD86 ligands with higher affinity than CD28. It is expressed in Treg and activated T cells, while its expression in NK cells has been detected in mouse, but not in human [24]. CTLA-4 is targeted by miR-155, and in stimulated naive TH cells transfection with the miR-155 precursor down-regulates CTLA-4 expression [25]. Moreover, as for PD-1, CTLA-4 is regulated by miR-138 in mouse and human CD4+ T cells [22].
CX3CR1 is a chemokine receptor expressed by different immune cell types, including monocytes, dendritic cells (DCs), T, and NK lymphocytes, which binds CX3CL1 (also known as fractalkine). CX3CR1, with other chemokine receptors, drives, at steady state, NK cell localization in peripheral tissues, and promotes their migration under inflammatory conditions [26]. Moreover, it has been shown that CX3CR1, CXCR4 and S1P5 regulate NK cells homing and migration from the bone marrow (BM) [27,28]. It has been demonstrated that the surface expression of CX3CR1 was down-regulated in NK cells co-cultured with SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma (NB) cells under trans-well conditions. Notably, CX3CR1 expression was reduced in NK cells from NB patients compared with healthy controls [9]. TGF-β1 released by NB cells has been shown to be responsible for the observed CX3CR1 down-regulation, as also confirmed in vitro using recombinant TGF-β1. Looking for the mechanisms involved, TGF-β1 was found to determine a significant increase of miR-27a-5p, which targeted the CX3CR1 mRNA in NK cells [29]. Up-regulation of miR-27a-5p was due to the TGF-β1-dependent up-regulation of miR-23a-27a-24-2 cluster, which encodes, among others, miR-27a-5p. As expected, inhibition of miR-27a-5p expression in NK cells caused an up-regulation of the CX3CR1 mRNA. Conversely, a reduction of CX3CR1 surface expression was observed in CX3CR1-expressing HEK293T cells following their treatment with miR-27a-5p mimic. In agreement with the original findings [9], NK cells cultured in the presence of SH-SY5Y NB cells exhibited a significant up-regulation of miR-27a-5p and down-regulation of CX3CR1 mRNA [29].
IL-2Rγ is a transmembrane protein belonging to the cytokine receptor gene superfamily. It is the γ component of multiple cytokine receptors, including those for IL-2, -4, -7, -9, -15, and -21, which are expressed on the surface of lymphocytes and other hematopoietic cells. Lack of IL2Rγ due to mutations of the encoding gene is responsible for X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (X-SCID), a cellular and humoral immunodeficiency with a near-complete absence of NK and T cells and nonfunctional B cells [30]. Yun et al. [31] reported that miR-583 targets IL-2Rγ. Differentiating NK cells transfected with miR-583 mimics showed a decreased surface expression of IL-2Rγ and defective differentiation. In particular, the miR-583 overexpressing NK cells showed decreased NKG2D, NKp30 and NKp46 expression and reduced capacity to kill target cells and to produce IFN-γ [31].
A number of miRNAs have been identified as regulators of ligands of NK cell receptors. Targeted molecules include ligands for MHC class I-specific (HLA-G, HLA-C, HLA-E) and non-specific (MICA, MICB, ULBPs) receptors, as well as the immune checkpoint ligands PD-L1, B7-H3, CD80 and CD86. In cancer cells modification of miRNA expression may represent a common mechanism of escape from the NK-mediated immune surveillance (Figure 2).
NKG2D ligands MICA, MICB, and ULBPs can be regulated by several miRNAs, of cellular or viral origin [32] that are potentially able to protect cancer cells and virus infected cells from NK cell cytotoxicity [7,32,33]. Stern-Ginossar et al. [34] reported 7 miRNAs regulating MICA and MICB expression (miRNAs miR-17-5p, miR-20a-5p, miR-93-5p, miR106b-5p, miR-372, miR373-3p, miR-520d-3p). Overexpression of these miRNAs in vitro and in vivo resulted in down-regulation of MICA and MICB expression and in lower susceptibility to NKG2D-dependent killing by human NK cells. On the other hand, three different viral miRNAs (miR-UL112, miR-BART2.5p and miR-K12-7), all derived from herpesviridae, targeted MICB, while a miRNA from polyoma viruses JCV and BKV targeted ULBP3 [32,33]. Two miRNAs (miR-376a and miR-433) were shown to regulate MICB and to decrease NK-mediated cytotoxicity against colon carcinoma cells [35]. MiR-34a and miR-34c were reported to target ULBP2 and, when overexpressed in a melanoma cell line, down-regulated its expression at the protein level. Moreover, miR-34c transfected melanoma cells displayed reduced susceptibility to NK cells cytotoxicity [36]. Other miRNAs (miR-10b, miR-519-3p, miR-20a, miR-93, miR-106b, miR302c, miR-520c), which were found overexpressed in various tumors, have been shown to down-regulate MICA, MICB and ULBP2, and, consequently, to reduce the NK cell-mediated killing of target cells [37,38,39,40,41,42].
HLA-G is a non-classical HLA class Ib molecule, expressed mainly in the placental trophoblasts, where is thought to provide immune protection to the embryo from the decidual NK cells, the major lymphocyte population at the fetal-maternal interface. HLA-G is also expressed by tumors and virus-infected cells [43]. HLA-G is recognized by LILRB1 and KIR2DL4 inhibitory receptors on human NK cells [44] and its soluble form has been described to regulate the chemokine receptor repertoire [45]. Several miRNAs down-regulate HLA-G expression: miR-148a, miR-152 (belonging to the same miRNA family), miR-133a, miR-548q, miR-628-5p and miR-365 [44,46,47,48]. An inverse correlation was reported between miR-628-5p and HLA-G in primary renal cell carcinoma tumors and cell lines [49]. In the case of miR-148a, miR-152 and miR-548q, it has been experimentally shown that they induce in target cells HLA-G down-regulation and increased susceptibility to the cytolytic activity of LILRB1+ NK cells [44,47,49]. The long noncoding RNA HOTAIR has been shown to bind miR-148a in cervical cancer [50] and miR-152 in gastric cancer cells [51], thus up-regulating HLA-G. TGF-β1 has been reported to cause a down-regulation of miR-152 inducing an up-regulation of HLA-G in gastric cancer cell lines [52].
HLA-C are classical HLA class I molecules recognized by inhibitory KIRs. In particular, KIR2DL1 binds C2 allotypes characterized by a lysine in position 80, whereas KIR2DL2 and KIR2DL3 recognize C1 allotypes sharing an asparagine in position 80 [53]. Interestingly, miR-148a is able to bind not only HLA-G, but also HLA-C. Kulkarni et al. [54] reported that a polymophism in the HLA-C 3′-UTR regulates binding capability of miR-148a to its target site, resulting in relatively low HLA-C surface expression of alleles that bind this miRNA and high expression of HLA-C alleles that escape post-transcriptional regulation.
The non-classical HLA-E binds a restricted subset of peptides encoded by the leader sequence of other class I molecules. It is recognized by the inhibitory CD94/NKG2A and activating CD94/NKG2C heterodimeric receptors, both expressed by T cells and NK cells [55]. The human cytomegalovirus [HCMV] encodes UL40, a peptide stabilizing HLA-E and driving the proliferation of CD94/NKG2C+ NK cells [56]. Interestingly, Nachmani et al. [57] showed that the short form of the RNA-editing enzyme ADAR1 induced editing of miR-376a in HCMV+ cells. Edited miR-376a down-regulated HLA-E expression rendering HCMV infected cells susceptible to elimination by NK CD94/NKG2A+ NK cells.
PD-L1 and PD-L2 are the two ligands of the PD-1 inhibitory receptor, which is expressed by activated NK and T cells [58,59]. Under physiological conditions, the PD-1/PD-Ls interactions control the duration and amplitude of immune responses, preventing autoimmune reactions. In cancer cells the expression of PD-Ls plays a crucial role in immune evasion. Several miRNAs regulating PD-L1 have been described, suggesting a tight control of its expression. In cancer cells PD-L1 expression is accompanied by miRNAs down-regulation [60,61,62]. MiR-513 has been the first miRNA reported to regulate PD-L1 and its inhibition in cholangiocytes induced PD-L1 protein expression [63]. In acute myeloid leukemia samples an inverse correlation was reported between miR-34 and PD-L1 expression and miR-34 was found to regulate PD-L1 expression in leukemia cell lines [64]. An inverse correlation was also reported between miR-200 and PD-L1 expression in lung adenocarcinoma samples. MiR-200 suppressed PD-L1 expression in murine and human mesenchymal lung cancer cell lines, while its down-regulation increased PD-L1 expression causing CD8+ T cells immune suppression [65]. MiR-138-5p was also found to target PD-L1. An inverse correlation was reported between miR-138-5p and PD-L1 expression in human colorectal cancer (CRC) samples and miR-138-5p overexpression suppressed CRC cell tumorigenicity [66]. Other miRNAs have been described as regulators of PD-L1 in various cancer cells, miR-15a, miR-15b and miR-16 in malignant pleural mesothelioma cell lines [67], miR-17-5p in metastatic melanoma [68], miR-142-5p in a pancreatic cancer cell line [69], miR-140 in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines [70]. MiR-424(322) regulated PD-L1 and CD80 in ovarian cancer and high levels of this miRNA correlated with increased progression-free survival of patients [71]. Expression of miR-152 was low in gastric carcinoma compared to controls, and miR-152 mimics inhibited PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer cell lines with increased T cell proliferation and function [72]. MiR-324-5p and miR-338-5p targeted PD-L1 and dendritic cells expressing these miRNAs displayed reduced surface expression of PD-L1 [73].
B7-H3, a member of the B7 superfamily [74,75], is the orphan ligand of an inhibitory receptor expressed by human NK and CD8+ T cells [74,76]. B7-H3 is considered as a new member of the immune checkpoint family [77]. Indeed, it has been shown to inhibit cytotoxicity and protect neuroblastoma (NB) (and other tumor cells) from NK cell-mediated lysis [74,76]. B7-H3 also promotes tumor invasiveness [78]. In line with these pro-tumoral properties, high B7-H3 expression correlates with poor prognosis in several tumor histotypes [78,79]. B7-H3 expression is regulated by several miRNAs. Xu et al. [80] reported that miR-29a, b, c are down-regulated in several B7-H3 expressing tumor tissues compared to normal tissues. MiR-29a targets B7-H3 in neuroblastoma cell lines [80] and down-regulation of miR-29a in central nervous system NB metastasis is associated with up-regulation of different molecules, including B7-H3 [81]. MiR-29c expression was inversely correlated to B7-H3 expression in melanoma [82] and was reported to target B7-H3 in breast cancer, where miR-29c expression correlated with increased survival [83]. Another miRNA targeting B7-H3 is represented by miR-187. MiR-187 was down-regulated in clear cell renal cell carcinoma [ccRCC] compared to normal tissues. Overexpression of miR-187 (as well as silencing of B7-H3) decreased cell migration in ccRCC cell lines [84]. Interestingly, in CRC cell lines, miR-143 was down-regulated by TGF-β1, thus causing the up-regulation of both its targets B7-H3 and B7-H4 and leading to tumor immune evasion [85]. MiR-124 targeted B7-H3 in osteosarcoma [OS] cells and inhibited their growth and invasive ability. Moreover, miR-124 was down-regulated in OS clinical specimens, with an inverse correlation between miR-124 and B7-H3 protein expression [86].
The expression of CD80 and CD86, CTLA-4 ligands, can be modulated by miRNAs. Besides miR-424(322) that regulates both PD-L1 and CD80 (see above) [71], miR-134 has been shown to bind CD86 mRNA suppressing its expression. Transfection of miR-134 in a melanoma cell line caused reduction of CD86 at the mRNA and protein level [87].
What clearly emerges from the recent literature on the regulation of NK receptors and ligands expression is a central role of miRNAs in the maintenance of a delicate equilibrium that can be heavily perturbed by tumor transformation or viral infection.
To escape NK cell immunosurveillance, tumor and virus infected cells evolved mechanisms to deregulate the expression of genes coding for molecules important for effector/target interactions [88]. These mechanisms often use the miRNA machinery. Pathological cells can affect NK-mediated recognition by up- or down-regulating miRNA targeting activating or inhibitory receptor ligands, respectively. Tumor cells can also act on NK cells by producing immunomodulatory factors, such as TGF-β1 that, influencing the expression of different receptors via distinct miRNA-pathways, realizes a combined inhibitory action. Other mechanisms can add levels of complexity to the action of the miRNA machinery, as the long noncoding RNAs sequestering miRNAs or the polymorphisms in the 3′-UTR of miRNA target genes.
The link between miRNA derangement and unpaired NK immunosurveillance makes miRNAs potential therapeutic targets [89]. MiRNA mimics or antimiRs can be used to increase or decrease the activity of miRNAs with tumor suppressive or oncogenic function. However, susceptibility to degradation in biological fluids and poor delivery to target sites might severely hamper the use of miRNAs in therapy. Chemical modifications of the miRNA backbone and the use of specific vehicles, as nanoparticles or minicells, have been developed to confer stability to the miRNAs. Moreover, specific molecules, such as antibodies, can be conjugated to the miRNAs or to the vehicles to ensure an efficient and specific delivery. Avoiding toxicities and off-target effects are additional challenges for a miRNA-based therapeutic approach.
In spite of these difficulties, two different phase I clinical trials treating cancer patients have been performed using miRNAs as therapeutic agents. The former study (NCT01829971) used miR-34 mimics encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles, without the association with specific targeting molecules, to treat patients affected by several solid tumors and hematological malignancies. Unfortunately, it was terminated due to immune related serious adverse events. In the latter study (NCT02369198), miR-16 mimics encapsulated in minicells targeted to EGFR-positive cancer cells by an anti-EGFR antibody have been used to treat patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma and non-small cell lung cancer. The study was regularly completed, establishing a dose of miRNA mimic which was well tolerated and accompanied by early signs of antitumor activity [90].
Therefore, combination of targeted miRNA-based therapies with other therapeutic interventions represents a possible strategy to reduce tumor aggressiveness and to potentiate NK cell-mediated responses against cancer.
The work from our laboratory described in this review has been supported by grants from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) and Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca (MIUR).
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in this paper.
[1] | (2018) Turkey Association of Endocrine and Metabolism, diabetes mellitus and its complications diagnosis, treatment and monitoring guide.171. |
[2] | Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Bruns DE (2006) Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics St Louis: Saunders, Elsevier, 498-499. |
[3] |
Weinert LS (2010) International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy: comment to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel. Diabetes Care 33: e97-e97. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0544
![]() |
[4] | https://www.haberturk.com/saglik/haber/1012921-anne-karnindaki-bebegi-zehirliyorsunuz. |
[5] | https://www.medimagazin.com.tr/hekim/genel/tr-tjod-baskanindan-karataya-hanimefendinin-herhangi-bir-calismasi-yok-2-12-67455.html. |
[6] | https://doktorlarsitesi.net/2015/04/10/saglik-bakanligi-gebelere-seker-yukleme-testi-ile-ilgili-tartismalara-noktayi-koydu/. |
[7] |
Griffin ME, Coffey M, Johnson H, et al. (2000) Universal vs. risk factor-based screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: detection rates, gestation at diagnosis and outcome. Diabetic Med 17: 26-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2000.00214.x
![]() |
[8] | Nakanishi S, Yoneda M, Maeda S (2013) Impact of glucose excursion and mean glucose concentration in oral glucose-tolerance test on oxidative stress among Japanese Americans. Diabetes, Metab Syndr Obes: Targets Ther 6: 427-433. |
[9] |
Radovanovic PB, Kocijancic M (2015) How well are pregnant women in Croatia informed about the oral glucose tolerance test? Biochem Med 25: 230-236. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.023
![]() |
[10] |
Eades CE, Cameron DM, Evans JMM (2017) Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Europe: A meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 129: 173-181. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.030
![]() |
[11] |
Gillani AH, Amirul İslam FM, Hayat K, et al. (2018) Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding diabetes in the general population: A cross-sectional study from Pakistan. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15: 1906. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091906
![]() |
[12] | Thani A, Farghaly AH, Akram H, et al. (2018) Public awareness and perceptions about diabetes in the State of Qatar. Cureus 10: e2671. |
[13] |
Man B, Turyk ME, Kominiarek MA, et al. (2016) Diabetes screening in US women with a history of gestational diabetes, national health and nutrition examination survey, 2007–2012. Prev Chronic Dis 13: 160106. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.160106
![]() |
[14] |
Smirnakis KV, Chasan-Taber L, Wolf M, et al. (2005) Postpartum diabetes screening in women with a history of gestational diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 106: 1297-1303. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000189081.46925.90
![]() |
[15] | Karasu Y (2018) What happened to the glucose loading test? The impact of media on public health. Med J Ankara Tr Res Hosp 51: 57-58. |
[16] |
Rueangdetnarong H, Sekararithi R, Jaiwongkam T, et al. (2018) Comparisons of the oxidative stress biomarkers levels in GDM and non-GDM among Thai population: cohort study. Endocr Connect 7: 681-687. doi: 10.1530/EC-18-0093
![]() |
[17] |
Kassahun CH, Mekonen AG (2017) Knowledge, attitude, practices and their associated factors towards diabetes mellitus among non diabetes community members of Bale Zone administrative towns, South East Ethiopia. A cross-sectional study. Plos One 12: e0170040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170040
![]() |
[18] |
Karamanos B, Thanopoulou A, Anastasiou E, et al. (2014) Relation of the Mediterranean diet with the incidence of gestational diabetes. Eur J Clin Nutr 68: 8-13. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2013.177
![]() |
1. | Stefano Regis, Alessandra Dondero, Fabio Caliendo, Cristina Bottino, Roberta Castriconi, NK Cell Function Regulation by TGF-β-Induced Epigenetic Mechanisms, 2020, 11, 1664-3224, 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00311 | |
2. | Behnaz Valipour, Kobra Velaei, Ali Abedelahi, Mohammad Karimipour, Masoud Darabi, Hojjatollah Nozad Charoudeh, NK cells: An attractive candidate for cancer therapy, 2019, 234, 0021-9541, 19352, 10.1002/jcp.28657 | |
3. | Alireza Mardomi, Nabiallah Mohammadi, Hamid Tayebi Khosroshahi, Saeid Abediankenari, An update on potentials and promises of T cell co‐signaling molecules in transplantation, 2020, 235, 0021-9541, 4183, 10.1002/jcp.29369 | |
4. | Stefano Regis, Alessandra Dondero, Grazia Maria Spaggiari, Martina Serra, Fabio Caliendo, Cristina Bottino, Roberta Castriconi, miR-24-3p down-regulates the expression of the apoptotic factors FasL and BIM in human natural killer cells, 2022, 98, 08986568, 110415, 10.1016/j.cellsig.2022.110415 | |
5. | E Hui Clarissa Lee, Darren Chen Pei Wong, Jeak Ling Ding, NK Cells in a Tug-of-War With Cancer: The Roles of Transcription Factors and Cytoskeleton, 2021, 12, 1664-3224, 10.3389/fimmu.2021.734551 | |
6. | Yun Yan Foo, Angelina Tiah, Shuh Wen Aung, Harnessing the power of memory-like NK cells to fight cancer, 2023, 212, 0009-9104, 212, 10.1093/cei/uxad030 | |
7. | Somlata Khamaru, Kshyama Subhadarsini Tung, Subhasis Chattopadhyay, 2025, Chapter 1, 978-3-031-88694-2, 1, 10.1007/978-3-031-88695-9_1 |