Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js

Integrator or coincidence detector --- what shapes the relation of stimulus synchrony and the operational mode of a neuron?

  • The operational mode of a neuron (i.e., whether a neuron is an integrator or a coincidence detector) is in part determined by the degree of synchrony in the firing of its pre-synaptic neural population. More specifically, it is determined by the degree of synchrony that causes the neuron to fire. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between the input and the operational mode. We compare the response-relevant input synchrony, which measures the operational mode and can be determined using a membrane potential slope-based measure [7], with the spike time distance of the spike trains driving the neuron, which measures spike train synchrony and can be determined using the multivariate SPIKE-distance metric [10]. We discover that the relationship between the two measures changes substantially based on the values of the parameters of the input (firing rate and number of spike trains) and the parameters of the post-synaptic neuron (synaptic weight, membrane leak time constant and spike threshold). More importantly, we determine how the parameters interact to shape the synchrony-operational mode relationship. Our results indicate that the amount of depolarisation caused by a highly synchronous volley of input spikes, is the most influential factor in defining the relationship between input synchrony and operational mode. This is defined by the number of input spikes and the membrane potential depolarisation caused per spike, compared to the spike threshold.

    Citation: Achilleas Koutsou, Jacob Kanev, Maria Economidou, Chris Christodoulou. Integrator or coincidence detector --- what shapes the relation of stimulus synchrony and the operational mode of a neuron?[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2016, 13(3): 521-535. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016005

    Related Papers:

    [1] Pedro José Gutiérrez-Diez, Jose Russo . Design of personalized cancer treatments by use of optimal control problems: The case of chronic myeloid leukemia. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(5): 4773-4800. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020261
    [2] Urszula Ledzewicz, Heinz Schättler . The Influence of PK/PD on the Structure of Optimal Controls in Cancer Chemotherapy Models. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2005, 2(3): 561-578. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2005.2.561
    [3] B. M. Adams, H. T. Banks, Hee-Dae Kwon, Hien T. Tran . Dynamic Multidrug Therapies for HIV: Optimal and STI Control Approaches. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2004, 1(2): 223-241. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2004.1.223
    [4] Haifeng Zhang, Jinzhi Lei . Optimal treatment strategy of cancers with intratumor heterogeneity. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(12): 13337-13373. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022625
    [5] Hongli Yang, Jinzhi Lei . A mathematical model of chromosome recombination-induced drug resistance in cancer therapy. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(6): 7098-7111. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019356
    [6] Shuo Wang, Heinz Schättler . Optimal control of a mathematical model for cancer chemotherapy under tumor heterogeneity. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2016, 13(6): 1223-1240. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016040
    [7] Rujing Zhao, Xiulan Lai . Evolutionary analysis of replicator dynamics about anti-cancer combination therapy. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(1): 656-682. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023030
    [8] Urszula Ledzewicz, Shuo Wang, Heinz Schättler, Nicolas André, Marie Amélie Heng, Eddy Pasquier . On drug resistance and metronomic chemotherapy: A mathematical modeling and optimal control approach. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2017, 14(1): 217-235. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017014
    [9] Joseph Malinzi, Rachid Ouifki, Amina Eladdadi, Delfim F. M. Torres, K. A. Jane White . Enhancement of chemotherapy using oncolytic virotherapy: Mathematical and optimal control analysis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2018, 15(6): 1435-1463. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018066
    [10] Urszula Ledzewicz, Heinz Schättler, Mostafa Reisi Gahrooi, Siamak Mahmoudian Dehkordi . On the MTD paradigm and optimal control for multi-drug cancer chemotherapy. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2013, 10(3): 803-819. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.803
  • The operational mode of a neuron (i.e., whether a neuron is an integrator or a coincidence detector) is in part determined by the degree of synchrony in the firing of its pre-synaptic neural population. More specifically, it is determined by the degree of synchrony that causes the neuron to fire. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between the input and the operational mode. We compare the response-relevant input synchrony, which measures the operational mode and can be determined using a membrane potential slope-based measure [7], with the spike time distance of the spike trains driving the neuron, which measures spike train synchrony and can be determined using the multivariate SPIKE-distance metric [10]. We discover that the relationship between the two measures changes substantially based on the values of the parameters of the input (firing rate and number of spike trains) and the parameters of the post-synaptic neuron (synaptic weight, membrane leak time constant and spike threshold). More importantly, we determine how the parameters interact to shape the synchrony-operational mode relationship. Our results indicate that the amount of depolarisation caused by a highly synchronous volley of input spikes, is the most influential factor in defining the relationship between input synchrony and operational mode. This is defined by the number of input spikes and the membrane potential depolarisation caused per spike, compared to the spike threshold.


    [1] Israel Journal of Medical Sciences, 18 (1982), 83-92.
    [2] Journal of Physiology Paris, 90 (1996), 243-247.
    [3] Neural Computation, 9 (1997), 985-1000.
    [4] Verlag von Veit & Comp., Leipzig, 1914.
    [5] Neural Computation, 11 (1999), 1139-1154.
    [6] Trends in Neurosciences, 19 (1996), 130-137.
    [7] Neural Computation, 24 (2012), 2318-2345.
    [8] Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 183 (2009), 287-299.
    [9] Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 195 (2011), 92-106.
    [10] Journal of Neurophysiology, 109 (2013), 1457-1472.
    [11] Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 165 (2007), 151-161.
    [12] Annales de la Faculté des Sciences de Toulouse, 7 (1905), 265-315.
    [13] Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 8 (2014), 452.
    [14] Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 14 (2003), 239-251.
    [15] Neural Computation, 26 (2014), 306-348.
    [16] Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4 (1994), 569-579.
    [17] Journal of Neuroscience, 18 (1998), 3870-3896.
    [18] Neural Computation, 4 (1992), 643-646.
    [19] Journal of Neuroscience, 13 (1993), 334-350.
    [20] Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15 (2005), 585-592.
    [21] Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 8 (1997), 127-164.
    [22] in Analysis of Parallel Spike Trains (eds. S. Grün and S. Rotter), Springer Series in Computational Neuroscience, 7, Springer US, Boston, MA, 2010, 129-156.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. A.S. Bratus, E. Fimmel, S.Yu. Kovalenko, On assessing quality of therapy in non-linear distributed mathematical models for brain tumor growth dynamics, 2014, 248, 00255564, 88, 10.1016/j.mbs.2013.12.007
    2. Chahrazed Benosman, Bedr’Eddine Aïnseba, Arnaud Ducrot, Optimization of Cytostatic Leukemia Therapy in an Advection–Reaction–Diffusion Model, 2015, 167, 0022-3239, 296, 10.1007/s10957-014-0667-7
    3. Ekaterina Guzev, Suchita Suryakant Jadhav, Eleonora Ela Hezkiy, Michael Y. Sherman, Michael A. Firer, Svetlana Bunimovich-Mendrazitsky, Validation of a Mathematical Model Describing the Dynamics of Chemotherapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia In Vivo, 2022, 11, 2073-4409, 2325, 10.3390/cells11152325
    4. N. L. Grigorenko, E. N. Khailov, E. V. Grigorieva, A. D. Klimenkova, Optimal Strategies in the Treatment of Cancers in the Lotka–Volterra Mathematical Model of Competition, 2021, 313, 0081-5438, S100, 10.1134/S0081543821030111
    5. N. L. Grigorenko, E. N. Khailov, E. V. Grigorieva, A. D. Klimenkova, Lotka–Volterra Competition Model with a Nonmonotone Therapy Function for Finding Optimal Strategies in the Treatment of Blood Cancers, 2022, 317, 0081-5438, S71, 10.1134/S0081543822030063
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2016 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3448) PDF downloads(735) Cited by(2)

Article outline

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog