Human evolution is carried out by two genetic systems based on DNA and another based on the transmission of information through the functions of the nervous system. In computational neuroscience, mathematical neural models are used to describe the biological function of the brain. Discrete-time neural models have received particular attention due to their simple analysis and low computational costs. From the concept of neuroscience, discrete fractional order neuron models incorporate the memory in a dynamic model. This paper introduces the fractional order discrete Rulkov neuron map. The presented model is analyzed dynamically and also in terms of synchronization ability. First, the Rulkov neuron map is examined in terms of phase plane, bifurcation diagram, and Lyapunov exponent. The biological behaviors of the Rulkov neuron map, such as silence, bursting, and chaotic firing, also exist in its discrete fractional-order version. The bifurcation diagrams of the proposed model are investigated under the effect of the neuron model's parameters and the fractional order. The stability regions of the system are theoretically and numerically obtained, and it is shown that increasing the order of the fractional order decreases the stable areas. Finally, the synchronization behavior of two fractional-order models is investigated. The results represent that the fractional-order systems cannot reach complete synchronization.
Citation: Gayathri Vivekanandhan, Hamid Reza Abdolmohammadi, Hayder Natiq, Karthikeyan Rajagopal, Sajad Jafari, Hamidreza Namazi. Dynamic analysis of the discrete fractional-order Rulkov neuron map[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(3): 4760-4781. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023220
[1] | Marta Monzón . Approaches to therapy against prion diseases focused on the individual defence system. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(3): 241-251. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.3.241 |
[2] | Jehad Shaikhali, Gunnar Wingsle . Redox-regulated transcription in plants: Emerging concepts. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(3): 301-338. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.3.301 |
[3] | Amena W. Smith, Swapan K. Ray, Arabinda Das, Kenkichi Nozaki, Baerbel Rohrer, Naren L. Banik . Calpain inhibition as a possible new therapeutic target in multiple sclerosis. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(4): 446-462. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.4.446 |
[4] | Seidu A. Richard, Wu Min, Zhaoliang Su, Hua-Xi Xu . Epochal neuroinflammatory role of high mobility group box 1 in central nervous system diseases. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(2): 185-218. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.2.185 |
[5] | Naba Hasan, Waleem Ahmad, Feroz Alam, Mahboob Hasan . Ferroptosis-molecular mechanisms and newer insights into some diseases. AIMS Molecular Science, 2023, 10(1): 22-36. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2023003 |
[6] | Giulia Ambrosi, Pamela Milani . Endoplasmic reticulum, oxidative stress and their complex crosstalk in neurodegeneration: proteostasis, signaling pathways and molecular chaperones. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(4): 424-444. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.4.424 |
[7] | Mireille Khacho, Ruth S. Slack . Mitochondrial dynamics in neurodegeneration: from cell death to energetic states. AIMS Molecular Science, 2015, 2(2): 161-174. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2015.2.161 |
[8] | Jian Zou, Fulton T. Crews . Glutamate/NMDA excitotoxicity and HMGB1/TLR4 neuroimmune toxicity converge as components of neurodegeneration. AIMS Molecular Science, 2015, 2(2): 77-100. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2015.2.77 |
[9] | Andrea Bernardini, Gaia Pellitteri, Giovanni Ermanis, Gian Luigi Gigli, Mariarosaria Valente, Francesco Janes . Critically appraised topic on Rapid Eye Movement Behavior Disorder: From protein misfolding processes to clinical pathophysiology and conversion to neurodegenerative disorders. AIMS Molecular Science, 2023, 10(2): 127-152. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2023010 |
[10] | Michela Illiano, Luigi Sapio, Ilaria Caiafa, Emilio Chiosi, Annamaria Spina, Silvio Naviglio . Forskolin sensitizes pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine via Stat3 and Erk1/2 inhibition. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(2): 224-240. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.2.224 |
Human evolution is carried out by two genetic systems based on DNA and another based on the transmission of information through the functions of the nervous system. In computational neuroscience, mathematical neural models are used to describe the biological function of the brain. Discrete-time neural models have received particular attention due to their simple analysis and low computational costs. From the concept of neuroscience, discrete fractional order neuron models incorporate the memory in a dynamic model. This paper introduces the fractional order discrete Rulkov neuron map. The presented model is analyzed dynamically and also in terms of synchronization ability. First, the Rulkov neuron map is examined in terms of phase plane, bifurcation diagram, and Lyapunov exponent. The biological behaviors of the Rulkov neuron map, such as silence, bursting, and chaotic firing, also exist in its discrete fractional-order version. The bifurcation diagrams of the proposed model are investigated under the effect of the neuron model's parameters and the fractional order. The stability regions of the system are theoretically and numerically obtained, and it is shown that increasing the order of the fractional order decreases the stable areas. Finally, the synchronization behavior of two fractional-order models is investigated. The results represent that the fractional-order systems cannot reach complete synchronization.
Transglutaminases (TGs, E.C. 2.3.2.13) are Ca2+-dependent enzymes which catalyze post-translational modifications of proteins. Examples of TG-catalyzed reactions include: (Ⅰ) acyl transfer between the γ-carboxamide group of a protein/polypeptide glutaminyl residue and the e-amino group of a protein/polypeptide lysyl residue; (Ⅱ) attachment of a polyamine to the γ-carboxamide of a glutaminyl residue; (Ⅲ) deamidation of the γ-carboxamide group of a protein/polypeptide glutaminyl residue (Figure 1) [1,2]. The reactions catalyzed by TGs occur by a two-step mechanism (ping-pong type) (Figure 2). The transamidating activity of TGs is activated by the binding of Ca2+, which exposes an active-site cysteine residue. This cysteine residue reacts with the γ-carboxamide group of an incoming glutaminyl residue of a protein/peptide substrate to yield a thioacyl-enzyme intermediate and ammonia (Figure 2, Step 1). The thioacyl-enzyme intermediate then reacts with a nucleophilic primary amine substrate, resulting in the covalent attachment of the amine-containing donor to the substrate glutaminyl acceptor and regeneration of the cysteinyl residue at the active site (Figure 2, Step 2). If the primary amine is donated by the ε-amino group of a lysyl residue in a protein/polypeptide, a Nε-(γ-L-glutamyl)-L-lysine (GGEL) isopeptide bond is formed (Figure 1, example Ⅰ). On the other hand, if a polyamine or another primary amine (e.g. histamine, serotonin and others) acts as the amine donor, a γ-glutamylpolyamine (or γ-glutamylamine) residue is formed (Figure 1, example Ⅱ). It is also possible for a polyamine to act as an N, N-bis-(γ-L-glutamyl)polyamine bridge between two glutaminyl acceptor residues either on the same protein/polypeptide or between two proteins/polypeptides [3]. If there is no primary amine present, water may act as the attacking nucleophile, resulting in the deamidation of glutaminyl residues to glutamyl residues (Figure 1, example Ⅲ). Regarding the physiological roles played by the transglutaminase activity, recently transglutaminase-catalyzed polyamination of tubulin has been shown to stabilize axonal microtubules, suggesting an important role for these reactions also during some physiological processes, such as neurite outgrowth and axon maturation [4]. The reactions catalyzed by TGs occur with little change in free energy and hence should theoretically be reversible. However, under physiological conditions the cross-linking reactions catalyzed by TGs are usually irreversible. This irreversibility partly results from the metabolic removal of ammonia from the system and from thermodynamic considerations resulting from altered protein conformation. Some scientific reports suggest that TGs may be able to catalyze the hydrolysis of Nε-(γ-L-glutamyl)-L-lysine cross-links (GGEL) isopeptide bonds in some soluble cross-linked proteins. Furthermore, it is likely that TGs can catalyze the exchange of polyamines onto proteins [2]. In TG2 other catalytic activities, such as the ability to hydrolyze GTP (or ATP) into GDP (or ADP) and inorganic phosphate (Figure 1, example Ⅳ), a protein disulfide isomerase activity (Figure 1, example Ⅴ), and a kinase activity which phosphorylates histones, retinoblastoma (RB) and P53 (Figure 1, example Ⅵ), are present, while only some of these activities have been identified also in other TGs [5,6,7,8].
Numerous experimental data indicate that some TGs are multifunctional proteins with distinct and regulated enzymatic activities. In fact, under physiological conditions, the transamidation activity of TGs is latent [9,10], while other activities, recently identified, could be present. For example, in some physiological states, when the concentration of Ca2+ increases, the crosslinking activity of TGs may contribute to important biological processes. As previously described, one of the most intriguing properties of some TGs, such as TG2, is the ability to bind and hydrolyze GTP and furthermore, to bind to GTP and Ca2+. GTP and Ca2+ regulate its enzymatic activities, including protein cross-linking, in a reciprocal manner: the binding of Ca2+ inhibits GTP-binding and GTP-binding inhibits the transglutaminase cross-linking activity of the TG2 [5]. Interestingly, TG2 shows no sequence homology with heterotrimeric or low-molecular-weight G-proteins, but there is evidence that TG2 (TG2/Ghα) is involved in signal transduction, and, therefore, TG2/Ghα should also be classified as a large molecular weight G-protein. Other studies, along with ours, showed that TG2/Ghα can mediate the activation of phospholipase C (PLC) by the α1b -adrenergic receptor [10] and can modulate adenylyl cyclase activity [11]. TG2/Ghα can also mediate the activation of the δ1 isoform of PLC and of maxi-K channels [12]. Interestingly, the signaling function of TG2/Ghα is preserved even with the mutagenic inactivation of its crosslinking activity by the mutation of the active site cysteine residue [13].
At least eight different TGs, distributed in the human body, have been identified up to now (Table 1) [14,15,16,17,18,19]. Complex gene expression mechanisms regulate the physiological roles that these enzymes play in both the intracellular and extracellular compartments. In the Nervous System, for example, several forms of TGs are simultaneously expressed [20,21,22]. Moreover, in these last years, several alternative splice variants of TGs, mostly in the 3'-end regions, have been identified [23]. Interestingly, some of them are differently expressed in human pathologies, such as Alzheimer's Disease (AD) [24]. On the basis of their ubiquitous expression and their biological roles, we may speculate that the absence of these enzymes would be lethal. However, this does not always seem to be the case, since, for example, null mutants of the TG2 are usually phenotypically normal at birth [12,25,26]. This result may be explained by the expression of other TG genes that may substitute the TG2 missing isoform, although other TG isoform mutations have been associated with severe phenotypes, such as lamellar ichthyosis for TG1 isoform mutations. Bioinformatic studies have shown that the primary structures of human TGs share some identities in only few regions, such as the active site and the calcium binding regions. However, high sequence conservation and, therefore, a high degree of preservation of secondary structure among TG2, TG3 and FXⅢa indicate that these TGs all share four-domain tertiary structures which could be similar to those of other TGs [27].
TG | Physiological role | Gene map location | Reference |
Factor XⅢa | Blood clotting | 6p24-25 | [14] |
TG 1 (Keratinocyte TG, kTG) | Skin differentiation | 14q11.2 | [15] |
TG 2 (Tissue TG, tTG, cTG) | Apoptosis, cell adhesion, signal transduction | 20q11-12 | [16] |
TG 3(Epidermal TG, eTG) | Hair follicle differentiation | 20p11.2 | [17] |
TG 4 (Prostate TG, pTG) | Suppression of sperm immunogenicity | 3q21-2 | [18] |
TG 5 (TG X) | Epidermal differentiation | 15q15.2 | [19] |
TG 6 (TG Y) | Central Nervous System development | 20p13 | [19] |
TG 7 (TG Z) | Unknown function | 15q15.2 | [19] |
Numerous scientific data suggest that the transglutaminase activity is involved in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases, but to date, however, still controversial experimental findings about the role of the TGs enzymes in these diseases have been obtained [28,29,30]. Protein aggregates in affected brain regions are histopathological hallmarks of many neurodegenerative diseases [31]. More than 20 years ago Selkoe et al. suggested that TG activity might contribute to the formation of protein aggregates in AD brain [32]. In support of this hypothesis, tau protein has been shown to be an excellent in vitro substrate of TGs and GGEL cross-links have been found in the neurofibrillary tangles and paired helical filaments of AD brains [33,34,35]. Interestingly, a recent work showed the presence of bis γ-glutamyl putrescine in human CSF, which was increased in Huntington's Disease (HD) CSF [36]. This is an important evidence that protein/peptides crosslinking by polyamines does indeed occur in the brain, and that this is increased in HD brain. TG activity has been shown to induce also amyloid β-protein oligomerization [37] and aggregation at physiologic levels [38]. By these molecular mechanisms, TGs could contribute to AD symptoms and progression [38]. Moreover, there is evidence that TGs also contribute to the formation of proteinaceous deposits in Parkinson's Disease (PD) [39,40], in supranuclear palsy and in HD, a neurodegenerative disease caused by a CAG expansion in the affected gene [41,42,43]. For example, expanded polyglutamine domains have been reported to be substrates of TG2 and therefore aberrant TG activity could contribute to CAG-expansion diseases, including HD (Figure 3) [45,46]. However, although all these studies suggest the possible involvement of the TGs in the formation of deposits of protein aggregates in neurodegenerative diseases, they do not indicate whether aberrant TG activity per se directly determines the disease progression. For example, several experimental findings reported that TG2 activity in vitro leads to the formation of soluble aggregates of α-synuclein or polyQ proteins [47,48,49]. To date, as previously reported, at least ten human CAG-expansion diseases have been described (Table 2) and in at least eight of them their neuropathology is caused by the expansion in the number of residues in the polyglutamine domain to a value beyond 35–40 [50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59]. Remarkably, the mutated proteins have no obvious similarities except for the expanded polyglutamine domain. In fact, in all cases except SCA 12, the mutation occurs in the coding region of the gene. However, in SCA12, the CAG triplet expansion occurs in the untranslated region at the 5' end of the PPP2R2B gene. It has been proposed that the toxicity results from overexpression of the brain specific regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase PP2A [56]. Most of the mutated proteins are widely expressed both within the brain and elsewhere in the body. A major challenge then is to understand why the brain is primarily affected and why different regions within the brain are affected in the different CAG-expansion diseases, i.e., what accounts for the neurotoxic gain of function of each protein and for a selective vulnerability of each cell type. Possibly, the selective vulnerability [60] may be explained in part by the susceptibility of the expanded polyglutamine domains in the various CAG-expansion diseases to act as cosubstrates for a brain TG (Figure 4). To strengthen the possible central role of the TGs in neurodegenerative diseases, a study by Hadjivassiliou et al. showed that anti-TG2 IgA antibodies are present in the gut and brain of patients with gluten ataxia [61], a non-genetic sporadic cerebellar ataxia, but not in ataxia control patients. Recently, anti-TG2, -TG3 and -TG6 antibodies have been found in sera from CD patients, suggesting a possible involvement also of other TGs in the pathogenesis of dermatitis herpetiformis and gluten ataxia, two frequent extra intestinal manifestations of gluten sensitivity [62,63]. These last findings could suggest also a possible role of the "gut-brain axis" for the etiopathogenesis of human neurodegenerative diseases, in which the TG enzymes, in particular the TG2 enzyme, could play an important role [64,65,66].
Disease | Sites of neuropathology | CAG triplet number | Gene product (Intracellular localization of protein deposits) | Reference | |
Normal | Disease | ||||
Corea Major or Huntington's Disease (HD) | Striatum (medium spiny neurons) and cortex in late stage | 6–35 | 36–121 | Huntingtin(n, c) | [50] |
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1 (SCA1) | Cerebellar cortex (Purkinje cells), dentate nucleus and brain stem | 6–39 | 40–81 | Ataxin-1(n, c) | [51] |
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 (SCA2) | Cerebellum, pontine nuclei, substantia nigra | 15–29 | 35–64 | Ataxin-2 (c) | [52] |
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 (SCA3) or Machado-Joseph disease (MJD) | Substantia nigra, globus pallidus, pontine nucleus, cerebellar cortex | 13–42 | 61–84 | Ataxin -3 (c) | [53] |
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6 (SCA6) | Cerebellar and mild brainstem atrophy | 4–18 | 21–30 | Calcium channel Subunit (α 1A)(m) | [54] |
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7 (SCA7) | Photoreceptor and bipolar cells, cerebellar cortex, brainstem | 7–17 | 37–130 | Ataxin-7 (n) | [55] |
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 12 (SCA12) | Cortical, cerebellar atrophy | 7–32 | 41–78 | Brain specific regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase PP2A (?) | [56] |
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 17 (SCA17) | Gliosis and neuronal loss in the Purkinje cell layer | 29–42 | 46–63 | TATA-binding protein (TBP) (n) | [57] |
Spinobulbar Muscular Atrophy (SBMA) or Kennedy Disease | Motor neurons (anterior horn cells, bulbar neurons) and dorsal root ganglia | 11–34 | 40–62 | Androgen receptor (n, c) | [58] |
Dentatorubral-pallidoluysian Atrophy (DRPLA) | Globus pallidus, dentato-rubral and subthalamic nucleus | 7–35 | 49–88 | Atrophin (n, c) | [59] |
Cellular localization: c, cytosol; m, membrane; n, nucleus; ?, unknown localization. |
In support of the hypothesis of the toxic effect of TG activity in other neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's Disease, TG activity has been shown to induce amyloid beta-protein and α-synuclein oligomerization and aggregation at physiologic levels [67,68,69]. In fact, TG activity induces protofibril-like amyloid beta-protein assemblies that are protease-resistant and inhibit long-term potentiation [38]. Therefore, by these molecular mechanisms, TG activity could also contribute to Alzheimer's disease symptoms and progression. Very recently, TG2 and its product isopeptide have been found increased in Alzheimer's disease and APPswe/PS1dE9 double transgenic mice brains [70], while catalytically active TG2 colocalizes with Aβ pathology in Alzheimer's disease mouse models [71]. Interestingly, other works are suggesting that also other TGs could be involved in the molecular mechanisms responsible for neurodegenerative diseases [72]. In particular, a recent work by Basso et al. found that in addition to TG2, TG1 gene expression level is significantly induced following stroke in vivo or due to oxidative stress in vitro [73]. Moreover, structurally diverse inhibitors, used at concentrations that inhibit TG1 and TG2 simultaneously, are neuroprotective. Together, these last studies suggested that multiple TG isoforms, not only TG2, participate in oxidative stress-induced cell death signalling, and that isoform nonselective inhibitors of TG will be most efficacious in combating oxidative death in neurological disorders. These are interesting and worthwhile studies, suggesting that multiple TG isoforms can participate in neuronal death processes. Therefore, all these studies suggest that the involvement of brain TGs could represent a common denominator in several neurological diseases, which can lead to the determination of pathophysiological consequences through different molecular mechanisms (Table 3).
Associations/cause | Effects |
Gluten intolerance | Gluten ataxia |
Neuroinflammation | Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases |
Neuroinflammation plays an important role in various chronic neurodegenerative diseases, characterized also by the pathological accumulation of specific protein aggregates. In particular, several of these proteins have been shown to be substrates of transglutaminases. Interestingly, it has recently been demonstrated that transglutaminase 2 (TG2) may also be involved in molecular mechanisms underlying inflammation. In the central nervous system, astrocytes and microglia are the cell types mainly involved in this inflammatory process. The transcription factor NF-κB is considered the main regulator of inflammation and it is activated by a variety of stimuli including calcium influx, oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokines. Recently, in addition to these stimuli, TG2 has been shown to activate NF-κB both via a canonical pathway [74] and via a non-canonical pathway [75]. On the other hand, NF-κB regulatory response elements are present also in the Transglutaminase 2 promoter [76]. Under these conditions, the over-expression of TG2 results in the sustained activation of NF-κB. Severalκ findings emphasize the possible role of the TG2/NF-κB activation pathway in neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Together, these evidences suggest that TG2 could play a role in neuroinflammation and could contribute to the production of compounds that are potentially deleterious to neuronal cells [77].
In consideration to the fact that up to now there have been no long-term effective treatments for the human neurodegenerative diseases previously reported, then the possibility that selective TG inhibitors may be of clinical benefit has been seriously considered. In this respect, some encouraging results have been obtained with TG inhibitors in preliminary studies with different biological models of CAG-expansion diseases. For example, cystamine (Figure 5) is a potent in vitro inhibitor of enzymes that require an unmodified cysteine at the active site [78]. Inasmuch as TGs contain a crucial active-site cysteine, cystamine has the potential to inhibit these enzymes by a sulfide-disulfide interchange reaction. A sulfide-disulfide interchange reaction results in the formation of cysteamine and a cysteamine-cysteine mixed disulfide residue at the active site. Recent studies have shown that cystamine decreases the number of protein inclusions in transfected cells expressing the atrophin (DRPLA) protein containing a pathological-length polyglutamine domain [79]. In other studies, cystamine administration to HD-transgenic mice resulted in an increase in life expectancy and amelioration of neurological symptoms [80,81]. Neuronal inclusions were decreased in one of these studies [81]. Although all these scientific reports seem to support the hypothesis of a direct role of transglutaminase activity in the pathogenesis of the polyglutamine diseases, cystamine is also found to act in the HD-transgenic mice by mechanisms other than the inhibition of TGs, such as the inhibition of caspases [82], suggesting that this compound can have an additive effect in the therapy of HD. Currently, cysteamine is already in phase Ⅰ studies in humans with HD [83], but several side effects, such as nausea, motor impairment and dosing schedule have been reported as reasons for non-adherence during phase Ⅱ studies in human patients affected by cystinosis [84,85]. Another critical problem in the use of TG inhibitors in treating neurological diseases relates to the fact that, as previously reported, the human brain contains at least four TGs, including TG1, 2, 3 and TG6, and a strong non-selective inhibitor of TGs might also inhibit plasma Factor XⅢa, causing a bleeding disorder [22,86]. Therefore, from a number of standpoints it would
seem that a selective inhibitor, which discriminates between TGs, would be preferable to an indiscriminate TG inhibitor. In fact, although most of the TG activity in mouse brain, at least as assessed by an assay that measures the incorporation of radioactive putrescine (amine donor) into N, N-dimethyl casein (amine acceptor), seems to be due to TG2 [87], no conclusive data have been obtained by TG2 gene knock-out experiments about the involvement of this TG in the development of the symptoms in HD-transgenic mice [26,88,89]. Moreover, a recent scientific report showed that cystamine reduces aggregate formation in a mouse model of oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OMPD), in which also the TG2 knockdown is capable of suppressing the aggregation and the toxicity of the mutant protein PABPN1 [90], suggesting this compound as a possible therapeutic for OMPD.
Numerous scientific reports have implicated aberrant TG activity in neurodegenerative diseases, but still today we are looking for experimental findings which could definitely confirm the direct involvement of TGs in the pathogenetic mechanisms responsible for these diseases. However, as result of the putative role of specific TG isoforms, such as TG2, in some human diseases, there is a considerable interest in developing inhibitors of these enzymes [91,92]. Of those currently available, cystamine is the most commonly used experimentally to inhibit TG2 activity. In addition to cystamine, several types of TG2 inhibitors have been developed up to now [93]. Interestingly, some of these inhibitors have shown promising results in experimental diabetic models [94]. Therefore, the use of these inhibitors of TGs could be then useful also for other clinical approaches. To minimize the possible side effects, however, more selective inhibitors of the TGs should be required in the future. Progress in this area of research could be achieved, if possible, also through pharmaco-genetic approaches.
This work is supported by the Italian Education Department and the Regione Campania (L.R. n.5 del 28.03.2002, finanziamento 2008) entitled: Identificazione e caratterizzazione di geni della transglutaminasi nel Sistema Nervoso in relazione allo sviluppo di malattie neurodegenerative (Identification and characterization of transglutaminase genes in the Nervous System in relationship to the development of neurodegenerative diseases).
Authors do not have any conflict of interest.
[1] | F. Corinto, A. Torcini, Nonlinear dynamics in computational neuroscience, Springer, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71048-8 |
[2] | D. Sterratt, B. Graham, A. Gillies, D. Willshaw, Principles of computational modelling in neuroscience, Cambridge University Press, 2011. |
[3] |
J. F. Tagne, H. C. Edima, Z. T. Njitacke, F. F. Kemwoue, R. N. Mballa, J. Atangana, Bifurcations analysis and experimental study of the dynamics of a thermosensitive neuron conducted simultaneously by photocurrent and thermistance, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top, 231 (2022), 993–1004. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00311-w doi: 10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00311-w
![]() |
[4] | E. M. Izhikevich, Dynamical systems in neuroscience, MIT press, 2007. |
[5] |
D. Guo, S. Wu, M. Chen, M. Perc, Y. Zhang, J. Ma, et al., Regulation of irregular neuronal firing by autaptic transmission, Sci. Rep., 6 (2016), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26096 doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0001-8
![]() |
[6] |
J. Ma, J. Tang, A review for dynamics in neuron and neuronal network, Nonlinear Dyn., 89 (2017), 1569–1578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3565-3 doi: 10.1007/s11071-017-3565-3
![]() |
[7] |
A. Foroutannia, M. Ghasemi, F. Parastesh, S. Jafari, M. Perc, Complete dynamical analysis of a neocortical network model, Nonlinear Dyn., 100 (2020), 2699–2714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-020-05668-6 doi: 10.1007/s11071-020-05668-6
![]() |
[8] |
Q. Xu, X. Tan, D. Zhu, H. Bao, Y. Hu, B. Bao, Bifurcations to bursting and spiking in the Chay neuron and their validation in a digital circuit, Chaos Solit. Fract., 141 (2020), 110353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110353 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110353
![]() |
[9] |
A. L. Hodgkin, A. F. Huxley, A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve, J. Physiol., 117 (1952), 500. https://doi.org/10.1113%2Fjphysiol.1952.sp004764 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764
![]() |
[10] |
R. FitzHugh, Impulses and physiological states in theoretical models of nerve membrane, Biophys. J., 1 (1961), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(61)86902-6 doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(61)86902-6
![]() |
[11] |
Z. T. Njitacke, C. N. Takembo, J. Awrejcewicz, H. P. E. Fouda, J. Kengne, Hamilton energy, complex dynamical analysis and information patterns of a new memristive FitzHugh-Nagumo neural network, Chaos Solit. Fract., 160 (2022), 112211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112211 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112211
![]() |
[12] |
J. L. Hindmarsh, R. Rose, A model of neuronal bursting using three coupled first order differential equations, Proc. R Soc. London Ser. B, 221 (1984), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1984.0024 doi: 10.1098/rspb.1984.0024
![]() |
[13] |
Z. T. Njitacke, J. Awrejcewicz, A. N. K. Telem, T. F. Fozin, J. Kengne, Complex dynamics of coupled neurons through a memristive synapse: extreme multistability and its control with selection of the desired state, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Ⅱ Express Briefs, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2022.3172141 doi: 10.1109/TCSII.2022.3172141
![]() |
[14] |
Z. T. Njitacke, T. F. Fozin, S. S. Muni, J. Awrejcewicz, J. Kengne, Energy computation, infinitely coexisting patterns and their control from a Hindmarsh–Rose neuron with memristive autapse: Circuit implementation, AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun., 155 (2022), 154361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2022.154361 doi: 10.1016/j.aeue.2022.154361
![]() |
[15] |
Z. N. Tabekoueng, S. S. Muni, T. F. Fozin, G. D. Leutcho, J. Awrejcewicz, Coexistence of infinitely many patterns and their control in heterogeneous coupled neurons through a multistable memristive synapse, Chaos, 32 (2022), 053114. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0086182 doi: 10.1063/5.0086182
![]() |
[16] |
B. Ibarz, J. M. Casado, M. A. Sanjuán, Map-based models in neuronal dynamics, Phys. Rep., 501 (2011), 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2010.12.003 doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2010.12.003
![]() |
[17] |
M. Gosak, M. Milojević, M. Duh, K. Skok, M. Perc, Networks behind the morphology and structural design of living systems, Phys. Life Rev. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2022.03.001 doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2022.03.001
![]() |
[18] |
S. Majhi, M. Perc, D. Ghosh, Dynamics on higher-order networks: A review, J. R Soc. Interf., 19 (2022), 20220043. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2022.0043 doi: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0043
![]() |
[19] |
M. Perc, Spatial coherence resonance in neuronal media with discrete local dynamics, Chaos Solit. Fract., 31 (2007), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2005.09.021 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2005.09.021
![]() |
[20] |
E. M. Izhikevich, Simple model of spiking neurons, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 14 (2003), 1569–1572. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2003.820440 doi: 10.1109/TNN.2003.820440
![]() |
[21] |
J. Nagumo, S. Sato, On a response characteristic of a mathematical neuron model, Kybernetik, 10 (1972), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290514 doi: 10.1007/BF00290514
![]() |
[22] |
K. Aihara, T. Takabe, M. Toyoda, Chaotic neural networks, Phys. Lett. A, 144 (1990), 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(90)90136-C doi: 10.1016/0375-9601(90)90136-C
![]() |
[23] |
F. Pasemann, A simple chaotic neuron, Physica D, 104 (1997), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2789(96)00239-4 doi: 10.1016/S0167-2789(96)00239-4
![]() |
[24] |
N. F. Rulkov, Modeling of spiking-bursting neural behavior using two-dimensional map, Phys. Rev. E, 65 (2002), 041922. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.65.041922 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.041922
![]() |
[25] |
N. F. Rulkov, Regularization of synchronized chaotic bursts, Phys. Rev. Lett.., 86 (2001), 183. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.183 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.183
![]() |
[26] |
M. Mehrabbeik, F. Parastesh, J. Ramadoss, K. Rajagopal, H. Namazi, S. Jafari, Synchronization and chimera states in the network of electrochemically coupled memristive Rulkov neuron maps, Math. Biosci. Eng., 18 (2021), 9394–9409. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2021462 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021462
![]() |
[27] |
B. Bao, J. Hu, J. Cai, X. Zhang, H. Bao, Memristor-induced mode transitions and extreme multistability in a map-based neuron model, Nonlinear Dyn.. (2022), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07981-8 doi: 10.1007/s11071-022-07981-8
![]() |
[28] |
K. Li, B. Bao, J. Ma, M. Chen, H. Bao, Synchronization transitions in a discrete memristor-coupled bi-neuron model, Chaos Solit. Fract., 165 (2022), 112861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112861 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112861
![]() |
[29] |
H. Sun, H. Cao, Synchronization of two identical and non-identical Rulkov models, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 40 (2016), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.04.011 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.04.011
![]() |
[30] |
I. Franović, V. Miljković, The effects of synaptic time delay on motifs of chemically coupled Rulkov model neurons, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 16 (2011), 623–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.05.007 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.05.007
![]() |
[31] |
S. Rakshit, A. Ray, B. K. Bera, D. Ghosh, Synchronization and firing patterns of coupled Rulkov neuronal map, Nonlinear Dyn., 94 (2018), 785–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-018-4394-8 doi: 10.1007/s11071-018-4394-8
![]() |
[32] |
A. Wagemakers, M. A. Sanjuán, Electronic circuit implementation of the chaotic Rulkov neuron model, J. Franklin Inst., 350 (2013), 2901–2910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2013.01.026 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2013.01.026
![]() |
[33] |
K. Li, H. Bao, H. Li, J. Ma, Z. Hua, B. Bao, Memristive Rulkov neuron model with magnetic induction effects, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., 18 (2021), 1726–1736. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2021.3086819 doi: 10.1109/TII.2021.3086819
![]() |
[34] |
L. Cheng, H. Cao, Synchronization dynamics of two heterogeneous chaotic Rulkov neurons with electrical synapses, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos, 27 (2017), 1730009. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127417300099 doi: 10.1142/S0218127417300099
![]() |
[35] | J. Ma, Biophysical neurons, energy, and synapse controllability: A review, J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A, (2022). |
[36] |
Y. Xie, Z. Yao, J. Ma, Phase synchronization and energy balance between neurons, Front. Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng., (2022), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2100563 doi: 10.1631/FITEE.2100563
![]() |
[37] | M. Rahimy, Applications of fractional differential equations, Appl. Math. Sci., 4 (2010), 2453–2461. |
[38] |
L.-L. Huang, G.-C. Wu, D. Baleanu, H.-Y. Wang, Discrete fractional calculus for interval–valued systems, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 404 (2021), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2020.04.008 doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2020.04.008
![]() |
[39] | F. M. Atici, P. Eloe, Discrete fractional calculus with the nabla operator, Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ Equ., 2009 (2009), 12, electronic only. https://doi.org/10.14232/ejqtde.2009.4.3 |
[40] |
G. A. Anastassiou, Principles of delta fractional calculus on time scales and inequalities, Math. Comput. Modell., 52 (2010), 556–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2010.03.055 doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.03.055
![]() |
[41] |
Y. Wang, K. Sun, S. He, H. Wang, Dynamics of fractional-order sinusoidally forced simplified Lorenz system and its synchronization, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top, 223 (2014), 1591–1600. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2014-02181-3 doi: 10.1140/epjst/e2014-02181-3
![]() |
[42] |
K. Rajagopal, A. Karthikeyan, S. Jafari, F. Parastesh, C. Volos, I. Hussain, Wave propagation and spiral wave formation in a Hindmarsh–Rose neuron model with fractional-order threshold memristor synaps, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 34 (2020), 2050157. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021797922050157X doi: 10.1142/S021797922050157X
![]() |
[43] |
B. Ramakrishnan, F. Parastesh, S. Jafari, K. Rajagopal, G. Stamov, I. Stamova, Synchronization in a Multiplex Network of Nonidentical Fractional-Order Neurons, Fractal Fract, 6 (2022), 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6030169 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract6030169
![]() |
[44] |
W. M. Ahmad, J. C. Sprott, Chaos in fractional-order autonomous nonlinear systems, Chaos Solit. Fract., 16 (2003), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0779(02)00438-1 doi: 10.1016/S0960-0779(02)00438-1
![]() |
[45] |
L. Wang, K. Sun, Y. Peng, S. He, Chaos and complexity in a fractional-order higher-dimensional multicavity chaotic map, Chaos Solit. Fract., 131 (2020), 109488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109488 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109488
![]() |
[46] |
Y. Peng, S. He, K. Sun, Chaos in the discrete memristor-based system with fractional-order difference, Results Phys., 24 (2021), 104106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104106 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104106
![]() |
[47] |
G.-C. Wu, D. Baleanu, Discrete chaos in fractional delayed logistic maps, Nonlinear Dyn., 80 (2015), 1697–1703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1250-3 doi: 10.1007/s11071-014-1250-3
![]() |
[48] |
A. Elsonbaty, Z. Sabir, R. Ramaswamy, W. Adel, Dynamical analysis of a novel discrete fractional SITRs model for COVID-19, Fractals, (2021), 2140035. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X21400351 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X21400351
![]() |
[49] |
S. Kassim, H. Hamiche, S. Djennoune, M. Bettayeb, A novel secure image transmission scheme based on synchronization of fractional-order discrete-time hyperchaotic systems, Nonlinear Dyn., 88 (2017), 2473–2489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3390-8 doi: 10.1007/s11071-017-3390-8
![]() |
[50] |
M. R. Dar, N. A. Kant, F. A. Khanday, Dynamics and implementation techniques of fractional-order neuron models: A survey, Fract. Order Syst., (2022), 483–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824293-3.00017-X doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-824293-3.00017-X
![]() |
[51] |
D. M. Gash, A. S. Deane, Neuron-based heredity and human evolution, Front. Neurosci., 9 (2015), 209. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffnins.2015.00209 doi: 10.3389%2Ffnins.2015.00209
![]() |
[52] |
S. Rakshit, S. Majhi, J. Kurths, D. Ghosh, Neuronal synchronization in long-range time-varying networks, Chaos, 31 (2021), 073129. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0057276 doi: 10.1063/5.0057276
![]() |
[53] |
Q. Xu, T. Liu, S. Ding, H. Bao, Z. Li, B. Chen, Extreme multistability and phase synchronization in a heterogeneous bi-neuron Rulkov network with memristive electromagnetic induction, J. Cogn. Neurosci., , (2022), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-022-09866-3 doi: 10.1007/s11571-022-09866-3
![]() |
[54] |
K. Clark, R. F. Squire, Y. Merrikhi, B. Noudoost, Visual attention: Linking prefrontal sources to neuronal and behavioral correlates, Prog. Neurobiol., 132 (2015), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.06.006 doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.06.006
![]() |
[55] |
J. Ma, J. Tang, A review for dynamics of collective behaviors of network of neurons, Sci. China Technol. Sci., 58 (2015), 2038–2045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-015-5961-6 doi: 10.1007/s11431-015-5961-6
![]() |
[56] |
J. Munkhammar, Chaos in a fractional order logistic map, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 16 (2013), 511–519. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13540-013-0033-8 doi: 10.2478/s13540-013-0033-8
![]() |
[57] |
M.-F. Danca, Puu system of fractional order and its chaos suppression, Symmetry, 12 (2020), 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12030340 doi: 10.3390/sym12030340
![]() |
[58] |
T. Abdeljawad, On Riemann and Caputo fractional differences, Comput. Math. Appl., 62 (2011), 1602–1611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.03.036 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.03.036
![]() |
[59] |
M. T. Holm, The Laplace transform in discrete fractional calculus, Comput. Math. Appl., 62 (2011), 1591–1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.04.019 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.04.019
![]() |
[60] |
F. Atici, P. Eloe, Initial value problems in discrete fractional calculus, Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 137 (2009), 981–989. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-08-09626-3 doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-08-09626-3
![]() |
[61] |
A. Chen, Y. Chen, Existence of solutions to anti-periodic boundary value problem for nonlinear fractional differential equations with impulses, Adv. Differ. Equat., 2011 (2011), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/915689 doi: 10.1155/2011/915689
![]() |
[62] | W. Gerstner, W. M. Kistler, Spiking neuron models: Single neurons, populations, plasticity, Cambridge university press, 2002. |
[63] |
A. Gangopadhyay, D. Mehta, S. Chakrabartty, A spiking neuron and population model based on the growth transform dynamical system, Front. Neurosci., 14 (2020), 425. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00425 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00425
![]() |
[64] |
R. Nickalls, Viete, Descartes and the cubic equation, Math. Gaz., 90 (2006), 203–208. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025557200179598 doi: 10.1017/S0025557200179598
![]() |
[65] |
J. Čermák, I. Győri, L. Nechvátal, On explicit stability conditions for a linear fractional difference system, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 18 (2015), 651–672. https://doi.org/10.1515/fca-2015-0040 doi: 10.1515/fca-2015-0040
![]() |
[66] |
H. Sun, H. Cao, Complete synchronization of coupled Rulkov neuron networks, Nonlinear Dyn., 84 (2016), 2423–2434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-2654-z doi: 10.1007/s11071-016-2654-z
![]() |
[67] |
D. A. Gusnard, M. E. Raichle, Searching for a baseline: Functional imaging and the resting human brain, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 2 (2001), 685–694. https://doi.org/10.1038/35094500 doi: 10.1038/35094500
![]() |
[68] |
S. G. Horovitz, A. R. Braun, W. S. Carr, D. Picchioni, T. J. Balkin, M. Fukunaga, et al., Decoupling of the brain's default mode network during deep sleep, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 106 (2009), 11376–11381. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901435106 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901435106
![]() |
[69] |
K. Rajagopal, S. Panahi, M. Chen, S. Jafari, B. Bao, Suppressing spiral wave turbulence in a simple fractional-order discrete neuron map using impulse triggering, Fractals, 29 (2021), 2140030. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X21400302 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X21400302
![]() |
[70] |
O. Brandibur, E. Kaslik, D. Mozyrska, M. Wyrwas, A Rulkov neuronal model with Caputo fractional variable-order differences of convolution type, Dynam. Syst. Theory Appl., (2019), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77310-6_20 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-77310-6_20
![]() |
[71] |
L. J. Liu, Y. H. Qin, Dynamics of discrete memristor-based Rulkov neuron, IEEE Access, 10 (2022), 72051–72056. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3188787 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3188787
![]() |
[72] |
O. Brandibur, E. Kaslik, D. Mozyrska, M. Wyrwas, Stability of systems of fractional-order difference equations and applications to a Rulkov-type neuronal model, New Trends Nonlinear Dyn., (2020), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34724-6_31 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-34724-6_31
![]() |
1. | Mozhgan Boroumand, Alessandra Olianas, Barbara Manconi, Simone Serrao, Federica Iavarone, Claudia Desiderio, Luisa Pieroni, Gavino Faa, Irene Messana, Massimo Castagnola, Tiziana Cabras, Mapping of Transglutaminase-2 Sites of Human Salivary Small Basic Proline-Rich Proteins by HPLC–High-Resolution ESI–MS/MS, 2020, 19, 1535-3893, 300, 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00527 |
TG | Physiological role | Gene map location | Reference |
Factor XⅢa | Blood clotting | 6p24-25 | [14] |
TG 1 (Keratinocyte TG, kTG) | Skin differentiation | 14q11.2 | [15] |
TG 2 (Tissue TG, tTG, cTG) | Apoptosis, cell adhesion, signal transduction | 20q11-12 | [16] |
TG 3(Epidermal TG, eTG) | Hair follicle differentiation | 20p11.2 | [17] |
TG 4 (Prostate TG, pTG) | Suppression of sperm immunogenicity | 3q21-2 | [18] |
TG 5 (TG X) | Epidermal differentiation | 15q15.2 | [19] |
TG 6 (TG Y) | Central Nervous System development | 20p13 | [19] |
TG 7 (TG Z) | Unknown function | 15q15.2 | [19] |
Disease | Sites of neuropathology | CAG triplet number | Gene product (Intracellular localization of protein deposits) | Reference | |
Normal | Disease | ||||
Corea Major or Huntington's Disease (HD) | Striatum (medium spiny neurons) and cortex in late stage | 6–35 | 36–121 | Huntingtin(n, c) | [50] |
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1 (SCA1) | Cerebellar cortex (Purkinje cells), dentate nucleus and brain stem | 6–39 | 40–81 | Ataxin-1(n, c) | [51] |
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 (SCA2) | Cerebellum, pontine nuclei, substantia nigra | 15–29 | 35–64 | Ataxin-2 (c) | [52] |
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 (SCA3) or Machado-Joseph disease (MJD) | Substantia nigra, globus pallidus, pontine nucleus, cerebellar cortex | 13–42 | 61–84 | Ataxin -3 (c) | [53] |
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6 (SCA6) | Cerebellar and mild brainstem atrophy | 4–18 | 21–30 | Calcium channel Subunit (α 1A)(m) | [54] |
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7 (SCA7) | Photoreceptor and bipolar cells, cerebellar cortex, brainstem | 7–17 | 37–130 | Ataxin-7 (n) | [55] |
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 12 (SCA12) | Cortical, cerebellar atrophy | 7–32 | 41–78 | Brain specific regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase PP2A (?) | [56] |
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 17 (SCA17) | Gliosis and neuronal loss in the Purkinje cell layer | 29–42 | 46–63 | TATA-binding protein (TBP) (n) | [57] |
Spinobulbar Muscular Atrophy (SBMA) or Kennedy Disease | Motor neurons (anterior horn cells, bulbar neurons) and dorsal root ganglia | 11–34 | 40–62 | Androgen receptor (n, c) | [58] |
Dentatorubral-pallidoluysian Atrophy (DRPLA) | Globus pallidus, dentato-rubral and subthalamic nucleus | 7–35 | 49–88 | Atrophin (n, c) | [59] |
Cellular localization: c, cytosol; m, membrane; n, nucleus; ?, unknown localization. |
Associations/cause | Effects |
Gluten intolerance | Gluten ataxia |
Neuroinflammation | Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases |
TG | Physiological role | Gene map location | Reference |
Factor XⅢa | Blood clotting | 6p24-25 | [14] |
TG 1 (Keratinocyte TG, kTG) | Skin differentiation | 14q11.2 | [15] |
TG 2 (Tissue TG, tTG, cTG) | Apoptosis, cell adhesion, signal transduction | 20q11-12 | [16] |
TG 3(Epidermal TG, eTG) | Hair follicle differentiation | 20p11.2 | [17] |
TG 4 (Prostate TG, pTG) | Suppression of sperm immunogenicity | 3q21-2 | [18] |
TG 5 (TG X) | Epidermal differentiation | 15q15.2 | [19] |
TG 6 (TG Y) | Central Nervous System development | 20p13 | [19] |
TG 7 (TG Z) | Unknown function | 15q15.2 | [19] |
Disease | Sites of neuropathology | CAG triplet number | Gene product (Intracellular localization of protein deposits) | Reference | |
Normal | Disease | ||||
Corea Major or Huntington's Disease (HD) | Striatum (medium spiny neurons) and cortex in late stage | 6–35 | 36–121 | Huntingtin(n, c) | [50] |
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1 (SCA1) | Cerebellar cortex (Purkinje cells), dentate nucleus and brain stem | 6–39 | 40–81 | Ataxin-1(n, c) | [51] |
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 (SCA2) | Cerebellum, pontine nuclei, substantia nigra | 15–29 | 35–64 | Ataxin-2 (c) | [52] |
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 (SCA3) or Machado-Joseph disease (MJD) | Substantia nigra, globus pallidus, pontine nucleus, cerebellar cortex | 13–42 | 61–84 | Ataxin -3 (c) | [53] |
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6 (SCA6) | Cerebellar and mild brainstem atrophy | 4–18 | 21–30 | Calcium channel Subunit (α 1A)(m) | [54] |
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7 (SCA7) | Photoreceptor and bipolar cells, cerebellar cortex, brainstem | 7–17 | 37–130 | Ataxin-7 (n) | [55] |
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 12 (SCA12) | Cortical, cerebellar atrophy | 7–32 | 41–78 | Brain specific regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase PP2A (?) | [56] |
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 17 (SCA17) | Gliosis and neuronal loss in the Purkinje cell layer | 29–42 | 46–63 | TATA-binding protein (TBP) (n) | [57] |
Spinobulbar Muscular Atrophy (SBMA) or Kennedy Disease | Motor neurons (anterior horn cells, bulbar neurons) and dorsal root ganglia | 11–34 | 40–62 | Androgen receptor (n, c) | [58] |
Dentatorubral-pallidoluysian Atrophy (DRPLA) | Globus pallidus, dentato-rubral and subthalamic nucleus | 7–35 | 49–88 | Atrophin (n, c) | [59] |
Cellular localization: c, cytosol; m, membrane; n, nucleus; ?, unknown localization. |
Associations/cause | Effects |
Gluten intolerance | Gluten ataxia |
Neuroinflammation | Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases |